Form 23 PRE-HEARING CONFERENCE REPORT FOR CROWN APPLICATIONS

Similar documents
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (ONTARIO) PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE REPORT

PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE REPORT (Criminal Code, s )

Index. Current to Release accused subject to a hospital detention

York Regional Police. Rules for Discipline Hearings under Part V the Police Services Act

CRIMINAL LAW PROFESSIONAL STANDARD #2

PROVINCIAL COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: R. v. Longaphy, 2017 NSPC 67. v. Christopher Longaphy. Section 11(B) Charter - Decision - Unreasonable Delay

Table of Contents. CON-1 (Mental Disorder) (2013-3)

Court of Appeal of Alberta Criminal Appeal Rules Approved by the Court of Appeal April 16, 2018, Canada Gazette (2018) SI/ , 152 C Gaz II, 1050

PRACTICE CHECKLISTS MANUAL

PRACTICE DIRECTIVES FOR CONTESTED APPLICATIONS IN THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF MANITOBA

PORTAGE la PRAIRIE RESOLUTION DOCKET PROTOCOL ADULT CHARGES

CRIMINAL RULES OF THE ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE RULE 1 GENERAL. (2) Dealing with proceedings justly and efficiently includes

RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THECOLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO INDEX

Roster Lawyers Tariff of Fees

Date (yyyy-mm-dd) PART 2 TRIAL SCHEDULING ENDORSEMENT FORM

Vulnerable Victims and Witnesses Adult VUL 1 CHA 1 DIR 1. March 1, Principle

ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE

Criminal Procedure Act 2009

SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR. PRACTICE DIRECTIVE P.D. (Crim.) No

OUTLINE OF CRIMINAL COURT PROCESS

CHILDREN COURT RULES, 2018

Rule 8400 Rules of Practice and Procedure GENERAL Introduction Definitions General Principles

Criminal Pre-Trial Conference Pilot Project Evaluation Report

Evidence Presented by: Ervin Gonzalez, Esq.

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

After the initial charges are laid against the accused the trial should take place: After Preliminary inquiry: within six months to one year

Judicial Protocol on the implementation of section 28 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999: Pre-recording of crossexamination

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step

Criminal Law Table of Contents

Vermont Bar Association Seminar Materials. 62nd Mid-Year Meeting. Criminal Law 101

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRE-TRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

Legal Supplement Part B Vol. 55, No st April, RULES THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES, 2016

Who s who in a Criminal Trial

ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION. via telephone (check one) /

"SOME THOUGHTS ON GUILTY PLEAS AND SENTENCING"

PRE-TRIAL COORDINATION PROTOCOL ADULT CHARGES

P R E T R I A L O R D E R

Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step

To provide a continuum of innovative and cost effective legal services for people in need throughout Alberta.

RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE OF THE ONTARIO COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORKERS AND SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS INDEX

RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF REGISTERED PSYCHOTHERAPISTS AND REGISTERED MENTAL HEALTH THERAPISTS OF ONTARIO INDEX

ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION

The learner can: 1.1 Explain the requirements of a lawful arrest.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. Senate Bill 505

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO

The learner can: 1.1 Explain the requirements of a lawful arrest.

Revision history (November 2007)

Yukon Corrections: Adult Custody Policy Manual. B 4.1 Inmate Disciplinary Process Approved by: Revised: February 9, 2018

EMPLOYMENT COURT PRACTICE DIRECTIONS October 2016

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON C ATLANTA JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF GEORGIA * * * JUDGE SHAWN ELLEN LaGRUA

Services For Victims of Crime

The learner can: 1.1 Explain the requirements of a lawful arrest.

BIG CASE MANAGEMENT HEARINGS OPINION GUIDELINE

Fall, Criminal Litigation 9/4/17. Criminal Litigation: Arraignment to Appeal. How Do We Get A Case?

F 3.201(2)(A) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS ) JOHN D. DOE, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) THOMAS M. SMITH, ) ) Defendant.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LUZERNE COUNTY

Getting it Right First Time Case Ownership Duty of Direct Engagement Consistent judicial case management

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...17 FORWARD...23

THE QUEEN. D M Wilson QC for Crown C M Clews for Prisoner SENTENCE OF RANDERSON J

Sentencing Act Examinable excerpts of PART 1 PRELIMINARY. 1 Purposes

THE HONORABLE MEL DICKSTEIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT PRACTICE POINTERS & PREFERENCES

1. In these rules Tribunal means any of the chair, acting chair, panel of members, or a panel of one member, as the case may be.

