FOR DISTRIGT OF COLUMBIA 9fHE UNITED STATES COURT OF URAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION; BASIN ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE; EAST

Similar documents
USCA Case # Document # Filed: 10/23/2015 Page 1 of Constitution Avenue,

\{."--, Under Section 307 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7607(b), Section 706 of

ORU l;~]i ^i^totestodhhfw^

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

No (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORIGINAL RECEIVED 2 Z015 ) ) ) ) ) ) PETITION FOR ) REVIEW ) ) ) No DEC FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA C

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 10/23/2015. DISTRICT OF COWMBAaijh 1

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

NITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS RECEIVEHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT PETITION FOR REVIEW

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2, No (and consolidated cases) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

CLERK RECEIVED. JTW OR UiSThICT ØF OL tikbta. FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRC1 lit ETSY, INC., Petitioner

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 07/19/2011 Page 1 of 8 [NOT SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] No

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

18 105G. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT Oi, FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMB &!IPANIC MEDIA COALITION, Petitioner CASE NO. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCLED^^SSSmi^

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APP: AJllS--~---- PETITION FOR REVIEW. and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 15( a), the Mozilla Corporation

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT HELD DECEMBER 10, 2013 DECIDED APRIL 15, 2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

PETITION FOR REVIEW. Pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

In the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

ReCEIVED FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCU CLERK

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. CLEAN AIR COUNCIL, et al.,

Petitioners, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., BRIEF OF FIVE U.S. SENATORS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS

B t NA L. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAl. wr FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCU] f FOR DITRIT Q QCLJMHA ILtUIt

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED: OCTOBER 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 03/24/2017 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) )

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON APRIL 15, 2016] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Defendants-Appellees.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOTION OF AMERICAN CABLE ASSOCIATION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. Petitioner v. CHANBOND, LLC Patent Owner

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 39 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5. Paul M. Seby (admitted pro hac vice) Robert J. Walker (Wyo. Bar No.

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C.

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 19, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

[ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 15, 2010] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case , Document 1-1, 04/21/2017, , Page1 of 2

r!lep COURT Respondents. Petitioners, THE INTERIOR; SALLY JEWELL, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior;

ORAL ARGUMENT HEARD ON SEPTEMBER 27, No and Consolidated Cases

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 1:10-cv JDB Document 8-1 Filed 06/28/10 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:16-cv NDF Document 29 Filed 03/23/17 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ) Grid Resiliency Pricing Rule ) RM

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT MOTION TO INTERVENE IN PETITION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 09/09/2011 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 1:17-cv RMC Document 12 Filed 11/16/17 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ATTORNEYS GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS AND. January 23, 2008

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Grid Reliability and Resilience Pricing ) RM

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2 AND 3, 2016 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL STATE OF WYOMING MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendant.

Sandra Y. Snyder Regulatory Attorney for Environment & Personnel Safety

BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WYOMING

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No

PETITION FOR REVIEW. Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 402(a), 28 U.S.C. 2342(1) and 2344, and Federal

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 218 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 4

GOVERNOR AG LEGISLATURE PUC DEQ

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 09/09/2014 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petition for Review

[ORAL ARGUMENT NOT SCHEDULED] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT : : : : MOTION TO GOVERN

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT HEARD ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

American Electric Power Company v. Connecticut, 131 S. Ct (2011). Talasi Brooks ABSTRACT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement is made by and between: 1) Sierra Club; and 2)

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD APRIL 12, 2016] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFFREY ALEXANDER STERLING, and JAMES RISEN,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Transcription:

ijii - r r FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA C USCA Case #15-1484 Document #1590349 Filed: 12/22/2015 Page 1 of 6 Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units, to be Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From New, Modified, and United States Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ): Standards of cooperatives hereby petition the Court for review of the final action of Respondent Electric Cooperative Association and the above-named member rural electric and Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the National Rural Pursuant to section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7607(b)(1), PETITION FOR REVIEW Respondent. PROTECTION AGENCY, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL V. Petitioners, STATE GENERATION & TRANSMISSION KENTUCKY POWER COOPERATIVE, INC.; HOOSIER ENERGY RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION; BASIN ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE; EAST COOPERATIVE, INC.; MINNKOTA POWER COOPERATIVE, INC.; SUNFLOWER ELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION; and TRI ASSOCIATION, INC., No. URAL ELECTRIC FOR DISTRIGT OF COLUMBIA 9fHE UNITED STATES COURT OF UNITED SWS GUUk O APALS

