DTM LOCATION ASSESSMENT

Similar documents
DTM Returnee Assessment IOM Iraq, March 2016

DTM Integrated Location Assessment III IOM Iraq, March 2018

Governorate Statistics 8,306 families (est. 49,836 individuals) 50,465 families (est. 302,790 individuals) 5,483 families (est 32,898 individuals)

150, ,958. Displacement Tracking Matrix. 694,220 Families 1,802, ,472 4,165,320. december ,446. individuals. Individuals.

IRAQ DISPLACEMENT 2006 YEAR IN REVIEW

IDP Working Group. Internally Displaced Persons in Iraq. Update (June 2008)

IRAQ. October 2007 Bulletin No. 2. Expanded Humanitarian Response Fund (ERF) NGO Micro Grant. I. Operational Updates. Basic Facts

Intentions Survey Round II - National IDP Camps

2.8 million internally displaced Iraqis struggle for adequate shelter, food, employment, and basic services.

NINEWA governorate PROFILE MAY 2015

2014/2015 IRAQ HUMANITARIAN NEEDS OVERVIEW. OCHA/Iason Athanasiadis

SulAYMANIYAH GOvERNORATE PROFIlE MAY 2015

KIRKuK GOVeRNORATe PROFIle JuNe 2015

IRAQ UNHCR IDP OPERATIONAL UPDATE December 2014 HIGHLIGHTS. Population of concern

DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX

International Organization for Migration (IOM) Iraq Mission Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM)

DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX

IRAQ UNHCR IDP OPERATIONAL UPDATE November 2014 HIGHLIGHTS

IRAQ Displacement in Southern Governorates

RETURN INTENTION SURVEY

Rapid Needs Assessment (RNA) of Recently Displaced Persons in the Kurdistan Region

GOVERNORATE PROFILE: NINEWA ,933 IDPs 3 95,200 returnees million total. Key Findings:

+4% -0.1% DTM ROUND 68 HIGHLIGHTS. IDPs. Returnees DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX. March ,058,626. 1,639,584 Individuals. 509,771 Families 273,264

DTM ROUND 106 DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX. Returnees 1,866, ,099 4,113,624 1,568 3,263 OCTOBER 2018 HIGHLIGHTS. Districts.

DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX

+6% +0.2% DTM ROUND 70 HIGHLIGHTS. IDPs. Returnees DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX. April ,065,112. 1,737,138 Individuals

Rapid Needs Assessment (RNA) of Recently-Displaced Persons in the Kurdistan Region

Iraq. UNICEF Cluster Target Result Target Result 1,952, ,784 2,372, ,584 86,000 43,632 45,000 48, ,000 26, ,000 38,795

DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX

OFFICE OF THE HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR FOR IRAQ HUMANITARIAN SITUATION REPORT NUMBER 18 7 April 2003

IOM EMERGENCY NEEDS ASSESSMENTS

Rapid Needs Assessment (RNA) of Recently Displaced Persons in the Kurdistan Region

25 September 2014 Prepared on behalf of the Humanitarian Country Team 1 KEY HUMANITARIAN ISSUES

ONGOING DISPLACEMENT A PROFILE OF IRAQ

1.2million Internally displaced (estimated)

Highlights. Situation Overview. Iraq CRISIS Situation Report No. 31 (7 13 February 2015) ISIL seizes large parts of al-baghdadi

Highlights. Situation Overview. Iraq CRISIS. Situation Report No. 15 (4 October 10 October 2014)

2014/2015 IRAQ STRATEGIC RESPONSE PLAN

The Effects of Terrorism on Labor Market Case Study of Iraq

IRAQ UNHCR IDP OPERATIONAL UPDATE

DTM ROUND 104 DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX. Returnees 1,890, ,116 4,075,350 1,539 3,289 SEPTEMBER 2018 HIGHLIGHTS. Districts.

