Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

Similar documents
Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

City of Calistoga Staff Report

IMPERIAL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM

ORDINANCE NO The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

Agenda Item A.2 CONSENT CALENDAR Meeting Date: June 16, 2009

ORDINANCE NO The City Council of the City of Moreno Valley does hereby ordain as follows:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PROVIDING FOR LAND USE PLANNING AND ZONING REGULATIONS AND RELATED FUNCTIONS.

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 18

ORDINANCE NO. 553 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF

TOWN OF TROPHY CLUB, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO P&Z

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONCORD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Item 8C 1 of 17

STAFF REPORT SAUSALITO CITY COUNCIL

Appendix A: Draft Billboard Ordinance

ORDINANCE NO. O

ORDINANCE NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MISSION VIEJO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

Attachment 2. Planning Commission Resolution No Recommending a Zone Text Amendment

CITY OF PALMDALE. REPORT to the Mayor and Members of the City Council from the City Manager

Ordinance No. O Page 1 of 5

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE

CB District Central Business

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4673

ORDINANCE # NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, by the City Council of the City of American Canyon as follows:

TOWN OF SEWALL S POINT

COUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA (707) FAX (707)

ORDINANCE NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELMONT DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ARTICLE 1 INTRODUCTION

ORDINANCE NO

South Carolina General Assembly 115th Session,

LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE

Article 1.0 General Provisions

John Harpootlian Thursday, June 09, :38 AM Deborah Padovan Fw: Joint Los Altos/Los Altos Hills Senior Commission

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCATA AMENDING THE ADMINISTRATION CITATION PROCEDURE OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE

Public hearing to adopt Ordinance 1375 C.S. amending Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the Martinez Municipal Code

Resolution No

County Of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

1 [Proposing Adoption of Infrastructure Financing Plan - Infrastructure and Revitalization Financing District No. 2 (Hoedown Yard, Pier 70)] 2

ORDINANCE NO NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GOLDEN, COLORADO:

1. Adopt an ordinance amending the Santa Ana Municipal Code for additional remedies for Code Enforcement violations.

AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION TO THE EL DORADO COUNTY CODE PROHIBITING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES

ORDINANCE NO U

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

City Attorney s Synopsis

MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT

RESOLUTION NO

CHAPTER ADMINISTRATION 1

RESOLUTION NUMBER 2757

ORDINANCE NO. City Attorney s Synopsis

ORDINANCE NO

in Sections et seq. of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; herein the State Fireworks Law")

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, Article XI of the Charter requires the City Commission to place the charter review committee s proposals on the ballot; and

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING SECTION OF CHAPTER ( PARKING AND

ORDINANCE NO IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF DEBARY AS FOLLOWS:

NOW THEREFORE BE IT ENACTED AND ORDAINED

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1255

ORDINANCE NO Findings. The City Council hereby finds and declares the following:

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Yolo hereby ordains as follows:

City of Los Alamitos

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS HEREBY ORDAINS AS

-MENDOCINO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES- DIVISION III OF TITLE 20 MENDOCINO TOWN ZONING CODE

ORDINANCE NO ADOPTING AND ENACTING IMPACT FEES FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT RECITIALS

Upon motion by, seconded by, the following. Ordinance was duly enacted, voting in favor of enactment, voting against enactment.

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO. N.C. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VALLEJO CONCERNING THE MAINTENANCE SIDEWALKS

City of Palo Alto (ID # 7425) City Council Staff Report

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TOWN CODE AMENDMENT A HOME OCCUPATIONS

ORDINANCE NO. 14. Ordinance No. 14 December 7, 2016 Page 1 of 7

RESOLUTION NO

CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA ORDINANCE NO AN AMENDMENT TO THE BONITA SPRINGS LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE

RESOLUTION NO /0001/62863v1

ORDINANCE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF WELLINGTON, COLORADO THAT:

STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: April 18, City Council. FROM: Regan M. Candelario, City Manager. PRESENTER: Claudia Laughter, City Clerk

BRISTOL, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL 300 Lee Street, Bristol, Virginia December 19, 2017

CARLISLE HOME RULE CHARTER. ARTICLE I General Provisions

ORDINANCE. D. The Planning Commission shall be vested with the authority to approve or disapprove Lot Add-on plans.

