Analysis of Hispanic-White Differences in Traffic Stops and. Searches in Winston Salem, NC,

Similar documents
Racial Disparities in Police Traffic Stops in North Carolina,

Analyzing Racial Disparities in Traffic Stops Statistics from the Texas Department of Public Safety

Policing the Powerless How Black Political Power Reduces Racial Disparities in Traffic Stops Outcomes

Policing the Powerless: How Black Political Power Reduces Racial Disparities in Traffic Stop Outcomes

Eroding Trust, Policing Anger. How Racial Disparities in Traffic Stops Threaten Democratic Values

Suspect Citizens. What 20 Million Traffic Stops Tells Us about Policing and Race

Racial Profiling Report Full report

Written traffic warnings

Racial Profiling Report Full report

CPD TRAFFIC STOPS AND RESULTING SEARCHES IN 2013

Racial Profiling Report Full report

SEGUIN POLICE DEPARTMENT

REPORT TO THE STATE OF MARYLAND ON LAW ELIGIBLE TRAFFIC STOPS

Racial Profiling Report

Racial Profiling Report Full report

August/September Drive Sober or Get Pulled Over NATIONAL LEL WEBINAR. June 21, 2017

CEDAR HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT RACIAL PROFILING ANALYSIS

Handbook for Strengthening Harmony Between Immigrant Communities and the Edmonton Police Service

Approve Agenda Mr. Fidanque moved, Lt. Col. Willeford seconded, and the subcommittee unanimously approved the agenda.

A GUIDE TO POLICE SERVICES IN TORONTO

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,900 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, JOSEPH E. THAYER, Appellant.

Preliminary Report James D. Ginger, Ph.D. Peso Chavez, etal. v. Illinois State Police, etai.

Executive Summary Plano Police Department Racial Profiling Report 1

HIGH COSTS TO LOCAL COMMUNITIES WITH FEDERAL IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT

APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for La Crosse County: RAMONA A. GONZALEZ, Judge. Affirmed.

2017 Citizen Survey of Police Surveys Citizen Survey Introduction 1

Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Identifying a Baseline for Comparison... 13

Washington State University Assistant Professor of Political Science,

OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR

A Power-Law of Death

TARRANT COUNTY COLLEGE DISTRICT POLICE DEPARTMENT RACIAL PROFILING ANALYSIS

Contents. Legal Guide for Police Constitutional Issues 10 th Edition Jeffery T. Walker and Craig Hemmens. Preface. Chapter 1.

STATE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE 12 POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL JULY 1, 2002 ARREST PROCEDURES

No. 117,992 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, ERIC WAYNE KNIGHT, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

URBANA POLICE DEPARTMENT: 2017 TRAFFIC STOP UPDATE

Warrantless Searches. Objectives. Two Types of Warrantless Searches. Review the legal rules Discuss emerging issues Evaluate fact patterns

PROCEDURE Simple Cautions. Number: F 0102 Date Published: 9 September 2015

Zoila Ponce de Leon. Phone: (919) Homepage:

Double Oak Police Department. Racial Profiling

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. GEORGE ERVIN ALLEN, JR., Defendant NO. COA03-406

Amarillo Police Department

United States Supreme Court Term: Cases Affecting Criminal Law and Procedure

Case 2:10-cv SD Document 48 Filed 12/03/13 Page 1 of 29 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RANKING PLAN FOR LIBRARIANS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL KATHRINE R. EVERETT LAW LIBRARY

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 7 November 2017

Officers may use their discretion when determining the proper on-scene action.

An in-depth examination of North Carolina voter attitudes on important current issues

Disruptive Demographics: Implications for North Carolina s Health and Competitiveness

ORLANDO POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURE , BIAS-FREE POLICING 1. PHILOSOPHY

RACIAL DISPARITIES IN FLORIDA SAFETY BELT LAW ENFORCEMENT

D A N I E L A U G U S T E

Exhibit B. Case 1:16-cv WO-JEP Document Filed 07/11/18 Page 1 of 11

Security Without Equity? The Effect of Secure Communities on Racial Profiling by Police

WARRENVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAINING SEMINAR

Appellant No. 758 WDA 2012

Disruptive Demographics and the Triple Whammy of Geographic Disadvantage for America s Youth