IRAQ CCCM CLUSTER RESPONSE STRATEGY

Highlights. Situation Overview. Iraq IDP CRISIS Situation Report No. 11 (6 September 12 September 2014)

Iraq IDP Crisis Overview, 3-18 August 2014

SAUDI HUMANITARIAN FUND FOR IRAQ. First Progress Report

+15% -1% DTM ROUND 82 HIGHLIGHTS DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX. IDPs. Returnees 3,173,088. 2,624,430 Individuals. 528,848 Families 437,405

Displacement Tracking Matrix DTM Report # 3 March Burundi

UNHCR THEMATIC UPDATE

IRAQ UNHCR IDP OPERATIONAL UPDATE

THO PANEL DISCUSSION ON THE KRG INDEPENDENCE REFERENDUM AND REGIONAL REALITIES Wednesday, October 18 National Press Club, Washington, DC

NEWS BULLETIN August 1, 2014

Focus on conflict-affected groups in Ninewa, Diyala, and Sulaymaniyah Locations. 37 average age of respondents households surveyed

EMN Ad-Hoc Query on Policies regarding asylum seekers from Iraq Protection

Children play around open sewage, waste, and stagnant waters in Adhamiya, one of the biggest informal settlements in Baghdad.

In Erbil Governorate, the installation of caravans has been completed at the Ainkawa II Camp. The camp has a

MALAWI FLOOD RESPONSE Displacement Tracking Matrix Round III Report May 2015

Hawija District Report

UNICEF IRAQ Iraq Humanitarian

Masque of Democracy: Iraqi Election System Still Disfavors Sunni Arabs, Favors Kurds

08/09/2014 Enter presentation title here. 1

NON - CLASSIFIED EADRCC SITUATION REPORT No 2 IRAQ IDP CRISIS

COMMUNITY TRANSITION AND RECOVERY

IRAQ UNHCR IDP OPERATIONAL UPDATE

Executive Summary. International Organization for Migration IOM Iraq: Review of Displacement and Return in Iraq, August 2010

Kurdistan Regional Government Ministry of Interior Duhok Governorate Board of Relief and Humanitarian Affairs B.R.H.A

Iraq. Operational highlights. Working environment

IRAQ UNHCR IDP OPERATIONAL UPDATE

ONLY FOR BE, NL, DE, UK, FR, NO, AT

2.9 m displaced people live outside camps

Iraq Humanitarian Situation Report

UNHCR THEMATIC UPDATE SYRIA AND IRAQ SITUATIONS FINAL REPORT UNHCR Regional Winter Assistance

OFFICE OF THE HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR FOR IRAQ HUMANITARIAN SITUATION REPORT NUMBER 19 8 April 2003

HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE PLAN IRAQ ADVANCE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FEB Photo by OCHA/ Sylvia Rognvik

Protection for the Internally Displaced: Causes and Impact by Sector 1. Objectives

Partnering for Development

2.9 m displaced people live outside camps

IOM EMERGENCY NEEDS ASSESSMENTS FOUR YEARS OF POST-SAMARRA DISPLACEMENT IN IRAQ

DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX (DTM) AFAR REGION, ETHIOPIA ROUND III: JANUARY FEBRUARY 2017 AFAR REGION - KEY FINDINGS.

NON - CLASSIFIED EADRCC SITUATION REPORT No 8 IRAQ IDP CRISIS

IOM Iraq Newsletter Volume I Oct/Nov/Dec Mission in Iraq

EMN Ad-Hoc Query on Ad hoc Query on granting refugee status to applicants claiming to belong to religious minorities Protection

IRAQ - COMPLEX EMERGENCY

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE HUMANITARIAN/RESIDENT COORDINATOR ON THE USE OF CERF GRANTS

A Monthly Newsletter published by the Iraq Foundation

UNHCR THEMATIC UPDATE

Immediate Response Plan Phase II (IRP2)

Iraq Situation Update - August 2008

DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX (DTM) Round VII Report - December 2015 DISPLACEMENT HIGHLIGHTS

Survey of Iraqi. International Republican Institute. December 26, 2004 January 7, 2005

Data Source(s): IOM Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM)