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT by and between THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES and DOUGLAS EMMETT MANAGEMENT, LLC dated as of

NEW BUSINESS Agenda Item No. : 8b CC Mtg. : 7/12/2005

CITY OF SANIBEL ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE NO. ORD

ORDINANCE NO C.S.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

STAFF REPORT. Meeting Date: To: From: Subject:

ORDINANCE NUMBER -2..Q.Q..3~) (City Council Series)

(JULY 2000 EDITION, Pub. by City of LA) Rev. 9/13/

ORDINANCE NO The Board ofsupervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

ORDINANCE NO The City Council of the City of Manteca does ordain as follows:

CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA ` ORDINANCE NO

IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE TOWN OF FORT MYERS BEACH AS FOLLOWS:

Chapter 33G SERVICE CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

ZONING ORDINANCE CLAY TOWNSHIP LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

The Planning and Development Act

Chapter 1 - GENERAL PROVISIONS

City of Carpinteria. COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT April 27, 2015

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1312

Public Hearing Published 11/16/2017 First Reading 12/07/2017 Public Hearing 12/07/2017 Adopted 12/21/2017 ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE NO. 730 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALISTOGA AMENDING THE CALISTOGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND CHAPTER 8

APPENDIX TO CODE OF ORDINANCES USE AND MAINTENANCE OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES

Transcription:

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA 94559-0660 (707) 257-9530 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT March 19, 2015 AGENDA ITEM # 6.A. Ordinance Amendment to Extend Tentative Map Expiration in Accordance with State Law. I. GENERAL INFORMATION PROJECT SUMMARY: LOCATION OF PROJECT: STAFF PLANNER: Ordinance Amendment to Extend Tentative Map Expiration in Accordance with Assembly Bill 116 (AB 116) Citywide Scott Klingbeil, Senior Planner Phone: (707) 257-9530 II. BACKGROUND / PROJECT DESCRIPTION In recent years, the State Legislature has adopted a series of bills that add time extensions to the life of subdivision map approvals. The City codified all of these bills, into Ordinances (Ord. O2010 2) effective January 26, 2010 and (Ord. No. O2012 12) which was effective October 20, 2012. The adoption of the 2012 Ordinance extended the expiration of tentative maps to comply with State law and ensured that the multiple discretionary entitlements associated with tentative maps are synchronized to coincide with the life of the underlying tentative map. AB 116 On July 11, 2013, AB 116 became effective. This act provides an automatic 24-month extension for certain unexpired subdivision maps approved after January 1, 2000, and establishes an extension process for earlier-approved maps. While the Legislature has extended unexpired subdivision maps several times before, the process established under AB 116 is more comprehensive than previous extensions. Under the new law, subdivision maps approved after January 1, 2000, and unexpired as of July 11, 2013, are automatically extended by 24 months. For earlier-approved maps, cities have the option to approve, conditionally approve or deny a 24-month extension, depending on whether the map is consistent with the applicable zoning and General Plan. The purpose of this amendment is to reference the section of the State law that grants this extension in the Municipal Code. The proposed Ordinance contained in Attachment 1 adds references to the new section of the Government Code which grants these extensions in 16.20.090, 16.20.100, 16.28.080 and 16.28.090 of the Municipal Code to implement this change. The Ordinance also provides that notwithstanding its effective 1

AB 116 Tentative Map Extension 2 date, the City shall consider all land use entitlements associated with tentative maps and tentative parcel maps that had not expired as of the effective date of AB 116 to have been similarly extended coterminously with the associated maps. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Staff has determined that the project is not subject to CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c), as the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of CEQA. IV. REQUIRED FINDINGS Approval of an amendment is subject to the required findings in Napa Municipal Code Section 17.66.080 relating to amendments to the Municipal Code. These findings are provided in the draft Ordinance attached to this Staff Report. V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation to the City Council to approve the proposed Ordinance amendment addressing extensions to tentative maps as the amendment is consistent with the City s General Plan. VI. NOTICE Notice of the public hearing was published in the Napa Valley Register on March 6, 2015. VII. REQUIRED ACTIONS Forward a recommendation that the City Council approve amending Sections 16.20.090, 16.020.100, 16.28.080 and 16.28.090 of the Municipal Code for the purpose of granting automatic time extension of tentative maps in accordance with State law. VIII. DOCUMENTS ATTACHED 1. Attachment 1: Proposed Ordinance Amendment 2. Attachment 2: Assembly Bill 116 3. Attachment 3: Subdivision Map Act Government Code section 66452.24. 4. Attachment 4: Table of Affected Active Tentative Maps 2

