AMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament

Similar documents
AMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament Draft report Tadeusz Zwiefka (PE v02-00)

OPINION. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2016/0126(NLE) of the Committee on Legal Affairs

Committee on Legal Affairs The Chair

AMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2015/2084(INL) Draft report Emil Radev (PE593.

Plenary sitting ADDENDUM. to the report. Committee on Employment and Social Affairs. Rapporteur: Marita Ulvskog A8-0064/2017

OPINION. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2017/0085(COD) of the Committee on Legal Affairs

Committee on Legal Affairs DRAFT AGENDA. Meeting. Wednesday 20 June 2018, and Thursday 21 June 2018,

*** DRAFT RECOMMENDATION

REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament A8-0047/

15071/15 ADB/mk 1 DG B 3A

REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament A8-0230/

REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament A8-0217/

AMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2018/2271(INL) Draft report Juan Fernando López Aguilar. PE630.

European Pillar of Social Rights

EMES Position Paper on The Social Business Initiative Communication

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 4 May /10 MIGR 43 SOC 311

EN United in diversity EN A8-0036/35. Amendment

Result of roll-call votes of 23 March 2017

Brussels. Wednesday 3 May Thursday 4 May Room: Altiero Spinelli 1G-2. Wednesday 3 May 2017,

UN Commission for Social Development, 4-13 February Statement by Ireland

FOREWORD. 1 A major part of the literature on the non-profit sector since the mid 1970s deals with the conditions under

The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission solemnly proclaim the following text as the European Pillar of Social Rights

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL A CITIZENS AGENDA

Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on European Union programme for social change and innovation (2012/C 225/13)

Towards a European Action Plan for the social economy

REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament A8-0398/

PRIORITIES in the area of employment and social policy during the Bulgarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union 1 January 30 June 2018

Committee on Women s Rights and Gender Equality. on gender equality and empowering women in the digital age (2015/2007(INI))

AMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2014/0094(COD) Draft report Juan Fernando López Aguilar (PE557.

SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT IN THE LIGHT OF THE NEW EU PROCUREMENT DIRECTIVES - WHAT WILL CHANGE IN REGARDS TO THE NEW RULES?

AMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament Draft opinion Eduard Kukan (PE v01-00)

European Approaches of Social Enterprise in a Comparative Perspective:

EPP Policy Paper 2 A Europe for All: Prosperous and Fair

Social Economy as the Mainstream of the European Union Development

Africa-EU Civil Society Forum Declaration Tunis, 12 July 2017

LONDON, UK APRIL 2018

A cooperative manifesto. Cooperative policy priorities for 2014 European Parliament elections

The Future of EU policies for the Social Economy: Towards a European Action Plan

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection

AMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament Draft report Amjad Bashir (PE v01-00)

RESOLUTION. Euronest Parliamentary Assembly Assemblée parlementaire Euronest Parlamentarische Versammlung Euronest Парламентская Aссамблея Евронест

16827/14 YML/ik 1 DG C 1

AMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament. PE v

AMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament Draft report József Nagy (PE v01-00)

AMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament Draft opinion Petr Ježek (PE v01-00)

Social Enterprise and the Third Sector: an International Comparative Perspective

AMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament

AMENDMENTS 1-4. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament Draft opinion Romeo Franz (PE v01-00)

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

13290/11 AP/es 1 DG H 1 B

***I DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2018/0047(COD)

SMART STRATEGIES TO INCREASE PROSPERITY AND LIMIT BRAIN DRAIN IN CENTRAL EUROPE 1


EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION OF CRAFT, SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES

The Baltic Sea Strategy for Fair and Functional Labour Markets Trade Union Standpoints on the Baltic Sea Strategy

POSITION IN THE FORM OF AMENDMENTS

Annex 1 Eligible programme areas Norwegian Financial Mechanism

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs. on the Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union ( ) (2011/2069(INI))

CONCORD Response to the Communication on the proposed Joint Declaration on the EU Development Policy CONCORD Policy Working Group September 2005

EA Political Priorities for

SOCIAL INNOVATION JAN VRANKEN

Promoting Youth Labour Mobility and Tackling Youth Unemployment in Europe

Steering Group Meeting. Conclusions

TEXTS ADOPTED. Social and environmental standards, human rights and corporate responsibility

5th WESTERN BALKANS CIVIL SOCIETY FORUM

PRESIDÊNCIA DO CONSELHO DE MINISTROS Alto Comissariado para a Imigração e Diálogo Intercultural, I.P.

Legal Frameworks for enterprises with social objectives a comparative analysis

At its meeting on 2 May 2018 the Permanent Representatives Committee noted that there was now unanimous agreement on the above conclusions.

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Delegations will find attached the conclusions adopted by the European Council at the above meeting.

EU-EGYPT PARTNERSHIP PRIORITIES

CONTRIBUTION OF THE LI COSAC. Athens, June 2014

Draft conclusions. Regional integration for inclusive growth

AMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2016/2036(INI) Draft report Elmar Brok (PE587.

AMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament Draft report Maurice Ponga (PE v01-00)

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Accompanying the

AMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2016/2298(BUD) Draft report Esteban González Pons (PE594.

AMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament Draft opinion Tania González Peñas (PE v01-00)

Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) Final compromise text reflecting the outcome of the trilogue on 2 December 2013

OPINION. European Parliament 2015/2063(INI) of the Committee on Culture and Education

Amended proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

EU-Chile Joint Parliamentary Committee. Joint Declaration

116th plenary session, 10 and 11 February 2016 OPINION. Age-friendly tourism

AMENDMENTS TO THE TREATY ON EUROPEAN UNION AND TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY

REPORT. EN United in diversity EN A8-0037/ on the EU and the global development framework after 2015 (2014/2143(INI))

Policy Paper on Social Inclusion through Youth Participation

Decent work at the heart of the EU-Africa Strategy

EIGHTY-SIXTH SESSION WORKSHOPS FOR POLICY MAKERS: REPORT CAPACITY-BUILDING IN MIGRATION MANAGEMENT

Thirteenth Triennial Conference of Pacific Women. and. Sixth Meeting of Pacific Ministers for Women. Recommendations and outcomes

Annex 1 Eligible Priority Sectors and Programme Areas Norwegian Financial Mechanism

Committee on Legal Affairs DRAFT AGENDA. Meeting. Monday 14 March 2016, Tuesday 15 March 2016, and

THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL SCOREBOARD: A NEW TOOL FOR MONITORING AND POLICY MAKING? Enrico Giovannini University of Rome Tor Vergata

Committee on Legal Affairs

5. Before I continue, let me briefly introduce the network that I represent here today. The ENCJ gathers the Councils for the Judiciary or similar

AMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN 2011/2081(INI) Draft report Marietje Schaake. PE v01-00

AMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2017/2070(INI) Draft report Tokia Saïfi. PE616.

A reform agenda for Europe's future

European Parliament resolution on Hungary's application for membership of the European Union and the state of negotiations (5 September 2001)

European Parliament resolution of 9 September 2010 on the situation of Roma and on freedom of movement in the European Union

Transcription:

European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Legal Affairs 2016/2237(INL) 17.1.2018 AMDMTS 1-165 Draft report Jiří Maštálka Statute for social and solidarity-based enterprises (2016/2237(INL)) AM\1143377.docx PE616.605v01-00 United in diversity

AM_Com_NonLegReport PE616.605v01-00 2/85 AM\1143377.docx

1 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Jiří Maštálka Citation 1 (new) -1 having regard to its declaration of 10 March 2011 on establishing European statutes for mutual societies, associations and foundations, 2 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Jiří Maštálka Citation 12 a (new) having regard to the July 2011 study commissioned by Parliament's Committee on Employment and Social Affairs entitled 'The role of mutual societies in the 21st century', 3 Evelyn Regner Citation 12 a (new) having regard to the report on workers representation on board level in Europe (2015/2222(INI), Or. en AM\1143377.docx 3/85 PE616.605v01-00

4 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Jiří Maštálka Recital A A. whereas the concept of social enterprise is used in some legal systems interchangeably with that of solidaritybased enterprise ; whereas for the purposes of this resolution the concepts of social enterprise and solidarity-based enterprise are intended to be synonymous; whereas the concept of social enterprise is not clear-cut, and overlaps with that of more traditional social economy organisations, such as cooperatives, mutual organisations, associations and foundations; whereas discussions about the boundaries of the concept of social enterprise are taking place among social scientists and lawyers; whereas it seems imperative to agree at present on a legal definition that makes a solid contribution to the development of social enterprises by the European Union and public administrations at all levels possible; A. whereas the terms 'social enterprises' and 'solidarity-based enterprises' are often confused, but the things which they denote are not invariably the same and can differ greatly from one Member State to another; whereas the concept of 'social enterprise' relates essentially to organisations such as cooperatives, mutual organisations, associations and foundations; whereas the boundaries of the concept of social enterprise are giving rise to numerous discussions among lawyers and social scientists; whereas it seems imperative to move without delay towards better recognition of the concept of 'social and solidarity-based enterprise' by establishing a European label that makes a solid contribution to the efforts by the European Union and public administrations at all levels possible to develop social and solidarity-based enterprises and all enterprises whose intrinsically social purpose could thus be recognised by means of such a label, which could change in the light of trends seen in enterprises in this sector; whereas, therefore, 'social and solidarity-based enterprises' will be the preferred term in this resolution; 1a 1a The terms mentioned in this recital, which do not mean the same things, are often mistranslated into English. In this resolution, the term 'entreprise sociale' should be rendered by 'social enterprise'; 'entreprise de l'économie sociale', by PE616.605v01-00 4/85 AM\1143377.docx

'social economy enterprise'; and 'entreprise basée sur l'économie sociale et la solidarité', by 'social and solidaritybased enterprise'. 5 Daniel Buda Recital A A. whereas the concept of social enterprise is used in some legal systems interchangeably with that of solidaritybased enterprise ; whereas for the purposes of this resolution the concepts of social enterprise and solidarity-based enterprise are intended to be synonymous; whereas the concept of social enterprise is not clear-cut, and overlaps with that of more traditional social economy organisations, such as cooperatives, mutual organisations, associations and foundations; whereas discussions about the boundaries of the concept of social enterprise are taking place among social scientists and lawyers; whereas it seems imperative to agree at present on a legal definition that makes a solid contribution to the development of social enterprises by the European Union and public administrations at all levels possible; A. whereas the concept of social enterprise is used in some legal systems interchangeably with that of solidaritybased enterprise ; whereas for the purposes of this resolution the concepts of social enterprise and solidarity-based enterprise are intended to be synonymous; whereas the concept of social enterprise is not clear-cut at EU level; whereas there is no uniform definition of social enterprise across the Member States and whereas this concept also covers traditional social economy organisations such as cooperatives, mutual organisations, associations and foundations; whereas discussions about the boundaries of the concept of social enterprise are taking place among social scientists and lawyers; whereas there is currently an overriding need to agree on a single harmonised pan-eu legal definition that makes a solid contribution to the development of social enterprises by the European Union and public administrations at all levels possible; Or. ro 6 AM\1143377.docx 5/85 PE616.605v01-00

