Immigration Reform and Agriculture Conference: Implications for Farmers, Farm Workers, and Communities University of California, D.C.

Similar documents
NAWS at 30. Changing Crop Worker Characteristics: Findings from the National Agricultural Workers Survey,

California Crop Worker Characteristics:

NAWS Research. Jeff Perloff

IMMIGRATION REFORM, JOB SELECTION AND WAGES IN THE U.S. FARM LABOR MARKET

The Shadow Value of Legal Status --A Hedonic Analysis of the Earnings of U.S. Farm Workers 1

The Florida Farm Labor Market

Abstract. Acknowledgments

Findings from the National Agricultural Workers Survey (NAWS) : A Demographic and Employment Profile of United States Farmworkers

Immigrants are playing an increasingly

Statistical Brief No. 2 Cifras Breves No. 2

UC Agriculture & Natural Resources California Agriculture

Immigration & Farm Labor 2017

Executive Summary. Overview --Fresh Market Tomatoes in California and Baja

Does Immigration Reduce Wages?

Pulling Open the Sticky Door

[ : The National Agricultural Workers Survey, Part A] SUPPORTING STATEMENT THE NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL WORKERS SURVEY (NAWS)

Immigration and Farm Labor: Policy Options and Consequences

Immigration Policy and Its Possible Effects on U.S. Agriculture

Immigration & Farm Labor

Recent Trends in the Market for Hired Farm Labor in the United States

Immigration and Farm Labor: Policy Options and Consequences Philip Martin April 23, 2012

Agricultural Outlook Forum Presented: March 1-2, 2007 U.S. Department of Agriculture

Immigrant Legalization: Assessing the Labor Market Effects. Magnus Lofstrom Laura Hill, Joseph Hayes

Turnover in U. S. Agricultural Labor Markets

Immigration and Farm Labor Supply 1

Farm Labor Shortages and Immigration Policy

Farm Labor Shortages and Immigration Policy

Guest Workers: New Solution, New Problem?

ALBERTA FEDERATION OF LABOUR

The H-2A Program and Immigration Reform in the United States. Berdikul Qushim, Zhengfei Guan, 1 Fritz M. Roka University of Florida

An Overview of the Farm Labor Market

Wage and Working Condition Differentials among U.S. Agricultural Workers

A Demographic Profile of Mexican Immigrants in the United States

Migration Information Source - Chinese Immigrants in the United States

The Living Wage: Survey of Labor Economists

Illegal Immigration: How Should We Deal With It?

Risk Management Strategies Concerning Seasonal Farmworkers 1

BY Rakesh Kochhar FOR RELEASE MARCH 07, 2019 FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:

The foreign born are more geographically concentrated than the native population.

Le Sueur County Demographic & Economic Profile Prepared on 7/12/2018

Immigration and the US Economy:

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE OCTOBER 29, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:

Section IV A Binational Look at Household Composition, Gender and Age Distribution, and Educational Experiences. Executive Summary:

Characteristics of People. The Latino population has more people under the age of 18 and fewer elderly people than the non-hispanic White population.

Adjusting to a Post-NAFTA Mexico: What It Means for California

Survey Evidence on Legal and Illegal Hispanic Immigrants Perceptions of Living and Working in US Agriculture

Stunning Increase. Econ 113: April 23, Activity: Fertility Then & Now. Group Discussion Questions 4/22/2015 9:12 AM

The occupational structure and mobility of migrants in the Greek rural labour markets

California Hired Farm Labor : Change and Continuity Philip Martin April 30, 2011

Poverty and the Binational Population: A Note on Poverty Measurement

Changing Dynamics and. to the United States

An Estimation of Producer Preferences, and the Wage, Hours, and Gross Sales Effects of Migrant Labor in Alabama s Horticulture Industry

COLORADO S GREEN, AG AND PROCESSING INDUSTRY EMPLOYMENT: TRENDS AND IMPORTANCE TO THE STATE

Labor Market Characteristics of Agricultural Workers in the United States,

GREEN CARDS AND THE LOCATION CHOICES OF IMMIGRANTS IN THE UNITED STATES,

The H-2A Program and Immigration Reform in the United States 1

oductivity Estimates for Alien and Domestic Strawberry Workers and the Number of Farm Workers Required to Harvest the 1988 Strawberry Crop