ATTACHMENT 1 ORDINANCE O2015 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NAPA, OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING NAPA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 16.20.090, 16.20.100, 16.28.080 AND 16.28.090 GRANTING AUTOMATIC TIME EXTENSIONS OF TENTATIVE MAPS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND EXTENDING OF DISCRETIONARY LAND USE APPROVALS ASSOCIATED WITH TENTATIVE MAPS WHEREAS, under the Municipal Code, tentative subdivision maps and tentative parcel maps approved by the City are valid for an initial time period of two years, and may be extended for up to a total of six additional years; and WHEREAS, in July 2013, the California State legislature has enacted Assembly Bill 116, which adds an additional section to the Subdivision Map Act codified at Government Code section 66452.24, which extends the expiration date of any approved tentative map or vesting tentative map approved after January 1, 2000, and unexpired as of July 11, 2013, are automatically extended by 24 months and for earlier-approved maps, cities have the option to approve, conditionally approve or deny a 24-month extension, depending on whether the map is consistent with the applicable zoning and General Plan; and WHEREAS, the State legislation specifically states that this amendment is to permit local jurisdictions to preserve development applications that are set to expire and that cannot be processed presently due to prevailing adverse economic conditions in the construction industry; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the following amendments to the Napa Municipal Code are consistent with section 17.66.080 of the Napa Municipal Code in that the proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and serves the public health, safety and general welfare of the community; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all information related to this matter, as presented at the public meeting of the City Council identified herein, including any supporting reports by City Staff, and any information provided during public meetings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Napa as follows: SECTION 1: Findings. As required by Napa Municipal Code section 17.66.080, the City Council hereby makes the following findings in support of the amendments to the zoning regulations set forth under this Ordinance: A. The proposed amendment is consistent in principle with the General Plan. The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan in that the amendments merely extend entitlements already granted which are consistent with the O2015 Page 1 of 4 3

ATTACHMENT 1 General Plan. B. The public health, safety and general welfare are served by the adoption of the proposed amendment. Since the provisions of the amendment are required by State law, it is in the public interest for the Municipal Code to be consistent with State regulations. C. If a rezoning to a district with a larger minimum lot size is proposed, effectively reducing the planned density, the City shall also find that the remaining sites in the Housing Element are adequate to accommodate the jurisdiction s share of the regional housing need pursuant to California Government Code section 65584; or if not, that it has identified sufficient additional, adequate and available sites with an equal or greater density in the jurisdiction so that there is no net loss of unit capacity. This finding is not applicable to this project because the project does not include any proposal to increase a minimum lot size nor does it eliminate any site designated in the Housing Element from future use as a housing site. SECTION 2: Amendment. Napa Municipal Code Section 16.20.090(E) is hereby repealed in its entirety. A new Section 16.20.090(E) is hereby added to Chapter 16.20 to read as set forth below [Note: Subsections 16.20.090(A) through 16.20.090(D) are not modified by this amendment]: 16.20.090 Expiration E. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 17.68.170 of this code to the contrary, if an approved or conditionally approved tentative map is subject to an automatic extension of the expiration date pursuant to California Government Code Section 66452.21, 66452.22, 66452.23 or 66452.24, and if the tentative map was approved or conditionally approved in conjunction with a separate discretionary land use entitlement (including design review permits, use permits, variances, or other discretionary land use entitlements), then the initial expiration date of the separate discretionary land use entitlement shall automatically be extended to be equal to the expiration date of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map. SECTION 3: Amendment. Napa Municipal Code Section 16.20.100 is hereby repealed in its entirety. A new Section 16.20.100 is hereby added to read as set forth below: 16.20.100 Extensions Upon application of the subdivider filed with Community Development Director prior to the expiration of the tentative map, such map may be extended by the Council as provided for in Section 66452.6 of the Subdivision Map Act. Once such application is timely filed, the map shall be automatically extended as provided in Section 66452.6, 66452.23 and 66452.24 of the Subdivision Map Act. O2015 Page 2 of 4 4

