WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the Unified Development Code as Ordinance on December 8, 2008; and,

Similar documents
CITY OF MERCER ISLAND ORDINANCE NO. 02C-09

ORDINANCE NO

#962 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE OFTHE BOROUGH OF OCEANPORT, MONMOUTH COUNTY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY TO ESTABLISH THE RMW ZONE DISTRICT

FRANCONIA TOWNSHIP ORDINANCE #383

City of Calistoga Staff Report

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1312

ORDINANCE NO. 735 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEDWIG

City of Grass Valley ilw_:. [:] Agenda Action Sheet. Joe C. Heckel, Community Development Direct Thomas Last, Planning Director

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS:

Public hearing to adopt Ordinance 1375 C.S. amending Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the Martinez Municipal Code

ORDINANCE NO. NORTHAMPTON TOWNSHIP BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

CITY OF MELISSA, TEXAS

Borough of Berwick ORDINANCE

CITY OF WEST LAKE HILLS. AMENDMENT No. 252 BUILDING HEIGHT

TOWNSHIP OF WORCESTER MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF PALMDALE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA ORDINANCE NO. 1423

CITY OF SNOHOMISH Snohomish, Washington ORDINANCE 2325

PRESENTED: January 15, 2008 FILE: / BYL 1984

ORDINANCE NO. 17-' NORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP, WASHTENAW COUNTY Ml

WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners adopted the restated Pasco County Land Development Code on October 18, 2011 by Ord. No.

AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF SPARKS AMENDING TITLE 20 TO INCLUDE STANDARDS FOR URBAN AGRICULTURE AND OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO.

ORDINANCE NO. 553 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF


ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, the Town of Montverde regulates permitting and setbacks for canopies and accessory buildings; and

Appendix A: Draft Billboard Ordinance

OF THE CODIFIED ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF FREEPORT ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FREEPORT, ILLINOIS THIS DAY OF, 2018

Public Hearing Published 11/16/2017 First Reading 12/07/2017 Public Hearing 12/07/2017 Adopted 12/21/2017 ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE 11-O-14 { }{

NOTICE OF ADOPTED CHANGE TO A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR LAND USE REGULATION

(Use this form to file a local law with the Secretary of State.)

CITY COUNTY ZIP CODE ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE

ORDINANCE NO * * * * * WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mont Belvieu, Texas, ( City ) is

Attachment 2. Planning Commission Resolution No Recommending a Zone Text Amendment

Chicken Keeping Registration Application City of Eden Prairie

Council Agenda Report

ORDINANCE. D. The Planning Commission shall be vested with the authority to approve or disapprove Lot Add-on plans.

CITY OF CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA ORDINANCE NO.

City of Coral Gables Planning Department Staff Report

MEMORANDUM. TA : Amendments to Chapter 27, Zoning

Honorable Mayor Bill Agan and members of the Richland Hills City Council. Zoning Ordinance Change as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission

SHOHOLA TOWNSHIP ORDINANCE # 53 REGULATING E-911 STREET & HOUSE NUMBER SIGNS

CITY OF SANIBEL ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE NO Ordinance No Page 1 of 7. Language to be added is underlined. Language to be deleted is struck through.

Ordinance No. 24 of 2018 died due to a lack of a motion to adopt. Reintroduced as Ordinance No. 34 of Egg Harbor Township. Ordinance No.

BILL ORDINANCE 10003

ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Section of the Los Angeles Municipal Code by amending the zoning map.

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LOS BANOS AMENDING ARTICLE 28 CHAPTER 3 TO TITLE 9 OF THE LOS BANOS MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO SIGNS

CITY OF DELAND FLORIDA REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION MAY Attachments for Acres X Ordinance. Approved by.

