Case 2:18-cv R-AGR Document 7 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:26

Similar documents
CIV CIV DS ORDR Order GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION } } } } } } } } } } } } } } /

Case 3:17-cv VC Document Filed 09/06/18 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:14-cv WBS-EFB Document 14 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 5

)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OMARI BOBO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES NORTH CENTRAL DISTRICT (GLENDALE) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Fresno County Superior Court, Case No. 1OCECGO2 116 The Honorable Jeffrey Y. Hamilton, Judge

Part Description 1 5 pages 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Motion for Summary Judgment

in furtherance of and in response to its Tentative Decision dated 1/4/2010 addressing various matters

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:12-cv PSG-RZ Document 1 Filed 10/10/12 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

2:11-cv R -JCG Document 58 Filed 01/06/12 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:699

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

Case 2:00-cv GAF-RC Document 435 Filed 05/14/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:1893

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiffs and Appellants, Defendants and Res ondents.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff{s),

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

a. Name of person served:

This matter came on regularly before this Court for hearings on October 7,2004 and on April

LODGED. MHY p CLERK, QS DISTRICT COL VIRAL DISTRICT OF CA i, F,, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI A

AS MODIFIED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, STERLING SAVINGS BANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

West Lincoln Avenue Tel: (714) of the Long Beach Pediatric Surgery

IIAR CONN )14)R1) toliv

Case 2:09-cv DOC-RZ Document 72 Filed 08/31/10 Page 1 of 37 Page ID #:992

copy 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VTJLCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Case3:11-cv WHA Document33 Filed01/06/12 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Plaintiffs,

Case 2:14-cv GW-AS Document 6 Filed 07/07/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:389

Federal Pro Se Clinic CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5

DEC 1 i1z ) FOR DEFENDANTS DEMURRER TO ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ) ) Time: 439-pm.3) C.D. Michel -

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Gk) AUo Superior Court of California CountY of Los Angeles. Sherri R. Carter, xecutive ofricer/clerk Deputv

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY ROCKARD J. DELGADILLO CITY ATTORNEY REPORT RE: COURT RULING

MOTION TO STRIKE OPENING BRIEF; PROPOSED ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Jonathan Arvizu v. City of Pasadena Request for Publication Second District Case No.: B Superior Court Case No.: BC550929

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CLAIM FOR MONEY OR DAMAGES r\eceiyeu WARNING liodesto CITY CLERK Be sure your claim is filed with the' -.. ment Code Section 910 et seq)

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF KERN, NORTH KERN DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.: 1. BREACH OF IMPLIED CONTRACT 2. TRESPASS TO CHATTEL

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER ANSWERING A BREACH OF CONTRACT COMPLAINT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

HAROLD P. STURGEON, Plaintiff and Petitioner, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants and Respondents, and

FAX. IN TUE SUPERIOR COURT OF TUE STATE OF caiafornia INANDFORTHLCQLNTYOELOSANELES. EAST l)i$trict

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:08-cv VRW Document 9 Filed 07/23/2008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SAMPLE FORM F NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL

DISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

Case 2:17-ap BB Doc 50 Filed 05/04/17 Entered 05/04/17 14:14:01 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ELECTRONICALLY RECEIVED Superior Court of California, County of Orange. 02/ at 11:58:07 AM

Complaint Filed: September 2, 2016 Trial Date: None Set. Case 2:16-cv SB Document 9 Filed 12/30/16 Page 1 of 7

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

"Uge EB JAN Daie Prodessod - By: %I, Y-.sT. wij ~1 ~

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER

vs. ) NOTICE OF RULING 14 )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

F ADV.NOTICE.LODGMENT

Case 6:11-ap SC Doc 14 Filed 12/08/11 Entered 12/08/11 15:28:33 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5

Benjamin v. Google Inc. Doc. 45

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

1 The parties to this action, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to. 2 the following:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:14-cv SJO-FFM Document 27 Filed 10/14/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:773

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Petitioner. Respondent. Real Party in Interest.

the unverified First Amended Complaint (the Complaint ) of plaintiffs MIKE SPITZER and

Case 5:12-cv EJD Document 1134 Filed 01/27/16 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:17-ap BB Doc 24 Filed 03/21/17 Entered 03/21/17 10:59:09 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6

Case btb Doc 249 Entered 05/19/17 16:27:09 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA. Chapter 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Request for Publication

Case 3:08-cv BEN-BLM Document 3 Filed 06/17/2008 Page 1 of 2

Exempt from filing fee Gov't Code Secs. 6100, 6103 NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY OF COUNSEL