ATTACHMENT 1 SECTION 4: Amendment. Napa Municipal Code Section 16.28.080(E) is hereby repealed in its entirety. A new Section 16.28.080(E) is hereby added to Section 16.28.080 to read as set forth below [Note: Subsections 16.28.080(A) through 16.28.080(D) are not modified by this amendment]: 16.28.080 Expiration E. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 17.68.170 of this Code to the contrary, if an approved or conditionally approved tentative parcel map is subject to an automatic extension of the expiration date pursuant to California Government Code sections 66452.21, 66452.22, 66452.23 or 66452.24, and if the tentative parcel map was approved or conditionally approved in conjunction with a separate discretionary land use entitlement (including design review permits, use permits, variances, or other approved or conditionally approved in conjunction with a separate discretionary land discretionary land use entitlements), then the initial expiration date of the separate discretionary land use entitlement shall automatically be extended to be equal to the expiration date of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map. SECTION 5: Amendment. Napa Municipal Code Section 16.28.090 is hereby repealed in its entirety. A new Section 16.28.090 is hereby added to Chapter 16.28 to read as set forth below: 16.28.090 Extensions Upon application of the subdivider filed with Community Development Director prior to the expiration of the tentative parcel map such map may be extended by the Planning Commission as provided for in Section 66463.5 of the Subdivision Map Act. Once such application is timely filed, the map shall automatically be extended as provided in Section 66463.5, 66452.23 or 66452.24 of the Subdivision Map Act. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final unless appealed to the Council within 10 calendar days of the Commission s decision by filing a written appeal with the City Clerk. The Council may in its sole discretion extend the time at which such map expires. SECTION 6: Retroactive Effect of Adoption of Ordinance. Notwithstanding the effective date of this ordinance, any separate discretionary land use entitlements associated with a tentative map or tentative parcel map that had not expired as of July 1, 2013 and would thus be subject to an automatic extension of the expiration date pursuant to California Government Code section 66452.24 shall be deemed to have been extended so as to expire on the expiration date of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map as of the effective date of the act that added California Government Code 66452.24. SECTION 7: Severability. If any section, sub-section, subdivision, paragraph, clause or phrase in this Ordinance, or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining sections or portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council, hereby declares that it would have passed each section, sub-section, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases may be declared O2015 Page 3 of 4 5

ATTACHMENT 1 invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 7: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days following adoption. City of Napa, a municipal corporation MAYOR: ATTEST: CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF NAPA OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF NAPA CITY OF NAPA SS: I, Dorothy R. Roberts, City Clerk of the City of Napa, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance had its first reading and was introduced during the regular meeting of the City Council on the day of, 2015, and had its second reading and was adopted and passed during the regular meeting of the City Council on the day of, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF NAPA Michael W. Barrett City Attorney O2015 Page 4 of 4 6

ATTACHMENT 2 Assembly Bill No. 116 CHAPTER 62 An act to amend Section 65961 of, and to add Section 66452.24 to, the Government Code, relating to land use, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately. [Approved by Governor July 11, 2013. Filed with Secretary of State July 11, 2013.] legislative counsel s digest AB 116, Bocanegra. Land use: subdivision maps: expiration dates. (1) The Subdivision Map Act vests the authority to regulate and control the design and improvement of subdivisions in the legislative body of a local agency, and sets forth procedures governing the local agency s processing, approval, conditional approval or disapproval, and filing of tentative, final, and parcel maps, and the modification thereof. The act generally requires a subdivider to file a tentative map or vesting tentative map with the local agency, as specified, and the local agency, in turn, to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the map within a specified time period. The act requires an approved tentative map or vesting tentative map to expire 24 months after its approval, or after an additional period of time prescribed by local ordinance, not to exceed 12 months. However, the act extends the expiration date of certain approved tentative maps and vesting tentative maps, as specified. This bill would extend by 24 months the expiration date of any approved tentative map or vesting tentative map that was approved on or after January 1, 2000. The bill would additionally require the extension of an approved or conditionally approved tentative map or vesting tentative map, or parcel map for which a tentative map or vesting tentative map was approved on or before December 31, 1999, upon application by the subdivider at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the map, as specified. By adding to the procedures that local agency officials must follow, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The Permit Streamlining Act prohibits a local agency, after its approval of a tentative map for a subdivision of single- or multiple-family units, from requiring conformance with, or the performance of, any conditions that the local agency could have lawfully imposed as a condition to the previously approved tentative or parcel map, as a condition to the issuance of any building permit or equivalent permit upon approval of that subdivision, during a 5-year period following the recordation of the final map or parcel map for that subdivision. The act also prohibits a local agency from refusing to issue a building permit or equivalent permit for a subdivider s failure to conform with or perform those conditions. However, 95 7

Ch. 62 2 ATTACHMENT 2 the act also provides that this 5-year period is a 3-year period for a tentative map extended pursuant to a specified provision of law, and the local agency is not prohibited from levying a fee, or imposing a condition that requires the payment of a fee upon the issuance of a building permit, with respect to the underlying units. This bill would provide that a tentative map extended pursuant to its provisions is also subject to the truncated 3-year period described above, and that the local agency is not prohibited from levying a fee, as specified, or imposing a condition that requires the payment of a fee upon the issuance of a building permit, with respect to the underlying units. By adding to the procedures that local agency officials must follow, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (4) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: SECTION 1. Section 65961 of the Government Code is amended to read: 65961. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, except as provided in subdivisions (e) and (f), upon approval or conditional approval of a tentative map for a subdivision of single- or multiple-family units, or upon recordation of a parcel map for such a subdivision for which no tentative map was required, during the five-year period following recordation of the final map or parcel map for the subdivision, a city, county, or city and county shall not require as a condition to the issuance of any building permit or equivalent permit for such single- or multiple-family units, conformance with or the performance of any conditions that the city or county could have lawfully imposed as a condition to the previously approved tentative or parcel map. Nor shall a city, county, or city and county withhold or refuse to issue a building permit or equivalent permit for failure to conform with or perform any conditions that the city, county, or city and county could have lawfully imposed as a condition to the previously approved tentative or parcel map. However, the provisions of this section shall not prohibit a city, county, or city and county from doing any of the following: (a) Imposing conditions or requirements upon the issuance of a building permit or equivalent permit which could have been lawfully imposed as a condition to the approval of a tentative or parcel map if the local agency finds it necessary to impose the condition or requirement for any of the following reasons: 95 8

