MARYLAND CONTRACTS DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR BRENDAN HURSON UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND CAREY SCHOOL OF LAW

Similar documents
GEORGIA CONTRACTS DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR WILLIAM BIRDTHISTLE CHICAGO-KENT SCHOOL OF LAW

CALIFORNIA REMEDIES ESSAY WORKSHOP PROFESSOR CHRISTOPHER IDE-DON UC DAVIS SCHOOL OF LAW

MICHIGAN CONTRACTS & SALES DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR ANNE LAWTON MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW

CALIFORNIA CONTRACTS ESSAY WORKSHOP PROFESSOR CHRISTOPHER IDE-DON UC DAVIS SCHOOL OF LAW

SURETYSHIP PROFESSOR KARA BRUCE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO COLLEGE OF LAW

TEXAS AGENCY PROFESSOR WILLIAM BIRDTHISTLE CHICAGO KENT COLLEGE OF LAW

45-47 Part 1: General & Specified Prohibited Conduct Lecture 11: Consumer Protection Law

PENNSYLVANIA CONFLICT OF LAWS PROFESSOR KEVIN P. OATES DREXEL UNIVERSITY THOMAS R. KLINE SCHOOL OF LAW

CONTRACT LAW IN GENERAL: R

AGENCY PROFESSOR WILLIAM BIRDTHISTLE CHICAGO KENT COLLEGE OF LAW

OUTLINE FOR KIEFF S CONTRACTS CLASS - Auction Public contracting: Sealed bidding must be utilized if (1) time permits. (2) the award will be made on

Guardianship & Conservatorship In Virginia

FLORIDA S DEPENDENCY BENCHBOOK BENCHCARD: PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION HEARING

NUTS AND BOLTS OF PERFORMING NOTARIAL ACTS. Kathleen Butler, Executive Director American Society of Notaries Austin, TX August 30, 2017

LAW 1503: Contract Law Exam Notes 2017

COURT FACILITY EQUAL ACCESS POLICY

Activities: Teacher lecture (background information and lecture outline provided); class participation activity.

Attending the Coroner s Court as a witness and how to give evidence

WITH RECENT CHANGES ISSUED BY THE CFPB, FINAL REMITTANCE TRANSFER REGULATIONS TO BECOME EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 7, 2013

MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL PROCEDURE DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR ISAAC BORENSTEIN SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL

t <u o: CU 8fe a- (U .Si, CD O Q) Squeaky Clean 1 Lawn Enforcement ICollege Concierge 1 Lettuce-Do-Lunch 1 Jazz My Wheels 'f5 E 3 'u <D u (/) UIO3-

PENNSYLVANIA TORTS DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR MICHAEL P. MORELAND VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW

s 11(1)(a) s (11)(1)(b) s 11(1)(c)

ILLINOIS CONFLICT OF LAWS PROFESSOR DAVID L. FRANKLIN DEPAUL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW

Social Media and the First Amendment

LLB#170#!Law$of$Contract$B"

Order on Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ING USA ANNUITY AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY)

CONTEMPT. This packet contains forms and information on: How to File a Petition for Citation of Contempt

MARYLAND TORTS DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR MICHAEL PAPPAS UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF LAW

FD/FOC4037 USE THIS MISCELLANEOUS MOTION PACKET FOR

LAW SCHOOL ESSENTIALS FEDERAL CIVIL PROCEDURE PROFESSOR JOHN C. JEFFRIES, JR. UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW

Electronic Filing MEMORANDUM. Pat Neill. DATE: June 8, Research Regarding Sustainable Future Section Courthouse Project.

Illegality and contracts State of the law in Singapore

Article I: Legislative Branch; Powers of Congress, Powers denied Congress, how Congress functions

Bob Simpson: Director of Intergovernmental Relations, Inuvialuit Regional Corp.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR VACATING MISDEMEANOR AND GROSS MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS

SUMMARY OF NORTH CAROLINA EXPUNCTIONS. Criteria Filing Requirements Add l Information

DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY I $5,461 - $7,410/Month

DATA REQUEST GUIDELINES

Eyewitness Identification. Professor Nancy K. Steblay Augsburg College Minneapolis

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A COMPLAINT FOR DIVORCE WITHOUT MINOR CHILDREN

Measuring Public Opinion

MASSACHUSETTS WILLS PROFESSOR KENT SCHENKEL NEW ENGLAND SCHOOL OF LAW

If at all possible, it is strongly recommended that you get advice from a lawyer to help you with this application.