Gilles Lebreton, Marie-Christine Boutonnet Recital A A. whereas the concept of social enterprise is used in some legal systems interchangeably with that of solidaritybased enterprise ; whereas for the purposes of this resolution the concepts of social enterprise and solidarity-based enterprise are intended to be synonymous; whereas the concept of social enterprise is not clear-cut, and overlaps with that of more traditional social economy organisations, such as cooperatives, mutual organisations, associations and foundations; whereas discussions about the boundaries of the concept of social enterprise are taking place among social scientists and lawyers; whereas it seems imperative to agree at present on a legal definition that makes a solid contribution to the development of social enterprises by the European Union and public administrations at all levels possible; A. whereas the concept of social enterprise is used in some legal systems interchangeably with that of solidaritybased enterprise ; whereas, however, for the purposes of this resolution the concepts of social enterprise and solidarity-based enterprise will not be deemed to be synonymous; whereas, firstly, the concept of social enterprise overlaps with that of more traditional social economy organisations, such as cooperatives, mutual organisations, associations and foundations; whereas, secondly, solidaritybased enterprise is different from social enterprise to the extent that sustainable development and the desire to involve users in policy-making form part of the foundations underpinning its activities; whereas solidarity-based enterprise raises the same kind of issues as social enterprise, but the approaches that it applies to them are not necessarily related to internal democracy or mutualisation; 7 Angel Dzhambazki Recital A A. whereas the concept of social enterprise is used in some legal systems interchangeably with that of solidaritybased enterprise ; whereas for the purposes of this resolution the concepts of social A. whereas the concept of social enterprise is used in some legal systems interchangeably with that of solidaritybased enterprise ; whereas for the purposes of this resolution the concepts of social PE616.605v01-00 6/85 AM\1143377.docx

enterprise and solidarity-based enterprise are intended to be synonymous; whereas the concept of social enterprise is not clear-cut, and overlaps with that of more traditional social economy organisations, such as cooperatives, mutual organisations, associations and foundations; whereas discussions about the boundaries of the concept of social enterprise are taking place among social scientists and lawyers; whereas it seems imperative to agree at present on a legal definition that makes a solid contribution to the development of social enterprises by the European Union and public administrations at all levels possible; enterprise and solidarity-based enterprise are intended to be synonymous; whereas a definition of the concept of social enterprise is not embedded in all Member States' legislative framework, and whereas alternative legal structures are made available and widely used, such as cooperatives, mutual organisations, associations and foundations; whereas discussions about the boundaries of the concept of social enterprise are taking place among social scientists and lawyers; whereas it seems imperative to support Member States' efforts in making a solid contribution to the development of the social enterprise sectors and cooperation with public administrations at all levels; Or. en 8 Virginie Rozière Recital A A. whereas the concept of social enterprise is used in some legal systems interchangeably with that of solidaritybased enterprise ; whereas for the purposes of this resolution the concepts of social enterprise and solidarity-based enterprise are intended to be synonymous; whereas the concept of social enterprise is not clear-cut, and overlaps with that of more traditional social economy organisations, such as cooperatives, mutual organisations, associations and foundations; whereas discussions about the boundaries of the concept of social enterprise are taking place among social scientists and lawyers; whereas it seems imperative to agree at present on a legal definition that makes a solid contribution to the development of A. whereas the concept of social enterprise is used in some legal systems interchangeably with that of solidaritybased enterprise ; whereas for the purposes of this resolution the concepts of social enterprise and solidarity-based enterprise are intended to be synonymous; whereas the concept of social enterprise is not clear-cut, and overlaps with that of more traditional social economy organisations, such as cooperatives, mutual organisations, associations and foundations; whereas discussions about the boundaries of the concept of social enterprise are taking place among social scientists and lawyers; whereas it seems imperative to agree at present on a legal definition that makes a solid contribution to the development of AM\1143377.docx 7/85 PE616.605v01-00

social enterprises by the European Union and public administrations at all levels possible; social enterprises by the European Union and public administrations at all levels possible, including the internal market; 9 Virginie Rozière Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the social economy makes a major contribution to the EU economy; whereas, according to estimates, it comprises between 130 000 and 250 000 enterprises and employs a workforce of 14 million; whereas it is continuing to develop and is thus a driver of growth and employment; 10 Daniel Buda Recital A a (new) 4a. whereas the Strasbourg Declaration of January 2014 highlights the need for social enterprises to play a bigger role in the future of Europe and stresses the importance of unlocking their potential for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Or. ro PE616.605v01-00 8/85 AM\1143377.docx

11 Daniel Buda Recital A b (new) Ab. whereas Parliament highlighted, in its resolutions of 19 February 2009, 20 November 2012 and 10 September 2015, that the social and solidarity-based economy provides employment for more than 14 million people, which represents around 6.5% of workers in the EU and 10% of EU undertakings. Or. ro 12 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Jiří Maštálka Recital B B. whereas there are substantial differences among Member States in the way they regulate social enterprises and the organisational forms available to social entrepreneurs under their legal systems; whereas the distinctive organisational forms that social enterprises adopt depend on the existing legal frameworks, on the political economy of welfare provision and on the cultural and historical traditions of non-profit development in each country; B. whereas there are substantial differences among Member States in the way they regulate social enterprises and the organisational forms available to social entrepreneurs under their legal systems; whereas the distinctive organisational forms that social enterprises adopt depend on the existing legal frameworks, on the political economy of welfare provision and of solidarity and on the cultural and historical traditions in each country; 13 Jean-Marie Cavada, António Marinho e Pinto AM\1143377.docx 9/85 PE616.605v01-00

