Case 1:00-cv JDT Document 26 Filed 06/21/2001 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED BY W D.C.

Similar documents
Case 2:03-cv BBD-sta Document 14 Filed 08/05/2004 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:99-cv JPM Document 14 Filed 11/24/1999 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Case 3:05-cv HTW-LRA Document 82 Filed 04/20/2007 Page 1 of 7

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Defendant.

U.S. District Court Western District of Tennessee (Memphis) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:98-cv jsg

EEOC v. Supervalu Holdings, Inc.

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Gehl Corporation d/b/a The Gehl Group

Case 1:11-cv NLH -AMD Document 61 Filed 01/24/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 211 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

EEOC v. Family Dollar Stores of Arkansas

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Monk's Inc., d/b/a International House of Pancakes, Defendant.

U.S. District Court Western District of Tennessee (Jackson) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:03-cv JDT-sta

EEOC v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

EEOC v. Cleveland Construction, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

U.S. District Court Western District of Tennessee (Memphis) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:05-cv BBD-tmp

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "Commission" or

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

US v Matagorda County Decree UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

EEOC and Maria Torres v. The Restaurant Company dba Perkins

~ Civil Action No. A-04-C~-o03370lI

EEOC v. Fleming, Inc., d/b/a J. Edward's

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. ) Defendant. )

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Tri-Spur Investment Company, Inc., dba Sbarro's Italian Eatery

EEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC

EEOC v. Brink's Incorporated

Case 4:04-cv LLP Document 1 Filed 12/28/2004 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA.

U.S. District Court (Live Database) U.S. District Court - Eastern District of Tennessee (Chattanooga) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:99-cv-00367

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLIll~ STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

)

Case 5:11-cv F Document 13 Filed 01/24/12 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:10-cv PLF Document 17 Filed 08/04/11 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

EEOC v. Altec Industries

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff and Jane Doe, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Brookshire Grocery Company, Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, CV-W-2-ECF

CASE NO. 5:00-CV COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION ON BEHALF OF JACKQULINE STOKES

EEOC v. Original Hot Dog Shops, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop, Food Gallery Original, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop

INSTRUCTION SHEET FOR APPEAL APPLICATION UNIFORM CONSTRUCTION CODE APPEALS BOARD

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. lj'lhed States FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS E,.'/';~rn DiStrict. HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Convergys Corporation

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Plaintiff, Defendant. CONSENT DECREE

If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

was entered in the office of the Clerk of District Court, County, City of, North Dakota, Docket Number. A copy of Dated this day of, 20.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc., d/b/a Harbor Freight Tools

~. OC' UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,C:;'IWELl.. cleiwestern DISTRICT OF LOmSIANA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO I. INTRODUCTION. 1. This action originated with a discrimination charge filed by Travis Woods

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Studley Products, Inc. and Wildwood Industries, Inc., Defendants.

READ THIS BEFORE COMPLETING THE FORMS!!! INSTRUCTIONS FOR MOTION FOR MODIFICATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION NO Defendant. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT INTRODUCTION

EEOC, Christopher, Bhend, and Chamara v. National Education Association, National Education Association - Alaska

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Seafoods Company

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels

Case 1:16-cv CCB Document 98 Filed 06/28/16 06/23/16 Page 1 of 14 11

United States of America v. City of Alma, Georgia and Bacon County, Georgia

NATURE OF THE ACTION. This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the

Case 2:01-cv DLG Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2002 Page 1 of 10

READ THIS BEFORE COMPLETING THE FORMS!!! INSTRUCTIONS FOR MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING

INSTRUCTION SHEET FOR APPEAL APPLICATION UNIFORM CONSTRUCTION CODE APPEALS BOARD

EEOC v. Pass and Seymour, Inc. and Kennmark Group, Ltd. (Consent Decree as to Pass and Seymour)

United States of America v. City of Pontiac, Michigan and Local #376 Fire Fighters Union, International Association of Fire Fighters

EEOC v. Tropiano Transportation Services, Inc.

