a Delaware limited liability company CK $ $ SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF v;.r1l,~ FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA

Similar documents
Superior Court of California

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ONE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )_ ) ) ) ) )

Filing # E-Filed 12/01/ :28:55 PM

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and all those similarly situated.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States Bankruptcy Court. Northern District of California ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF KERN, NORTH KERN DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA * * *

Case3:13-cv SI Document11 Filed03/26/13 Page1 of 17

Case 3:16-cv LB Document 1 Filed 06/11/16 Page 1 of 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Construction Warranties

VEATCH CARLSON, LLP. Plaintiff YVES CLEMENT alleges as follows: 1 COMPLAINT

Attorneys for Defendant SAK CONSTRUCTION, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

26 /1/ 28 /1/ Donny E. Brand (SBN ) BRAND LAW FIRM E. 4th St., Suite C-473

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT. (Date of Subdivision Map Recordation: )

GOODS & SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ORDINARY MAINTENANCE. between the City of and

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

Home Foundation Subcontractor Services Agreement

Bid Addendum #1 Bid # 13/14-01FA: Furniture and Equipment Bid Issued March 19, 2014

TENDER OF COMPLETION CONTRACTOR TO CITY AND RELEASE AGREEMENT. This TENDER OF COMPLETION CONTRACTOR TO CITY AND RELEASE

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO. Case No.

STATE OF LOUISIANA PLAINTIFFS VERSUS

Case 3:17-cv JCS Document 1 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 8

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO HALL OF JUSTICE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

Server Permission Agreement. P a g e 1

Case3:14-cv MEJ Document1 Filed11/24/14 Page1 of 18

YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to answer the Complaint in this action and to serve a

Qualified Escrow Agreement

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTING AGREEMENT

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

e; SktS5 OFFiec 2011MAY 10 FILED CiffiliAL 4DIVISVt CLEgit-StiPERICR SAW DIEGO COUNTY. CA

Case 4:04-cv SBA Document 48-1 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 13

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION. Case No.

Sample language for limiting one party s liability under a contract

AGREEMENT FOR FABRICATION. AGREEMENT made this the day of day of 20, by and between ( ARTIST ) and ( FABRICATOR ).

2. Green Tree is without knowledge of the allegations contained in Paragraph 2 of

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.: 1. BREACH OF IMPLIED CONTRACT 2. TRESPASS TO CHATTEL

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Attorney for Plaintiff WORLD LOGISTICS SERVICES, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

Case 3:07-cv JCS Document 1 Filed 09/27/2007 Page 1 of 5

Attorneys for Plaintiff STEVE THOMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEVE THOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

1. OVERTIME COMPENSATION AND

other things, the United States Patent Laws, 35 U. S. C. section 10, et seq.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT. THIS SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

Attorneys for Pinal County IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PINAL. No.

Case 4:08-cv RCC Document 1 Filed 02/25/08 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA TUCSON DIVISION

NAPA SANITATION DISTRICT

DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

Attorney for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL CENTER

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES UNLIMITED JURISDICTION. Case No:

IxANVL Binary License Agreement

) SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT COMPLAINT FOR:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demanded)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:16-cv SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/16 Page 1 of 23

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11

led FEB SUPERIOR COURl l.h '-.. irornia BY DEPUTY 1. GENERAL NEGLIGENCE 2. WILLFUL MISCONDUCT 3. WRONGFUL DEATH 4.

SUN INDUSTRY STANDARDS SOURCE LICENSE Version 1.1

OPEN DESIGN ALLIANCE EVALUATION LICENSE AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CONSTRUCTION LICENSE AGREEMENT

Filing # E-Filed 12/22/ :53:20 PM

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ASSOCIATION S COMPLAINT FOR

Tiny Home Construction and Sale Agreement

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER. EDGARDO RODRIGUEZ, an individual,

1099 Pro - Tax Year 2017

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. CASE NO. 113CV Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv MMD-CWH Document 1 Filed 01/05/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:18-cv ECF No. 1 filed 06/20/18 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

PRECIOUS METALS STORAGE AGREEMENT

BASIC SALES TRANSACTION AGREEMENT

Case 3:17-cv JCS Document 1 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 16

3/12/14. TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO SUPPLY and SALES AGREEMENTS

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 07/26/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Certified Partner Agreement. THIS AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is made and entered into on, between the City of Sacramento ( City ) and BACKGROUND

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/15/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/15/2016

FORM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN CONSTRUCTOR AND OWNER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case3:15-cv Document1 Filed01/09/15 Page1 of 16

AGREEMENT FOR THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ART

Transcription:

I t I I.., ti!ia '"t,. s. <S U! '" :I 0 PETER V. DESSAU, ESQ., SBN NO. FRANK J. PERRETTA, ESQ., SBN NO. GRANT H. BAKER, ESQ., SBN NO. MILLER, MORTN, CAILLAT & NEVIS, LLP Metro Drive, Floor San Jose, CA 0- r- r II '- ED ;Jd, f" - n,. 'lo.a - r d.( -'-:l. '" J t: n '"\!nljil0... ' I Telephone: (0) - Ji..i...!...i.j. "t'tp III FacsImile: (0) - David H. Yamasak i Chie f Executi \Ie Off c Attorneys for Plaintiff By: ssancayco DTSCl! THE IRVINE COMPANY LLC, R#D00iJi a Delaware limited liability company CK $0. 0 TL $0. r :. -CV- SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF v;.rl, FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA THE IRVINE COMPANY LLC, a Delaware ) Case No. limited liability company, ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, BREACH Plaintiff, ) OF CONTRACT, BREACH OF EXPRESS ) WARRANTY, NEGLIGENCE; BREACH vs. lof WRITTEN CONTRACT BY TIDRD PARTY BENEFICIARY; AND BREACH OF SEGUE CONSTRUCTION, INC., a California EXPRESS INDEMNITY corporation; and DOES through 0, ) Defendants. Unlimited Civil Case (over $,000) ) PRELIMINARY ALLEGATIONS. Notwithstanding the allegations identified herein, Plaintiff THE IRVINE COMPANY LLC (hereinafter "IRVINE" or "Plaintiff') does not waive its right to have this matter submitted to binding arbitration, in accordance with the terms of its Prime Contract with SEGUE CONSTRUCTION, INC. (hereinafter "SEGUE"), or, in the alternative, judicial reference pursuant to California Code ofcivil Procedures sections, et seq.. Plaintiff IRVINE is a Delaware limited liability company authorized to do, and doing business in California and is the owner of the real property commonly known as THE PINES AT NORTH PARK APARTMENTS located in San Jose, California ("PINES"). The PINES is comprised oftwo parcels, Parcel Bland B. The allegations and claims identified herein pertain to

Parcel B only. The PINES, Parcel B, is legally described in Exhibit "A" which is attached hereto.; 0!a ;!u..& '- ;: tll. <S U I!l ri (the "Property").. Defendant SEGUE is a California corporation authorized to do, and is doing business in the State ofcalifornia.. Plaintiff is ignorant of the true names and capacities of Defendants sued herein as DOES through 0, inclusive, and therefore sues these Defendants by such fictitious names. Plaintiff prays leave. to amend this Complaint to allege their true names and capacities when the same have been ascertained.. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges that DOES through 0, are design professionals who were hired by Plaintiff or SEGUE to perform work at the Property including, but not limited to, architectural and other design and/or consulting services.. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges that DOES through 0, are subcontractors who were hired directly by SEGUE to perform work at the Property including, but not limited to, work at breezeways, private balconies and stairwells.. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges that DOES through, are third party or lower-tier subcontractors, hired by subcontractors who were hired directly by SEGUE, to perform work at the Property including, but not limited to, work at breezeways, private balconies and stairwells.. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges that DOES through 0, are third party or lower-tier subcontractors or design professionals, hired by design professionals who were hired by Plaintiff or SEGUE to perform work at the Property including, but not limited to, architectural, structural, civil and other design and/or consulting services.. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges that each of the Defendants sued herein is responsible in some manner for the occurrences herein alleged, and that Plaintiff's damages, as herein alleged, were legally caused by such Defendants.. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges that at all times herein mentioned each ofthe Defendants sued herein was the agent and employee of each of the remaining Defendants, and was, at all times, acting within the scope ofsuch agency and employment.

