Citizens Union and the League of Women Voters of New York State

Similar documents
Citizens Union and the League of Women Voters of New York State

Michigan Redistricting Ballot Proposal (VNP)

Background Information on Redistricting

TX RACIAL GERRYMANDERING

WHERE WE STAND.. ON REDISTRICTING REFORM

CITIZENS REDISTRICTING COMMISSION PROPOSAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

REDISTRICTING REDISTRICTING 50 STATE GUIDE TO 50 STATE GUIDE TO HOUSE SEATS SEATS SENATE SEATS SEATS WHO DRAWS THE DISTRICTS?

Redrawing the Map: Redistricting Issues in Michigan. Jordon Newton Research Associate Citizens Research Council of Michigan

Summary of the Fair Congressional Districts for Ohio Initiative Proposal

The Very Picture of What s Wrong in D.C. : Daniel Webster and the American Community Survey

VNP Policy Overview. Davia Downey, Ph.D Grand Valley State University

New York Redistricting Memo Analysis

Putting an end to Gerrymandering in Ohio: A new citizens initiative

Colorado Secretary of State Toni Larson League of Women Voters of Colorado 1410 Grant, Suite B204, Denver, Co Toni.Larsongmail.

3 2fl17 (0:9901. Colorado Secretary of State Be it Enacted by the People ofthe State ofcolorado:

activist handbook to

APPORTIONMENT Statement of Position As announced by the State Board, 1966

AN AMENDMENT TO ESTABLISH THE ARKANSAS CITIZENS' REDISTRICTING COMMISSION

The 2020 Census, Gerrymandering, and Voter Suppression

Illinois Redistricting Collaborative Talking Points Feb. Update

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2005 H 1 HOUSE BILL 1448

activists handbook to

Redistricting Matters

ILLINOIS (status quo)

Where Do You Draw the Line?

Local Opportunities for Redistricting Reform

ILLINOIS (status quo)

100TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY State of Illinois 2017 and 2018

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 S 1 SENATE BILL 702. Short Title: Independent Redistricting Commission. (Public)

Testimony of FairVote The Center for Voting and Democracy Jack Santucci, Program for Representative Government. October 16, 2006

Nonpartisan Services for Colorado's Legislature. Date: Bill Status: Fiscal Analyst: The fiscal note reflects the introduced resolution.

ST. TAMMANY PARISH SCHOOL BOARD 2010 CENSUS/2014 ELECTION REDISTRICTING DECEMBER 1, Presentation by REDISTRICTING L.L.C.

(132nd General Assembly) (Substitute Senate Joint Resolution Number 5) A JOINT RESOLUTION

CALIFORNIA S VOTERS FIRST ACT. CALIFORNIA STATE AUDITOR Elaine M. Howle Presented by Sharon Reilly Chief Counsel

Congressional and Legislative Appointments

CITIZEN ADVOCACY CENTER

Cooper v. Harris, 581 U.S. (2017).

Redistricting in Michigan

Gerrymandering: t he serpentine art VCW State & Local

Redistricting: Nuts & Bolts. By Kimball Brace Election Data Services, Inc.

Chapter 6 Congress 9/28/2015. Roots of the U.S. Congress 6.1. Bicameral legislature. TABLE 6.1 What are the powers of Congress? 6.

Nonpartisan Services for Colorado's Legislature. Date: Bill Status: Fiscal Analyst: The fiscal note reflects the introduced resolution.

Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Electoral Districts

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL

RESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. July 26, 2016

GIS in Redistricting Jack Dohrman, GIS Analyst Nebraska Legislature Legislative Research Office

Implementing Trustee Area Elections: Procedural & Substantive Considerations

CITY OF SACRAMENTO MEASURE L

Illinois Redistricting Collaborative 2018 Gubernatorial Gerrymandering Survey

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL

INITIATIVE PETITION AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION

Chapter 5 - The Organization of Congress

In the constitution of the state of Colorado, add section 43.5 to article V as. Congressional and Legislative Appointments

RE-DRAWING LINES: A Public Interest Analysis of California s 2006 Redistricting Reform Proposals

In the constitution of the state of Colorado, add section 43.5 to article V as. Congressional and Legislative Appointments

VOTERS FIRST THE PROMISE OF CITIZEN-LED REDISTRICTING IN NASSAU COUNTY

Census Bureau ships North Carolina's local census data to the governor and legislative leaders.

Gerry Hebert, Executive Director Campaign Legal Center Washington, DC. The 31st COGEL Annual Conference December 6-9, 2009 Scottsdale, AZ

Partisan Advantage and Competitiveness in Illinois Redistricting

Partisan Gerrymandering

Redistricting in Louisiana Past & Present. Regional Educational Presentation Baton Rouge December 15, 2009

Partisan Gerrymandering

IUSD ELECTORAL PROCESS UNDER CONSIDERATION. March 27, 2018

16 Ohio U.S. Congressional Districts: What s wrong with this picture?

Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Districts

Making Government Work For The People Again

Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Electoral Districts

Redistricting 101 Why Redistrict?

