U.S. Department of Commerce Will Resume the Collection of Duties on Mexican Sugar if Negotiations Fail

Similar documents
Agreement Suspending the Antidumping Duty Investigation on Sugar from Mexico (as amended); Preliminary Results of 2017 Administrative Review

Antidumping Suspension Agreement on Sugar from Mexico: Rescission of and Administrative Reviews

Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce

Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Mexico: Final Results and Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation of 100- to 150-Seat Large Civil Aircraft from Canada

Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube from the People s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

Slip Op. UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that citric

Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from Japan and the United Kingdom: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;

Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Department) is conducting an administrative

19 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

Certain Pasta from Italy: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;

Certain Uncoated Paper from Indonesia: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination

Lemon Juice from Argentina: Continuation of Suspension of Antidumping Investigation

Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty

Certain Cased Pencils from the People s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;

( ) Page: 1/5 UNITED STATES ANTI-DUMPING AND COUNTERVAILING MEASURES ON CERTAIN COATED PAPER FROM INDONESIA

Steel Wire Garment Hangers from the People s Republic of China: Affirmative Final Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty Order

Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony with Final Results, Notice of Amended Final Results

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that

Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce

Steel Wire Garment Hangers from Taiwan: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less than Fair Value

Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Turkey: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce

Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation

Certain Steel Wheels from the People s Republic: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation

Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce

Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce

Trade between Mexico and Vietnam on certain textiles and apparel goods under the Short Supply List and on babies garments

Laminated Woven Sacks from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation

Certain Pasta from Italy: Initiation and Preliminary Results of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances Reviews

TRADE REMEDIES. Side-by-Side Chart Trade Remedies

Barcode: C INV - Investigation -

Initiation and Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review:

Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce

Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Expedited Review

In Brief PROCEDURES FOR MAKING A REQUEST FOR A RE-DETERMINATION OR AN APPEAL UNDER THE SPECIAL IMPORT MEASURES ACT

Raw Flexible Magnets from the People s Republic of China and Taiwan: Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders

CASSIDY LEVY KENT (USA) LLP

Determinations of Adequacy in Sunset Reviews of Antidumping Orders in the United States

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

19 USC 1673a. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION. [Investigation Nos. 701-TA-610 and 731-TA (Preliminary)]

Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People s Republic of China: Initiation of Anti-Circumvention Inquiry

ORDINANCE ON ANTI-DUMPING OF IMPORTED PRODUCTS INTO VIETNAM

CHAPTER 8 TRADE REMEDIES. Section I

Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

Certain Pasta from Turkey: Final Results of the Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order

ANNEX IV SAFEGUARD MEASURES. Part I: Global Safeguards. Article 1

The House Report on the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act

Doping: Argentina's new anti-doping law

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION. Investigation Nos. 701-TA-556 and 731-TA-1311 (Final) Truck and Bus Tires from China

GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE

v Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP Legal Counsel

REGULATION SOMERSET HILLS BOARD OF EDUCATION. TEACHING STAFF MEMBERS R 3144/Page 1 of 8 CERTIFICATION OF TENURE CHARGES

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/23/18 Page 2 of Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(e) and 5 U.S.C.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Trademark Regulations Title 37 - Code of Federal Regulations as amended on June 11, 2015, effective July 17, 2015.

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING PREPARATION Executive Committee: May 28, 2013 Amended: January 14, 2014

UNITED STATES SECTION 129(c)(1) OF THE URUGUAY ROUND AGREEMENTS ACT

Bylaws of the Solivita Smashers Pickleball Club

Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2015

County of Santa Clara Finance Agency Controller-Treasurer

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

CLAIMANTS' REPLY TO UNITED STATES' ANSWERS TO THE TRIBUNAL'S ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS IN RELATION TO THE BYRD AMENDMENT

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

GUIDE FOR LICENSING OF CLEARING AGENTS

Utility Scale Wind Towers from the People s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order

Certain Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Turkey: Amended Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 2013

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

WTO Decisions and Their Effect in U.S. Law

CANFOR CORPORATION AND TERMINAL FOREST PRODUCTS LTD., Claimants/Investors, -and- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent/Party.

Limited. EU Mercosur negotiations. Chapter on Goods Draft consolidated text. Joint Text November 2017 XXX BNC/MCS-EU

Recent Developments in NAFTA Law

Nova Scotia Department of Health Continuing Care Branch. Financial Decision Review Policy

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION. Investigation Nos. 701-TA-563 and 731-TA (Final) Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India, Italy and Spain

Poliducto Frontera REPRESENTATIONS. a) It s a company duly incorporated and organized pursuant the laws of Mexico;

Modernizing Canada s Trade Remedy System:

8, DAYS PRIOR TO THE ANNUAL SCHOOL ELECTION

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF GUELPH. Act means the Municipal Act, 2001, c.25 as amended or replaced from time to time.

