Citation to New Authority (Vetoed Legislation)

Similar documents
COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION 2. CALGUNS FOUNDATION INC., et al v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

Secretary of the Senate. Chief Clerk of the Assembly. Private Secretary of the Governor

Case 2:09-cv KJM-CKD Document 83 Filed 02/14/14 Page 1 of 5

Case3:12-cv SI Document17 Filed11/05/12 Page1 of 5

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT APPELLANT S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OPENING BRIEF

PETITION FOR CERTIFICATE OF REHABILITATION AND PARDON [Pursuant to Penal Code and ]

LEGISLATIVE INTENT SERVICE, INC.

Certificates of Rehabilitation in Fresno County Filing Instructions

October 10, To the Chief Justice and the Associate Justices of the California Supreme Court:

555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1200 Sacramento, California tel fax

AMENDED IN BOARD 10/16/2018 RESOLUTION NO

Case 2:09-cv KJM-CKD Document 27 Filed 08/05/10 Page 1 of 6. Alan Gura (Calif. Bar No. 178,221) Anthony R. Hakl (Calif. Bar No.

FILED SAN MATEO COUNTY

CALIFORNIA LOCAL AUTHORITY TO REGULATE FIREARMS

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Real Parties in Interest.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No John Teixeira; et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants,

SAMPLE FORM F NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

CACJ CALIFORNIA ATTORNEYS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE

No [DC# CV MJJ] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. RUSSELL ALLEN NORDYKE; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

MIKE FEUER CITY ATTORNEY

IN THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CHURCHILL

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. DIVISION [Number]

DAVID GENTRY, JAMES PARKER, MARK MID LAM, JAMES BASS, and CALGUNS SHOOTING SPORTS ASSOCIATION,

a. Name of person served:

HAROLD P. STURGEON, Plaintiff and Petitioner, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants and Respondents, and

March 25, Request for Publication Concerned Dublin Citizens v. City of Dublin (First District Court of Appeal Case No.

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO SENATE BILL 719

No [DC No.: 2:11-cv SJO-SS] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Charles Nichols, Plaintiff-Appellant

MAY 28, Referred to Committee on Judiciary. SUMMARY Makes technical corrections to measures passed by the 78th Legislative Session.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiffs and Appellants, Defendants and Res ondents.

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. Senate Bill 719 CHAPTER... AN ACT

Elections. Presidential Primaries. Political Party Offices. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.

B CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE. LINDA DE ROGATIS, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 2468

City Hall 539 Phoenix Street South Haven, Michigan Telephone (269) Fax (269)

Centex Homes v. Superior Court (City of San Diego)

HOW TO DO A COUNTY INITIATIVE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO / OAKLAND DIVISION SECOND AMENDMENT FOURTH AMENDMENT

Consider positions on current state legislation

How to Fill a Vacancy

Petition for Relief Packet

WRIT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MANDATE (MANDAMUS)

Case 2:10-cv JAM -EFB Document 53 Filed 01/18/12 Page 1 of 7

Purpose of Mandatory Fee Arbitration

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER RESPONDING TO ELDER/DEPENDENT ADULT ABUSE RESTRAINING ORDER

Case 1:11-cv AWI-SKO Document 125 Filed 12/01/14 Page 1 of 8

Brief: Petition for Rehearing

If you are applying for a government-issued license, certificate, or permit, you must disclose your conviction and expungement.

MOTION TO STRIKE OPENING BRIEF; PROPOSED ORDER

Referred to Committee on Judiciary. SUMMARY Makes various changes relating to public safety. (BDR )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA CASE NO.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

Chief Clerk of the Assembly. Secretary of the Senate. Private Secretary of the Governor

Request for Publication

CACJ CALIFORNIA ATTORNEYS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER ANSWERING A BREACH OF CONTRACT COMPLAINT

A Bill Regular Session, 2019 HOUSE BILL 1875

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF Applicant's County of Residence

ORANGE COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS 1300 S.GRAND AVENUE, BLDG. C SANTA ANA, CA (714)