EEOC v. Northwest Savings Bank

U.S. District Court Western District of North Carolina (Asheville) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:05-cv-00046

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Majesty Maintenance, Inc.

EEOC v. Supreme Corporation and Supreme Northwest LLC

EEOC and David Marcotte and Robert Kerouac v. Federal Express Corp.

United States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dutch Farms, Inc.

EEOC, et al v Lafayette College, et al.,

If you were a borrower on a mortgage loan account held or serviced by Wells Fargo, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

APPENDIX F. NEW JERSEY JUDICIARY APPELLATE PRACTICE FORMS 1. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION CIVIL CASE INFORMATION STATEMENT

Case 8:04-cv SCB-TBM Document 32 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 1 of 6

5:06cv1684 JUDGE HICKS MAG. JUDGE HORNSBY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT ~~"A"!tOl'T~'CTCOURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEX~eRQUE, New MI!XICO ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 1:10-cv JEB Document 13 Filed 08/03/11 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

HOW TO CHANGE A YOUR NAME

Case 4:17-cv JLK Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2018 Page 1 of 5

A SUMMARY OF YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES. You May: Summary: Due Date:

EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC

Case 2:17-cv JLL-JAD Document 1 Filed 08/16/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 : : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. CONSENT DECREE INTRODUCTION

ORIGINAL COMPLAINT OF THE UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT:

Parker v. Royal Oaks Entr Inc

Case 2:17-cv GMS Document 8 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 3

SHAWNEE BASS JUSTICE OF THE PEACE ERATH COUNTY, PRECINCT 1 EVICTIONS

EEOC v. John Wieland Homes and Neighborhoods, Inc.

Case 1:18-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Japanese Food Solutions Inc., d/b/a Minado Restaurant

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bob Watson Chevrolet

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Equal Employment Opportunity ) Commission, ) Case No.: CV PHX-DAE

U.S. District Court Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:99-cv-01184

Auto accident Motion for Summary Judgment complete package

Transcription:

Case 1:00-cv-01041-JDT Document 26 Filed 06/21/2001 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED BY W D.C. FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE 0 1 JUN 21 PH It: 05 EASTERN DIVISION ROBe, I :, Di TROLIO CLERK. US. DIST CT. W. D. OF in JACKSON EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. 1 :OOcv1041 MAGNETEK, INC., (Judge Todd Defendant. CONSENT DECREE This lawsuit was filed February 3, 2000 by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC against MagneTek, Inc. (MagneTek under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e, et seq. (Title VII. The Complaint in the lawsuit claims that since at least April 21, 1993 MagneTek unlawfully failed to hire female applicants for operative positions at its Lexington, Tennessee facility because of their sex. EEOC and MagneTek have agreed to this consent decree to settle all of the claims involved in this lawsuit. The Court has reviewed the terms of this decree in light of the applicable laws and regulations, and hereby approves this decree. THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED: This document entered on the docket sheet in compliance w~h Rule 58 end/or.79 (e FRCP on (p,;l"'oi

Case 1:00-cv-01041-JDT Document 26 Filed 06/21/2001 Page 2 of 6 I. JURISDICTION The United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, Eastern Division, has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this lawsuit, and will retain jurisdiction over this decree for purposes of enforcement and dispute resolution. II. DISCLAIMER Neither the negotiation of or agreement to this decree is an admission or acknowledgment by MagneTek that any of its employees, officers, directors, or agents have violated Title VII. III. INDIVIDUAL REMEDIES MagneTek will pay a total of $200,000 to the identified alleged victims of discrimination in accordance with instructions from EEOC concerning who will be paid and how much each person will be paid. MagneTek will not be required to make the instructed payment to the identified alleged victim of discrimination unless it receives the Release of Claims attached to this decree signed by the identified alleged victim of discrimination and notarized. Each payment will be made within thirty days after MagneTek receives the signed and notarized Release of Claims from the identified alleged victim of discrimination. A copy of each check (front and back, and of the payment transmittal, will be mailed at the same time to Carson Owen at: Carson L. Owen, Senior Trial Attorney Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 1407 Union Ave., Suite 621 Memphis, TN 38104. 2

