On February 22, 2018, the Board of

Similar documents
ending November 16, BODA Cause number

on a probated suspension from the practice of law in Texas beginning November 17, 2017, and ending November 16, BODA Cause No

Bomba [# ], 62, of San Antonio,

DISBARMENTS On Sept. 27, Robert Joseph Smith [# ], 45, of Beaumont, was disbarred. An evidentiary panel of the District

public warning to Carbett J. Trey Duhon III, county judge of Waller

judgment when the criminal appeal is final. BODA Cause No On July 30, 2014, the Board of Disciplinary Appeals signed an interlocutory

Hasley Scarano, L.L.P. attorneys & counselors Our trial team has the experience and unparalleled success to get the right results.

COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE REPORT TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE

Uresti violated Canons 2A, 2B, and 3B(2) of the Texas Code of Judicial Conduct and Article V, Section 1-a(6) of the Texas Constitution.

Texas District 5A Grievance Committee

On April 11, the Board of Disciplinary

On July 26, 2016, the Board of Disciplinary

Code of Judicial Conduct.

Disciplinary Procedure 2.25, Bragg has. of 30 days from the date of the judgment

Appeals signed a final judgment of disbarment

STEVEN L. LEE DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS LAW OFFICE OF STEVEN L. LEE, P.C WEST AVENUE, SUITE 100 AUSTIN, TEXAS (512)

December, Tex. B.J. 1040

the appeal of James Okoro Okorafor [# ], 53, of Houston, from a judgment of active suspension signed on Oct. 21, 2010, by an evidentiary

Committee issued a public reprimand in Case No. S on June 13, BODA cause number

LIONE & LEE, P.C STECK AVENUE SUITE A-119 AUSTIN, TEXAS (512)

General questions regarding attorney discipline should be directed to the Chief Disciplinary Counsel s

On Sept. 19, 2006, the Board of Disciplinary Appeals dismissed for want of prosecution the appeal of the complainant

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS

General questions regarding attorney discipline should be directed

March, Tex. B.J Disciplinary Actions

107 ADOPTED RESOLUTION

On Feb. 5, 2007, the Board of Disciplinary Appeals dismissed for want of prosecution the appeal of Gordon M. White [# ], 47, of Richmond,

LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: JOSE W. VEGA RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT INTRODUCTION

LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: KEISHA M. JONES-JOSEPH NUMBER: 14-DB-035 RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT INTRODUCTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)

r'sti rorul'u7 l'j.'r?:i:':?i?':'+?' :l'?e'!'...':'d'j'i}"i't 17 JUN -2 PM 3: 30

HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS AND SUITES. 500 South Washington, Fredericksburg, TX

BEFORE THE DISTRICT 6 GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE EVIDENTIARY PANEL 6-1 STATE BAR OF TEXAS JUDGMENT OF FULLY PROBATED SUSPENSION. Parties and Appearance

DECISION RE: SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P (b)

Ethics for the Criminal Defense Lawyer

Supreme Court of Florida

People v. Crews, 05PDJ049. March 6, Attorney Regulation. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Respondent

THE NEW GRIEVANCE SYSTEM AND HOW TO AVOID IT. BETTY BLACKWELL Chair, Commission for Lawyer Discipline Standing Committee of The State Bar

STEVEN L. LEE LIONE & LEE, P.C STECK AVENUE SUITE A-119 AUSTIN, TEXAS (512)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) REPORT OF REFEREE. The following attorneys appeared as counsel for the parties:

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO B-1208 IN RE: DOUGLAS KENT HALL ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ANSWER BRIEF

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. SC Complainant, The Florida Bar File v. Nos ,011(17B) AMENDED REPORT OF REFEREE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 107,751. In the Matter of DAVID K. LINK, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

Supreme Court of Florida

OPINION AND ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS

* * * TONY L. SCHAFFER, * Respondent *

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before A Referee) No. SC Complainant, v. The Florida Bar File No ,593(15F) DAVID GEORGE ZANARDI

Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas. Texas State Bar Ethics Rules HIGHLIGHTS (SELECTED EXCERPTS)

To the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of. This matter was before us on a certification of default

4-E Grievance Committee in Case

ORIGINAL LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: SATRICA WILLIAMS-BENSAADAT NUMBER: 12-DB-046

1. The respondent requested to be placed on Voluntary Inactive Status, effective October 1, 2016, with the State Bar of Michigan.

publicly reprimanded in 1994 for violations of RPC 1.3, RPC 1.4(a) and RPC 1.5(c) (failure

LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: HILLIARD CHARLES FAZANDE III DOCKET NO. 18-DB-055 REPORT OF HEARING COMMITTEE # 37 INTRODUCTION

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA

NO. 01-B-1642 IN RE: CHARLES R. ROWE ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

People v. Varen Craig Belair. 17PDJ060. February 12, 2018.

