Pending Mul+district Li+ga+on

Similar documents
STATE PRESCRIPTION MONITORING STATUTES AND REGULATIONS LIST

APPENDIX STATE BANS ON DEBTORS PRISONS AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE DEBT

Elder Financial Abuse and State Mandatory Reporting Laws for Financial Institutions Prepared by CUNA s State Government Affairs

Statutes of Limitations for the 50 States (and the District of Columbia)

Laws Governing Data Security and Privacy U.S. Jurisdictions at a Glance UPDATED MARCH 30, 2015

Section 4. Table of State Court Authorities Governing Judicial Adjuncts and Comparison Between State Rules and Fed. R. Civ. P. 53

States Adopt Emancipation Day Deadline for Individual Returns; Some Opt Against Allowing Delay for Corporate Returns in 2012

STATUTES OF REPOSE. Presented by 2-10 Home Buyers Warranty on behalf of the National Association of Home Builders.

Survey of State Laws on Credit Unions Incidental Powers

Accountability-Sanctions

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

APPENDIX D STATE PERPETUITIES STATUTES

APPENDIX C STATE UNIFORM TRUST CODE STATUTES

States Permitting Or Prohibiting Mutual July respondent in the same action.

EXCEPTIONS: WHAT IS ADMISSIBLE?

Name Change Laws. Current as of February 23, 2017

State Prescription Monitoring Program Statutes and Regulations List

Laws Governing Data Security and Privacy U.S. Jurisdictions at a Glance

CA CALIFORNIA. Ala. Code 10-2B (2009) [Transferred, effective January 1, 2011, to 10A ] No monetary penalties listed.

Survey of State Civil Shoplifting Statutes

State Statutory Provisions Addressing Mutual Protection Orders

Relationship Between Adult and Minor Guardianship Statutes

50 State Survey of Bad Faith Law. Does your State encourage bad faith?

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

State By State Survey:

Chapter 10: Introduction to Citation Form

H.R and the Protection of State Conscience Rights for Pro-Life Healthcare Workers. November 4, 2009 * * * * *

State P3 Legislation Matrix 1

Background. Hon. Joseph L. Slights III, New Castle County Courthouse, Wilmington, DE

According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, guilty pleas in 1996 accounted for 91

State-by-State Lien Matrix

Teacher Tenure: Teacher Due Process Rights to Continued Employment

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

If it hasn t happened already, at some point

National State Law Survey: Mistake of Age Defense 1

You are working on the discovery plan for

Governance State Boards/Chiefs/Agencies

A MODEL DECERTIFICATION LAW ROGER L. GOLDMAN*

Time Off To Vote State-by-State

Chart #5 Consideration of Criminal Record in Licensing and Employment CHART #5 CONSIDERATION OF CRIMINAL RECORD IN LICENSING AND EMPLOYMENT

Making a Difference In Washington, D.C.

THE SECTION 365(C)(1)(A) DEBATE: ACTUAL OR HYPOTHETICAL? A CIRCUIT-BY-CIRCUIT LOOK ROBERT L. EISENBACH III* COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP

Right to Try: It s More Complicated Than You Think

ANIMAL CRUELTY STATE LAW SUMMARY CHART: Court-Ordered Programs for Animal Cruelty Offenses

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STATE VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT LAWS AND WHETHER DEFENDANT HAS RIGHT OF CROSS- EXAMINATION WITH RESPECT TO VICTIM IMPACT EVIDENCE

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION TRANSFER ORDER

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT FOR MEMBERS OF THE FLSA SETTLEMENT CLASS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Memorandum Supporting Model Constitutional or Statutory Provision for Supervision of Judges of Political Subdivision Courts

REPORTS AND REFERRALS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT: PROVISIONS AND CITATIONS IN ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES LAWS, BY STATE

State Statutory Authority for Restoration of Rights in Termination of Adult Guardianship

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

The Role of State Attorneys General in Federal and State Redistricting in 2020

2018 Midterm Elections: Battle for House, Senate

Interstate Deposition Statutes: Survey and Analysis

Page 1 of 5. Appendix A.

A Survey of Federal District Court Opinions: West Publishing Company Reports

State Data Breach Laws

Authorizing Automated Vehicle Platooning

STATE STANDARDS FOR EMERGENCY EVALUATION

LAST WORDS ON THE APPORTIONMENT PROBLEM

In The Supreme Court of the United States

Volume Index - Table of Statutes

IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA

STATE LAW SURVEY FOR USE IN APPLYING THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR MINOR SECTION OF THE HIPAA PRIVACY RULE, 45 CFR (g)(3)

Nos , IN THE Supreme Court of the United States. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, ET AL., Petitioners, v.

