Do we have to? What if we don t? DAMN! For Real? Ok what do we have to do? GUILTY! What can we do to them? What if they don t do as we tell them?

Similar documents
Chorney v. The Owners, Strata Plan VIS770 Page 2 [1] THE COURT: The petitioners seek orders declaring that the respondent, Chris Pepperdine, has contr

Civil Resolution Tribunal. Indexed as: The Owners, Strata Plan LMS 2900 v. Mathew Hardy, 2016 CRTBC 1. The Owners, Strata Plan LMS 2900 APPLICANT[S]

JUNIPINE HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION Resolution of the Board of Directors ENFORCEMENT RESOLUTION RECITALS

Civil Resolution Tribunal. Indexed as: Betuzzi v. The Owners, Strata Plan K350, 2017 CRTBC 6. Mark Betuzzi APPLICANT

ABANDONED PROPERTIES BYLAW BYLAW NO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

BYLAW NUMBER 33M2016

3RD SESSION, 41ST LEGISLATURE, ONTARIO 67 ELIZABETH II, Bill 14. An Act with respect to the custody, use and disclosure of personal information

Anti-social Behaviour Act 2003

Date Issued: October 25, 2013 File: Indexed as: Bratzer v. Victoria Police Department and others, 2013 BCHRT 266

ARRANMORE HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION Resolution of the Board of Directors RECITALS

CBABC POSITION PAPER ON THE CIVIL RESOLUTION TRIBUNAL AMENDMENT ACT, 2018 (BILL 22) Prepared by: Canadian Bar Association, BC Branch

Authority: Item 8, Planning Committee Report (PED10115(a)) CM: November 30, 2011

Chico, CA Code of Ordinances. Chapter 9.38 NOISE

THOMPSON-NICOLA REGIONAL DISTRICT BYLAW NO A bylaw respecting the enforcement of bylaw notices

Restatement Third, Property (Servitudes) American Law Institute Selected sections

IBSA Harassment Policy

BOARD OF VARIANCE ORDERS AND ISSUES. Sandra Carter & Pam Jefcoat. Valkyrie Law Group LLP. October 2009

Reports and Complaints in Basketball...making basketball safer

RECOMMENDATION Direct the City Manager to draft ordinance language that would allow private property owners to manage parking on their property.

Forest Appeals Commission

Telephone Number: [03] Tuesdays commencing at 6.15 p.m., or such other day nominated.

Legal actions: tackling anti social behaviour

PRACTICE DIRECTION 37A APPLICATIONS AND PROCEEDINGS IN RELATION TO CONTEMPT OF COURT

COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA

The Municipality of Chatham-Kent Code of Conduct for Members of Council

PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA. Mineral Resources (Sustainable Development) Amendment Bill 2012

SECURITY SERVICES AND INVESTIGATORS ACT

DATA MATCHING AGREEMENTS ACT 1 B I L L

Bylaw Notice Enforcement Bylaw No. 1636, 2013 adopted October 28, 2013

2013 CONDOMINIUM PROPERTY 2013 CHAPTER 7. An Act to amend The Condominium Property Act, 1993

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL PRACTICE MANUAL

Delegation of Director s Authority, Residential Tenancy Act and Manufactured Home Park Tenancy Act DELEGATION MATRIX March 16, 2012

SENATE FILE NO. SF0132. Sponsored by: Senator(s) Scott and Representative(s) Stubson and Walters A BILL. for

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

2ND SESSION, 41ST LEGISLATURE, ONTARIO 66 ELIZABETH II, Bill 68. An Act to amend various Acts in relation to municipalities

Seminar Note. Harassment, Nuisance and (Un) Neighbourly Disputes A New Neighbour Principle? Recent Statutory Reforms in Singapore

Local Court Amendment (Company Title Home Unit Disputes) Act 2013 No 6

2014 Bill 13. Second Session, 28th Legislature, 63 Elizabeth II THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ALBERTA BILL 13 CONDOMINIUM PROPERTY AMENDMENT ACT, 2014