To the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the. a certification of default filed by the District IIIB Ethics

Detroit, Ml Fax: (313)

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO TEXAS DISCIPLINARY RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

FORMAL OPINION NO [REVISED 2015] Lawyer Changing Firms: Duty of Loyalty

Reid A. Adler appeared on behalf of the Office of Attorney Ethics. Marc Allen Futterweit appeared on behalf of respondent.

BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

) No. SB D RICHARD E. CLARK, ) ) No Respondent. ) ) O P I N I O N REVIEW FROM DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION

Supreme Court of Florida

Opinion by Presiding Disciplinary Judge Roger L. Keithley and Hearing Board Members Helen R. Stone and Paul Willumstad, both members of the bar.

[Cite as Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Armon (1997), Ohio St.3d.] Attorneys at law -- Misconduct -- Permanent disbarment --

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) REPORT OF REFEREE. December 10, Thereafter, the Chief Judge of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit

SUBCHAPTER 1B - DISCIPLINE AND DISABILITY RULES SECTION DISCIPLINE AND DISABILITY OF ATTORNEYS

General questions regarding attorney discipline should be directed

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) v. The Florida Bar File No ,249(17F) ARTHUR NATHANIEL RAZOR REPORT OF REFEREE

CAROLE M. STANYAR 221 N. Main Street, Suite 300 Ann Arbor, MI (313)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO OPINION

[Cite as Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. Lavelle, 107 Ohio St.3d 92, 2005-Ohio-5976.]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) v. The Florida Bar File Nos ,023(17C) ,489(17C) WILLIAM ROACH, JR.

THE GRIEVANCE PROCESS

OVERVIEW. Common ethical issues. Most common grievances. How to prevent grievances. How to handle grievances. Patricia Cummings

Let Experience Work For You Attorney Discipline Defense and Law Firm Ethics Counseling. 48 Orders of Discipline and Disability.

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department D55582 M/htr

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 109,512. In the Matter of SUSAN L. BOWMAN, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

[SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) ARE UNCHANGED]

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Nicks, 124 Ohio St.3d 460, 2010-Ohio-600.]

KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION Ethics Opinion KBA E-430 Issued: January 16, 2010

To the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the. This matter was before us on a certification of default filed

(1131 Respondei7t's misconduct can be summarized as engaging in a practice of

Docket No. 26,646 SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO 2001-NMSC-021, 130 N.M. 627, 29 P.3d 527 August 16, 2001, Filed

Legal Referral Service Rules for Panel Membership

PUBLISHED AS A PUBLIC SERVICE BY THE OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL

S18Y0833, S18Y0834, S18Y0835, S18Y0836, S18Y0837. IN THE MATTER OF S. QUINN JOHNSON (five cases).

A Message to Legal Personnel

People v. Kevin D. Heupel. 17PDJ005. July 11, 2017.

MISSOURI S LAWYER DISCIPLINE SYSTEM

RULE UNLICENSED PRACTICE OF LAW; MULTIJURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE OF LAW

BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR. VSB Docket No , , , ORDER OF REVOCATION

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF GEORGIA DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS ) ) ) ) ) ) PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL MASTER

unearned retainers and converted bankruptcy estate funds to her own use.

Transcription:

Contact the Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel at (512) 453-5535, the Board of Disciplinary Appeals at (512) 475-1578 or txboda.org, or the State Commission on Judicial Conduct at (512) 463-5533. JUDICIAL ACTIONS To read the entire public sanctions, go to scjc.texas.gov. On March 1, 2018, the State Commission on Judicial Conduct issued an order of suspension, without pay, to Rodolfo Rudy Delgado, judge of the 93rd Judicial District Court for Hidalgo County. On March 1, 2018, the State Commission on Judicial Conduct filed a charging document requesting that the Special Court of Review appointed by the Supreme Court of Texas conduct a de novo trial in review of the commission s public admonition and order of additional education of Eric Hagstette, Jill Wallace, and Joseph Licata (collectively the Hearing Officers ) issued January 10, 2018. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCES DON T REPRESENT YOURSELF! How often do you advise clients to represent themselves when accused of wrongdoing? Why give yourself different advice? CONSULTATION OR REPRESENTATION STEVEN L. LEE OVER 30 YEARS EXPERIENCE 11 years experience with the State Bar of Texas as Assistant and Deputy General Counsel as well as Acting General Counsel LAW OFFICE OF STEVEN L. LEE, P.C. 1411 WEST AVENUE, SUITE 100 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 (512) 215-2355 Representing Lawyers & Law Students Since 1991 STATEWIDE REPRESENTATION BODA On February 22, 2018, the Board of judgment of public reprimand of Rochester, Michigan, attorney Paul Anthony Carthew [#00796315], 47. Carthew was reprimanded by consent by the attorney discipline board of the state of Michigan on October 31, 2012, for violating an order of discipline; holding himself out as an attorney while suspended from the practice of law; engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice; engaging in conduct that exposes the legal profession to obloquy, contempt, censure, or reproach; engaging in conduct that is contrary to justice, ethics, honesty, or good morals; and violating the standards or rules of professional responsibility adopted by the Supreme Court of Michigan. BODA Cause No. 60099. On February 22, 2018, the Board of judgment of suspension of Kemah attorney Juliann Kcenia Karenko [#24058887], 54. On November 16, 2017, Karenko was suspended from the practice of law for 10 days by consent of the Supreme Court of Florida for the following violations of the rules regulating the Florida Bar: competence, diligence, communication, expediting litigation, false statement of a material fact, failure to disclose a fact, and failure to respond to the bar. Karenko is suspended from the practice of law in Texas beginning March 9, 2018, and ending March 18, 2018. BODA Cause No. 60097. On February 28, 2018, the Board of judgment of suspension of Tampa, Florida, attorney Patricia Anne Horal [#24067667], 35. On November 9, 2017, Horal was suspended from the practice of law for 90 days by consent of the Supreme Court of Florida for the following violations of the rules regulating the Florida Bar: 4-5.3 [responsibilities regarding non-lawyer assistants], 4-5.4 [professional independence of a lawyer], 4-5.5 [unlicensed practice of law], and 4-7.18 [direct contact with prospective clients]. Horal is suspended from the practice of law in Texas beginning March 1, 2018, and ending May 29, 2018. BODA Cause No. 60096. DISBARMENTS On November 16, 2017, Hamilton Philip Lindley [#24044838], 41, of McGregor, was disbarred. An evidentiary panel of the District 8 Grievance Committee found that Lindley fabricated letters, forged client signatures, and falsified written agreements of other attorneys. Lindley violated Rules 8.04(a)(2) and 8.04(a)(3). He was ordered to pay $12,917.54 in attorneys fees and costs. Lindley has filed notice of intent to appeal. RESIGNATIONS On February 13, 2018, the Supreme Court of Texas accepted the resignation, in lieu of discipline, of Burt Lee Burnett [#00787171], 50, of Abilene. At the time of Burnett s resignation, there were eight pending matters against him alleging Burnett neglected cases; failed to communicate with clients; failed to provide written settlement disbursement statements to clients; failed to safeguard client funds; failed to promptly disburse funds; failed to return client files at the end of the representation; engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation; and failed to respond to grievances. Burnett violated Rules 1.01(b)(1), 1.03(a), 1.04(d), 1.14(a), 1.14(b), 1.15(d), 8.04(a)(3), and 8.04(a)(8). He was ordered to pay $838,455.91 in restitution. On February 13, 2018, the Supreme 292 Texas Bar Journal April 2018 texasbar.com