Integrating Latino Immigrants in New Rural Destinations. Movement to Rural Areas

CHOICES The magazine of food, farm, and resource issues

The Seasonal Agricultural Workers Scheme

Openness and Poverty Reduction in the Long and Short Run. Mark R. Rosenzweig. Harvard University. October 2003

NFU Seasonal Labour Survey: Results & Analysis

INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION IN THE AMERICAS

IRLE. A Comparison of The CPS and NAWS Surveys of Agricultural Workers. IRLE WORKING PAPER #32-91 June 1991

Expanding Employment Prospects for Adults with Limited English Skills. Elise Richer Center for Law and Social Policy NAWRS Conference July 15, 2003

Do Minimum Wage Laws Affect People Who Are Not Covered? Evidence from Documented and Undocumented, Hourly and Piece Rate Workers in U.S.

Growing Modern American Guestworkers: The Increasing Supply of Temporary H-2A Agricultural Workers*

The Effects of E-Verify Laws

Immigration into the Carolinas by David Griffith

Policies, Work, and Community: Why Idaho Farmworkers Choose to Stay

Brockton and Abington

March 14, To Members of the Georgia Congressional Delegation,

U.S. CHILDREN S DEMOGRAPHICS: RACE-ETHNICITY-IMMIGRANT-ORIGINS, INCOME INEQUALITY, AND PARENTAL EDUCATION

INTRODUCTION ANALYSIS

Immigration from Latin America

Measuring What Workers Pay to get Jobs Abroad Philip Martin, Prof. Emeritus, University of California, Davis

Gendered Patterns and Shifts. Vanderbilt University

The End of Farm Labor Abundance

League of Women Voters Grand Traverse Leelanau Unit Study Committee

Summary of the U.S. Census Bureau s 2015 County-Level Population and Component Estimates for Massachusetts

Transitions to Work for Racial, Ethnic, and Immigrant Groups

Latinos in Massachusetts Selected Areas: Framingham

New public charge rules issued by the Trump administration expand the list of programs that are considered

A Portrait of Foreign-Born Teachers in the United States. By Yukiko Furuya, Mohammad Ismail Nooraddini, Wenjing Wang, and Michele Waslin 1

CHOICES The magazine of food, farm, and resource issues

Immigrants and the Receipt of Unemployment Insurance Benefits

Immigration and the U.S. Economy

Unexpected Harvest: A Study of Californian Agricultural Wages after the IRCA

Demographic, Economic and Social Transformations in Bronx Community District 4: High Bridge, Concourse and Mount Eden,

Out-migration from metropolitan cities in Brazil

The Effects on U.S. Farm Workers of an Agricultural Guest Worker Program

Rural Poverty in Canada. Robert Annis and Lonnie Patterson Rural Development Institute Brandon University

Immigrant Legalization: Assessing the Labor Market Effects. Laura Hill Magnus Lofstrom, Joseph Hayes

THE DECLINE IN WELFARE RECEIPT IN NEW YORK CITY: PUSH VS. PULL

Mexico. Brazil. Colombia. Guatemala. El Salvador. Dominican Republic

Immigration and Farm Labor: Challenges and Opportunities

Analysis of birth records shows that in 2002 almost one in four births in the United States was to an

SPECIAL RELEASE. EMPLOYMENT SITUATION IN NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION January 2012 Final Results

Farmworker Housing Needs

During the early 1990s, recession

Transcription:

Immigration Reform and Agriculture Conference: Implications for Farmers, Farm Workers, and Communities University of California, D.C. Campus 12 May 2011 Changing Characteristics of U.S. Farm Workers: 21 Years of Findings from the National Agricultural Workers Survey Daniel Carroll U.S. Department of Labor Annie Georges JBS International Russell Saltz Graduate Student London School of Economics * Disclaimer: Any views expressed or interpretations of the data made in this presentation are solely those of the authors

National Agricultural Worker Survey (NAWS) NAWS is a nationally representative random sample survey of hired crop farm workers; it is sponsored by the U.S. Department of Labor and conducted by JBS International, Aguirre Division. NAWS collects demographic, employment, and health information directly from farm workers through face-toface interviews. Various Federal agencies use NAWS information for program purposes. The survey is in its 23 rd year. Since 1989, more than 54,000 workers have been interviewed. 2

