Lahore University of Management Sciences. Phil 228/Pol 207 Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy Summer 2017

Similar documents
Lahore University of Management Sciences. Phil 323/Pol 305 Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy Fall

PH 3022 SOCIAL AND POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY UK LEVEL 5 UK CREDITS: 15 US CREDITS: 3/0/3

PHIL 28 Ethics & Society II

Lahore University of Management Sciences. Law 310 Jurisprudence Fall Semester 2014

Theories of Social Justice

Lahore University of Management Sciences. Law 102 Introduction to Pakistan Legal System Fall 2017

Lahore University of Management Sciences. Introduction to Legal Reasoning LAW 101 Section 1. Spring 2018

Ethics and Public Policy

Theory of Politics (114) Comprehensive Reading List

EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS SPRING

Lahore University of Management Sciences. Legal Writing & Research Methods Law 200. Spring 2018 COURSE BASICS

PHIL 240 Introduction to Political Philosophy

Lahore University of Management Sciences. LAW 481B Legal Practice II. Spring 2018

Social and Political Ethics, 7.5 ECTS Autumn 2016

Lahore University of Management Sciences. ECON 4410 Issues in Economic Policy

PHIL446: Political philosophy and non-human animals Fall 2017

PHIL 240 Introduction in Political Philosophy

POL 10a: Introduction to Political Theory Spring 2017 Room: Golding 101 T, Th 2:00 3:20 PM

Legal Practice LAW 481-B Spring 2014

STEVEN WALL. Associate Professor. Department of Philosophy, University of Connecticut (2008 to 2010)

4AANB006 Political Philosophy I Syllabus Academic year

Democratic Theory 1 Trevor Latimer Office Hours: TBA Contact Info: Goals & Objectives. Office Hours. Midterm Course Evaluation

Lahore University of Management Sciences LAW 470: Evidence Law. Fall 2017

Theories of Justice. Is economic inequality unjust? Ever? Always? Why?

Lahore University of Management Sciences Law-210 Concept of Law

Global Justice. Course Overview

POSC 6100 Political Philosophy

Politics 4463g/9762b: Theories of Global Justice (Winter Term)

Philosophy 3013E THOMISTIC PHILOSOPHY II. Thursday (1:30 4:30 PM) St. Peter s Seminary, Room 108

Social and Political Philosophy Philosophy 4470/6430, Government 4655/6656 (Thursdays, 2:30-4:25, Goldwin Smith 348) Topic for Spring 2011: Equality

City University of Hong Kong

LAHORE UNIVERSITY OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES (LUMS) SHAIKH AHMAD HASSAN SCHOOL OF LAW. LAW 310 Jurisprudence. Fall 2017

Almeida, Michael and Mark Bernstein. (2003) Lucky Libertarianism, Philosophical Studies, 113:

Libertarianism, GOVT60.14

Libertarianism and the Justice of a Basic Income. Peter Vallentyne, University of Missouri at Columbia

Difference and Inclusive Democracy: Iris Marion Young s Critique of the Rawlsian Theory of Justice

Introduction to Equality and Justice: The Demands of Equality, Peter Vallentyne, ed., Routledge, The Demands of Equality: An Introduction

PHILO 246 Political Philosophy

Political Science 103 Spring, 2018 Dr. Edward S. Cohen INTRODUCTION TO POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY

A Defence of Equality among Societal Cultures.

Lahore University of Management Sciences. MGMT 263 Contemporary Social Policy Issues in Pakistan Spring Semester 2017

PS 209, Spring 2016: Introduction to Political Theory. Tuesday/Thursday 11:00-12:15, 19 Ingraham Hall

FACULTY OF HUMANITIES, SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES POLITICS COURSE UNIT OUTLINE 2016/17. POLI IDEALS OF SOCIAL JUSTICE Semester: 1 Credits: 20

Political Science 103 Fall, 2015 Dr. Edward S. Cohen INTRODUCTION TO POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY

NEW YORK CITY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY The City University of New York School of Arts & Sciences Department of Social Science Course Outline

Phil 27 Ethics and Society

Global Justice. Course Overview

POS 103, Introduction to Political Theory Peter Breiner

Introduction to Political Thought

PHIL 3226: Social and Political Philosophy, Fall 2009 TR 11:00-12:15, Denny 216 Dr. Gordon Hull

Lahore University of Management Sciences. ECON 449 Philosophy and Economics

Foundations of Global Justice

Incentives and the Natural Duties of Justice

INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES INVOLVING ETHICS AND JUSTICE Vol.I - Economic Justice - Hon-Lam Li

New Directions for the Capability Approach: Deliberative Democracy and Republicanism

Princeton University Press

JUSTICE IN DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY

KING S COLLEGE LONDON DEPARTMENT OF THEOLOGY AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES

Capabilities vs. Opportunities for Well-being. Peter Vallentyne, University of Missouri-Columbia

Do we have a strong case for open borders?

