Police Reference Check Program - Establishment of Criminal Record and Judicial Matters Checks Process and Proposed Fee

Similar documents
Police Record Checks Reform Act, 2015 Background and Overview. Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Police Record Check Reform Act (PRCRA) Bill 113. Presented to the Greater Sudbury Police Services Board November 21, 2018

Abuse and Misuse of Accessible Parking Permits. Disability, Access and Inclusion Advisory Committee

Local Police Check Instructions: London Region London

1ST SESSION, 42ND LEGISLATURE, ONTARIO 67 ELIZABETH II, Bill 5. (Chapter 11 of the Statutes of Ontario, 2018)

Memorandum of Understanding between SAMPLE. Toronto Police Service (hereinafter called the "Service") and. (hereinafter called the "Agency")

Code of Procedure for Matters under the Personal Health

Form NC-1: NOMINATION CONTESTANT Registration and Change Notice Form

Lobbying Disclosure for Board Members Policy Proposed Revisions

Membership Application (Please complete the front and back of the application)

FORM 32 PERFORMANCE BOND UNDER SECTION 85.1 OF THE ACT Construction Act

2ND SESSION, 41ST LEGISLATURE, ONTARIO 66 ELIZABETH II, Bill 68. (Chapter 10 of the Statutes of Ontario, 2017)

Search Warrant. Appendix H (ii)

Once the application has been deemed complete by Planning Services, a Technical meeting will be scheduled within three to four weeks.

STEPS FOR VULNERABLE SECTOR APPLICANTS

Victim-Centred Considerations for the Consultation on the Review of Record Suspensions. Submission to Public Safety Canada

ACCESS TO INFORMATION ACT

2009 Bill 205. Second Session, 27th Legislature, 58 Elizabeth II THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ALBERTA BILL 205

2017 Bill 214. Third Session, 29th Legislature, 66 Elizabeth II THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ALBERTA BILL 214

Building Materials Evaluation Commission Guidelines, Policies, and Procedures Handbook

ONTARIO SECURITIES COMMISSION PRACTICE GUIDELINE

FOR INDIVIDUALS SEEKING EMPLOYMENT OR VOLUNTEER OPPORTUNITIES

PROPOSED MODEL HOME AGREEMENT BAYRIDGE CROSSING PHASE 2 DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION FOR LOTS 1, 16, 17, 25 AND 26.

The Health Information Protection Regulations

RETAINER AGREEMENT CIVIC RESETTLEMENT PROGRAM. Re: Civic Resettlement of refugee applicant(s)

2018 Bill 7. Fourth Session, 29th Legislature, 67 Elizabeth II THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ALBERTA BILL 7 SUPPORTING ALBERTA S LOCAL FOOD SECTOR ACT

APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL: BROKERAGE

BC SPCA Constitution and Bylaws

BC SPCA Constitution and Bylaws

GINGERBREAD NURSERY SCHOOL CRIMINAL REFERENCE CHECK POLICY Date Effective: May 27, 2016

2.16 Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act

Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005 S.O. 2005, CHAPTER 11

Ontario Immigrant Nominee Program. CERC Conference November 29, 2017

Criminal Record Check Process

2ND SESSION, 41ST LEGISLATURE, ONTARIO 66 ELIZABETH II, Bill 163

The Corporation of the TOWN OF MILTON

2ND SESSION, 41ST LEGISLATURE, ONTARIO 66 ELIZABETH II, Bill 114. An Act to provide for Anti-Racism Measures

Student Police Information Check Frequently Asked Questions

FOR INDIVIDUALS SEEKING EMPLOYMENT OR VOLUNTEER OPPORTUNITIES

Law Enforcement Request for Personal Information Procedures - What to do When a Police Officer Asks for Information

2ND SESSION, 41ST LEGISLATURE, ONTARIO 67 ELIZABETH II, Bill 203. An Act respecting transparency of pay in employment

Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC

A Guide to Ontario Legislation Covering the Release of Students

ROUTINE ACCESS POLICY. For the Nova Scotia Workers Compensation Appeals Tribunal. October 2003 (Revised April 2005)