Recital B B. whereas there are substantial differences among Member States in the way they regulate social enterprises and the organisational forms available to social entrepreneurs under their legal systems; whereas the distinctive organisational forms that social enterprises adopt depend on the existing legal frameworks, on the political economy of welfare provision and on the cultural and historical traditions of non-profit development in each country; B. whereas there are substantial differences among Member States in the way they regulate social enterprises and the organisational forms available to social entrepreneurs under their legal systems; whereas the distinctive organisational forms that social enterprises adopt depend on the existing legal frameworks, on the political economy of welfare provision and on the cultural and historical traditions of for-profit and non-profit development in each country; 14 Emil Radev Recital Б B. whereas there are substantial differences among Member States in the way they regulate social enterprises and the organisational forms available to social entrepreneurs under their legal systems; whereas the distinctive organisational forms that social enterprises adopt depend on the existing legal frameworks, on the political economy of welfare provision and on the cultural and historical traditions of non-profit development in each country; B. whereas there are substantial differences among Member States in the way they regulate social enterprises and the organisational forms available to social entrepreneurs under their legal systems; whereas the distinctive organisational forms that social enterprises adopt depend on the existing legal frameworks, on the political economy of welfare provision and on the cultural and historical traditions of non-profit development in each Member State; Or. bg 15 PE616.605v01-00 10/85 AM\1143377.docx

Angel Dzhambazki Recital B B. whereas there are substantial differences among Member States in the way they regulate social enterprises and the organisational forms available to social entrepreneurs under their legal systems; whereas the distinctive organisational forms that social enterprises adopt depend on the existing legal frameworks, on the political economy of welfare provision and on the cultural and historical traditions of non-profit development in each country; B. whereas there are substantial differences among Member States in the way they regulate social enterprises and the organisational forms available to social entrepreneurs under their legal systems; whereas the distinctive organisational forms that social enterprises adopt depend on the existing legal frameworks, on the political economy, on the cultural and historical traditions of non-profit development in each country, as well as on regional needs; Or. en 16 Virginie Rozière Recital B B. whereas there are substantial differences among Member States in the way they regulate social enterprises and the organisational forms available to social entrepreneurs under their legal systems; whereas the distinctive organisational forms that social enterprises adopt depend on the existing legal frameworks, on the political economy of welfare provision and on the cultural and historical traditions of non-profit development in each country; B. whereas there are substantial differences among Member States in the way they regulate social enterprises and the organisational forms available to social entrepreneurs under their legal systems; whereas the distinctive organisational forms that social enterprises adopt depend on the existing legal frameworks, on the political economy of welfare provision and on the cultural and historical traditions in each country; AM\1143377.docx 11/85 PE616.605v01-00

17 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Virginie Rozière, Jiří Maštálka Recital C C. whereas in some Member States specific legal forms have been created either by adapting the cooperative model or though the introduction of legal forms that recognise the social commitment taken on by a plurality of entities and that include some features specific for social enterprises; whereas in other Member States social enterprises operate using preexisting legal forms, including legal forms used by mainstream SMEs, such as the limited liability company; C. whereas in some Member States specific legal forms have been created either by adapting the cooperative model, among others, or though the introduction of legal forms that recognise the social commitment taken on by a plurality of entities and that include some features specific for social and solidarity-based enterprises; whereas in other Member States those enterprises operate using preexisting legal forms, including legal forms used by conventional companies, such as the limited liability company or the public limited company, and whereas in some Member States the legal arrangements may even be optional; whereas it should be noted that even if specific legal forms have been devised for them, social enterprises, in many cases, opt for a variety of other legal forms better suited to their needs and their situation; 18 Daniel Buda Recital C C. whereas in some Member States specific legal forms have been created either by adapting the cooperative model or though the introduction of legal forms that recognise the social commitment taken on by a plurality of entities and that include C. whereas in some Member States such as Italy and Germany, specific legal forms have been created either by adapting the cooperative model or though the introduction of legal forms that recognise the social commitment taken on by a PE616.605v01-00 12/85 AM\1143377.docx

some features specific for social enterprises; whereas in other Member States social enterprises operate using preexisting legal forms, including legal forms used by mainstream SMEs, such as the limited liability company; plurality of entities and that include some features specific for social enterprises; whereas in other Member States social enterprises operate using pre-existing legal forms (e.g. associations, foundations and cooperatives), including legal forms used by mainstream SMEs, such as the limited liability company; Or. ro 19 Pascal Durand Recital C C. whereas in some Member States specific legal forms have been created either by adapting the cooperative model or though the introduction of legal forms that recognise the social commitment taken on by a plurality of entities and that include some features specific for social enterprises; whereas in other Member States social enterprises operate using preexisting legal forms, including legal forms used by mainstream SMEs, such as the limited liability company; C. whereas in some Member States specific legal forms have been created either by adapting the cooperative, mutual, association, or foundation model or though the introduction of legal forms that recognise the social commitment taken on by a plurality of entities and that include some features specific for social enterprises; whereas in other Member States social enterprises operate using preexisting legal forms, including legal forms used by mainstream SMEs, such as the limited liability company; 20 Virginie Rozière Recital C AM\1143377.docx 13/85 PE616.605v01-00