HOUSE BILL No As Amended by House Committee

Case 2:09-cv KJM-CKD Document 35 Filed 09/26/11 Page 1 of 13

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Hall of Justice. 400 County Center, 2 Floor Redwood City, CA

Case No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICHELLE FLANAGAN, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

GUIDE TO FILING REFERENDA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. Judge CASE. Civil Action PETITION FOR RELIEF IN DISCOVERY DISPUTE

i (".n''''6 ORDINANCE NO. _

March 16, Via TrueFiling

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

December 10, Cohen v. DIRECTV, No. S177734

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiffs-Appellants, Decision Filed Mar. 5, 2014 ED PRIETO; COUNTY OF YOLO,

HOUSE BILL No {As Amended by House Committee of the Whole} As Amended by House Committee

LEGISLATIVE INTENT SERVICE, INC.

Supreme Court of Florida

House Bill 2357 Introduced and printed pursuant to House Rule Presession filed (at the request of House Interim Committee on Judiciary)

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER

Case 5:08-cv RMW Document 7 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff,

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Senate Bill 868 SUMMARY

LEVELS & BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ORDINANCE NO: AN ORDINANCE TO VACATE, REPAIR, OR DEMOLISH UNSAFE STRUCTURES

Wednesday, March 1, The Honorable Rep. Richard Hudson 429 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FONTANA DISTRICT. Defendant COUNT 1

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Hall of Justice and Records 400 County Center Redwood City, California

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs and Appellants

TO BE FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

Case 3:13-cv SC Document 39 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 5

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Case 2:09-cv MCE-KJM Document 8 Filed 05/07/2009 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:08-cr OWW Document 86 Filed 08/21/2008 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

1 SB By Senator Williams. 4 RFD: Fiscal Responsibility and Economic Development. 5 First Read: 07-FEB-17 6 PFD: 05/12/2016.

TMCCP Presents Legislative Update Seminar. August 20-21, 2015, San Marcos, Texas HANDOUTS FOR. Municipal Court

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

December 17, (Third District Court of Appeal Case No. C066996)

SENATE BILL No Introduced by Senators Lara and Mitchell. February 16, 2018

Transcription:

Law Offices of Donald Kilmer A Professional Corporation. 1645 Willow Street, Suite 150 San Jose, California 95125 Don@DKLawOffice.com Phone: 408/264-8489 Fax: 408/264-8487 October 16, 2013 Chief Justice and Association Justices California Supreme Court 350 McAllister Street San Francisco, California 94102 Re: Citation to New Authority (Vetoed Legislation) Calguns Foundation, Inc., v. County of San Mateo; Case No.: S212356 Trial Court Case No.: CIV 509185 Court of Appeals Case No.: A 136092 Date of Original Un-Published Decision: Jul. 15, 2013 Date of Publication Order: Aug. 2, 2013 Petition for Review Filed: Sept. 10, 2013 Answer Filed Oct. 1, 2013 Reply Filed Oct. 11, 2013 Dear Chief Justice and Associate Justices: Pursuant to California Rule of Court 8.254, Petitioners hereby give notice that Assembly Bill 180 a bill to give the City of Oakland the power to override state laws and impose stricter gun registration and/or licencing in that city was vetoed by Governor Jerry Brown (former Mayor of Oakland) on October 11, 2013. A copy of the Bill and its Status from the California Legislature is attached as Exhibit A. Governor Brown s Veto Message is attached as Exhibit B. Respectfully, Donald Kilmer Attorney for the Petitioners cc: see attached proof of service Page 1 of 1

Exhibit A

Assembly Bill No. 180 Passed the Assembly May 28, 2013 Chief Clerk of the Assembly Passed the Senate September 6, 2013 Secretary of the Senate This bill was received by the Governor this day of, 2013, at o clock m. Private Secretary of the Governor