Philosophy 520/Political Science 587 Liberalism and its Critics

Bernd Lahno Can the Social Contract Be Signed by an Invisible Hand? A New Debate on an Old Question *

E-LOGOS. Rawls two principles of justice: their adoption by rational self-interested individuals. University of Economics Prague

Instructor: Margaret Kohn. Fall, Thursday, Office Hours: Thursday 1:00-2:00 (SS3118)

Pos 419Z Seminar in Political Theory: Equality Left and Right Spring Peter Breiner

Lahore University of Management Sciences. Fall POL 341 Political Economy of Pakistan

The Original Position

PSC 5323 Political Inquiry Approaches and Methods

Ethics and Public Policy. Government / Public Policy 42 Spring 2016 Dartmouth College

Great Philosophers: John Rawls ( ) Brian Carey 13/11/18

Two Pictures of the Global-justice Debate: A Reply to Tan*

On Original Appropriation. Peter Vallentyne, University of Missouri-Columbia

Advanced Political Philosophy I: Political Authority and Obligation

Kenneth Einar Himma Winter 2014 (Tuesday & Thursday, Room 441, 1:30 p.m. 3:20 p.m. Friday, April 12, April 26, 1:30 p.m. 10:20 p.m.

When Does Equality Matter? T. M. Scanlon. Lecture 1: Introduction. Our country, and the world, are marked by extraordinarily high levels of

Though several factors contributed to the eventual conclusion of the

Utilitarian Ethics and Counselor Decision-Making

COURSE TITLE Course number Content area Course type Course level Year Semester. 1.7.

Global Justice. Course Overview

Freedom and the Limits of State Intervention. Suzie Kim Fall

Is Rawls s Difference Principle Preferable to Luck Egalitarianism?

SOC 100 Introduction to Sociology Spring 2018

Social Philosophy (PHI 316/CHV 318/HUM 316/SOC 318) Jonny Thakkar, Fall

POLS 260: INTRODUCTION TO COMPARATIVE POLITICS Department of Political Science Northern Illinois University Tuesday & Thursday 11-12:15 pm DU 461

Definition: Property rights in oneself comparable to property rights in inanimate things

PHL 370 Issues in Philosophy of Law: Rights Instructor: Mark Schranz Lectures: TBD Office/Hours: TBD

Global Capitalism & Law: An Interdisciplinary Seminar SYLLABUS Reading Materials Books

Global Justice and Two Kinds of Liberalism

POL 230 Theories of International Relations Spring 2010

Poli MWF: 2:30-3: Hodges Hall Instructor: Mr. Alex D. Cole Office Hours - MWF 12:30-2:15 - Stubbs 324

LAWS20102 Jurisprudence ( )

EC311 Ethics & Economics

MODERN POLITICAL THOUGHT

Political Philosophy Syllabus

Lahore University of Management Sciences. POL 320 Comparative Politics Fall

INTERGENERATIONAL JUSTICE AND COERCION AS A GROUND OF JUSTICE

Assessment: Course Four Column Fall 2017

ROBERT S. TAYLOR June 2018

LAWS20102 Jurisprudence ( )

The University of Toledo

Transcription:

Phil 228/Pol 207 Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy Summer 2017 Instructor Room No. Office Hours Email Telephone Secretary/TA TA Office Hours Course URL (if any) Anwar ul Haq TBA TBA anwarul.haq@lums.edu.pk Course Basics Credit Hours 4 Lecture(s) Nbr of Lec(s) Per Recitation/Lab (per week) Nbr of Lec(s) Per Tutorial (per week) Nbr of Lec(s) Per 4 Duration 110 minutes NA Duration NA Duration Course Distribution Core Elective * Open for Student Category All Close for Student Category None COURSE DESCRIPTION This course engages with key contemporary issues in analytic western political philosophy. The focus will be on justice; however, we shall additionally touch upon debates surrounding rights, equality, and liberty. We will investigate justice to understand what is at issue; we will subject it to careful philosophical analyses, and examine its relevance to crucial contemporary issues. We will attempt to reach our own defensible conclusions through discussion and debate. The following questions will be central to our discussion: What is justice? Is it fairness? Is it equal treatment? Is it getting one s due? Or perhaps conception of justice varies across societies? Also, what requirements a society need fulfill to be called just? For instance, is it acceptable that a select few, virtually living next to extremely deprived, have more money than they could possibly spend? Or should the rich be heavily taxed to help the impoverished (and on what grounds)? Should earned income be taxed the same as unearned income? Moreover, is it just that people endowed with superior natural abilities enjoy ensuing rewards? Perhaps such rewards are undeserved and partly owed to those disadvantaged in the natural lottery? Our public policy depends on answers to these questions and every individual inhabiting a society has a stake in it.