C. whereas in some Member States specific legal forms have been created either by adapting the cooperative model or though the introduction of legal forms that recognise the social commitment taken on by a plurality of entities and that include some features specific for social enterprises; whereas in other Member States social enterprises operate using preexisting legal forms, including legal forms used by mainstream SMEs, such as the limited liability company; C. whereas in some Member States specific legal forms have been created either by adapting the cooperative, mutual, association, or foundation model or though the introduction of legal forms that recognise the social commitment taken on by a plurality of entities and that include some features specific for social enterprises; whereas in other Member States social enterprises operate using preexisting legal forms, including legal forms used by mainstream SMEs, such as the limited liability company; 21 Angel Dzhambazki Recital C C. whereas in some Member States specific legal forms have been created either by adapting the cooperative model or though the introduction of legal forms that recognise the social commitment taken on by a plurality of entities and that include some features specific for social enterprises; whereas in other Member States social enterprises operate using preexisting legal forms, including legal forms used by mainstream SMEs, such as the limited liability company; C. whereas in some Member States specific legal forms have been created either by adapting the cooperative model or though the introduction of legal forms that recognise the social commitment taken on by a plurality of entities and that include some features specific for social enterprises; whereas in other Member States social enterprises successfully operate using pre-existing legal forms; Or. en 22 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kateřina Konečná Recital C PE616.605v01-00 14/85 AM\1143377.docx

C. whereas in some Member States specific legal forms have been created either by adapting the cooperative model or though the introduction of legal forms that recognise the social commitment taken on by a plurality of entities and that include some features specific for social enterprises; whereas in other Member States social enterprises operate using preexisting legal forms, including legal forms used by mainstream SMEs, such as the limited liability company; C. whereas in some Member States specific legal forms have been created either by adapting the cooperative, mutual, association or foundation model or though the introduction of legal forms that recognise the social commitment taken on by a plurality of entities and that include some features specific for social enterprises; whereas in other Member States social enterprises operate using preexisting legal forms, including legal forms used by mainstream SMEs, such as the limited liability company; Or. en 23 Daniel Buda Recital D D. whereas the adoption of diverse legal frameworks on social enterprises in many Member States confirm the development of a new kind of entrepreneurship more focused on social value creation; whereas this diversity also confirms that social entrepreneurship is an innovative field; D. whereas the adoption of diverse legal frameworks on social enterprises in many Member States confirm the development of a new kind of entrepreneurship more focused on principles such as solidarity, accountability and social value creation, working in the general interest and promoting a more sustainable economy by creating jobs and providing innovative products and services; whereas this diversity also confirms that social entrepreneurship is an innovative field; Or. ro 24 AM\1143377.docx 15/85 PE616.605v01-00

Marie-Christine Vergiat, Jiří Maštálka Recital D D. whereas the adoption of diverse legal frameworks on social enterprises in many Member States confirm the development of a new kind of entrepreneurship more focused on social value creation; whereas this diversity also confirms that social entrepreneurship is an innovative field; D. whereas the adoption of diverse legal frameworks on social enterprises in many Member States confirm the development of a new kind of entrepreneurship more focused on social added value creation; whereas this diversity also confirms that social entrepreneurship is an innovative field; whereas social enterprises are proving particularly resilient to the economic and financial crisis and have capacities for both social and technological innovation; 25 Angel Dzhambazki Recital D D. whereas the adoption of diverse legal frameworks on social enterprises in many Member States confirm the development of a new kind of entrepreneurship more focused on social value creation; whereas this diversity also confirms that social entrepreneurship is an innovative field; D. whereas the adoption of diverse legal frameworks on social enterprises in many Member States confirm the development of a new kind of entrepreneurship more focused on social value creation; Or. en 26 Virginie Rozière PE616.605v01-00 16/85 AM\1143377.docx

Recital D D. whereas the adoption of diverse legal frameworks on social enterprises in many Member States confirm the development of a new kind of entrepreneurship more focused on social value creation; whereas this diversity also confirms that social entrepreneurship is an innovative field; D. whereas the adoption of diverse legal frameworks on social enterprises in many Member States confirm the development of a new kind of entrepreneurship more focused on social value creation and local connections; whereas this diversity also confirms that social entrepreneurship is an innovative field; 27 Jean-Marie Cavada, António Marinho e Pinto Recital D D. whereas the adoption of diverse legal frameworks on social enterprises in many Member States confirm the development of a new kind of entrepreneurship more focused on social value creation; whereas this diversity also confirms that social entrepreneurship is an innovative field; D. whereas the adoption of diverse legal frameworks on social enterprises in many Member States confirm the development of a new kind of entrepreneurship more focused on social value creation; whereas this diversity also confirms that social entrepreneurship is an innovative and beneficial field; 28 Daniel Buda Recital D a (new) AM\1143377.docx 17/85 PE616.605v01-00

Da. whereas Parliament emphasised, in its resolution of 10 September 2015 on social entrepreneurship and social innovation in combating unemployment, that social innovation relates to the development and implementation of new ideas, whether they be products, services or social organisation models, that are designed to meet new social, territorial and environmental demands and challenges, such as the ageing population, depopulation, balancing work and family life, managing diversity, tackling youth unemployment, the integration of those most excluded from the labour market, and combating climate change; Or. ro 29 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Jiří Maštálka, Virginie Rozière Recital E E. whereas, in light of this diversity of legal forms available for the creation of a social enterprise across Member States, there does not seem to exist a consensus in Europe as to whether it is convenient or necessary at the present moment to set up at EU level a specific form of social enterprise; whereas Parliament has already stressed that the development of any new legal frameworks at Union level should be optional for enterprises and preceded by an impact assessment to take into account the existence of various social business models across the Member States; whereas Parliament has also stressed that any measures should demonstrate Union-wide added value; E. whereas, in light of this diversity of legal forms available for the creation of a statute for a social and solidarity-based enterprise across Member States, there does not seem to exist a consensus in Europe on setting up a specific form of social enterprise at EU level at this point in time; whereas Parliament has already stressed the importance of developing new legal frameworks at Union level, but has always made the point that these can only be optional in relation to national frameworks; whereas it takes the view that the impact studies already carried out, for instance on mutual societies, serve to demonstrate that statutes of this type could be introduced on a Europewide basis if they took into account the existence of various social business models PE616.605v01-00 18/85 AM\1143377.docx

