CASE OF POLAND. Outline

Similar documents
Between brain drain and brain gain post-2004 Polish migration experience

in an emigration-immigration country -

Selectivity of the recent return migration to Poland

European Integration Consortium. IAB, CMR, frdb, GEP, WIFO, wiiw. Labour mobility within the EU in the context of enlargement and the functioning

Migration, Mobility and Integration in the European Labour Market. Lorenzo Corsini

Migration and Labor Market Outcomes in Sending and Southern Receiving Countries

ISS. Recent Trends in International Migration Poland Ewa Kępińska. Seria: PRACE MIGRACYJNE, nr 52. Grudzień 2003

2nd Ministerial Conference of the Prague Process Action Plan

European Integration Consortium. IAB, CMR, frdb, GEP, WIFO, wiiw. Labour mobility within the EU in the context of enlargement and the functioning

Options for Romanian and Bulgarian migrants in 2014

Migration and the European Job Market Rapporto Europa 2016

Labour mobility within the EU - The impact of enlargement and the functioning. of the transitional arrangements

Migration information Center I Choose Lithuania

European Union Passport

The Application of Quotas in EU Member States as a measure for managing labour migration from third countries

Migration as an Adjustment Mechanism in a Crisis-Stricken Europe

European Integration Consortium. IAB, CMR, frdb, GEP, WIFO, wiiw. Labour mobility within the EU in the context of enlargement and the functioning

Population and Migration Estimates

The Outlook for EU Migration

1 Defined as number of population aged 65 and over expressed as percent of population

ISBN International Migration Outlook Sopemi 2007 Edition OECD Introduction

Migration Challenge or Opportunity? - Introduction. 15th Munich Economic Summit

Labour Force Mobility in Poland - Preliminary Analyses. Mateusz Walewski CASE Center for Social and Economic Research

Factual summary Online public consultation on "Modernising and Simplifying the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP)"

Territorial indicators for policy purposes: NUTS regions and beyond

Highly skilled migration from Poland and other CEE countries myths and reality

KRYSTYNA IGLICKA L.K.Academy of Management, WARSAW. The Impact of Workers from Central and Eastern Europe on Labour markets. The experience of Poland.

Population and Migration Estimates

Migration in employment, social and equal opportunities policies

Europe in Figures - Eurostat Yearbook 2008 The diversity of the EU through statistics

IMMIGRATION IN THE EU

BRIEFING. EU Migration to and from the UK.

The new demographic and social challenges in Spain: the aging process and the immigration

Gender effects of the crisis on labor market in six European countries

EU labour migration during the crisis does increased labour mobility contribute to better labour allocation? Introduction

Labour market integration of low skilled migrants in Europe: Economic impact. Gudrun Biffl

Fertility rate and employment rate: how do they interact to each other?

DETERMINANTS OF INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION: A SURVEY ON TRANSITION ECONOMIES AND TURKEY. Pınar Narin Emirhan 1. Preliminary Draft (ETSG 2008-Warsaw)

International labour migration

Eurostat Yearbook 2006/07 A goldmine of statistical information

European patent filings

The Components of Wage Inequality and the Role of Labour Market Flexibility

September 2012 Euro area unemployment rate at 11.6% EU27 at 10.6%

The Economic and Financial Crisis and Precarious Employment amongst Young People in the European Union

2.2 THE SOCIAL AND DEMOGRAPHIC COMPOSITION OF EMIGRANTS FROM HUNGARY

UWE has obtained warranties from all depositors as to their title in the material deposited and as to their right to deposit such material.

Europe divided? Attitudes to immigration ahead of the 2019 European elections. Dr. Lenka Dražanová

OECD ECONOMIC SURVEY OF LITHUANIA 2018 Promoting inclusive growth

"Migration, Labor Markets and the Economic Integration of Migrants in Western Europe"

INTEGRATION OF IMMIGRANTS INTO THE LABOUR MARKET IN EU AND OECD COUNTRIES

Fafo-Conference One year after Oslo, 26 th of May, Migration, Co-ordination Failures and Eastern Enlargement

The application of quotas in EU Member States as a measure for managing labour migration from third countries

The Foreign-born Population in the EU and its contribution to National Tax and Benefit Systems. Andrew Dabalen World Bank

