Filing # E-Filed 06/09/ :22:25 PM

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Plaintiff Sharolynn L. Griffiths, by and through her undersigned counsel, by way of JURISDICTION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 16 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO CA P

1/29/2019 8:49 AM 19CV04626

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv JTM-TJJ Document 1 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 1:08-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/16/2008 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 4:16-cv JEG-CFB Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 13

Case 8:04-cv SCB-TBM Document 32 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 1 of 6

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION

9:12-cv PMD-BHH Date Filed 09/17/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8

From Article at GetOutOfDebt.org

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT! WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN! SOUTHERN DIVISION!

Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:17-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17

Courthouse News Service

Complaint - Walmart Substance on Floor in Frozen Food Dept.

Case 5:15-cv SAC-KGS Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

Courthouse News Service

Second Amended Complaint, Gassman v. Frischholtz et al, Docket No. 1:05-cv (Northern District of Illinois 2005)

Amended Complaint, Gassman v. Frischholtz et al, Docket No. 1:05-cv (Northern District of Illinois 2005)

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

Case 8:17-cv VMC-MAP Document 28 Filed 09/28/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID 437 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY PETITION

Case 0:10-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/10/2010 Page 1 of 7

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/28/2018 Page 1 of 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII CV

CASE NO. 5:00-CV COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION ON BEHALF OF JACKQULINE STOKES

Case 3:15-cv EDL Document 1 Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 16

Filing # E-Filed 06/13/ :25:39 PM

Case 3:17-cv SRU Document 1 Filed 08/21/17 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. ADRIAN LOVELL, Civil Action No.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION. ClassAction.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Filing # E-Filed 11/06/ :26:27 AM

Case 3:14-cv MLC-DEA Document 6 Filed 07/15/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 30

Case 0:15-cv WJZ Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2015 Page 1 of 9. Exhibit A

2. One of the defendant in the case is Parker & Gould (P&G). What is exactly P&G?

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

2:18-cv PDB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 03/06/18 Pg 1 of 16 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CASE NO.

Case 5:14-cv CMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

CASE NO. C O M P L A I N T. Attorney, and sues the Defendants, JUSTIN BIEBER ( BIEBER } and HUGO HESNY

Case 0:08-cv JRT-FLN Document 1 Filed 01/04/2008 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

)

Filing # E-Filed 03/29/ :29:03 AM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 2:17-cv JES-CM Document 1 Filed 07/24/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1 UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CASS COUNTY, MISSOURI AT HARRISONVILLE

2:18-cv CSB-EIL # 1 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH CQUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION C 0 M P L A I N T

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

Case: 1:06-cv JRA Doc #: 28 Filed: 05/08/09 1 of 9. PageID #: 220

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 5:02-cv WTH Document 12 Filed 10/23/2002 Page 1 of 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 1 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 7

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL BRANCH -- UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Supreme Court of Florida

Case 5:17-cv Document 2 Filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/03/09 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:2

Case 3:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/30/19 Page 1 of 17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-cv-12698

Case: 5:15-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2

Case 6:17-cv JA-GJK Document 1 Filed 12/14/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

)(

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

2.1T FILED. 3; b ov 16go-J-.9s- CLERK, U. S. DISTRICT COURT

Plaintiff, for its Complaint against the above-captioned Defendants, states and

Filing # E-Filed 12/01/ :28:55 PM

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5

Filing # E-Filed 01/30/ :14:22 AM

COMPLAINT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

10/11/2018 8:39 AM 18CV45669 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) COMPLAINT ) ) ) Case No.:

Page 1 of 8 TO THE DEFENDANT ABOVE-NAMED: SARAH ( SALLY ) WARWICK

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

A. JURISDICTION AND THE PARTIES

Case 8:11-cv PJM Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Courthouse News Service

NATURE OF THE ACTION. This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

Case 4:12-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/04/12 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION V. CAUSE NO.: COMPLAINT (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)

Transcription:

Filing # 28256098 E-Filed 06/09/2015 12:22:25 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION PATRICIA WISE-YOUNGREN, Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO.: HAINES CITY HMA, LLC, d/b/a HEART OF FLORIDA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL The Plaintiff, PATRICIA WISE-YOUNGREN, sues the Defendant, HAINES CITY HMA, LLC, d/b/a HEART OF FLORIDA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, and alleges as follows: 1. This is an action for damages in excess of $1,5,000. 2, This is an action for violations of the Florida Whistleblower Statute, Fla. Stats. 448.101, et seq.. and intentional interference with a business relationship. -3. The Defendant HAINES CITY HMA, LLC, d/b/a HEART OF FLORIDA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER is a Florida corporation authorized to conduct business within the geographical jurisdiction of this Court. 4. The Plaintiff is a resident of Lake County, Florida, and was employed by the Defendant from August 2007 until the termination of her employment in May Count I- Florida Whistleblower Statute 5. The Plaintiff incorporates Paragraphs 1 through 4 as if fully rewritten herein.

6. Beginning in August 2013, the Defendant encouraged and/or permitted licenses practical nurses to administer cardiac arrest medication and narcotics, and to engage in other acts authorized to be completed only by registered nurses. This conduct is contrary to applicable law, rules and/or regulations. 7. The Plaintiff complained of, and refused to participate in, the Defendant s illegal conduct, detailed above, during a staff meeting in April The Plaintiff further informed upper management that the Defendant needed to self-report the conduct to the appropriate governmental authorities. 8. The Plaintiff s request that the conduct be self-reported was ignored. Upper management informed the Plaintiff that it was not an issue. 9. The Plaintiff filed four compliance reports internally with the Defendant between March and May 2014, complaining of and refusing to participate in additional conduct by the Defendant that was contrary to applicable law, rules, and/or regulations. 10. To the Plaintiff s knowledge, none of her complaints, as described above, were investigated by the Defendant. 11. After the Plaintiff complained of and refused to participate in the violations of law, rule, or regulation as detailed above, the Defendant began to retaliate against the Plaintiff with relation to the terms and conditions of her employment. Specifically, but not as a limitation:. The Plaintiff was excluded from important meetings, which had an impact on her ability to perform the functions of her job; 2

b. The Defendant refused to investigate the Plaintiffs complaints of illegal conduct; c. The Defendant terminated the employment of the Plaintiffs assistant, which had an impact on her ability to perform the functions of her job; and d. The Defendant terminated the Plaintiffs employment in or around May 12. The fact that the Plaintiff complained about illegal activity was a motivating factor in the decision by Defendant to terminate the Plaintiffs employment and engage in the other adverse actions described above. Such action by the Defendant violates the Plaintiffs rights under Florida s Whistleblower Act. 13. As a direct and proximate result of the Defendant s illegal retaliatory conduct, as described above, the Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, the loss of income and the value of fringe benefits he would have received had her employment with the Defendant not been terminated. In addition, the Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, emotional distress, mental anguish, humiliation, and the loss of enjoyment of life. 14, WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff prays: a. That the Court take jurisdiction over this action; b. That the Court order the Defendant to reinstate the Plaintiff to her former or to an equivalent position, or in the alternative, award the Plaintiff front pay; c. That the Court award the Plaintiff her lost pay and the value of her lost fringe benefits; 3

cl. That the Court award the Plaintiff compensatory damages; and e, That the Court award the Plaintiff the cost of this action, including a reasonable attorney s fee. ("oiint TT- Tntentinnal TnterCerence with a Business Relationship 15. Plaintiff incorporates paragraphs 1 through 4 as if fully rewritten herein. 16. After the termination of the Plaintiffs employment by the Defendant, detailed above, the Plaintiff secured employment at Shands Hospital in or around.luly 17. Within a few months of starting employment at Shands Hospital, an employee of the Defendant, Debbie Dukes, interviewed for a vacant position at Shands Hospital. Dukes engaged the Plaintiff in a conversation regarding the fact that she was previously employed by the Defendant. 18. In November 2014, Shands Hospital abruptly terminated the Plaintiffs employment based upon purported outside information it had received from a third party. 19. The Defendant was aware of the Plaintiffs business relationship with Shands Hospital and intentionally and unjustifiably interfered with that relationship. 20. As a result of the Defendant s conduct, described above, the Plaintiff'was terminated from her employment at Shands Hospital and has been unable to secure similar employment since that date. The Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income and other employment benefits as well as pain and humiliation because of the Defendant s conduct. 21. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff prays: 4

a. That the Court take jurisdiction over this action; b. That the Court order the Defendant to reinstate the Plaintiff to her former or to an equivalent position, or in the alternative, award the Plaintiff front pay; c. That the Court award the Plaintiff her lost pay and the value of her lost fringe benefits; d. That the Court award the Plaintiff compensatory damages; and e. 1 hat the Court award the Plaintiff the cost of this action, including a reasonable attorney s fee. JURY TRIAL DEMAND The Plaintiff demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable. /s Melissa C. Mihok MELISSA C. MIHOK Florida Bar Number 555851 inoissa@;melissacmihokpa,cpni Secondary email; Ih'ijTThgio.. gmallcpm MELTSS A (T MIHOK, P. A. 1718 E. 7 Ave., Suite 301 Tampa, FL 33605 (813)248-6400 (813) 248-4020 (Fax) 5