The Lacey Act: Potential Effects on Aquaculture

Similar documents
United States Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Law Enforcement

Legal Issues in Animal Welfare: Farm Animal Confinement

Ensuring Animal Welfare: Who s In Charge Here?

ELEMENTS OF CONSERVATION LAW

7 Section 1. Section , Florida Statutes, is amended to

ARTICLE 2 ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF GUAM

WILDLIFE AND NATURAL ENVIRONMENT (SCOTLAND) BILL [AS AMENDED AT STAGE 2]

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. hb c2

US Code (Unofficial compilation from the Legal Information Institute) TITLE 16 - CONSERVATION CHAPTER 53 CONTROL OF ILLEGALLY TAKEN FISH AND WILDLIFE

Application for a Pre-CITES Certificate or a Certificate of Origin under Part 13A of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999

53RD LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2017

NC General Statutes - Chapter 113 Article 22B 1

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 2388

F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HB

Families Against Mandatory Minimums 1612 K Street, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C

Trade in Endangered Species Act 1989

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 1143

Changes to international trade controls for African grey parrots

Chapter 391. International Trade (Fauna and Flora) Act Certified on: / /20.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 SENATE BILL 410 RATIFIED BILL

Texas Administrative Code

CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE, REFERENCE SECTIONS FOR AB 2052, Williams, as amended March 17, 2016

ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF PROHIBITED ACTS

USDA Foreign Agricultural Service GAIN Report. Global Agriculture Information Network. Required Report - Public distribution

Jersey Law 16/1963 PROTECTION OF BIRDS (JERSEY) LAW, 1963, CONFIRMÉ PAR. Ordre de Sa Majesté en Conseil. en date du 29 juillet 1963

National legislation and prevention of illegal trade of wildlife, including Ivory in Sri Lanka

Where the Wild Things Are Properly Valued: A Look into Methods Used by Courts to Assign Monetary Value to Wildlife

The United States Endangered Species Act of 1973.

LAW ENFORCEMENT DIVISION / SPECIAL PERMIT UNIT 2070 U.S. Hwy. 278, SE SOCIAL CIRCLE, GEORGIA

115 No. 15 ] International Trade in Wild Fauna and Flora [ 2007.

ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF 1973

An Act respecting commercial aquaculture

Hong Kong Food and Agricultural Import Regulations and Standards - Certification FAIRS Export Certificate Report

Union of Myanmar. Ministry of Agriculture and Forests. The Burma Wild Life Protection Act, 1936 and The Burma Wild Life Protection Rules, 1941

Wyoming Animal Cruelty Laws Sofia Gall 1

CHAPTER House Bill No. 1911

Act on Welfare and Management of Animals. (Act No. 105 of October 1, 1973) Provisional translation

Reference Guide. European Community Wildlife Trade Regulations

FAUNA AND FLORA PROTECTION

RHODE ISLAND MARINE FISHERIES STATUTES AND REGULATIONS

The Endangered Species Act of 1973*

The Endangered Species Act and Take. Rollie White Oregon Field Office US Fish and Wildlife Service

ANIMAL PROTECTION LAWS OF ALASKA

SECTION 6 MISCELLANEOUS. DOG CONTROL Ordinance No. 253 Adopted: July 7, 1976

THE PARK DOCTRINE AND PROSECUTION OF MISDEMEANOR VIOLATIONS UNDER THE FEDERAL FOOD, DRUG, AND COSMETIC ACT (OR FARMER BILL GOES TO JAIL)

NATIONAL AGENCY FOR FOOD AND DRUG ADMINSTRATION AND CONTROL (NAFDAC)

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 1951

Ref. No. D. 66:07 Ministry of Justice National Parks and Wildlife (Amendment) Bill, 2016 Author: Rumbani Jere

MARINE (SCOTLAND) ACT 2010

Humane Society Police Officers 22 Pa.C.S.A. Chapter 37

ANIMAL PROTECTION LAWS OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS

Questions and answers on the EU Action Plan against Wildlife Trafficking

Mail and Wire Fraud: An Abridged Overview of Federal Criminal Law

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL ENVIRONMENT

Animal Welfare Act 2006

States Animal Cruelty Statutes

NATIONAL AGENCY FOR FOOD AND DRUG ADMINSTRATION AND CONTROL (NAFDAC)

18 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Subscriber Registration Agreement. Signing up is as easy as 1, 2, 3...

AQUACULTURE MANAGEMENT ACT 2003

Oleh-oleh dari Chatham House-London Direktur Jenderal Bina Produksi Kehutanan

Chapter 8. Criminal Wrongs. Civil and Criminal Law. Classification of Crimes

ANIMAL PROTECTION LAWS OF GEORGIA

University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture An Agricultural Law Research Project States Fence Laws State of Georgia

SECTION 32 AND RELATED LAWS

Order Adopting Amendments. Title 58. Recreation Part II. Fish and Boat Commission Chapters 51, 57, 71, 75, 79 and 93

Case: 1:02-cr Document #: 92 Filed: 02/28/03 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:257

YOUR STAY IN THE UK SECURING OUR BORDER CONTROLLING MIGRATION. Important information for visitors, students and workers with a visa to come to the UK.

