[ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 15, 2010] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 2:16-cv NDF Document 29 Filed 03/23/17 Page 1 of 9

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED: OCTOBER 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

[ORAL ARGUMENT NOT SCHEDULED] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT : : : : MOTION TO GOVERN

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 19, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2, No (and consolidated cases) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 09/09/2014 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

ORU l;~]i ^i^totestodhhfw^

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

ORAL ARGUMENT HEARD ON SEPTEMBER 27, No and Consolidated Cases

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 10 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 779

Case 1:13-cv KBJ Document 46 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff-Appellee,

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 09/09/2011 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 07/19/2011 Page 1 of 8 [NOT SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] No

Case 2:17-cv WB Document 85 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. Petitioner v. CHANBOND, LLC Patent Owner

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ORIGINAL RECEIVED 2 Z015 ) ) ) ) ) ) PETITION FOR ) REVIEW ) ) ) No DEC FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA C

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD APRIL 12, 2016] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff Appellee,

ORAL ARGUMENT HELD DECEMBER 10, 2013 DECIDED APRIL 15, 2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON APRIL 15, 2016] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Defendants-Appellees.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON MARCH 31, Case No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 1:10-cv EGS Document 44 Filed 03/15/12 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Case: Document: Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/31/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No.

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 10/23/2015 Page 1 of Constitution Avenue,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT MOTION OF TELMATE, LLC FOR PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

PlainSite. Legal Document

CASE NO. 12- CAPITAL CASE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JOHN FERGUSON. Petitioner,

Case 7:16-cv O Document 85 Filed 03/27/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID 2792

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2 AND 3, 2016 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. CLEAN AIR COUNCIL, et al.,

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 08/28/2018 Page 1 of 15 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

Case 1:18-cv ABJ Document 19 Filed 02/13/18 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Defendants.

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFFREY ALEXANDER STERLING, and JAMES RISEN,

NITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS RECEIVEHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT PETITION FOR REVIEW

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOTION OF AMERICAN CABLE ASSOCIATION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement is made by and between: 1) Sierra Club; and 2)

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ReCEIVED FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCU CLERK

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. No. LIGHTING BALLAST CONTROL LLC, Applicant, v. UNIVERSAL LIGHTING TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Respondent.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

[NOT SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 1:18-cv JGK Document 26 Filed 02/21/19 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

PETITION FOR REVIEW. Pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Circuit

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 218 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APP: AJllS--~---- PETITION FOR REVIEW. and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 15( a), the Mozilla Corporation

Case 5:14-cv JPB Document 50 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 267

18 105G. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT Oi, FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMB &!IPANIC MEDIA COALITION, Petitioner CASE NO. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 2:17-cv WB Document 97 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 15, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Transcription:

Case: 09-1094 Document: 1212728 Filed: 10/26/2009 Page: 1 [ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 15, 2010] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT PUBLIC CITIZEN, ET AL., Petitioners, v. No. 09-1094 FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. JOINT MOTION OF PETITIONERS AND RESPONDENT TO HOLD CASE IN ABEYANCE PENDING THE ISSUANCE OF A NEW NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING Pursuant to Rule 27 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and D.C. Cir. Rule 27, Petitioners Public Citizen, et al., and Respondent Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA, hereby respectfully move this Court for an order holding proceedings in abeyance, pending further motions by the parties, to be filed upon issuance of a new Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM concerning the Hours of Service rule at issue in this case. Under the terms of a settlement executed by petitioners and FMCSA, the agency will submit a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB for approval within nine months of the date of settlement. Within 30 days of the publication of the NPRM in the Federal Register, the parties will file motions to govern further proceedings.