September 10, 2012 VIA

NEW POLICE CLEARANCE PROCESS AND FORMS June 2012

3RD SESSION, 41ST LEGISLATURE, ONTARIO 67 ELIZABETH II, Bill 14. An Act with respect to the custody, use and disclosure of personal information

Vulnerable Victims and Witnesses Adult VUL 1 CHA 1 DIR 1. March 1, Principle

Five questions about blowing the whistle

LOCAL GOVERNMENT BYLAW NOTICE ENFORCEMENT ACT

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT J. WILSON, KARAKATSANIS, AND BRYANT JJ. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

What Every Candidate Needs to Know

NOTICE OF BROKERAGE/SOLE PROPRIETOR CHANGE

APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT: BROKERAGE

APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT: PARTNERSHIP

Real Estate Council of Ontario

CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON BY-LAW NUMBER 2011-XX

SECTION 3 RECRUITMENT AND STAFFING CRIMINAL RECORDS CHECK CIVIL SERVICE ACT REGULATIONS GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS/AGENCIES

IN BRIEF MAKING A NEW LAW. Ontario Justice Education Network

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE MINISTER OF HEALTH AND LONG-TERM CARE AND THE

Memorandum of Understanding. Between. Minister of Finance. And. Chair, Financial Services Commission of Ontario & Chair, Financial Services Tribunal

APPLICATION FOR NEW: SOLE PROPRIETOR

A Short Guide to The Canadian Abridgment in Print and on

Candidate Guide Municipal Election

2ND SESSION, 41ST LEGISLATURE, ONTARIO 66 ELIZABETH II, Bill 166. (Chapter 33 of the Statutes of Ontario, 2017)

2ND SESSION, 41ST LEGISLATURE, ONTARIO 66 ELIZABETH II, Bill 68. An Act to amend various Acts in relation to municipalities

Form NCR-1: NOMINATION CONTEST REPORT

CITY OF TORONTO ACT COMPLAINT VACANT UNIT REBATE

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.

Entertainment Industry Act 2013 No 73

TORONTO POLICE SERVICES BOARD REGULATED INTERACTION WITH THE COMMUNITY AND THE COLLECTION OF IDENTIFYING INFORMATION

NO PURCHASE NECESSARY. There are two (2) ways to enter this Contest, as follows:

2ND SESSION, 41ST LEGISLATURE, ONTARIO 66 ELIZABETH II, Bill 39. (Chapter 6 of the Statutes of Ontario, 2017)

THIS AGREEMENT dated for reference the day of, A DIRECTOR DESIGNATED UNDER SECTION 91 OF THE CHILD, FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICE ACT

LES MAISONS CO-OPERATIVE ST. JACQUES PHASE 2 INVITATION TO TENDER (ITT) # ACCESSIBILITY IMPROVEMENT FEATURES

BYLAW NO. 05/ 037 BEING A BYLAW OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO, FOR THE PURPOSE OF DELIVERING EMERGENCY SERVICES.

3RD SESSION, 41ST LEGISLATURE, ONTARIO 67 ELIZABETH II, Bill 3. An Act respecting transparency of pay in employment

ACCESS FACT SHEET. Frivolous and Vexatious Requests WHAT IS A FRIVOLOUS OR VEXATIOUS REQUEST?

The Lobbying Act. Karen E. Shepherd Commissioner. February 8, Commissariat au lobbying du Canada

Health Profession Corporations

August 15, 2018 Page 1 of 5

POLITICAL PARTY FUNDING BILL

2ND SESSION, 41ST LEGISLATURE, ONTARIO 66 ELIZABETH II, Bill 139

CANADIAN ANTI-SPAM LAW [FEDERAL]

Public Services Ombudsman (Wales) Bill

The Local Authority Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Regulations

APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT: SALESPERSON / BROKER

FUTURESTAR SPORTS SERVICE AGREEMENT. THIS FUTURESTAR SPORTS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") dated. (The "Client") - AND -

Toronto Community Housing Corporation Annual Shareholder Meeting, Audited Financial Statements, and Related Matters

GOVERNMENT GAZETTE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA

2ND SESSION, 41ST LEGISLATURE, ONTARIO 66 ELIZABETH II, Bill 87. (Chapter 11 of the Statutes of Ontario, 2017)