ORDINANCE NO The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

ORDINANCE NUMBER

AMENDMENTS TO CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF GARFIELD ZONING ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Waukee:

Anne Marie Gaura, City Manager Jo Ellen Charlton, Community Development Director Dan Olson, Principal Planner

AMENDMENTS TO PROTECTIVE COVENANTS AND BILLS OF ASSURANCE March _i_. 2006

ORDINANCE NO. O

ORDINANCE NO NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GOLDEN, COLORADO:

ORDINANCE Borough of Metuchen County of Middlesex State of New Jersey

City Attorney's Synopsis

City CQ)f WesiwCQ)Jrth Village 31]1 Bm ' ~o:n JHljl1 IRo 'Il '~ VVest-wodh Village, T :g: ]Pax ll7.7jlo.2501

TOWNSHIP OF CLARK Ordinance No. Adopted. Introduced: January 20, 2015 Public Hearing: February 17, Motion: O Connor Motion:

DRAFT CITY OF SAMMAMISH WASHINGTON

Board of County Commissioners. Request to Schedule Public Hearing to Consider Amendment to Zoning Ordinance to Include Secondary Dwelling Additions

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODINVILLE, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 112 (ZONING) OF THE 1976 CODE OF THE COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 18

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING CHICKEN HEN AND RABBIT PERMITS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL LIMITS

ORDINANCE # Page 1 of 6

Building Code TITLE 15. City Uniform Dwelling Code Reserved for Future Use

TOWN OF SEWALL S POINT

CLAY COUNTY BUILDING HEIGHT ORDINANCE. Effective:

The Planning and Zoning Commission met in a regular meeting with the following members present:

Item 8C 1 of 17

CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE ORDINANCE NO. 2645

SIGN REGULATIONS Exterior signs have a substantial impact on the character and quality of the environment.

amending the Zoning Law of the Town of Livingston in relation to solar energy uses

BOROUGH OF MENDHAM MORRIS COUNTY, NEW JERSEY ORDINANCE #8-12

ORDINANCE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF WELLINGTON, COLORADO THAT:

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE, TEXAS, ADOPTING THE THE "UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARDS", AS

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE JURISDICTION OF,

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MANTECA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

CITY OF TYLER CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONCORD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MUSTANG, OKLAHOMA;

CHAPTER 1 - MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

ORDINANCE NO INTRODUCED BY: ADMINISTRATION

Now, therefore be it and it is hereby ordained chapter 152 Outdoor Advertising shall read as follows:

CB District Central Business

ORDINANCE NO. Z REZONING NO

GARFIELD COUNTY ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE NO

PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE # NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, by the City Council of the City of American Canyon as follows:

City of Miami. Legislation Ordinance: File Number: 4204 Final Action Date: 10/25/2018

Part I. That Ordinance No , the City of Novi Zoning Ordinance, as amended, hereby amended to read as follows:

ORDINANCE NO IT IS ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of San Carlos as follows:

Model Zoning Ordinance

CHAPTER 21 SIGNS (eff. 2/9/2017)

ORDINANCE NO

Transcription:

BILL 3329 ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RAYMORE, MISSOURI, AMENDING SECTION 405.040(D) AND SECTION 420.070(I) OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE RAYMORE CITY CODE. WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the Unified Development Code as Ordinance 28117 on December 8, 2008; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed 26th amendment to the Unified Development Code on November 21, 2017, after notice of said hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation in Raymore, Missouri, at least fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission heard public testimony at the public hearing and has submitted its recommendation of approval to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on the proposed 26th amendment to the Unified Development Code on January 8, 2018 after notice of said hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation in Raymore, Missouri, at least fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined the amendments proposed would be in the best interest of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Raymore. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAYMORE, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 405.0409(D) of the Unified Development Code is hereby repealed in its entirety and re-enacted as follows: D. Keeping of Animals 1. Cattle, cows, horses, sheep, goats and similar domestic animals are permitted in the A and RE districts only. 2. Chickens and similar fowl are permitted in the A and RE districts, and in the R-1 district upon properties of at least three acres in size. 3. In the RE and R-1 (3-acre minimum lot size) district, maximum number of animals permitted per grazing acre, excluding building coverage, ponds and yard area around the principal dwelling, are: a. 1 head of cattle; or b. 2 sheep; or

