Case: 1:12-cv CAB Doc #: 4 Filed: 07/31/12 1 of 8. PageID #: 84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO.

Similar documents
Case 1:14-cv CRC Document 222 Filed 10/03/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:03-cv LJM-TAB Document 745 Filed 05/22/07 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 8174

Case 3:18-cv L Document 6-5 Filed 07/03/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID 97 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv ER Document 71 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 13

Case 3:16-cv EMC Document 311 Filed 02/12/18 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:18-cv AJN Document 6 Filed 09/29/18 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:11-cv RJS Document 267 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 11

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ingles Markets, Inc. Doc. 6 Case 1:06-cv LHT-DLH Document 6 Filed 04/28/2006 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:15-cv GMN-PAL Document 62 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:15-cv JMS-MJD Document 177 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 891

USDCSDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#:,---.- DATE FILED: 1 / j {2.~> is

Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 1:18-cv ER Document 72 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:05-cv MSK -CBS Document 843 Filed 01/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv Document 2-1 Filed 12/20/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Defendant.

Case 1:14-cv CRC Document 238 Filed 03/08/19 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 26 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 543

: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, : : 01 Civ (BSJ) Plaintiff, : : : v. : PARTIAL FINAL : JUDGMENT AND

Case 4:15-cv DLH-CSM Document 5 Filed 05/05/15 Page 1 of 11

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 8-1 Filed: 09/06/17 Page 397 of 420 PageID #:481

Case 2:09-cv JP Document Filed 11/29/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:08-cv RJL Document 3 Filed 12/15/2008 Page 1 of 38

Case 3:18-cv M Document 62 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1084

Case 1:10-cv RJL Document 3-1 Filed 03/22/10 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:09-cv N Document 5 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 7 ORIGINAL

Case 3:11-cv JBA Document 200 Filed 05/13/11 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. CONSENT OF DEFENDANT SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

Case 3:09-cv N Document 8 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 10 U.S. DISTRICT COURT :NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FILED ---'-----,

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :59 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 58 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016 EXHIBIT 8

Case 2:16-cv JAR-JPO Document 69 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No.: Plaintiff, Defendants

Case 1:18-cv TNM Document 14 Filed 03/04/19 Page 1 of 20

Case 1:18-cv RWZ Document 53-1 Filed 04/05/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. CASE No.: COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No.

Case 1:15-cv BAH Document 1 Filed 03/03/15 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Sec. 202(a)(1)(C). Disclosure of Negative Risk Determinations about Financial Company.

Case 1:19-cv DLC Document 1 Filed 01/03/19 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, I COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv CCC-JBC Document 1 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

PRIVATE PLACEMENT AGREEMENT. relating to

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. Case No.:

muia'aiena ED) wnrn 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EBERHARD SCHONEBURG, ) SECURITIES LAWS

PURCHASE CONTRACT , 2015

C V CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ) ) ) Case No. ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) ) ) ) Plaintiff,

$ CITY OF ALBANY (Alameda County, California) 2016 General Obligation Refunding Bonds BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT

Case 2:10-cv PA -PJW Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:10

Case 2:12-cv KJM-EFB Document 40 Filed 01/14/13 Page 1 of 21

Case 1:19-cv Document 3 Filed 01/16/19 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.

Case 2:06-cv RSM Document 30 Filed 05/04/2006 Page 1 of 6

$ OHLONE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT (Alameda County, California) Election of 2010 General Obligation Bonds, Series B PURCHASE CONTRACT, 2014

Case 3:11-cv K Document 72 Filed 06/25/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID 676

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

- 1 - Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. 2:17-cv-4720

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEV ADA. consented to the entry of this Consent Decree of Permanent Injunction (the "Decree"), without

STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION, CIVIL MONEY PENALTIES, AND OTHER RELIEF

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/13/15 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants.

CFTC Adopts Final Anti-Manipulation and Anti-Fraud Rules & Begins Final Rulemaking Phase Implementing Dodd-Frank

DISTRICT COURT, DENVER COUNTY, COLORADO Bannock Street Denver, CO GERALD ROME, Securities Commissioner for the State of Colorado,

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/11/16 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

2016-CFPB-0017 Document 26 Filed 01/30/2017 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

Case 2:11-cv BSJ Document 358 Filed 06/06/14 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH I.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case Number: CIV-MARTINEZ-GOODMAN DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS YOUR YELLOW PAGES. INC., CITY PAGES. INC..