Overview Demographic Characteristics Employment Characteristics Earnings, Income and Public Assistance Characteristics 3

Demographics Place of Birth 10 9 8 7 6 5 Mexico Other Central America USA and Puerto Rico 4 33% 24% 17% 26% 25% 29% 2% 5% 1% 2% 4% 3% 3% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 3% 3% 4 3 54% 61% 7 79% 72% 71% 68% 4

Foreign Born: Years Since First Arrival 0-4 5-9 10-19 20 + Percent Foreign Born Foreign Born Farm Workers Years Since First Arrival 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 13% 12% 12% 14% 18% 24% 29% 32% 29% 26% 22% 24% 22% 16% 26% 18% 22% 16% 27% 19% 19% 29% 37% 43% 48% 42% 35% 26% 9 85% 8 75% 7 65% 6 55% 5 Percent of U.S. Farm Workers Foreign Born 5

Shifts in Mexico Sending Regions 6 5 4 3 West Central Rest of Mexico Pacific South 55% 48% 45% 48% 47% 44% 44% 45% 39% 41% 41% 38% 35% 35% 21% 16% 15% 5% 7% 11% 6

Indigenous Mexicans and Central Americans 18% 16% 14% 12% 16% 15% 11% 8% 9% 6% 4% 2% 4% 3% 5% 7

Farm Worker Age 10 14-17 years 18-21 years 22-24 years 25+ years Average Age 37 Percent in Each Age Group 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 68% 33 11% 17% 36 35 63% 62% 65% 69% 71% 76% 33 31 31 31 11% 12% 13% 12% 18% 19% 9% 18% 14% 16% 13% 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 Average Age 4% 8% 8% 5% 5% 3% 3% 28 8

Farm Worker Education Percent in Average Highest Grade Completed by Grade Group 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 No Primary Primary (1-6 years) Middle (7-9 years) High School (10-12 years) Post-Secondary (13-16 years) Average highest grade completed 6% 5% 5% 4% 6% 8% 9% 18% 22% 32% 29% 23% 23% 28% 8 8 8 22% 18% 19% 22% 22% 17% 7 7 7 7 4 42% 47% 52% 46% 42% 4 5% 5% 6% 4% 4% 4% 5% 9 8 7 6 Average Highest Grade Completed 9

2007 2009: English Speaking Ability All U.S. Farm Workers Not at all A little Somewhat Well 10 9 8 U.S.-born (not P.R.) Foreign-born (including P.R.) 99% 3 35% 7 6 8% 27% 5 4 3 48% 37% 10 1% 11% 3% Not at all A little Somewhat Well

2007 2009: Foreign Born English Speaking Ability 0-4 Years Since First Arrival to U.S Not at all A little Somewhat Well 4% 1% 5-9 Years Since First Arrival to U.S Not at all A little Somewhat Well 1% 22% 49% 39% 74% 10-19 Years Since First Arrival to U.S Not at all A little Somewhat Well 20+ Years Since First Arrival to U.S Not at all A little Somewhat Well 5% 6% 14% 41% 17% 3 4 47% 11

Marital Status Marital Status 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 Single Married/Living together Separated/Divorced/Widowed Parent 7% 5% 4% 6% 5% 5% 6% 58% 35% 52% 52% 52% 57% 57% 59% 43% 44% 41% 38% 38% 35% 54% 52% 5 48% 46% 44% 42% 4 Percent of Farm Workers who are Parents 38% 12

Migrant Type Migrant Worker Composition 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 Domestic follow the crop Domestic shuttler Foreign Born Newcomer 21% 34% 41% 39% 42% 35% 4 17% 31% 16% 13% 28% 15% 8% 29% 11% 14% 6% 4% International follow the crop International shuttler Migrant 27% 25% 29% 15% 17% 3% 3% 21% 21% 15% 13% 15% 13% 16% 6 5 4 3 - Percent of U.S. Farm Workers who are Migrant Workers 13

Current Status 10 Unauthorized Work Authorized Green Card Citizen 9 8 43% 35% 26% 28% 27% 33% 7 6 5 13% 21% 24% 3% 25% 1% 21% 22% 1% 1% 18% 1% 4 7% 3 29% 37% 47% 54% 5 5 48% 14% 14

