Citizens Union and the League of Women Voters of New York State

Similar documents
Citizens Union and the League of Women Voters of New York State

Michigan Redistricting Ballot Proposal (VNP)

CITIZENS REDISTRICTING COMMISSION PROPOSAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Background Information on Redistricting

WHERE WE STAND.. ON REDISTRICTING REFORM

REDISTRICTING REDISTRICTING 50 STATE GUIDE TO 50 STATE GUIDE TO HOUSE SEATS SEATS SENATE SEATS SEATS WHO DRAWS THE DISTRICTS?

Summary of the Fair Congressional Districts for Ohio Initiative Proposal

VNP Policy Overview. Davia Downey, Ph.D Grand Valley State University

TX RACIAL GERRYMANDERING

Redrawing the Map: Redistricting Issues in Michigan. Jordon Newton Research Associate Citizens Research Council of Michigan

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2005 H 1 HOUSE BILL 1448

Colorado Secretary of State Toni Larson League of Women Voters of Colorado 1410 Grant, Suite B204, Denver, Co Toni.Larsongmail.

3 2fl17 (0:9901. Colorado Secretary of State Be it Enacted by the People ofthe State ofcolorado:

Putting an end to Gerrymandering in Ohio: A new citizens initiative

AN AMENDMENT TO ESTABLISH THE ARKANSAS CITIZENS' REDISTRICTING COMMISSION

New York Redistricting Memo Analysis

APPORTIONMENT Statement of Position As announced by the State Board, 1966

The Very Picture of What s Wrong in D.C. : Daniel Webster and the American Community Survey

100TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY State of Illinois 2017 and 2018

activist handbook to

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 S 1 SENATE BILL 702. Short Title: Independent Redistricting Commission. (Public)

activists handbook to

Nonpartisan Services for Colorado's Legislature. Date: Bill Status: Fiscal Analyst: The fiscal note reflects the introduced resolution.

ILLINOIS (status quo)

(132nd General Assembly) (Substitute Senate Joint Resolution Number 5) A JOINT RESOLUTION

ILLINOIS (status quo)

Redistricting Matters

Where Do You Draw the Line?

Local Opportunities for Redistricting Reform

Illinois Redistricting Collaborative Talking Points Feb. Update

CALIFORNIA S VOTERS FIRST ACT. CALIFORNIA STATE AUDITOR Elaine M. Howle Presented by Sharon Reilly Chief Counsel

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL

Congressional and Legislative Appointments

CITIZEN ADVOCACY CENTER

ST. TAMMANY PARISH SCHOOL BOARD 2010 CENSUS/2014 ELECTION REDISTRICTING DECEMBER 1, Presentation by REDISTRICTING L.L.C.

Redistricting in Michigan

Nonpartisan Services for Colorado's Legislature. Date: Bill Status: Fiscal Analyst: The fiscal note reflects the introduced resolution.

Gerrymandering: t he serpentine art VCW State & Local

H 7749 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Testimony of FairVote The Center for Voting and Democracy Jack Santucci, Program for Representative Government. October 16, 2006

CITY OF SACRAMENTO MEASURE L

INITIATIVE PETITION AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION

The 2020 Census, Gerrymandering, and Voter Suppression

GIS in Redistricting Jack Dohrman, GIS Analyst Nebraska Legislature Legislative Research Office

JANUARY 5, 2108 FINAL

In the constitution of the state of Colorado, add section 43.5 to article V as. Congressional and Legislative Appointments

Redistricting: Nuts & Bolts. By Kimball Brace Election Data Services, Inc.

RESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. July 26, 2016

In the constitution of the state of Colorado, add section 43.5 to article V as. Congressional and Legislative Appointments

Illinois Redistricting Collaborative 2018 Gubernatorial Gerrymandering Survey

Census Bureau ships North Carolina's local census data to the governor and legislative leaders.

IUSD ELECTORAL PROCESS UNDER CONSIDERATION. March 27, 2018

RE-DRAWING LINES: A Public Interest Analysis of California s 2006 Redistricting Reform Proposals

Implementing Trustee Area Elections: Procedural & Substantive Considerations

Making Government Work For The People Again

Cooper v. Harris, 581 U.S. (2017).

Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Electoral Districts

March 1 Census Bureau ships North Carolina's local census data to the governor and legislative leaders. June 17 Republicans release redistricting

Guide to 2011 Redistricting

Chapter 6 Congress 9/28/2015. Roots of the U.S. Congress 6.1. Bicameral legislature. TABLE 6.1 What are the powers of Congress? 6.

Sully District Fairfax County. Prepared by Ralph Hubbard Sully Supervisor Representative Fairfax County Redistricting Committee 3/23/2011

City of Mesquite Districting City Council Districts. Presented By: Gunnar Seaquist Partner, Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP

Partisan Advantage and Competitiveness in Illinois Redistricting

Case 3:13-cv REP-LO-AD Document 222 Filed 09/17/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 5133

As Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session S. J. R. No A J O I N T R E S O L U T I O N

Gerry Hebert, Executive Director Campaign Legal Center Washington, DC. The 31st COGEL Annual Conference December 6-9, 2009 Scottsdale, AZ

The Electoral College

New Hampshire Tax Collectors Association 2017 Annual Conference GLOSSARY OF TERMS

What do the letters and numbers on my ballot mean?