Labour migration after EU enlargement ESTONIA. Siiri Otsmann Labour Policy Information and Analysis Department Ministry of Social Affairs

Migration Report Central conclusions

Defining migratory status in the context of the 2030 Agenda

INDIA-EU DIALOGUE ON MIGRATION AND MOBILITY

Standard Note: SN/SG/6077 Last updated: 25 April 2014 Author: Oliver Hawkins Section Social and General Statistics

Dynamics of the development of the rate of the entrepreneurship of eastern Poland relating to the country in years

International Migration and the Welfare State. Prof. Panu Poutvaara Ifo Institute and University of Munich

Homogeneity of the European Union from the Point of View of Labour Market. Homogenost Evropske unije sa aspekta tržišta rada

LABOR MIGRATION AND RECOGNITION OF QUALIFICATIONS

The UK and the European Union Insights from ICAEW Employment

BRAND. Cross-national evidence on the relationship between education and attitudes towards immigrants: Past initiatives and.

Equality between women and men in the EU

Migration Report Central conclusions

Free movement of labour and services in the EEA

3.1. Importance of rural areas

Euro area unemployment rate at 9.9% EU27 at 9.4%

Asylum Trends. Appendix: Eurostat data

Romania's position in the online database of the European Commission on gender balance in decision-making positions in public administration

Asylum Trends. Appendix: Eurostat data

Asylum Trends. Appendix: Eurostat data

Asylum Trends. Appendix: Eurostat data

Limited THE EUROPEAN UNION, hereinafter referred to as the "Union" THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM, THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA, THE CZECH REPUBLIC,

The effect of migration in the destination country:

3-The effect of immigrants on the welfare state

Factsheet on rights for nationals of European states and those with an enforceable Community right

Identification of the respondent: Fields marked with * are mandatory.

In 2012, million persons were employed in the EU

AGNIESZKA FIHEL PAWEŁ KACZMARCZYK

UNDER EMBARGO UNTIL 9 APRIL 2018, 15:00 HOURS PARIS TIME

Migrant population of the UK

DEGREE PLUS DO WE NEED MIGRATION?

INVESTING IN AN OPEN AND SECURE EUROPE Two Funds for the period

The regional and urban dimension of Europe 2020

Recent Trends in International Migration

Settling In 2018 Main Indicators of Immigrant Integration

WHO Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel. Findings of the first round of reporting.

EMN Ad-Hoc Query on Ad-Hoc Query on North Korean migrant workers Economic Migration

Size and Development of the Shadow Economy of 31 European and 5 other OECD Countries from 2003 to 2013: A Further Decline

2. The table in the Annex outlines the declarations received by the General Secretariat of the Council and their status to date.

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 21 May /08 ADD 1 ASIM 39 COAFR 150 COEST 101

THE RECAST EWC DIRECTIVE

Migration and Integration

Varieties of Capitalism and Welfare States Policy and Performance

People on the move: impact and integration of migrants in the European Union

PISA 2009 in Hong Kong Result Release Figures and tables accompanying press release article

Determinants of the Trade Balance in Industrialized Countries

Special Eurobarometer 428 GENDER EQUALITY SUMMARY

Transcription:

RECEIVING COUNTRIES PERSPECTIVE CASE OF POLAND Paweł Kaczmarczyk Centre of Migration Research Warsaw University 4th IZA Workshop on EU Enlargement and the Labor Markets: Migration, Crisis, and Adjustment in an Enlarged E(M)U Budapest, 1 2nd July 2011 Outline Enlargement and migration case of Poland 2011 and beyond Questions (partially) unanswered: Migrants strategies and their determinants Return migration Brain drain / brain gain Instead of conclusions 1

EU enlargement process Background institutional changes regarding mobility and migration limitations: transitional periods (part. Germany and Austria), access to welfare systems Enormous impact on international mobility from CEE scale dynamics structural features Foreign residents from the NMS 8 in the selected EU countries, 2000 2007 Source: Bruecker et al. 2009 2

Foreign residents from the NMS 8 in the selected EU countries as per cent of the host population, 2000 2007 (right axis: Ireland) Source: Bruecker et al. 2009 EU 15 emigrants from the NMS 8and NMS 2, 2000 2007 Source: Bruecker et al. 2009 3