BERMUDA POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY ACT : 29

Neighbour Complaints Procedure

CITY OF YORKTON BYLAW NO. 22/2018

POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY ACT 1998 BERMUDA 1998 : 29 POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY ACT 1998

1990 CHAPTER S HER MAJESTY, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan, enacts as follows:

BYLAWS OF HERITAGE LAKE RESORT CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. ARTICLE I Name and Purpose

RESPONSE TO TACKLING ROGUE LANDLORDS AND IMPROVING THE PRIVATE RENTAL SECTOR

Complainant v. The College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia

APRIL 2017 RECOGNITION AND PREVENTION OF DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT & VIOLENCE POLICY

ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR POLICY

EMERGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 1636

Access to Personal Information Procedure

2ND SESSION, 41ST LEGISLATURE, ONTARIO 66 ELIZABETH II, Bill 68. (Chapter 10 of the Statutes of Ontario, 2017)

PROTECTION FOR PERSONS IN CARE ACT

ISSUES RELATING TO PATIENTS WHO LACK LEGAL CAPACITY TO MAKE THEIR OWN CHOICES

City of Calistoga. Code Enforcement Manual for Public Nuisance Abatement

Amended Bill No. 26, Ordinance No. 26, Session 2015 ARTICLE 1751 Nuisance Abatement

This booklet may not be commercially reproduced, but copying for other purposes, with credit, is encouraged.

Bylaw No The Drainage Bylaw, 2005

Housing and Planning Act Civil Penalties

PERSONAL INFORMATION PROTECTION ACT

CITY OF HAMILTON BY-LAW NO Council Code of Conduct:

Financial Services Tribunal. Practice Directives and Guidelines

INVESTIGATION REPORT LOBBYIST: Keltie Gale. May 23, 2018

Civil penalties under the Housing and Planning Act 2016

Rugby Ontario Policy Manual

2012 Bill 6. First Session, 28th Legislature, 61 Elizabeth II THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ALBERTA BILL 6

Assembly Bill No. 481 Committee on Ways and Means

Rules of Procedure 10/2018

RESOLUTION OF THE EAGLE VIEW CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION REGARDING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR COVENANT AND RULE ENFORCEMENT

BYLAWS OF ISLANDER HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. A North Carolina Nonprofit Corporation Under the Laws of the State of North Carolina

SRA General Election Rules

STANDARD BY-LAWS STRATA TITLES ACT 1985 (AS AMENDED) SCHEDULE 1 BY-LAWS 1. DUTIES OF PROPRIETOR, OCCUPIERS ETC. A proprietor shall:

BYLAW A BYLAW OF STRATHCONA COUNTY TO REGULATE AND CONTROL SURFACE DRAINAGE AND SITE GRADING WITHIN STRATHCONA COUNTY.

BILL 8 AND AMENDMENTS TO THE STRATA PROPERTY ACT & REGULATIONS

Resolving tenancy disputes

Policy Number:

Trade Secrets Acts Compared to the UTSA

The Council of La Trobe University makes this Statute under section 30 of the La Trobe University Act 1964.

POLICY MANUAL PART ONE INTRODUCTION AND INTERPRETATION OF POLICY. The interpretation of the Code of Conduct will be at the discretion of the Council.

ALBERTA OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION AND PRIVACY COMMISSIONER ORDER P September 10, 2018 PRIMARIS MANAGEMENT INC. Case File Number

TOWN OF COCHRANE. Bylaw 29/2018

Private Sector Housing Civil Penalties Policy

District of Columbia Court of Appeals Historic Courthouse 430 E Street, NW Washington, DC (202)

PART 2 REGULATED ACTIVITIES Chapter I Regulated Activities 3. Regulated activities. Chapter II The General Prohibition 4. The general prohibition.