VOTERS FIRST THE PROMISE OF CITIZEN-LED REDISTRICTING IN NASSAU COUNTY

Partisan Gerrymandering

Partisan Gerrymandering

Chapter 5 - The Organization of Congress

CALIFORNIA INITIATIVE REVIEW

2009 Election Uniformity Workshop

Redistricting in Virginia: the Current Scene

Mississippi House of Representatives Weekly Summary

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL

Reading Between the Lines Congressional and State Legislative Redistricting

Cuomo/Silver/Skelos Redistricting Constitutional Amendment

Committee on Redistricting January 18, 2011

University at Buffalo Law School. Congressional Redistricting Team Presentation

Supreme Court of the United States

Primary Election Systems. An LWVO Study

2. Identify the factors of political socialization. Rank them from #1 (most important) to #5 (least important). Then, explain your ranking.

TOP TWO PRIMARY By Harry Kresky, openprimaries.org INTRODUCTION

Redistricting in Louisiana Past & Present. Regional Educational Presentation Baton Rouge December 15, 2009

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL INTRODUCED BY COSTA, FONTANA, STREET, BOSCOLA AND BREWSTER, JUNE 15, 2017 AN ACT

Claremont McKenna College April 21, 2010 Douglas Johnson Ian Johnson David Meyer

Submitted by: ASSEMBLY MEMBERS HALL, TRAIN!

16 Ohio U.S. Congressional Districts: What s wrong with this picture?

2016 CO 55. Nos. 16SA153, 16SA154, In re Title, Ballot Title & Submission Clause for #132 and #133 Single Subject.

Supreme Court of Florida

Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Electoral Districts

City of Oakland 2013 Redistricting Town Hall forum

H.B. 69 Feb 13, 2019 HOUSE PRINCIPAL CLERK

LWVNE NEBRASKA REDISTRICTING STUDY

Florida's Future State and County Policies: 2010 Elections Will Be Significant in Future Policy Choices 1

The Journey From Census To The United States Supreme Court Linda J. Shorey

Transcription:

Citizens Union and the League of Women Voters of New York State Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on the Proposed Constitutional Amendment to Reform Redistricting 1. What does the proposed constitutional amendment accomplish? In summary, it would replace the current Legislative Task Force for Demographic Research and Reapportionment (LATFOR) redistricting process with an independent commission whose appointees are evenly divided between majority and minority parties. For the first time ever, unaffiliated or third party members would be included in the redistricting process. There will be two co executive directors selected by a majority vote of the commission with the rest of the staff being hired by the directors, marking the first time the staff is not hired by the majorities. The amendment also codifies for the first time in the state constitution additional important criteria for drawing lines. The principles of the federal Voting Rights Act (VRA), which are increasingly facing threat of retrogression in the courts and Congress, are added to the state constitution, preserving the rights of language and racial minorities. Lines would be prohibited from being drawn to favor or disfavor incumbents, political parties or candidates. Communities of interest are recognized for the first time as a criterion for drawing lines. The voting procedures and thresholds for passage of a redistricting plan by the independent commission and the legislature varies depending on which parties control each house of the legislature. Supermajority votes are established to prevent dominance by one political party or majority parties in both the commission and the legislature for approval of district lines. The proposed amendment breaks new ground in transparency by requiring software, data and maps to be provided to the public, allowing for independent analysis and the creation of maps by the public. It also establishes firm deadlines for the different stages of the redistricting process to ensure that lines are established in a timely manner and delays in drawing maps do not disadvantage challengers running against state legislative or congressional incumbents. These important changes would be made permanent through the passage of a constitutional amendment. The proposed amendment will be accompanied by a statute which will provide insurance against the amendment not achieving second passage and place an additional constraint on the legislature s ability to amend the lines proposed by the commission. 1

Citizens Union and the League of Women Voters of New York State Page 2 1. How is the ten member independent commission ( the Commission ) appointed? Each of the four legislative leaders appoints two members, and two additional members are appointed by a vote of not less than five of the original eight members. These two additional members must not have been enrolled in either of the two major political parties in the preceding five years. For the first time, the redistricting process includes equal representation among the four legislative leaders and appointees not of the Republican and Democratic parties. LATFOR is comprised of six members, with two each from the majority parties in each house with only one each from the minority party, effectively giving the majority parties full control of the process, ignoring the views of the minority parties. 2. Who can serve? Rules prohibit those with conflicts of interest from serving on the Commission including no person who has served in the last three years as a New York legislator, statewide elected official, member of congress, and spouses of the preceding groups, legislators staff, lobbyists, state officers, state employees, or party chairs. To the extent practicable, the appointments should reflect the diversity of the state and result from consultation with outside groups. Four of the six members of LATFOR are legislators. 3. How does the Commission approve a redistricting plan? Will an even numbered Commission create gridlock? A supermajority vote seven out of ten votes by the Commission is required to send a redistricting plan to the legislature, which can be passed by majority vote of the legislature, encouraging collaboration and cooperation. If control of the legislature is split between the two major parties, the plan must have at least one vote from each of the two major party appointees. If the legislature is controlled by one party, those seven votes must include at least one vote from the appointments of each of the four legislative leaders to ensure that there is no major party dominance. If no plan gets seven votes, the plan with the highest number of votes goes to the legislature, but approval of such a plan requires at least 60 percent approval in the legislature. The members of LATFOR appointed by the majority four of the six control the process and draw the lines with little to no input from the appointees representing the minority parties. Those lines are then provided to the legislature and passed by the majority party controlling each house.

