South Australia s Environment Protection Authority Managing Nuisance Issues

Similar documents
Access to Justice: Regulation of power stations

Noise. Fact Sheet 25. Environmental Defender s Office of Western Australia (Inc.) An introduction to Noise. What is noise?

We believe that residents in the Rochford District area should have the following rights.

Pollution (Control) Act 2013

NEIGHBOUR NOISE. working for a cleaner, quieter, healthier world

Chico, CA Code of Ordinances. Chapter 9.38 NOISE

Sec General Provisions. 1. Scope. This Section applies to the control of all sound and noise within

NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT: AIR QUALITY ACT NO. 39 OF 2004

Environmental Law for Facilities Managers. Mr James Pong Mr Francis Yeung

Report. on an investigation into complaint no 05/B/04194 against Sedgemoor District Council

BYLAW 2220/G/05 BEING A BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF STONY PLAIN IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA TO REGULATE NOISE WITHIN THE TOWN OF STONY PLAIN

Community Protection Notices Surrey Framework

Street Trading Policy

SALDANHA BAY MUNICIPALITY: AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BY-LAW

GRASS LAKE CHARTER TOWNSHIP PAGE 1 POLICE POWER ORDINANCE

Anti social behaviour Team. Anti-social behaviour don t tolerate it

Certificate of Registration. issued under. the Waste Management Act and the

CHAPTER 616 TOWN OF SCARBOROUGH GOOD NEIGHBOR ORDINANCE

Business zone: Those areas so designated under business zone of the zoning ordinances of the City of New Britain.

Kerry County Council Protocol for Dealing with Noise Complaints

Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act (Northern-Ireland) 2011

DISTRICT OF CHETWYND BYLAW NO. 874, A bylaw to regulate or prohibit the making or causing of noises or sound in the municipality

10/30/2015 Danbury, CT Code of Ordinances

Authority: Item 8, Planning Committee Report (PED10115(a)) CM: November 30, 2011

Municipal Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw No. 1598, 2012 adopted May 28, 2012

ADVICE NOTE ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR. Practical advice for tackling antisocial behaviour in your block

in brief corrs Sustainable Planning and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2012 Amendments march 2012 The new Chapter 8A Urban

ANSI. American National Standards Institute or its successor organization.

BYLAW THE NOISE BYLAW

PART A NOISE CONTROL ORDINANCE. a. Title. This ordinance shall be known and may be cited as the "State College Noise Control Ordinance.

SUMMARY OF DUTIES AND POWERS IN RESPECT OF TACKLING ILLEGAL WASTE MANAGEMENT AND FLY-TIPPING FOR THE AGENCY AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES

CP Motors Storage Terms & Conditions (2014)

To be opened on receipt

REQUEST FOR THE COUNCIL S CONSTITUTION TO BE AMENDED TO ADOPT NEW POWERS UNDER THE ANTI- SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR CRIME AND POLICING ACT 2014

Regional District of Central Kootenay

ORDINANCE, DEPARTMENT -- The agency designated by the governing body as being responsible for enforcing the provisions of this ordinance.

TOWN OF LA RONGE BYLAW NO. 343/95

COMOX VALLEY REGIONAL DISTRICT BYLAW NO A bylaw to regulate or prohibit objectionable noise

HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ANTI-NOISE AND PUBLIC NUISANCE ORDINANCE. The Township of Hamilton Clare County, Michigan ORDAINS SECTION 1 TITLE

PORT INDUSTRIAL ZONE - RULES

Review of Environmental Acoustic Legislation. Mosquito High Frequency Sound Deterrent. COMPOUND SECURITY SYSTEMS By

Anti-social Behaviour Act 2003

ALAMANCE COUNTY ORDINANCE PROHIBITING UNREASONABLY LOUD, DISTURBING, AND UNNECESSARY NOISES

CITY OF JOHANNESBURG METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BY-LAWS

NOISE, THE LAW AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICER

TOWN OF ALBURGH NOISE CONTROL ORDINANCE

Laois County Council Anti-Social Behaviour Strategy

Bylaw No The Noise Bylaw. Codified to Bylaw No (April 30, 2018)

VICTOR TOWNSHIP CLINTON COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 25 PREAMBLE

CITY OF MIDWAY ORDINANCE NO TITLE: AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO PROHIBITING AND CONTROLLING NOISE DISTURBANCE.