Case: 3:14-cv wmc Document #: 404 Filed: 06/21/17 Page 1 of 15

ALABAMA SECURITIES COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 830-X-6 EXEMPT SECURITIES AND EXEMPT TRANSACTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ALAN GRABISCH, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,

REMARKETING AGREEMENT

Case 2:16-cv JNP Document 8 Filed 07/26/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

3. \5"'- C (-- ~ '3-1JJ-t\ 18 U.S.C. 981(a)(l)(C) 18 U.S.C. 981(a)(2) 18 U.S.C U.S.C. 2461

11? "76WiA, y01\v7-aikt ' DAVID DE

$201,450,000 CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SALES TAX REVENUE BONDS (LIMITED TAX REFUNDING BONDS) SERIES 2012A BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT

8:11-cv LSC -TDT Doc # 8 Filed: 08/16/11 Page 1 of 23 - Page ID # 16

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION -

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/07/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants

Case bjh11 Doc 957 Filed 04/16/19 Entered 04/16/19 14:24:44 Page 1 of 12

Sec. 9 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FORWARD DELIVERY BOND PURCHASE CONTRACT, Utility System Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. -Civ- Case No. Defendants, ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. 18 u.s.c. 981, 982, 1001, 1014 I 1028A, 1343, 1503 I 1519, 1957 and 2; 28 u. s.c.

Transcription:

Case: 1:12-cv-01954-CAB Doc #: 4 Filed: 07/31/12 1 of 8. PageID #: 84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, MICHAEL A. BODANZA and PREFERRED FINANCIAL HOLDINGS CO., LLC, and v. Civil Action No. Defendants, PREFERRED DRILLING CO., LLC, PREFERRED FINANCIAL INVESTMENT CO., LLC, PREFERRED FINANCIAL LEASING CO., LLC, AND PREFERRED WELL MANAGEMENT CO., LLC, Relief Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT MICHAEL A. BODANZA The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant Michael A. Bodanza ( Defendant ) having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to jurisdiction); waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment:

Case: 1:12-cv-01954-CAB Doc #: 4 Filed: 07/31/12 2 of 8. PageID #: 85 I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant and Defendant s agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act ) [15 U.S.C. 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (17 C.F.R. 240.10b-5), by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a) (b) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. II. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant and Defendant s agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act ) [15 U.S.C. 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly: 2

Case: 1:12-cv-01954-CAB Doc #: 4 Filed: 07/31/12 3 of 8. PageID #: 86 (a) (b) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser. III. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant and Defendant s agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 5 of the Securities Act (15 U.S.C. 77e) by, directly or indirectly, in the absence of any applicable exemption: (a) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to sell such security through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise; (b) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, carrying or causing to be carried through the mails or in interstate commerce, by any means or instruments of transportation, any such security for the purpose of sale or for delivery after sale; or (c) Making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or offer to buy through the use 3

Case: 1:12-cv-01954-CAB Doc #: 4 Filed: 07/31/12 4 of 8. PageID #: 87 or medium of any prospectus or otherwise any security, unless a registration statement has been filed with the Commission as to such security, or while the registration statement is the subject of a refusal order or stop order or (prior to the effective date of the registration statement) any public proceeding or examination under Section 8 of the Securities Act (15 U.S.C. 77h). IV. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable for disgorgement of $359,656, representing profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $50,551, for a total of $410,207. Based on Defendant s sworn representations in his Statement of Financial Condition dated March 1, 2012, and other documents and information submitted to the Commission, however, the Court is not ordering Defendant to pay a civil penalty, payment of all but $154,000 of the disgorgement is waived, and prejudgment interest is waived. Defendant shall satisfy this obligation by paying $154,000 to the Securities and Exchange Commission within pursuant to the terms of the payment schedule set forth in Paragraph V below. The determination not to impose a civil penalty, to waive payment of all but $154,000 of the disgorgement, and to waive payment of the prejudgment interest is contingent upon the accuracy and completeness of Defendant s Statement of Financial Condition. If at any time following the entry of this Final Judgment the Commission obtains information indicating that Defendant s representations to the Commission concerning his assets, income, liabilities, or net worth were fraudulent, misleading, inaccurate, or incomplete in any material respect as of the time such representations were made, the Commission may, at its sole discretion and without prior notice to Defendant, petition the Court for an order requiring Defendant to pay the unpaid 4