Citizens Union and the League of Women Voters of New York State Page 3 4. What additional voting procedures ensure inclusion of the party out of power in case one party controls both chambers? In order to protect against one party dominance in the drawing of lines, if one party controls both houses of the legislature, approval of a plan requires a 2/3 affirmative vote in each house. A simple majority is required for any district plan provided by LATFOR. Consequently the majority parties in each house completely control redistricting from drawing the lines to passing them. 5. What criteria must be considered by the Commission? In addition to requiring contiguous and compact districts, and nearly as maybe equal in size districts to the extent practicable, for the first time the state constitution will include criteria that require: that districts shall not be drawn to discourage competition or for the purpose of favoring or disfavoring incumbents, particular candidates or political parties; consideration of communities of interest in drawing district lines; protections for racial and language minority groups in the drawing of district lines consistent with the Voting Rights Act, ensuring those protections remain regardless of what happens at the federal level; and an explanation by the Commission if the legislative districts are not equal in population. LATFOR must first follow federal law which requires adherence to the Voting Rights Act and the creation of state legislative districts whose populations are within 5 percent of the average size district. The constitution also requires that districts be contiguous and, as is practicable, compact, and provides that counties and towns cannot be divided under certain circumstances. There are currently no prohibitions in the state constitution that prevent lines from being drawn to discourage competition or for the purpose of favoring or disfavoring incumbents, particular candidates or political parties. Nor are there provisions that require communities of interest to be considered as a criterion for drawing lines.

Citizens Union and the League of Women Voters of New York State Page 4 6. Does the legislature get to draw the lines if it votes down the Commission s plan? The legislature can only amend the lines if the Commission s plan(s) fail to achieve legislative approval after two up or down votes without amendments, but the legislature is restricted to changes that adhere to the criteria in the constitutional amendment. An accompanying statute will further restrict the legislature to making changes that affect not more than two percent of the population of any district. There are no restrictions on their ability of the legislature to amend the plan, which is essentially guaranteed passage, as the majorities of the legislature control LATFOR. 7. What process is there for public input? The amendment requires 12 hearings across the state ensuring public input in line drawing. It also requires the provision of maps and data to the public in a form that allows for independent analysis and the development of alternate redistricting plans. There are no requirements for hearings, although LATFOR has held them voluntarily. There are no requirements for maps and data to be provided to the public, although LATFOR has provided maps and some data but not done so in a form that is easily accessible by the public or facilitates development of alternate plans. LATFOR has not made software for drawing maps available to the public. 8. Why has there not more been public input on the constitutional amendment? Various proposals have been introduced in the legislature through the years and have been the subject of input by the public, including good government groups and civil rights groups. Redistricting has been the subject of hearings in both the Assembly and Senate for the past several years, and the issue has been covered extensively in the media. Constitutional amendments must be voted on twice by two successively elected legislatures, and then passed at the ballot box, providing for more review and giving the public an opportunity for participation in this reform. The degree to which hearings are held on bills varies. The constitutional amendment, because it requires a vote by a second legislature in 2013, will have much more time for review than a typical bill.

Citizens Union and the League of Women Voters of New York State Page 5 9. What assurance is there that the amendment will be passed again in the next legislative session? Citizens Union and the League, as well as the Governor, have conditioned support of the constitutional amendment on passage of an accompanying statute that will put in place a statutory version of the amendment if it does not achieve second passage. This statute would also contain a restriction on legislative amendments to the lines on third passage, allowing no more than two percent of the population of districts proposed by the Commission to be changed, which will go into effect regardless of whether the legislature passes the amendment twice. Not applicable. 10. If this constitutional amendment is passed, how would New York rank among the 50 states in how it conducts redistricting? We believe that this will put New York in the forefront of redistricting reform, particularly among states that cannot achieve reform through publicly initiated referenda. Most states leave redistricting completely in the hands of the legislature. Even in Iowa, which has been a model for independent redistricting, the legislature has final approval of the lines. In the majority of states, the legislators directly draw the lines. New York has an advisory body, LATFOR, an entity that exists in law to advise the legislature on line drawing. Because four of six of its members are legislators it is essentially legislators drawing their own lines. Consequently, New York is not even close to being a leader in independent redistricting.