COURSE PREREQUISITE(S) None COURSE OBJECTIVES Acquire a detailed knowledge of some of the concepts, positions and arguments in the central literature in contemporary political philosophy. Acquire a sense of how the positions on different topics relate to each other. Engage closely and critically with some of the ideas studied. Develop an ability to think independently about some of the ideas studied. Construct arguments, responding to but not merely reproducing the arguments of others. Learning Outcomes Ability to understand and analyze philosophical arguments. Ability to write sophisticated philosophical essays. Ability to develop defensible arguments for or against a philosophical issue. Grading Breakup and Policy Tests/assignments: 30 Midterm: 35 Final essay: 35% Examination Detail Midterm Exam Yes Final Exam No

COURSE OVERVIEW Topics INTRODUCTION Recommended Readings Session 1-2 - Introduction to contemporary political philosophy - The relationship between justice, rights, equality, and liberty Perry, J., Bratman, M., & Fischer, J. (2007). Ethics and Society. Introduction to philosophy (4th ed., pp. 481-488). New York: Oxford University Press. I. JUSTICE: AN INTRODUCTION Session 3-4 - The nature of justice - Situating justice in the historical context - Introduction to contemporary debates surrounding justice Ryan, A. (1991). Introduction. In Ryan, A. (Ed.), Justice. New York: Oxford University Press. Vallentyne, P. (2007). Distributive Justice. In Goodin, R., Pettit, P., Pogge, T., &. Distributive Justice. A companion to contemporary political philosophy (2nd ed., pp. 548-562). Malden, MA: Blackwell II. JOHN RAWLS THEORY OF JUSTICE Session 5-6 Justice as Fairness Rawls, J. (1971). Justice as Fairness. In A theory of justice. (pp. 3-46). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Session 7-8 The Principles of Justice (Equal liberty for all; fair equality of opportunity, and compensating the worstoff) Rawls, J. (1971). The Principles of Justice. In A theory of justice. (pp. 47-101). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Session 9-10 - The Original Position (Arguing for the principles of justice) - Political Equality Rawls, J. (1971). The Original Position. In A theory of justice. (pp. 102-170). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Rawls, J. (1999). A Kantian Conception of Equality. In Freeman, S. (Ed.), John Rawls: Collected Papers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Session 11-12 Global Justice Rawls, J. (1999). The law of peoples. (pp. 11-43). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

III. RAWLS AND HIS CRITICS Session 13-14 The original position: is its characterization convincing? Nagel, T. (1989). Rawls on Justice. In Daniels, N. (Ed.), Reading Rawls. California: Stanford University Press. Hare, R. (1989). Rawls Theory of Justice. Daniels, N. (Ed.), California: Stanford University Press. Session 15-16 Rawls methodology: is it compelling? Scanlon, T. (1989). Rawls Theory of Justice. In Daniels, N. (Ed.), Reading Rawls. California: Stanford University Press. Session 17-18 Rawls principles of justice: are they defensible? Hart, H. (1989). Rawls on Liberty and its Priority. In Daniels, N. (Ed.), Reading Rawls. California: Stanford University Press. Daniels, N. (1989). Equal Liberty and Unequal Worth of Liberty. In Daniels, N. (Ed.), Reading Rawls. California: Stanford University Press. Session 19-20 Rawls views on global justice: are they plausible? Are there cogent alternatives? O'Neill, O. (2000). Bounds of justice. (pp. 115-167). Cambridge: Cambridge university press. IV. COMPETING THEORIES OF JUSTICE (Perhaps Rawls got things wrong) Session 21-22 Libertariansim Nozick R. (2006). Distributive Justice. In Goodin, R., Pettit, P. (Ed.), Contemporary Political philosophy: an anthology. Malden: Blackwell Publishing. Session 23-25 Capabilities Approach Justice: Awarding capabilities, attaining welfare Sen, A. (2006). Equality of What? In Goodin, R., Pettit, P. (Ed.), Contemporary political philosophy: an anthology. Malden: Blackwell Publishing. Nussbaum M., (2011). Creating capabilities. (pp. 1-67, 113-122 ). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Session 26-28 Communitariansim MacIntyre, A. (2007). After Virtue. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press. (selections) Sandel, M. (2006). The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self. In Goodin, R., Pettit, P. (Ed.), Contemporary political philosophy: an anthology. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

Textbook(s)/Supplementary Readings Goodin, R., & Pettit, P., (Eds.). (2005). Contemporary political philosophy: an anthology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Kymlicka, W., (2002). Contemporary political philosophy: an introduction. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Daniels, N. (Ed.). (1989). Reading Rawls. California: Stanford University Press. N.B. The list of readings may change depending on how the course proceeds.