Survey of Iraqi. International Republican Institute May 27 June 11, 2004

Understanding Syrians in Turkey

PROTECTION RAPID NEED ASSESSMNET IN QARARAT AL-KATEF. PROTECTION RAPID NEED ASEESMENT Qararat al-qataf. PROTECTION SECTOR- LIBYA 28 February, 2018

Rapid Needs Assessment (RNA) of Recently Displaced Persons in the Kurdistan Region

MOVEMENT OF VANNI IDPS: RELEASE, RETURN and TRANSFERRED DISPLACEMENT November 2009

OCTOBER SNAPSHOT COMMUNITY TRANSITION AND RECOVERY TOWARDS STABILITY IMPROVING RESILIENCE PROMOTING COHESION

Kenya Initial Rapid Assessment Community Group Discussion

DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX (DTM) OROMIA REGION, ETHIOPIA ROUND III: JANUARY TO FEBRUARY 2017 OROMIA REGION - KEY FINDINGS.

IOM Iraq Rapid Assessment and Response Teams (RART): Anbar Crisis Operations IOM OIM

IOM IRAQ CRISIS FUNDING APPEAL 2018

Transcription:

DTM LOCATION ASSESSMENT GENERAL INFORMATION Governorate District Sub district Place Name (Quarter or village) Place ID Total N of IDP Families in this Location Total N of non IDP families in this location SOURCES AND CREDIBILITY OF INFORMATION Key Informant Name Type Phone number Gender (Male/Female) (Male/Female) (Male/Female) (Male/Female) OK to share contact (Yes/No) (Yes/No) (Yes/No) (Yes/No) Assessment Credibility (field component) - questions to be answered only by the DTM enumerator: 1. Were the information provided by the different key informants matching? Yes all / yes most/ only some/ not at all 2. Were the information provided matching your observation? Yes all/ yes most/ only some/ not at all 3. Did the local authority have lists/records of IDPs? Yes/ no/ NA (if they did not interview local authority) 4. How many sites does this location contains? One site only/ more than one site SHELTER TYPE Shelter Type Number of families Number of Sites Religious Buildings Unfinished/abandoned buildings School buildings Informal settlement Other formal settlement Camps Host community Rented houses Hotels/motels Unknown 1

ETHNICITY - RELIGION N of families Arab Kurd Turkmen Assyrian Armenian Chaldean Sahabak Unknown Other Shia Muslim Sunni Muslim Christian Yazidi Sabean- Mandean Jewish Unknown Other DISPLACEMENT Governorate of Origin Number of families Governorate of Origin Number of families Anbar Missan Babylon Muthanna Baghdad Najaf Basrah Ninewa Dahuk Qadissiya Diyala Salah al Din Erbil Sulaymaniyah Kerbala Thi-Qar Kirkuk Wassit Period of displacement Jan to May 20114 June July 2014 August 2014 Sept 2014 - March 2015 April 2015 to now Number of families 2

What is the main reason of displacement for majority of IDPs living in this location? (single option) Family members killed in generalized violence No personal threat or death in the family but generalized violence and armed conflict Family members killed in targeted violence or family directly threatened for political affiliation Family members killed in targeted violence or family directly threatened for ethnic and religious reasons Evacuated / displaced by the government or local authorities (evacuated them to protect them Or relocated them to safer sites Evicted by private owners (Individuals who are occupying private properties with or without formal documentation of tenure and the owners wanted their property back) Evicted by the government or local authorities (they were on government owned land and the government needed the land for other purposes) Lack of access to basic services Lack of access to sustainable income Has the majority (above 70%) of IDPs living in this location experienced multiple displacements prior to arrival here? Yes/ No/ Unknown Have you heard of individuals >18 living in this location who have moved abroad during 2015 Have you heard of individuals <18 living in this location who have moved abroad during 2015 Yes/ No Yes/ No If yes, please provide the estimated number of individuals: Was the majority females or males? # / Unknown Females/ Males/ Don t know If you heard about people who moved abroad in 2105, which were the three main countries of destination? (Multiple option - rank three) Germany UK Sweden Norway, 3