Case 1:00-cv-01041-JDT Document 26 Filed 06/21/2001 Page 3 of 6 IV. RELEASE OF EEOC'S CLAIM In consideration of MagneTek's obligations in paragraph III above, all claims of gender discrimination (which include but are not limited to lawsuits, charges filed with EEOC and charges filed with the Tennessee Human Rights Commission concerning applicants for employment at MagneTek's Lexington, Tennessee facility from April 21, 1993 to February 3,2000, which have been or could have been made by EEOC shall be deemed to be fully settled and finally resolved. Thus all claims of EEOC alleging gender discrimination concerning applicants for employment at MagneTek's Lexington, Tennessee facility from April 21, 1993 to February 3, 2000 are released and waived. V. ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS EEOC and MagneTek will each bear its own attorneys' fees and costs incurred in this action. (Concluded on next page. 3

Case 1:00-cv-01041-JDT Document 26 Filed 06/21/2001 Page 4 of 6 ~ SO ORDERED this 21 day Of_-r-"'7l"<...::...!._--' 2001. Consented to on behalf of the respective parties:. TODD STATES DISTRICT JUDGE FOR PLAINTIFF EEOC: FOR DEFENDANT' C. GREGORY STEWART General Counsel GWENDOLYN YOUNG REAMS Associate General Counsel,.Jtfp.QA~'\9-_ C I. tav0-- KATHARINE W. KORES Regional Attorney ~ /Jed TERR~CK Supervisory Trial Attorney CARSON L. OWEN Senior Trial Attorney Risk Manager / MAGNETEK, INC. S EPHEN L. SHIE DS JAMES L. HOLT, JR. VALERIE BARNES SPEAKMAN JACKSON, SHIELDS, YEISER & CANTREll P.O. Box 382730 Memphis, TN 38183-2730 Telephone No. (901 754-8001 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT DRAGA.ANTHONY I Trial Attorney EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 1407 Union Avenue, Suite 621 Memphis, Tennessee 38104 Telephone No. (901 544-0133 4

Case 1:00-cv-01041-JDT Document 26 Filed 06/21/2001 Page 5 of 6 RELEASE OF CLAIMS BY (insert name I, (insert name, (insert address, understand that the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC has filed a lawsuit against MagneTek, Inc. (MagneTek under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e, et seq. (Title VII. I understand that EEOC claims in the lawsuit that since at least April 21,1993 MagneTek has failed to hire female applicants for operative positions because of their sex at its Lexington, Tennessee facility in violation of Title VII. I understand that MagneTek denies that any violation of Title VII has occurred. I understand that a settlement has been agreed to by EEOC and MagneTek, and that as part of that settlement I will be paid $(insert amount by MagneTek. In consideration for receiving this amount of money from MagneTek, I hereby release MagneTek from any claims that MagneTek denied me employment at its Lexington, Tennessee facility because of my sex. I understand that the $(insert amount is being paid to me and accepted by me in settlement of all such claims. I have read this release, I understand it, and I am voluntarily signing it in exchange for the $(insert amount I will be paid by MagneTek. I have been given twenty-one days to consult with an attorney of my own choosing before signing this release. Signed and sworn to before me (insert name this _ day of, 2001. Notary Public My commission expires

Case 1:00-cv-01041-JDT Document 26 Filed 06/21/2001 Page 6 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT - WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE Notice of Distribution This notice confirms a copy ofthe document docketed as number 26 in case 1:00-CV-01041 was distributed by fax, mail, or direct printing on June 26, 2001 to the parties listed. Carson L. Owen EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 1407 Union Avenue Ste.621 Memphis, TN 38104 Draga G. Anthony EEOC 1407 Union Ave. Ste.621 Memphis, TN 38104 Valerie B. Speakman JACKSON SHIELDS YEISER & CANTRELL 262 German Oak Drive Cordova, TN 38018 James L. Holt JACKSON SHIELDS YEISER & CANTRELL 262 German Oak Drive Cordova, TN 38018 Honorable James Todd US DISTRICT COURT