PILED NOV 2 3. CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT MANITOWOC COUNTY, Wl STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR INDEPENDENT SCIENTIFIC TESTING

Similar documents
Kathleen T. Zellner & Associates, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Esplanade IV 1901 Butterfield Road Suite 650 Downers Grove, Illinois

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH PLAINTIFF, JURY TRIAL TRIAL - DAY 26 5 vs. Case No.

July 13, In his motion for postconviction scientific testing, Mr. Avery sought the Court s permission to conduct:

STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : SHEBOYGAN COUNTY. v. Case No CF 381 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH PLAINTIFF, MOTION HEARING. 5 vs. Case No. 05 CF 381

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY. v. Case No CF 381 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY DEFENDANT S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF JUDGE

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH PLAINTIFF, JURY TRIAL TRIAL - DAY 25 5 vs. Case No.

STATE OF WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II. Case No. 2017AP2288

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH PLAINTIFF, POST-CONVICTION MOTION. 5 vs. Case No. 05 CF 381

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH PLAINTIFF, JURY TRIAL TRIAL-DAY 27 VERDICT 5 vs. Case No.

CIRCUIT COURT. On remand from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Second District, Case No Respondent,

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH PLAINTIFF, ARRAIGNMENT & MOTIONS. 5 vs. Case No. 05 CF 381

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 27

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH PLAINTIFF, MOTION HEARING. 5 vs. Case No. 05 CF 381

(3) The petitioner has exhausted any claim for relief under chapter or 28 U.S.C. 2254;

DEFENDANT STEVEN AVERY'S 'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER ON COPYING AND PRODUCTION OF BLOOD TESTING RECORDS

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH 1 2

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Kenneth L. Collier, : (REGULAR CALENDAR) O P I N I O N. Rendered on May 25, 2006

S 2492 SUBSTITUTE A ======== LC005022/SUB A ======== S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH 1 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY DEFENDANT STEVEN AVERY S SECOND SUPPLEMENT TO PREVIOUSLY FILED MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

CHAPTER 337. (Senate Bill 211)

AGREED PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

This article may be cited as the Access to Justice Post-Conviction DNA Testing Act.

2:15-cr VAR-MKM Doc # 10 Filed 09/24/15 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

CAUSE NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF [INSERT PROPERTY] JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Postconviction DNA Testing: Recommendations to the Judiciary from the National Commission on the Future of DNA Evidence

STATE S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT PREVIOUSLY FILED MOTION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF. Introduction

II. 1. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel 2. Newly discovered evidence III.

WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE. House Bill 2657

(130th General Assembly) (Substitute Senate Bill Number 316) AN ACT

1' Prior Wrongful Conztiction for Attempteil Murder anil Rape. Avery. Plaintiff, ir;' i L iig 'u'i

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

This Article may be cited as the DNA Database and Databank Act of 1993.

This Bill represents one part of the initiatives promoted by this Government in its commitment to reduce crime.

P.L.2014, CHAPTER 127, approved November 9, 2015 Assembly Substitute for Assembly, No. 1678

Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Lacy, Hassell, Keenan, and Koontz, JJ., and Whiting, Senior Justice

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF OCONEE C.A. NO.: 2017-CP-10- Jane Doe, Plaintiff,

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

WISCONSIN PUBLIC RECORDS LAW

State of Wisconsin: Circuit Court: Racine County: v. Case No. 2008CM261. Motion to Exclude State's Witnesses

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellant : JOURNAL ENTRY. vs.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2009 H 2 HOUSE BILL 1190 Committee Substitute Favorable 4/23/09

Onondaga County CFS - Laboratories - Evidence Submission Guidelines March 1, 2017

15A-903. Disclosure of evidence by the State Information subject to disclosure. (a) Upon motion of the defendant, the court must order:

FILED. 1. The volume of discovery in this case is extraordinary. At present count, Srerr or WrscoNSrN,

I N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

STATEMENTS OF POLICY

INVENTORY OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF PROBATION

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

Friday 30th January, 2004.

SHAWANO COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT RULES (Ninth Judicial District) Revised July 2015

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

COMMERCIAL DIVISION PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE ORDER PURSUANT TO PART 202 OF THE UNIFORM CIVIL RULES FOR THE SUPREME COURT KINGS COUNTY

LSA-C.Cr.P. Art Art Definitions

REPORT TO THE MISSOURI ATTORNEY GENERAL

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

Administrative Office of the Courts

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Filing of papers by facsimile or transmission will not be accepted by the Clerk of Circuit Court.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court. Appellate Case No Appeal From Laurens County Donald B. Hocker, Circuit Court Judge

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

Dodge County. 1) Rules of Decorum. (Sixth Judicial District)

IC Chapter 6. Indiana DNA Data Base

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. NICOLE MARGOT TARRACH, Defendant. Justin D. Bodor, Esquire, Assistant District Attorney for the Commonwealth

Protocol for Judge Leo Bowman

NO. D-1-GN-19- SALLY HERNANDEZ, 201ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT TRAVIS COUNTY SHERIFF PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Criminal Evidence 6th Edition

Respondent. The above-entitled matter came before the undersigned Judge of District Court on February

99 Civ (HB) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK THIRD AMENDED ORDER & JUDGMENT

IN THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CHURCHILL

ORDINANCE NO N.S.

