Tara A. Newman v. Wonderful Miracle Hospital, Dr. Sharpest Blade, Ima Smartone, RN and Sharron D. Blame, RN EXHIBITS

Similar documents
Second, you must not be influenced by sympathy, passion or prejudice in favor of any party or against any of the parties.

Function of the Jury Burden of Proof and Greater Weight of the Evidence Credibility of Witness Weight of the Evidence

NO. 07-CI JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION TEN (10) JUDGE IRV MAZE TONIA FREEMAN PLAINTIFF. BECKER LAW OFFICE, PLC, et al.

CO:MMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY 28th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT PULASKI CIRCUIT COURT DMSION.1 CML ACTION NO. 17-CI INSTRUCTIONS OF THE COURT

Preparing the Physician for Deposition and Trial

Schoolcraft v. The City Of New York et al Doc. 553

Follow this and additional works at:

3:05-cv MBS Date Filed 05/08/13 Entry Number 810 Page 1 of 16

Loss of a Chance. What is it and what does it mean in medical malpractice cases?

Pursuant to Rule 50(b), Ala. R. Civ. Proc., Defendant, Mobile Infirmary Association,

MODEL MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE CHARGE AND VERDICT SHEET. MOTOR VEHICLE VOLUME REPLACEMENT JUNE

HEALTHCARE PROVIDER LIABILITY IN WEST VIRGINIA UPDATE ON THE LAW

Courtesy of RosenfeldInjuryLawyers.com (888)

GENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to

PLAINTIFF'S SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS. Civil No Judge Barry Lawrence. Tier 3

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 1. Members of the jury, the instructions I gave at the. instructions I gave you earlier, as well as those I give

In The. Court of Appeals. Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont NO CV. CHRISTUS ST. ELIZABETH HOSPITAL, Appellant

9 of their attorneys you have learned the conclusion which 10 each party believes should be drawn from the evidence

ER 904 is Scary - Five Practice Tips for Using and Opposing ER 904 Submissions Robert Dawson

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D & 5D06-874

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE OCTOBER 2, 2000 Session

Evidence in Malpractice Cases: Funk v. Bonham

1 2 IN THE MATTER OF ARBITRATION BETWEEN vs., Claimant,, M.D.,, M.D. Respondents.. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 14478

SPRING 2009 May 7, 2009 FINAL EXAM SAMPLE ANSWER MULTIPLE CHOICE

(Reprinted with amendments adopted on May 19, 2015) SECOND REPRINT S.B Referred to Committee on Judiciary

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

[to use his best judgment in the treatment and care of his patient] 3

Howard v. Univ. of Med. & Dentistry of N.J., 172 N.J. 537, 558 (2002). 463.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT MEMPHIS February 24, 2010 Session

ENTRY ORDER 2011 VT 115 SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO FEBRUARY TERM, 2011

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellee No. 188 MDA 2012

COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT VERSUS. Judgment Rendered September. Appealed from the. In and for the Parish of East Baton Rouge State of Louisiana

FOURTH DISTRICT CERTIFIES CLAIMS BILL QUESTION AS ONE OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE.

(Use for claims arising on or after 1 October For claims arising before 1 October 2011, use N.C.P.I. Civil )

No th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT'S CHARGE

I N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

Mancuso v Kaleida Health 2011 NY Slip Op 34241(U) June 24, 2011 Supreme Court, Erie County Docket Number: I Judge: Donna M.

Tort Reform (2) The pleading specifically asserts that the medical care has and all medical records

Plaintiff : CASE NO Judge Joseph T. Clark v. : Magistrate Anderson M. Renick

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

MEDICAL MALPRACTICE INDIRECT EVIDENCE OF NEGLIGENCE ONLY ( RES IPSA LOQUITUR )

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

by the negligence of the defendant in treating the plaintiff s emergency medical condition 2?"

Robert A. Rees [State Bar No ] Rees Law Firm P.C Century Park East, Suite 2000 Los Angeles, California Telephone: (310) 27

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

Case 1:13-cv WMN Document 102 Filed 01/07/15 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2014 PATRICIA CHANCE, ET AL. BON SECOURS HOSPITAL, ET AL.

COUNSEL JUDGES OPINION

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Lacy, Hassell, and Koontz, JJ., and Whiting, Senior Justice. April 18, 1997

NO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

JUDGE DENISE POSSE LINDBERG STOCK CIVIL JURY INSTRUCTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE FILED

CAUSE NO IN THE INTEREST OF IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHILDS NAME CHILDREN COUNTY, TEXAS A CHILD 15TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CHARGE OF THE COURT

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Coroners Act. Purpose: Where the Act Applies: How the Act Works

2:16-cv EIL # 106 Page 1 of 20

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2011

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

If this opinion indicates that it is FOR PUBLICATION, it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

PAGE 1 OF 8 N.C.P.I. Civil MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE DIRECT EVIDENCE OF NEGLIGENCE ONLY. GENERAL CIVIL VOLUME JUNE

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

Negligence: Elements

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT BOBBIE JEAN PATIN VERSUS. Judgment Rendered June Appealed from the

Certiorari not Applied for COUNSEL

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D CORRECTED

Standard Interrogatories. Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j)

Case 3:04-cv JEC Document 91 Filed 07/22/2005 Page 1 of 9 ORDER. of the Court's Order dated June 9, 2005.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ALASKA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA Case No. 4D Florida Bar No

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Pesa v. Mitchell, et al., No. A (App. Div.)