Proposal for a draft United Nations Statute on an International Criminal Court or Tribunal for Cyberspace (Second Edition May 2013) Introduction

The Criminal Justice System: From Charges to Sentencing

RULE 82 CRIMINAL APPEAL RULE INTERPRETATION AND DEFINITIONS

Table of Contents. Dedication... iii Preface... v Table of Cases... xv. A. General Principles... 1

BY-LAW NO. 44 ONTARIO COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORKERS AND SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS - RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE

COURT RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 12 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Have you ever been a victim or a witness to a crime? If so, you may be entitled to certain rights under Louisiana's Crime Victim Bill of Rights.

ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE

ONTARIO SECURITIES COMMISSION PRACTICE GUIDELINE

The Summary Offences Procedure Act, 1990

DEFENDING DRINKING AND DRIVING CASES

Policy of the Provincial Court of British Columbia

Law of the Child (Juvenile Court Procedure)

Discipline Committee Rules

The Summary Offences Procedure Act, 1990

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge. Courtroom Deputy Clerk

EL PASO CRIMINAL DISTRICT AND COUNTY COURT SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR THE COMPENSATION OF COURT APPOINTED COUNSEL SEPTEMBER 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS. iii

Part 44 Alberta Divorce Rules

SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA PRACTICE DIRECTION (CRIMINAL)

The Summary Offences Procedure Act, 1990

September 1, 2015 Le 1 er septembre 2015 DISCLOSURE

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE DEBORAH A. BATTS

Section 1: Statement of Purpose Section 2: Voluntary Discovery Section 3: Discovery by Order of the Court... 2

5. There shall be a sitting of Parliament and of each legislature at least once every twelve months. (82)

Regulations of the Court

RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE & FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE

PART 6: RESOLVING ISSUES AND PRESERVING RIGHTS

Filed & Entered: 03/14/2016

CASE NUMBER: UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

Number 28 of Criminal Justice (Victims of Crime) Act 2017

CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS [FEDERAL]

OBJECTS AND REASONS. Arrangement of Sections PART I PRELIMINARY PART II FORENSIC PROCEDURES BY CONSENT

Schedule B. Constitution Act, 1982 (79) Enacted as Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.) 1982, c. 11, which came into force on April 17, 1982

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SAC COUNTY

Transcription:

Form 23 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE Region Court File No. (if known) NOTE: 1. This form must be completed in full in all cases, and signed by the assigned counsel, or a counsel authorized to bind the, and by counsel of record for each offender, before the first judicial pre-hearing conference, unless otherwise ordered, or unless the offender will definitely be consenting to the application. 2. and defence counsel are encouraged to discuss the issues to be addressed at the pre-hearing conference in advance of the conference. 3. Counsel must provide their position on each issue, and not indicate they will advise, or not as yet, etc. 4. must complete this form and fax, or deliver it to defence counsel of record and the Superior Court Trial Office, not later than 10 days before the date scheduled for the pre-hearing conference. counsel must fax or deliver their report to the Attorney and the Superior Court Trial Office not later than 5 days before the date scheduled for the pre-hearing conference, regardless of whether the has filed a form. In cases where the has not filed the form, or has filed it late, defence counsel should complete the form to the extent possible. 5. If any party changes the position taken on this form, which will be provided to the application judge, they must provide written notice to the other party and the Superior Court Trial Office of the change in position, in addition to any notice required by the Rules of Court. If counsel have not indicated an application will be brought, the presumption is that it will not be heard. The failure to notify the other side and the Trial Office of any application not indicated on this form, will be a factor considered by the trial judge in determining whether the new position has prejudiced the other party, and whether any application may proceed. BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN - and - Report, prepared by: Report, prepared by: Have counsel discussed the issues raised in this form? Yes No ASSESSMENT PHASE 1. Chronology a) Date(s) of Offence(s): b) Date of Arrest: c) Date of Conviction: 2. Form of Judicial Interim Release a) Is the offender detained in custody on this/these charges? Yes No b) Is the offender detained in custody on any other charges? Yes No 3. Offences upon which the offender has been convicted or will be pleading guilty to:

4. Trial Judge: Page 2 Do counsel anticipate any problem arising if the Court were to assign a judge other than the trial judge to hear the Dangerous or Long-Term Offender Application? : Yes No : Yes No If yes, please specify: 5. Upon which section(s) does the rely in seeking a Part XXIV order? s. 753(1)(a)(i) s. 753(1)(a)(ii) s. 753(1)(a)(iii) s. 753(1)(b) s. 753.1(1)(a) s. 753.1(1)(b) s. 753.1(1)(c) 6. Section 752.1 Assessment a) Does the offender consent to the order? Yes No b) If order opposed, the basis on which it is opposed is: c) Does either party intend to call evidence on the application? Yes No d) If yes, outline the witnesses, the anticipated evidence and provide time estimates for evidence and argument: e) Have counsel discussed the material to be provided to the doctor preparing the assessment? Yes No i) If there are issues please set out the contentious material: 7. Time Estimates estimate for evidence and argument: estimate for evidence and argument: APPLICATION PHASE 8. Attorney General s Consent a) Has the received the Attorney General s consent? Yes No b) If no, when is the response expected? c) Is the consent to proceed with a: i) Dangerous Offender application ii) Long Term Offender application