6 Special Agricultural Workers (SAW) and Unauthorized Farm Workers 5 4 3 Immigration Reform and Control Act Inacted National Agriculture Workers Survey Begins SAW Unauthorized 15 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Special Agricultural Workers (SAW) and Unauthorized Farm Workers 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 Immigration Reform and Control Act Inacted National Agriculture Workers Survey Begins SAW (2 Year Moving Avg) Unauthorized (2 Year Moving Avg) 0.1 0 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 16

0.6 Special Agricultural Workers (SAW) and Unauthorized Farm Workers 0.5 0.4 0.3 Immigration Reform and Control Act Inacted National Agriculture Workers Survey Begins SAW (3 Year Moving Avg) Unauthorized (3 Year Moving Avg) 0.2 0.1 0 17

Current Status of 1986 IRCA-Legalized 10 9 8 Citizen Green Card Work Authorized 1% 1% 11% 32% 7 6 5 4 3 9 68% 87% 91% 93% 89% 83% 1% 3% 9% 6% 17% 18

Current Status of those Legalized through Family Programs 10 9 Green Card Citizen Work Authorized 5% 7% 7% 8% 8% 5% 8 8% 11% 11% 13% 7% 18% 7 6 5 4 95% 85% 82% 82% 8 83% 76% 3 19

Mixed Status Families as a Percentage of Families 3 25% 24% 21% 15% 15% 9% 5% 6% 20 1995-1997 1998-2000 2001-2003 2004-2006 2007-2009

Mixed Status Families as a Percentage of all FWs 14% 12% 12% 8% 6% 7% 4% 4% 2% 3% 3% 21 1992-1994 1995-1997 1998-2000 2001-2003 2004-2006 2007-2009

Demographics Summary The Mexico-born peaked at 79 percent in 1998-2000. The average age of crop workers has increased more in recent periods; it is now 36. The share of unauthorized workers has remained roughly 50 percent since 2001. The share of farm workers who migrate has been decreasing. An increasing share of immigrant crop workers is naturalizing. The share of mixed-status families is increasing. 22

Employment Years of U.S. Farm Work Experience Percent in Each Years of Experience Group 10 0-4 5-9 10-19 20 + Avg. Number of Years US FW Exp 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 15% 11% 12% 12% 18% 21% 26% 24% 26% 23% 21% 23% 19% 18% 19% 21% 21% 24% 18% 36% 43% 49% 51% 42% 37% 32% 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 Average Years of U.S. Farm Work Experience 23

Number of Farm Employers Per Year 1 2 3 or more 10 9 8 7 6 27% 21% 21% 19% 16% 13% 6% 6% 18% 21% 21% 14% 13% 5 4 3 52% 6 63% 65% 72% 79% 81% 24

Average Number of FW Weeks 40 Farm Work Weeks 35 30 25 20 15 28 26 24 27 31 34 35 10 5 0 25

Employment Type Direct hire Labor contracted 10 9 8 16% 15% 23% 27% 21% 14% 12% 7 6 5 4 3 84% 85% 77% 73% 79% 86% 88% 26

Payment Method 10 9 8 7 By the Hour By the Piece Combo Hourly and Piece Salary or Other 2% 2% 1% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% 5% 4% 6% 2% 2% 11% 11% 16% 15% 22% 23% 24% 6 5 4 3 73% 73% 74% 79% 79% 83% 83% 27

Primary Crop at Time of Interview Field Crops Fruits and Nuts Horticulture Crop Vegetables Misc/Mult 4 35% 3 35% 28% 32% 31% 34% 29% 37% 32% 31% 27% 35% 25% 15% 5% 25% 25% 24% 23% 19% 18% 17% 17% 16% 16% 15% 12% 12% 9% 9% 6% 7% 6% 7% 4% 5% 1989-1991 1992-1994 1995-1997 1998-2000 2001-2003 2004-2006 2007-2009 28

Primary Task at Time of Interview 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 Pre-Harvest Harvest Post-Harvest Technical Supervisor Other 7% 6% 5% 3% 1% 18% 27% 32% 18% 21% 25% 26% 13% 14% 12% 23% 15% 18% 16% 12% 12% 41% 42% 36% 27% 29% 29% 22% 17% 21% 17% 18% 27% 29