Five Year Review of the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA)

ORDINANCE NO. 878 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE REGARDING NOISY ANIMALS

Investigation Report. Complaint about a Saskatchewan Employment Act Adjudicator

ADMINISTRATIVE FAIRNESS GUIDEBOOK

VACANT BUILDING MAINTENANCE LICENSE RESOLUTION

MANITOBA FREEDOM OF INFORMATION AND PROTECTION OF PRIVACY RESOURCE MANUAL

NO SIDEWALK CAFÉS REGULATION BYLAW A BYLAW OF THE CITY OF VICTORIA

REQUEST FOR THE COUNCIL S CONSTITUTION TO BE AMENDED TO ADOPT NEW POWERS UNDER THE ANTI- SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR CRIME AND POLICING ACT 2014

2009 Bill 19. Second Session, 27th Legislature, 58 Elizabeth II THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ALBERTA BILL 19 LAND ASSEMBLY PROJECT AREA ACT

BODY CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT ACT 1997

NEW JERSEY STATUTES ANNOTATED TITLE 26. HEALTH AND VITAL STATISTICS CHAPTER 3A2. LOCAL HEALTH SERVICES II. COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ACT

Antisocial Behaviour etc. (Scotland) Bill

FIREWORKS BYLAW BYLAW NO

Order F Ministry of Justice. Hamish Flanagan Adjudicator. March 18, 2015

Police stations. What happens when you are arrested

Transcription:

Do we have to? What if we don t? DAMN! For Real? Ok what do we have to do? GUILTY! What can we do to them? What if they don t do as we tell them?

Strata titled properties represent 46% of all sales in the Victoria Real Estate Board.

Strata Corporations artificial entities created by the legislature to represent the interests of a group of individual owners. The owners who make up the membership of Strata Corporation represent a microcosm of our society as such their needs, wants, desires, and values are often divergent.

Where needs, wants and values diverge, in the absence of structure, chaos rules. In the words of Thomas Hobbes

Life in that state of war of each against all wasn t something to be desired.

This is Canada, and we aren t really into chaos up here. We know what we truly value and those values are etched right into our constitution.

In order to ensure that Strata Corporations benefited from Peace, Order and Good Government some form of control was necessary. Thankfully the legislature ensured that all Strata Corporations would have the basic tools necessary to remove them from the state of nature.

The Strata Property Act provides that all strata corporations, regardless of their size, have bylaws. Those that haven t adopted their own custom bylaws are deemed to be governed by the Standard Bylaws that are attached as a schedule to the Strata Property Act.

Nature of bylaws Part 7 Bylaws and Rules 119 (1)The strata corporation must have bylaws. (2)The bylaws may provide for the control, management, maintenance, use and enjoyment of the strata lots, common property and common assets of the strata corporation and for the administration of the strata corporation. Standard Bylaws 120 (1)The bylaws of the strata corporation are the Standard Bylaws except to the extent that different bylaws are filed in the land title office. (2)On deposit of the strata plan an owner developer may file bylaws that differ from the Standard Bylaws.

Bylaws serve as a strata corporation s governing law. The Social Contract that binds the owners and directs them towards a common goal. Bylaws can be tailored to reflect the values of its members and may differ substantially from strata to strata

Strata Corporations have tools in the forms of bylaws, rules and the Strata Property Ac to ensure that our blissful state of POGG is maintained. However, tools, like bylaws and rules, are only valuable if they are used. If they are not used, they are no more than flowery words on a page.

There appear to be three schools of thought when it comes to enforcing the bylaws and rules.

I call these three schools of the thought.

The legislature foresaw that some Strata Councils may be inclined not to do anything with the tools that they had been given. Not only did the legislature see fit to ensure that Strata Corporations have bylaws. They also required Strata Corporations to enforce the bylaws.

Section 26 of the Strata Property Act Council exercises powers and performs duties of strata corporation 26 Subject to this Act, the regulations and the bylaws, the council must exercise the powers and perform the duties of the strata corporation, including the enforcement of bylaws and rules.

Section 26 of the Strata Property Act Council exercises powers and performs duties of strata corporation 26 Subject to this Act, the regulations and the bylaws, the council must exercise the powers and perform the duties of the strata corporation, including the enforcement of bylaws and rules.

Section 26 of the Strata Property Act Council exercises powers and performs duties of strata corporation 26 Subject to this Act, the regulations and the bylaws, the council must exercise the powers and perform the duties of the strata corporation, including the enforcement of bylaws and rules.