3 Ch. 62 ATTACHMENT 2 (1) A failure to do so would place the residents of the subdivision or of the immediate community, or both, in a condition perilous to their health or safety, or both. (2) The condition is required in order to comply with state or federal law. (b) Withholding or refusing to issue a building permit or equivalent permit if the local agency finds it is required to do so in order to comply with state or federal law. (c) Assuring compliance with the applicable zoning ordinance. (d) This section shall also apply to a city or city and county which incorporates on or after January 1, 1985, and which includes within its boundaries any areas included in the tentative or parcel map described in this section. When the incorporation includes areas included in the tentative or parcel map described in this section, a condition that the city could have lawfully imposed as a condition to the previously approved tentative or parcel map, as used in this section, refers to conditions the county could have imposed had there been no incorporation. (e) For purposes only of a tentative subdivision map or parcel map that is extended pursuant to Section 66452.22, 66452.23, or 66452.24, the five-year period described in this section shall be three years. (f) For purposes only of a tentative subdivision map or parcel map that is extended pursuant to Section 66452.22, 66452.23, or 66452.24, this section does not prohibit a city, county, or city and county from levying a fee or imposing a condition that requires the payment of a fee in the amount in effect upon the issuance of a building permit, including an adopted fee that is not included within an applicable zoning ordinance, upon the issuance of a building permit, including, but not limited to, a fee defined in Section 66000. SEC. 2. Section 66452.24 is added to the Government Code, to read: 66452.24. (a) The expiration date of any tentative map, vesting tentative map, or parcel map for which a tentative map or vesting tentative map, as the case may be, that was approved on or after January 1, 2000, and that has not expired on or before the effective date of the act that added this section, shall be extended by 24 months. (b) Upon application of the subdivider filed at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map or vesting tentative map, or parcel map for which the tentative map or vesting tentative map, as the case may be, that was approved on or before December 31, 1999, the time at which the map expires shall be extended by the legislative body or by an advisory agency authorized to approve or conditionally approve tentative maps, for a period of 24 months upon a determination that the map is consistent with the applicable zoning and general plan requirements in effect when the application is filed. If the map is determined not to be consistent with applicable zoning and general plan requirements in effect when the application is filed, the legislative body or advisory agency may deny or conditionally approve an extension for a period of 24 months. Prior to the expiration of an approved or conditionally approved tentative 95 9

Ch. 62 4 ATTACHMENT 2 map, upon an application by the subdivider to extend that map, the map shall automatically be extended for 60 days or until the application for the extension is approved, conditionally approved, or denied, whichever occurs last. If the advisory agency denies a subdivider s application for an extension, the subdivider may appeal to the legislative body within 15 days after the advisory agency has denied the extension. (c) The extension provided by subdivisions (a) and (b) shall be in addition to any extension of the expiration date provided for in Section 66452.6, 66452.11, 66452.13, 66452.21, 66452.22, 66452.23, or 66463.5. (d) Any legislative, administrative, or other approval by any state agency that pertains to a development project included in a map that is extended pursuant to subdivisions (a) and (b) shall be extended by 24 months if this approval has not expired on or before the effective date of the act that added this section. This extension shall be in addition to any extension provided for in Sections 66452.13, 66452.21, 66452.22, and 66452.23. (e) The provisions of Section 65961 relating to conditions that may be imposed upon or after a building permit for a subdivision of single- or multiple-family units or a parcel map for a subdivision for which no tentative map was required, are modified as set forth in subdivisions (e) and (f) of Section 65961 for tentative maps extended pursuant to this section. SEC. 3. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code. SEC. 4. This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are: In order to permit cities, counties, and cities and counties to preserve development applications that are set to expire and that cannot be processed presently due to prevailing adverse economic conditions in the construction industry, it is necessary that this act take effect immediately. O 95 10