across the Member States; whereas Parliament has also stressed that any measures should demonstrate Union-wide added value; 30 Jean-Marie Cavada, António Marinho e Pinto Recital E E. whereas, in light of this diversity of legal forms available for the creation of a social enterprise across Member States, there does not seem to exist a consensus in Europe as to whether it is convenient or necessary at the present moment to set up at EU level a specific form of social enterprise; whereas Parliament has already stressed that the development of any new legal frameworks at Union level should be optional for enterprises and preceded by an impact assessment to take into account the existence of various social business models across the Member States; whereas Parliament has also stressed that any measures should demonstrate Union-wide added value; E. whereas, in light of this diversity of legal forms available for the creation of a social enterprise within the EU, there does not seem to exist a single view among the Member States as to whether it is necessary at the present moment to set up at EU level a specific form of social enterprise; whereas Parliament has already stressed that the development of any new legal frameworks at Union level should be optional for enterprises and preceded by an impact assessment to take into account the existence of various social business models across the Member States; whereas Parliament has also stressed that any measures should demonstrate Union-wide added value; 31 Evelyn Regner Recital E a (new) AM\1143377.docx 19/85 PE616.605v01-00

Ea. whereas social dialogue is crucially important both in terms of realising the objective of the social market economy, which is full employment with social progress, and in terms of competitiveness and fairness in the EU single market; whereas social dialogue and consultation with the social partners in EU policy-making represent a major social innovation; Or. de 32 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Jiří Maštálka Recital F F. whereas the fact that there is a choice in the available legal forms has the advantage of permitting social enterprises to shape their structure in the manner which suits them best in the circumstances in question, the tradition where they have their roots and the type of business they wish to conduct; F. whereas the fact that there is a choice in the available legal forms has the advantage of permitting social and solidarity-based enterprises to shape their structure in the manner which suits them best in the circumstances in question, the tradition where they have their roots and the type of business they wish to conduct; 33 Angel Dzhambazki Recital F F. whereas the fact that there is a choice in the available legal forms has the advantage of permitting social enterprises to shape their structure in the manner F. whereas the fact that there is a choice in the available legal forms has the advantage of permitting social enterprises to shape their structure in the manner PE616.605v01-00 20/85 AM\1143377.docx

which suits them best in the circumstances in question, the tradition where they have their roots and the type of business they wish to conduct; which suits them best in the regional circumstances in question, the tradition where they have their roots and the type of business they wish to conduct; Or. en 34 Angel Dzhambazki Recital G G. whereas notwithstanding the above it is possible to derive from national experiences at Member State level some distinctive features and criteria that a social enterprise should fulfil, regardless of the legal form it adopts, if it is to be considered as such type of enterprise; whereas it seems desirable to establish at Union level those features and criteria in the form of minimum standards with a view to creating a consistent legal framework for such enterprises and to ensure that all social enterprises have a common identity regardless of the Member State of incorporation; whereas such institutional features should help to maintain social enterprise advantage over alternative ways of organising the production of social services; G. whereas notwithstanding the above it is possible to derive from national experiences at Member State level some distinctive features and criteria that a social enterprise should fulfil, regardless of the legal form it adopts, if it is to be considered as such type of enterprise; whereas it seems desirable to establish a common set of criteria providing an ideological framework in support of the work of social enterprises throughout the Union; whereas such features should help to maintain social enterprise advantage over alternative ways of organising the production of social services; Or. en 35 Daniel Buda Recital G AM\1143377.docx 21/85 PE616.605v01-00

G. whereas notwithstanding the above it is possible to derive from national experiences at Member State level some distinctive features and criteria that a social enterprise should fulfil, regardless of the legal form it adopts, if it is to be considered as such type of enterprise; whereas it seems desirable to establish at Union level those features and criteria in the form of minimum standards with a view to creating a consistent legal framework for such enterprises and to ensure that all social enterprises have a common identity regardless of the Member State of incorporation; whereas such institutional features should help to maintain social enterprise advantage over alternative ways of organising the production of social services; G. whereas notwithstanding the above it is possible to derive from national experiences at Member State level some distinctive features and criteria that a social enterprise should fulfil, regardless of the legal form it adopts, if it is to be considered as such type of enterprise; whereas it seems desirable to establish at Union level those features and criteria in the form of minimum standards with a view to creating an efficient, consistent and harmonised legal framework for such enterprises and to ensure, while recognising their diversity, that all social enterprises have a common identity regardless of the Member State of incorporation; whereas such institutional features should help to maintain social enterprise advantage over alternative ways of organising the production of social services; Or. ro 36 Jiří Maštálka, Kostas Chrysogonos, Kateřina Konečná Recital G G. whereas notwithstanding the above it is possible to derive from national experiences at Member State level some distinctive features and criteria that a social enterprise should fulfil, regardless of the legal form it adopts, if it is to be considered as such type of enterprise; whereas it seems desirable to establish at Union level those features and criteria in the form of minimum standards with a view to creating a consistent legal framework for such enterprises and to ensure that all social enterprises have a common identity G. whereas notwithstanding the above it is possible to derive from national experiences at Member State level some distinctive features and criteria that a social enterprise should fulfil, regardless of the legal form it adopts, if it is to be considered as such type of enterprise; whereas it seems desirable to establish at Union level those features and criteria in the form of minimum standards with a view to creating a consistent legal framework for such enterprises and to ensure that all social enterprises have a common identity PE616.605v01-00 22/85 AM\1143377.docx

regardless of the Member State of incorporation; whereas such institutional features should help to maintain social enterprise advantage over alternative ways of organising the production of social services; regardless of the Member State of incorporation; whereas such institutional features should help to maintain social enterprise advantage over alternative ways of organising the production of services, including social services; Or. en 37 Virginie Rozière Recital G G. whereas notwithstanding the above it is possible to derive from national experiences at Member State level some distinctive features and criteria that a social enterprise should fulfil, regardless of the legal form it adopts, if it is to be considered as such type of enterprise; whereas it seems desirable to establish at Union level those features and criteria in the form of minimum standards with a view to creating a consistent legal framework for such enterprises and to ensure that all social enterprises have a common identity regardless of the Member State of incorporation; whereas such institutional features should help to maintain social enterprise advantage over alternative ways of organising the production of social services; G. whereas notwithstanding the above it is possible to derive from national experiences at Member State level some distinctive features and criteria that a social enterprise should fulfil, regardless of the legal form it adopts, if it is to be considered as such a type of enterprise; whereas it seems desirable to establish at Union level those features and criteria in the form of minimum standards with a view to creating a consistent legal framework for such enterprises and to ensure that all social enterprises have a common identity regardless of the Member State of incorporation; whereas such institutional features should help to maintain social enterprise advantage over alternative ways of organising the production of services, including social services; 38 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Jiří Maštálka Recital G AM\1143377.docx 23/85 PE616.605v01-00

G. whereas notwithstanding the above it is possible to derive from national experiences at Member State level some distinctive features and criteria that a social enterprise should fulfil, regardless of the legal form it adopts, if it is to be considered as such type of enterprise; whereas it seems desirable to establish at Union level those features and criteria in the form of minimum standards with a view to creating a consistent legal framework for such enterprises and to ensure that all social enterprises have a common identity regardless of the Member State of incorporation; whereas such institutional features should help to maintain social enterprise advantage over alternative ways of organising the production of social services; G. whereas notwithstanding the above it is possible to derive from national experiences at Member State level some distinctive features and criteria that a social and solidarity-based enterprise should fulfil, regardless of the legal form it adopts, if it is to be considered as such a type of enterprise; whereas it seems desirable to establish at Union level those features and criteria in the form of minimum standards with a view to creating a consistent legal framework for such enterprises and to ensure that all social enterprises have a common identity regardless of the Member State of incorporation; whereas such institutional features should help to give them an advantage over alternative ways of organising the production of social services; 39 Gilles Lebreton, Marie-Christine Boutonnet Recital J introductory part J. whereas in its resolution of 10 September 2015, Parliament noted that social and solidarity-based economy enterprises, which do not necessarily have to be non-profit organisations, are enterprises whose purpose is to achieve their social goal, which may be to create jobs for vulnerable groups, provide services for their members, or more generally create a positive social and environmental impact, and which reinvest their profits primarily in order to achieve those objectives; points out that social and J. whereas in its resolution of 10 September 2015, Parliament amalgamated the two concepts of social economy and solidarity-based economy into one, which from the legal point of view can cause confusion; whereas it should certainly be pointed out that neither social economy enterprises nor solidarity-based economy enterprises necessarily have to be nonprofit organisations; whereas only those enterprises operating as cooperatives, mutual societies, or associations, and whose purpose is to achieve their social PE616.605v01-00 24/85 AM\1143377.docx

solidarity-based economy enterprises are characterised by their commitment to upholding the following values: goal, which may be to create jobs for vulnerable groups or to provide services for their members, creating a positive social impact by reinvesting their profits primarily in order to achieve those objectives, are social economy enterprises, which does not imply that they seek to create a positive environmental impact; 40 Virginie Rozière Recital J introductory part J. whereas in its resolution of 10 September 2015, Parliament noted that social and solidarity-based economy enterprises, which do not necessarily have to be non-profit organisations, are enterprises whose purpose is to achieve their social goal, which may be to create jobs for vulnerable groups, provide services for their members, or more generally create a positive social and environmental impact, and which reinvest their profits primarily in order to achieve those objectives; points out that social and solidarity-based economy enterprises are characterised by their commitment to upholding the following values: J. whereas in its resolution of 10 September 2015, Parliament noted that social and solidarity-based economy enterprises, which do not necessarily have to be non-profit organisations, are enterprises whose purpose is to achieve their social goal, which may be to create jobs for vulnerable groups, provide services to their members, or more generally create a positive social and environmental impact, and which reinvest their profits primarily in order to achieve those objectives; whereas it pointed out that social and solidarity-based economy enterprises are characterised by their commitment to upholding the following values: 41 Gilles Lebreton, Marie-Christine Boutonnet Recital J indent 1 AM\1143377.docx 25/85 PE616.605v01-00

the primacy of individual and social goals over the interests of capital; deleted 42 Gilles Lebreton, Marie-Christine Boutonnet Recital J indent 2 democratic governance by members; deleted 43 Gilles Lebreton, Marie-Christine Boutonnet Recital J indent 3 the conjunction of the interests of members and users with the general interest; deleted 44 Virginie Rozière Recital J indent 3 PE616.605v01-00 26/85 AM\1143377.docx

the conjunction of the interests of members and users with the general interest; (Does not affect the English version.) 45 Gilles Lebreton, Marie-Christine Boutonnet Recital J indent 4 the safeguarding and application of the principles of solidarity and responsibility; deleted 46 Gilles Lebreton, Marie-Christine Boutonnet Recital J indent 5 the reinvestment of surplus funds in long-term development objectives, or in the provision of services of interest to members or of services of general interest; deleted 47 Gilles Lebreton, Marie-Christine Boutonnet Recital J indent 6 AM\1143377.docx 27/85 PE616.605v01-00

voluntary and open membership; deleted 48 Gilles Lebreton, Marie-Christine Boutonnet Recital J indent 7 autonomous management independent of the public authorities; deleted 49 Gilles Lebreton, Marie-Christine Boutonnet Recital K K. whereas the above definitions are compatible and seem to bring together the features shared by all social enterprises regardless of the Member State of incorporation; whereas such features should constitute the baseline for a crosscutting and more definitive legal definition of social enterprise at Union level; deleted 50 Daniel Buda PE616.605v01-00 28/85 AM\1143377.docx