Section 26 of the Strata Property Act Council exercises powers and performs duties of strata corporation 26 Subject to this Act, the regulations and the bylaws, the council must exercise the powers and perform the duties of the strata corporation, including the enforcement of bylaws and rules.

Section 26 of the Strata Property Act Council exercises powers and performs duties of strata corporation 26 Subject to this Act, the regulations and the bylaws, the must council exercise the powers and perform the the duties of the strata corporation, including enforcement of bylaws and rules.

Section 26 of the Strata Property Act requires councils to enforce the bylaws and rules of the Strata Corporation. Simply put

At this stage I can predict what you are thinking We actually have to enforce the bylaws???...

In truth, Strata Corporations can be made to enforce the bylaws. The legislature saw to that to by enacting section 165 of the Strata Property Act: Other court remedies 165 On application of an owner, tenant, mortgagee of a strata lot or interested person, the Supreme Court may do one or more of the following: (a)order the strata corporation to perform a duty it is required to perform under this Act, the bylaws or the rules; (b)order the strata corporation to stop contravening this Act, the regulations, the bylaws or the rules; (c)make any other orders it considers necessary to give effect to an order under paragraph (a) or (b).

The Civil Resolution Tribunal has made litigation faster, easier and cheaper. This has also enabled Strata Corporations and their owners to litigate disputes that were hitherto too small or not important enough to justify the costs or efforts involved with litigation before the supreme court. Where litigation used to be reserved for repair and maintenance issues and issues where significant sums of money were at stake, now we are seeing more litigation surrounding the enforcement, or lack of enforcement of the bylaws.

Section 165 allows owners to apply to the Court or the Civil Resolution Tribunal for an order compelling the Strata Corporation or the Council to enforce the bylaws. Both the Supreme Court and the Civil Resolution Tribunal have taken Councils to task for failing or refusing to enforce the bylaws. Chorney v. The Owners, Strata Plan VIS770, 2013 BCSC 14 D.W. v. The Owners, Strata Plan BCS XXX, 2017 BCCRT 107 Fox v. The Owners, Strata Plan KAS 1911, 2017 BCCRT 137 Masse et al v. The Owners, Strata Plan VIS 6348 et al, 2018 BCCRT 112

As a result of the new relative ease of litigation, another change occurred. There used to be a prevailing belief or unwritten agreement that if no one was complaining too loudly about bylaw violations, Councils would simply look the other way, even if they were aware of them. It looked something like this.

It also looks like this. I see a lot of this occurring.

Now the prevailing belief is that if a strata council or an individual member becomes aware of a bylaw breach they are under a positive duty to take action to enforce the bylaws. This duty even extends to the point that in the absence of an outside complaint, a Council member must make the complaint and then recues themselves from dealing with the complaint when it comes before the rest of Council.

So to be clear: This is discouraged and This is encouraged

The case law shows that Strata Corporations have no choice but to enforce the bylaws. So what do you do?

If the Strata Corporation receives a complaint, or the Council discovers a bylaw violation and initiates their own enforcement process there are certain procedures it must follow.

Once more the legislature had the foresight to appreciate that Strata Corporations would need some guidance on enforcing the bylaws. It published a guide to a enforcing the bylaws. While that guide isn t as thorough as some of the reference materials we have become used to ---- It does set out the minimum requirements for enforcing the Bylaws.

Section 135 of the Strata Property Act sets out the procedures it provides as follows: Complaint, right to answer and notice of decision 135 (1)The strata corporation must not (a)impose a fine against a person, (b)require a person to pay the costs of remedying a contravention, or (c)deny a person the use of a recreational facility for a contravention of a bylaw or rule unless the strata corporation has (d)received a complaint about the contravention, (e)given the owner or tenant the particulars of the complaint, in writing, and a reasonable opportunity to answer the complaint, including a hearing if requested by the owner or tenant, and (f)if the person is a tenant, given notice of the complaint to the person's landlord and to the owner. (2)The strata corporation must, as soon as feasible, give notice in writing of a decision on a matter referred to in subsection (1) (a), (b) or (c) to the persons referred to in subsection (1) (e) and (f). (3)Once a strata corporation has complied with this section in respect of a contravention of a bylaw or rule, it may impose a fine or other penalty for a continuing contravention of that bylaw or rule without further compliance with this section.

