Case 1:11-cr JDB Document 6 Filed 03/03/11 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Holding a Criminal Term

Similar documents
Case 1:14-cr MLW Document 1 Filed 07/15/14 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:07-cr JR Document 2 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Holding a Criminal Term

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. The SPECIAL JULY 2013 GRAND JURY charges:

22 Beginning at a date unknown to the grand jury and continuing up. 23 to and including October 15, 2014, within the Southern District of

Colorado Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION INTRODUCTION. A. Background

religious movement that effectively ruled Afghanistan from the mid-1990s until the United States1 military intervention in

Case 5:18-cr DDC Document 1 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 5. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (Topeka Docket)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OFHCALIFORNIA. June 2008 Grand Jury ) Case No. '10 CR W ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) (1),

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. 10 -

2:18-cr DCN Date Filed 11/14/18 Entry Number 3 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. v. Crim. No. I N D I C T M E N T. The Grand Jury in and for the District of New Jersey,

(Attempt to Provide Material Support to a Foreign Terrorist Organization) 1. On or about and between May 15, 2014 and January 12, 2015, both dates

Case 1:18-cr PLM ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/18 PageID.1 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION _

Case 4:14-cr HLM-WEJ Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 1 of 7

x : : : : : : : : : : x COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Commit Bribery) The United States Attorney charges:

FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:17-cr JLS Document 1 Filed 04/26/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF falifornia

I l'_ r: MKM::MKP/TH F. #2017R01840

Case 1:09-cr GBL Document 27 Filed 05/06/2009 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ) ) ) INDICTMENT

Case 1:15-cr DPW Document 1 Filed 09/29/15 Page 1 of 8

- -X - - -X. COUNT ONE (Attempt to Provide Material Support to a Foreign Terrorist Organization)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT BOWLING GREEN NO. 21 U.S.C. 846

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. October 2013 Grand Jury. CR No. 18R c INTRODUCTORY ALLEGATIONS

(T. 21, U.S.C., 848(a), ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA, 848(b), 848(c), 853 (p), IGNACIO CORONEL VILLAREAL, 960(b)(1)(B)(ii) and 963;

Case 2:15-cr DN-DBP Document 1 Filed 08/26/15 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

1. At times material to this indictment:

Case 1:18-cr NGG Document 14 Filed 04/19/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 61. COUNT ONE (Sex Trafficking - Jane Does 1 and 2)

Case 2:19-cr RGD-RJK Document 3 Filed 02/07/19 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

-v.- : SEALED INDICTMENT

SEALED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 7:14-cr RAJ Document 1 Filed 06/25/14 Page 1 of 5 SEALED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION

Case 5:15-cr TBR Document 1 Filed 06/01/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1. From at least in or about June 2006, up to and

IN THE DISTMCT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES For the Western District of New York

INTRODUCTION TO ALL COUNTS. At all times relevant to this Superseding Indictment, The Enterprise. 1. The members and associates of the Bonanno

CRIMINAL NO. j(j)cr }03>l^D

Case 1:16-cr GPG Document 1 Filed 03/11/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRI DALLAS DIVISION 5 CR NO. 3:02-CR-052-R INTRODUCTION

Case 1:19-cr RBK Document 1 Filed 03/13/19 Page 1 of 31 PageID: 1

Case 2:17-cr PLM ECF No. 54 filed 12/05/17 PageID.113 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Case 8:18-cr JLS Document 1 Filed 04/27/18 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1

Case 3:18-mj JLB Document 1 Filed 08/08/18 PageID.1 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:17-cr PLM ECF No. 15 filed 11/21/17 PageID.22 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Trafficking People and Involuntary Servitude

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:10-cr LMB Document 2 Filed 02/05/10 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR. Alexandria Division

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. 18 u.s.c. 981, 982, 1001, 1014 I 1028A, 1343, 1503 I 1519, 1957 and 2; 28 u. s.c.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Forfeiture INDICTMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE

) ) Count 1: 18 U.S.C. 1349

Case 1:13-cr RP-RAW Document 2 Filed 11/25/13 Page 1 of 6. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF row A

Alien Smuggling: Recent Legislative Developments

Alien Smuggling: Recent Legislative Developments

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIKiINIA. Alexandria Division SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT. General Allegations

Case 6:08-cr CJS Document 76 Filed 05/07/2008 Page 1 of 6 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. For the Western District of New York

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 24, 2016 (202) TTY (866)

Case 1:15-cr NGG Document 11 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: X - - -X

Case 1:15-cr CG-B Document 1 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of F="!L.f:D 11 ltv Or--.