Wright, Berger, Beachley,

Alpena County. Version 1.0 JURY DUTY HANDBOOK

Katherine Gallo, Esq. Discovery Referee, Special Master, and Mediator

A REVIEW OF OKLAHOMA S 2003 AND 2004 TORT REFORM

Siegel v Engel Burman Senior Hous. at E. Meadow, LLC 2010 NY Slip Op 33833(U) October 21, 2010 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: 6709/09 Judge:

Malpractice: The Legal Point of View

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 25, 2010 Session

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

WHEN DOES A LOST-OPPORTUNITY CLAIM EXIST? While the second sentence of MCL a(2) provides a causation standard

TITLE 4 LUMMI NATION CODE OF LAWS TRIBAL COURT RULES OF PROCEDURE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 23, 2010

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Defendants. Case No. 07-cv-296-DRH MEMORANDUM & ORDER

MODEL JURY SELECTION QUESTIONS

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

18. PERFORMANCE AND DISCHARGE. Presented by Marisa Schatz, Georgiana Battisonnicol And Nancy Mora 10/28/2015

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellee No. 679 WDA 2012

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No.

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 5 September 2006

I N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

Dual Sole Proximate Causes: Asserting an Effective Oxymoronic Defense

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PETITIONERS BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

The Impact of the Texas Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement Act on Informed Consent Recovery in Medical Malpractice Litigation

v. Record No OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN March 5, 2004 GEORGE E. WALLACE

Transcription:

Tara A. Newman v. Wonderful Miracle Hospital, Dr. Sharpest Blade, Ima Smartone, RN and Sharron D. Blame, RN EXHIBITS

Exhibit One

Exhibit Two

Exhibit Three

Exhibit Four

Exhibit Five

Exhibit Six

Exhibit Seven

Exhibit Eight

Exhibit Nine

Exhibit Ten

Exhibit Eleven

Exhibit Twelve

Exhibit Thirteen

Exhibit Fourteen

Final Instruction # 1 Medical malpractice is a form of negligence. A health care provider commits an act of malpractice when the health care provider fails to exercise the degree of reasonable care and skill in providing health care to a patient as would be exercised by a reasonably careful, skillful and prudent health care provider acting under the same or similar circumstances. The malpractice may consist of doing something that the health care provider should not have done under the circumstances, or the failure to do something that the health care provider should have done under the circumstances.

Final Instruction # 2 A health care provider treating a patient has a duty to use that degree of care and skill ordinarily possessed by other health care providers practicing in the same field. If a health care provider exercises sound judgment in the diagnosis and treatment of a patient, and uses ordinary care and skill in treating a patient, then the health care provider is not responsible for medical malpractice. Medical treatment is not malpractice simply because it does not turn out as it was supposed to have.

Final Instruction # 3 In order for the Plaintiff to recover in this case, Plaintiff has the burden of proving the following elements by a preponderance of the expert evidence: (1) That defendants care and treatment of plaintiff fell below the appropriate standard of care; (2) That defendant failure to meet the appropriate standard of care caused plaintiff harm and/or was a substantial factor in increasing the risk of future harm to plaintiff; and (3) Had defendants met the appropriate standard of care, plaintiff had a chance of avoiding future harm. The Estate of Ms. Newman may not recover for any damages which you find would have occurred no matter what medical care or treatment was rendered to Tara Newman. If the Estate fails to prove any one of these elements by a preponderance of the evidence, it cannot recover. The defendants have no burden of disproving them.

Final Instruction # 4 Physicians are allowed wide range in exercising their judgment and discretion. When other approved methods of treatment are available, the physician must exercise his sound judgment in choosing the treatment. The fact that other methods existed or that another physician would have used a different treatment does not establish malpractice.

Final Instruction # 5 In deciding whether Dr. Blade and the nurses used reasonable care and skill in treating Tara Newman, you must consider only the expert testimony of health care providers. You cannot set up a standard of your own, but you must be guided in that regard by the testimony of health care providers qualified to render opinions regarding the standard of care. If you are unable to determine from the testimony of experts what constitutes reasonable care and skill on medical issues under the circumstances of this case, then there is a failure of proof, and the evidence is, therefore, insufficient to warrant a verdict for the Plaintiff.

Final Instruction # 6 You are to determine whether the health care providers were negligent as alleged by the Plaintiff based upon the facts known to the health care providers as they existed at the time of treatment and the applicable standards of medical treatment. You are not to utilize retrospection or hindsight.

Final Instruction # 7 You should not permit sympathy for, or prejudice against, any of the parties in this action to influence your verdict, but your verdict should be a true verdict in accordance with the law as given to you by the Court and the evidence as given in this cause.

Verdict Form # 1 We, the Jury, find for the Defendants and against the Plaintiff, Estate of Tara A. Newman. Date Foreperson

Verdict Form # 2 We, the Jury, find for Plaintiff, Estate of Tara A. Newman, and against the Defendants, Wonderful Miracle Hospital and it nurses, Ima Smartone and Sharron D. Blame. Date Foreperson

Verdict Form # 3 We, the Jury, find for the Plaintiff, Estate of Tara A. Newman, and against Sharpest Blade, M.D. Date Foreperson

Verdict Form # 4 We, the Jury, find for the Plaintiff, Estate of Tara A. Newman, and against all Defendants. Date Foreperson

How does the jury find? 1. We, the jury, find for the Defendants against the Plaintiff, Estate of Tara A. Newman 2. We, the jury, find for the Plaintiff, Estate of Tara A. Newman against the defendants, Wonderful Miracle Hospital, and its nurses Smartone and Blame 3. We the jury, find for the Plaintiff, Estate of Tara A. Newman, and against Sharpest Blade 4. We, the jury, find for the Plaintiff, Estate of Tara A. Newman, and against all Defendants 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 2 3 4