EU 15 emigrants from the NMS 8andNMS 2 as per cent of the home population, 2000 2007 Source: Bruecker et al. 2009 Post 2004 migration from Poland (1) Country 2002 () 2004* 2005* 2006* 2007* 2008* 2009* National Census In thousand Total 786 1 000 1 450 1 950 2 270 2 210 1870 Including: EU27 451 750 1 170 1 550 1 860 1 820 1 570 Austria 11 15 25 34 39 40 38 Belgium 14 13 21 28 31 33 34 France 21 30 30 49 55 56 47 Germany 294 385 430 450 490 490 415 Ireland 2 15 76 120 200 180 140 Italy 39 59 70 85 87 88 85 Netherlands 10 23 43 55 98 108 84 Norway.... 36 38 45 Spain 14 26 37 44 80 83 84 Sweden 6 11 17 25 27 29 31 United Kingdom 24 150 340 580 690 650 555 Percentage change as compared with previous year** Total.. 45,0 34,5 16,4 2,6 15,4 EU27.. 56,0 32,5 20,0 2,2 13,7 Austria.. 66,7 36,0 14,7 2,6 5,05 0 Belgium.. 61,5 33,3 10,7 6,5 3,0 France.. 0,0 63,3 12,2 1,8 16,1 Germany.. 11,7 4,7 8,9 0,0 15,3 Ireland.. 406,7 57,9 66,7 10,0 22,2 Italy.. 18,6 21,4 2,4 1,1 3,4 Netherlands.. 87,0 27,9 78,2 10,2 22,2 Norway..... 5,6 18,4 Spain.. 42,3 18,9 81,8 3,8 1,2 Sweden.. 54,5 47,1 8,0 7,4 6,9 United Kingdom.. 126,7 70,6 19,0 5,8 14,6 4

Post 2004 migration from Poland (2) 800 700 600 500 France Germany Ireland 400 Italy Netherlands Spain 300 Sweden United Kingdom 200 100 0 2002 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Source: SOPEMI 2010 Post 2004 migration from Poland (3) Stock of Polish migrants staying temporarily abroad according to Labour Force Survey, 1994 2010 (2 nd quarter) 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Persons staying abroad between 2(3) and 12 months Persons staying abroad longer than 12 months Source: SOPEMI 2010 5

Economic downturn and beyond Country 2002 () 2004* 2005* 2006* 2007* 2008* 2009* National Census In thousand Total 786 1 000 1 450 1 950 2 270 2 210 1870 Including: EU27 451 750 1 170 1 550 1 860 1 820 1 570 Austria 11 15 25 34 39 40 38 Belgium 14 13 21 28 31 33 34 France 21 30 30 49 55 56 47 Germany 294 385 430 450 490 490 415 Ireland 2 15 76 120 200 180 140 Italy 39 59 70 85 87 88 85 Netherlands 10 23 43 55 98 108 84 Norway.... 36 38 45 Spain 14 26 37 44 80 83 84 Sweden 6 11 17 25 27 29 31 United Kingdom 24 150 340 580 690 650 555 Percentage change as compared with previous year** Total.. 45,0 34,5 16,4 2,6 15,4 EU27.. 56,0 32,5 20,0 2,2 13,7 Austria.. 66,7 36,0 14,7 2,6 5,0 Belgium.. 61,5 33,3 10,7 6,5 3,0 France.. 0,0 63,3 12,2 1,8 16,1 Germany.. 11,7 4,7 8,9 0,0 15,3 Ireland.. 406,7 57,9 66,7 10,0 22,2 Italy.. 18,6 21,4 2,4 1,1 3,4 Netherlands.. 87,0 27,9 78,2 10,2 22,2 Norway..... 5,6 18,4 Spain.. 42,3 18,9 81,8 3,8 1,2 Sweden.. 54,5 47,1 8,0 7,4 6,9 United Kingdom.. 126,7 70,6 19,0 5,8 14,6 600 Stock of Polish migrants staying temporarily abroad according to Labour Force Survey, 1994 2010 (2 nd quarter) 500 400 300 200 100 0 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Persons staying abroad between 2(3) and 12 months Persons staying abroad longer than 12 months Source: SOPEMI 2010 6