Case: 09-1094 Document: 1212728 Filed: 10/26/2009 Page: 2 1. The Petition for Review in this case challenges FMCSA s November 19, 2008 Final Rule on Hours of Service of Drivers, 73 Fed Reg. 69,567 (2008. Petitioners filed their opening brief on August 27, 2009. Respondent s brief is due (as extended October 27, 2009. The case is scheduled for argument January 15, 2010. 2. FMCSA has decided to review and reconsider the 2008 Rule. 3. In light of FMCSA s decision to reconsider the rule challenged here, the petitioners and FMCSA have entered into a settlement agreement. The agreement provides, inter alia, that: (1 petitioners and respondent will jointly move to hold the case in abeyance pending the issuance of the NPRM; (2 FMCSA will submit the NPRM to OMB for review nine months from the date of the settlement (October 26, 2009; and (3 FMCSA will publish a final rule within 21 months of the date of settlement. 4. An order holding this case in abeyance will serve judicial economy and prevent the expenditure of the resources of the Court and the parties. If FMCSA promulgates a new rule that is substantially different from the 2008 Rule, that may obviate the need for judicial review of the current rule. 5. Counsel has contacted intervenor William B. Trescott, who intervened in support of petitioners in this matter. Mr. Trescott indicated that he consents to the current motion. 2

Case: 09-1094 Document: 1212728 Filed: 10/26/2009 Page: 3 6. The undersigned counsel contacted Adam Sloan, counsel for Intervenors supporting respondent. Mr. Sloan stated that the Intervenors take no position on the motion. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, Petitioners and Respondent respectfully request an order holding this case in abeyance pending further motions by the parties, to be filed upon issuance of a new NPRM. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Michael Jay Singer MICHAEL JAY SINGER (202 514-5432 /s/ Gregory A. Beck /s/ Matthew M. Collette GREGORY A. BECK MATTHEW M. COLLETTE Public Citizen Litigation Group (202 514-4214 1600 20th St., N.W. Attorneys, Appellate Staff Washington, DC 20009 Civil Division, Room 7212 (202 588-1000 U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 3

Case: 09-1094 Document: 1212728 Filed: 10/26/2009 Page: 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on October 26, 2009, I filed the foregoing Motion of Petitioners and Respondent to Hold Case In Abeyance Pending The Issuance of A New Notice of Proposed Rulemaking with the Clerk of this Court by using the appellate CM/ECF system, which will send Notice of Electronic Filing to the following persons (as indicated, with additional counsel served by mail (as indicated: Gregory A. Beck [ECF] Adam C. Sloane [ECF] Public Citizen Litigation Group Mayer, Brown, LLP 1600 20th St., N.W. 1909 K. St., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20009 Washington, DC 20006 William B. Trescott [ECF] Paul D. Cullen, Sr. [ECF] 8028 Farm Market Rd. 457 The Cullen Law Firm Bay City, TX 77414 1101 30th St., NW, Ste. 300 Washington, DC 20007 Inimai Manickam Chettiar [ECF] Michael Livermore Stephen Gardner [ECF] New York University School of Law Center for Science & the Institute for Policy Integrity Public Interest 245 Sullivan St. 5646 Milton St. Suite 472, Furman Hall The Meadows Bldg., Suite 211 New York, NY 10012 Dallas, TX 75206 Nicholas J. DiMichael [Mail] John M. Cutler [Mail] Karyn A. Booth McCarthy, Sweeney, & Thompson Hine Hardaway 1920 N Street, NW, Suite 800 2175 K St., N.W., Suite 600 Washington, DC 20036 Washington, DC 20007

Case: 09-1094 Document: 1212728 Filed: 10/26/2009 Page: 5 Robin S. Conrad [ECF] Henry M. Jasny [Mail] National Chamber Litigation Center Advocates for Highway & 1615 H St., Suite 230 Auto Safety Washington, DC 20062 750 First St., NE, Suite 901 Washington, DC 20002 Robert Digges, Jr. [Mail] ATA Litigation Center 950 North Glebe Road Suite 210 Arlington, VA 22203 /s/ Matthew M. Collette Matthew M. Collette Counsel for Respondent