ATTACHMENT 3 Government Code section 66452.24 66452.24 (a) The expiration date of any tentative map, vesting tentative map, or parcel map for which a tentative map or vesting tentative map, as the case may be, that was approved on or after January 1, 2000, and that has not expired on or before the effective date of the act that added this section, shall be extended by 24 months. (b) Upon application of the subdivider filed at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map or vesting tentative map, or parcel map for which the tentative map or vesting tentative map, as the case may be, that was approved on or before December 31, 1999, the time at which the map expires shall be extended by the legislative body or by an advisory agency authorized to approve or conditionally approve tentative maps, for a period of 24 months upon a determination that the map is consistent with the applicable zoning and general plan requirements in effect when the application is filed. If the map is determined not to be consistent with applicable zoning and general plan requirements in effect when the application is filed, the legislative body or advisory agency may deny or conditionally approve an extension for a period of24 months. Prior to the expiration of an approved or conditionally approved tentative map, upon an application by the subdivider to extend that map, the map shall automatically be extended for 60 days or until the application for the extension is approved, conditionally approved, or denied, whichever occurs last. If the advisory agency denies a subdivider's application for an extension, the subdivider may appeal to the legislative body within 15 days after the advisory agency has denied the extension. (c) The extension provided by subdivisions (a) and (b) shall be in addition to any extension of the expiration date provided for in Section 66452.6, 66452.11, 66452.13, 66452.21, 66452.22, 66452.23, or 66463.5. (d) Any legislative, administrative, or other approval by any state agency that pe1tains to a development project included in a map that is extended pursuant to subdivisions (a) and (b) shall be extended by 24 months if this approval has not expired on or before the effective date of the act that added this section. This extension shall be in addition to any extension provided for in Sections 66452.13, 66452.21, 66452.22, and 66452.23. (e) The provisions of Section 65961 relating to conditions that may be imposed upon or after a building permit for a subdivision of single- or multiple-family units or a parcel map for a subdivision for which no tentative map was required, are modified as set forth in subdivisions (e)and (f) of Section 6596 I for tentative maps extended pmsuant to this section. (Added by Stats. 2013, Ch. 62, Sec. 2. Effective July 11, 2013.) 11

12

ATTACHMENT 4 A C T I V E T E N T A T I V E M A P S Expiration Dates with City and State Extensions Planning Division Community Development Department PROJECT DESCRIPTION RELATED ENTITLEMENTS 04-0200 SA Baker Laurel 04-0246 SA Golden Gate 04-0254 PM Craftsman Court 04-0259 SA Los Robles 05-0054 SA River Park Townhomes 05-115 PM Silverado Glen 05-0198 SA Cecile Court 05-0218 SA Juanita Court 05-0232 SA Foothill Estates 05-0235 SA Marina Vista 05-0151 PM Wojtkowiak 06-0037 PM Reid 7-lot 17 townhomes 5-lot 54 townhomes 6-lot 5-lot 10-lot 42-unit condo conversion UP for small lots DR for dwellings and units VA for setbacks VA for parking UP for Hillside density PD for project UP for condo standards and units UP for Hillside density UP for small lots UP for parking DR for dwellings UP for reduced density and dwellings UP for small lots and dwellings UP for condo conversion VA for parking RESIDENTIAL TENTATIVE MAPS APPROVAL INITIAL EXP. CITY EXT. (SB1185) (AB 333) (AB 208) (AB 116) 02.03.2009 02.03.2011 NA 02.03.2013 02.03.2015 02.03.2017 12.06.2005 12.06.2007 12.15.2005 12.27.2007 11.14.2006 11.14.2008 08.15.2006 08.15.2008 12.06.2009 (04-0246) 12.27.2009 (07-0152) 11.14.2010 (08-0133) 08.15.2011 (08-0083) 12.06.2010 12.06.2012 12.06.2014 12.06.2016 12.27.2010 12.27.2012 12.27.2014 12.27.2016 11.14.2011 11.14.2013 11.14.2015 11.14.2017 08.15.2012 08.15.2014 NA 08.15.2016 01.05.2012 01.15.2014 NA NA NA 0.15.2016 07.18.2006 07.30.2008 07.30.2010 (08-0024) 11.14.2006 11.14.2008 11.14.10 (08-0109) 07.30.2011 07.30.2013 07.30.2015 07.30.2017 11.14.2011 11.14.2013 11.14.2015 11.14.2017 10.17.2006 10.17.2008 10.17.2009 10.17.2011 10.17.2013 10.17.2015 02.05.2008 02.05.2010 02.05.2011 02.05.2013 02.05.2015 02.05.2017 10.20.2005 11.01.2007 11.01.2009 (07-0137) 11.01.2010 11.01.2013 11.01.2015 11.01.2017 11.16.2006 11.28.2008 11.28.2009 11.28.2011 11.28.2013 11.28.2015 13 1 of 5