Court of Queen s Bench

Rule No. 1: Family Court Commissioner Assignments and Stipulated Hearing Procedures

SEALING OF CRIMINAL HISTORY RECORDS (General Information) July 1, 2017

United States District Court District of Massachusetts (Boston) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:15-cv GAO

Have you received a request for discovery?

* * * * * * * * * * *

LAKE FOREST PARK MUNICIPAL COURT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON C ATLANTA JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF GEORGIA * * * JUDGE SHAWN ELLEN LaGRUA

6. In the body of the motion:

What if the other parent is not making child support payments? The court will consider whether a parent is helping to support their child.

Supreme Court of the United States

MARC E. JOHNSON JUDGE

STA TE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE

CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE SECTION MISDEMEANORS

PETITION TO EXPUNGE CRIMINAL RECORD

FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA 2018 CA 274 THE CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS PLAINTIFF / APPELLANT VS.

APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: WILBUR W. WARREN III, Judge. Affirmed.

SMALL CLAIMS MANUAL. The following information has been made available through the office of the McHenry County Clerk of the

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

ERTIICTATION PROCEDURE OF FOOD PRODUCTS AND OTHER COMMDITIES IMPORTED IN EXPORTED BEYOND THE REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Evidence Preservation and Storage. D. Jody Koehler, M.S. DNA Section Manager Texas Department of Public Safety Crime Laboratory Service Austin

In replevin actions service of process may be made as provided by Rule 54. (Adopted April 4, 1977, effective December 1, 1977).

Transcription:

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT MANITOWOC COUNTY STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN A. AVERY, Defendant. PILED NOV 2 3 CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT MANITOWOC COUNTY, Wl Case No. 2005 CF 381 Judge Angela Sulkiewicz STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR INDEPENDENT SCIENTIFIC TESTING In order to facilitate compliance with the Order On Preservation Of Blood Evidence And Independe nt Defense Testing; and by agreement of the parties, the state by Assistant Attorney General, Special Prosecutor, Thomas J Fallon and Norman Gahn, Special Prosecutor; and defendant Stephen Avery through his counsel Kathleen Zellner and Stephen Richards hereby move the court for an order releasing certain exhibits currently held by either the Clerk of the Circuit Court for Manitowoc County or the Calumet County Sheriffs Department. Specifically, the parties request the release of the following exhibits for independent scientific testing: Ite m A6 Item A8 bloodstain cutting from RAV4 Driver scat swab of ignition area RAV4 Exhibit # 333 Exhibit #336 Item A9 bloodstain culling from passenger seat Exhibit #331 Item A10 swab of bloodstain from CD case Exhibit# 332 Item A12 swab of bloodstain rear passenger s door Exhibit # 334

/ UUUO Item A7 blood flakes on floor by center console Exhibit # 335 Item ID swab from hood latch.1 Exhibit # 205 Ite m C Toyota Rav 4 Ke y Exhibit #211 Blood Via l 1996 sample of Defendant s blood Exhibit #478 The parties have also agreed to the following procedures: 1. 2. All scientific testing set forth by this Order will be done at Defendant s expense. Custody of these exhibits will be released to Lieut. Ma rk Wiegert of the Calumet County Sheriffs Department and the Department's Evidence Custodian on a day and time agreed-upon by the Calumet County Sheriffs Department and the Clerk of the Circuit Court for Ma nitowoc County. 3. Immediately upon receipt of these exhibits, Lieut. Wiegert will transport the Exhibits to the Wisconsin State Crime Laboratory in Ma dis on Wisconsin. 4. The panics agree that all samples will be split in half. Sherry Culhane, a Forensic Scientist with the DNA Unit in the Wisconsin State Crime Laboratory in consultation with Dr. Karl Reich the forensic scientist designated by the defense will split Exhibits 333, 336, 33 1, 332, 334 and 205. With respect to Exhibits 335 and 478, the parties will agree on how these samples are to be split and by which scientist after visually inspecting the samples. However, if cutting Exhibit 335 in half will result in an insufficie nt sample to conduct i Although not covered by the Order On Preservation Of Blood Evidence And Independent Defense Testing, the state agrees to make an exception so that Ite m ID, hood la tch swab and Ite m C, the Toyota Key, Exhibits 205 and 211 respectively, can be cxamined/lested. 2