Case 1:15-cr JCC Document 1 Filed 03/19/15 Page 1 of 20 PageID# 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

8 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COUNT 1 (Conspiracy) THE DEFENDANTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case 1:15-cr WJM Document 18 Filed 05/19/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 2:12-cr CM-JPO Document 1 Filed 01/25/12 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (KANSAS CITY DOCKET)

4:18-cr JMG-CRZ Doc # 1 Filed: 07/17/18 Page 1 of 14 - Page ID # 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COUNT ONE. (Conspiracy to Bomb Places of Public Use in India)

..'[ ~se~...j 'it ~..',::/ ~. _,- ':",'- /~.:-::' l _,. :.,', UNITEJ5~.vSTATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

authorization for such export, in violation of Title 22, U.S.C. 2778(b)(2) & 2778(c) and Title

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CRIMINAL NO (DWF) THE UNITED STATES GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:15-cr DPW Document 1 Filed 09/29/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. DEADLINE.com.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 0:13-cr KAM Document 76 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/19/2014 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

v. CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS: (i")

CRIMINAL NO. 2:17cr 3^

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COUNT ONE I. THE ENTERPRISE

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO GRAND JURY [YYYY] The [Day, i.e. 12th] Day of [Month, Year] Plaintiff.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:99-cr DJC Document 1323 Filed 09/20/13 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/07/17 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VISITING EXPERTS PAPERS

Case 1:05-cr PAS Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/01/2005 Page 1 of 8 SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT

Case 4:17-cr MSD-LRL Document 89 Filed 03/14/18 Page 1 of 27 PageID# 1321

Background. The Defendant. 1. From in or around 2007 through in or around January 2017,

muia'aiena ED) wnrn 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:09-cv LO-TCB Document 1 Filed 01/06/09 Page 1 of 20 PageID# 1

Transcription:

Case 111-cr-00056-JDB Document 6 Filed 03/03/11 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Holding a Criminal Term Grand Jury Sworn in on November 12, 2010 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. IRFAN UL HAQ, also known as Irfan Chohan, QASIM ALI, also known as Ali Qasim and Fauji, and, ZAHID YOUSAF, also known as Zahid Quereshi, Defendants. CRIMINAL NO. 11-056 (JDB) GRAND JURY ORIGINAL VIOLATIONS 18 U.S.C. 371 (Conspiracy) 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii) (Attempt to Bring an Alien to the United States for Financial Gain) 18 U.S.C. 2 (Aiding and Abetting and Causing an Act to Be Done) 8 U.S.C. 1324(b) and 18 U.S.C. 982(a)(6) (Criminal Forfeiture) I N D I C T M E N T The Grand Jury charges that COUNT ONE At all times relevant to this Indictment Introduction 1. Defendant IRFAN UL HAQ, also known as Irfan Chohan, and defendant QASIM ALI, also known as Ali Qasim and Fauji, are citizens of Pakistan and Ecuador. Defendant ZAHID YOUSAF, also known as Zahid Quereshi, is a citizen of Pakistan.

Case 111-cr-00056-JDB Document 6 Filed 03/03/11 Page 2 of 9 2. The Islamic Republic of Pakistan ( Pakistan ) is a country in South Asia that is bordered by the countries of Iran, Afghanistan, China, and India, and by the Indian Ocean. The Republic of Ecuador ( Ecuador ) is a country in South America that is bordered by the countries of Colombia and Peru, and by the Pacific Ocean. 3. Laws and regulations of the United States require citizens of Pakistan to obtain a valid United States visa and to have a valid identification document before coming to the United States to visit, work or reside. 4. All offenses alleged in this Indictment were begun and committed in Ecuador, Pakistan, and elsewhere outside the jurisdiction of any particular state or district of the United States, but within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the United States and therefore, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3238, within the venue of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. 5. From on or about January 3, 2011, and continuing through on or about March 3, 2011, in Ecuador, Pakistan, and elsewhere outside the United States, defendants IRFAN UL HAQ, also known as Irfan Chohan, QASIM ALI, also known as Ali Qasim and Fauji, and ZAHID YOUSAF, also known as Zahid Quereshi, knowingly combined, conspired, confederated, and agreed with each other and others both known and unknown to the Grand Jury, to commit offenses against the United States, more particularly (a) to bring to and attempt to bring to the United States, an alien, for the purpose of commercial advantage and private financial gain, knowing and in reckless disregard of the fact that such alien 2

