Based on these aforementioned issues, in the name of justice and the law, we urge the following action:

Similar documents
Peace Palace, the Hague 15 March 2007 Dewan Adat Papua

Amnesty International September 30, 2002 INDONESIA. Grave human rights violations in Wasior, Papua. 1. Introduction

Critical Response to The Tsunami Legacy Report: Presenting the True Facts about the Aceh Reconstruction Process

Lubuk Jering and PT. RAPP Resolve their Land Conflict

Pangolin Asia Fund January 2017 NAV

INDONESIA Grave human rights violations in Wasior, Papua

AUSTRALIAN WEST PAPUA ASSOCIATION

Civil society responses to large-scale land acquisitions in Tanzania and Indonesia. E. Mwangi, H. Komarudin, E. Luoga, M. Toxede

Papua. ISN Special Issue September 2006

An example of conflict resolution efforts in Indonesia

Submission Report. The Commission For The Disappeared and Victims Of Violence. (KontraS, Indonesia) Submitted to

Making the Bali Declaration Binding

HAUT-COMMISSARIAT AUX DROITS DE L HOMME OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS PALAIS DES NATIONS 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND

NHEK SARIN, SK ADVISOR MARCH 27, 2014 SK OFFICE

BALOKOMA LIMITED RELOG PROJECT SITUATIONAL REPORT- PULPUL WARD

Civil Society and Human Rights in Aceh after the Tsunami

PAPUA DIGEST. Amnesty International

HAUT-COMMISSARIAT AUX DROITS DE L HOMME OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS PALAIS DES NATIONS 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND

amnesty international

CAMBODIA: A case for moratorium on the sale of indigenous lands

The Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous People - Access to Justice. Cambodia Indigenous Youth Association (CIYA)

Palm Oil. West Papua Indonesia Risk Mitigation Guide. Version 1.0 l August 2017 COUNTRY SPECIFIC TOOLS

WOMEN S ROLE IN SOME ECONOMIC SECTORS. By: SRI NATIN

PONTIANAK STATEMENT ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND AGRIBUSINESS IN SOUTH EAST ASIA

Appendix B: Using Laws to Fight for Environmental Rights

Forest Peoples Programme

Response Statement to the Status Report by Rainforest Action Network ( RAN ) titled Conflict Palm Oil in Practice

MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

Introduction. - RSPO Standards and FPIC - Cross reference of other criteria - P&C review and FPIC implementation 5/11/2012

Human Rights Council

4 New Zealand s statement in Geneva to the Indonesian government specific to Papua was as follows:

Indonesia Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review

Analysis paper on the ceasefire process between the Karenni National Progressive Party (KNPP) and the Burmese government in the last six months

ACT. To reform the law on forests; to repeal certain laws; and to provide for related matters.

RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Brief summary of concerns about human rights violations in the Chechen Republic RECENT AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL CONCERNS 1

Conflict Palm Oil In Practice: Exposing KLK s role in Rainforest Destruction, Land Grabbing and Child Labor

NATIVE CUSTOMARY RIGHST (NCR) OVER LAND IN SARAWAK, MALAYSIA. By Baru Bian Advocate & Solicitor High Court, of Sarawak & Sabah MALAYSIA

Law No. 26 Year Establishing the Ad Hoc Human Rights Court

Human Rights and the Environment in West Papua, Indonesia Papuan human rights defenders in dialogue with the European Union

University of Arizona Indigenous Peoples Law and Policy Program. Universal Period Review: Belize. 10 November 2008

Picture of Women s Life Devastation by Mining In East Kalimantan, Indonesia

Regarding Palm Oil Land Conflict and Community Consultation in Cross River State, Nigeria

MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

members of Liberian communities resisting EPO efforts to take their land.

Promotion and Protection of Human Rights on the Ground The case of Migrant workers.

Economic and Social Council

COUNTRY PERSPECTIVES ON GOVERNANCE FOR REDD+ INDONESIA. Brazzaville, Republic of Congo 23 October 2012

General Assembly IMPLEMENTATION OF GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION 60/251 OF 15 MARCH 2006 ENTITLED HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL

Aceh Conflict Monitoring Update 1 st 31 st May 2006 World Bank/DSF

MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

South Sudan. Legislative Developments JANUARY 2014

The Human Rights Situation in Papua

our structures and providing and expanding basic social services in the areas of health, education, gender equality, youth empowerment, and more.

RULES FOR BUSINESS RIGHTS FOR PEOPLE ASIA IN FOCUS

INDIGENOUS PEOPLES' PLAN OF IMPLEMENTATION ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

January 2009 country summary Indonesia

REPORT ON MONITORING OFAPP S FPIC IMPLEMENTATION IN PT. OKI MILL PULP AND PAPER, SOUTH SUMATRA - INDONESIA

Analysis of the Human Rights Situation in Papua, April July 2009 Papua in a Cycle of Conflict: Violence is still occurring Yusman Conoras 1

Amnesty International briefing on the deteriorating human rights situation in Aceh for participants in the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), July 2001

Domestic Workers. in Indonesia. Addressing the Urgent Protection Needs of Indonesian Domestic Workers. Q&A - Domestic Workers.

