Warrantless Searches. Objectives. Two Types of Warrantless Searches. Review the legal rules Discuss emerging issues Evaluate fact patterns

Similar documents
DELMAR POLICE DEPARTMENT

Warrantless Search Problems and Answers

a) The entry is limited in purpose and scope to discovery of a number as to which there is no reasonable expectation of privacy;

DRAFT [8-4-15] TUFTS UNIVERSITY EXPERIMENTAL COLLEGE FALL 2015

TEXARKANA, TEXAS POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS MANUAL. TPCA Best Practices Recognition Program Reference Searches Without a Warrant

COVINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

23 Motions To Suppress Tangible Evidence

GENERAL ORDER PORT WASHINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT

Search Warrant Exceptions. Coach Presnell

NH DIVISION OF LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT AND LICENSING ADMINISTRATION & OPERATIONS MANUAL

Chapter 10 WHERE THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE DOES NOT APPLY

THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND

STATE V. GUTIERREZ, 2004-NMCA-081, 136 N.M. 18, 94 P.3d 18 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DEMETRIO DANIEL GUTIERREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Searches Conducted by Public School Officials under the Fourth Amendment

Roadmap. State v. Heien (NCSC), pg. 5. Criminal Case Update Part I 6/23/2014. When does Terry stop end?

14.2 Warrants and Illegal Searches and Seizures

5. Pursuit... 2:25 6. High Speed Chases... 2:26 III. IDENTIFICATIONS... 3:1 A. In-Person Identifications... 3:1 1. Right to Have Counsel Present...

OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF ST. MARY'S COUNTY, MD

15.4 Did the Officer Act within the Scope of the Seizure?

Public Copy CASPER POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES. Investigative Procedure: Search & Seizure. 4 - Operations 03C -

Maryland-National Capital Park Police Prince George s County Division DIVISION DIRECTIVE DISTRIBUTION EFFECTIVE DATE

2018 PA Super 183 : : : : : : : : :

Motion to Suppress Physical Evidence

California Supreme Court Creates a New Exception to the Search Warrant Requirement: People v. Sirhan

Policing: Legal Aspects

Knock and Talks : Obtaining Consent to Search

RESTRAINTS ON PLAIN VIEW DOCTRINE: Arizona v. Hicks* HISTORY OF THE PLAIN VIEW DOCTRINE

Implied Consent Testing & the Fourth Amendment

MINNESOTA v. DICKERSON 113 S.Ct (1993) United States Supreme Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE SEARCH INCIDENT TO ARREST WARRANTLESS COLLECTION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION FROM CELL PHONES DEEMED UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

QUESTION 6. Alan gave the arrest warrant to Bob, an undercover police officer, and told Bob to contact Debbie and pretend to be a hit man.

GENERAL ORDER OAK BROOK POLICE DEPARTMENT OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS

No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. BRIMA WURIE, Respondent.

The Fourth Amendment

ORDER TYPE: NEED TO KNOW. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to define legal implications and procedures involved when a search is performed.

REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 1998 DONNA L. SAMPSON STATE OF MARYLAND

STATE V. GANT: DEPARTING FROM THE BRIGHT-LINE BELTON RULE IN AUTOMOBILE SEARCHES INCIDENT TO ARREST

SEARCH AND SEIZURE: CAN THEY DO THAT?

Laws of Arrest, Search, & Seizure. Instructor: Judge Mark Arnold (310) Fall, Course Outline

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Traffic Stop Scenario Jeff Welty October 2016

FEDERAL CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: THE BASICS. Glen A. Sproviero, Esq. Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP New York, New York

Criminal Justice in America CJ Chapter 7 James J. Drylie, Ph.D.

STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : BROWN COUNTY. vs. Case No. 12 CF BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

v. Record No OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN November 1, 2002 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

The Post-Katz Problem of When "Looking" Will Constitute Searching Violative of the Fourth Amendment

State of Wisconsin: Circuit Court: Milwaukee County: v. Case No. 2008CF000567

Privacy and the Fourth Amendment: Basics of Criminal Procedural Analysis for Government Searches and Seizures

SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

TRAINING OBJECTIVES. Review Search & Seizure Law Relating To Probation/Parole. Describe the Plain View Doctrine

MINNESOTA V. DICKERSON United States Supreme Court 508 U.S. 366, 113 S.Ct. 2130, 124 L.Ed.2d 334 (1993)

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. State of New Hampshire. Carlos Perez 07-S-3385; 08-S-155 ORDER ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS

In the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. BENJAMIN CAMARGO, JR., Petitioner, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

The Hackers Guide to Search and Arrest. by Steve Dunker J.D. It is legal for an Officer at any time to Ask a person to stop and talk.

S17G1691. CAFFEE v. THE STATE. We granted certiorari to consider whether the warrantless search of

MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE IN SUPERIOR COURT

Video Course Evaluation Form. Atty ID number for Pennsylvania: Name of Course You Just Watched

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 119,013 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,

Supreme Court of the United States

.3 Before being presented to a judge, all applications for search warrants are to be reviewed by the State's Attorney s Office for approval.

Criminal Justice A Brief Introduction

S IN THE SUPREME COURT

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CASE NO. 1D Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

A. Guidelines for Conducting Reasonable Searches and Seizures (4-4282)

HOW TO WRITE ESSAYS FOR CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW SCHOOL AND BAR EXAMS. WHAT to Say and HOW to Say It! Tim Tyler Ph.D.

Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 2

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,597 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, JOSHUA PAUL JONES, Appellant.

Introduction to the Constitution and Law Enforcement Exam

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. BLAKE J. REED, Defendant NO. COA Filed: 6 March 2007

Supreme Court of Louisiana

United States Court of Appeals

NOTES. The Law Catching Up with the Evolution of Cell Phones: Warrantless Searches of a Cell Phone are Unconstitutional Under the Fourth Amendment

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 113,576 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, TRAE D. REED, Appellee.

United States Constitutional Law: Theory, Practice, and Interpretation

Askew v. State. Court of Appeals of Georgia March 12, 2014, Decided A13A2060

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF WAYNE ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

No. 11SA231 - People v. Coates Suppression of Evidence. The People brought an interlocutory appeal pursuant to

Court of Appeals of Ohio

The Fourth Amendment places certain restrictions on when and how searches and seizures

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cr EAK-MAP-1.

v No Kent Circuit Court

POLICE TRAFFIC STOPS & HOW SHOULD YOU ACT? WHAT ARE YOUR RIGHTS. Special Report Handling A Police Traffic Stop

traditional exceptions to warrant requirement

Ten Situations in Which the Trespass Theory of the Fourth Amendment Might Matter

Criminal Procedure Outline

Issue presented: application of statute regarding warrantless blood draws. November 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Constitutional Law - Search and Seizure - Hot Pursuit

('I 1 FOR PUBLICATION. 2 TIS..,' -'j rii 1 : qg 3 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE 4 COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS-

2016 VT 65. No On Appeal from v. Superior Court, Windsor Unit, Criminal Division. Amy Koenig February Term, 2016

Know Your Rights ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION. Protecting Rights and Defending Freedom on the Electronic Frontier eff.org

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,956 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. KIMBERLY WHITE, Appellant,

INVESTIGATIVE ENCOUNTERS AT A GLANCE COMMAND LEVEL TRAINING CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 2015 COURTESY PROFESSIONALISM RESPECT

El1l. 0 3!s;t. JUL 0 3 ton8 CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COUR10F OHIO CLERK OF COURT SUPREME CUURT OF OHIO COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE, KEVIN PETERSON

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON (CC 08CR0785FE; CA A144832; SC S060351)

Transcription:

Warrantless Searches Jeff Welty UNC School of Government welty@sog.unc.edu (919) 843-8474 Objectives Review the legal rules Discuss emerging issues Evaluate fact patterns Two Types of Warrantless Searches Actions that are not searches at all No reasonable expectation of privacy The Fourth Amendment does not apply Searches that fall within an exception to the warrant requirement 1

Fourth Amendment Flow Chart Reasonable expectation of privacy? Y Valid warrant? N Exception to the warrant requirement? N Search prohibited. N Y Y Not a search. Activity permitted. Search permitted within scope of warrant. Search permitted within bounds of exception. Actions That Are Not Searches Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches A search means a governmental intrusion on a reasonable expectation of privacy Subjective component Objective component Open Fields Curtilage: The area directly and intimately connected with the [home] and in proximity to it. State v. Courtright, 60 N.C. App. 247 (1983) Open fields: Anything outside the curtilage. No REP in Open Fields. [A]n open field is not... entitled to Fourth Amendment privacy protection State v. Nance, 149 N.C. App. 734 (2002) 2

Common Entranceways The absence of a closed or blocked gate... creates an invitation to the public... Thus, we will not extend [the defendant s] expectation of privacy to his driveway, walkway or front door area. United States v. Lakoskey, 462 F.3d 965 (8 th Cir. 2006) Determinations can be fact-intensive Has this doctrine gone too far? Plain View [W]hen a[n] officer is able to detect something by... his senses while lawfully present at the vantage point where those senses are used, it is not a Fourth Amendment search. Wayne R. LaFave, Search and Seizure 2.2. Enhancing the senses Beyond enhancing the senses Abandoned Property and Garbage Abandoned property is not subject to Fourth Amendment protection. United States v. Pitts, 322 F.3d 449 (7th Cir.2003) When is real property abandoned? When is personal property abandoned? Discarded property Denial of ownership 3

Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement Warrantless searches are presumptively unreasonable. United States v. Karo, 468 U.S. 705 (1984) [E]xceptions to the warrant requirement are few in number and carefully delineated. Welsh v. Wisconsin, 466 US 740 (1984) Consent Another exception to the warrant requirement is a search which follows... voluntary consent... [T]he essence of this exception is a waiver of the constitutional right to privacy. United States v. Stone, 471 F.2d 170 (7 th Cir. 1972) Who may consent? Validity of consent Scope of consent Exigent Circumstances [T]he exigent circumstances exception... may apply... where there is a compelling need for official action and no time to secure a warrant. State v. Phillips, 151 N.C. App. 185 (2002) Requires probable cause plus exigency When does exigency dissipate? Emerging issue: officer-created exigency 4

Vehicles Exception is justified because of the pervasive schemes of regulation, which necessarily lead to reduced expectations of privacy, and the exigencies attendant to ready mobility. California v. Carney, 471 U.S. 386 (1985) Can be searched on PC alone Scope is limited by the PC But not by locked containers Searches Incident to Arrest Justified by officer safety and need to prevent the destruction of evidence Requires a valid custodial arrest But search may precede arrest Extends to grab space Gant and vehicles Emerging issues Gant and personal effects Digital devices Terry Frisks [A] reasonable search for weapons [is permitted] for the protection of the police officer, where he has reason to believe that he is dealing with an armed and dangerous individual. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) Requires valid stop and reasonable suspicion Scope and plain feel Emerging issue: Arizona v. Johnson 5

Other Exceptions Probation searches Border searches Emerging issue: laptops Impoundment/inventory searches Checkpoints and other special needs searches Learn More Robert L. Farb, Arrest, Search and Investigation in North Carolina (3 rd ed. 2003) Wayne R. LaFave, Search and Seizure (4 th ed. 2004) North Carolina Criminal Law Blog, sogweb.sog.unc.edu/blogs/ncclaw/ Warrantless Searches Jeff Welty UNC School of Government welty@sog.unc.edu 6