f USCA Case #15-1484 Document #1590349 Filed: 12/22/2015 Page 2 of 6 codified at 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart TTTT (the Final Rule ). The Final Rule was published in the Federal Register at 80 Fed. Reg. 64,510 on October 23, 2015. A copy of EPA s Final Rule is attached to this Petition. This Petition is timely filed within sixty days of that publication as required by Clean Air Act section 307(b)(1). Dated: December 22, 2015 Of Counsel Respectfully submitted, / Rae Cronmiller Thomas A. L n n Environmental Counsel D.C. Cir. B o. 39 69 National Association of Rural Electric Daniel W. Wolff Cooperatives Sherrie A. Armstrong 4301 Wilson Blvd. Crowell & Moring LLP Arlington, VA 22203 1001 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. (703) 907-5500 Washington, DC 20004 rae.cronmiller@nreca.coop (202) 624-2500 tlorenzen@crowell.com Counselfor National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Sunflower Electric Power Corporation, and Tn State Generation & Transmission Association Inc. 2

USCA Case #15-1484 Document #1590349 Filed: 12/22/2015 Page 3 of 6 Christina F. Gornez Garrison W. Kaufman HoLLiND & HART LLP 555 Seventeenth Street, Suite 3200 Denver, CO 80202 Ph. 303-295-8000 / Fx.: 303-295-8261 cgomezho11andhart. corn gwkaufmanho11andhart.com Patrick R. Day HOLLAND & HART LLP 2515 Warren Avenue, Suite 450 Cheyenne, WY 82001 Ph.: 307-778-4200/Fx.: 307-778-8175 pday@hollandhart. corn 4 ( fin M. Holloway III, 494459 Sutherland Asbill & Bre6nan LLP 700 Sixth Street NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC 20001 (202) 383-0100 Jay.holloway@sutherland.com Counselfor Petitioners East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc., Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., and Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. Counselfor Petitioner Basin Electric Power Cooperative 3

USCA Case #15-1484 Document #1590349 Filed: 12/22/2015 Page 4 of 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Pursuant to agreement with Counsel for Respondent EPA, I hereby certify that I have caused to be delivered via email, in lieu of mail or hand service, a copy of the foregoing Petition for Review and accompanying documents to the following: For DOJ: Brian Lynk: brian.lynkusdoj.gov For EPA: Steven Silverman: si1verman.stevenepa.gov Dated: December 22, 2015 Thomas A. 4

USCA Case #15-1484 Document #1590349 Filed: 12/22/2015 Page 5 of 6 THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APP THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CI 1EC NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION; BASIN 1ZECTRIC COOPERATIVE; EAST KENTUCKY POWER COOPERATIVE, INC.; HOOSIER ENERGY RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.; MINNKOTA POWER COOPERATIVE, INC.; SUNFLOWER No. ELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION; and TRI STATE GENERATION & TRANSMISSION ASSOCIATION, INC., Petitioners, V. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent. RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION Pursuant to Rule 26.1 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Circuit Rule 26.1, the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association ( NRECA ) declares as follows: NRECA is the national association of rural electric cooperatives. NRECA does not have a parent corporation, and no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock. NRECA is a trade association within the meaning of Circuit Rule 26.1(b).

Respectfully submitted, USCA Case #15-1484 Document #1590349 Filed: 12/22/2015 Page 6 of 6 Dated: December 22, 2015 Cooperative Association Counselfor National Rural Electric sarmstrongcrowe11.com Washington, D.C. 20004 tlorenzen@crowell. corn dwollf@crowell. corn CR0wELL & M0R1.TG LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Aye, NW Thomas o zen Daniel olff (202) 624-2500 Sherrie A. Armstrong