Court of Texas accepted the resignation, in lieu of discipline, of Rene Segundo [#17996999], 55, of Mission. At the time of his resignation, Segundo had four matters pending alleging he neglected clients matters, failed to keep clients informed, failed to safeguard clients funds, failed to return unearned fees, violated advertising rules, violated terms of a prior disciplinary judgment, failed to respond to grievances, failed to comply with cessation of practice rules, and practiced law while his license was suspended. Segundo violated Rules 1.01(b)(1), 1.03(a), 1.03(b), 1.14(a), 1.14(b), 1.15(d), 7.07(c), 8.04(a)(7), 8.04(a)(8), 8.04(a)(10), and 8.04(a)(11). SUSPENSIONS On February 7, 2018, Daniel Lucius Brown [#03108300], 64, of San Antonio, accepted an 18-month fully probated suspension effective February 15, 2018. An evidentiary panel of the District 10 Grievance Committee found that Brown neglected a client s matter and failed to keep a client reasonably informed. Brown violated Rules 1.01(b)(1), 1.03(a), and 1.03(b). He was ordered to pay $2,500 in attorneys fees and direct On February 8, 2018, David Castillo [#03984700], 57, of Harlingen, agreed to a 25-month partially probated suspension effective June 1, 2018, with the first 30 days actively served and the remainder probated. An evidentiary panel of the District 10 Grievance Committee found that Castillo failed to hold a client s funds in a trust account, failed to return the unearned portion of a fee, misrepresented facts related to his trust account, and violated terms of a disciplinary judgment. Castillo violated Rules 1.14(a), 1.14(b), 1.15(d), 8.04(a)(3), and 8.04(a)(7). He was ordered to pay $4,042.15 in attorneys On January 10, 2018, Mark Anthony Davis [#24012509], 46, of Victoria, accepted a 27-month partially probated suspension effective April 1, 2018, with the first 30 days actively served and the remainder probated. An evidentiary panel of the District 11 Grievance Committee found that Davis failed to keep a client reasonably informed, failed to return the unearned portion of a fee, and failed to respond to the grievance. Davis violated Rules 1.03(a), 1.15(d), and 8.04(a)(8). He was ordered to pay $2,500 in restitution and $800 in attorneys On January 5, 2018, Yexenia Gilmet [#24059821], 38, of Houston, received a six-month partially probated suspension effective March 4, 2018, with the first three months actively suspended and the remainder probated. An evidentiary panel of the District 4 Grievance Committee found that Gilmet frequently failed to carry out completely the obligations owed to her client, failed to keep her client reasonably informed about the status of her case, and failed to promptly comply with her client s reasonable requests for information. Upon Hasley Scarano, L.L.P. attorneys & counselors termination of the representation, Gilmet failed to refund unearned fees until after the grievance was filed. Gilmet violated Rules 1.01(b)(2), 1.03(a), and 1.15(d). She was ordered to pay $1,805 in attorneys fees and direct On December 13, 2017, James P. Grissom [#08511900], 70, of McAllen, received an 18-month partially probated suspension effective March 31, 2019, with the first six months actively served and the remainder probated. An evidentiary panel of the District 12 Grievance Committee found that Grissom failed to hold his client s funds in a trust account separate from his own property, failed to keep disputed funds in a trust account, and knowingly disobeyed an order by a tribunal. Grissom violated Rules 1.14(a), 1.14(c), and 3.04(d). He was ordered to pay $4,418.95 in attorneys fees and direct Two Riverway, Suite 1080 Houston, Texas 77056 texasbar.com/tbj Vol. 81, No. 4 Texas Bar Journal 293