The procedural requirements of section 135 of the Strata Property Act can be summarized as follows: 1. Receipt of the complaint (as noted before recent thought is that the Strata Council itself can be the source of the complaint). 2. The Council must investigate the complaint. 3. Provisions of written notice of the complaint to the accused (which must give the accused a reasonable opportunity to respond including an opportunity to respond at a Council hearing). 4. Once the accused has responded or been given a reasonable opportunity to respond, the council must decide whether a bylaw or rule has been broken by the accused. 5. If the council decides that a bylaw or rule has been broken, it must then decide how to enforce the bylaw or rule against the accused and provide written notice of its decision, as soon as feasible to: the accused; and the landlord and owner.

Many Strata Corporations fall short of meeting their procedural obligations under section 135 of the Strata Property Act by: Failing to investigate the complaint received; Dismissing the complaint without taking any due diligence; Failing to provide written notice of the complaint to the subject of the complaint; Failing to provide an opportunity for a written response or a hearing; Jumping to conclusions as to the guilt of the subject of the complaint; Demanding a payment of a fine in the letter that sets out the notice of complaint and the right to respond; Failing to provide a fair hearing.

INVESTIGATING THE COMPLAINT

INVESTIGATING THE COMPLAINT Many, if not the majority of complaints that Councils receive are regarding alleged nuisances by an owner. The Standard Bylaws and almost all custom bylaws contain prohibitions against the creation of nuisances. A nuisance is defined as an act or use of property that unreasonably interferes with a neighbor s use of their property. The use of the term unreasonably means that nuisances are based on an objective standard. In other words you must determine what the average reasonable person tolerate in like circumstances.

INVESTIGATING THE COMPLAINT The subjective feelings of the complainant are not determinative, particularly if they are overly sensitive. It takes into consideration the neighborhood, and construction of the building.

INVESTIGATING THE COMPLAINT The problem with nuisances being determined on an objective standard is that proving them requires objective evidence. Few complainants provide objective evidence. Obtaining objective evidence can be tricky and usually requires some investigation on the part of the Council.

INVESTIGATING THE COMPLAINT Strata Councils must make reasonable efforts to investigate the alleged breach which may include: Attending a strata lot to attempt to observe unreasonable noise or odors coming into a strata lot; Providing notice of entry to a strata lot (if the bylaws allow) to investigate for possible violations of a bylaw (usually laying down unauthorized hard surface flooring). Meeting with witnesses including the complainant and accused Reviewing audio and video recordings of the incidents.

INVESTIGATING THE COMPLAINT Strata Councils must make reasonable efforts to investigate the alleged breach which may include: Obtaining audio or video recordings of unreasonable sound with the complainant s consent; Obtaining opinions from experts regarding a possible breach of a bylaw ie. structural, envelope engineers for alterations, acoustic engineers for flooring, medical doctors for exposure to second hand smoke; Obtaining written witness statements.

INVESTIGATING THE COMPLAINT Strata Councils must make reasonable efforts to investigate the alleged breach which may include: Obtaining a legal opinion

INVESTIGATING THE COMPLAINT One thing Councils should not do to investigate alleged bylaw violations is use video surveillance. See the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner Order P09-02 (Shoal Point Strata Council)

PROVIDING NOTICE

PROVIDING NOTICE The written notice of the complaint: Must set out the details of the complaint including: The time, date and description of the complaint; The bylaw that was allegedly breached; The evidence in support of the alleged breach Must state that the accused has an opportunity to respond in writing or request a hearing before council. Should provide a deadline for responding or requesting a hearing. Should set out what will happen if the accused doesn t respond or request a hearing in time.

PROVIDING NOTICE The written notice of the complaint: Must Not state that the Council has found the accused guilty of the alleged breach. Must Not state that the accused must pay a fine.