BUT: Polish migrants according to the UK LFS 700000 600000 500000 400000 300000 200000 100000 0 2004 Q1 2004 Q2 2004 Q3 2004 Q4 2005 Q1 2005 Q2 2005 Q3 2005 Q4 2006 Q1 2006 Q2 2006 Q3 2006 Q4 2007 Q1 2007 Q2 2007 Q3 2007 Q4 2008 Q1 2008 Q2 2008 Q3 2008 Q4 2009 Q1 2009 Q2 2009 Q3 2009 Q4 2010 Q1 2010 Q2 Source: UK LFS 2011 and beyond 2011 endof transitory periods (Austria and Germany) Importance of Germany (historical links, neighborhood, trate relations, income/wage differentials) Shall we expect a new migratory wave? Is Germany labour market really not accessible? Migratory potential (Poland? Romania?) demography, labour markets, regional dimension Demand on foreign labour labour market needs UK and Ireland to what extent unique? availability of other options (contrary to 2004) (Qualitative) scenarios Assessment of the post accession migration already possible (?) 7

2011 and beyond possible scenarios Stock of Polish migrants staying temporarily abroad (2002 2009 CSO, 2010 2015 estimate) 800 Post enlargement impulse scenario 700 R² = 0,61 Status quo scenario 600 500 R² = 0,595 R² = 0,776 zasób polskich migrantów w Niemczech dane szacunkowe trend liniowy trend logarytmiczny 400 trend wykładniczy 300 Diminishing migration potential scenario 200 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2011 and beyond possible scenarios Base scenario (status quo scenario): continuation of recent trends Germany as one of most important destinations, relatively strong demand on foreign labour moderate increase in number of Polish migrants possible (partially: as an outcome of legalization effect): 100 200 thous. till 2015 Post enlargement impulse scenario: serious increase in the scale of Polish German migration due to among others psychological effects related to the opening of the labour market (cfg. 2004 2005 migration to the UK and Ireland) and recruitment of labour increase in number of persons staying temporarily abroad up to 700 thous. (in 2015) AND change in profile of migrants Diminishing migration potential scenario: small increase in migration Diminishing migration potential scenario: small increase in migration possible (in terms of both streams as well as flows), but intensity of migration will diminish along with change in migration potential (demographic factors, socio economic development) stock of migrants in 2015 close to 500 thous. (10% as compared to 2008 and 20% as compared to 2009). 8

Migrants strategies and their determinants Dynamics of enlargement process Do legal rules really matter? (case of the UK semi legality (Kubal 2010, Currie 2008)) Selectivity of migration Socio demographic profile of Polish pre and post accession migrants, selected features in % Source: Own elaboration based on the LFS data 9

Socio demographic profile of Polish post accession migrants in the UK and Germany, selected features in % Source: Own elaboration based on the LFS data Socio demographic profile of Polish post accession migrants in the UK, Italy and Spain, selected features in % Source: Own elaboration based on the LFS data 10

Selectivity patterns explanatory factors Migratory regime UK vs. Germany Socio cultural factors, e.g. language UK / Ireland vs. Sweden Structure of the receiving labour markets UK vs. Italy; UK vs. Netherlands Insitutions of the labour market UK vs. Sweden; UK vs. Netherlands Role of migrant networks UK / Ireland vs. Germany / Italy / Spain Return migration Return as a natural consequence of each outflow Massive post enlargement migration massive return migration expected td Estimates: No reliable data (till 2010 Census) CSO estimate 2009/2007: 400 thous. (17,6%) LFS (2008, ) 580 thous. (but: definition of returnee) CMR database migrants and return migrants 9% 11

