COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA

Similar documents
STAFF REPORT SAUSALITO CITY COUNCIL

Staff Report. Jeff Lewis, Director of Information Technology

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE AMENDING SECTIONS 35-2 AND 35-5 TO CHAPTER 35 OF THE BUTTE COUNTY CODE ENTITLED THE RIGHT TO FARM ORDINANCE.

SCC NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY CODE RELATING TO THE REGULATION OF SHOPPING CARTS

ORDINANCE NO The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Certified copy of portion of proceedings, Meeting of November 14,2017

City of Calistoga Staff Report

AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ADDING CHAPTER 6

IMPERIAL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM

County Of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

PISMO BEACH COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TRINITY COUNTY. Board Item Request Form Phone

Agenda Item A.2 CONSENT CALENDAR Meeting Date: June 16, 2009

ORDINANCE NO The Board ofsupervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

/ 8 ~Qb ORDINANCE NO.

INTERIM ORDINANCE NO. 1417

On April 6, 2015, the City Council introduced on first reading Ordinance No

STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: April 18, City Council. FROM: Regan M. Candelario, City Manager. PRESENTER: Claudia Laughter, City Clerk

RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 09/05/2017 AGENDA HEADING: Regular Business

ORDINANCE NO. 730 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALISTOGA AMENDING THE CALISTOGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND CHAPTER 8

ORDINANCE NO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF MARIN HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO. C.S AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND ADOPTING CHAPTER 9.86 OF THE STANISLAUS COUNTY CODE PROHIBITING CANNABIS ACTIVITIES

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONCORD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City of Pasadena is a charter city organized and existing. WHEREAS, Ordinance No of the City of Pasadena, adopted

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LA HABRA, CALIFORNIA REPEALING AND REPLACING SECTIONS AND OF CHAPTER 18.

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

COUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA (707) FAX (707)

WHEREAS, the Village of Buffalo Grove is a Home Rule Unit pursuant to the Illinois

ORDINANCE NO C.S.

WHEREAS, the City of Westminster, pursuant to its police power, may adopt

Commission Memorandum

ORDINANCE NO The City Council of the City of Moreno Valley does hereby ordain as follows:

RESOLUTION NO

CITY COUNCIL SUMMARY REPORT. Agenda No. Keywords: Sewer Connection Fee Ordinance Amendment October Meeting Date: PREPARED BY:

City of Lafayette Staff Report

ORDINANCE NUMBER 4286

County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING SECTION OF CHAPTER ( PARKING AND

STAFF REPORT SAUSALITO CITY COUNCIL

Item 08D 1 of 6

BEVERLY HILLS AGENDA REPORT. Meeting Date: February 7, 2017 Item Number: D 8 To:

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Yolo County, California

SONOMA COUNTY WASTE MANAGEMENT AGENCY ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

City of Grass Valley ilw_:. [:] Agenda Action Sheet. Joe C. Heckel, Community Development Direct Thomas Last, Planning Director

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION. John Montgomery, Director (949)

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TOWN CODE AMENDMENT A HOME OCCUPATIONS

Jeremy Craig, Interim Assistant City Manager/Director of Finance & IT

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Grover Beach is a General Law city organized pursuant to Article XI of the California Constitution; and

Butte County Board of Supervisors Agenda Transmittal

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

ORDINANCE NO

SUMMARY: BILL NUMBER: ORDINANCE NUMBER:

of any and all adopted City of Concord ( City ) zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations; and

require that cities provide for or allow the establishment and or operation of medical marijuana

ORDINANCE NO The Board of Supervisors of the County of Napa, State of California, ordains as follows:

The above recitals are all true and correct.

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 18

RESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. September 25, 2018

TOWN OF JACKSON TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA DOCUMENTATION

ORDINANCE NO The City Council of the City of Manteca does ordain as follows:

ORDINANCE NO. 08- THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MISSION VIEJO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, California Government Code Section provides, in pertinent

COOPER CHARTER TOWNSHIP RESOLUTION NO.

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NUMBER -2..Q.Q..3~) (City Council Series)

V:'.1. ITo: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. ?.>cou, Y > r ".*-<?- " 1. uz'por"

RESOLUTION NO BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 415, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, as follows:

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4673

City Attorney s Synopsis

AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE USE OF FIREWORKS IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF STANISLAUS COUNTY

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Item 8C 1 of 17

TOWNSHIP OF BYRON KENT COUNTY, MICHIGAN

ORDINANCE NO

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Choteau, Montana, that:

Appendix A: Draft Billboard Ordinance

SCC NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County Of Sacramento ordains as follows:

October 6, 2014 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council. THROUGH: Legislative Policy Committee (September 24, 2014)

URGENCY ORDINANCE NO O13

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PROVIDING FOR LAND USE PLANNING AND ZONING REGULATIONS AND RELATED FUNCTIONS.

City of Los Alamitos

TOWNSHIP OF WILBER IOSCO COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO ADOPTED: January 7, 2013 PUBLISHED: January 16, 2013

ORDINANCE NO. City Attorney s Synopsis

John Harpootlian Thursday, June 09, :38 AM Deborah Padovan Fw: Joint Los Altos/Los Altos Hills Senior Commission

CITY OF YPSILANTI NOTICE OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE Ordinance No. 1281

ORDINANCE NO Findings. The City Council hereby finds and declares the following:

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of American Canyon unanimously recommended approval of the proposed ordinance; and

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY OF COCOA BEACH, FLORIDA, as follows:

BOROUGH OF HOPATCONG ORDINANCE NUMBER

COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT. For the meeting of: July 10, 2018

STAFF REPORT JIM COPSEY, CHIEF OF POLICE/ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER

CITY OF KENT, OHIO ZONING CODE CHAPTER 1111 ZONING AMENDMENTS Page CHAPTER 1111 ZONING AMENDMENTS

Treasurer's Report Mr. Bell presented the Fiscal Recap for March The report was approved.