VERIFICATION REPORT ON GRIEVANCE THROUGH REPORT

Advancing Natural Autonomy in the Negeri of Honitetu Nudua Siwa, West Seram Pitony Tebiary Member of Saniri Honitetu

THE HILL TRIBES OF NORTHERN THAILAND: DEVELOPMENT IN CONFLICT WITH HUMAN RIGHTS - REPORT OF A VISIT IN SEPTEMBER 1996

KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA. Impunity in Kampot Province: the death of Chhoern Korn. Introduction. Background

NOTICE 143 OF 2015 RE-PUBLICATION OF THE DRAFT NATIONAL FORESTS AMENDMENT BILL, 2015 INVITATION FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS

Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.

Report on the Human Rights Situation in Burma

HAUT-COMMISSARIAT AUX DROITS DE L HOMME OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS PALAIS DES NATIONS 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND

June 30, Hold Security. g civil war. many. rights. Fighting between. the Sudan. and Jonglei

Thematic Report on Freedom of Association and Peaceful Assembly in the context of the exploitation of natural resources

Save our sacred forests!

Submitted by: Commission of the Churches on International Affairs of the World Council of Churches (NGO with general consultative status)

Presented by Luis M. Valdivieso Ambassador of Peru June 2009

Check against delivery. Statement by Dr. Sima Samar Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Sudan. Human Rights Council

PERU. Violence during Crowd Control Operations JANUARY 2013

Working Paper No. 36:

originates. The name is from the Mam language and was usurped by the company when it called the hydroelectric Project, TALCANAC S. A.

Risks of corruption in REDD+ in Indonesia

Papun Situation Update: Bu Tho Township, July to October 2012

Touching the Sky: Human Rights Violations and Land Right Conflicts around Bakrie Sumatera s Plantations

January 2007 Country Summary Indonesia

SKBN CU Humanitarian Update. May 2017

Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC) INDONESIA

Evaluating Integrated Conservation & Development at Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda. Julia Baker 29 th November 2012 Oxford Brookes

Unwinding Colonialism, Lessons from the Front Line

Conflict Resolution Pilot Last Updated: January 31, 2017

INDONESIA: RESOURCES AND CONFLICT IN PAPUA

I have the honour to address you in my capacity as Special Rapporteur on the right to food pursuant to Human Rights Council resolution 22/9.

HAUT-COMMISSARIAT AUX DROITS DE L HOMME OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS PALAIS DES NATIONS 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND

STATE OF SABAH. No. 7 of 2000

FORESTS ACT CHAPTER 385 LAWS OF KENYA

Churchill Mining PLC and Planet Mining Pty Ltd v. Republic of Indonesia. (ICSID Case No. ARB/12/14 and 12/40)

European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2012 on the situation in Syria (2012/2543(RSP)) The European Parliament,

Nepal. Transitional Justice and Accountability JANUARY 2018

Understanding Vulnerability and Property Rights

REGULATION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER18 OF 2014 ON PROTECTION AND EMPOWERMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN SOCIAL CONFLICTS

The Land of Papua: a continuing struggle for land and livelihoods

Agrarian Dispute Settlement on Land Resources: Right to Cultivate Plantation - (Case Study in District of Ngancar, Kediri Regency)

DEVELOPING ECONOMY IN THE BORDER OF EAST KALIMANTAN

TANGGUH INDEPENDENT ADVISORY PANEL FIRST REPORT ON OPERATIONS PHASE OF THE TANGGUH LNG PROJECT JANUARY 2011

Transcription:

Letter of Protest Concerning the PT Menara Wasior case in Wondama Bay Regency To: 1. The President of the Republic of Indonesia 2. The Indonesian Environment and Forestry Minister Respectfully, We are writing regarding the permit to release state forest lands in the Wosimi River area, Naikere and Kuriwamesa sub-districts, Wondama Bay Regency, Papua Barat province that was issued to oil palm plantation company PT Menara Wasior on the 20 th September 2017, decree SK No. 16/1/PKH/PMDH/2017. We wish to protest strongly about this permit and the policy which underlies it. Back in 2015 we sent a letter protesting about PT Menara Wasior s plans and asked the government not to process PT Menara Wasior s request that state forest land be released for an oil palm plantation. There were multiple reasons for this: 1. The area of forest in question is the customary land and living space of the Wondamen, Torowar and Mairasi ethnic groups, who were the victims of the human rights violations known as the 2001 Bloody Wasior events, which still remains unresolved to this day. The people in the area are still traumatised and they do not have the freedom of expression to make a decision about development projects on their customary lands. Because of this, the granting of this permit goes against any sense of justice, it neither respects nor protects the indigenous people s legal rights, and it disregards their right to feel safe and their right to determine their own path of development. 2. PT Menara Wasior s plantation will threaten the loss of the forest which is the source of life for local indigenous people. This forest is the source of their livelihoods, their income, their food and water, their medicines, the groves that are passed from generation to generation, sacred places, etc. 3. This policy is incompatible with the government s commitment to issue a moratorium on oil palm permits, and its commitment to sustainable development. Based on these aforementioned issues, in the name of justice and the law, we urge the following action: 1. The President should take immediate action to find a settlement to the 2001 Bloody Wasior human rights violation, rehabilitate and restore the victims rights, in a fair way