Return migration The emigrants and return migrants by level of education (in percentage) and the selectivity index Level of education Emigrants (%) Return migrants (%) Selectivity index University degree 14.1 10.2 0.28 Secondary 14.1 12.9 0.09 Secondary vocational 30.0 29.7 0.01 Vocational 33.4 38.6 0.16 Primary 8.4 8.5 0.01 Total 100.00 100.00 Source: own elaboration on the basis of the LFS. Source: Anacka, Fihel and Kaczmarczyk 2011. Return migration The emigrants and return migrants by country of destination (most important, in percentage) and the selectivity index Country of destination Emigrants (%) Return migrants (%) Selectivity index EU 15 80.8 82.6 0.02 Austria 2.0 1.4 0.30 Belgium 2.4 2.0 0.18 France 3.4 3.8 0.12 Germany 23.3 30.9 0.33 Greece 1.3 1.3 0.01 Ireland 6.6 3.7 0.43 Italy 8.9 9.8 0.10 Netherlands 4.8 5.5 0.13 Spain 2.9 3.1 0.10 Sweden 14 1.4 17 1.7 020 0.20 United Kingdom 22.8 18.0 0.21 other Norway 1.8 2.0 0.09 The United States 11.8 8.0 0.33 Source: own elaboration on the basis of the LFS. Source: Anacka, Fihel and Kaczmarczyk 2011. 12

Return migration selectivity of outflow (left panel) and return migration (right panel) Source: Anacka, Fihel and Kaczmarczyk 2011. Return migration The emigrants and return migrants by type of settlement in Poland (in percentage) and the selectivity index Place of origin/ residence Emigrants (%) Return migrants (%) Selectivity index Urban 57.1 43.2 0.24 Rural 42.9 56.8 0.33 Total 100.0 100.0 Source: own elaboration on the basis of the LFS. Source: Anacka, Fihel and Kaczmarczyk 2011. 13

Return migration logit model of return migration Return migration logit model Variable ẋβ exp(ẋβ) p value Significance level Age age category: "up to 24" 0,12 1,124 0,28 age category: "30 39" 0,20 1,223 0,07 * age category: "40 and over" 0,22 1,252 0,04 ** Sex sex: "male" 0,10 1,102 0,22 Education education: "vocational" 0,25 1,287 0,06 * education: "secondary, post secondary" 0,14 1,146 0,31 education: "university degree" 0,08 0,922 0,64 Type of settlemement type of settlement: "urban area" 0,30 0,744 0,00 *** Region region: "kujawsko pomorskie" 0,09 0,912 0,66 region: "lubelskie" 0,21 1,238 0,21 region: "lubuskie" 0,27 0,762 0,26 region: "łódzkie" 0,05 1,050 0,82 region: "małopolskie" 0,38, 0,683 0,03 ** region: "mazowieckie" 0,65 0,523 0,02 ** region: "opolskie" 0,51 0,599 0,01 *** region: "podkarpackie" 0,18 0,838 0,27 region: "podlaskie" 0,28 0,752 0,14 region: "pomorskie" 0,55 0,576 0,03 ** region: "śląskie" 0,94 0,389 0,00 *** region: "świętokrzyskie" 0,23 1,262 0,18 region: "warmińsko mazurskie" 0,54 0,583 0,03 ** region: "wielkopolskie" 0,20 1,222 0,32 region: "zachodniopomorskie" 0,33 0,719 0,14 Intercept 2,30 0,101 0,00 *** Source: Anacka, Fihel and Kaczmarczyk 2011. Brain drain / brain gain Mobility of highly skilled as one central issues in migrationdevelopment debate From traditional approach (brain drain) to the new economics of brain drain Beine et al. (2001) brain effect and drain effect Beneficial Brain Drain possible empirical, not theoretical, question BUT: problematic assumptions 14

Is there a brain drain? Percentage of persons with tertiary education in the native and migrant population in the NMS, 2006 35 30 Resident population Migrant population Migrant population, age adjusted 25 20 15 10 5 0 Bulgaria Czech Republic Estonia Hungary Lithuania Latvia Poland Romania Slovenia Slovak Republic Source: Bruecker et al. 2010 Brain overflow? Unemployment rate in Poland, 1999-2010, in % Source: Eurostat 15

Brain effect? accumulation of human capital Percentages of students in the population aged 15-29, EU25 and NMS10, 2000-2007 30% 25% EU25 Bulgaria 20% Czech Republic Estonia Latvia 15% Lithuania Hungary 10% Poland Romania 5% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Source: Eurostat Accumulation of human capital share of persons with tertiary education Source: Eurostat 16