Recital K K. whereas the above definitions are compatible and seem to bring together the features shared by all social enterprises regardless of the Member State of incorporation; whereas such features should constitute the baseline for a crosscutting and more definitive legal definition of social enterprise at Union level; K. whereas the above definitions are compatible and bring together all the features shared by all social enterprises regardless of the Member State of incorporation and irrespective of the legal form they have chosen to adopt pursuant to national legislation and Community law; whereas such features should constitute the baseline for a harmonised legal definition of social enterprise that is universally agreed, applied and used throughout the Union; Or. ro 51 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Jiří Maštálka, Virginie Rozière Recital K K. whereas the above definitions are compatible and seem to bring together the features shared by all social enterprises regardless of the Member State of incorporation; whereas such features should constitute the baseline for a crosscutting and more definitive legal definition of social enterprise at Union level; K. whereas the above definitions are compatible and seem to bring together the features shared by all social and solidaritybased enterprises regardless of the Member State of incorporation; whereas such features should constitute the baseline for a European label for the 'social and solidarity-based enterprise'; 52 Angel Dzhambazki AM\1143377.docx 29/85 PE616.605v01-00

Recital K K. whereas the above definitions are compatible and seem to bring together the features shared by all social enterprises regardless of the Member State of incorporation; whereas such features should constitute the baseline for a crosscutting and more definitive legal definition of social enterprise at Union level; K. whereas the above definitions are compatible and seem to bring together the features shared by most not-for-profit social enterprises regardless of the Member State of incorporation; whereas such features could constitute the baseline for a common understanding of social enterprise at Union level; Or. en 53 Gilles Lebreton, Marie-Christine Boutonnet Recital L L. whereas social enterprises are private organisations independent from public authorities; L. whereas these two types of enterprises are private organisations independent from public authorities; 54 Angel Dzhambazki Recital M M. whereas social enterprises operate in the market in an entrepreneurial fashion; whereas this implies that social enterprises carry on activities of a commercial nature and assume economic risks; whereas the financial viability of a social enterprise ultimately depends on M. whereas social enterprises operate in the market in an entrepreneurial fashion; PE616.605v01-00 30/85 AM\1143377.docx

the efforts made by their members and workers to secure adequate resources; Or. en 55 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Jiří Maštálka Recital M M. whereas social enterprises operate in the market in an entrepreneurial fashion; whereas this implies that social enterprises carry on activities of a commercial nature and assume economic risks; whereas the financial viability of a social enterprise ultimately depends on the efforts made by their members and workers to secure adequate resources; M. whereas social enterprises operate in the market in an entrepreneurial fashion; whereas this implies that social enterprises carry on activities of an economic nature; 56 Angel Dzhambazki Recital N N. whereas the contribution to social value creation must be the main purpose of a social enterprise; whereas social enterprises should expressly pursue the aim of benefitting the community at large or a specific group of people, transcending membership; whereas the social purpose pursued by social enterprises should be clearly indicated in their documents of establishment; whereas the notion of social enterprise should not be confused with that N. whereas the contribution to social value creation must be the main purpose of a social enterprise; whereas social enterprises should expressly pursue the aim of benefitting the community at large or a specific group of people, transcending membership; whereas the social purpose pursued by social enterprises should be clearly indicated in their documents of establishment; whereas the notion of social enterprise should not be confused with that AM\1143377.docx 31/85 PE616.605v01-00

of corporate social responsibility (CSR), even though commercial enterprises with significant CSR activities can have a strong interconnection with social business; of corporate social responsibility (CSR), even though commercial enterprises with significant CSR activities can have a strong interconnection with social business; whereas social enterprises are not to have as their aim traditional commercial profit creation but, instead, use any added value created for the further development of projects aimed at improving the environment for their target groups; Or. en 57 Gilles Lebreton, Marie-Christine Boutonnet Recital N N. whereas the contribution to social value creation must be the main purpose of a social enterprise; whereas social enterprises should expressly pursue the aim of benefitting the community at large or a specific group of people, transcending membership; whereas the social purpose pursued by social enterprises should be clearly indicated in their documents of establishment; whereas the notion of social enterprise should not be confused with that of corporate social responsibility (CSR), even though commercial enterprises with significant CSR activities can have a strong interconnection with social business; N. whereas the contribution to social value creation must be the main purpose of a social enterprise; whereas social enterprises should expressly pursue the aim of benefiting the community at large or a specific group of people, transcending membership; whereas the social purpose pursued by social enterprises should be clearly indicated in their documents of establishment; whereas the notion of social enterprise should not be confused with that of corporate social responsibility (CSR), even though commercial enterprises with significant CSR activities can have a strong interconnection with social business, nor should it be confused with the notion of solidarity-based enterprise; 58 Marie-Christine Vergiat, Jiří Maštálka PE616.605v01-00 32/85 AM\1143377.docx