ARTICLE I SHORT TITLE ARTICLE II AUTHORITY

Noise Control Bylaw No. 4404, Consolidated for Convenience Only

TAVISTOCK SELF STORAGE TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

STRATA SCHEMES MANAGEMENT ACT (1996) Schedule 1 BY-LAWS

BUILDING MAINTENANCE (STRATA MANAGEMENT) REGULATIONS SECOND SCHEDULE PRESCRIBED BY-LAWS

Protection of the Environment Legislation Amendment Act 2014 No 65

The Student agrees with the Licensor to comply with the following obligations.

ORDINANCE NO. 182 EPHRATA TOWNSHIP, LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA AN ORDINANCE DEFINING AND REGULATING NOISE IN

BODY CORPORATE DEPOTEL FLATS C O N D U C T R U L E S

CITY OF THE VILLAGE OF DOUGLAS ALLEGAN COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO THE CITY OF THE VILLAGE OF DOUGLAS ORDAINS:

DOMESTIC NOISE CONTROL A GUIDE TO LEGAL ACTION

Administrative Citation Procedure

Bylaw No The Noise Bylaw. Codified to Bylaw No (May 3, 2004)

MUNICIPALITY OF EAST HANTS BYLAW NUMBER P-100

ASB Reforms. Baljit Basra Partner

NEO North Lakes By Laws

Licensing Authority Statement of Licensing Policy

THE CORPORATION OF DELTA. No. 1906, 1972

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council. Planning Enforcement Policy

Noise Control Ordinance for the Town of Royalton

Noise Control Bylaw No. 4404, Consolidated for Convenience Only

HUU-AY-AHT FIRST NATIONS

Sub-delegations under the Local Nuisance and Litter Control Act 2016

CHAPTER III ANIMALS. Part 1. Animal Nuisances

BYLAW Traffic Safety Act being Chapter T-6 of the Revised Statutes of Alberta, 2000 and amendments thereto;

Adopted 10/25/2004. Noise Control Ordinance. 1. Authority: This ordinance is adopted under authority of 24 V.S.A and 24 V.S.A. chapters 59.

The Corporation of the City of Pembroke. By-law Number Being a By-law to Control Noise.

Village of Cayuga Heights Local Law 5 of 2012 ARTICLE 36 Noise Ordinance

Exemptions and Objections Committee Agenda

Material Planning Considerations

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF COURTENAY BYLAW NO. 2804

SOLOMON ISLANDS THE ENVIRONMENT ACT 1998 (NO. 8 OF 1998) Passed by the National Parliament this twentieth day of October 1998.

VANCOUVER POLICE DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND RESEARCH SECTION

MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF ROCKY VIEW NO. 44 BYLAW NO. C Page 1

ENFORCEMENT POLICY. Water Supply (Water Fittings) Regulations 1999

A working guide to seeking enforcement in planning matters and nuisance under the Public Health and Wellbeing Act

Wanganui District Council Noise Control Policy 2009

Compliance approach in the Product Emissions Standards Bill 2017

World Youth Day Act 2006 No 106

Enforcement Strategy and Prosecution Policy. Adopted Council 26 June 2014

BOROUGH OF ST. CLAIR SCHUYLKILL COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ENACTED AND ORDAINED BY THE Borough Council of the Borough of St.

CHAPTER 95: NOISE: Any sound or combination of sounds which because of its volume, duration or intensity tends to disturb person(s).

Residential Noise: Legislative Framework and Evidence Gathering

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1082

TOWN OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOUSE BYLAW 12/05V

Chapter79 NOISE. [IDSTORY: Adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Vernon by L.L. No Amendments noted where applicable.

GLOUCESTERSHIRE WARWICKSHIRE STEAM RAILWAY PLC BYELAWS

BY-LAW NO A BY-LAW OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF BRACEBRIDGE TO PROHIBIT AND REGULATE CERTAIN NOISES WITHIN THE TOWN OF BRACEBRIDGE

McHenry County Noise Ordinance. Preamble

WASTE POLICY AND ENFORCEMENT STRATEGY

Transcription:

South Australia s Environment Protection Authority Managing Nuisance Issues Stephen Potter Team Leader, Compliance Greg Marr Senior Environment Protection Officer Monica Bosco Coordinator Local Government Services

What will be covered Legislation nuisance management Complaints management Noise Subjective Assessment Wood heater smoke Example of complaint that EPA was involved in Odour 2 examples of complaints that EPA was involved in

What is nuisance? Local Nuisance and Litter Control Act 2016 Litter provisions effective from 1 February 2017 Nuisance Provisions effective from 1 July 2017. s7 (1) Subject to this Act, a council is the principal authority for dealing with local nuisance and littering in its area.

What is nuisance? Local Nuisance and Litter Control Act 2016 S 17 (1) For the purposes of this Act, local nuisance is (a) any adverse effect on an amenity value of an area that (i) is caused by (A) noise, odour, smoke, fumes, aerosols or dust; or (B) animals, whether dead or alive; or (C) any other agent or class of agent declared by Schedule 1; and (ii) unreasonably interferes with or is likely to interfere unreasonably with the enjoyment of the area by persons occupying a place within, or lawfully resorting to, the area; or

What is nuisance? (b) insanitary conditions on premises that unreasonably interfere with or are likely to interfere unreasonably with the enjoyment of premises occupied by persons in the vicinity; or (c) unsightly conditions, of a kind declared by Schedule 1, on premises caused by human activity or a failure to act; or (d) a contravention of, or failure to comply with a provision of an environment protection policy, or of any other Act or law, declared by Schedule 1; or (e) anything declared by Schedule 1 to constitute local nuisance, but does not include anything declared by Schedule 1 not to constitute local nuisance.

What is nuisance? Part of your assessment is establishing the following amenity value of an area includes any quality or condition of the area that conduces to its enjoyment premises means (a) any land, building (including residential premises) or place (including a public place, or a movable building or structure); or (b) a part of premises; enjoyment to have and use with satisfaction

What is nuisance? unreasonable interference annoying v unreasonable Most activity results in an impact of some description that the impact exists and perhaps constitutes an interference is not be enough to constitute local nuisance it must unreasonably interfere. Would a reasonable person tolerate the nuisance given the level, nature and extent?

What is nuisance - Schedule 1 Schedule 1 Gives additional meaning to Local Nuisance for the purpose of Section 17 Part 1 Defines terms used in the Schedule, this is in addition to section 17 Part 2 Specifies things that are local nuisance Part 3 Specifies thing that are not local nuisance

Complaints Management The primary goal is to achieve compliance in the most efficient, resourceful and effective way PROCESS!!! MANAGE CLIENT EXPECTATIONS COMMUNICATION REGULATION CLOSE COMPLAINT

Complaints Management Complaint received - validate the complaint is councils responsibility - validate there is a potential non-compliance (nuisance) - record complaint in a system Complaint management responsibilities Council professional, impartial, efficient - communication - transparent - courtesy and respect - regulator

Complaints Management Complaint management responsibilities Complainant - Identify themselves - Identify issues - provide information - co-operate - courtesy and respect - incident diary If the complainant is not willing to meet their responsibilities set limits or decline to take any action on the complaint.

Complaints Management EPA recommends using a staged approach to managing nuisance complaints - Prioritisation of the complaint - Stage 1 Validation of complaint - Stage 2 Investigation - Stage 3 Regulatory Action or closing of complaint

Complaints Management Prioritisation Ensures appropriate allocation of resources Allocate the complaint a priority ranking - human health impacts - environmental impacts - broad temporal or spatial impacts - number of people affected

Complaints Management Stage 1 Validation of the complaint Complainant - explain the process of how it will be managed - provide information - incident diary Alleged offender - advise a complaint has been received - advise of their obligations - explain the process of how it will be managed - consequences of non compliance THE BEST OUTCOME IS FOR THEM TO RESOLVE THEIR ISSUE THEMSELVES

Complaints Management Incident Diary This should be provided to the complainant as soon as possible. The incident diary serves a number of purposes: Description of the problem Frequency Patterns When to target inspections If meteorological conditions are relevant

Complaints Management Stage 2 Investigation If issue not resolved in Stage 1, proceed to stage 2. Review incident diary and information supplied Validate the complaint by inspection This may require multiple inspections at the time the nuisance is occurring Develop a regulatory plan of action

Complaints Management Stage 3 Regulatory action If non- compliance confirmed in Stage 2 The purpose of regulatory action is to secure compliance with the Act Regulatory tools Warning letter Expiation Abatement Notice Prosecution Monitor the progress and establish a date by which they are to comply.

Complaints Management Stage 4 Compliance achieved or environmental nuisance not validated Advise the complainant and the offender that: - no non-compliance has been found - the non compliance has been resolved to the satisfaction of the council CLOSE THE COMPLAINT

Assessment of Nuisance Regulation 7 For the purposes of 21 (d) of the Act, if, in determining the presence of local nuisance, Section 17 (1) (including a provision referred to by that Section) requires an AO to form an opinion about a matter, the officer may form the opinion based on the officer s own senses.

Section 50 Evidentiary provisions (1)In proceedings under this Act, where it is alleged that a person caused Local Nuisance within the meaning of section 17(1)(a) or (b), evidence collected by an AO that he/she formed the opinion based on his or her own senses that (a) the agent alleged to have caused the local nuisance (when discharged or emitted from a place occupied or a vehicle owned by the person) travelled to a place occupied by another person; and (b) the level, nature or extent of the agent within the place occupied by the other person was such as to constitute an unreasonable interference with a person s enjoyment of the place, constitutes proof, in the absence of proof to the contrary, of those matters.

The Subjective Assessment of Nuisance For an activity to be deemed to be causing a local nuisance an authorised officer has to form an opinion that the emitted pollutant unreasonably interferes with a person s enjoyment of a place. The position that an officer selects to assess the nuisance is critical. It should only include places where people would be expected to frequent. Many activities results in a form of external emission. The fact that an emission is observable and may be annoying does not mean that it is a nuisance. A nuisance could be described as something that is both uncommon within the community and annoying at an extreme level.

The Subjective Assessment of Nuisance A legal nuisance should not include common activities that may interfere with a neighbours enjoyment of a place such as mowing a lawn, construction, the use of a wood-heater, normal business activities if they occur at normal times, for normal durations and at a normal frequency of occurrence. The following considerations provide some guidance on the factors that may be relevant in subjectively deciding whether an activity is causing a nuisance; Is the emission significant in an absolute sense, or relative to background conditions? Dust

The Subjective Assessment of Nuisance Does the emission have any special characteristics that are significantly different to those that might otherwise be expected in the area? Noise in particular can contain characteristics that aggravate its level of annoyance. Odour can be assessed by both strength and character Dust may have characteristics that should be taken into account when assessing ie dust from a contaminated site. Is the time of the day a significant factor in assessing the emission? Examples, 4am, 7am, 4pm, 7pm, 10pm

The Subjective Assessment of Nuisance Is the duration of the activity a significant factor in assessing the emission? All day, part day or intermittent? Is the emission adversely affecting nearby activities? Is the emission affecting other people? How many people are affected? How easy would it be to control emissions from the activity? This is where an officer would look at the activity and determine if reasonable measures are being taken to control any external impact of the activity.