Integration on the labour market abroad UK experience Distribution of the Polish population in Poland and in the UK by occupation (%), 2006 and 2010 2006 2010 80 80 70 70 60 60 50 50 40 Poles in the UK Poles in Poland 40 Poles in the UK Poles in Poland 30 30 20 20 10 10 0 high-skilled middle low-skilled 0 high-skilled middle low-skilled Source: Olszewska 2011 Brain waste? Net weekly pay of full-time workers from Poland in the UK nominal and relative to the average (as per cent, in bold) Pre-accession migrants Post-accession migrants Age left full-time education Less than 15 16 to 17 Age groups Age groups Total 15-20 21-29 31-45 45+ 15-20 21-29 31-45 45+ Total - 231.00 174.00 181.50 192.00-266.75 176.00 219.50 226.00-73.8 55.6 58.0 61.4-117.4 77.5 96.6 99.5 120.00 200.00 242.33 257.17 243.12 145.67 190.50 226.10 195.08 197.24 38.4 63.9 77.5 82.2 77.7 64.1 83.9 99.5 85.9 86.8 62.50 234.35 279.94 261.55 250.89 207.22 202.81 220.47 236.42 217.65 18 to 20 20.0 74.9 89.5 83.6 80.2 91.2 89.3 97.1 104.1 95.8-274.83 394.57 393.38 354.54-223.97 306.04 255.99 244.67 More than 21 87.9 126.1 125.7 113.3-98.6 134.7 112.7 107.7 120.00 - - - 120.00 518.00 - - - 518.00 Students 38.4 - - - 38.4 228.1 - - - 228.1 91.25 260.45 352.77 334.35 312.83 212.95 212.36 249.97 240.42 227.14 29.2 83.3 112.8 106.9 100.0 93.8 93.5 110.1 105.8 100.0 Total Source: own elaboration based on the LFS data Net weekly pay of full-time workers from EU14 in the UK nominal and relative to the average (as per cent, in bold) EU15 immigrants Age groups Age left full-time education 15-20 21-29 31-45 45+ Total 172.1313 242.4040 249.4444 256.05 250.82 Less than 15 55.4 78.1 80.3 82.5 80.8 165.62 275.65 314.53 303.23 294.95 16 to 17 53.3 88.8 101.3 97.6 95.0 176.14 253.78 360.63 372.94 324.36 18 to 20 56.7 81.7 116.1 120.1 104.5 348.29 523.33 519.99 464.66 More than 21 112.2 168.5 167.5 149.6 224.00 220.28 385.00 342.67 240.07 Students 72.1 70.9 124.0 110.3 77.3 114.40 270.01 359.05 306.48 310.53 Total 36.8 87.0 115.6 98.7 100.0 Source: own elaboration based on the LFS data 17

Brain waste? Net weekly pay of full-time native workers in the UK nominal and relative to the average (as per cent, in bold), 2002 and 2006 2002, 2006, Age left full-time Age groups Age groups education 15-20 21-29 31-45 45+ Total 15-20 21-29 31-45 45+ Total 150.00 246.14 256.29 254.61 253.00 143.08 281.14 303.28 294.49 293.48 Less than 15 47.9 78.6 81.9 81.3 80.88 40.44 79.3 85.55 83.1 82.88 158.53 245.59 297.77 310.96 283.04 166.50 269.44 330.91 335.33 314.90 16 to 17 50.6 78.4 95.1 99.3 90.4 47.0 76.0 93.3 94.6 88.8 166.72 257.02 356.45 369.97 316.42 187.90 272.45 392.81 414.18 354.21 18 to 20 53.3 82.1 113.9 118.2 101.1 53.0 76.8 110.8 116.8 99.9 325.44 510.08 474.45 438.32 361.92 530.41 550.13 480.74 More than 21 103.9 162.9 151.5 140.0 102.1 149.6 155.2 135.6 154.00 188.14 - - 176.76 187.30 226.13 300.00-209.58 Students 49.2 60.1 56.5 52.8 63.8 84.6 59.1 159.91 271.48 343.04 321.44 313.07 171.26 304.20 383.30 367.79 354.54 Total 51.1 86.7 109.6 102.7 100.0 48.3 85.8 108.1 103.7 100.0 Source: own elaboration based on the LFS data Econometrics Instead of conclusions Potential areas of future research: Migration to Germany Assessment of post-enlargement migration Return migration (and development): Labour market impacts macro and micro effects Entrepreneurship Social remittances International and internal mobility (crowding-out hypothesis) Transmigration (?) 18