ORDINANCE NO

City of Grass Valley City zcouncil Agenda Action Sheet

"35. Hawkeye Avenue. On Hawkeye, Avenue from its intersection thereof with

Transcription:

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA Control No.: PLNP2011-00183 Type: ZOB TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CONTACT: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AN AMENDMENT TO THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY ZONING CODE PROHIBITING ANY USES INCONSISTENT WITH BOTH STATE AND FEDERAL LAW Leighann Moffitt, Interim Planning Manager, 874-5584, moffittl@saccounty.net PROJECT DESCRIPTION ASSESSOR S PARCEL NO(S).: County-wide LOCATION: County-wide APPLICANT: County of Sacramento Community Planning and Development Department 827 7 th Street, Room 230 Sacramento, CA 95819 REQUEST: An amendment to the Sacramento County Zoning Code to prohibit any uses inconsistent with State or Federal Law, or both. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: EXEMPT

An Amendment To The Sacramento County Zoning Code Prohibiting Any Uses Inconsistent With Both State And Federal Law Control No. PLNP2011-00183 Overview: This Ordinance results in an amendment to the Sacramento County Zoning Code to prohibit any land use, activity or establishment that contravenes either State or Federal law, or both. This ordinance is consistent with the County s current practices. Summary of Significant Issues: The impetus for this code amendment was the operation and establishment of medical marijuana dispensaries that are not permitted by the Zoning Code and are, therefore, an illegal use. The County initially contemplated introduction of an ordinance to regulate and permit such dispensaries; however, recent court decisions and federal actions have caused the County to reconsider that approach. This code amendment will apply County-wide and to any land use, activity or establishment that contravenes either state or federal law, or both. It is not limited to medical marijuana dispensaries. CPAC Recommendation: Because this item is simply a clarification of existing regulations and represents current practices, the item was not sent to each Community Planning Advisory Council (CPAC) for formal review and recommendation. However, a notice of the Planning Commission hearing, along with a link to this draft Code Amendment, was sent to all CPAC members for review and comment. Recommendation: Staff is recommending APPROVAL of the proposed Code Amendment. I. PROJECT ANALYSIS The impetus for this code amendment was the operation and establishment of medical marijuana dispensaries. Because the current zoning code does not expressly permit medical marijuana dispensaries, the establishment and operation of such dispensaries is an illegal use under the Zoning Code. The County initially contemplated introduction of an ordinance to regulate and permit such dispensaries; however, recent court decisions and federal actions have caused the County to reconsider that approach. This proposal is to add Section 101-14 to Title 1 of the Zoning Code to read as follows: Consistency with State and Federal Law. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Zoning Code, any land use, activity or establishment that contravenes either state or federal law, or both, is prohibited. Code Enforcement staff, as directed by the Board of Supervisors, have moved aggressively to take action against the numerous dispensaries. This aggressive action, combined with recent court decisions and the actions by the Federal government, has led to a substantial number of closures of unpermitted dispensaries. LCM:lcm:crg srplnp2011-00183 Code Amend Fed & State Law 2

An Amendment To The Sacramento County Zoning Code Prohibiting Any Uses Inconsistent With Both State And Federal Law Control No. PLNP2011-00183 II. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS This action will ensure that local land use regulations and activities are consistent with both Federal and State law. In addition, the County s current zoning code does not allow medical marijuana dispensaries to be permitted and this code amendment further reinforces that current situation. For these reasons, staff recommends APPROVAL of this proposal. A. Recommended Actions: 1. Environmental Documentation: Recognize the EXEMPT status of the request. 2. Ordinance: APPROVE the attached Ordinance of the Sacramento County Zoning Code prohibiting any uses inconsistent with both state and federal law. ATTACHMENT 1. An Ordinance of the Sacramento County Zoning Code Prohibiting Any Uses Inconsistent with Both State and Federal Law This staff report was prepared on November 2, 2011. LCM:lcm:crg srplnp2011-00183 Code Amend Fed & State Law 3

ATTACHMENT 1 SZC- AN ORDINANCE OF THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY ZONING CODE PROHIBITING ANY USES INCONSISTENT WITH BOTH STATE AND FEDERAL LAW The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sacramento, State of California, ordains as follows: WHEREAS, there may be inconsistencies between both State and Federal law regarding land uses; WHEREAS, the County of Sacramento desires to determine what types of land uses are permitted, conditionally permitted or prohibited within its boundaries; and WHEREAS, in order to protect the health, safety and welfare of the community, the County of Sacramento desires to add a provision to the Zoning Code which prohibits uses inconsistent with State or Federal law. FOLLOWS: follows: NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDAINS AS SECTION 1. Section 101-14 is added to Title 1 of the Zoning Code to read as 101-14 Consistency with State and Federal Law Notwithstanding any other provision of the Zoning Code, any land use, activity or establishment that contravenes either state or federal law, or both, is prohibited. SECTION 2. This ordinance was introduced and the title thereof read at the regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors on and on further reading was waived by vote of the Supervisors present. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on and after thirty (30) days from the date of its passage, and before the expiration of fifteen (15) days from the date 1

ATTACHMENT 1 of its passage it shall be published once with the names of the members of the Board of Supervisors voting for and against the same, said publication to be made in a newspaper of general circulation published in the County of Sacramento. On a motion by Supervisor, seconded by Supervisor, the foregoing ordinance was passed and adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Sacramento, State of California, this day of 2011, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Chair of the Board of Supervisors Of Sacramento County California (SEAL) ATTEST: Clerk, Board of Supervisors w:\ordinances\2011\federallawzoningcoderev.ord.doc 2