INTENTION What is the intention of the majority of IDP families living In this location within the next three months? (Single option) Return to their place of origin Locally integrate in the current location (voluntarily) Locally integrate in the current location (involuntarily, they have no other choices) Move to a third location within the country Go abroad What is the intention of the majority (more than 70%) of IDP families living In this location in the long run? (Single option) Return to their place of origin Locally integrate in the current location (voluntarily) Locally integrate in the current location (involuntarily, they have no other choices) Move to a third location within the country Go abroad List the three main considerations or factors influencing the long term decision of IDPs in this location(multiple option- rank three) Security situation Jobs availability Housing availability To be closer to people from my family/friends Service availability (schools, health care, etc.) VULNERABILITY Write the number of IDP individuals or household with the following characteristics or Vulnerabilities Vulnerabilities # Females # Males Number of Unaccompanied or Separated Children Number of Minor Headed Households Number of IDP individuals with disabilities (mental or physical disability) Number of Female Headed Households N/A Number of Pregnant females (Under 18) N/A Number of pregnant females (18+) N/A Zero means: no existing for this vulnerability, while N/A means: No Available information or No Answer 4

NEEDS Rank the first three priority needs in this location in order of importance for IDPs (multiple options rank three). Needs Priority (1-2-3) Drinking Water Cooking/washing Water Food Health Sanitation/ Hygiene Shelter/Housing Needs Priority (1-2-3) Education Access to income Legal help Household Items (NFI) Psychological support Protection of Children What is the main problem associated with each of the sectors below in order of importance (single option). Sector Drinking Water Cooking/washing Water Food Health Sanitation/ Hygiene Main problem 2. Distance (too far, difficult to access by road, unfriendly opening hours) 3. Quality (bad color or taste) 4. Quantity (insufficient, the supply not consistent - i.e. kiosks/fountains/wells run out of water) 5. Unequal Access (IDPs are prevented from accessing water even if it is available) 2. Distance (too far, difficult to access by road, unfriendly opening hours) 3. Quality (bad color or taste) 4. Quantity (insufficient, the supply not consistent - i.e. kiosks/fountains/wells run out of water) 5. Unequal Access (IDPs are prevented from accessing water even if it is available) 2. Distance (too far, difficult to access by road, unfriendly opening hours) 3. Quality (not fresh or bad taste) 4. Quantity (insufficient, the supply not consistent - i.e. markets or shops don t have enough or they run out of it frequently 5. Unequal Access (IDPs are prevented from accessing food even if it is available) 2. Distance (too far, difficult to access by road, unfriendly opening hours) 3. Quality (bad service, unqualified/unfriendly staff), 4. Quantity (facilities are too few or small or overcrowded) 5. Unequal access (IDPs are prevented from accessing health services even if they are available) 6. Lack of type of services (Type of equipment services or treatment offered/available, irregular supply of medicines) 7. No female doctors/healthcare available 1. Distance (the toilets are not on site) 2. Quantity of toilets (< 1/ 20 individuals) 3. Quantity of showers 4. Quality of toilets and showers (they don t work or they are dirty) 5