The Subjective Assessment of Nuisance Is the emission common when other people are carrying out a similar activity? Is the activity affecting people inside a building? Does the activity interfere with other people s normal activities? Not all of the factors need to be present for an opinion to be formed that the activity is causing an unreasonable interference. Ultimately, the level, nature and/or extent of the relevant emission are important criteria, and reasonable judgment must be used to decide what is acceptable in a given situation.

Nuisance is the law of common sense A nuisance only occurs if a person is affected Some activities that are recognized as being reasonably, but still having a significant impact on people are allowed but only within certain hours. These times have been selected to balance the interests of all parties Construction 7am to 7pm Monday to Saturday (if people will be affected by noise) Domestic Power Tools (occasional use) 8am-8pm (9am-8pm on Sundays) These times do not suit everyone. The rules cannot please everyone (ie shift workers).

Some guidance You may wish to adopt, or consider the EPA s guide of defining daytime as 7am to 10pm and night-time as 10pm on any day until 7am on the next day. Any activity that should only occur during day-time can occur at any time during the hours defined as day-time. This allows a balance between business and residential interests. An example pickups (including waste) and deliveries. If no-one is bothered there should be no restriction. But where a complaint arises and nuisance is likely then the person undertaking the activity should be advised to restrict activities to day-time.

The legal standard If you have conducted an investigation to the point you are satisfied that there is no legal breach then options are; A person undertaking an activity could be asked to voluntarily take some steps to satisfy a complaint, or A person who is affected by an activity that is not a nuisance must make their own arrangements to achieve a level of comfort. This may include; People with asthma or other conditions who take issue with the normal operation of a wood heater. People who are sensitized to anything. Shift workers who complain about normal daytime activities People with unrealistic expectations People do not like being told this. Even helpful suggestions may be met with aggression. Try to be sensitive.

Wood smoke example Complaint received. Initial letters sent to source and complainant. Diary received indicating started around 5 6pm daily. Carried out 1 site visit before this site visit. Level of smoke was constant for over 1 hour.

Schedule 1 (d) smoke generated on premises, (i) if an AO forms the opinion that; (A) the smoke has travelled to neighbouring premises: and (B) the nature, extent, smell, density or texture of the smoke is such as to constitute an unreasonable interference with the enjoyment of neighbouring premises by persons occupying those premises; or

Schedule 1 (ii) without limiting the generality of subparagraph (i), in the case of smoke from a solid fuel heater (A) a visible plume of smoke extends into the air above neighbouring premises from the flue of the chimney of the heater more than 15 minutes after it was lit; and (B) an AO forms the opinion that the nature, extent, colour, smell or density of the smoke is such as to constitute an unreasonable interference with the enjoyment of neighbouring premises by persons occupying those premises;

Wood smoke example Sent a letter to alleged asking them to contact us to discuss the excessive smoke. Visited the home of source of the smoke. Inspected the wood and wood heater. Asked if he could light the fire. Process looked good but smoke still excessive. Indicator showed that air intake fully open, however when door opened smoke from flue reduced. They agreed to get someone to service. Found air intake was blocked.

Wood smoke example Smoke level deemed acceptable.

Odour BBQ Chicken takeaway Council officers asked for assistance as store has installed state of the art exhaust system, but Council were still getting odour complaints.