which shows respect to the victims and their families. The same should also apply to all other cases of human rights violations throughout the Land of Papua. 2. The Environment and Forestry Minister should immediately revoke the forest release permit issued to PT Menara Wasior because it violates the fundamental rights of Papuan indigenous people and has the potential to exacerbate existing problems or create other social conflicts. (A chronology is attached below). 3. Another important action is to acknowledge, protect and respect indigenous people and their rights to land, forest and other natural wealth. Jakarta, 23 March 2018 Yours respectfully, Yayasan Pusaka Foker LSM Papua KPKC GKI Tanah Papua Walhi Papua Wongkei Institute JERAT Papua SKP KC Fransiskan Papua Perkumpulan Belantara Perkumpulan Bin Madag Kom Papua Forest Watch Copies sent to: 1. Head of the Capital Investment Coordinating Board 2. Director-General for Planology at the Environment and Forestry Ministry 3. Cabinet Secretary 4. The Presidential Chief of Staff at the President s Staff Office 5. The Head of the National Human Rights Commission 6. Papua Barat Provincial Governor Contact Person: Franky Samperante (Tel. +62 813 1728 6019) Stephanus Marani (Tel. +62 812 9453 5639)

A CHRONOLOGY OF NATURAL RESOURCE EXPLOITATION AND VIOLENCE IN WASIOR In 2001: as the Bloody Wasior events unfolded between March and October 2001, a string of protest actions took place against the logging companies operating in the area: PT Wapoga Mutiara Timber (WMT), PT Dharma Mukti Persada (DMP, a subsidiary of Kayu Lapis Indonesia Group), CV Vatika Papuana Perkasa (VPP). The reason for the actions was that these companies had not met their obligations or fulfilled the promises of development they had made to the local people. Subsequently, after some violent protests, officers from the Police Mobile Brigade (Brimob) got involved to provide security for the companies and tensions mounted, until some acts of deadly violence occurred. In June 2001, the Papuan Police HQ, with the support of the XVII Trikora Regional Military Command launched the Operasi Tuntas Matoa sweeping operation. This major sweeping operation to track down the killers of some policemen started in nearby villages and eventually reached areas such as Nabire and Serui. Many villagers who knew nothing whatsoever about the issue were also arrested without a warrant, held in custody, beaten up and shot. 51 houses of local people were burnt along with all their possessions in eight different locations (Wasior city, Wondamawi, Wondiboi, Senderaboi, Sanoba and Ambuni villages, as well as Yopenggar and Sanoba in Nabire Regency). Gardens were destroyed and farm animals killed. According to the report of the Humanitarian Team for the 2001 Wasior case, there were 94 known cases of innocent civilians arrested, amongst which some experienced mild or severe torture, or were even left with disabilities for life. People also fled the area en masse. The results of the investigation carried out by the National Human Rights Commission s Study Team on Human Rights Problems in Papua, stated that during the whole period the people who were believed to have carried out the killings were being pursued, people were killed, others were tortured, including tortured to death, and there were forced disappearances and rapes in several locations. Four cases of people who died were recorded, one case of sexual abuse, five disappearances and 39 cases of torture. The Human Rights Commission passed the dossier on this case to the Attorney General s office in July 2015. The AGO returned it several times (in July 2013 and June 2014), but the National Human Rights commission have continued to resubmit it (in September 2004, December 2004, September 2013 and on the 17 th July 2014). In early May 2017 in Geneva, Switzerland, the Indonesian Government, represented by foreign minister Retno Marsuhi speaking to the UN Human Rights Council during the Universal Periodic Review hearing, expressed the Indonesian Government s commitment to establish a human rights court as outlined in law 26/2000. However, there is still no evidence that any trial process will be set out.