THE HEARING

THE HEARING Unfortunately there are no rules or regulations in the Strata Property Act or the Regulations regarding Council Hearings. The best advice is to follow the rules of natural justice by ensuring that: The rules that the hearing will be conducted by are known by each party before the hearing: The procedure of the hearing (in terms of who speaks when) Amount of time each party will be given to speak; Which witnesses if any will be called Evidence (if any) is exchanged by each party at a set time prior to the hearing. The Council (not the property manager) conducts the hearing; The hearing is held at a neutral location, not a council member s home, the accused s home or the complainant s home;

THE HEARING Unfortunately there are no rules or regulations in the Strata Property Act or the Regulations regarding Council Hearings. The best advice is to follow the rules of natural justice by ensuring that: Council members who are witnesses, complainants or an interest in the matter recues themselves; The hearing must be held incamera, to the exclusion of owners, occupants and tenants that are not the witnesses or the accused. The Accused must be given a reasonable opportunity to speak and to call witnesses if he has any. The Council must be and must appear to be open minded. The Council must not make statements indicating that they have prejudged the situation or have come to the hearing with their minds made up.

THE HEARING The Council should make it clear at the outset of the hearing, specifically that the accused and complainant that a decision will not be rendered on the spot. Both sides should be ensured that they will be fully heard and that a decision will be rendered after they ve departed. Council must only discuss the evidence presented at the hearing and then make their decision after the accused and witness have left.

THE HEARING The hearing should be conducted in calm and professional manner. Try to keep tempers from flaring.

THE DECISION

THE DECISION Councils must provide a written decision on the subject of a hearing within 7 days. The requirement to provide a written decision does not explicitly state what the decision must constitute however the laws of natural justice do give us some guidance. The written decision should: address the evidence and submissions in support of and against the alleged breach of the bylaws. Address the credibility of any witnesses. State the decision of the Council and the reasons the Council reached its decision including any authorities relied on; Set out what the Council orders ie: fines, or remedial work under sections 85 or 133. Remember though if more information is required in order for Council to render a fully considered decision then the decision of Council might be for the accused or the complainant to submit more evidence.

REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO THE COUNCIL

REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO THE COUNCIL There is nothing in the Strata Property Ac that requires a council to fine a guilty party. The enforcement options found in sections 85,129 and 133 are prefaced by the word may.

REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO THE COUNCIL Strata Councils have a number of remedies available to them: 1.) Give the guilty party a warning not to do it again

REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO THE COUNCIL Strata Councils have a number of remedies available to them: 2.) Fine the relevant party pursuant to section 130 of the Strata Property Act

REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO THE COUNCIL Strata Councils have a number of remedies available to them: 3.) Ban the relevant party pursuant to section 129 of the Strata Property Act

REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO THE COUNCIL Strata Councils have a number of remedies available to them: 4.) Remove items from the common property or do work to a strata lot to remedy a breach pursuant to section 133 of the Strata Property Act

REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO THE COUNCIL Strata Councils have a number of remedies available to them: 4.) Remove items from the common property or do work to a strata lot to remedy a breach pursuant to section 133 of the Strata Property Act

REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO THE COUNCIL Strata Councils have a number of remedies available to them: 5.) For extreme and repeated breaches the ultimate remedy is available.

REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO THE COUNCIL Strata Councils have a number of remedies available to them: 5.) For extreme and repeated breaches the ultimate remedy is available. Forced Sale either for failure to pay fees; or for extreme bad behaviour

Strata Corporations have multiple options to enforce their decisions if the owners don t play along: 1. Applications to the Civil Resolutions Tribunal to resolve disputes 2. Applications to the Small Claims Court / CRT to collect fines. 3. Applications to the BC Supreme Court to collect strata fees and special levies. 4. Applications to the BC Supreme Court to obtain an injunction requiring an owner to do something.

While it is true that the Courts have invalidated fines where Strata Corporations have failed to follow the provisions of the Strata Property Act. Terry v The Owners, Strata Plan NW 309, 2016 BCCA 449, That said take heart.

Strata Corporations are run by volunteer and mostly unpaid councils. Most of the council are may up of lay people. The courts recognize these facts and for the most part, show deference to the decisions of strata councils and are reluctant to intervene. It is usually only where councils fall well short of meeting the required procedures that they will penalize the council or intervene.

JUST DO YOUR BEST