Normal Examination Speed (2/2)

Similar documents
PATENT PROSECUTION STRATEGIES IN AN AIA WORLD: SUCCEEDING WITH THE CHANGES

Accelerating the Acquisition of an Enforceable Patent: Bypassing the USPTO s Backlog Lawrence A. Stahl and Seth E. Boeshore

USPTO Programs for Expediting Patent Prosecution: Accelerated Exam, Patent Prosecution Highway, Green Technology. Susan Perng Pan November 2010

Strategies for Expediting U.S. Patent Prosecution. Rachel K. Pilloff

Prioritized Examination and New Prior Art defined for First-Inventor-to-File

STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS IN COORDINATING ACCELERATION OF INTERNATIONAL PATENT PROSECUTION

Annex 2 DEFINITIONS FOR TERMS AND FOR STATISTICS ON PROCEDURES

Moving Patent Applications Through the USPTO: Options for Applicants

Accelerated Examination. Presented by Hans Troesch, Principal Fish & Richardson P.C. March 2, 2010

IP CONCLAVE 2010, MUMBAI STRATEGIES WITH US PATENT PRACTICE NAREN THAPPETA US PATENT ATTORNEY & INDIA PATENT AGENT BANGALORE, INDIA

Patent Prosecution Highway JAPAN PATENT OFFICE

James D. Hallenbeck (Officer, Minneapolis Office)

Changes To Implement the First Inventor To File Provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act Final Rules

USPTO PATENT EXAMINATION ACCELERATION PROGRAMS AND PROPOSALS

Understanding Patent Examiner Docketing & Workflow to Expedite Prosecution

John Doll Commissioner for Patents. February 1, 2006

Navigating the Patent Prosecution Highway and Other Accelerated Filing Options

This document gives a brief summary of the patent application process. The attached chart shows the most common patent protection routes.

FC3 (P5) International Patent Law 2 FINAL Mark Scheme 2017

Foundation Certificate

R 84a EPC does not apply to filing date itself as was no due date missed. So, effective date for and contacts subject matter is

Fast Track. Strategies at the USPTO. Hillsborough County Bar Association. January 5, Anton Hopen. Smith & Hopen, PA

Get Your Design Patent Fast!

Putting the Experience of Chinese Inventors into Context. Richard Miller, Office of Chief Economist May 19, 2015

Updates of JPO Initiatives

Session Patent prosecution practice in Japan Tips for obtaining a patent in Japan - Part I -

PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT): BENEFITS AND STRATEGIES FOR APPLICANTS. Seminar on WIPO Services and Initiatives Gary L. Montle Nashville, TN

This document gives a brief summary of the patent application process. The attached chart shows the most common patent protection routes.

PATENT PROSECUTION HIGHWAY

Procedures to file a request to the JPO (Japan Patent Office) for Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program

Introduction to Patent Prosecution Highway JAPAN PATENT OFFICE

TRANSFER OF PRIORITY RIGHTS PARIS CONVENTION ARTICLE 4A(1)

Prosecuting an Israel Patent Application and Beyond

Policies of USPTO Director Kappos & U.S. Patent Law Reform

FC3 International Patent Law Question Paper Sample Assessment Material

Practice Tips for Foreign Applicants

United States Patent and Trademark Office and Japan Patent Office Collaborative Search. AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.

THE IP5 OFFICES AND THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)

Q233 Grace Period for Patents

GLOSSARY of patent related terms in the IP5 STATISTICS REPORT 2016 EDITION

The role of the European Patent Office as a global partner in patent protection

Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines

Standing Committee on the Law of Patents

Managing costs and timeliness at EPO & UKIPO. Mike Jennings A.A.Thornton & Co October 2017

Chapter 1 DEFINITION OF TERMS. There are various types of IP rights. They can be categorized as:

GLOSSARY of patent related terms in the IP5 STATISTICS REPORT 2015 EDITION

The European Patent Office: serving the global economy. François-Régis Hannart Principal Director European and International Co-operation

Patents: Utility Models Overview of requirements, procedures and tactical use in Europe and Japan

ISSUE BRIEF: U.S. Immigration Priorities in a Global Context

Framework Provisions for the Global Patent Prosecution Highway System

THE IP5 OFFICES AND THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)

GLOSSARY of patent related terms in the FOUR OFFICE STATISTICS REPORT 2010 EDITION

K&L Gates Webinar Current Developments in Patents. Peggy Focarino Commissioner for Patents September 13 th, 2012

PATENT PROSECUTION HIGHWAY (PPH) A PILOT PROGRAM BETWEEN JPO AND VIETNAM S NOIP

PATENT PROSECUTION HIGHWAY (PPH); BIOLOGICS; SOFTWARE AND BUSINESS METHOD PATENTS; SWISS TYPE CLAIMS

QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC3 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 51%

PATENT PROSECUTION HIGHWAY (PPH); BIOLOGICS; SOFTWARE AND BUSINESS METHOD PATENTS; SWISS TYPE CLAIMS HERSHKOVITZ IP GROUP

USPTO Implementation of the America Invents Act. Janet Gongola Patent Reform Coordinator Direct dial:

New Patent Application Rules Set to Take Effect November 1, 2007

Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Programme between the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and the Korean Intellectual Property Office

European patent prosecution

WHAT IS A PATENT AND WHAT DOES IT PROTECT?

Patent Term Patent Term Extension Patent Term Adjustment

Requirements and Procedures to File a Request to CIPO for the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)

Information Disclosure Statements 2017 BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLP

HRST Development in China. Mu Rongping Institute of Policy and Management Chinese Academy of Sciences

Benefits and Dangers of U.S. Provisional Applications

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Latest Trends & Strategies for Applicants

Taiwan s Development Strategy for the Next Phase. Dr. San, Gee Vice Chairman Taiwan External Trade Development Council Taiwan

Outline of the Patent Examination

Patent and License Overview. Kirsten Leute, Senior Associate Office of Technology Licensing, Stanford University

QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC3 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 59% six months after the publication of European search report

Session 1 Patent prosecution practice in Japan Tips for obtaining a patent in Japan

BEST PRACTICES FOR EFFICIENT DOCKETING OF ROUTINE FORMALITIES: PART 1

The life of a patent application at the EPO

Strategies For Protecting Biotechnology In Brazil And China

AMENDMENTS TO THE SINGAPORE PATENTS ACT AND RULES

B+/SG/2/10 ORIGINAL: English DATE: 27/05/2015. B+ Sub-Group OBJECTIVES AND PRINCIPLES, WITH COMMENTARY ON POTENTIAL OUTCOMES. prepared by the Chair

Hastings Science & Technology Law Journal

Delain Law Office, PLLC

Part 1 Current Status of Intellectual Property Rights

IPDAS Forms Library: A Complete List

Networks and Innovation: Accounting for Structural and Institutional Sources of Recombination in Brokerage Triads

Introduction. 1 These materials are public information and have been prepared solely for educational and entertainment purposes to contribute

European Patent Office Annual Report 2015 Country profile: Netherlands. Embargoed until: 3 March 2016

WSPLA (Wash. State Patent Law Assoc.) Lunch Seminar

(SUCCESSFUL) PATENT FILING IN THE US

Intellectual Property Teaching Kit IP Advanced Part I

Patent Prosecution Practice in Japan

4. COMPARISON OF THE INDIAN PATENT LAW WITH THE PATENT LAWS IN U.S., EUROPE AND CHINA

Recent developments at the EPO: Focus on quality and efficiency. Roberta Romano-Götsch EPO Principal Director

AUSTRALIA - Standard Patents - Schedule of Charges

Foreign Patent Law. Why file foreign? Why NOT file foreign? Richard J. Melker

The European patent system

Patent Prosecution Procedures: China & Canada Compared

POTENTIAL PATENT APPLICATION QUESTIONNAIRE

Comments on Proposed Changes to Restriction Practice in Patent Applications

New Approaches to Measuring the Impacts of STI Policy

Newly Signed U.S. Patent Law Will Overhaul Patent Procurement, Enforcement and Defense

USPTO Final Rule Changes for Continuations and Claims. John B. Pegram Ronald C. Lundquist August 30, 2007

Transcription:

Expediting Examination of Patent Applications Through USPTO Programs Peter Trahms Neudorfer KCBA, IP Section February 2, 2012 1 Normal Examination Speed (1/2) First action pendency: 23.6 months Total pendency: 33.6 months Total pendency (including RCEs): 40.6 months Pendency from RCE filing to next action: 4.9 months As of December, 2011 http://www.uspto.gov/dashboards/patents/main.dashxml 2 Normal Examination Speed (2/2) Normal examination speed varies greatly by art unit: As of 2005. 2833 Electrical Connectors 8.8 months 3723 Tools and Metal Working 10.9 months 1752 Radiation Imagery 12.1 months 2123 Simulation and Modeling, Emulation of Computer Components 39.7 months 2617 Interactive Video Distribution 50.4 months 3628 Finance & Banking, Accounting 52.1 months 3 1

USPTO Programs for Expediting Examination Track I Accelerated Examination (AE) Make Special for various reasons Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) 4 Track I: Benefits Final disposition issued within 12 months (all examination is expedited) Final disposition: Notice of allowance Final Office Action Notice of appeal Interference RCE Abandonment 5 Track I: Requirements Pay Fee: $4,800 Claim Limits: 4 independent, 30 total Time for Response: Filing any extension ends participation in the program Filing: Must e file Cap: 10,000 filings/year What: New application, or where an RCE has or is being filed Documents: Request for Track I; documents must be complete on day of request 6 2

Accelerated Examination: Benefits Final disposition issued within 12 months (all examination is expedited) Final disposition: Notice of allowance Final Office Action Notice of appeal Interference RCE Abandonment 7 Accelerated Examination: Requirements Pay Fee: $130 Claim Limits: 3 independent, 20 total, no multiple dependent, single invention Time for Response: One month (or abandoned) Interview: Must agree to have one Filing: Must e file What: New application Documents: support document, IDS Appeal: Dependent claims and their independent claim are decided together 8 Accelerated Examination: Requirements: Eligibility Eligible newly filed application continuation Not Eligible plant applications reissue applications re examination proceedings applications entering the national stage converted from provisional 9 3

Accelerated Examination: Requirements: Documents Pre examination search Accelerated Examination Support Document Support for claims in specification Identify how the prior art teaches the claims MPEP 708.02(a): () (1) An accelerated examination support document must include an information disclosure statement (IDS) in compliance with 37 CFR 1.98 citing each reference deemed most closely related to the subject matter of each of the claims. For each reference cited, the accelerated examination support document must include an identification of all the limitations in the claims that are disclosed by the reference specifying where the limitation is disclosed in the cited reference. Argue why the claims are patentable 10 Accelerated Examination: Requirements: Failure to Comply Dismissed: Substantive error: one chance to cure Pre examination search strategy was insufficient Failure to make required representations Denied: Procedural error: no chance to cure Filed with preliminary amendment Filed with more than 20 claims Paper filed 11 Accelerated Examination: Results: Two Case Studies Filed: 06/30/2010 07/12/2010 Dismissed: 08/25/2010 08/09/2010 Re Filed: 09/27/2010 09/09/2010 Accepted: 10/06/2010 09/17/2010 First OA: 12/20/2010 (NFOA) 12/07/2010 (NFOA) Interview: 02/03/2011 02/08/2011 Second OA: 02/28/2011 (NOA) 03/29/2011 (FOA) Third OA: (N/A) 6/3/2011 (NOA) 12 4

Make Special for Various Reasons: Benefits All examination is expedited No 12 month promise to try like with Track I and AE: Here: Applications whichhave have been made special willbe advanced out of turn for examination and will continue to be treated as special throughout the entire prosecution in the Office. MPEP 708.02 AE: The objective of the accelerated examination program is to complete the examination of an application within twelve months from the filing date of the application. MPEP 708.02(a) 13 Make Special: Requirements Manufacture: Will manufacture in the U.S. if guaranteed patent Infringement: Assert that unquestionably infringed Age: One inventor is 65 years old Health: Poor Subject Matter: enhance environment, develop or conserve energy resources counter terrorism recombinant DNA HIV/AIDS, cancer superconductivity biotechnology for small entities 14 PPH: Benefits Examination within 2 3 months of the grant of the PPH request 15 5

PPH: Requirements (1/2) Depend on country, and expiration of various trial programs Ruling from office of first filing that at least one claim is patentable Claims in U.S. application must sufficiently correspond to allowable claims in other application Prosecution on merits hasn t begun Fee: none 16 PPH: Requirements (2/2) Revised Requirements Claims sufficiently correspond Office of First Filing v. Office of Earlier Filing Amending a new limitation into a claim ends participation 17 PPH: Partners Australia Austria Canada China Denmark Finland Germany Hungary Japan Korea Russia Singapore Spain United Kingdom 18 6

PPH: PPH PCT: What National and regional phase applications under the PCT are eligible Basis: positive results in the PCT international phase 19 PPH: PPH PCT: Who Trilateral Offices: USPTO Japan Patent Office European Patent Office (EPO); Korea Austria Russia Spain 20 Summary Be aware of your art unit s pendency What s the client s goal? Use PPH, or age/health/subject matter if eligible Use Track I if available Generally use AE as last resort 21 7

Benefit Final disp. <12 mos. Summary Track I Accel. Exam. Make Special PPH Final disp. <12 mos. Final disp. <12 mos. Exam within 2 3 months Cost $4,800 Attorney time Eligibility New apps, continuations, New apps, continuations New apps, continuations App w/claim to earlier filed RCE foreign app Claims 4/30 3/20 3/20 Other Perform search, characterize art, 1 month response Standard for applicant/ subject matter/patent Claims sufficiently correspond with allowed foreign claim 22 Peter Trahms Neudorfer ptrahms neudorfer@woodcock.com Woodcock Washburn 999 3 rd Ave, Suite 3600 Seattle, WA 98104 23 Accelerated Examination: Results (1/3) Source: USPTO 24 8

Accelerated Examination: Results (2/3) Source: USPTO 25 9