International IP Rights Tips and Tricks International Trade-mark Applications

Similar documents
Japan Patent & Trademark Update

SCHEDULE OF MINIMUM CHARGES

OUTLINE OF TRADEMARK SYSTEM IN JAPAN

Litigation Strategies in Europe MIP Global IP & Innovation Summit

Madrid Easy. A rough and easy guide how international registrations designating the European Community will be processed by the OHIM

Annex 2 DEFINITIONS FOR TERMS AND FOR STATISTICS ON PROCEDURES

Vienna Agreement Establishing an International Classification of the Figurative Elements of Marks

LESSONS WE CAN LEARN FROM PRIOR USER RIGHTS IN JAPAN

Part 1 Current Status of Intellectual Property Rights

Madrid System Webinar Examination and Refusal Procedures before the IP Australia, as Designated Office

Roles and Obligations of a Member of the Madrid System

Law Introducing Rules for Localization of Personal Data of Russian Citizens

New Civil Code and Contracts What You Should Know

Patent Invalidation Defense v. Correction of Claims Counter-Assertion in Patent Infringement Litigation

MIP International Patent Forum 2013 Russia Focus

Sovereign Immunity. Key points for commercial parties July allenovery.com

AIPLA Overview of recent developments in Community trade mark law

Contributing firm Granrut Avocats

INTA :: International Opposition Guide. Search Preface How To Use This Resource Editors and Contributors FRANCE. Last updated: February 2017

TRADEMARK FILING REQUIREMENTS SINGAPORE

Restrictions-permissible number and timing of divisional applications

UPC Alert. March 2014 SPEED READ

Guide to WIPO Services

Failure to adhere to the above can result to the irrevocable lapsing of a patent application.

Pakistan. Contributing firm Khursheed Khan & Associates. Author Zulfiqar Khan. World Trade Organisation Agreement and the Paris Convention.

Notification Requirement for Foreign Audit Firms under the Revised Japanese CPA Law

Fee Schedule Intellectual Property Rights Trademarks, Designs

Are the CTM and the Benelux systems Harmonized?

New immigration law in Qatar legal update

Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks

Fact or Fiction? U.S. Government Surveillance in a Post-Snowden World

SEC Proposes Amendments to Require Use of Universal Proxy Cards in Contested Elections

MALAYSIA IP HANDBOOK

JOINT CIRCULAR ON DETAILING AND GUIDING MEASURES AGAINST CORPORATE NAMES THAT INFRINGE INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Where to Challenge Patents? International Post Grant Practice Strategic Considerations Before the USPTO, EPO, SIPO and JPO

Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Vietnam

Questions to be Addressed in Response to the Survey on the Lisbon System

PJLink Trademark and Logo Licensing Agreement

Madrid Agreement and Protocol Concerning the International Registration of Marks

France. Contributing firm Granrut Avocats. Authors Richard Milchior Partner Estelle Benattar Associate

Seminar for HKIS on: "Non-Payment and Termination of Contracts"

DECREE 11 NEW REGULATIONS ON WORK PERMITS

Risk and Return. Foreign Direct Investment and the Rule of Law. Briefing Note

BEST PRACTICES FOR EFFICIENT DOCKETING OF ROUTINE FORMALITIES: PART 1

INDONESIA IP HANDBOOK

GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION OF EUROPEAN UNION TRADE MARKS EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (EUIPO) PART E REGISTER OPERATIONS SECTION 2

Primary DNS Name : TOMCAT.ASAHI-NET.OR.JP Primary DNS IP: Secondary DNS Name: SKYHAWK.ASAHI-NET.OR.JP Secondary DNS IP:

APAA Country Report KOREA APAA Council Meeting Penang 2014

Patent Cooperation Treaty

ON TRADEMARKS LAW ON TRADEMARKS CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS

Regulation relating to payments etc. to the Norwegian Industrial Property Office and the Board of Appeal for Industrial Property Rights