PROJECT DESCRIPTION RELATED ENTITLEMENTS 06-0064 PM D Street 06-0119 SA Modrall 06-0121 PM 2053 West Pueblo 06-0124 SA Pear Tree Terrace 06-0132 PM Darter 06-0156 PM Khan. Michael 06-0169 PM Trieste 06-0182 SA Eastview Estates 07-0020 PM Pine Street 07-0076 PM Gompertz 07-0011 PM Morningside 07-0031 SA Lefty s Townhomes 07-0068 SA Redwood Duets 07-0135 PM Vivan 07-0136 PM G and K 07-0165 PM Ingham condo 6-lot 71 townhomes 6-lot 33 townhomes 34 townhomes 3-lot UP for condo standards UP for Hillside density and dwellings UP for small lots UP for parking and units UP for Hillside density UP for Hillside density DR for dwellings UP for increased density and residences and units UP for parking UP for small lot and un its VAR for setback RESIDENTIAL TENTATIVE MAPS APPROVAL INITIAL EXP. CITY EXT. (SB1185) (AB 333) ATTACHMENT 4 (AB 208) (AB 116) 09.07.2006 09.19.2008 09.19.2009 09.19.2011 09.19.2013 09.19.2015 01.08.2008 01.08.2010 01.08.2011 01.08.2013 01.08.2015 01.08.2017 02.15.2007 02.27.2009 02.27.2010 02.27.2012 02.27.2014 02.27.2016 11.20.2007 11.20.2009 11.20.2010 11.20.2012 11.20.2014 11.20.2016 02.15.2007 02.27.2009 02.27.2010 02.27.2012 02.27.2014 02.27.2016 02.21.2008 03.04.2010 03.04.2011 03.04.2013 03.04.2015 03.04.2017 01.18.2007 01.30.2009 01.30.2010 01.30.2012 01.30.2014 01.30.2016 11.06.2007 11.06.2009 11.06.2010 11.06.2012 11.06.2014 11.06.2016 04.05.2007 04.17.2009 04.17.2010 04.17.2012 04.17.2014 04.17.2016 10.18.2007 10.30.2009 10.30.2010 10.30.2012 10.30.2014 10.30.2016 04.15.2010 04.27.2012 NA NA 04.27.2014 04.27.2016 11.20.2007 11.20.2009 11.20.2010 11.20.2012 11.20.2014 11.20.2016 06.03.2008 06.03.2010 06.03.2011 06.03.2013 06.03.2015 06.03.2017 07.10.2008 07.22.2010 NA 07.22.2012 07.22.2014 07.22.2016 03.20.2008 04.1.2010 04.01.2011 04.01.2013 04.01.2015 04.01.2017 05.15.2008 05.28.2010 05.28.2011 05.28.2013 05.28.2015 05.28.2017 Active Tentative Maps 2 of 5 14

PROJECT DESCRIPTION RELATED ENTITLEMENTS 07-0167 PM Cox Coffield 07-0168 The Hollow 08-0007 PM Lopez 08-0012 PM Hoffman 08-0029 PM Eastside 08-0047 PM Guerrera 08-0090 PM E Street 08-0128 SA Giamo 09-0011 SA Riordan 09-0042 PM Dittman 10-0004 SA Napa Creek Condominiums 10-0017 Miller Mobile Home Park Expansion 10-0066 SA Mayacamas Vista Estates 10-0113 PM Dornaus 11-0034 PM Scheufler Court 1 3-lot 3-lot 6-lot 10-lot w. remainder 48-unit condo add 20 mobile homes 19-lot 3-lot UP for Hillside density UP for Hillside COA for house demo RESIDENTIAL TENTATIVE MAPS APPROVAL INITIAL EXP. CITY EXT. (SB1185) (AB 333) (AB 208) (AB 116) 04.17.2008 04.17.2010 04.17.2011 04.17.2013 04.17.2015 04.17.2017 10.7.2008 10.07.2010 NA 10.07.2012 10.04.2014 10.04.2016 09.18.2008 09.30.2010 NA 09.30.2012 09.30.2014 09.30.2016 07.10.2008 07.22.2010 07.22.2011 07.22.2013 07.22.2015 07.22.2017 05.05.2009 05.05.2011 NA 05.05.2013 05.05.2015 05.05.2017 07.10.2008 07.22.2010 07.22.2011 07.22.2013 07.22.2015 07.22.2017 12.04.2008 12.16.2010 NA 12.16.2012 12.16.2014 12.16.2016 UP for increased density and residences UP for increased density and residences 06.01.2010 06.01.2012 NA NA 06.01.2014 06.01.2016 05.04.2010 05.04.2012 NA NA 05.14.2014 05.14.2016 09.29.2009 09.29.2011 NA 09.29.2013 09.29.2015 09.29.2017 UP for density reduction UP for tandem parking UP for parking modification VA for building setback VA for fence setback DR for buildings UP for expansion of existing mobile home park (only entitlement no TM processed) and dwellings VA for yards & setbacks UP for small lot VA for setback 02.01.2011 02.01.2013 NA NA 02.01.2015 02.01.2017 07.21.2011 07.31.2013 08.06.2015 (13-0066) ATTACHMENT 4 NA NA NA NA 02.01.2011 02.01.2013 NA NA 02.01.2015 02.01.2017 05.19.2011 05.31.2013 NA NA 05.31.2015 05.31.2017 04.19.2012 04.29.2014 NA NA NA 04.29.2016 Active Tentative Maps 3 of 5 15