Page 3 9. Evidentiary Basis upon which the application will be based a) Current conviction(s): synopsis to be attached to form i) If the trial was before a judge and jury, will either party request a hearing pursuant to s. 724 regarding the factual conclusions? Yes No Yes No If yes, time estimates for submissions: : : b) Prior convictions: Yes No i) If yes, list offence(s), date(s), whether trial or guilty plea, sentence(s) and attach a synopsis or brief summary of the offence(s): ii) Does the defence contest the admissibility of the evidence? Yes No iii) If yes, on what basis does the defence dispute admissibility? iv) How will the seek to introduce the evidence of the prior conviction(s)? Transcripts Oral testimony Court records Otherwise, please specify: v) If the evidence is admissible, does the defence dispute the method by which the seeks to introduce the evidence? Yes Comments: No c) Prior uncharged offences or other conduct: Yes No i) If yes, list incident(s), date(s), and attach a synopsis or brief summary of the incident(s): ii) Does the defence contest the admissibility of the evidence? Yes No iii) If yes, on what basis does the defence dispute admissibility? iv) How will the seek to introduce the evidence of the prior uncharged offences or other conduct? Transcripts Oral testimony Court records Otherwise, please specify:

Page 4 v) If the evidence is admissible, does the defence dispute the method by which the seeks to introduce the evidence? Yes Comments: No d) Other: Yes No i) If yes, attach a synopsis or brief summary of the evidence: ii) Does the defence contest the admissibility of the evidence? Yes No iii) If yes, on what basis does the defence dispute admissibility? iv) How will the seek to introduce the evidence? Transcripts Oral testimony Court records Otherwise, please specify: v) If the evidence is admissible, does the defence dispute the method by which the seeks to introduce the evidence? Yes Comments: No e) Expert Witnesses i) Does the intend to call expert witnesses? Yes No ii) Does the defence contest the admissibility of the expert evidence as disclosed? Yes No iii) Name(s) of expert witnesses: iv) Field(s) of expertise: v) Issues upon which the evidence will be introduced: vi) Basis upon which admissibility of evidence contested: legal relevance presence of an exclusionary rule logical relevance expert`s qualifications necessity in assisting trier of fact

Page 5 vii) Comments: viii) Time estimate for voir dire: 10. Disclosure: Complete? Yes No a) Outstanding issues: b) Lost/destroyed: c) Withheld/delayed: d) How are the outstanding issues to be addressed and by what date? 11. a) Third Party Records Applications: Yes No i) Relying upon: Mills, s. 278.2 Yes No O Connor Yes No ii) Nature of Records: iii) Time estimate for voir dire: iv) How long prior to trial does the applicant propose the motion be heard? b) Institutional Records i) Does the intend to introduce institutional records? Yes No ii) If yes, list institutions from which records are to be produced: iii) Issues upon which the records will be introduced: iv) Does the defence contest the admissibility of the records? Yes No

v) If yes, on what basis does the defence dispute admissibility? Page 6 12. Charter Applications a) Does the offender intend to bring any Charter application that has not been addressed above? Yes No b) If yes, will the application be to: i) Challenge legislation? Yes No ii) If yes, please provide details of challenge, nature of evidence to be called, time estimates for evidence and arguments: iii) Challenge to the admissibility of evidence, not noted above? Yes No iv) If yes, please provide details of challenge, nature of evidence to be called, time estimates for evidence and arguments: 13. Other legal issues requiring rulings either counsel anticipates will arise: N/A a) b) Time estimate for voir dire: 14. Expert Witnesses a) Does the defence intend to call expert witnesses? Yes No b) Name of expert(s): c) Qualifications of the proposed witness as an expert: d) Description of the area of expertise of the proposed witness that is sufficient to permit the other parties to inform themselves about that area of expertise: e) Does the contest the admissibility of the expert evidence? Yes No f) Basis upon which admissibility of the evidence is contested: legal relevance logical relevance necessity in assisting trier of fact presence of an exclusionary rule expert`s qualifications