Case: 1:12-cv-01954-CAB Doc #: 4 Filed: 07/31/12 5 of 8. PageID #: 88 portion of the disgorgement, prejudgment and post-judgment interest thereon, and the maximum civil penalty allowable under the law. In connection with any such petition, the only issue shall be whether the financial information provided by Defendant was fraudulent, misleading, inaccurate, or incomplete in any material respect as of the time such representations were made. In its petition, the Commission may move this Court to consider all available remedies, including, but not limited to, ordering Defendant to pay funds or assets, directing the forfeiture of any assets, or sanctions for contempt of this Final Judgment. The Commission may also request additional discovery. Defendant may not, by way of defense to such petition: (1) challenge the validity of the Consent or this Final Judgment; (2) contest the allegations in the Complaint filed by the Commission; (3) assert that payment of disgorgement, prejudgment and post-judgment interest or a civil penalty should not be ordered; (4) contest the amount of disgorgement and prejudgment and post-judgment interest; (5) contest the imposition of the maximum civil penalty allowable under the law; or (6) assert any defense to liability or remedy, including, but not limited to, any statute of limitations defense. Defendant shall also pay post-judgment interest on any delinquent amounts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1961. V. Defendant shall pay the total of disgorgement due of $154,000 in thirteen installments to the Commission according to the following schedule: (1) $10,000, within fourteen days of entry of this Final Judgment; (2) $12,000, on or before September 30, 2012; (3) $12,000, on or before December 31, 2012; (4) $12,000, on or before March 31, 2013; (5) $12,000, on or before June 30, 2013; (6) $12,000, on or before September 30, 2013; (7) $12,000, on or before December 31, 2013; (8) $12,000, on or before March 31, 2014; (9) $12,000, on or before June 30, 2014; (10) $12,000, on or before September 30, 2014; (11) $12,000, on or before 5

Case: 1:12-cv-01954-CAB Doc #: 4 Filed: 07/31/12 6 of 8. PageID #: 89 December 31, 2014; (12) $12,000, on or before March 31, 2015; and (13) $12,000, on or before June 30, 2015. Defendant may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will provide detailed ACH transfer/fedwire instructions upon request. Payment may also be made directly from a bank account via Pay.gov through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm. Defendant may also pay by certified check, bank cashier s check, or United States postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to Enterprise Services Center Accounts Receivable Branch 6500 South MacArthur Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73169 and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title, civil action number, and name of this Court; Michael A. Bodanza as a defendant in this action; and specifying that payment is made pursuant to this Final Judgment. Defendant shall simultaneously transmit photocopies of evidence of payment and case identifying information to the Commission s counsel in this action. By making this payment, Defendant relinquishes all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in such funds and no part of the funds shall be returned to Defendant. The Commission shall hold the funds (collectively, the Fund ) and may propose a plan to distribute the Fund subject to the Court s approval. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the administration of any distribution of the Fund. If the Commission staff determines that the Fund will not be distributed, the Commission shall send the funds paid pursuant to this Final Judgment to the United States Treasury. 6

Case: 1:12-cv-01954-CAB Doc #: 4 Filed: 07/31/12 7 of 8. PageID #: 90 The Commission may enforce the Court s judgment for disgorgement and prejudgment interest by moving for civil contempt (and/or through other collection procedures authorized by law) at any time after fourteen days following entry of this Final Judgment. Defendant shall pay post-judgment interest on any delinquent amounts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1961. Payments shall be deemed made on the date they are received by the Commission and shall be applied first to post-judgment interest, which accrues pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1961 on any unpaid amounts due after fourteen days of the entry of Final Judgment. Prior to making the final payment set forth herein, Defendant shall contact the staff of the Commission for the amount due for the final payment. If Defendant fails to make any payment by the date agreed and/or in the amount agreed according to the schedule set forth above, all outstanding payments under this Final Judgment, including post-judgment interest, minus any payments made, shall become due and payable immediately at the discretion of the staff of the Commission without further application to the Court. VI. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. 7

Case: 1:12-cv-01954-CAB Doc #: 4 Filed: 07/31/12 8 of 8. PageID #: 91 VII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. Dated:, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8