March 1 Census Bureau ships North Carolina's local census data to the governor and legislative leaders. June 17 Republicans release redistricting

CALIFORNIA INITIATIVE REVIEW

NEW YORK STATE SENATE PUBLIC MEETING ON REDISTRICTING DECEMBER 14, 2010

H 7749 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Testimony of Natasha M. Korgaonkar Assistant Counsel, Political Participation Group NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Redistricting in Louisiana Past & Present. Regional Educational Presentation Monroe February 2, 2010

City of Oakland 2013 Redistricting Town Hall forum

Objectives. 1. Warm-Up. 2. National/State Legislatures Worksheet. 3. Congressional Membership Notes. 4. Video Clip US Congress. 5.

Guide to 2011 Redistricting

Reading Between the Lines Congressional and State Legislative Redistricting

Sully District Fairfax County. Prepared by Ralph Hubbard Sully Supervisor Representative Fairfax County Redistricting Committee 3/23/2011

El Monte Union High School District Introduction to the California Voting Rights Act & Districting

City of Mesquite Districting City Council Districts. Presented By: Gunnar Seaquist Partner, Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

Assessing California s Redistricting Commission

Redistricting Reform in the South

Case 3:13-cv REP-LO-AD Document 222 Filed 09/17/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 5133

Leaders Guide to LWVUS Program Planning

GOVERNMENT INTEGRITY 14

Redistricting in Virginia: the Current Scene

Claremont McKenna College April 21, 2010 Douglas Johnson Ian Johnson David Meyer

Supreme Court of Florida

AP UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS 2008 SCORING GUIDELINES

Initiatives on the Nov. 6 Ballot. Amendment 1: Legislative Reforms Prop B: Minimum Wage Medical Marijuana - 3 Gasoline Tax Bingo

Paul Smith, Attorney at Law Jenner and Block Washington, DC. Gerry Hebert, Attorney at Law Washington, DC

2009 Election Uniformity Workshop

Campaigns and Elections

2. Identify the factors of political socialization. Rank them from #1 (most important) to #5 (least important). Then, explain your ranking.

CITIZEN ADVOCACY CENTER. Congressional Redistricting What is redistricting and why does it matter? A Moderated Discussion

Mississippi House of Representatives Weekly Summary

Redistricting, Democracy, and New York: A Practical Solution

JANUARY 5, 2108 FINAL

Transcription:

Citizens Union and the League of Women Voters of New York State 10 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on the Proposed Constitutional Amendment to Reform Redistricting 1. What will the proposed constitutional amendment accomplish? In summary, the constitutional amendment replaces the Legislative Task Force for Demographic Research and Reapportionment (LATFOR), which had drawn lines during the past four redistricting cycles and was controlled by the majorities in each house, with an independent commission. The independent commission s appointees are evenly divided between majority and minority parties. For the first time ever, unaffiliated or third party members will also be included in the redistricting process. There will be two co-executive directors selected by a majority vote of the commission with the rest of the staff being hired by the directors, marking the first time the staff is not hired by the majorities. The amendment also codifies for the first time in the state constitution additional important criteria for drawing lines. The principles of the federal Voting Rights Act (VRA), which are increasingly facing threat of retrogression in the courts and Congress, are added to the state constitution, preserving the rights of language and racial minorities. Lines would be prohibited from being drawn to favor or disfavor incumbents, political parties or candidates. Communities of interest are recognized for the first time as a criterion for drawing lines. The voting procedures and thresholds for passage of a redistricting plan by the independent commission and the legislature varies depending on which parties control each house of the legislature. Supermajority votes are established to prevent dominance by one political party or majority parties in both the commission and the legislature for approval of district lines. The proposed amendment breaks new ground in transparency by requiring software, data and maps to be provided to the public, allowing for independent analysis and the creation of maps by the public. It also establishes firm deadlines for the different stages of the redistricting process to ensure that lines are established in a timely manner and delays in drawing maps do not disadvantage challengers running against state legislative or congressional incumbents. These important changes would be made permanent through the passage of a constitutional amendment. The proposed amendment is accompanied by a statute that places an additional constraint on the legislature s ability to amend the lines proposed by the commission. 1

