Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Similar documents
Case 2:15-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 1:14-cv JEI-KMW Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-50

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 123 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 842

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/27/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Case 6:18-cv ADA Document 26 Filed 01/11/19 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/29/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case 2:13-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 12/10/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 44 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 457

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this

Case 2:14-cv PMW Document 4 Filed 01/05/15 Page 1 of 20

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/06/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

Case 2:09-cv CE Document 1 Filed 12/22/09 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv RSM Document 1 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:16-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

Case 4:10-cv Y Document 23 Filed 04/21/10 Page 1 of 8 PageID 156

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 04/24/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/20/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-381 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/17 Page 1 of 24 PageID #: 1

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/01/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

cij;'l~jl NO~ AC..

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/07/16 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION INTEX RECREATION CORP.,

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv-3055

Case 3:16-cv N Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 3:12-cv-686

Transcription:

Case 2:14-cv-00945 Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION TRAXXAS LP v. Plaintiff, HOBBY PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. d/b/a HPI RACING Defendant. Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-945 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff Traxxas LP ( Plaintiff or Traxxas ) files this Original Complaint for Patent Infringement ( Complaint ) seeking injunctive and compensatory relief against Defendant Hobby Products International, Inc. d/b/a HPI Racing ( HPI or Defendant ) for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,315,040 (the 040 patent ). In support of its Complaint, Traxxas shows as follows: PARTIES 1. Traxxas, LP is a Texas-based company that designs, develops and sells hobbyclass remote-controlled vehicles. 2. Upon information and belief, HPI is a foreign corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California that does business in the State of Texas. Accordingly, HPI may be served with process by serving its registered agents, Tatsuro Watanabe and/or Shihomi Tezuka, at HPI s business address, having its principal place of business at 70 Icon Street, Foothill Ranch, California 92610, or wherever else they may be found, with citation attached, or by certified mail, return receipt requested. 1

Case 2:14-cv-00945 Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 2 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 101 et seq. This Court has original and exclusive jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a). 4. This Court has personal jurisdiction over HPI in that it has committed acts within Texas and the Eastern District of Texas giving rise to this action. As set forth in this Complaint, HPI has purposely transacted business involving its accused products in this judicial district by providing products for sale through online and hobby store distributors in the State of Texas and Eastern District of Texas that infringe the 040 patent. 5. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)-(c) and 1400(b), because Defendant has committed acts within this judicial district giving rise to this action and does business in this district. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 6. The 040 patent entitled Protective Enclosure for Model Vehicle was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on November 20, 2012, after full and fair examination. A copy of the 040 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 7. The 040 patent provides for a protective enclosure that may be configured for use in a remotely controllable model vehicle to protect a control module. 8. Traxxas has owned the 040 patent throughout the period of HPI s infringing acts and still owns the patent. Traxxas is the sole owner of all rights, title, and interest in the 040 patent, and possesses all rights of recovery, including the right to recover all past damages under the 040 patent. 2

Case 2:14-cv-00945 Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 3 9. On information and belief, HPI manufactures radio control cars, trucks, and monster trucks. It offers gas off-road, nitro off-road, electric off-road, nitro on-road, electric onroad, and precision diecast cars and trucks; and various parts and accessories, such as bodies, tires, wheels, motors and engines, option parts, gear parts, and various other parts. HPI also provides electric and nitro powered car and truck kits. HPI offers for sale and sells its products through a network of dealers in the United States. 10. Defendant HPI does business at the website www.hpiracing.com and its products can be purchased at hobby stores within the Eastern District of Texas. 11. HPI directly ships, distributes, offers for sale, sells, and advertises its infringing products and/or services in the United States, including within the State of Texas and the Eastern District of Texas. 12. Specifically, HPI directly ships, distributes, offers for sale, sells, and advertises protective enclosures, including those marketed as waterproof enclosures, that are identical to or substantially equivalent to the claims set forth in the 040 patent. 13. Upon information and belief, HPI has sold the infringing protective enclosures to customers located in the Eastern District of Texas. forth herein. CAUSES OF ACTION COUNT I INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT NO. 8,315,040 14. Traxxas realleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1-13 as if fully set 15. Defendant HPI has infringed, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, and continues to directly infringe one or more claims of the 040 patent by, among other things, making, manufacturing, importing, offering for sale, selling, and using protective enclosures that embody the patented invention in the 040 patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271. 3

Case 2:14-cv-00945 Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 4 16. HPI manufactures and sells remote control model vehicles, which include protective enclosures to protect the radio control receivers in such vehicles. Some of the protective enclosures manufactured and/or sold by HPI for use in its remote controllable vehicles infringe the 040 patent, either literally or by the doctrine of equivalents, are included in the following HPI products: a. Sprint 2 Flux; b. Blitz; c. Firestorm; d. Bullet Flux; e. Trophy Nitro; and f. Bullet Nitro. 17. Plaintiff s remedy by civil action for infringement is provided by 35 U.S.C. 281. 18. Prior to the filing of this action, Plaintiff complied with 35 U.S.C. 287 by placing a notice of the 040 patent on products it sells. 19. Traxxas has been damaged as a result of HPI s infringing conduct. HPI is, therefore, liable to Traxxas in an amount that adequately compensates it for HPI s infringements, which, by law, cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. 284. 20. Defendant s infringement of Patent 040 is willful and deliberate, making this case exceptional pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285 and justifying treble damages by 35 U.S.C. 284. 21. If it is determined that this case presents exceptional circumstances within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 285, Traxxas requests the Court to award it all reasonable attorneys fees and costs incurred in this litigation and pre-judgment and post-judgment interest pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 and 285. 4

Case 2:14-cv-00945 Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 5 JURY DEMAND 22. Plaintiff hereby requests a trial by jury pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Traxxas respectfully requests that this Court enter a judgment in its favor and against Defendant HPI as follows: 1. A permanent injunction against HPI, enjoining it, its respective directors, officers, agents, employees, successors, subsidiaries, assigns, and all persons acting in privity, concert, or participation with HPI, from making, using, selling, or offering for sale in the United States, or importing into the United States, any and all products and/or services embodying the patented inventions claimed in the 040 patent; 2. Damages for infringement of Traxxas 040 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 281 and 284; 3. Enhanced damages for willful infringement, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284; 4. Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest at the highest legal maximum rate; 5. Costs, expenses, and fees, including reasonable and necessary attorneys fees, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285; 6. Payment of costs of suit herein incurred pursuant to, inter alia, 35 U.S.C. 297(b)(1); 7. Other relief to which Plaintiff Traxxas may be entitled at law or in equity, whether pled or unpled. 5

Case 2:14-cv-00945 Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 6 Dated: October 10, 2014 Respectfully Submitted, By: /s/ William E. Davis, III William E. Davis, III Texas State Bar No. 24047416 THE DAVIS FIRM, PC 222 N. Fredonia Street Longview, Texas 75601 Telephone: (903) 230-9090 Facsimile: (903) 230-9661 Email: bdavis@bdavisfirm.com Of counsel L. David Anderson Attorney-In-Charge State Bar No. 00796126 Email: danderson@wickphillips.com R. Casey O Neill State Bar No. 24079077 Email: casey.oneill@wickphillips.com Rusty O Kane State Bar No. 24027443 Email: rusty.okane@wickphillips.com WICK PHILLIPS GOULD & MARTIN, LLP 3131 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75204 Telephone: (214) 692-6200 Facsimile: (214) 692-6255 and Scott L. Harper State Bar No. 00795038 Email: scott.harper@harperwasham.com HARPER WASHAM LLP 1700 Pacific Avenue, Suite 3600 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 389-8985 Facsimile: (214) 389-8986 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF TRAXXAS LP 6