Schedule 1- Odour (b) Odour generated on Premises, if AO forms the opinion that; (i) the odour has travelled to neighbouring premises; and (ii) the nature, intensity or extent of the odour is such as to constitute an unreasonable interference with the enjoyment of the neighbouring premises by persons occupying those premises;

Odour BBQ Chicken takeaway Asked complainant for a diary, they were not happy, but insisted on a week diary prior to any action. Diary returned indicating bad odours from 10am to 10pm every day. Carried out 2 site visits during the day and no odours detected at front of complainant s property. Wind direction was suitable to carry out a site inspection Discussed with complainant. They identified that Friday and Sunday evenings were the busiest periods and the worst odours.

Odour BBQ Chicken takeaway Carried out monitoring on 2 Sundays and only very slight odours. Explained to complainant that business is compliant, their comment was We don t like it so it should not be allowed Activity was conducted with Development approval and with industry standard equipment. Closed the case correspondence sent to complainant.

Spray booth complaint example First complaint received regarding this site was paint fall out onto cars. Stage 1 letters sent to complainant and source. Inspected complainant site. - Dried paint found in car park and on cars. Complainant stated that it was intermittent.

Spray booth paint fall out Inspected spray painting facilities and looked at filters. They had torturous path filtration. When cleaned the booth the dried paint pieces went through the torturous path. Filters changed.

Spray booth odour Odour complaints also received (separate complainants) - Stage 1 correspondence sent as complaint was separate issue. Diaries received. - reviewed diaries and developed monitoring plan Monitoring carried out. - Odours experienced, visited the site. The practice when busy was to remove painted parts from booth to allow to cure outside. Explained why practice was not acceptable.

Schedule 1- Part 3 Things that are not local nuisance for the purposes of 17 (1); (a) noise or other nuisance from blasting operations carried out as part of a mining operation within the meaning of the Mines and Works Inspection Act 1920 or Mining Act 1971; (b) noise or other nuisance from any activity carried out in accordance with a program for environment protection and rehabilitation that is in force fpr mining operations under Part 10A of the Mining Act 1971; (c) noise or other nuisance from the keeping of animals in accordance with a development authorisation within the meaning of the Development Act, 1993;

Schedule 1- Part 3 (ca) noise, odour or waste from animals living in their natural habitat (other than such animals that have been actively encouraged, by feeding, to gather in a particular area); (d) noise or other nuisance from any other activity carried on in accordance with an authorisation (including approval, consent, licence, permit, exemption or entitlement) granted under any other Act (other than this Act), provided that (i) the authorisation imposes requirements to control, minimise or eliminate (as far as reasonably practicable) any noise or other forms of nuisance likely to result from the activity; and (ii) those requirements are complied with;

Schedule 1- Part 3 (e) noise or other nuisance from fireworks; (f) noise or other nuisance from sporting or associated activities at sporting venues; (g) noise or other nuisance from community events run by or on behalf of the council (subject to any conditions imposed by council); (h) noise from public infrastructure works; (i) subject to Part 2 Clause 4(1)(a)(i)(D), noise from vehicles (other than vehicles operating within, or entering or leaving business premises);

Schedule 1- Part 3 (j) noise or other nuisance that may be the subject of proceedings under (i) the Community Titles Act, 1996; or (ii) the Strata Titles Act, 1988; or (iii) the Residential Tenancies Act, 1995; (k) an activity on, or noise emanating from, licensed premises within the meaning of the Liquor Licensing Act, 1997, in respect of which a complaint may be lodged with the LL Commissioner under Section 106 of that Act; (l) behaviour in respect of which a complaint may be lodged with the LL Commissioner under Section 106 of the Liquor Licensing Act, 1997;

Schedule 1- Part 3 (m) noise principally consisting of music or voices, or both, resulting from an activity at domestic premises; (n) noise from activities carried on in the normal course of a school, kindergarten, child care centre or place or worship; (o) noise created by a dog barking or otherwise that may be the subject of an offence under Section 45A(5) of the Dog and Cat Management Act, 1995; (p) aircraft or railway noise; (q) noise Caused by emergency vehicle sirens; (r) noise outside of the human audible range

Questions?