t J t <Ii!la >-" S! h lo 0 U ::I. On or around August, 000, IRVINE entered into an agreement with SEGUE (the "Prime Contract") whereby SEGUE agreed to construct on the Property a certain set of improvements more particularly described in the Prime Contract; specifically a multi-story apartment building (the "Project"). A true and correct copy of the Prime Contract is attached hereto as Exhibit "B".. After SEGUE and The Irvine Company entered into the Prime Contract, The Irvine Company transferred and assigned its rights under the Prime Contract to Irvine Commercial Development Company ("ICDC"), which later changed its name to Irvine Commercial Property Company and merged with and into IRVINE. By these assignments and mergers, IRVINE is the true legal entity having rights to enforce the Prime Contract.. Within the last three () years from the date of this Complaint, Plaintiff discovered that there were certain conditions at the Project resulting in water penetration causing tangible property damage at the Project. Specifically, Plaintiff is informed and believes, and based thereon alleges, that there are defects in the breezeways, private balconies and stairwells at the Project. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION [Breach of Contract against Defendant SEGUE]. Plaintiff hereby re-alleges and incorporates by this reference each and every allegation contained in Paragraphs through of its Complaint, as though fully set forth herein.. Pursuant to Paragraph., of the Prime Contract, SEGUE agreed that it would be solely responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures employed in connection with the work. SEGUE further agreed to be responsible for any failure by it or its subcontractors to carry out the work, including, without limitation, the construction of the breezeways, private balconies and stairwells at the Project, in accordance with the contract documents and all applicable laws, rules and regulations.. Plaintiff has fully performed all terms, conditions, covenants and promises required of it pursuant to the terms ofthe Prime Contract.. SEGUE breached the terms of the Prime Contract by, among other things, failing to construct the breezeways, private balconies and stairwells at the Project in substantial compliance

with the contract docwnents and all applicable local and state codes.!i 0 d {:II <S Ii j I. The Prime Contract contains an attorneys' fees clause.. As a proximate result ofdefendant's breach ofthe contract, as set forth above, Plaintiff has suffered damage in an amount to be shown according to proof at trial, but not limited to, the cost of repairing and replacing the defective materials and workmanship, testing and investigation of such defective materials and workmanship, lost rents and income, diminution of fair market value, and legal and professional costs, as well as other incidental and consequential damages. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendant as SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION [Breach ofcontract against DOES through 0, inclusive) 0. Plaintiff hereby re-alleges and incorporates by this reference each and every allegation contained in Paragraphs through ofits Complaint, as though fully set forth herein.. Plaintiff entered into various written agreements with Defendant DOES through 0 for the performance of certain design and/or consulting services in connection with the design, planning, surveying of the Project, including design and/or consulting services in connection with waterproofing of the breezeways, private balconies and stairwells on the Project (collectively "Design Contracts").. Pursuant to paragraphs. and. oftheir Design Contracts with IRVINE, Defendants DOES through 0 contracted to perform their services with professional skill and care.. Plaintiff has fully performed all terms, conditions, covenants and promises required of it pursuant to the terms ofthe Design Contracts.. DOES through 0, inclusive breached the terms of the Design Contracts by, among other things, failing to design the breezeways, private balconies and stairwells at the Project in substantial compliance with all applicable local and state codes and according to industry standard.. The Design Contracts contain attorneys' fees provisions.. As a proximate result of the Defendants' breach(es) of the contract, as set forth above, Plaintiff has suffered damage in an amount to be shown according to proof at trial, but not limited to, the cost of repairing and replacing the defective materials and workmanship, testing and

t. vi h d tll -!U IQ! Ii' ::Ii 0 investigation of such defective materials and workmanship, lost rents and income, diminution of fair market value, and legal and professional costs, as well as other incidental and consequential damages. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendants, and each of them, as THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION [Breach of Express Warranties Against Defendant SEGUE]. Plaintiff hereby re-alleges and incorporates by this reference each and every allegation contained in Paragraphs through of its Complaint, as though fully set forth herein.. Pursuant to Paragraph.. ofthe Prime Contract, SEGUE warranted to Plaintiff "that all Work will be completed in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents (whether performed by Contractor or a Subcontractor) and will be of good workmanship and quality." SEGUE further warranted to Plaintiff "that the Work and all portions thereof (whether performed by Contractor or a Subcontractor) will be free from all defects in material and workmanship furnished in the Contract Documents for a period of one () year from the date of Final Completion.". SEGUE breached the warranty contained in Paragraph.. by, among other things, failing to construct the breezeways, private balconies and stairwells at the Project in a workmanlike manner and in a manner consistent with the Prime Contract. 0. The Prime Contract contains an attorneys' fees clause entitling any party enforcing any provision ofthe Agreement to recover reasonable attorneys' fees.. As a proximate result of Defendants' breach of contract, as set forth above, Plaintiff has suffered damage in an amount to be shown according to proof at trial, but not limited to, the cost of repairing and replacing the defective materials and workmanship, testing and investigation of such defective materials and workmanship, lost rents and income, diminution of fair market value, and legal and professional costs, as well as other incidental and consequential damages. II NEGLIGENCE, AND BREACH OF WRITTEN CONTRACT BY TIDRD PARTY BENEFICIARY