CAMPAIGN REGISTRATION STATEMENT STATE OF WISCONSIN ETHCF-1

Multi-Agency Guidance (Non Police)

CONTRACTS AND SALES PROFESSOR GEORGE S. GEIS UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW

Common Evidentiary Predicates to Authenticate Evidence

Recording Secretary Participant Workbook Facilitators: Colin Treanor (UConn 2014) Jake Lueck (Kansas 2017)

Order on Motions for Partial Summary Judgment (RICHARD W. MCWHORTER)

Deferred Action for Parental Accountability (DAPA) Frequently Asked Questions December 4, 2014

CAUSE NO CITY OF FORT WORTH'S ORIGINAL ANSWER. COMES NOW Defendant City of Fort Worth, Texas ("the City") and files this its

GENERAL ORDER PORT WASHINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CARROLL COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA COMPLAINT FOR DIVORCE. Plaintiff, [Name], comes before this Court and shows this

Trial by Jury. Very different from the criminal law right to trial by jury!!

2. UNCONSCIENTIOUS DEALING

Incorporating Unemployment Compensation Law Into Your Practice

Opinions on Choice of Law, Forum Selection, Arbitration, and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments or Arbitral Awards in Cross-Border Transactions

Most Frequently Asked Questions

Country Profile: Brazil

MARYLAND PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PROFESSOR RUSSELL MCCLAIN UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF LAW

CIVIL PROCEDURE PROFESSOR JONATHAN NASH EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW

FEDERAL JURISDICTION & PROCEDURE PROFESSOR JOHN C. JEFFRIES, JR. UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW

Week 1 Lecture. Nature of Tort Law

IEEE Tellers Committee Operations Manual

LAW SCHOOL ESSENTIALS CONTRACTS PROFESSOR GEORGE S. GEIS UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW

2018 APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO NEW ALBANY CITY COUNCIL

SUBSTITUTED JUDGMENT AND EXTRAORDINARY TREATMENT. Substituted Judgment--Overview

Gun Owners Action League. Massachusetts Candidate Questionnaire. Name: Election Date: Office Sought: District: Mailing Address: Party Affiliation:

Item No Halifax Regional Council August 14, 2012

Forms Packet Copyright 2013

Refugee Council response to the 21 st Century Welfare consultation

Contract Law Notes - Table of Contents

The Judicial Branch. I. The Structure of the Judicial Branch: *U.S. Supreme Court

SUBCHAPTER II - ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE

Dispute Resolution Around the World. Venezuela

CBA Response to Private Prosecuting Association Consultation entitled. Private Prosecutions Consultation. 6 th March 2019

Order on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ING USA ANNUITY AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY)

CAPIC Submission on Part 16: Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (IRPR)

MASSACHUSETTS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY PROFESSOR ROBERT G. BURDICK BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW

IMMIGRATION Canada. Temporary Resident Visa. Nairobi Visa Office Instructions. Table of Contents. For the following countries:

OHIO CRIMINAL PROCEDURE DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR RIC SIMMONS THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY MORITZ COLLEGE OF LAW

West Tankers applies, so the Commercial Court points to other options in Nori Holdings Ltd v Bank Otkritie [2018] EWHC 1343 (Comm)

INTEGRITY COMMISSION BILL

Alternative Measures for Adult Offenders ALT 1. March 1, 2018 CHA 1 CHI 1 CRI 1 FIR 1 HAT 1 IPV 1 SEX 1

! EQUITY! LAWS%2015%!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1!

- Problems with e-filing, especially for people from lower-income backgrounds. - Receiving memos / communication from one side and not the other

Northern Source, LLC v Kousouros 2012 NY Slip Op 33203(U) February 22, 2012 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /2008E Judge: Paul G.

STALKING PROTECTION BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES

The AIA s Impact on Patent Litigation. Prepared by Christopher Dillon

Answer: The issue in this question is whether Donny acted in reliance of Ann s offer to get the reward of $1000.

Senate Bill 549 New Proffer Legislation

MICHIGAN WILLS AND DECEDENTS' ESTATES PROFESSOR JULIA BELIAN UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY SCHOOL OF LAW

FLORIDA ESSAY WRITING WORKSHOP PROFESSOR CHARLTON COPELAND UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF LAW

Supervised Legal Practice Guidelines (Legal Profession Act 2008)

Community Protection Notices and Public Space Protection Orders. County Policing Command. Superintendent David Buckley

IMMIGRATION Canada. Temporary Resident Visa. Pretoria Visa Office Instructions. Table of Contents. For the following countries:

Video Course Evaluation Form. Atty ID number for Pennsylvania: Name of Course You Just Watched