Case 111-cr-00056-JDB Document 6 Filed 03/03/11 Page 3 of 9 had not received prior official authorization to come to, enter, and reside in the United States, regardless of any official action which may later be taken with respect to such alien, in violation of Title 8, United States Code, Section 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii); and, (b) to knowingly encourage and induce an alien to come to, enter, and reside in the United States, for the purpose of commercial advantage and private financial gain, knowing and in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, and residence was and would be in violation of law, in violation of Title 8, United States Code, Sections 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) and 1324(a)(1)(B)(i). Object of the Conspiracy 6. The purpose and object of the conspiracy was to make money by assisting an alien to illegally travel to and enter the United States. Manner and Means of the Conspiracy 7. The conspirators and their unindicted co-conspirators would and did use the following manner and means, among others, to accomplish the object of the conspiracy (a) Used Internet-based communications (such as e-mail and voice over internet protocol, known as VOIP ) and telephones to further their alien smuggling operation in various ways, including to communicate with each other and other co-conspirators to discuss the smuggling operation, to negotiate the smuggling fees for the alien who was to be smuggled into the United States, to coordinate and implement smuggling arrangements and events, including the provision of fraudulent identity and travel documents, and to resolve issues that arose in the smuggling operation. (b) Conducted their alien-smuggling operation through the use of a network of co-conspirators with whom they shared information and money obtained through their alien- 3

Case 111-cr-00056-JDB Document 6 Filed 03/03/11 Page 4 of 9 smuggling activities. (c) Attempted to transport from within Pakistan through the Carribean and South America and then into the United States, by various means of transportation, a person they believed to be an alien without a lawful right to come to, enter or reside in the United States. (d) Procured and provided fraudulent identification and travel documents. Overt Acts 8. In furtherance of the conspiracy and to accomplish the object of the conspiracy, one or more of the conspirators committed and caused to be committed at least one of various overt acts in Ecuador, Pakistan, and elsewhere within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the United States, including, but not limited to, the following (a) On or about January 3, 2011, in Ecuador, IRFAN UL HAQ had a conversation with an individual who was cooperating with and acting at the direction of law enforcement (a cooperating individual ), in which IRFAN UL HAQ agreed to smuggle from Pakistan to Ecuador a (fictitious) Pakistani person (the Pakistani Person ) for money, discussed the timing for obtaining fraudulent travel and identification documents, and recommended that the Pakistani Person meet with QASIM ALI to obtain a fraudulent passport. (b) On or about January 19, 2011, QASIM ALI, who was in Pakistan, spoke to a cooperating individual, who was in Ecuador, about obtaining fraudulent travel and identity documents for the Pakistani Person. (c) On or about January 21, 2011, QASIM ALI, who was in Pakistan, spoke via telephone to a cooperating individual, who was in Ecuador. The cooperating individual stated that the Pakistani Person was in hiding, needed to obtain a fraudulent passport, and would pay for 4

Case 111-cr-00056-JDB Document 6 Filed 03/03/11 Page 5 of 9 it. QASIM ALI responded that he would have the passport made. (d) On or about January 21, 2011, in Ecuador, IRFAN UL HAQ spoke to a cooperating individual, who informed IRFAN UL HAQ that the cooperating individual had talked with QASIM ALI about the Pakistani Person s passport, and that the Pakistani Person was willing to pay several thousand dollars. IRFAN UL HAQ stated that he would tell QASIM ALI to make a passport for the Pakistani Person. (e) On or about January 24, 2011, in Ecuador, IRFAN UL HAQ met with a cooperating individual and discussed various matters related to this smuggling operation, including the fees to be charged for obtaining fraudulent travel and identity documents, and the means by which payment would be made to the defendants. (f) On or about January 31, 2011, in Ecuador, IRFAN UL HAQ met with a cooperating individual and discussed various matters related to this smuggling operation, including obtaining fraudulent travel and identity documents for the Pakistani Person, and routes by which the Pakistani Person would be smuggled to the United States. (g) On or about February 1, 2011, in Ecuador, IRFAN UL HAQ accepted a down payment of approximately $2,000 via Western Union for his services in obtaining fraudulent identity and travel documents intended to facilitate the travel of the Pakistani Person. (h) On or about February 1, 2011, in Ecuador, IRFAN UL HAQ forwarded funds to a co-conspirator in Pakistan to be used for the purpose of obtaining fraudulent travel and identity documents for the Pakistani Person. (i) On or about February 1, 2011, in Ecuador, IRFAN UL HAQ contacted a co-conspirator in Pakistan to coordinate matters relating to the procurement of fraudulent travel 5