Radiocarbon testing, the state agrees the entire sample may be consumed to facilitate testing. 5. Before participation in the splitting of the samples. Dr. Reich and or any other defense appointed scientist must agree to follow Wisconsin State Crime La b policy and procedure before being granted admittance to the La b. 6. In consultation with Dr. Karl Reich, Ms. Culhane will ready and package the Exhibits for transport to the laboratory designated by Defendant for independent scientific testing. All costs associated with the packaging, and transporting/shipping of samples will be borne by Defendant. 7. Additionally, before any sample is consumed by testing, the defendant, by affidavit file d with the court prior to the test being conducted, must firs t agree to the consumption and demonstrate a full understanding that the sample(s) will be totally consumed and there may not be any future testing of that sample. 8. There will be simultaneous disclosure in writing to the defendant and the state of the testing results, bench notes, photographs and procedures employed and or protocols used in any scientific testing, including but not limited to DNA Methylation, DNA Source Testing, EDTA and or Radiocarbon Fi4 C of the Exhibits covered by this stipulation. 9. During the pendency of these postconviction proceedings the stale's portion of each exhibit/sample will be maintained and preserved at the Wisconsin State Crime Laboratory in Ma dis on, Wisconsin. At the end of these proceedings the exhibits will be returned to their respective locations. 3

fc'j V V.J M -i / U u O Dole d: Ko\'e;nhcr,-^-(i! u T humus J. i-'jdwn 0 A:'.-'i. Uii\l Auoniov Ca'liera) lx Spceifi! I mxceuloi' Dated: November,*^ 201ft Norman A. Claim Speed;1,1 Prosecutor Kathleen I. /.ollikf A'Unr.v N Uu* De fe tid.mi \ _ Dauxl: Nun cmix'iv -DIO I ft \, i 7"N Sk-scn 0, ivie.li!u Cb Attorney tor Defendant i

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT MANITOWOC COUNTY STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff, FILED v. Case No. 2005 CF381 NOV 2 3 2016 STEVEN A. AVERY, Defendant. CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT MANITOWOC COUNTY, W1 ORDERS FOR INDEPENDENT SCIENTIFIC TESTING Based upon the Order On Preservation Of Blood Evidence And Independent Defense Testing, signed by the Honorable Patrick L. Willis on April 4, 2007; and upon the stipulation of the parties the Clerk for the Circuit Court of Manitowoc County is hereby directed to release the exhibits to the state in accordance with the stipulation of the parties to facilitate independent scientific testing. The Courts therefore enters the following orders. 1. Defendant may conduct independent scientific testing of the following exhibits: Item A6 bloodstain cutting from RAV4 Driver seat Exhibit # 333 Item A8 swab of ignition area RAV4 Exhibit # 336 Item A9 Item A10 Item A12 bloodstain cutting from passenger seal Exhibit# 331 swab of bloodstain from CD case Exhibit # 332 swab of bloodstain rear passenger's door Exhibit #334 Ite m A7 blood flakes on floor by center console Exhibit # 335 5

Ite m ID swab from hood latch Exhibit # 205 Ite m C Toyota Rav 4 Ke y Exhibit #211 Via l of Blood 1996 sample of defendant s blood Exhibit # 478 1. All scientific testing contemplated by this Order will be done at Defendant s expense. 2. Custody of these exhibits will be released to Lieut. Mark Wiegert of the Calumet County Sheriffs Department and the Department s Evidence Custodian on a day and time agreed-upon by the Calumet County Sheriffs Department and the Clerk of the Circuit Court for Ma nitowoc County. 3. Immediately upon receipt of these exhibits, Lieut. Wiegert will transport the Exhibits to the Wisconsin State Crime Laboratory in Ma dis on Wisconsin. 4. All samples will be split in half. Sherry Culhane, a Forensic Scientist with the DNA Unit in the Wisconsin State Crime Laboratory' in consultation with Dr. Karl Reich the fore nsic scientist designated by the defense will split Exhibits 333, 336, 331, 332, 334 and 205. Willi respect to Exhibits 335 and 478, the parties will agree on how these samples are to be split and by which scientist after visually inspecting the samples. However, if cutting Exhibit 335 in half will result in an insufficie nt sample to conduct Radiocarbon testing, the state agrees the entire sample may be consumed to facilitate testing. 5. Before participating in the splitting of the samples. Dr. Reich and or any other defense appointed scientist must agree to follow Wisconsin State Crime La b policy and procedures before being granted admittance to the La b. 6

6. In consultation with Dr. Ka rl Reich the forensic scientist designated by the defense, Ms. Culhane will ready and package the Exhibits for transport to the laboratory designated by the defense for independent scientific testing. All costs associated with the packaging, and transporting/shipping of samples to and from the Wisconsin Crime Laboratory in Ma dis on will be borne by Defendant. 7 Additionally, before any sample is consumed by testing, the defendant, by affidavit, must first agree to the consumption and demonstrate a full understanding that the samples provided by the state will be totally consumed and there may not be any future testing of that sample. 8. There will be simultaneous disclosure in writing to the defendant and the state of the testing results, bench notes, photographs and procedures employed and or protocols used in any scientific testing of the Exhibits covered by this stipulation, including but not limited to DNA Methylation, DNA Source Testing, EDTA and or Radiocarbon Fi4 C of the Exhibits covered by this stipulation. 9. During the pendency of these postconviction proceedings the state s portion of each exhibitysample will be maintained and preserved at the Wisconsin State Crime Laboratory 7

iri Ma dis on, Wisconsin. At the end of these proceedings the exhibits will be returned to their respective locations. fv Dated at Sheboygan, Wisconsin, this^ _ day of November, 2016 C\j\rv Ik The Honorable Angela W. Sutkiewicz Circuit Court Judge for Manitowoc County by As s ignme nt 8