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. CINDY LEE GARCIA, an individual, Case No. CV MWF (VBKx) Plaintiff,

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT GRANTING PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE

Case 2:07-cv TJH-CT Document 56 Filed 11/29/2007 Page 1 of 6

Case 6:11-bk WJ Doc 262 Filed 01/20/12 Entered 01/20/12 16:18:57 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5

Case 1:12-cv LJO-SKO Document 10 Filed 04/16/13 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. CINDY LEE GARCIA, an individual, Case No. CV MWF (VBKx) Plaintiff,

1 Justice, on January 9, A copy of the Proof of Service of Summons is attached hereto. 4 Dated: January 27, 2015 MICHEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT APPELLANT S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OPENING BRIEF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PARKER, et al., THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF PURSUANT TO RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

TO BE FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

No [DC# CV MJJ] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. RUSSELL ALLEN NORDYKE; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants,

Transcription:

Case :-cv-00-r-agr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Ryan J. Clarkson (SBN 0 rclarkson@clarksonlawfirm.com Shireen M. Clarkson (SBN sclarkson@clarksonlawfirm.com Bahar Sodaify (SBN 0 bsodaify@clarksonlawfirm.com Sunset Blvd., Ste. 0 Los Angeles, CA 00 Tel: ( -00 Fax: ( -00 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Erikka Skinner and Ann Kenney IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Sunset Blvd., Suite 0 0 ERIKKA SKINNER, ANN KENNEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiff, KEN S FOODS, INC., and DOES through 0, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. :-cv-00 PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (a(

Case :-cv-00-r-agr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (a(, Plaintiffs Erikka Skinner and Ann Kenney, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated ( Plaintiffs, by and through their counsel, Shireen M. Clarkson, Ryan J. Clarkson, and Bahar Sodaify of, hereby voluntarily dismiss in their entirety all claims in this action against Defendant Ken s Foods, Inc. ( Defendant. Plaintiffs have the right to voluntarily dismiss this action because Defendant has not served either an answer or motion for summary judgment in this case. Fed. R. Civ. P. (a((a(i. Accordingly, this matter may be dismissed without prejudice and without court order. Sunset Blvd., Suite 0 DATED: February, 0 /s/ Shireen M. Clarkson Ryan J. Clarkson, Esq. Shireen M. Clarkson, Esq. Bahar Sodaify, Esq. Attorneys for the Plaintiff Erikka Skinner and Ann Kenney 0

Case :-cv-00-r-agr Document - Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Ryan J. Clarkson (SBN 0 rclarkson@clarksonlawfirm.com Shireen M. Clarkson (SBN sclarkson@clarksonlawfirm.com Bahar Sodaify (SBN 0 bsodaify@clarksonlawfirm.com Sunset Blvd., Ste. 0 Los Angeles, CA 00 Tel: ( -00 Fax: ( -00 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Erikka Skinner and Ann Kenney IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Sunset Blvd., Suite 0 0 ERIKKA SKINNER, ANN KENNEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiff, KEN S FOODS, INC., and DOES through 0, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. :-cv-00 PROOF OF SERVICE

Case :-cv-00-r-agr Document - Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: Sunset Blvd., Suite 0 0 0 PROOF OF SERVICE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA I am employed in the County of LOS ANGELES, State of CALIFORNIA. I am over the age of and not a party to within action; my business address is Sunset Blvd., Suite 0, Los Angeles, CA 00. On February, 0, I served the foregoing document described as WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (a( on interested parties in this action by sending a true copy of the document to the following parties as follows: Corporation Service Company c/o Ken s Foods, Inc. Lawyers Incorporating Service 0 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 0N Sacramento, CA (BY ELECTRONIC MAIL I caused the document(s to be successfully transmitted via electronic mail to the offices of the addressees. (BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE I caused the document(s to be sent to the offices of the addressees via CM/ECF Service. (BY FACSIMILE I transmitted pursuant Rule.0, the above-described document by facsimile machine (which complied with Rule 00(, to the attached listed fax number(s. The transmission originated from facsimile phone number ( -00 and was reported as complete and without error. (BY PERSONAL SERVICE I caused such envelope(s to be hand delivered to the offices of the addressees. X (BY US MAIL I caused such envelope(s with postage thereon fully prepaid, to be placed in the United States mail at Los Angeles, California, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure.0. I am readily familiar with this business practice for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service.

Case :-cv-00-r-agr Document - Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #:0 Executed on February, 0, at Los Angeles, California. (STATE I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. X (FEDERAL I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made. Sarah Longalong 0 Sunset Blvd., Suite 0 0