ROSE-HULMAN COMPLAINT RESOLUTION PROCEDURE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS EQUITY

GUIDELINES FOR GRANT APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RELOCATION

Transcription:

MARYLAND CONTRACTS DISTINCTIONS PROFESSOR BRENDAN HURSON UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND CAREY SCHOOL OF LAW CHAPTER 1: MARYLAND CONTRACTS DISTINCTIONS A. Frmatin f Cntracts 1. Mutual Assent Mutual assent: Offer + + cnsideratin + n valid Maryland Distinctin Means f Acceptance Maryland allws any methd f acceptance, unless therwise specified by the. Example 1: Rger is trying t sell his PlayStatin 4 fr $350. Dee can accept this ffer by any reasnable means (e.g., phne call, text, email, letter) but if Rger said specifically that Dee must accept by certified letter, then all the ther methds f acceptance wuld be inapprpriate. Electrnic signatures under the Unifrm Electrnic Transactins Act (UETA), an electrnic transactin may be agreed upn by bth parties, but such prvisin must be cnspicuus within the cntract and agreed t. Mailbx rule almst exclusively applies t bilateral cntracts (when there is ne prmise in exchange fr anther prmise) 2. Cnsideratin The legal detriment that is bargained fr in rder fr the cntract t exist Exam Tip 1: Cnsideratin is tested nearly every year n the Maryland Bar Exam. Can take the frm f: A return t d smething; A return prmise t frm ding smething legally permitted; The actual f sme act; r Refraining frm ding sme act. Maryland Distinctin Additinal Frms f Cnsideratin

Past cnsideratin: T prevent Prmise f marriage: While the prmise f is an adequate cnsideratin, n lawsuit fr any f prmise t marry will survive unless the fiancée is. Prmise t make a reciprcal will: Each persn names the ther as Example 2: Zack tells Kelly, If yu put me in yur will, I will name yu in mine and give yu my beach huse as a life estate. This is adequate cnsideratin because it is. 3. Prmises Binding withut Cnsideratin Maryland Distinctin Statute f Limitatins A prmise t pay a debt after the statute f limitatins has run is enfrceable withut new cnsideratin. Maryland has NO requirement fr a cntract t be under seal, but ding s raises the statute f limitatins t bring a breach f cntract suit frm three years t years Maryland Distinctin Prmissry Estppel Can be used t enfrce a prmise that is nt supprted by cnsideratin Example 3: Bb is ut f twn when a blizzard hits. Daryl, his gd friend and neighbr, shvels Bb s driveway. Bb returns and thanks Daryl, prmising t pay him $100. Bb desn t pay. Daryl sues Bb fr $100. Daryl will lse. A prmise is binding if: i) The prmisr shuld reasnably expect it t induce actin r frbearance n the part f the prmisee r third persn; ii) The prmise did induce such actin r frbearance; AND iii) can be avided by enfrcement f the prmise. Maryland requires prf f reliance by evidence B. Defenses t Cntract Frmatin After a breach, the breaching party can ffer defenses t shw that a cntract was nt frmed such that there was n meeting f the minds due t a mistake r misunderstanding, misrepresentatin,, undue influence,, r lack f capacity. Maryland Distinctin Rescissin Due t Mistake 2 2016 Themis Bar Review, LLC MD Cntracts Distinctins

Mistakes relate t a basic that materially affects perfrmance Unilateral mistake: May result in rescissin f a cntract when: The mistake is s severe that cntract enfrcement wuld be ; The mistake relates t a prtin f the cntract; and The party seeking rescissin was neither f nr the cause f the mistake. Mutual mistake: parties are mistaken as t an essential element f the cntract. Example 4: Denny and Dale cntract fr the sale f a cw. They bth think the cw is barren. When it turns ut that the cw is nt barren, rescissin might be permitted n the grund that bth parties made a mistake. Maryland permits t cmpensate a party which was harmed. Maryland permits the f written cntracts t fix a mistake, unless a third party is likely t suffer harm. Maryland Distinctin Lack f Capacity Parties must be cmpetent (i.e., have t be held t cntractual duties). Incmpetency: Arises frm infancy, r defect, guardianship,, and crprate incapacity Infancy: When an infant makes a cntract, it is by the infant but nt by the ther party; i.e., the infant may either disaffirm r the cntract and avid any liability under it r hld the adult party t the cntract. Example 5: Frank, age 16, ges t a car dealership with a check fr the full amunt f a used car. The dealership takes the check and gives Frank the car. The check bunces. The dealership cannt enfrce the cntract because Frank is under 18, which is the age f majrity in Maryland. Frank may als disaffirm any respnsibility related t the cntract, but he may als enfrce the cntract. Crprate incapacity: When a crpratin acts ultra vires (beynd its legal authrity), the cntract is Maryland curts have allwed recvery fr under quantum meruit when a crpratin cmmits an ultra vires act. MD Cntracts Distinctins 2016 Themis Bar Review, LLC 3