SUBJECT: DUTY MANUAL ADDITION- DATE: August 25, 2013 L DOCUMENTING LIMITED DETENTIONS DURING SELF-INITIATED PEDESTRIAN AND/OR VEHICLE STOPS

1 of 5 9/16/2014 2:02 PM

Disproportionate Minority Contact. by Moire Kenny Maine Statistical Analysis Center Muskie School of Public Service

Racial Profiling Report Tier two

UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT

Pretrial Services and Bail Funds Increasing Access to Justice

Hispanic Community Needs Assessment for El Vínculo Hispano/The Hispanic Liaison. Summary of Results

College of the Mainland Police Department Racial Profiling Policy

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,195 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, MICHAEL DEAN HAYNES, Appellant.

15.4 Did the Officer Act within the Scope of the Seizure?

Overview of the AARTO Amendment Bill & the Points Demerit System. By Mr Japh Chuwe: Registrar/Chief Executive Officer 9 March 2016

Arkansas Professional Bail Bondsman License Application(s) Module 1

CHAPTER 3 SECTION VI 10/01/16 Vehicle Searches

Christopher J. Clark (Last updated May 2018)

Roadblock Revelations:

Voters Support Community College Ban on Illegal Immigrants

The Road Safety (Amendment) Law of 2000 is published in the Cyprus Government Gazette according to Section 52 of the Constitution.

Grade 5. Giving teens a civic voice, editorial and questions, attached Persuasive Essay Assignment, attached

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

CLASS STATE (LAST) ZIP CODE SAMPLE P.I. P.D. CONTRIBUTED TO ACCIDENT SAFETY BELTS DOT NUMBER. 24) (c) Driving off Road While Passing Vehicle

Suspects Who Refuse to Identify Themselves By Jeff Bray, Senior Legal Advisor, Plano, Texas, Police Department

DISTRICT COURT CRIMINAL

GENERAL POLICE ORDER CLEVELAND DIVISION OF POLICE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PLAINTIFFS THIRD REPORT TO COURT AND MONITOR ON STOP AND FRISK PRACTICES

Traffic Stop Scenario Jeff Welty October 2016

NORTH CAROLINA RULES OF EVIDENCE JUST THE RULES SERIES

MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE POLICY AND PROCEDURES

Arrest, Search, and Seizure

The Hackers Guide to Search and Arrest. by Steve Dunker J.D. It is legal for an Officer at any time to Ask a person to stop and talk.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE UNC ASSOCIATION OF STUDENT GOVERNMENTS 41st SESSION,

A QUICK GUIDE TO THE COURT

JOSHUA T. WASSINK Curriculum Vitae September 2018

COVINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Student Constitution. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. (as amended January 23, 2016)

Automatic License Plate Reader Privacy Model Bill

Disruptive Demographics and the Triple Whammy of Geographic Disadvantage

Chief Christopher Lyddy Fairfield Police Department

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 1 September Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 28 February 2014 by Judge

Roadmap. State v. Heien (NCSC), pg. 5. Criminal Case Update Part I 6/23/2014. When does Terry stop end?

Criminal Case Update District Court Judges Conference June 2005 (includes cases decided from September 1, 2004 through June 7, 2005)

ROLE AND AUTHORITY WRITTEN DIRECTIVE: 1.10 EFFECTIVE DATE: REVISION DATE: SUPERSEDES EDITION DATED:

CHAPTER 17 - ARREST POLICIES Alternatives to Arrest and Incarceration Criminal Process Immigration Violations

Graeme T. Boushey. Assistant Professor. Department of Political Science, University of California, Irvine (2012 to Present)

Transcription:

Analysis of Hispanic-White Differences in Traffic Stops and Searches in Winston Salem, NC, 2002-2013 Frank R. Baumgartner, Derek Epp, and Kelsey Shoub 1 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Department of Political Science Contact: Frankb@unc.edu June 10, 2015 1 Baumgartner is the Richard J. Richardson Distinguished Professor of Political Science at UNC- Chapel Hill. Epp and Shoub are graduate students in political science. We thank UNC undergraduates Katherine B. Elliott, Amirah Jiwa, Morgan Herman, and Reena Gupta for assistance on the logistics of this project. We also acknowledge the assistance of the NC Department of Justice and State Bureau of Investigation for making available the official statistics on which this analysis relies, and for answering technical questions about the organization of this complex database.

