SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement is made by and between: 1) Sierra Club; and 2)

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 1:10-cv JEB Document 13 Filed 08/03/11 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case 1:12-cv RPM Document 8 Filed 07/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:16-cv JDB Document 33 Filed 12/28/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:13-cv JCJ Document 23-1 Filed 05/06/14 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case 1:13-cv GK Document 27-1 Filed 04/28/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. WHEREAS, on August 10, 2011, Plaintiffs Sierra Club and WildEarth Guardians filed

Case 1:10-cv PLF Document 17 Filed 08/04/11 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:12-cv CKK Document 12 Filed 06/21/12 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv RLW Document 48 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:16-cv EGS Document 21 Filed 07/05/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 1:12-cv RBW Document 44-1 Filed 01/29/14 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv RLW Document 47-1 Filed 08/31/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER ADOPTING PROTECTIVE ORDER. (Issued January 23, 2012)

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. 1. This Settlement Agreement is entered into this 23d day. of December, 1998 (hereinafter the Effective Date ) among

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

ALABAMA SURFACE MINING COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. MEMORANDUM OPINION (June 14, 2016)

Case 1:09-cv JLK Document 80-1 Filed 02/15/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case: HJB Doc #: 1668 Filed: 04/16/15 Desc: Main Document Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE : :

Case4:12-cv PJH Document82-1 Filed02/20/14 Page1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

1.1 Transfer of Assets. At the closing, Seller shall sell, assign, transfer, and set over to Buyer, and

Case Document Filed in TXSB on 10/31/2007 Page t of 12 EXHIBIT A

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 1:12-cv JDB Document 25-2 Filed 08/20/12 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

a. Collectively, this law and regulations adopted under this title are to be known as the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Clean Air Program (CAP).

CHAPTER XX DISPUTE SETTLEMENT. SECTION 1 Objective, Scope and Definitions. ARTICLE [1] Objective. ARTICLE [2] Scope

ACCREDITATION AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WHEREAS, Portland General Electric Company ( PGE ) is an Oregon corporation;

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

Mailed Rezoning Notice Text Amendment #1 LUTI Review Redline Draft 04/27/2018

FILED. / / cjq RESOLUTION NO. R-76-16

Standing Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals

Upon the motion, dated June 20, 2009 (the Motion ), as orally modified at the

Case KRH Doc 3040 Filed 07/12/16 Entered 07/12/16 17:55:33 Desc Main Document Page 62 of 369

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE RECITALS

CITY OF RICHMOND PERFORMANCE BOND

ICB System Standard Terms and Conditions

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN SAMPLE CONTRACT NO DEVELOPMENT PARTNER

Signed June 24, 2017 United States Bankruptcy Judge

Optional Paragraphs for inclusion in the Settlement Agreement 1. MULTIPLE CHARGING PARTIES

WYNN RESORTS, LIMITED (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT. WHEREAS, Contractor wishes to provide such goods and/or services to NACCHO; ARTICLE I: SPECIAL PROVISIONS

Case 1:04-cv RWR Document 27-2 Filed 01/14/2005 Page 1 of 11

APALACHICOLA-CHATTAHOOCHEE-FLINT RIVER BASIN COMPACT

Rules for Qualified & Court-Appointed Parenting Coordinators

District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility. Board Rules

Case 1:16-cv BCM Document 25-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case KJC Doc 441 Filed 09/11/18 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

INTERAGENCY COOPERATION CONTRACT between THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL and THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

These rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.

SAMPLE DOCUMENT FOR FORMATTING ILLUSTRATION ONLY JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT

Case CSS Doc 783 Filed 09/07/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

FRESNO COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION (FCERA) ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS AND APPEALS TO THE BOARD POLICY

Case 4:05-cv Y Document 86 Filed 04/30/07 Page 1 of 7 PageID 789 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. PO Box 1911 AFIN Deer Park, TX CONSENT ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA CONSENT DECREE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case 3:15-cv MMC Document 32 Filed 08/26/16 Page 1 of 10

CONTRACT BETWEEN THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN AND ABC COMPANY INTRODUCTION

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties

Case 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 11 Filed 06/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

!! 1 Page! 2014 PEODepot. All rights reserved. PEODepot and peodepot.com are trademarks of PEODepot. INITIAL! BROKER AGREEMENT

Case 2:15-cv JCC Document 28 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BUREAU OF INDUSTRY AND SECURITY WASHINGTON, D.C ORDER RELATING TO GLS SOLUTIONS. INC.

RAYTHEON COMPANY ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE TRADING PARTNER AGREEMENT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Civil Action No.: [PROPOSED] CONSENT DECREE. Press Release.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY

ORU l;~]i ^i^totestodhhfw^

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF A PROTECTIVE ORDER

RULE 1:13. Miscellaneous Rules As To Procedure

The Department shall administer the air quality program of the State. (1973, c. 821, s. 6; c. 1262, s. 23; 1977, c. 771, s. 4; 1987, c. 827, s. 204.

SETTLEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE AGREEMENT. THIS SETTLEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ), by

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Labor Chapter ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE TABLE OF CONTENTS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND COVENANT NOT TO SUE

Transcription:

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement is made by and between: 1) Sierra Club; and 2) the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and its Administrator, Gina McCarthy (collectively EPA ). WHEREAS, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 7607(b)(1), Sierra Club on May 27, 2016, filed a petition for judicial review of the final action taken by EPA under the Clean Air Act ( CAA ) at 81 Fed. Reg. 17,248 (Mar. 28, 2016) titled Revisions to Ambient Monitoring Quality Assurance and Other Requirements ( final action ), which is currently pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in a case captioned Sierra Club v. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 16-1158; WHEREAS, Sierra Club and EPA (collectively, the Parties ) wish to implement this Settlement Agreement resolving Sierra Club s petition, without any admissions or adjudications of fact or law; WHEREAS pursuant to 40 C.F.R. 58.10 (2016), state, or where applicable local, agencies are required to submit annual monitoring network plans ( monitoring plans ) to EPA; WHEREAS EPA s September 2013 Guidance on Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) Elements under Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2) (the 2013 isip Guidance ) states that to meet CAA Section Page 1 of 10

110(a)(2)(B), the best practice for an air agency submitting an infrastructure SIP would be to submit, for inclusion into the SIP (if not already part of the SIP), the statutory or regulatory provisions that provide the air agency or official with the authority and responsibility to perform the actions listed in the 2013 isip Guidance along with a narrative explanation of how the provisions meet the requirements of CAA Section 110(a)(2)(B) (see 2013 isip Guidance, pp. 22-23); WHEREAS, the discussion at 81 Fed. Reg. at 17,251/2-3 does not alter or amend the above-cited portion of the 2013 isip guidance; WHEREAS, the Parties desire to resolve Petitioner s request for attorneys fees and costs without further litigation; WHEREAS, the Parties wish to enter into this Settlement Agreement to avoid protracted and costly litigation and to preserve judicial resources, and the Parties agree the Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable, in the public interest, and consistent with the CAA; NOW THEREFORE, the Parties, intending to be bound by this Settlement Agreement, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. Within ten business days after this Settlement Agreement is executed by the Parties, but before finalization pursuant to Paragraph 12 of this Settlement Agreement, the Parties shall file a joint motion with the Court notifying it of this Page 2 of 10

Settlement Agreement and requesting that Sierra Club s petition for review be held in abeyance as further provided herein. 2. Not later than 30 days after finalization of this Settlement Agreement, EPA will issue a guidance document ( guidance ) at the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ( OAQPS ) division director level to state and (where applicable) local monitoring agencies recommending that such agencies make monitoring plans available on their websites for public comment, and that the plans should remain available during the comment period. In addition, the guidance will recommend that states provide notification by email to interested stakeholders at the beginning of the 30-day comment period that the monitoring plan is available for comment. The guidance will further request that the state confirm in the submitted plan or cover letter thereto the timing and form of notice that was given. The guidance would not contain binding requirements, but rather recommendations on how to best implement the regulatory requirements. EPA shall provide Sierra Club a copy of the above-described guidance within ten business days of issuance thereof through its undersigned counsel. 3. Not later than 30 days after finalization of this Settlement Agreement, EPA will issue guidance at the OAQPS division director level to the EPA regional office air division directors asking that they ensure interested stakeholders are informed by email within 15 business days of monitoring plan approvals and Page 3 of 10

disapprovals by EPA, and that the approved plans are promptly made available on EPA s Ambient Monitoring Technology Information Center ( AMTIC ) web site. The guidance will further request that the regions make the plans available on the AMTIC web site within 15 business days of the action on the plan. EPA shall provide Sierra Club with a copy of this guidance within ten business days of issuance thereof through its undersigned counsel. 4. If EPA takes all the actions specified in Paragraphs 2 and 3 above within the time frames specified therein, and if the guidance documents specified in those paragraphs remain in effect and unchanged for 270 days after finalization of this settlement agreement, Sierra Club shall, no later than ten business days after such 270 th day, file an appropriate pleading seeking the dismissal of Petition for Review No. 16-1158, with prejudice, in accordance with Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. 5. If: a) EPA and/or the Attorney General determine to withdraw or withhold consent to this Settlement Agreement as described in Paragraph 12; b) EPA does not take all the actions as described in Paragraphs 2 and 3 within the time frames specified therein; or c) the guidance documents referenced in Paragraphs 2 and 3 do not remain in effect and unchanged for at least 270 days after finalization of this Settlement Agreement; then Sierra Club s sole remedy with respect to the final action at issue in this case shall be the right to ask the Page 4 of 10

Court to lift the abeyance of proceedings and establish a schedule for briefing and oral argument of the pending petition for judicial review. 6. This Settlement Agreement constitutes the sole and entire understanding of EPA and Sierra Club, and no statement, promise or inducement made by any Party to this Settlement Agreement, or any agent of such Parties, that is not set forth in this Settlement Agreement shall be valid or binding. 7. Except as expressly provided in this Settlement Agreement, none of the Parties waives or relinquishes any legal rights, claims or defenses it may have. 8. The provisions of this Settlement Agreement can be modified at any time by written mutual consent of the Parties. 9. Except as expressly provided herein, nothing in the terms of this Settlement Agreement shall be construed to limit or modify the discretion accorded EPA by the CAA or by general principles of administrative law. 10. The commitments by EPA in this Settlement Agreement are subject to the availability of appropriated funds. No provision of this Settlement Agreement shall be interpreted as or constitute a commitment or requirement that EPA obligate, expend or pay funds in contravention of the Anti-Deficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. 1341, or any other applicable appropriations law or regulation, or otherwise take any action in contravention of those laws or regulations. Page 5 of 10

11. The Parties recognize that the possibility exists that a total lapse in the appropriations that fund EPA resulting in an EPA shutdown could delay compliance with the time frames contained in this Agreement. Should a delay occur due to such a lapse in appropriations, any resulting failure to meet the time frames set forth herein shall not constitute a failure to comply with the terms of this Settlement Agreement, and any such lapse in appropriation that occurs within 90 days prior to any deadlines shall cause the deadline to be automatically extended one day for each day of the lapse in appropriations. Nothing in this Paragraph shall preclude EPA from seeking an additional extension through modification of this Settlement Agreement pursuant to Paragraph 8 nor limit Sierra Club s right to oppose any such request for an additional extension. 12. The Parties agree and acknowledge that before this Settlement Agreement is final, EPA must provide notice in the Federal Register and an opportunity for public comment pursuant to CAA Section 113(g), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g). Upon signature of the parties but before the Settlement Agreement is final, EPA shall promptly submit such notice of this Settlement Agreement to the Federal Register for publication and public comment. After this Settlement Agreement has undergone an opportunity for notice and comment, EPA and/or the Attorney General, as appropriate, shall promptly consider any such written comments in determining whether to withdraw or withhold consent to the Page 6 of 10

Settlement Agreement, in accordance with section 113(g) of the CAA. If the Administrator and/or the Attorney General elect(s) to not withdraw or withhold consent to this Settlement Agreement, this Settlement Agreement shall become final on the date that EPA provides written notice of such finality to Sierra Club through its undersigned counsel. 13. It is understood and agreed that this Settlement Agreement was jointly drafted by Sierra Club and EPA. Accordingly, the Parties hereby agree that all rules of construction to the effect that ambiguity is construed against the drafting party shall be inapplicable in any dispute concerning the terms, meaning, or interpretation of this Settlement Agreement. 14. In the event of a dispute between the Parties concerning the interpretation or implementation of any aspect of this Settlement Agreement, including, but not limited to, Paragraph 11, the disputing Party shall provide the other Party with a written notice outlining the nature of the dispute and requesting informal negotiations. If the Parties cannot reach an agreed-upon resolution within fifteen business days after receipt of the notice, any Party may move to lift the stay. 15. The parties agree to address the issue of costs of litigation, including attorney s fees, as follows: a. If the conditions specified in Paragraph 4 are fully and timely satisfied, then within 150 days of Sierra Club s filing of a pleading pursuant Page 7 of 10

to Paragraph 4 seeking dismissal of Petition for Review No. 16-1158, the United States will pay the sum of $23,454 in full settlement of Sierra Club s claims for fees and costs in this matter. Such payment shall be made pursuant to electronic payment instructions from the Sierra Club. b. If the United States makes the payment specified in subparagraph a above within the timeframe specified therein, or if Sierra Club accepts such payment thereafter, then such payment or acceptance constitutes full and final payment of all costs and fees incurred by Sierra Club in connection with the litigation. Upon such payment or acceptance, Sierra Club shall release the United States, including EPA, from any claims regarding costs (including reasonable attorneys fees) incurred in this litigation. c. If the United States fails to make timely payment as specified in subparagraph a of this paragraph, and Sierra Club does not accept such payment after the timeframe specified in subparagraph a, then Sierra Club may make application to the Court for an award of costs (including reasonable attorneys fees) in connection with the litigation without regard to the amount of the payment specified in subparagraph a. Such application shall be Sierra Club s sole remedy for any failure by the United Page 8 of 10

States to make timely payment under this Agreement, and the United States may oppose such application. d. The provisions of this paragraph shall have no force and effect if the Court lifts the abeyance of proceedings in response to a request by Sierra Club pursuant to Paragraph 5. 16. The undersigned representatives of each Party certify that they are fully authorized by the Party that they represent to bind that respective Party to the terms of this Settlement Agreement. This Settlement Agreement will be deemed to be executed when it has been signed by the representatives of the Parties set forth below, subject to final approvals pursuant to Paragraph 12. 17. This Settlement Agreement may be signed in counterparts, and such counterpart signatures shall be given full force and effect. DATE: p Z o i PHILLIP R. D U.S. Department o ice Environment and Natural Resources Division Environmental Defense Section P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044-7611 (202) 616-7501 phillip.r. dupre@usdoj. gov Counsel for EPA Page 9 of 10

DATE: () I/; D I /"'C6!7 I DAVID S. BARON Earth justice 1625 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 702 Washington, DC 20036 202-667-4500 dbaron@earthjustice.org Counsel for Sierra Club Page IO of IO