On February 21, 2018, Henry Grun Jr. [#08556100], 64, of San Antonio, accepted a two-year fully probated suspension effective March 1, 2018. An evidentiary panel of the District 10 Grievance Committee found that Grun neglected a client s matter, failed to keep a client informed, acted as an intermediary without the necessary disclosures, and failed to return a client s file. Grun violated Rules 1.01(b)(1), 1.03(a), 1.03(b), 1.07(a)(1), and 1.15(d). He was ordered to pay $1,200 in attorneys On February 13, 2018, Stephen Whitson Mitchell [#14220900], 62, of Fort Worth, agreed to a 24-month fully probated suspension effective February 15, 2018. An evidentiary panel of the District 7 Grievance Committee found that upon receiving settlement funds in which the complainants had an interest, Mitchell failed to promptly deliver to the Will you REPRESENT YOURSELF? Socrates did and how did that turn out for him? BRUCE A. CAMPBELL OVER 25 YEARS EXPERIENCE IN DISCIPLINARY MATTERS AND LEGAL MALPRACTICE DEFENSE STATEWIDE PRACTICE CAMPBELL & ASSOCIATES LAW FIRM, PC 4201 SPRING VALLEY RD. SUITE 1250 DALLAS, TX 75244 972-277-8585 (O) 972-277-8586 (F) INFO@CLLEGAL.COM CLLEGAL.COM CLLEGAL.COM GRIEVANCE & LEGAL MALPRACTICE DEFENSE complainants funds that complainants were entitled to receive. Upon request by the complainants, Mitchell failed to promptly render a full accounting regarding such funds. Mitchell also communicated about the subject of the demand for accounting of funds when Mitchell knew the complainant was represented by another lawyer regarding that subject; Mitchell did not have the consent of the other lawyer nor was he authorized by law to make the communication. Mitchell violated Rules 1.14(b) and 4.02(a). He was ordered to pay $11,510 in restitution and $2,500 in attorneys On February 13, 2018, Stephen Whitson Mitchell [#14220900], 62, of Fort Worth, agreed to a 24-month fully probated suspension effective February 15, 2018. An evidentiary panel of the District 7 Grievance Committee found that after a settlement was reached in a RepresentingAttorneys Gaines West State-wide Practice State Bar of Texas Grievance Oversight Committee Appointed by the Texas Supreme Court Chair, 2006-2010 Member, 2004-2010 Texas Board of Disciplinary Appeals Appointed by the Texas Supreme Court Chairman, 2001-2003 Vice Chairman, 1994-1996, 1998-2000 Member, 1992-1996, 1997-2003 State Bar of Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Committee Member, 1993-1996 Disciplinary Review Committee Member, 1991-1992 Texas Bar Foundation, Fellow State Bar of Texas, Member Brazos County Bar Association, Member Austin Bar Association, Member Principal Office 979.694.7000 1515 Emerald Plaza College Station, TX 77845 Austin By Appointment 512.501.3617 1012 Rio Grande St. Austin, TX 78701 westwebblaw.com personal injury matter, Mitchell failed to promptly deliver to the complainant funds that the complainant was entitled to receive. Upon request by the complainant, Mitchell failed to promptly render a full accounting regarding such funds. Mitchell violated Rule 1.14(b). He was ordered to pay $7,765.62 in restitution and $1,500 in attorneys fees and direct On February 15, 2018, Christina J. Wanies-Guirgis [#24084772], 33, of Houston, accepted an agreed judgment of a three-year partially probated suspension effective February 1, 2018, with the first year actively suspended and the remainder probated. An evidentiary panel of the District 4 Grievance Committee found that Wanies-Guirgis neglected legal matters entrusted to her, failed to keep her clients reasonably informed about their cases, and failed to promptly comply with her clients reasonable requests for information. Upon termination of her representation, Wanies-Guirgis failed to refund advance payments of fees that were not earned. She also failed to respond to grievances. Wanies-Guirgis violated Rules 1.01(b)(1), 1.03(a), 1.15(d), and 8.04(a)(8). She was ordered to pay $2,400 in restitution and $1,000 in attorneys On January 11, 2018, Brent Marshall Wasserstein [#24039234], 42, of Houston, received a six-month fully probated suspension effective September 4, 2020. An evidentiary panel of the District 4 Grievance Committee found that Wasserstein failed to hold funds belonging to his client separate from his own property in a separate trust account. Wasserstein violated Rule 1.14(a). He was ordered to pay $701 in direct On February 20, 2018, Martha C. Wright [#22048800], 59, of Grand Prairie, received a 24-month partially probated suspension effective April 1, 294 Texas Bar Journal April 2018 texasbar.com