Table 1. Overview of the Data Data Subsets Observations Total stops 408,516-2014 16,213 -Passengers 3,099 -Checkpoint stops 82 Stops for analysis 389,285 Searches 7,678 Search Rate = 1.97 Figure 1. Number of Traffic Stops per Year 2

Figure 2. Ethnic Composition of Traffic Stops by Year 3

Table 2. Ethnic Composition of Traffic Stops by Purpose, Drivers Percent Purpose Number White Hispanic Total Stops 389,285 50.05 10.40 Speed Limit 130,771 60.20 7.35 Stop Light/Sign 28,652 50.84 11.20 Driving Impaired 3,027 57.55 22.73 Safe Movement 19,229 53.38 11.89 Vehicle Equipment 46,911 38.95 12.51 Vehicle Regulatory 109,399 45.38 8.88 Seat Belt 13,341 44.97 10.24 Investigation 11,109 36.48 18.84 Other Vehicle 26,846 39.70 21.05 Note: Includes only drivers. Excludes 82 checkpoint stops. Excludes 3,099 passengers. Table 3. Percent Searched by Ethnicity and Purpose of Stop Ratio Purpose Number % Total % White % Hispanic Hispanic:White Total Stops 389,285-50.05 10.40 - Total Searches 7,678 1.97 1.56 3.01 1.93 Speed Limit 130,771 0.82 0.58 1.66 2.86 Stop Light/Sign 28,652 1.40 1.01 1.99 1.97 Driving Impaired 3,027 38.62 42.35 42.15 1.00 Safe Movement 19,229 5.04 4.90 7.21 1.47 Vehicle Equipment 46,911 2.34 2.01 2.68 1.33 Vehicle Regulatory 109,399 1.26 0.88 1.52 1.73 Seat Belt 13,341 1.93 1.26 2.56 2.03 Investigation 11,109 5.74 5.69 3.82 0.67 Other Vehicle 26,846 2.57 2.22 2.11 0.95 Note: See the appendix for this same table broken down for Men and Women. 4

Figure 3. Difference in Likelihood of Being Searched, by Ethnicity and Type of Stop 5

Figure 4. Ethnic Differences in the Likelihood of Search 6

Figure 5. Ethnic Differences in the Liklihood of Search by Gender 7

Figure 6. Ethnic Differences in the Liklihood of Search by Gender, for Drivers Under 30 8

Figure 7. Search Rates by Ethnicity, Gender, and Age Group 9

Figure 8. Number of Stops, by Ethnicity and Gender 10

Figure 9. Percent of Stops Resulting in a Search, by Ethnicity and Gender Table 4. Type of Search by Ethnicity Ratio Search Type Number % Total % White % Hispanic Hispanic:White Total Stops 389,285-50.05 10.40 - Total Searches 7,678 1.97 1.56 3.01 1.39 Consent 2,081 0.53 0.42 0.62 1.48 Search Warrant 3 - - - - Probable Cause 1,509 0.39 0.23 0.29 1.26 Incident to Arrest 4,015 1.03 0.90 2.08 2.31 Protective Frisk 70 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.50 Note: See the appendix for this same table separately for Men and Women. 11

Table 5. Distribution of Officer IDs by Stop Number of Stops Officers w/ this many Stops Percent of Officers Cumulative Percent Percent of Stops Cumulative Percent 1 2,424 51.77 51.77 0.62 0.62 2 10 1,020 21.79 73.56 0.94 1.56 11-100 473 10.10 83.66 4.72 6.28 101 1,000 689 14.72 98.38 64.94 71.22 1,001 + 76 1.62 100.00 28.77 100.00 Total 4,682 100-100 - Figure 10. Number of Hispanic and White Motorists Stopped, by Officer 12