SUPERINTENDENT HOLDINGFORD PUBLIC SCHOOLS

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC REGARDING WORKING HOLIDAY VISAS

Korean Intellectual Property Office

Issue Committees. A major purpose of supporting or opposing any ballot issue or ballot question; and 22 P a g e

Page 1 of 11. Kriss Worthington

Case 6:15-cv TC Document 144 Filed 04/24/17 Page 1 of 6

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Tariff. Appendix B.16 Pseudo-Tie Participating Generator Agreement

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SAVANNAH DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS PIEDMONT BRANCH 1590 ADAMSON PARKWAY, SUITE 200 MORROW, GEORGIA

PREFERENTIAL TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SOUTHERN COMMON MARKET (MERCOSUR) AND THE SOUTHERN AFRICAN CUSTOMS UNION (SACU)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Rules of Procedure of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union

A CITIZEN S GUIDE TO FILING A DISPARATE IMPACT ENVIRONMENTAL DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT WITH THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY UNDER

Transcription:

U.S. Department of Commerce Will Resume the Collection of Duties on Mexican Sugar if Negotiations Fail WASHINGTON Today, after negotiations reached an impasse, the Department of Commerce formally notified the Government of Mexico its intention to resume the collection of antidumping and countervailing duties on sugar imports on June 5, 2017, unless an agreement is reached. While I regret that such measures were needed, it is my hope that Mexico and the United States can reach a fair agreement before June, said Secretary Ross. If no agreement is reached by June 5, 2017 then the antidumping and countervailing duty orders that are presently suspended will become operative and cash deposits on imports will be required. Background: In 2014, Commerce reached final affirmative determinations in antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) investigations regarding sugar imported from Mexico. In addition, the International Trade Commission found that the U.S. industry was being injured by reason of imports of sugar from Mexico. However in 2014, an agreements was signed with the Government of Mexico and Mexican sugar producers that suspended AD and CVD duties on imports of sugar from Mexico. In 2016, The American Sugar Coalition raised concerns with Commerce about the operation of the agreements, and petitioned Commerce to formally review whether the agreements continue to meet the applicable requirements of U.S. law. In December, 2016 Commerce issued preliminary findings that the agreements may not be working. In March of 2016, U.S. Secretary of Commerce Wilbur L. Ross, Jr. and his Mexican Counterpart Secretary of Economy Ildefonso Guajardo Villarreal announced a renewed effort to resolve ongoing issues with Mexican sugar export and anti - bunching limits. Notifying Letters: May 1, 2017 Juan Cortina Gallardo President Camara Nacional de Las Industrias Azucarera y Alcoholera Additional Signatories Batory De Mexico, S. DE R.L. DE C.V. A-201-845 Administrative Review- Suspension Agreement

Public Document IT A/E&C/P&N/OP/BAU :de Agroindustrias San Patricio S.A. de C.V. (San Patricio) Comercializadora Axiv S.A. de C.V. (Comercializadora Axiv) Comercializadora y Procesadora de Productos y Alimentos, S.A. de C.V. ("CPPA") REFERENCE: Agreement Suspending the Antidumping Duty Investigation on Sugar from Mexico Dear Mr. Cortina and Additional Signatories: On behalf of the United States Department of Commerce ("Department"), I am writing to you with respect to the above - referenced Agreement Suspending the Antidumping Duty Investigation on Sugar from Mexico ("AD Agreement"). The Department appreciates the work of the Mexican producers and exporters and our combined efforts to preserve and maintain a viable AD suspension agreement on sugar from Mexico since December 2014. However, despite everyone's best efforts and numerous meetings, there remain outstanding issues between the parties. At this point, because the signatories of the AD Agreement have not reached agreement on modifications to the AD Agreement, the Department is notifying the Mexican producers and exporters of its intent to exercise its option under Section X.B of the AD Agreement to terminate such agreement, unless the parties reach agreement upon resolution of the outstanding issues with the current AD Agreement. It continues to be our sincere hope that a negotiated settlement can be reached. The Department will devote all necessary resources to work with the parties to this end. This letter constitutes written notice that the Department intends to terminate the AD Agreement

on June 5, 2017, unless a revised agreement is reached on or before that date. The Department therefore intends to issue an antidumping duty order on Sugar from Mexico on June 5, 2017, unless a revised agreement can be reached on or before that date. If you have any questions on this notification, please contact me at (202) 482-2104 or Carole Showers, Executive Director of the, at (202) 482-3217. Sincerely, Ronald K. Lorentzen Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance May 1, 2017 Aristeo Lopez Legal Counsel for International Trade Ministry of the Economy of Mexico Government of Mexico Washington, D.C. 20036 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Washington. 0 C. 20230 C-201-846 Administrative Review- Suspension Agreement Public Document IT A/E&C/P&N/OP/BAU:DC