Case 111-cr-00056-JDB Document 6 Filed 03/03/11 Page 6 of 9 and identity documents for the Pakistani Person, including the means by which the Pakistani Person s photograph would be provided for use in preparing fraudulent travel and identity documents, and payment for the provision of these fraudulent documents. (j) On or about February 1, 2011, IRFAN UL HAQ, who was in Ecuador, communicated with QASIM ALI, who was in Pakistan, regarding matters relating to the procurement of fraudulent travel and identity documents for the Pakistani Person, including agreeing that QASIM ALI would coordinate the timely production of the fraudulent documents with another co-conspirator in Pakistan and that QASIM ALI would travel with the Pakistani Person. (k) On or about February 10, 2011, QASIM ALI, who was in Pakistan, spoke with a cooperating individual, who was in Ecuador, and discussed various matters related to this smuggling operation, including the status of QASIM ALI s efforts to obtain fraudulent travel and identification documents for the Pakistani Person, payment that QASIM ALI had received from IRFAN UL HAQ for this purpose, and that the destination for the Pakistani Person was the United States. (l) On or about February 19, 2011, in Ecuador, IRFAN UL HAQ and ZAHID YOUSAF met with a cooperating individual, during which meeting (1) IRFAN UL HAQ and ZAHID YOUSAF discussed their plans to smuggle the Pakistani Person from Pakistan to the United States; and (2) ZAHID YOUSAF provided the cooperating individual with a copy of fraudulent travel and identity documents for the Pakistani Person. (Conspiracy to Bring Aliens to the United States for Financial Gain and to Encourage and Induce Aliens to Come to the United States for Financial Gain, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371, and pursuant to Title 8, United State Code, Sections 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii), 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv), and 1324(a)(1)(B)(I)) 6

Case 111-cr-00056-JDB Document 6 Filed 03/03/11 Page 7 of 9 COUNT TWO 1. Paragraphs numbers 1 through 4 and 8 of Count One of this Indictment are realleged and incorporated as if fully set forth herein. 2. On or about January 3, 2011, and continuing through on or about March 3, 2011, in Ecuador, Pakistan, and elsewhere outside of the United States, defendants IRFAN UL HAQ, also known as Irfan Chohan, QASIM ALI, also known as Ali Qasim and Fauji, and ZAHID YOUSAF, also known as Zahid Quereshi, and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, aiding and abetting each other, knowingly attempted to bring an alien to the United States, for the purpose of commercial advantage and private financial gain, knowing and in reckless disregard of the fact that such alien had not received prior official authorization to come to, enter, and reside in the United States, regardless of any official action which may later be taken with respect to such alien. (Attempt to Bring an Alien to the United States for Financial Gain and Aiding and Abetting and Causing an Act to Be Done, in violation of Title 8, United States Code, Section 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii), and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2) 7

Case 111-cr-00056-JDB Document 6 Filed 03/03/11 Page 8 of 9 FORFEITURE ALLEGATION 1. The allegations contained in Counts One and Two of this Indictment are hereby realleged and incorporated by reference for the purpose of alleging forfeiture to the United States of America pursuant to the provisions of Title 8, United States Code, Section 1324(b), and Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a)(6). 2. As a result of the offenses alleged in Counts One and Two of this Indictment, defendants shall forfeit to the United States of America (1) any conveyance, including any vessel, vehicle, or aircraft, used in the commission of the offenses, (2) any and all property, real or personal, constituting, or derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offenses, and (3) any property used, or intended to be used, in any manner or part, to commit, or to facilitate the commission of such violations alleged in Counts One and Two of this Indictment. Such property includes, but is not limited to, the following Money Judgment judgment for a sum of money equal to the property constituting, or derived from, any and all proceeds the defendants obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of such violations alleged in Counts One and Two of this Indictment. 3. By virtue of the commission of the felony offenses charged in Counts One and Two of this Indictment, any and all interest that defendants have in the above-described property is vested in the United States and hereby forfeited to the United States pursuant to Title 8, United States Code, Section 1324(b), and Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a)(6). If any of the property described above as being subject to forfeiture, as a result of any act or omission of the defendants a. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; 8

Case 111-cr-00056-JDB Document 6 Filed 03/03/11 Page 9 of 9 b. has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third person; c. has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court; d. has been substantially diminished in value; or e. has been commingled with other property that cannot be subdivided without difficulty, it is the intention of the United States, pursuant to Title 8, United States Code, Section 1324(b), Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a)(6), and Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), to seek forfeiture of any other property of said defendants up to the value of said property listed above as being subject to forfeiture. (Criminal Forfeiture, in violation of Title 8, United States Code, Section 1324(b) and Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a)(6)) A TRUE BILL /s/ Attorney of the United States in and for the District of Columbia FOREPERSON 9