Resolving IT Disputes by Arbitration

Intellectual Property High Court

2. PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROCEDURAL REGULATION ARTICLE

Supported by. A global guide for practitioners

OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English

Role of Bar Associations in the Globalization of JapaneseLawyers

Introduction of the Madrid Protocol

EEA and Swiss national. Children and their rights to British citizenship

Trademark registrations

The Madrid Agreement Concerning. the International Registration of Marks. and the Protocol Relating to that Agreement:

Patent Litigation in China & Amicus Curiae in the U.S. William (Skip) Fisher Partner, Shanghai. EPLAW Congress, 22 November 2013

February 25 26, 2019 Phnom Penh, Cambodia

Ref.: Standards ST.60 page: STANDARD ST.60 RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA RELATING TO MARKS

The Manual concerning proceedings before the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

PROTOCOL relating to the Madrid Agreement concerning the international registration of marks, adopted at Madrid on 27 June 1989

UK trade mark application opposition procedure

PATENT PROSECUTION HIGHWAY (PPH) A PILOT PROGRAM BETWEEN JPO AND VIETNAM S NOIP

MANAGING DIRECTOR S LETTER

Latham & Watkins Environment, Land & Resources Department

U.S. TRADEMARK PRACTICE. FICPI 12 th Open Forum September 10, 2010 Munich, Germany Gary D. Krugman, Sughrue Mion, PLLC Washington, DC

GLOSSARY of patent related terms in the IP5 STATISTICS REPORT 2015 EDITION

Constitution of The Petroleum Club of Western Australia

Executive Rules under the Uniform Benelux Law on Marks*

NORWAY Trade Marks Regulations Regulations no. 937 of June 25, 2010 Entry into force: July 1, 2010 Last changed: February 23, 2011

GLOSSARY of patent related terms in the IP5 STATISTICS REPORT 2016 EDITION

Damages United Kingdom perspective

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Working Group

News Letter Autumn 2015

patentees. Patent judgment rules in Japanese legal system In this part, to discuss the patent judgment rules in Japan legal system, we will discuss th

Domestic Foreign TOTAL Domestic Foreign TOTAL Appl. Granted Appl. Granted Appl. Granted Appl. Granted Appl. Granted Appl. Granted

Implementing Regulations of the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China

PATENT. Copyright Henry Goh & Co Sdn Bhd

Patents: Utility Models Overview of requirements, procedures and tactical use in Europe and Japan

Patent Act) I. Outline of the Case The plaintiff filed a request to the Japan Patent Office (JPO) for a trial for invalidation of Patent No e

Colombia. Information on the filing of Patents, Designs and Trademarks in Colombia. COMANAS CORP IP Management Service Group

ACCESSION KIT: THE MADRID SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS

Users Guide to the Automated Gates (For Foreign Nationals)

EU-China Workshop on Trademark Law

1. The Japan Patent Office (JPO) fee schedule is changed, effective from. 2. The post-grant opposition system is abolished, and the invalidation trial

Possible models for the UK/EU relationship

Over the past two years, we have. A case study in declarations of non-infringement NON- INFRINGEMENT DECLARATIONS

The Opt-Out: Actions You Need to Take

OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF THE PROVISIONAL INSTITUTIONS OF SELF-GOVERNMENT IN KOSOVO / PRISHTINA: YEAR II / NO. 14 / 01 JULY 2007 Law No.

PROVISIONAL INSTITUTIONS OF SELF GOVERNMENT ON TRADEMARKS

Regulations for the Implementation of Trademark Law (2010)

LAWSON & PERSSON, P.C.

