AMENDMENT NO.llll Purpose: To provide a complete substitute. S. 787

Similar documents
S th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 787 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES. April 2, 2009

Legislative Approaches to Defining Waters of the United States

SUBJECT: Supreme Court Ruling Concerning CWA Jurisdiction over Isolated Waters

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY DIVISION WILMINGTON DISTRICT

40 CFR Parts 110, 112, 116, 117, 122, 230, 232, 300, 302, and 401. Definition of Waters of the United States Recodification of Pre-existing Rules

Question: Does the Clean Water Act prohibit filling wetlands that are 15 miles away from any navigable water?

OVERVIEW OF AUTHORITIES AND JURISDICTION

Case 1:15-cv IMK Document 32 Filed 08/26/15 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 514

What To Know About The 'Waters Of The United States' Rule

Navajo Nation Surface Water Quality Standards Certification Regulations

The Impact of Recent Supreme Court Decisions on Federal Jurisdiction of Streams. Gary E. Freeman 1 F. ASCE PhD, PE, D.WRE

AMENDMENT NO.llll Purpose: To provide a complete substitute. Calendar No.lll S. 2229

Waters of the U.S. ( WOTUS ) Li6ga6on and Rule Update

Waters of the United States (WOTUS): Current Status of the 2015 Clean Water Rule

WATERS OF THE U.S. AFTER SWANCC

Environmental & Energy Advisory

Water Quality Issues in the 112 th Congress: Oversight and Implementation

ELR. In Rapanos v. United States, 1 the U.S. Supreme Court issued NEWS&ANALYSIS

Not a Mirage: Most Ephemeral and Intermittent Streams in Arid Environments Would be Subject to Federal Agency Permits under Proposed Rules

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 114th Cong., 2d Sess. S. 1878

Fordham Environmental Law Review

Ecology Law Quarterly

Supreme Court of the United States

Wetlands: An Overview of Issues

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 114th Cong., 1st Sess. S. 1814

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 115th Cong., 2d Sess. S. 974

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

Case 2:08-cv EJL Document 97 Filed 04/24/15 Page 1 of 12

33 CFR PART 329 DEFINITION OF NAVIGABLE WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES. Authority: 33 U.S.C. 401 et seq.

IMPLEMENTING RAPANOS WILL JUSTICE KENNEDY S SIGNIFICANT NEXUS TEST PROVIDE A WORKABLE STANDARD FOR LOWER COURTS, REGULATORS, AND DEVELOPERS?

Federal Regulation of Isolated Wetlands: To Be or Not to Be

The Judicial Assault on the Clean Water Act

Office of the General Counsel Monthly Activity Report May 2015

Ecology Law Quarterly

S. ll. To limit the application of Federal laws to the distribution and consumption of marihuana, and for other purposes.

E N V I R O N M E N T A L P R O T E C T I O N N E T W O R K. EPN Comments on Proposed Repeal of the Rule Defining the Waters of the United States

4 Sec. 102 FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT

PUBLIC LAW NOV. 16, An Act SHORT TITLE FINDINGS

COMMENTS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF STATE WETLAND MANAGERS TO THE

CRS Report for Congress

Now Open for Development: The Present State of Regulation of Activities in North Carolina Wetlands

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL DECISION FILE NO (JF-DHB) JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT. October 18, 2002

Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, 129 S. Ct (U.S. 2009).

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 114th Cong., 1st Sess. H. R. 2051

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 115th Cong., 1st Sess. H. R. 3210

The Bright Line of Rapanos: Analyzing the Plurality's Two-Part Test

"Waters of the U.S." Rule After South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. Pruitt

Current as of December 17, 2015

Plain Meaning, Precedent, and Metaphysics: Interpreting the Navigable Waters Element of the Federal Water Pollution Offense

EPA AND ARMY CORPS RELEASE NEW CLEAN WATER ACT RULE INTERPRETING AND EXPANDING JURISDICTION

The Wetlands Coverage of the Clean Water Act (CWA): Rapanos and Beyond

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Groundwater Jurisdiction Under the Clean Water Act: The Tributary Groundwater Dilemma

LII / Legal Information Institute

EPA S UNPRECEDENTED EXERCISE OF AUTHORITY UNDER CLEAN WATER ACT SECTION 404(C)

August 13, In the Supplemental Notice, EPA and the Corps request comment on:

Oct. 28, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C Washington, DC 20460

Clean Water Act Jurisdiction: Submitting Requests for Jurisdictional Determinations and Wetland Delineation Approvals/Verification

Brief for the Appellee, Goldthumb Mining Co., Inc.: Fifteenth Annual Pace National Environmental Moot Court Competition

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection & Restoration Act Public Law , Title III (abbreviated summary of the Act, not part of the Act)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

SWANCC: Full of Sound and Fury, Signifying Nothing Much?, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev (2004)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION NO. 7:13-CV-200-FL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 113th Cong., 2d Sess. H. R. 1232

EPA and the Army Corps Waters of the United States Rule: Congressional Response and Options

Calendar No.lll Purpose: To authorize parity for defense and nondefense spending pursuant to the Bipartisan Budget Act of S.

The Waters of the United States Rule: Legislative Options and 114 th Congress Responses

Case 1:13-cv KBJ Document 49 Filed 11/13/13 Page 1 of 60 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. Among

TITLE VIII PRIVACY PROTECTIONS Subtitle A Video Privacy Protection

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA BRUNSWICK DIVISION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

The Plurality Paradox: Rapanos v. U.S. and the Uncertain Future of Federal Wetlands Protection

Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972

1824 Gibbons vs. Ogden. The Supreme Court clearly arms the principle that commerce" for purposes of the Commerce Clause includes navigation.

COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY & WOTUS RULES UPDATES. Henry s Fork Watershed Council Jerry R. Rigby Rigby, Andrus & Rigby Law, PLLC

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 111th Cong., 1st Sess. S. 1692

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION

The Federal Commerce and Navigation Powers: Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County's Undecided Constitutional Issue

October 15, RE: Docket ID No. EPA HQ OW Definition of Waters of the United States Under the Clean Water Act

Case 2:17-cv CM-JPO Document 1 Filed 01/18/17 Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

40 CFR Parts 110, 112, 116, 117, 122, 230, 232, 300, 302, and 401. Definition of Waters of the United States Amendment of Effective Date of 2015 Clean

The Murky Future of the Clean Water Act after SWANCC: Using a Hydrological Connection Approach to Saving the Clean Water Act

SUMMARY OF POST-RAPANOS AND POST-SWANCC COURT DECISIONS. October 2007

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 115th Cong., 1st Sess. H. R. 2810

NORTH CAROLINA LAW REVIEW

SOUTHBOROUGH WETLANDS BY-LAW First Draft 1/2/92, (last revised 2/22/95) Approved at Annual Town Meeting of April 10, 1995 (Article #48)

Wetlands in the Courts: Recent Cases

Purpose: To amend the District of Columbia Student Opportunity Scholarship Act of 2003.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 111th Cong., 2d Sess. S. 3728

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Water Quality Issues in the 114 th Congress: An Overview

Article 7. Department of Environmental Quality. Part 1. General Provisions.

2017 ASSEMBLY BILL 547

Journal of Environmental and Sustainability Law

Enemy of the People: The Need for Congress to Pass the Clean Water Restoration Act

Transcription:

O:\DEC\DEC0.xml DISCUSSION DRAFT S.L.C. AMENDMENT NO.llll Purpose: To provide a complete substitute. Calendar No.lll IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES th Cong., st Sess. S. To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to clarify the jurisdiction of the United States over waters of the United States. Referred to the Committee on llllllllll and ordered to be printed Ordered to lie on the table and to be printed AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE intended to be proposed by llllllllll Viz: Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the following: SECTION. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the Clean Water Restoration Act. SEC.. PURPOSES. The purposes of this Act are () to reaffirm the original intent of Congress in enacting the Federal Water Pollution Control Act

O:\DEC\DEC0.xml DISCUSSION DRAFT S.L.C. 0 0 Amendments of (Public Law 00; Stat. ) to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the waters of the United States; and () to clearly define the waters of the United States that are subject to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ( U.S.C. et seq.) as those features that were treated as such on January, 00, pursuant to the final rule (including the preamble to that final rule) published at Fed. Reg. 0 (November, ), as in effect on January, 00. SEC.. FINDING. Section 0 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ( U.S.C. ) is amended by adding at the end the following: (h) FINDINGS. Congress finds that () the ruling of the United States Supreme Court in Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. (January, 00) and Rapanos v. United States, U.S. (June, 00), adopted an overly constrained interpretation of the intent of Congress with respect to the scope of jurisdiction of this Act; and

O:\DEC\DEC0.xml DISCUSSION DRAFT S.L.C. 0 0 () the intent of Congress is more closely reflected by the regulatory definition of the term waters of the United States under the final rule (including the preamble to that final rule) published at Fed. Reg. 0 (November, ), as in effect on January, 00.. SEC.. DEFINITION OF WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES. Section 0 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ( U.S.C. ) is amended () by striking paragraph (); () by redesignating paragraphs () through () as paragraphs () through (), respectively; and () by adding at the end the following: () WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES. (A) IN GENERAL. The term waters of the United States means (i) all waters which are currently used, were used in the past, or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide; (ii) all interstate waters including interstate wetlands;

O:\DEC\DEC0.xml DISCUSSION DRAFT S.L.C. 0 0 (iii) all other waters, such as intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds, the use, degradation, or destruction of which would or could affect interstate or foreign commerce, including any such waters (I) which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes; (II) from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce; or (III) which are used or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce; (iv) all impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the United States under this definition; (v) tributaries of waters identified in clauses (i) through (iv) of this definition; (vi) the territorial sea; and

O:\DEC\DEC0.xml DISCUSSION DRAFT S.L.C. 0 0 (vii) wetlands adjacent to waters (other than waters that are themselves wetlands) identified in clauses (i) through (vi) of this definition. (B) WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS. Waste treatment systems, including treatment ponds or lagoons designed to meet the requirements of this Act (other than cooling ponds as defined in section.(m) of title 0, Code of Federal Regulations, which also meet the criteria of this definition) are not waters of the United States. This exclusion applies only to manmade bodies of water which neither were originally created in waters of the United States (such as disposal area in wetlands) nor resulted from the impoundment of waters of the United States. (C) PRIOR CONVERTED CROPLAND. Waters of the United States do not include prior converted cropland. Notwithstanding the determination of an area s status as prior converted cropland by any other federal agency, for the purposes of this Act, the final authority regarding jurisdiction under this Act remains with the Environmental Protection Agency..

O:\DEC\DEC0.xml DISCUSSION DRAFT S.L.C. 0 0 SEC.. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS. The Federal Water Pollution Control Act ( U.S.C. et seq.) is amended () by striking navigable waters of the United States each place it appears and inserting waters of the United States ; () in section 0(l)() by striking NAVIGABLE WATERS in the heading and inserting WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES ; and () by striking navigable waters each place it appears and inserting waters of the United States. SEC.. SAVINGS CLAUSE. Nothing in this Act (or an amendment made by this Act) affects the applicability of the following provisions of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act: () Section 0(l)() ( U.S.C. (l)()). () Section 0(l)() ( U.S.C. (l)()). () Section 0(f)()(A) ( U.S.C. (f)()(a)). () Section 0(f)()(B) ( U.S.C. (f)()(b)). () Section 0(f)()(C) ( U.S.C. (f)()(c)). () Section 0(f)()(D) ( U.S.C. (f)()(d)).

O:\DEC\DEC0.xml DISCUSSION DRAFT S.L.C. 0 () Section 0(f)()(E) ( U.S.C. (f)()(e)). () Section 0(f)()(F) ( U.S.C. (f)()(f)). SEC.. REGULATIONS. Not later than 0 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Secretary of the Army shall promulgate such regulations as are necessary to implement this Act and the amendments made by this Act.