c. 2 goats; or d. 2 horses. Limits for other animals not enumerated herein shall be determined based upon type or size of animal. Section 2. Section 420.070(I) of the Unified Development Code is hereby repealed in its entirety and re-enacted as follows: I. Solar Energy Systems Solar energy systems shall be a permitted accessory use in all districts subject to compliance with the following requirements: 1. Roof-mounted systems located on front building roofs shall not project more than 24 inches perpendicular to the point on the roof where it is mounted. 2. Roof-mounted systems shall not project above the ridge of a gabled or gambrel roof. 3. Roof-mounted systems shall not project more than four feet above the deck or parapet of a flat or mansard roof. All mounting hardware shall be screened from view according to Section 430.120A. 4. Ground-mounted systems shall not be located in any required yard. 5. Ground-mounted systems on lots under 1 acre shall not be higher than 8 feet. 6. Solar collectors designed as part of an accessory structure such as an awning or canopy shall conform to the standards for that structure. 7. Appurtenant components must be located within an enclosed structure or screened according to Section 430.120. 1. Roof Mounted and Wall Mounted Solar Energy Systems: a. Roof mounted and wall mounted Solar Energy Systems may be mounted or located on a principal or accessory building. b. Roof-mounted systems located on front building roofs shall not project more than 24 inches perpendicular to the point on the roof where it is mounted. c. Roof-mounted systems shall not project above the ridge of a gabled or gambrel roof. Bill 3329 2

d. The total height of any building equipped with an Solar Energy System shall not exceed more than 24 inches above the maximum building height specified for principal or accessory buildings within the applicable underlying zoning district. e. Applications for roof and wall mounted solar energy systems shall be accompanied by evidence and information regarding the strength of the structure in which the system will be attached. f. Construction, modification, and/or reinforcement of the structure in which the system will be attached must be in compliance with all applicable codes. g. Roof- mounted solar energy systems shall be accompanied by appropriate safety and warning signage 2. Ground Mounted Solar Energy Systems: a. In the front and side yard area, ground mounted solar energy systems must meet the minimum front and side yard setback for principal buildings within the underlying zoning district. b. In the rear yard, ground mounted solar energy systems must provide a minimum side and rear setback of 5 feet. c. Ground mounted solar energy systems are prohibited from encroaching into any approved utility easement or right-of-way, or, being placed within any stormwater management system. d. Freestanding ground mounted solar energy systems shall not exceed the maximum allowable building height within the applicable underlying zoning district. e. Total coverage of a lot with a ground mounted solar energy system shall not exceed fifty (50) percent of the lot, or the maximum allowable lot coverage for the underlying zoning district, whichever is less. f. The area beneath the ground mounted solar energy system is considered pervious. However, any use of impervious construction materials for the purposes of a foundation system is subject to the requirements found in Section 430.020A. g. Ground mounted solar energy systems shall be accompanied by appropriate safety and warning signage, and shall be safely secured to prevent Bill 3329 3

unauthorized access or entry Section 3. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be known as the twenty-sixth amendment to the Unified Development Code. Effective Date. The effective date of approval of this Ordinance shall be coincidental with the Mayor s signature and attestation by the City Clerk. Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. DULY READ THE FIRST TIME THIS 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2018. BE IT REMEMBERED THAT THE ABOVE ORDINANCE WAS APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2018 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: Councilmember Abdelgawad Councilmember Barber Councilmember Berendzen Councilmember Burke III Councilmember Holman Councilmember Kellogg Councilmember Moorhead Councilmember Townsend ATTEST: APPROVE: Jean Woerner, City Clerk Kristofer P. Turnbow, Mayor Date of Signature Bill 3329 4