FEBRUARY 2019 OPPORTUNITY OHIO LUCKY OR GOOD? An Analysis of John Kasich s Tenure as Ohio's Governor. by MATT A. MAYER

Stand Your Ground Laws: Mischaracterized, Misconstrued, and Misunderstood

JURISDICTIONS COMPARATIVE CHART

THE 2010 AMENDMENTS TO UCC ARTICLE 9

Electronic Notarization

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Immigrant Caregivers:

Supreme Court of the United States

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Incorporation CHAPTER 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. No. MDL PHX DGC. IN RE: Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation,

To deter violent, abusive, and intimidating acts against victims, both civil and criminal

National State Law Survey: Expungement and Vacatur Laws 1

Individual Chapter 11s: Pitfalls and Advantages

Many crime victims are awarded restitution at the sentencing of an offender but

Product Counterfeiting Legislation in the United States: A Review and Assessment of Characteristics, Remedies, and Penalties

A Blatant Inequity: Contributions to the Common Benefit Fund in Multidistrict Litigation

Restitution and Asset Forfeiture: A Focus on Human Trafficking Current as of April 2014

Multidistrict Litigation, Forum Selection and Transfer: Tips and Trends Julie M. Holloway Partner, Latham & Watkins LLP

Statutory Limitations on Civil Rights of People with Criminal Records

Case: 3:13-cv bbc Document #: 48 Filed: 11/14/13 Page 1 of 9

RUTGERS LAW RECORD The Internet Journal of Rutgers School of Law Newark

*** CAPITAL CASE *** No

12/10/ Election Results: What Happened and What It All Means for Immigration. About the National Immigration Forum

Executive Parity: How the Structure of Executive Branches at the City, State, and Federal Level Impacts Presidents and Presidential Candidates.

Confirming an Arbitration Award

THE ROLE OF THE CRIME AT JUVENILE PAROLE HEARINGS: A RESPONSE TO BETH CALDWELL S CREATING MEANINGFUL OPPORTUNITIES FOR RELEASE

An Agricultural Law Research Article. State Animal Anti-Cruelty Statutes: An Overview

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Inspection of Grand Jury Minutes by Criminal Defendants

Criminal Law - Requiring Citizens to Aid a Peace Officer

Case 7:13-cv RDP Document 5 Filed 07/03/13 Page 1 of 10

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

CRS Report for Congress

Capital Crimes As Defined in American Statutory Law

Transcription:

Pending Mul+district Li+ga+on Distribution of Pending MDLs By Type as of 7/15/2015 As of July 7 th, 2015, there were 287 named MDL pending in various courts Contract, 12, 4% Securi*es, 26, 9% Sales Prac*ces, 36, 13% Air Disaster, 3, 1% Nearly half (47%) of all pending MDL is made up by product liability and anhtrust suits Products Liability, 69, 24% An*trust, 65, 23% Employment Prac*ces, 7, 2% Common Disasters, 2, 1% Intellectual Property, 18, 6% Miscellaenous, 49, 17% Data Courtesy of Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Pending Mul+district Li+ga+on Despite making up only 24% of all pending, named MDLs, products liability makes up 92% of all pending MDL achons AnHtrust achons make up 23% of pending, named MDLs, but only ~1% of pending achons The majority of achons in the common disasters category (2%) come from lihgahon resulhng from the BP Oil spill (In re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig "Deepwater Horizon" in the Gulf of Mexico, on April 20, 2010) Products Liability, 120215, 92% Distribution of Pending MDL Actions By Type as of 7/15/2015 Contract, 107, 0% Securi*es, 305, 0% Sales Prac*ces, 858, 1% Employment Prac*ces, 32, 0% Air Disaster, 40, 0% An*trust, 1595, 1% Common Disasters, 2967, 2% Miscellaenous, 5292, 4% Intellectual Property, 158, 0% Data Courtesy of Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Number of Pending MDLs by District Court 40 35 30 Number of MDLs 25 20 15 10 5 0 N.D. Ala. E.D. Ark. D. Ariz. C.D. Cal. N.D. Cal. S.D. Cal. D. Colo. D. Conn. D.D.C. D. Del. M.D. Fla. S.D. Fla. M.D. Ga. N.D. Ga. D. Idaho C.D. Ill. N.D. Ill. S.D. Ill. N.D. Ind. S.D. Ind. D. Kan. E.D. Ky. W.D. Ky. E.D. La. W.D. La. D. Mass. D. Md. D. Me. E.D. Mich. D. Minn. E.D. Mo. W.D. Mo. W.D.N.C. D.N.H. D.N.J. D. Nev. E.D.N.Y. S.D.N.Y. N.D. Ohio S.D. Ohio W.D. Okla. D. Or. E.D. Pa. M.D. Pa. W.D. Pa. D.R.I. D.S.C. E.D. Tenn. W.D. Tenn. E.D. Tex. N.D. Tex. S.D. Tex. W.D. Tex. E.D. Va. E.D. Wash. W.D. Wash. E.D. Wis. N.D.W. Va. S.D.W. Va.