Corporation of the City of St. Thomas. Consultation Process

CUSTODIAL AGREEMENT. by and among CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE. as Seller, Servicer and Cash Manager. and

BY-LAW NO. 44 ONTARIO COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORKERS AND SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS - RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE

ISSN # Price $5.00

Video Interest Section Governing Rules

Important: PRINT or TYPE all information in BLACK INK

Report to Parliament. Gender Equity in Indian Registration Act

Canada s Response to the Special Rapporteur on the rights of Indigenous peoples

THE PROCESS OF A BILL IN ONTARIO

Transcription:

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED EX36.45 Police Reference Check Program - Establishment of Criminal Record and Judicial Matters Checks Process and Proposed Fee Date: June 26, 2018 To: From: Executive Committee, City of Toronto Andy Pringle, Chair, Toronto Police Services Board SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to advise the Executive Committee the establishment of a fee of $20.00 for the new Criminal Record and Judicial Matters Checks for the purpose of employment and volunteer opportunities. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the establishment of a fee of $20.00 for the new Criminal Record and Judicial Matters Checks for the purpose of employment and volunteer opportunities, effective November 1, 2018. FINANCIAL IMPACT There are no significant financial implications from the recommendations in this report. However, the Service will continue to monitor the current staffing level s ability to properly meet the volume of requests received for all three levels of checks, within the established time frames. ISSUE BACKGROUND At its meeting held on June 21, 2018 the Board was in receipt of a report dated May 24, 2018 from Chief of Police Mark Saunders regarding the Police Reference Check Program Establishment of Criminal Record and Judicial Matters Checks Process and Proposed Fee. COMMENTS The Board expressed concerns that charging a fee could potentially create a barrier to this service for some individuals. The Board inquired whether or not the TPS contemplated a sliding scale of fees. In response to the Board, Mr. Tony Veneziano, Chief Staff report for action on Police Reference Check Program Establishment of Criminal Record and Judicial Matters

Administrative Officer said that the TPS has not considered a sliding scale. However, the fee is based on cost recovery. Mr. Veneziano said that the TPS fee is consistent with the fee charged by other jurisdictions. The Board approved the foregoing report. CONCLUSION A copy of Board Minute No. P117/18, in the form attached as Appendix A, regarding this matter is provided for information. CONTACT Chief of Police Mark Saunders Toronto Police Service Telephone No. 416-808-8000 Fax No. 416-808-8002 SIGNATURE Andy Pringle Chair ATTACHMENT Appendix A Board Minute No. P117/18 Staff report for action on Police Reference Check Program Establishment of Criminal Record and Judicial Matters

APPENDIX A THIS IS AN EXTRACT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC MEETING OF THE TORONTO POLICE SERVICES BOARD HELD ON JUNE 21, 2018 #P117 POLICE REFERENCE CHECK PROGRAM - ESTABLISHMENT OF CRIMINAL RECORD AND JUDICIAL MATTERS CHECKS PROCESS AND PROPOSED FEE The Board was in receipt of the following report May 24, 2018 from Mark Saunders, Chief of Police: Subject: Police Reference Check Program - Establishment of Criminal Record and Judicial Matters Checks Process and Proposed Fee Recommendations: It is recommended that the Toronto Police Services Board (Board): (1) approve the establishment of a fee of $20.00 for the new Criminal Record and Judicial Matters Checks for the purpose of employment and volunteer opportunities, effective November 1, 2018; and (2) forward a copy of this report to the City of Toronto Executive Committee for its approval. Financial Implications: There are no significant financial implications from the recommendations in this report. However, the Service will continue to monitor the current staffing level s ability to properly meet the volume of requests received for all three levels of checks, within the established time frames. Background / Purpose: Bill 113, known as the Police Record Checks Reform Act (Act), passed third reading in the Ontario Legislature and subsequently received Royal Assent on December 3, 2015. On May 7, 2018, the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services distributed a general information memorandum to advise a proclamation date of November 1, 2018 for when the Act will come into force.