C. Defenses t Cntract Enfrcement Maryland Distinctin Uncnscinability A cntract (r part f ne) is s unfair t ne party that n in the psitin f the parties wuld have agreed t it Maryland curts have applied uncnscinability in cntracts f ( take it r leave it ) Maryland requires bth prcedural and uncnscinability t be present in rder t refuse t enfrce a cntract n the grunds f uncnscinability. Maryland Distinctin Public Plicy Nn-cmpete clauses: Maryland fllws the majrity rule that nn-cmpetitin clauses in emplyment cntracts will be enfrceable if the restraint is cnfined t what is reasnably necessary fr the prtectin f the business f the emplyer and d nt impse undue n the emplyee and are nt against public interest. D. Implied-in-Fact Cntracts and Quasi-Cntracts Maryland Distinctin Quasi-Cntractual Recvery By a plaintiff in breach: When there is n express cntract r there is an errr in an agreement t vid it, curts will allw quasi-cntract actins fr based n unjust enrichment r quantum meruit. This requires that: E. Discharge The plaintiff cnferred a benefit n the defendant; The defendant has f the benefit; The defendant the benefit and under the circumstances, equity requires that he wuld be unjustly enriched withut paying the plaintiff fr the benefit; The plaintiff had a reasnable expectatin f being paid; AND The plaintiff had. Exam Tip 2: This is a frequently tested tpic n the Maryland Bar Exam. Remember t check whether the plaintiff had clean hands. When there is a gd, lawful, vluntary cntract, with n frmatin defenses, a party can argue that his/her perfrmance is nt pssible because f impssibility, illegality, r impracticability. Maryland Distinctin Impracticability A party can successfully claim that his/her perfrmance was impracticable because f an unfreseen ccurrence; e.g., a huge increase in fuel csts. In Maryland, a seller cannt claim impracticability because f the failure f a surce f supply if the failure was at the time the cntract was frmed. 4 2016 Themis Bar Review, LLC MD Cntracts Distinctins

F. Third-Party Beneficiary Cntracts Maryland Distinctin First Restatement Maryland fllws the First Restatement f Cntracts with respect t third-party beneficiary cntracts (i.e., classifying third-party beneficiaries as creditr, dnee, r beneficiaries). Example 6: Chris agrees t paint Brun s huse in return fr Brun s prmise t pay $500 t Beyncé because Chris wes Beyncé $500. Beyncé is a creditr beneficiary and can recver the $500 frm Brun. If the prmisee entered the cntract fr the purpse f cnferring a gift n a third party, then the third-party dnee beneficiary is given the right t sue the prmisr. Example 7: Dnald pays Ted t build a huse fr Marc. Marc is a dnee beneficiary f the cntract between Dnald and Ted. An incidental beneficiary a beneficiary wh is nt a dnee r creditr beneficiary has n rights t enfrce the cntract. G. Assignment f Rights Maryland Distinctin Assignment f Rights In Maryland, the assignr s duties must be expressly assumed in all land sale cntracts by the assignee and cannt merely be implied. With regards t wage assignments, Maryland limits such matters t mnths, with special prvisins requiring them t be in writing and recrded prperly. H. Statute f Frauds Cntracts under the Statute f Frauds are unenfrceable unless they are. The memrandum must: Be in writing; Be signed by the party t be ; AND Cntain the essential r material f the deal. UETA: Electrnic dcumentatin satisfies the Maryland Statute f Frauds as a writing. I. Breach f Cntract and Remedies Maryland Distinctin Reasnable Certainty T recver damages, a plaintiff must prve the dllar amunt f damages within a reasnable certainty. MD Cntracts Distinctins 2016 Themis Bar Review, LLC 5

Maryland curts are hesitant t award because they are t speculative. Maryland Distinctin Other Damages Attrney s Fees: In Maryland, attrney s fees are generally nt recverable unless authrized by. Emtinal Damages: Damages fr emtinal distress are generally nt awarded in cntracts cases. Cst Damages: Maryland law allws a buyer t deduct the cst damages resulting frm a breach frm the price still due, as lng as the buyer first infrms the seller. [END OF HANDOUT] 6 2016 Themis Bar Review, LLC MD Cntracts Distinctins