LAWS OF SOLOMON ISLANDS CHAPTER 149 NATIONAL PARKS ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for any term of years or life, or both.

CHAPTER House Bill No. 7013

I. Should the Department of Justice Formalize Its Policy Regarding Possession of Eagle Feathers by Tribal Members?

PROTECTED SPECIES ACT 2003 BERMUDA 2003 : 15 PROTECTED SPECIES ACT 2003

Animal Law Conference Additional Resources for the Aquatic Animal Law Panel Kathy Hessler

THE PROTECTION OF BADGERS ACT 1992 (C.51) (SCOTTISH VERSION)

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2010 COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO. 3085

APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR GOING OUT OF BUSINESS SALE PERMIT

Welfare of Animals Act (Northern Ireland) 2011

As Introduced. Regular Session S. B. No Senators Hughes, Hottinger Cosponsors: Senators Yuko, LaRose, Williams A B I L L

Diseases of Animals Act (Northern-Ireland) 2010

Conf (Rev. CoP13) *

Case 2:18-cr SPC-MRM Document 43 Filed 12/03/18 Page 1 of 21 PageID 70

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. f~e1~ ~ g c~-,lu PLEA AGREEMENT

Explanatory screening meeting with Serbia September 2014 CITES Team DG ENV

Africa-Asia Pacific Symposium on Strengthening Legal Frameworks to Combat Wildlife Crime

THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ) ) ) ) ) )

Preamble A Bill to further amend the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972

A Bill Regular Session, 2017 HOUSE BILL 1554

FISHERIES ACT CHAPTER 378 LAWS OF KENYA

PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA

(29 April 2014 to date) NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT: BIODIVERSITY ACT 10 OF 2004

COLORADO BRAND LAWS COLORADO REVISED STATUTES TITLE 35. AGRICULTURE III--LIVESTOCK ARTICLE 43. BRANDING AND HERDING

HOME RULE RESOLUTION NO. HR-93-5 A RESOLUTION PROHIBITING THE OWNERSHIP, POSSESSING, KEEPING, OR HARBORING OF CERTAIN ANIMALS

Presented at the. March 19, Roger A. Haseman Assistant District Attorney Harris County, Texas

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Hunting Bill EXPLANATORY NOTES

Adapting to a New Era of Strict Criminal Liability

ARTICLE 10 Seeds. This act [ to NMSA 1978] may be cited as the "New Mexico Seed Law."

ORDINANCE NO. 387 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ANIMAL CONTROL, PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION THEREOF AND REPEALING ORDINANCES NOS. 8, 51, AND 232.

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 7021

Transcription:

www.nationalaglawcenter.org The Lacey Act: Potential Effects on Aquaculture E L I Z A B E T H R U M L E Y S TA F F AT T O R N E Y (479) 387-2331 erumley@uark.edu

www.nationalaglawcenter.org

Administrative Law Animal Identification Aquaculture Biosecurity Business Orgs Clean Water Act Commercial Trans. Conservation Programs Cooperatives Disaster Asst/Crop Ins Estate & Taxation Food Labeling International Law Labor Landowner Liability Local Food Systems Nat l Organic Program Native American Ag Packers & Stockyards Pesticides Renewable Energy Specialty Crops Urbanization & Ag Agritourism ADR AFOs Animal Welfare Bankruptcy Biotechnology Checkoff Climate Change Commodity Programs Corp. Farming COOL Environmental Law Finance & Credit Food Safety International Trade Marketing Orders Nutrition Programs PACA Production Contracts Secured Trans. Sustainable Ag Water Law

Overview Major Statutes Regulations Case Law Index Center Research Publications Congressional Research Service Reports Agricultural Law Bibliography Reference Resources Governmental Agency Resources Congressional Resources International Resources Publications Additional Resources

Today s Presentation: The Lacey Act: Potential Effects on Aquaculture

History Knowledge Requirements and Penalties Suggestions Examples

History Knowledge Requirements and Penalties Suggestions Examples

History Oldest national wildlife protection statute. Enacted in 1900 and intended to combat Hunting to supply commercial markets Interstate shipment of unlawfully killed game Introduction of harmful exotic species Killing of birds for feather trades Significantly amended in 1981, 1988, and 2008

Application Applies to all wild animals, whether alive or dead, including reptiles, amphibians, fish, mollusks, crustaceans, arthropods, coelenterate, or other invertebrate, whether or not bred, hatched, or born in captivity, and any part, product, egg, or offspring. Since 2008, also applies to a broad range of plants

History Knowledge Requirements and Penalties Suggestions Examples

Prohibitions Wildlife Trafficking Both domestic and international False Labeling

Trafficking: Prohibitions Unlawful to import, export, transport, sell, receive, acquire, or purchase any fish or wildlife already taken (i.e., captured, killed, or collected), possessed, transported, or sold in violation of state, federal, American Indian tribal, or foreign laws, or regulations that are fish or wildlife-related Two part test: Possession/movement of creatures In violation of laws