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendants, and each of them, as FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION d.,;!a d 0 i U ;!(I! [Negligence against Defendants SEGUE and DOES through 0, inclusive and through, inclusive]. Plaintiff hereby re-alleges and incorporates by this reference each and every allegation contained in P!lfagraphs through of its Complaint, as though fully set forth herein.. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and based thereon alleges that Defendant DOES through 0 entered into various agreements with SEGUE to perform certain works of improvement in connection with the construction of the Project including, without limitation, design services, consulting services, construction services and repair services in connection with the construction and waterproofing ofthe breezeways, private balconies and stairwells on the Project.. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and based thereon alleges that Defendant DOES through, inclusive entered into various agreements with DOES through 0, inclusive to actually perform certain works of improvement in connection with the construction of the Project including, without limitation, design services, consulting services, construction services and repair services in connection with the construction and waterproofing of the breezeways, private balconies and stairwells on the Project.. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and based thereon alleges, that the aforementioned services were performed in a negligent manner and that such services resulted in water penetration to the Project which has caused tangible property damage to elements ofthe Project.. As a proximate result of Defendants, and each of their, negligent conduct, Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount to be shown according to proof at trial, but not limited to, the cost of repairing and replacing the defective materials and workmanship, testing and investigation of such defective materials and workmanship, lost rents and income, diminution of fair market value, as well as other incidental and consequential damages. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendants, and each of them, as

h d.! 0 IH g I FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION [Negligence against Defendants DOES through 0, inclusive and through 0, inclusive]. Plaintiff hereby re-alleges and incorporates by this reference each and every allegation contained in Paragraphs through of its Complaint, as though fully set forth herein.. Plaintiff entered into various agreements with DOES through 0, inclusive for the performance of certain design and/or consulting services in connection with the design, planning, surveying of the Project, including design and/or consulting services in connection with waterproofing of the breezeways, private balconies and stairwells on the Project.. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and based thereon alleges that Defendant DOES through 0, inclusive entered into various agreements with DOES through 0, inclusive to perform design and/or consulting services in connection with the design, planning and surveying on the Project, including design and/or consulting services related to the waterproofing of the breezeways, private balconies and stairwells on the Project. 0. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and based thereon alleges, that the aforementioned services were performed in a negligent manner and that such services resulted in water penetration to the Project which has caused tangible property damage to elements of the Project.. As a proximate result of Defendants, and each of their, negligent conduct, Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount to be shown according to proof at trial, but not limited to, the cost of repairing and replacing the defective materials and workmanship, testing and investigation of such defective materials and workmanship, lost rents and income, diminution of fair market value, as well as other incidental and consequential damages, WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendants, and each of them, as SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION [Breach of Written Contract by Third Party Beneficiary against DOES through SO, inclusive]. Plaintiff hereby re-alleges and incorporates by this reference each and every allegation contained in Paragraphs through of its Complaint, as though fully set forth herein.

. Plaintiff is infonned and believes, and thereon alleges, that Defendant SEGUE entered.. i!!i... " -i 0 -! U lq.! i into various written contracts with Defendants DOES through 0, inclusive to perfonn certain works of improvement in connection with construction of the Project including, without limitation, design services, consulting services, construction services and repair services in connection with the construction and waterproofing of the breezeways, private balconies and stairwells on the Project.. Plaintiff is infonned and believes, and thereon alleges, that Plaintiff was an intended third party beneficiary of those contracts entered into by and between Defendants.. Plaintiff is infonned and believes, and thereon alleges, that Defendants DOES through 0, inclusive breached the written contracts by, among other things, failing to construct the breezeways, private balconies and stairwells at the Project in a workmanlike manner and in a manner consistent with the Prime Contract.. As a proximate result of Defendants' breach of contract, as set forth above, Plaintiff has suffered damage in an amount to be shown according to proof at trial, but not limited to, the cost of repairing and replacing the defective materials and workmanship, testing and investigation of such defective materials and workmanship, lost rents and income, diminution of fair market value, and legal and professional costs, as well as other incidental and consequential damages. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendants, and each of them, as PRAYER For The First, Second, Third And Sixth Causes of Action:. For damages according to proof;. For fees and costs; For The Fourth & Fifth Cause of Action:. For damages according to proof; II / / /

, i For All Causes of Action:. For interest at the maximum legal rate; and. For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. Dated: February $-,0 MILLER, MORTON, CAILLAT & NEVIS, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff THE IRVINE COMPANY LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ::ODMA\GRPWISE\MMCN_SJDOMAIN.MMCN_SJPO.NewLitigationLibrary:..; 0!! I&.& t::.! U r.:! J