Shelter/Housing Education Access to income Legal help Household Items (NFI) Psychosocial support 5. Unequal access (IDPs are prevented from accessing available showers and toilets) 6. There is no waste management/disposal 0. No problem 2. Quality (infrastructure is poor, not durable, not strong enough, not adequate) 3. Quantity (there aren t enough houses so there is overcrowding) 4. Unequal access (IDPs are prevented from renting) 1. Price (too expensive; in terms of fees, Books and materials, Uniforms) 2. Distance (too far, difficult to access by road) 3. Quality of Environment (infrastructure is poor and not adequate) 4. Quality of Service (staff skills, female/males classes) 5. Quantity (there are insufficient classes or schools so they are overcrowded) 6. Unequal access (IDPs are prevented from enrolling in school) 1. Distance (too far, difficult access by road) 2. Quantity (Not enough jobs available in the area) 3. Low-paid (Jobs available but Income insufficient) 4. No qualification (Jobs available but IDPs not qualified enough) 5. Unequal access to jobs (discrimination - IDPs are prevented to work) 1. Price (too expensive to hire legal service) 2. Distance (too far, difficult to access by road, not available) 3. Quality (the offered services do not provide required help, unfriendly opening hours, lack of staff) 4. Unequal Access (IDPs are not provided legal services) 5. Lost/ insufficient documentation 1. Price (cannot afford household items) 2. Distance (distributions/shops/magazines are too far, difficult to access by road, unfriendly opening hours) 3. Quality (the items are poor quality) 4. Quantity (there is none or not enough household items available in distributions/local markets) 5. Unequal Access (IDPs are prevented from accessing items or distributions are unfair) 6. Type (the type of items received was not appropriate) 2. Distance (too far, difficult to access by road, unfriendly opening hours) 3. Quality (the offered services do not provide required help) 4. Quantity (there is none or there is no space available in existing services) 5. Unequal Access (IDPs are prevented from accessing services even if it is available, or service access is unfair for IDPs) 6. Socially unacceptable (it's not possible to use psychosocial services for social reasons) 7. No same-sex staff Which are the three main protection issues for IDP children living in this location (Multiple options rank three) Risk of family separation Risk of recruitment into Armed force/group Harassments Risk of danger and injuries, violence or Landmines or unexploded ordinance Violence within the home in the area of this location Child labor Lack of services for children Child Marriage Risk of Kidnapping No Problem 6

SECURITY Does the majority of IDPs living in this location feel safe? Yes/ No In case of a security incident, to whom do IDPs report in this location? (Multiple options rank three) Police Armed militia/groups Iraqi Security Forces Local council Peshmerga Mukhtar Assayish Zervani Private company What are the three most common security incidents for IDPs in this location? (Multiple options rank three ) Friction with host community Friction within IDPs Armed conflicts Theft or Crime Violence against females Violence against males Discrimination No security incident If there have been cases of discrimination, please specify which type: (Mark all that applies) Religious discrimination Gender discrimination- against females Gender discrimination- against males Ethnic discrimination Political discrimination Socioeconomic discrimination Discrimination against IDPs 7

COMMUNICATION What communication channels does the majority of IDPs in this location mostly use? (Multiple options - rank three) Word of mouth (Public places -coffee shops, SMS/ Phone barbershop, etc. or through friends and Printed Newspapers (meaning not online) relatives) Internet TV Social media (i.e. Facebook, Twitter etc) Radio Print material (flyer/banner/poster, etc.) Does the majority of IDPs in this location mostly get general information through whom? (Multiple option- rank three) Friends and families or relatives Religious leaders Political leaders Community leaders Security or police or armed forces bodies Which information IDPs are not able to access easily? (Multiple option- rank three) Info on lost civil status documents Info on Resettlement and movement/migration options Info on Food distributions Info on Water and sanitation Info on Health care Info on Security situation Info on Protection services Info on Registration Info on Legal services No lack of information Info on NFI distribution Are travel opportunities abroad being discussed/advertised in this location? Yes/No/unknown If yes, what are the three most common ways of advertising travel opportunities abroad in this location? (Multiple options - rank three) Word of mouth (Public places -coffee shops, SMS/ Phone barbershop, etc. or through friends and Printed Newspapers (meaning not online) relatives) Internet TV Travel agency Social media (i.e. Facebook, Twitter etc) Radio Print material (flyer/banner/poster, etc.) 8

SEX-AGE DISAGGREGATED DATA (sample randomly 30 families and fill the table below) Female HHs 0-5 6-12 13-17 18-45 46-59 60+ Total 0-5 6-12 13-17 18-45 46-59 60+ Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Male 9

26 27 28 29 30 Total 0-5 6-12 13-17 18-45 46-59 60+ Total 0-5 6-12 13-17 18-45 46-59 60+ Total 10