PROJECT DESCRIPTION RELATED ENTITLEMENTS 13-0132 PM (12-0012 PM) West Lincoln 13-0072 PM Black Elk Building 13-0047 SA Rubenstein Subdivision 13-0089 PM Rue Carrie 13-0133 SA Wine Country Cottages 13-0135 PM Warren Street 14-0036 SA Dry Creek 14-0090 PM Autumn Creek 14-0096 PM Pine Street 14-0115 SA Old Vine Way 4-unit condo (3 res / 1 com) 8-lot 11-lot 3-lot 1 3-lot 6-lot UP for off-site & valet parking & bar open after 11PM DR for building & map and dwellings UP for tandem parking and dwellings UP for small lot & flag lot DR for flag lot, map, & dwellings RESIDENTIAL TENTATIVE MAPS APPROVAL 01.23.2014 (03.21.2013) INITIAL EXP. 02.23.2016 (04.01.2015) CITY EXT. (SB1185) NA (NA) (AB 333) NA (NA) (AB 208) NA (NA) (AB 116) NA (04.01.2017) 03.06.2014 04.03.2016 NA NA NA NA 04.15.2014 04.15.2016 NA NA NA NA 06.05.2014 06.15.2013 NA NA NA NA 08.05.2014 08.05.2016 NA NA NA NA 06.19.2014 07.01.2016 NA NA NA NA DR for flag lot, map, & dwellings ATTACHMENT 4 12.16.2014 12.16.2016 NA NA NA NA 09.18.2014 09.29.2016 NA NA NA NA DR for flag lot & map 11.20.2014 11.30.2016 NA NA NA NA & dwellings 02.17.2015 02.18.2017 NA NA NA NA PROJECT DESCRIPTION RELATED ENTITLEMENTS 08-0071 PM Gasser 08-0103 Sea Breeze Building 09-0126 PM Kellebrew 11-0142 PM Century Center 3-lot mixed use 11-unit commercial condo commercial 3-lot commercial COMMERCIAL TENTATIVE MAPS APPROVAL INITIAL EXP. CITY EXT. (SB1185) (AB 333) (AB 208) (AB 116) 05.21.2009 06.01.2011 NA 06.01.2013 06.01.2015 06.01.2017 and building UP for condos UP for caretaker unit 11.06.2008 11.06.2010 NA 11.06.2012 11.06.2014 11.06.2016 04.01.2010 04.13.2012 NA NA 04.13.2014 04.13.2016 02.02.2012 02.12.2014 NA NA NA 02.12.2016 Active Tentative Maps 4 of 5 16

Legislation: SB 1185 (2008) extended by one year subdivisions set to expire between 07.15.08 and 01.01.11 AB 333 (2009) extended by two years subdivisions set to expire between 07.15.09 and 01.01.12 AB 208 (2011) extended by two years subdivisions set to expire between 07.15.11 and 01.01.14 AB 116 (2013) extended by two years subdivisions and associated approvals which have not expired by 07.11.13 O2010 2 amended the Subdivision Ordinance to provide associated approvals an automatic extension commensurate with the underlying subdivision O2012 12 amended the Subdivision Ordinance to provide associated approvals an automatic extension commensurate with the underlying subdivision (AB 208) Expiration Dates: Expiration dates have not been verified to ensure that they do not fall on a weekend or City-recognized holiday ATTACHMENT 4 Disclaimer: This data is derived from the City of Napa s records and is developed and maintained solely for the convenience of the City. The City does not warrant the accuracy of this data. Updated: 23 February 2015 G:\CDD\Planning\Projects\ProjectTracking\Tracking_Other\Tracking_ActiveMaps.docx Active Tentative Maps 5 of 5 17