Terminated Mul+district Li+ga+on Total AcHons Subjected to 1407 Proceedings per Year by AcHons Terminated by Transferee Courts per Year For a four- year period between 2009 and 2012, the rate of MDL achons being terminated each year was greater than the rate of new MDL achons being brought each year In 2013, 28,000 more MDL achons were brought than terminated. In 2014, 39,042 more MDL achons were brought Number of MDL AcHons 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Fiscal Year Total AcHons Subjected to 1407 Proceedings AcHons Terminated by Transferee Courts Data Courtesy of Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

MDL AcHons Terminated (CumlaHve 1968-2014) Eleventh Circuit 43973 Tenth Circuit 2278 Ninth Circuit 12583 Eighth Circuit 28290 Seventh Circuit 9693 Sixth Circuit 21901 Fidh Circuit 22263 Fourth Circuit 6351 Third Circuit 221269 Second Circuit 13486 First Circuit 3253 District of Columbia 2550 0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 Number of MDL AcHons Data Courtesy of Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

MDL Ac+ons Terminated Between 1/1/2015 and 7/15/2015 Intellectual Property, 2 Contract, 1 Products Liability, 5 Between January 1 st, 2015 and July 15 th, 2015, 22 named MDLs have been terminated The average length of each MDL terminated between 1/1/2015 and 7/15/2015 from filing to terminahon is 6.07 years Miscellaneous, 6 Sales Prac*ces, 2 The longest MDL (In re Reciprocal of America (ROA) Sales PracHces LiHgaHon) lasted 12 years, 1 month and 15 days. The shortest (In re TLI CommunicaHons LLC Patent LiHgaHon) lasted 11 months and 13 days. Securi*es, 6

MDL SeAlement Rates Between 2000 and March 2015 MDL Category DisposiHve MoHon (%) Segled (%) Air Disaster 20 52-64 AnHtrusts 7 18-52 Contracts 8 30-63 Patent 12 55-71 Sales PracHces 6 66-88 SecuriHes 28 15-48 Products Liabilty - - Asbestos 0 85-87 251,221 MDL case terminahons were found between 2000 and March 2015 97% of terminated cases were personal injury products liability cases, and 69% were Asbestos cases 1% of MDL cases terminated by disposihve mohon and at least 72% of cases were segled Personal Injury 3 43-85 PharmaceuHcal 3 52-88

Sources Memorandum from Emery Lee, Fed. Judicial Ctr, to Samuel Issacharoff, NYU School of Law (June 2, 2015) (on file with recipient). U.S. Judicial Panel on MulHdist. LiHg., MDLS TERMINATED BETWEEN JANUARY 1 ST, 2015 AND JULY 15 TH, 2015 (Jul. 15, 2015), available at hgp://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/pending- mdls- 0. U.S. Judicial Panel on MulHdist. LiHg., PENDING MDLS BY DISTRICT AS OF JULY 15 TH, 2015 (Jul. 15, 2015), available at hgp://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/pending- mdls- 0. U.S. Judicial Panel on MulHdist. LiHg., PENDING MDLS BY DOCKET TYPE AS OF JULY 15 TH, 2015 (Jul. 15, 2015), available at hgp://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/pending- mdls- 0. U.S. Judicial Panel on MulHdist. LiHg., MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION TERMINATED THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2014, available at hgp://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/stahshcs- info. U.S. Judicial Panel on MulHdist. LiHg., STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION FISCAL YEAR 2000 (2000), available at hgp://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/stahshcs- info. U.S. Judicial Panel on MulHdist. LiHg., STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION FISCAL YEAR 2001 (2001), available at hgp://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/stahshcs- info. U.S. Judicial Panel on MulHdist. LiHg., STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION FISCAL YEAR 2002 (2002), available at hgp://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/stahshcs- info. U.S. Judicial Panel on MulHdist. LiHg., STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION FISCAL YEAR 2003 (2003), available at hgp://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/stahshcs- info. U.S. Judicial Panel on MulHdist. LiHg., STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION FISCAL YEAR 2004 (2004), available at hgp://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/stahshcs- info. U.S. Judicial Panel on MulHdist. LiHg., STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION FISCAL YEAR 2005 (2005), available at hgp://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/stahshcs- info. U.S. Judicial Panel on MulHdist. LiHg., STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION FISCAL YEAR 2006 (2006), available at hgp://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/stahshcs- info. U.S. Judicial Panel on MulHdist. LiHg., STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION FISCAL YEAR 2007 (2007), available at hgp://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/stahshcs- info. U.S. Judicial Panel on MulHdist. LiHg., STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION FISCAL YEAR 2008 (2008), available at hgp://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/stahshcs- info. U.S. Judicial Panel on MulHdist. LiHg., STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION FISCAL YEAR 2009 (2009), available at hgp://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/stahshcs- info. U.S. Judicial Panel on MulHdist. LiHg., STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION FISCAL YEAR 2010 (2010), available at hgp://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/stahshcs- info. U.S. Judicial Panel on MulHdist. LiHg., STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION FISCAL YEAR 2011 (2011), available at hgp://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/stahshcs- info. U.S. Judicial Panel on MulHdist. LiHg., STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION FISCAL YEAR 2012 (2012), available at hgp://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/stahshcs- info. U.S. Judicial Panel on MulHdist. LiHg., STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION FISCAL YEAR 2013 (2013), available at hgp://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/stahshcs- info. U.S. Judicial Panel on MulHdist. LiHg., STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION FISCAL YEAR 2014 (2014), available at hgp://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/stahshcs- info.