Figure 11. Number of Hispanic and White Motorists Searched, by Officer 13

Figure 12. Percent of White and Hispanic Drivers Searched, by Officer 14

Appendix Table A1. Ethnic Composition of Traffic Stops by Purpose, Passengers Percent Purpose Number White Hispanic Total Stops 3,099 31.98 13.23 Speed Limit 392 34.75 9.69 Stop Light/Sign 129 29.17 6.98 Driving Impaired 146 57.58 32.19 Safe Movement 334 41.06 21.26 Vehicle Equipment 549 29.52 12.39 Vehicle Regulatory 687 29.89 8.44 Seat Belt 164 31.21 14.02 Investigation 370 27.44 14.32 Other Vehicle 328 26.67 13.11 Table A2. Percent of Men Searched by Ethnicity and Purpose of Stop Ratio Purpose Number % Total % White % Hispanic Hispanic.:White Total Stops 232,053-51.27 12.98 - Total Searches 6,384 2.75 2.00 3.87 1.94 Speed Limit 75,633 1.19 0.75 2.19 1.66 Stop Light/Sign 17,018 1.96 1.34 2.58 1.93 Driving Impaired 2,320 42.20 46.52 43.40 0.93 Safe Movement 12,497 6.39 5.57 8.98 1.61 Vehicle Equipment 29,681 3.05 2.45 3.26 1.33 Vehicle Regulatory 61,005 1.85 1.17 2.08 1.78 Seat Belt 9,302 2.46 1.48 3.04 2.05 Investigation 7,238 7.23 6.52 4.81 0.74 Other Vehicle 17,359 3.39 2.80 2.75 0.98 Table A3. Percent of Women Searched by Ethnicity and Purpose of Stop Ratio Purpose Number % Total % White % Hispanic Hispanic:White Total Stops 157,232-48.38 6.59 - Total Searches 1,294 0.82 0.92 0.49 0.53 Speed Limit 55,138 0.32 0.33 0.20 0.61 Stop Light/Sign 11,634 0.58 0.56 0.36 0.64 Driving Impaired 707 26.87 32.93 26.92 0.82 Safe Movement 6,732 2.54 3.71 0.81 0.22 Vehicle Equipment 17,230 1.11 1.25 0.55 0.44 Vehicle Regulatory 48,394 0.52 0.51 0.21 0.41 Seat Belt 4,039 0.72 0.78 0.71 0.91 Investigation 3,871 2.97 3.94 1.08 0.27 Other Vehicle 9,487 1.05 1.23 0.27 0.22 15

Table A4. Type of Search by Ethnicity: Men Ratio Search Type Number % Total % White % Hispanic Hispanic:White Total Stops 232,053-51.27 12.98 - Total Searches 6,384 2.75 2.00 3.87 1.94 Consent 1,747 0.75 0.55 0.80 1.45 Search Warrant 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Probable Cause 1,250 0.54 0.29 0.38 1.31 Incident to Arrest 3,323 1.43 1.13 2.67 2.36 Protective Frisk 61 0.03 0.02 0.02 - Table A5. Type of Search by Ethnicity: Women Ratio Search Type Number % Total % White % Hispanic Hispanic:White Total Stops 157,232-48.38 6.59 - Total Searches 1,294 0.82 0.92 0.49 0.53 Consent 334 0.21 0.23 0.10 0.43 Search Warrant 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Probable Cause 259 0.16 0.12 0.04 0.33 Incident to Arrest 692 0.44 0.56 0.36 0.64 Protective Frisk 9 0.01 0.01 0.00-16

Figure A1. Stops by Day of the Week 17

Figure A2. Searches by Day of the Week 18

Figure A3. Stops by Hour of the Day 19

Figure A4. Searches by Hour of the Day 20

Figure A5. Ethnic Differences in the Likelihood of Search: Consent Searches Only Table A6. Likelihood of Finding Contraband Given a Search, by Ethnicity Contraband Number % Total % White % Hispanic Yes 2,130 27.74 27.60 15.68 No 5,548 72.26 72.40 84.32 Total 7,678 100.00 100.00 100.00 Table A7. Differential Outcomes by Whether or not a Search Occurs Race Search N No Verbal Written Citation Occur Action Warning Warning Issued Arrest Total White No 171,856 1.69 19.62 6.07 72.16 0.45 100.0 Hispanic No 39,271 1.95 12.81 4.25 79.98 1.01 100.0 Total No 381,607 2.03 20.28 5.44 71.72 0.54 100.0 White Yes 2,725 0.92 5.14 2.97 32.55 58.42 100.0 Hispanic Yes 1,218 0.41 2.87 4.52 28.65 63.55 100.0 Total Yes 7,678 1.00 5.11 3.27 38.85 51.77 100.0 21