To: From: Planning and Zoning Commission City Staff Date: January 22, 2018 Re: Case #17033: 26th Amendment to the UDC Misc. from 2017 Annual Review GENERAL INFORMATION cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc Applicant : City of Raymore Requested Action: 26th Amendment to the Unified Development Code Miscellaneous items from 2017 Annual Review of UDC Advertisement: Public Hearing: November 2, 2017 Journal Newspaper December 21, 2017 Journal Newspaper November 21, 2017 Planning and Zoning Commission January 8, 2018 City Council Items of Record: Exhibit 1. Growth Management Plan Exhibit 2. Unified Development Code Exhibit 3. Notice of Publication Exhibit 4. Staff Repor t TEXT AMENDMENT REQUIREMENTS ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc Chapter 470: Development Review Procedures outlines the applicable requirements for amending the text of the Unified Development Code. Section 470.020 (B) states: text amendments may be initiated by the City Council or the Planning and Zoning Commission. Section 470.020 (F) requires that a public hearing be held by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. Section 470.020 (G) (2) states: UDC 26th Amendment January 22, 2018 1

In its deliberation of a request, the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council must make findings of fact taking into consideration the following: 1. whether such change is consistent with the intent and purpose of the Unified Development Code and plans adopted by the City of Raymore. 2. whether the proposed text amendment corrects an error or inconsistency in the code; 3. the areas which are most likely to be directly affected by such change and in what way they will be affected; 4. whether the proposed amendment is made necessary because of changed or changing conditions in the areas and/or zoning districts affected by it; and 5. whether the proposed text amendment is in the best interests of the City as a whole. STAFF COMMENTS cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc 1. The 26th Amendment to the Unified Development Code (UDC) is the result of discussions held by the Planning and Zoning Commission after completing its 2017 annual review of the UDC. At its October 3, 2017 meeting the Commission discussed the results of research completed by City staff on several topics and directed staff to submit the revisions proposed in the 26th amendment. 2. The 26th amendment to the UDC consists of two (2) separate revisions proposed to the UDC. The amendments are listed in the proposed ordinance as follows: Staff recommends the following provisions of the UDC be amended for the reasons provided with each proposed change. Proposed new text is highlighted; deleted text is crossed out. Revision 1: Proposal clarifies code language related to the keeping of animals on residentially zoned lots in the City of Raymore Section 405.040D of the Unified Development Code is hereby repealed in its entirety and re-enacted as follows: D. Keeping of Animals 1. Cattle, cows, horses, sheep, goats and similar domestic animals are permitted in the A and RE districts only. 2. Chickens and similar fowl are permitted in the A and RE districts, and in the R-1 district upon properties of at least three acres in size. UDC 26th Amendment January 22, 2018 2

3. In the RE and R-1 (3-acre minimum lot size) district, maximum number of animals permitted per grazing acre, excluding building coverage, ponds and yard area around the principal dwelling, are: a. 1 head of cattle; or b. 2 sheep; or c. 2 goats; or d. 2 horses. Limits for other animals not enumerated herein shall be determined based upon type or size of animal. Revision 2 : Proposal clarifies code language related to new solar energy system installations in the City of Raymore. Section 420.070(I) of the Unified Development Code is hereby repealed in its entirety and re-enacted as follows: I. Solar Energy Systems Solar energy systems shall be a permitted accessory use in all districts subject to compliance with the following requirements: 1. Roof-mounted systems located on front building roofs shall not project more than 24 inches perpendicular to the point on the roof where it is mounted. 2. Roof-mounted systems shall not project above the ridge of a gabled or gambrel roof. 3. Roof-mounted systems shall not project more than four feet above the deck or parapet of a flat or mansard roof. All mounting hardware shall be screened from view according to Section 430.120A. 4. Ground-mounted systems shall not be located in any required yard. 5. Ground-mounted systems on lots under 1 acre shall not be higher than 8 feet. 6. Solar collectors designed as part of an accessory structure such as an awning or canopy shall conform to the standards for that structure. 7. Appurtenant components must be located within an enclosed structure or screened according to Section 430.120. 1. Roof Mounted and Wall Mounted Solar Energy Systems: a. Roof mounted and wall mounted Solar Energy Systems may be mounted or located on a principal or accessory building. b. Roof-mounted systems located on front building roofs shall not project more than 24 inches perpendicular to the point on the roof where it is mounted. UDC 26th Amendment January 22, 2018 3