Trafficking: State v. Federal Prosecution An interstate or foreign commerce nexus is required when the underlying law violated is state or foreign, but not when it is federal or tribal law. In other words: If you re shipping interstate and violate state law you can be prosecuted under either the federal or the state statute If you re shipping in-state and violate state law you can only be prosecuted under the state statute If you re shipping in-state and violate federal law, you can only be prosecuted under the federal statute

Trafficking: Felony Provisions To be convicted as a felony: Defendant must know about, or be generally aware of, the illegal nature of the wildlife, but not necessarily the specific law violated AND Must involve the sale, purchase, offer, or intent to sell, purchase, or offer wildlife for over $350

Trafficking: Felony Penalties Criminal Penalties Up to five years imprisonment Up to $250,000 fine $500,000 for organizations- including business organizations Civil Penalties Up to $10,000 civil penalty

Trafficking: Misdemeanor Provisions To be convicted as a misdemeanor: The prosecution must show that the defendant, in the exercise of due care, should know the facts constituting the underlying law violation. Due care is the degree of care which a reasonably prudent person would exercise under the same or similar circumstances. OR Defendant knew about illegality, but value was less than $350

Trafficking: Misdemeanor Penalties Criminal Penalties Up to 1 year in prison Up to $100,000 fine $200,000 for organizations, including business organizations Civil Penalties If defendant knew about illegality but value was less than $350, may also include $10,000 civil penalty

Labeling: Provisions Making or submitting any false record, account, label for, or identification of any wildlife transported or intended to be transported in interstate or foreign commerce may be prosecuted as either a misdemeanor or felony. In other words, the shipment must be marked or labeled correctly. Each container or package must be marked conspicuously on the outside with the name and address of the shipper and consignee. Also, an accurate and legible list of its contents by species scientific name and the number of each species and whether or not the listed species are venomous must accompany the entire shipment.

Labeling: Penalties Felony: Products with a market value GREATER than $350 Punishment Up to 5 years and/or $250,000 ($500,000 for organizations) Misdemeanor: Involves products with a market value LESS than $350 Punishment Up to 1 year and/or $100,000 ($200,000 for organizations)

And More Each violation is a separate offense This means that defendants may be sentenced to the maximum penalty for each count of the indictment leading to much higher penalties overall. Strict liability forfeiture exists for wildlife contraband In other words, if you re caught, you can lose the goods- as well as all the vehicles and equipment to ship them! Violations can be aggregated, or combined, for charging purposes In other words, the prosecutor can combine violations into one charge. This might lead to felony charges instead of misdemeanors

History Knowledge Requirements and Penalties Suggestions Examples

Felony v. Misdemeanor Knowledge For a felony, the prosecution must prove that the defendant acted knowingly In other words, does the defendant know/is he aware that the wildlife was illegal. For a misdemeanor, the prosecution must prove that the defendant, in the exercise of due care, should have known that illegal wildlife was shipped across state lines In other words, would an ordinarily reasonable person have known acted the same way in that situation?

History Knowledge Requirements and Penalties Suggestions Examples

Tools to Demonstrate Due Care Asking questions Compliance plans Industry standards Records of efforts Changes to above in response to practical experiences

Examples of Red Flags for Purchasers Goods significantly below going market rate Cash only/lower price for goods without paperwork Paperwork facially invalid or otherwise suspect Unusual sales methods or practices Inability of suppliers to provide rational answers to routine questions

History Knowledge Requirements and Penalties Suggestions Examples

What if

What if Producer A sells a load of diploid black carp to Producer B. Diploid black carp may be possessed in Arkansas. However, it is on the federal invasive species list, so it may not be transported across state lines. Possible charges against A: Trafficking Possible charges against B: Trafficking

What if Producer A sells a load of catfish to Producer B, but it is labeled whitefish Possible charges against A: False Labeling Possible charges against B: None

What if Producer A sells a load labeled catfish to Producer B, and a black carp is included in the shipment. Possible charges against A: False Labeling Trafficking Possible charges against B: Trafficking

What if A sells a load labeled catfish to Trucker in AR. A diploid black carp is included in the shipment. Trucker drives the shipment to AL, and sells it to Producer B. Possible charges against A: False Labeling Possible charges against B: Trafficking Possible charges against Trucker: Trafficking

What if Producer A sells a load correctly labeled fishfish to Producer C. Possession of fishfish is legal is AR and WI, but illegal in IL, where Trucker is pulled over. No Lacey Act violation, as long as it was correctly labeled. Trafficking provisions do not apply to interstate shipment if the shipment is traveling to a state in which the fish or wildlife may be legally possessed.

Contact Information: National Agricultural Law Elizabeth R. Rumley Phone: (479) 387-2331 Email: erumley@uark.edu www.nationalaglawcenter.org Lacey Act Factsheet Aquaculture Reading Room Sign up for NALC Communications