2009: New concessions and Continuing Violence Amidst the lack of clarity in reaching a settlement about the Bloody Wasior human rights violation, the Forestry Minister granted a logging permit to PT Kurnia Tama Sejahtera (KTS, a company belonging to the Artha Graha group). The permit, with reference SK.648/MenhutII/2009, was located in PT DMP s former concession area, and was for an area of 115,800 hectares. The government and company never consulted with the local indigenous community or sought their support before the permit was granted. The company offered compensation money and promises of development. The Mairasi, Miere, Torowa and Wondamen ethnic groups, never gave their free consent, and opposed the plan, because they were still traumatised by the events of the past (ie. Bloody Wasior). In January 2013, violence took place once more as three residents of Sararti and Ambumi villages were punched and tortured by members of army battalion Yonif 753 from Sorong at PT KTS log compound in Ambuni and at the KM48 company basecamp. In February 2013, community leaders from Sararti, Wosimo, Inyora, Undurari, Oyaa and Yawore villages, Naikere sub-district, wrote a statement expressing the indigenous community s opposition to PT. KTS operations. 2013: Wijaya Sentosa and unpaid debts In 2013, the Forestry Minister once again issued a logging permit, this time to PT Wijaya Sentosa (WS, subsidiary of the Sinar Wijaya Group), with permit reference SK.33/Menhut- II/2013, dated 15 th January 2013, and for a location stretching from Kuri Wamesa sub-district to Nikiwar sub-district. This concession borders on that of PT KTS. Previously, PT WS concession belonged to PT WMT which had not been active in the area since the Bloody Wasior events. The company left owing many debts, including compensation to indigenous landowners for commercial timber species which had already been felled, as well as the promised development projects which had not been fully realised. The people from the Dusner, Kuri and Wamesa ethnic groups, who are the customary owners of the concession land and live in the area, weren t able to oppose the arrival of PT WS on their lands either. Army and Brimob guards oversaw all the company s work, from when it asked for the community s agreement to the annual work plan to transporting logs to the logging compound. The company was working without heeding what the people were saying. Sacred forests were destroyed, commercial timber species were felled all along the course of the river and even along the shoreline, rivers were silted up with mud so they stopped flowing and sago groves died. Despite all this, the company was able to obtain a sustainable forestry certificate [from the FSC]. 2017: Threatened Deforestation for Oil Palm During Susilo Bambang Yudhuyono s presidency, Forestry Minster Zulkifli Hasan issued an inprinciple permit to release forest estate land for an oil palm plantation to PT Menara Wasior

(MW, associated with the Salim Group), in the lowlands along the Wosimi River near Ambuni Village, Kuriwamesa sub-district, for 32,170 hectares. The concession also shares a border with PT KTS s logging concession. Then in 2017, the government issued a forest release permit to PT Menara Wasior with reference SK No. 16/1/PKH/PMDH/2017, dated 20 September 2017. The company had visited the area several times to present its plans and consult on its environmental impact assessment, but the community opposed the plans and did not attend the meetings. In 2015, Pusaka sent a protest letter to the Environment and Forestry Minister, asking to halt the process of issuing a permit to release state forest to PT MW in line with the demands and opposition of local people, and because it was inappropriate to bring new companies to the area before problems of the past were resolved, notably the human right violations and other incidents that had occurred in the area. The government did not respond to this letter, and did not act consistently with its stated policy to implement a moratorium on oil palm plantations. The natural forest around the Wosimi river is now threatened with deforestation. Local people from the Wondamen ethnic group will directly feel the effects of this plan. Ancestral forest, sacred places and sago groves which are passed from generation to generation, including the areas known as Sanebuh, Iwagasi and Koine, will be lost forever. Areas which people find the resources to support their livelihoods will be cleared and the people will lose their sources of food and income. Aside from the oil palm company, another threat has arisen from a plan to mine gold in the area. In 2014, the Wondama Bay local government issued an exploration permit to PT Abisha Bumi Persada, with number 543/06A/BUP-TW/2014, also located in Kuriwamesa, Rasiei and Naikere sub-districts, an area of 23,324 hectares. This company is currently engaging in consultations for its EIA study. The Salim Group in Papua PT Menara Wasior is believes to still be linked with the giant Salim Group, belonging to the family of the late Sudono Salim (Liem Sioe Liong). In the Soeharto era, Sudono Salim was known as a crony of Soeharto and owned a logging business in Papua through PT Hanurata. In Papua, oil palm companies linked to the Salim Group are PT Rimbun Sawit Papua (RSP,2014), located in Bomberay and Tomage sub-districts, Fakfak Regency (10,102 ha), PT Suber Karunia Raya (SKR, 2014), located in Maskona sub-district Bintuni Bay Regency (38770 ha) and PT Bintuni Agro Prima Perkasa (BAPP, 2014) located in Kebar, Tambrauw Regency (19369 ha). The Salim Group s expansion in Papua has been met with protests from opponents. In Tambrauw, local people have protested because the commodity planted by PT BAPP does not correspond to its permits and it threatens the local environment.