Citizens Union and the League of Women Voters of New York State Page 2 2. How will the ten-member independent commission ( the Commission ) be appointed? Each of the four legislative leaders will appoint two members, and two additional members will be appointed by a vote of not less than five of the original eight members. These two additional members will not have been enrolled in either of the two major political parties in the preceding five years. For the first time, the redistricting process will include equal representation among the four legislative leaders and appointees not of the Republican and Democratic parties. LATFOR is comprised of six members, with two each from the majority parties in each house with only one each from the minority party, effectively giving the majority parties full control of the process, ignoring the views of the minority parties. 3. Who will be able to serve? Rules prohibit those with conflicts of interest from serving on the Commission including no person who has served in the last three years as a New York legislator, statewide elected official, member of congress, and spouses of the preceding groups, legislators staff, lobbyists, state officers, state employees, or party chairs. To the extent practicable, the appointments will reflect the diversity of the state and result from consultation with outside groups. Four of the six members of LATFOR are legislators. 4. How will the Commission approve a redistricting plan? Will an even-numbered Commission create gridlock? A supermajority vote seven out of ten votes by the Commission will be required to send a redistricting plan to the legislature, which can be passed by majority vote of the legislature, encouraging collaboration and cooperation. If control of the legislature is split between the two major parties, the plan will have to have at least one vote from each of the two major party appointees. If the legislature is controlled by one party, those seven votes will have to include at least one vote from the appointments of each of the four legislative leaders to ensure that there is no major party dominance. If no plan gets seven votes, the plan with the highest number of votes will go to the legislature, but approval of such a plan will require at least 60 percent approval in the legislature. The members of LATFOR appointed by the majority four of the six control the process and draw the lines with little to no input from the appointees representing the minority parties. Those lines are then provided to the legislature and passed by the majority party controlling each house.

Citizens Union and the League of Women Voters of New York State Page 3 5. What additional voting procedures will ensure inclusion of the party out of power in case one party controls both chambers? In order to protect against one-party dominance in the drawing of lines, if one party controls both houses of the legislature, approval of a plan will require a 2/3 affirmative vote in each house. A simple majority is required for any district plan provided by LATFOR. Consequently the majority parties in each house completely control redistricting from drawing the lines to passing them. 6. What criteria must be considered by the Commission? In addition to requiring contiguous and compact districts, and districts as nearly as maybe equal in size to the extent practicable, for the first time the state constitution will include criteria that requires: that districts shall not be drawn to discourage competition or for the purpose of favoring or disfavoring incumbents, particular candidates or political parties; consideration of communities of interest in drawing district lines; protections for racial and language minority groups in the drawing of district lines consistent with the Voting Rights Act, ensuring those protections remain regardless of what happens at the federal level; and an explanation by the Commission if the legislative districts are not equal in population. LATFOR must first follow federal law which requires adherence to the Voting Rights Act and the creation of state legislative districts whose populations are within 5 percent of the average size district. The constitution also requires that districts be contiguous and, as is practicable, compact, and provides that counties and towns cannot be divided under certain circumstances. There are currently no prohibitions in the state constitution that prevent lines from being drawn to discourage competition or for the purpose of favoring or disfavoring incumbents, particular candidates or political parties, an important safeguard against the current practice of regional gerrymandering. Nor are there provisions that require communities of interest to be considered as a criterion for drawing lines. 7. Will the legislature get to draw the lines if it votes down the Commission s plan?

Citizens Union and the League of Women Voters of New York State Page 4 The legislature will only be able to amend the lines if the Commission s plan(s) fail to achieve legislative approval after two up or down votes without amendments, but the legislature is restricted to changes that adhere to the criteria in the constitutional amendment. An accompanying statute further restricts the legislature from making changes that affect not more than two percent of the population of any district. There are no restrictions on their ability of the legislature to amend the plan, which is essentially guaranteed passage, as the majorities of the legislature control LATFOR. 8. What process will there be for public input? The amendment will require 12 hearings across the state ensuring public input in line-drawing. It will also require the provision of maps and data to the public in a form that allows for independent analysis and the development of alternate redistricting plans. There are no requirements for hearings, although LATFOR has held them voluntarily. There are no requirements for maps and data to be provided to the public, although LATFOR has provided maps and some data but not done so in a form that is easily accessible by the public or facilitates development of alternate plans. LATFOR has not made software for drawing maps available to the public. 9. Why has there not more been public input on the constitutional amendment? Various proposals have been introduced in the legislature through the years and have been the subject of input by the public, including good government groups and civil rights groups. Redistricting has been the subject of hearings in both the Assembly and Senate for the past several years, and the issue has been covered extensively in the media. Constitutional amendments must be voted on twice by two successively elected legislatures, and then passed at the ballot box, providing for more review and giving the public an opportunity for participation in this reform. The degree to which hearings are held on bills varies. The constitutional amendment, which was passed in 2012 and 2013 by the legislature, has had more time for review than a typical bill, and the voters will also get to decide in 2014 at the ballot box. 10. If this constitutional amendment is passed, how would New York rank among the 50 states in how it conducts redistricting? We believe that this will put New York in the forefront of redistricting reform, particularly among states that cannot achieve reform through publicly initiated referenda. Most states leave

Citizens Union and the League of Women Voters of New York State Page 5 redistricting completely in the hands of the legislature. Even in Iowa, which has been a model for independent redistricting, the legislature has final approval of the lines. In the majority of states, the legislators directly draw the lines. New York has an advisory body, LATFOR, an entity that exists in law to advise the legislature on line-drawing. Because four of six of its members are legislators it is essentially legislators drawing their own lines. Consequently, New York is not even close to being a leader in independent redistricting.