Decade History and Future Prospects of Intellectual Property High Court Chief Judge of the Intellectual Property High Court Shitara, Ryuichi

In this Issue. Dec 2015 Vol. 15. IP Update. Jiaquan IP Law Firm. Chinese C919 Airliner is Rolled-out. 1. IP Update

Working Group on the Development of the Lisbon System (Appellations of Origin)

Transcription:

International IP Rights Tips and Tricks International Trade-mark Applications FICPI 17th Open Forum Venice, Italy, October 27, 2017 Shunji SATO, Partner / Trademark Attorney TMI Associates, Japan 1

Japan Number of Trademark Applications Source : JPO Status Report 2017 https://www.jpo.go.jp/shiryou/toukei/pdf/status2017/all.pdf 2

Japan Number of Trademark Applications by Country of Origin of Applicant Source : JPO Status Report 2017 https://www.jpo.go.jp/shiryou/toukei/pdf/status2017/all.pdf 3

Japan Number of Trademark Applications by Country of Origin of Applicant Source : JPO Status Report 2017 https://www.jpo.go.jp/shiryou/toukei/pdf/status2017/all.pdf 4

Japan 5 th Most designated Madrid member Madrid Yearly Review 2017 http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_940_2017.pdf 5

Japan Subsequent Designations Madrid Yearly Review 2017 http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_940_2017.pdf 6

Japan 3 rd Biggest issuer of Provisional Refusals Madrid Yearly Review 2017 http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_940_2017.pdf 7

When receiving a Provisional Refusal from the JPO Submit an original Power of Attorney to the JPO Original Power of Attorney can be filed later Deadline to respond to a Provisional Refusal (PR) 3 months from the date the PR is issued by the JPO or the WIPO 3 months from the date of pronouncement of the Notification of PR 3 months from the date of receipt of the PR notification by the Applicant Extension of time - Possible even after the deadline expires One-month extension if a request is filed before the expiration Two-month extension if a request is filed after the expiration 8

When receiving a Provisional Refusal from the JPO 3 months from the date of pronouncement 2017/9/8 9

Provisional Refusal - Earlier trademarks There exists - 1 identical prior mark in Class 3 and - 2 similar prior marks in Class 44 (1) bad faith filing for an identical trademark; (2) similar trademarks likely to be solved with a Letter of Consent; (3) earlier trademarks owned by the same applicant but the name/address are written differently Partial provisional refusals cannot be issued in Japan 10

Provisional Refusal - Earlier trademarks (1) Bad faith application for an identical trademark Opposition Invalidation Action Non-use Cancellation Action Third Party Observation Grounds Lack of Intent to Use Likelihood of Confusion Bad Faith 11

Provisional Refusal - Earlier trademarks (2) Similar trademarks likely to be solved with a Letter of Consent In general, Letters of Consent are NOT accepted in Japan A worldwide co-existence agreement will be insufficient in itself Accepted only between parent company and subsidiary since April 2017 Co-existence by way of an Assign-back arrangement The later trademark applicant temporarily assigns its pending application to the prior trademark owner. Once the pending application is under the same ownership, the ground for refusal is resolved and the Examiner will grant a decision of registration. After the pending application has been registered at the JPO, the trademark will then be assigned back to the original applicant (the requesting party). 12

Provisional Refusal - Earlier trademarks (3) Earlier trademarks owned by the same applicant but the name/address are written differently The JPO strictly examines the identity of both entities and requires both the names and addresses thereof to be identical Citation cannot be overcome by only filing an Argument Requires recordal procedures for the change of name/address Earlier trademark s Name Address Must Be IDENTICAL Later trademark s Name Address 13

Second part of the individual fees - Only Japan and Cuba 14

Thank you! Shunji SATO Partner, Trademark / Design Attorney TMI Associates 23rd & 24th Floors, Roppongi Hills Mori Tower 6-10-1 Roppongi Minato-ku Tokyo 106-6123 JAPAN TEL +81(0)3-6438-5611 FAX +81(0)3-6438-5622 E-mail: ssato@tmi.gr.jp http://www.tmi.gr.jp/english TOKYO NAGOYA KOBE SHANGHAI BEIJING HO CHI MINH CITY HANOI SINGAPORE YANGON PHNOM PENH SILICON VALLEY 15