Employment Summary U.S. farm workers have an average of 13 years of U.S. farm work experience, which has been steadily increasing since the 1998-2000 period. Crop workers are performing more weeks of farm employment per year. The vast majority of farm workers have one farm employer per year. 30

Income and Aid Nominal Avg. Wage (3Yr Moving Avg.) Minimum NAWS NASS Non Farm $18 $17 $16 $15 $14 $13 $12 $11 $10 $9 $8 $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 31

Real Average Wage (3 Year Rolling Avg.) $19 $18 $17 $16 $15 $14 $13 $12 $11 $10 $9 $8 $7 $6 $5 Minimum NAWS NASS Non Farm 32

Average Income by Income Type Personal income (farm only) Personal income (all sources) Family income (all sources) $17,500- $19,999 $7,500- $9,999 $5,000- $7,499 $7,500- $9,999 $5,000- $7,499 $2,500- $4,999 $7,500- $9,999 $5,000- $7,499 $2,500- $4,999 $10,000- $12,499 $7,500- $9,999 $5,000- $7,499 $12,500- $14,999 $10,000- $12,499 $15,000- $17,499 $12,500- $14,999 $15,000- $17,499 $12,500- $14,999 33

Total Family Income Below the Poverty Level 6 5 56% 4 42% 46% 3 3 27% 23% 34 1992-1994 1995-1997 1998-2000 2001-2003 2004-2006 2007-2009

Public Assistance: (respondent and/or family member use in the last two years) 10 9 8 7 6 No public assistance Need-based Contribution-based Both need- and contribution-based 8% 9% 9% 8% 14% 12% 14% 15% 12% 13% 14% 14% 12% 16% 17% 23% 5 4 3 59% 63% 67% 65% 6 58% 57% 35

Type of Public Assistance Received: (respondent and/or family member use in the last two years) Need-based Contribution-based Type of Public Assistance Received Both need- and contribution-based 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 19% 24% 29% 25% 25% 23% 19% 41% 5 37% 33% 35% 4 42% 38% 31% 35% 35% 35% Share of FW who Received Public Assistance 43% 28% 3 38% 4 39% 4 42% 52% 5 45% 4 35% 3 25% 15% 5% Share of Farm Workers Receiving Public Assistance 36

Status of Needs Based Assistance Recipients (respondent and/or family member use in the last two years) Citizen Work Authorized Share of FW who Received Public Assistance Green Card Unauthorized Status of those Receiving Needs Based Public Assistance 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 7% 26% 22% 28% 37% 42% 47% 18% 7% 3% 2% 1% 28% 43% 45% 3 3% 1% 35% 24% 54% 39% 31% 25% 32% 21% 28% 35% 3 25% 15% 5% Share of Farm Workers Receiving Needs Based Public Assistance 37

Status of Public Assistance Recipients: Both Types (respondent and/or family member use in the last two years) 10 9 Citizen Green Card Work Authorized Unauthorized 8% 22% 17% 21% 25% 27% 35% 8 7 6 5 23% 21% 9% 32% 3% 49% 2% 51% 1% 38% 2% 1% 37% 27% 4 3 38 49% 37% 31% 27% 36% 33% 38% 1989-1991 1992-1994 1995-1997 1998-2000 2001-2003 2004-2006 2007-2009

Earnings, Income, and Public Assistance Summary Average hourly earning increased nominally and in real terms, but not as much as the earnings of non-farm workers. The share of workers with total family incomes below poverty decreased. The share of workers receiving public assistance increased by 30 percent between the periods1995-1997 and 2007-2009. Use of needs-based public assistance increased between the periods1998-2000 and 2007-2009, while use of contribution-based assistance decreased. 39

For Additional Information Background information on the NAWS, including survey methodology and public access data, is available at: http://www.doleta.gov/agworker/naws.cfm Information may also be obtained from: Daniel Carroll U.S. Department of Labor (202) 693-2795 carroll.daniel.j@dol.gov Susan Gabbard JBS International, Inc., Aguirre Division (650) 373-4900 sgabbard@jbsinternational.com 40