Page 7 g) Comments: h) Time estimate for voir dire: 15. Competency of Witnesses a) Does the /defence intend to call any witness who is under the age of 14? Yes No b) Does the /defence intend to challenge the capacity of any witness on the basis of mental capacity? Yes No c) Name of witness, and basis of challenge: 16. Manner in which evidence is to be introduced a) Does the or defence seek to have any witness s evidence introduced: i) by video link, pursuant to s. 714.1 or s. 714.2? Yes No ii) by reading in evidence previously taken pursuant to s. 715? Yes No iii) by videotaped evidence, pursuant to s. 715.1? Yes No iv) as vulnerable witness, pursuant to s. 486.2? Yes No v) other means? Details: b) Does the opposing party consent to the admissibility of the evidence in the manner proposed? Yes No c) If opposed, estimated time for: 17. Will the or any witness apply for an order pursuant to s. 486.3, appointing counsel to cross-examine a witness if the offender is not represented by counsel? Yes No Does the offender oppose the order? Yes No 18. Support Person a) Will any witness require a support person, pursuant to s. 486.1(1)? Yes No Details:

Page 8 b) Will any witness require a support person, pursuant to s. 486.1(2)? Yes No Details: c) Does the defence oppose the order? Yes No 19. Publication Bans/Deferred Publication Orders a) Does the seek an order pursuant to s. 486.4 or 486.5, banning the publication of the complainant s identity? Yes No b) Does the defence oppose the order? Yes No c) If opposed, estimated time for: d) Does either party seek other publication bans or deferred publication orders? : Yes No : Yes No e) If yes, provide details of order sought, media to be notified, timing of hearing, time estimate for hearing: f) Does the other party oppose the application? Yes No g) If opposed, estimated time for: 20. Privilege Issues a) Will the be raising issues of privilege? Yes No b) Will the defence be raising issues of privilege? Yes No c) If yes, please specify the nature of evidence and issue of privilege: d) Basis upon which the party seeking admission relies: e) How does the party claiming privilege seek to introduce the evidence on the voir dire? i) Viva voce evidence Yes No ii) Agreed Statements of Fact Yes No iii) Witness statements Yes No iv) Transcripts Yes No f) Does the other party consent to the manner in which the evidence will be introduced on the voir dire? Yes No

Page 9 g) Comments: h) Time estimate for voir dire: 21. Gladue considerations a) Is the offender of Aboriginal heritage? Yes No b) Does the or defence anticipate calling any witnesses, introducing any evidence, or making any submission in relation to Gladue considerations? : Yes No : Yes No c) If yes, please indicate the witnesses to be called, the nature of their evidence, and provide time estimates for evidence and argument: d) Does the other counsel consent to the admissibility of the evidence? Yes No e) If no, please provide the basis of the objection: 22. Factual, evidentiary or legal admissions sought by the, or conceded by defence: Does the defence agree? 1) Yes No 2) Yes No 3) Yes No 4) Yes No 5) Yes No 23. Position of Offender in Court a) Will there be an application to have the offender sit at counsel table? Yes No b) Does the consent? Yes No c) If opposed, what is the nature of the evidence relied upon? d) Time estimate for voir dire:

24. Interpreters a) Does the offender require an interpreter? Yes No b) If yes, for which language(s)? Page 10 c) Do any witnesses require an interpreter? Yes No d) If yes, for which language(s)? e) Do any defence witnesses require an interpreter? Yes No f) If yes, for which language(s)? g) Should two interpreters be required? Yes No 25. Additional Courtroom Equipment required a) Elmo projector Yes No b) Television and VCR Yes No c) Television and CD player Yes No d) Television and DVD player Yes No e) Hearing devices Yes No f) Teleconference facilities Yes No g) Other: 26. Courtroom Security Issues a) Does any party believe that increased courtroom security issues are raised in this case? Yes No b) Does either party seek an order closing the courtroom to the public, pursuant to s. 486(1)? Yes No c) Details: 27. s Position a) On a Dangerous Offender application, is the seeking: i) an indeterminate sentence, pursuant to s. 753(4)(a)? Yes No ii) a determinate sentence followed by a long-term supervision order pursuant to s. 753(4)(b)? Yes No iii) a determinate sentence pursuant to s. 753(4)(c)? Yes No Length: b) On a Long-Term Offender application, the will seek: i) length of determinate sentence: ii) length of long-term supervision order:

28. Corollary Orders sought by the a) DNA Order: Yes No b) s. 109 prohibition: Yes No Duration: Page 11 c) s. 161 order: Yes No Duration: d) Sex Offender Registry Order: Yes No 29. Time estimates 10 years (s. 490.013(2)(a) maximum sentence: 2 5 years) 20 years (s. 490.013(2)(b) maximum sentence: 10 14 years) life (s. 490.013(2)(c) or (3) maximum sentence of life or if was bound by previous SOIRA order) estimate for evidence and argument: estimate for evidence and argument: 30. Counsel s Availability (including expert witnesses) : : Date: Case Supervision Judge: Counsel for : Counsel for : Was the Case Management Conference completed on today s date? Yes No If no, date and time at which the Case Management Conference will be completed/continued: Steps to take prior to continuation of Case Management Conference: Steps to take prior to continuation of Case Management Conference: