CIV CIV DS ORDR Order GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF

Similar documents
Case 2:18-cv R-AGR Document 7 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:26

CIV CIV DS MISC ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT filed

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING NOTICE, AND SCHEDULING FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION } } } } } } } } } } } } } } /

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 47 Filed: 10/11/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:299

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiff, j Judge: Hon. Joan M. Lewis ) ) )

Case 8:11-cv JST-JPR Document Filed 08/16/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:5240

Case 2:14-cv WBS-EFB Document 14 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 5

)

Case 3:16-cv SI Document 39 Filed 04/17/17 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:17-cv JAG Document 41 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 258

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

in furtherance of and in response to its Tentative Decision dated 1/4/2010 addressing various matters

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

"Uge EB JAN Daie Prodessod - By: %I, Y-.sT. wij ~1 ~

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. [Complaint Filed 11/24/2010] [Alameda County Case No.

Case 2:17-cv GAM Document 56 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:14-cv VEC Document 259 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

2:14-cv CAS-JEM Document 38 Filed 04/27/15 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

Case 3:17-cv VC Document Filed 09/06/18 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 214 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 8

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY ROCKARD J. DELGADILLO CITY ATTORNEY REPORT RE: COURT RULING

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

a. Name of person served:

Case 1:04-cv DAB Document 569 Filed 12/02/10 Page 1 of 8 SOUTHERN DISTIUCT OF NEW YORK..

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiffs and Appellants, Defendants and Res ondents.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Part Description 1 5 pages 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Motion for Summary Judgment

Case 6:05-cv ACC-DAB Document 56 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Case 3:09-cv JPG-PMF Document 47 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #466

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

If you were sent facsimile advertisements from TOMY, you could get a payment from a class action settlement.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF KERN, NORTH KERN DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:16-CV MHC

Case 1:17-cv WGY Document 65 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A

Case 2:03-cv RCJ-PAL Document 2907 Filed 06/05/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES NORTH CENTRAL DISTRICT (GLENDALE) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

AMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT GRANTING PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. TJ H Case No. 5:15-cv ~jc~-gjs

SAMPLE FORM F NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case 1:17-cv WTL-MPB Document 72 Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 736

Case 1:15-cv ELR Document 60 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 21

\ 'C,_ \) ~THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

FINALLY CERTIFYING A CLASS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. ORDER This matter came before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Modification of

Case 2:08-cv SHM-dkv Document 327 Filed 06/23/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 8969

Case 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ Document 95 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF CLASS NOTICE AND SCHEDULING A FINAL FAIRNESS HEARING

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

Fresno County Superior Court, Case No. 1OCECGO2 116 The Honorable Jeffrey Y. Hamilton, Judge

COURT Case 2 : 04-cv RC Document 264 Filed 11/08 /20 NOV ^ [CENL-7'^AL

prejudice on the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15

[~DJ FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. Judge CASE. Civil Action PETITION FOR RELIEF IN DISCOVERY DISPUTE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OMARI BOBO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.: 1. BREACH OF IMPLIED CONTRACT 2. TRESPASS TO CHATTEL

Case 0:11-cv CMA Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2015 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

1631 Zimmerman Trail 319 Maverick St. Billings, MT San Antonio, TX T: (406) T: (210) F: (406) F: (210)

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CENTRAL DIVISION. Special Title (Rule 1550(b)) PROCEEDING NO.

Case 0:16-cv WPD Document 101 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/24/2017 Page 1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

nm OPOREPJYINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 02/22/ :16 AM INDEX NO /2015

Plaintiffs, Docket No. L SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

IIAR CONN )14)R1) toliv

EXHIBIT 1

Case 0:13-cv JIC Document 318 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2016 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Transcription:

r CIV 13 CIV DS 067 ORDR 03802 Scanned Document Coversheet System Code CIV Case Number DS067 CaseType CIV THIS COVERSHEET IS FOR COURT Action Code ORDR PURPOSES ONLY AND THIS IS NOT Action Date 13 A PART OF THE OFFICIAL RECORD ActionTime 38 Action Seq 0002 Printed by PVEGA YOU WILL NOT BE CHARGED FOR TH I S PAG E Order GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT filed NEW FILE

T i R 1 CLARKSON LAW FIRM P C Ryan J Clarkson State Bar No 707 2 rclazkson@clarksonlawfirm com Shireen M Clarkson State Bar No 7882 3 sclarkson@clarksonlawfirm com h GR Al l OtVQR COLitTY r r E NAJ sai r iva hap p 7R G The Pershmg Square Building r srkt t u F autt 8 S Hill St Suite 701 Los Angeles CA 0013 5 Tel 3 788 050 6 7 Fax 3 788 070 Attorneysfor Plaint Armin Amiri 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR TI COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ARMIN AMIRI individually an on behalf of CASE NO CNDS 067 all others similarly situated 12 Assigned to Hon Bryan Foster S Plaintiff 13 ORDER GRANTING v PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 1 SETTLEMENT NIY PILLOW INC a Minnesota corporation 15 and DOES 1 through inclusive Defendants 1 77115 2 PROPOSED ORDER GRANTINGPRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT

1 WHEREAS Plaintiff in the above captioned action Armin Amiri Amiri or 2 Plaintiff and My Pillow Inc Defendant collectively the Parties have reached a 3 proposed settlement and compromise ofthe disputes between them in the above actions including the amendment collectively the Settlement Agreement 5 WHEREAS the Parties have applied to the Court for preliminary approval of the 6 proposed settlement of the Action the terms and conditions of which are set forth in the 7 Settlement Agreement 8 AND NOW the Court having read and considered the Settlement Agreement and accompanying documents and the Motion For Preliminary Settlement Approval and Supporting Papers and the Parties to the Settlement Agreement having consented to the entry ofthis order and all capitalized terms used herein having the meaning defined in the Settlement Agreement 12 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS 13 1 The Court for purposes of this Order adopts all defined terms as set forth in the 1 Settlement Agreement 15 2 Subject to further consideration by the Court at the time of the Final Approval Hearing the Court preliminarily approves the Settlement as fair reasonable and adequate to the Settlement Class as falling within the range ofpossible final approval and as meriting submission to the Settlement Class for its consideration 1 3 For purposes of the Settlement only the Court certifies the Settlement Class as described below All persons who purchased Covered Products in the United States its territories or at any United States military facility or exchange during the Class Period Excluded from the Settlement Class are all persons who validly opt out of the Settlement Class in a timely manner counsel of record and their respective law firms for the Parties Defendant and any of its parents affiliates subsidiaries independent service providers and all of their respective 77 152 PROPOSED 1 ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT

r 1 employees officers and directors the presidingjudge in 2 any of the Actions any natural person or entity that entered 3 into a release with Defendant prior to the Effective Date concerning any Covered Products 5 The Court preliminary finds solely for purposes of considering this Settlement 6 that the requirements of Cal Code Civ Proc 382 appear to be satisfied including 7 requirements for the existence of an ascertainable class a community interest and manageability 8 of the Settlement Class that common issues of law and fact predominate and that a settlement class is superior to alternative means of resolving the claims and disputes at issue in this action 5 The Court orders that Armin Amiri is appointed as the Representative Plaintiff The Court also orders that Ryan J Clarkson and Shireen M Clarkson at Clarkson Law Firm 12 P C are appointed Class Counsel The Court preliminarily finds that the Representative Plaintiff 13 and Class Counsel fairly and adequately represent and protect the interests of the absent 1 Settlement Class Members in accordancewith Cal Code Civ Proc 382 15 6 A Final Approval Hearing shall be held before this Court at 8 30 a m on January 30 in Department S of the San Bernardino SuperiorCourt to address a whether the proposed Settlement should be finally approved as fair reasonable and adequate and whether the Final Approval Order and Judgment should be entered and b whether Class Counsel s 1 application for attomeys fees costs expenses and service award should be approved Consideration of any application for an award of attorneys fees costs expenses and service award shall be separate from consideration of whether or not the proposed Settlement should be approved and from each other and shall be embodied in separate orders The Court will not decide the amount of any service award or Class Counsel s attorneys fees until the Final Approval Hearing 7 With the exception of such proceedings as are necessary to implement effectuate and grant final approval to the terms ofthe Settlement Agreement all proceedings are stayed in this Action and all Settlement Class Members are enjoined from commencing or continuing any action or proceeding in any court or tribunal asserting any claims encompassed by the Settlement 771152 PROPOSED 2 ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT

1 Agreement unless the Settlement Class Member timely files a valid Request for Exclusion as 2 defined in the Settlement Agreement 3 8 The Court approves as to form and content the notices and claim form substantially in the form attached to the Settlement Agreement 5 The Court finds that the Parties plan for providing notice to the Settlement Class 6 the Notice Plan described in the Settlement Agreement constitutes the best notice practicable 7 under the circumstances and constitutes due and sufficient notice to the Settlement Class the 8 terms of the Settlement Agreement and the Final Approval Hearing and complies fully with the requirements ofthe California Rules ofcourt the California Code ofcivil Procedure the California Civil Code the Constitution ofthe State ofcalifornia the United States Constitution and any other applicable law 12 The Court further finds that the Notice Plan adequately informs members of the 13 Settlement Class oftheir right to exclude themselves from the Settlement Class so as not to be 1 bound by the terms of the Settlement Agreement Any member of the Class who desires to be 15 excluded from the Settlement Class and therefore not bound by the terms of the Settlement Agreement must submit a timely and valid written Request for Exclusion pursuant to the instructions set forth in the Notice 1 l The Court appoints Digital Settlement Group LLC as the Claims Administrator 1 12 Any member of the Class who elects to be excluded shall not be entitled to receive any of the benefits of the Settlement Agreement shall not be bound by the release of any claims pursuant to the Settlement Agreement and shall not be entitled to object to the Settlement Agreement or appear at the Final Approval Hearing The names of all Persons timely submitting valid Requests for Exclusion shall be provided to the Court 13 Service ofall papers on counsel for the Parties shall be made as follows for Class Counsel to Ryan J Clarkson and Shireen M Clarkson at Clarkson Law Firm P C The Pershing Square Building 8 S Hill Street Suite 701 Los Angeles California 0013 Only Settlement Class Members who have submitted valid and timely written objections to the Settlement together with supporting papers shall be entitled to be heard at the Final Approval Hearing 7na15a 2 3 proposed ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT

r t z r s r 1 1 Any Settlement Class Member who does not make a valid written objection as 2 set forth in the Agreement on or before December 13 shall be deemed to have waived 3 such objection and forever shall be foreclosed from making any objection to the fairness or adequacy ofthe proposed settlement as incorporated in the Settlement Agreement the payment 5 ofattorneys fees and costs service award or the Final Approval Order and Judgment 6 15 Any Settlement Class Member who does not submit a valid Opt Out on or before December 13 shall not be excluded from the Settlement Class 8 Any settlement Class Member who is not excluded from the Settlement Class shall be deemed to have released the Settled Claims The Claims Administrator shall post the final Settlement Agreement on the Settlement Website The final Settlement Agreement shall include the approved class definition 12 set forth in Paragraph 3 above and the final notices and claim form 13 In the event that the proposed Settlement is not approved by the Court or in the 1 event that the Settlement Agreement becomes null and void pursuant to its terms this Order and 15 all orders entered in connection therewith shall become null and void shall be of no further force and effect and shall not be used or referred to for any purposes whatsoever in this civil action or in any other case or controversy in such event the Settlement Agreement and all negotiations and proceedings directly related thereto shall be deemed to be without prejudice to the rights of 1 any and all of the Parties who shall be restored to their respective positions as ofthe date and time immediately preceding the execution ofthe Settlement Agreement a r F s 1 u s Notice Period Begins October 6 y a E a ak Ob ection t out Deadline December 13 Claims Deadline December 13 Briefs in su rt offinal A roval January 5 Final Faimess Hearin Jan 30 1 The Court may for good cause extend any ofthe deadlines set forth in this Order without further notice to the Settlement Class Members The Final Approval Hearing may from 77 a15a2 proposed ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT

1 time to time and without further notice to the Settlement Class be continued by order of the 2 Court 3 The Final Approval Hearing may be adjourned or continued without further notice to the Class 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED 7 g Dated J H orab e ryan Foster 12 13 1 15 1 7na152 5 proposed ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT

1 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2 SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 3 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 5 I am employed in the County of LOS ANGELES State of CALIFORI IA I am over the age of and not a party to within action my business address is 8 S Hill St Ste 701 Los Angeles 6 California 0013 On October I served the foregoing documents described NOTICE OF ERRATA on interested parties in this action by sending a true copy of the document to the following parties as 8 follows 12 M tchell Silberbere Knupp Jeffrev L Richardson SBN 7 lr a msk com 377 W Olvmnic Blvd Los An eles CA 006 83 Telephone 3 312 376 13 1 X BY ELECTROTIIC MAIL I caused the document s to be successfully transmitted via electronic mail to the offices ofthe addressees 15 By ELECTRONIC SERVICE I caused the document s to be sent to the offices of the addressees via Online Filing Service 1 1 BY FACSIMILE I transmitted pursuant Rule 2 306 the above described document by facsimile machine which complied with Rule 03 3 to the attached listed fa c number s T he transmission originated from facsimile phone number 3 36 635 and was reported as complete and without error By OVER NiGHT DELNER I caused such envelope s thereon fully prepaid to be placed in the Norco Overnite box at Santa Monica California Zl BY PERSONAL SERVICE I caused such envelope s the addressees to be hand delivered to the offices of BY US MAIL I caused such envelope s with postage thereon fully prepaid to be placed in the United States mail at Los Angeles California pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedwe 15 0 I am readily familiar with this business practice for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service Executed on October at Los Angeles California X STATE I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct 1

a 1 FEDERAL I declare that I am employed in the office ofa member ofthe bar ofthis court at 2 whose direction the service was made 3 5 Sarah n al g 6 7 8 12 13 1 15 1 2