REFERENCE: Agreement Suspending the Countervailing Duty Investigation on Sugar from Mexico Dear Mr. Lopez: On behalf of the United States Department of Commerce ("Department"), I am writing to you with respect to the above - referenced Agreement Suspending the Countervailing Duty Investigation on Sugar from Mexico ("CVD Agreement"). The Department appreciates the work of the Government of Mexico and our combined efforts to preserve and maintain a viable CVD suspension agreement on sugar from Mexico since December 2014. However, despite everyone's best efforts and numerous meetings, there remain outstanding issues between the parties. At this point, because the signatories of the CVD Agreement have not reached agreement on modifications to the CVD Agreement, the Department is notifying the Government of Mexico of its intent to exercise its option under Section XI.B of the CVD Agreement to tenninate such agreement, unless the parties reach agreement upon resolution of the outstanding issues with the cunent CVD Agreement. It continues to be our sincere hope that a negotiated settlement can be reached. The Department will,devote all necessary resources to work with the parties to this end. This letter constitutes written notice that the Department intends to terminate the CVD Agreement on June 5, 2017, unless a revised agreement is reached on or before that date. The Department therefore intends to issue a countervailing duty order on Sugar from Mexico on June 5, 2017, unless a revised agreement can be reached on or before that date. Jf you have any questions on this notification, please contact me at (202) 482-2104 or Carole Showers, Executive Director of the, at (202) 482-3217.

Sincerely, Ronald K. Lorentzen Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance DATE: May 1, 2017 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE lnt:arnatlonal Trade Administration Washington, D.C. 20230 A-201-845 Administrative Review- Suspension Agreement POR: 12/19 /14-11/30 /15 Public Document ITA/E&C/P&N/OP/BAU: dwc MEMORANDUM TO: Carole Showers Executive Director Sally C. Gannon. CfbA. Director for Bila~eements.

Sugar from Mexico: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Agreement Suspending the Antidumping Duty Investigation on Sugar from Mexico BACKGROUND At the request of interested parties, the Department of Commerce (the Department) initiated an administrative review of the Agreement Suspending the Antidumping Duty Investigation on Sugar from Mexico, covering the period December 19, 2014, through November 30, 2015.1 The Department published its Preliminary Results on December 5, 2016.2 EXTENSION OF TIME LIMIT FOR FINAL RESULTS Section 751 (a)(3)(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires the Department to complete the results of an administrative review within 120 days after the date on which the preliminary determination is published. However, if it is not practicable to complete the review within that time period, section 75l(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to extend that 120 - day period to a maximum of 180 days after the date of publication of the preliminary results. 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 6832, 6839 (February 9, 2016). 2 See Antidumping Duty Suspension Agreement on Sugar From Mexico; Administrative Review, 81 FR 87541 (December 5, 2016). On March 10, 2017, we determined that it was not practicable to complete this review by the previous deadline of April 4, 2017, and extended the deadline to May 1, 2017.3 We are recommending fully extending the deadline for this review to no later than June 5, 2017.4 Therefore, we recommend extending the time period for issuing the final results of this administrative review to no later than June 5, 2017.

Agree Carole Showers Executive Director Disagree DATE: May 1, 2017 Carole Showers Executive Director FROM: Sally C. Gannon Director for Bila~ements C-201-846 Administrative Review Suspension Agreement POR: 12/19 /14-12/31 /15 Public Document

ITNE&C/P&N/OP/BAU: dwc SUBJECT: Sugar from Mexico: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Agreement Suspending the Countervailing Duty Investigation on Sugar from Mexico BACKGROUND At the request of interested parties, the Department of Commerce (the Department) initiated an administrative review of the Agreement Suspending the Countervailing Duty Investigation on Sugar from Mexico, covering the period December 19, 2014, through December 31, 2015.1 The Department published its Preliminary Results on December 5, 2016.2 EXTENSION OF TIME LIMIT FOR FINAL RESULTS Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires the Department to complete the results of an administrative review within 120 days after the date on which the preliminary determination is published. However, if it is not practicable to complete the review within the time period, section 75l(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to extend that 120 - day period to a maximwn of 180 days after the date of publication of the preliminary results. 1 See initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 6832, 6839 (February 9, 2016); Suspension Agreement on Sugar From Mexico; Administrative Review of the Agreement Suspending the Countervailing Duty investigation on Sugar From Mexico, 81 FR 87539, 87540 (December 5, 2016) (Preliminary Results) (noting that the original period ofreview was extended to include calendar year 2015). 2 See Preliminary Results.

On March 10, 2017, we determined that it was not practicable to complete this review by the previous deadline of April 4, 2017, and extended the deadline to May 1, 2017. 3 We are recommending fully extending the deadline for this review to no later than June 5, 2017.4 Therefore, we recommend extending the time period for issuing the final results of this administrative review to no later than June 5, 2017. Agree Disagree Carole Showers Executive Director 3 See Memorandum to Carole Showers entitled "Sugar from Mexico: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Agreement Suspending the Anti - Dumping Investigation on Sugar from Mexico." March 10, 2017. 4 The maximum extension permitted is 60 days from the date of the original results, which falls on Saturday, June 3, 2017. The Department's practice dictates that where a deadline falls on a weekend or federal holiday, the appropriate deadline is the next business day. See Notice of Clarification: Application of"next Business Day" Rule for Administrative Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). ###