AB 180 2 CHAPTER An act to amend Section 53071 of the Government Code, and to amend Section 25605 of the Penal Code, relating to local government. legislative counsel s digest AB 180, Bonta. Registration and licensing of firearms: City of Oakland. Existing law states that it is the intent of the Legislature to occupy the whole field of regulation of registration or licensing of commercially manufactured firearms and that provisions of existing law are exclusive of all local regulations relating to registration or licensing of commercially manufactured firearms, as specified. Existing law makes a person guilty of carrying a concealed firearm under specified circumstances. Existing law makes a person guilty of openly carrying an unloaded handgun when that person carries upon his or her person an exposed and unloaded handgun outside a vehicle while in or on specified locations. Existing law specifies that those provisions are not applicable to a person who carries any handgun anywhere within the person s place of residence, place of business, or on specified property. Existing law prohibits a permit or license to purchase a handgun from being required of any person to purchase, own, possess, keep, or carry, a handgun within the person s place of residence, place of business, or on specified property. This bill would authorize the City of Oakland to enact an ordinance or regulation, applicable solely to its residents and in accordance with federal law, that is more restrictive than state law regulating the registration or licensing of commercially manufactured firearms. The bill would also provide that those provisions relating to the carrying of a handgun within the person s place of residence, place of business, or on specified property do not affect the application of the aforementioned authorization to the City of Oakland. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations regarding the need for special legislation. 95

3 AB 180 The people of the State of California do enact as follows: SECTION 1. Section 53071 of the Government Code is amended to read: 53071. (a) It is the intent of the Legislature to occupy the whole field of regulation of the registration or licensing of commercially manufactured firearms as encompassed by the provisions of the Penal Code, and such provisions shall be exclusive of all local regulations, relating to registration or licensing of commercially manufactured firearms, by any political subdivision as defined in Section 1721 of the Labor Code. (b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the City of Oakland may enact an ordinance or regulation, applicable solely to its residents and in accordance with federal law, that is more restrictive than state law regulating the registration or licensing of commercially manufactured firearms as encompassed by the Penal Code. SEC. 2. Section 25605 of the Penal Code is amended to read: 25605. (a) Section 25400 and Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 26350) of Division 5 shall not apply to or affect any citizen of the United States or legal resident over the age of 18 years who resides or is temporarily within this state, and who is not within the excepted classes prescribed by Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 29800) or Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 29900) of Division 9 of this title, or Section 8100 or 8103 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, who carries, either openly or concealed, anywhere within the citizen s or legal resident s place of residence, place of business, or on private property owned or lawfully possessed by the citizen or legal resident, any handgun. (b) A permit or license to purchase, own, possess, keep, or carry, either openly or concealed, shall not be required of any citizen of the United States or legal resident over the age of 18 years who resides or is temporarily within this state, and who is not within the excepted classes prescribed by Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 29800) or Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 29900) of Division 9 of this title, or Section 8100 or 8103 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, to purchase, own, possess, keep, or carry, either openly or concealed, a handgun within the citizen s or legal resident s place of residence, place of business, or on private property owned or lawfully possessed by the citizen or legal resident. 95

AB 180 4 (c) This section shall not be construed as affecting the application of Sections 25850 to 26055, inclusive. (d) This section shall not be construed as affecting the application of subdivision (b) of Section 53071 of the Government Code. SEC. 3. The Legislature finds and declares that a special law is necessary and that a general law cannot be made applicable within the meaning of Section 16 of Article IV of the California Constitution because the City of Oakland is suffering from the worst gun violence among cities in the state, with 131 homicides and over 4,000 gun-related crimes in 2012. 95

Exhibit B

Proof of Service I, Christina Kilmer, Declare: 1. At the time of service I was at least 18 years of age and not a party to this action. 2. My business address is 1645 Willow Street, Suite 150; San Jose, CA 95125. 3. On October 16, 2013, I mailed a copy of September 3, 2013 Letter to The California Supreme Court - Citation to New Authority (Vetoed Legislation), from San Jose, CA to: David Silberman Office of County Counsel th 400 County Center 6 Floor Redwood City, CA 94063-1662 Aimee Feinberg U.C. Davis School of Law 400 Mrak Hall Drive Davis, CA 95616 Superior Court, San Mateo 400 County Center Redwood City, CA 94063 California Court of Appeal First Appellate District-Division Two 350 McAllister Street San Francisco, CA 94102 By enclosing the document in an envelope with U.S. Postage fully prepaid. I declare under penalty if perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on October 16, 2013 in San Jose, CA. Christina Kilmer