Prior to the passing of the Act, each police service had its own criteria and manner of handling the various types of police record check requests. The directives outlined in the Act establish a standardized approach to the broader police record check requirements across the province. The Act specifies both the manner in which an individual must request the check, and how the police record check provider must respond. A method to govern searches in policing databases is described within the Act relating to three different types of police record check requests. The types of record checks that police services must conduct under the Act are as follows: 1. Criminal Record Checks; 2. Criminal Record and Judicial Matters Checks; and 3. Vulnerable Sector Checks The Service s P.R.C.P. currently offers both Criminal Record Checks and Vulnerable Sector Checks to individuals, based on the established fees approved by the Board at its June 9, 2011 meeting (Min. No. P157/11 refers). The purpose of this report is to establish a fee for the new Criminal Record and Judicial Matters Check. Discussion: The Act requires all Police Services in Ontario to offer all three types of checks resulting in the Service introducing a secondary level of screening known as the Criminal Record and Judicial Matters Check. Each successive level of screening offers additional criminal record information. Both Level 1 - Criminal Record Checks and Level 2 - Criminal Record and Judicial Matters Checks disclose criminal convictions. Additionally, the Level 2 check includes a collection of outstanding court information such as warrants, charges and judicial orders. The Schedule to the Act outlines the type of information that is authorized for disclosure for each type of police record check. The impact this new level of screening will have on the demands for service is not fully known at this time. In order to help determine the impact on staffing resources required as a result of the new Level 2 check, Records Management Services (R.M.S.) undertook a time study to determine the average amount of time it would take to complete a Level 1 Criminal Record Check compared to a Level 2 Criminal Record and Judicial Matters Check. The results of the study showed a processing time difference of one minute between Level 1 and Level 2 checks. Based on the foregoing and the fact the total number of Level 1 and Level 2 checks are not expected to increase significantly, the Service is not asking for any additional positions at this time. Similar to Level 1 checks, the proposed fee for Level 2 checks will be set at $20.00.

R.M.S. will monitor the time being taken to complete the Criminal Record and Judicial Matters Check and the ability of the P.R.C.P. to complete the Level 1 and Level 2 requests. If at any time it is determined that additional staff are required to meet the demands of the secondary level of screening, the Board will be approached for the consideration of an increase in fees for the Level 2 Criminal Record and Judicial Matters Check, to cover the increased cost to provide the service. The Toronto Police Service proposed price list for the 3 levels of Record Checks; if approved will be: Type of Screening Employment Volunteer Criminal Record Check $20.00 $20.00 Criminal Record and Judicial $20.00 $20.00 Matters Check Vulnerable Sector Check $65.00 $20.00 (V.S.C.) V.S.C. Expedited Service $110.00 $65.00 The Royal Canadian Mounted Police mandates police services to perform Level 3 Vulnerable Sector Checks for residents within their respective jurisdiction only. A similar policy for Level 1 Criminal Record Checks and Level 2 Criminal Record and Judicial Matters Checks does not exist. Currently, police services have the discretion to provide Level 1 and Level 2 record check services to individuals outside of their respective municipal boundaries. The Service currently offers the Level 1 Criminal Record Check to any person making such a request, regardless their city of residence, and will apply the same service for Level 2 checks. Conclusion: The City of Toronto Act allows the Board to implement a fee to recover costs incurred to administer the provision of certain services. This report provides the Board with recommendations for the provision of records check services, specifically a fee for a newly established Criminal Record and Judicial Matter check. The recommendation is being made as a result of the newly enacted Bill 113, the Police Record Checks Reform Act, and requires City Council approval as well. The Service will perform a review of the current fees in 2019, including whether Level 1 and Level 2 checks should be restricted to City of Toronto residents only, and will report to the Board, as necessary. Mr. Tony Veneziano, Chief Administrative Officer, will be in attendance to answer any questions the Board may have regarding this report.

The Board expressed concerns that charging a fee could potentially create a barrier to this service for some individuals. The Board inquired whether or not the TPS contemplated a sliding scale of fees. In response to the Board, Mr. Tony Veneziano, Chief Administrative Officer said that the TPS has not considered a sliding scale. However, the fee is based on cost recovery. Mr. Veneziano said that the TPS fee is consistent with the fee charged by other jurisdictions. The Board approved the foregoing report. Moved by: Seconded by: J. Hart U. Chandrasekera