c. Roof-mounted systems shall not project above the ridge of a gabled or gambrel roof. d. The total height of any building equipped with an Solar Energy System shall not exceed more than 24 inches above the maximum building height specified for principal or accessory buildings within the applicable underlying zoning district. e. Applications for roof and wall mounted solar energy systems shall be accompanied by evidence and information regarding the strength of the structure in which the system will be attached. f. Construction, modification, and/or reinforcement of the structure in which the system will be attached must be in compliance with all applicable codes. g. Roof- mounted solar energy systems shall be accompanied by appropriate safety and warning signage 2. Ground Mounted Solar Energy Systems: a. In the front and side yard area, ground mounted solar energy systems must meet the minimum front and side yard setback for principal buildings within the underlying zoning district. b. In the rear yard, ground mounted solar energy systems must provide a minimum side and rear setback of 5 feet. c. Ground mounted solar energy systems are prohibited from encroaching into any approved utility easement or right-of-way, or, being placed within any stormwater management system. d. Freestanding ground mounted solar energy systems shall not exceed the maximum allowable building height within the applicable underlying zoning district. e. Total coverage of a lot with a ground mounted solar energy system shall not exceed fifty (50) percent of the lot, or the maximum allowable lot coverage for the underlying zoning district, whichever is less. f. The area beneath the ground mounted solar energy system is considered pervious. However, any use of impervious construction materials for the purposes of a foundation system is subject to the requirements found in Section 430.020A. g. Ground mounted solar energy systems shall be accompanied by appropriate safety and warning signage, and shall be safely secured to prevent unauthorized access or entry UDC 26th Amendment January 22, 2018 4

PLANNING COMMISSION PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT bbbb Under Section 470.020 of the Unified Development Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission is directed concerning its actions in dealing with a request to amend the text of the Unified Development Code. Under 470.020 (G) (2) the Planning and Zoning Commission is directed to make findings of fact taking into consideration the following: 1. whether such change is consistent with the intent and purpose of the Unified Development Code and plans adopted by the City of Raymore; Each of the proposed amendments are consistent with the identified purpose and intent of Section 400.040 of the Unified Development Code and with the Growth Management Plan. 2. whether the proposed text amendment corrects an error or inconsistency in the code; The proposed sections of the ordinance do not correct an error or inconsistency. 3. the areas which are most likely to be directly affected by such change and in what way they will be affected; The changes would affect properties throughout the City. 4. whether the proposed amendment is made necessary because of changed or changing conditions in the areas and/or zoning districts affected by it; and The proposed amendments are generally not made necessary because of changed or changing conditions in the zoning districts. The amendments are proposed to clarify language in the code. 5. whether the proposed text amendment is in the best interests of the City as a whole. The proposed amendments are intended to better clarify language in the code which would be in the best interests of the City as a whole. REVIEW OF INFORMATION AND SCHEDULE nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn A ction Planning Commission City Council 1 st City Council 2nd Public Hearing November 21, 2017 January 8, 2018 January 22, 2018 UDC 26th Amendment January 22, 2018 5

STAFF RECOMMENDATION bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission accept the staff proposed findings of fact and forward Case #17033A, 26th amendment to the UDC, to the City Council with a recommendation of approval. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 11/21/2017 bbbbbbbb The Planning and Zoning Commission, at its November 21, 2017 meeting, voted 5-1 to accept the staff proposed findings of fact and forward Case #17033A 26th amendment to the Unified Development Code to City Council with a recommendation of approval. CITY COUNCIL ACTION 1ST READING - 1/8/2018 bbbbbbbb The City Council, at its January 8, 2018 meeting, voted 7-0 to accept the Planning and Zoning Commission proposed findings of fact and approved Case #17033A 26th amendment to the Unified Development Code on 1st reading. UDC 26th Amendment January 22, 2018 6