2018, with the first three months actively suspended and the remainder probated. An evidentiary panel of the District 6 Grievance Committee found that in or about September 2015, a complainant hired Wright to represent him with a foreclosure matter. In representing the complainant, Wright neglected the legal matter entrusted to her by failing to timely file pleadings, failed to keep the complainant reasonably informed about the status of a legal matter, and failed to promptly information from the complainant about a legal matter. Wright violated Rules 1.01(b)(1) and 1.03(a). She was ordered to pay $1,000 in attorneys fees and direct PUBLIC REPRIMANDS On November 21, 2017, Marshall E. Adamson [#00797973], 57, of Dallas, received a public reprimand. An evidentiary panel of the District 6 Grievance Committee found that on October 6, 2014, a complainant hired Adamson for representation in a probate matter. In representing the complainant, Adamson neglected the legal matter entrusted to him by failing to provide legal services. Adamson failed to keep the complainant reasonably informed about the status of the probate matter and failed to promptly information from the complainant about the matter. Upon termination of representation, Adamson failed to surrender papers and property to which the complainant was entitled. Adamson violated Rules 1.01(b)(1), 1.03(a), and 1.15(d). He was ordered to pay $2,137.50 in attorneys fees and direct On February 26, 2018, Sharon Malchar Easley [#06358440], 68, of Plano, agreed to a public reprimand. An evidentiary panel of the District 1 Grievance Committee found that Easley represented a complainant in a child custody suit. Easley neglected the com- plainant s legal matter by failing to appear in person at the trial scheduled. Easley violated Rule 1.01(b)(1). She was ordered to pay $225 in attorneys On February 7, 2018, Roger Fuller [#07524350], 56, of Dallas, received a public reprimand. The 101st District Court of Dallas County found that Fuller committed professional misconduct by failing to supervise his non-lawyer employees. Fuller violated Rule 5.03(a). He was ordered to pay $1,985 in attorneys On February 21, 2018, Dale S. Kasofsky [#11105225], 52, of McAllen, accepted a public reprimand. An evidentiary panel of the District 12 Grievance Committee found that Kasofsky failed to communicate with his clients. Kasofsky violated Rule 1.03(b). He ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE & CRIMINAL DEFENSE FEDERAL AND STATE JIM BURNHAM Former Chairman of the State Bar District 6 Grievance Committee Former President of the Dallas Bar Association Former Dallas Assistant District Attorney Dallas Bar Association Trial Lawyer of the Year Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers Law Offices of Jim Burnham 6116 N. Central Expy. Ste. 515 Dallas, Texas 75206 www.jburnhamlaw.com jim@jburnhamlaw.com Office: (214) 750-6616 was ordered to pay $1,500 in attorneys On February 22, 2018, Robert Chris Pittard [#00794465], 61, of San Antonio, accepted a public reprimand. The 285th District Court of Bexar County found that Pittard committed professional misconduct by failing, upon receiving funds or other property in which a client or third person has an interest, to promptly render a full accounting. Pittard violated Rule 1.14(b). He was ordered to pay $1,000 in attorneys On February 8, 2018, Christopher Sharkey [#18114150], 57, of Houston, received an agreed judgment of public reprimand. An evidentiary panel of the District 4 Grievance Committee found that in representing his client, Sharkey neglected the legal matter entrusted to him and failed to keep Your Reputation is Your Most Valuable Asset. Let me help you protect it. As a former Panel Chair and District 6 Grievance Committee Chair I have the experience to help you defend your reputation and livelihood. Call me at 214-336-7364 or email me at jhuey@hunthuey.com Hunt Huey PLLC 1717 McKinney Ave. Ste. 700 Dallas, Texas 75202 www.hunthuey.com www.legalethicstoday.com texasbar.com/tbj Vol. 81, No. 4 Texas Bar Journal 295

his clients reasonably informed about the status of their legal matter and to information. Sharkey violated Rules 1.01(b)(1) and 1.03(a). He was ordered to pay $700 in attorneys fees. PRIVATE REPRIMANDS Listed here is a breakdown of Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct violations for 10 attorneys, with the number in parentheses indicating the frequency of the violation. Please note that an attorney may be reprimanded for more than one rule violation. 1.01(b)(1) for neglecting a legal matter entrusted to the lawyer (2). 1.03(a) for failing to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and promptly comply with reasonable requests for information (1). 1.03(b) for failing to explain a Legal Malpractice Insurance Business Owner s Insurance Probate Bonds Cyber Coverage OVER 38 YEARS SUPPORTING TEXAS LAWYERS TLIE.org / info@tlie.org / (512) 480-9074 matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation (2). 1.14(b) Upon receiving funds or other property in which a client or third person has an interest, a lawyer shall promptly notify the client or third person. Except as stated in this rule or otherwise permitted by law or by agreement with the client, a lawyer shall promptly deliver to the client or third person any funds or other property that the client or third person is entitled to receive and, upon request by the client or third person, shall promptly render a full accounting regarding such property (3). 1.14(c) When in the course of representation a lawyer is in possession of funds or other property in which both the lawyer and another person claim interests, the property shall be kept separate by the lawyer until there is an accounting and severance of their interest. All funds in a trust or escrow account shall be disbursed only to those persons entitled to receive them by virtue of the representation or by law. If a dispute arises concerning their respective interests, the portion in dispute shall be kept separated by the lawyer until the dispute is resolved, and the undisputed portion shall be distributed appropriately (1). 1.15(d) for failing, upon termination of representation, to reasonably protect a client s interests, give notice to the client to seek other counsel, or surrender papers and property which belongs to the client (3). 5.03(a) for failing to make reasonable efforts to ensure that the nonlawyer s conduct is compatible with the professional obligations of the lawyer (1). 8.04(a)(2) A lawyer shall not commit a serious crime or commit any other criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects (1). TBJ 296 Texas Bar Journal April 2018 texasbar.com