Impact of Japan s ODA Loan on Asian Economic Developments

Similar documents
Japanese External Policies and the Asian Economic Developments

Asian Development Bank

Asian Development Bank

China s Aid Approaches in the Changing International Aid Architecture

Japan s Policy to Strengthen Economic Partnership. November 2003

UNDER EMBARGO UNTIL 9 APRIL 2018, 15:00 HOURS PARIS TIME

Briefing Paper Pakistan Floods 2010: Country Aid Factsheet

Aid spending by Development Assistance Committee donors in 2015

January final ODA data for an initial analysis of key points. factsheet

Presented by Sarah O Keefe External Relations Officer European Representative Office Frankfurt, Germany

WORLDWIDE DISTRIBUTION OF PRIVATE FINANCIAL ASSETS

Mapping physical therapy research

Global Trends in Location Selection Final results for 2005

April aid spending by Development Assistance Committee (DAC) donors in factsheet

How Does Aid Support Women s Economic Empowerment?

Inclusive global growth: a framework to think about the post-2015 agenda

SEPTEMBER TRADE UPDATE ASIA TAKES THE LEAD

2013 (received) 2015 (received) Local Local Local Local currency. currency (millions) currency. (millions)

Summary of the Results

Aid to gender equality and women s empowerment AN OVERVIEW

CHAPTER I: SIZE AND GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE POPULATION

2016 (received) Local Local Local Local currency. currency (millions) currency. (millions)

Mobility of Rights 1

Exploring relations between Governance, Trust and Well-being

The High Cost of Low Educational Performance. Eric A. Hanushek Ludger Woessmann

Push and Pull Factors for Japanese Manufacturing Companies Moving Production Overseas

2.3 IMMIGRATION: THE NUMBERS

The Asian Development Bank. Transportation Infrastructure in Asia and the Pacific

The Finnish Economic Development as an Example of Endogenous Economic Growth

APPENDIXES. 1: Regional Integration Tables. Table Descriptions. Regional Groupings. Table A1: Trade Share Asia (% of total trade)

South Africa - A publisher s perspective. STM/PASA conference 11 June, 2012, Cape Town Mayur Amin, SVP Research & Academic Relations

UNDER EMBARGO UNTIL 10 APRIL 2019, 15:00 HOURS PARIS TIME. Development aid drops in 2018, especially to neediest countries

Trends in international higher education

Aid for Trade in Asia and the Pacific: ADB's Perspective

List of Main Imports to the United States

2015 (received) 2016 (received) 2017 (received) Local Local Local Local currency. currency. currency (millions) (millions)

KOREA S ODA AND SOUTHEAST ASIA

The Conference Board Total Economy Database Summary Tables November 2016

Education Quality and Economic Development

The International Investment Index Report IIRC, Wuhan University

3. Sustainable Development

Does Korea Follow Japan in Foreign Aid? Relationships between Aid and FDI

On aid orphans and darlings (Aid Effectiveness in aid allocation by respective donor type)

Taiwan s Development Strategy for the Next Phase. Dr. San, Gee Vice Chairman Taiwan External Trade Development Council Taiwan

Overview of JODI Gas Milestones and Beta Test Launch

Rethinking Australian Migration

Trademarks FIGURE 8 FIGURE 9. Highlights. Figure 8 Trademark applications worldwide. Figure 9 Trademark application class counts worldwide

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE GREEK BILATERAL AND MULTILATERAL OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT CO-OPERATION AND ASSISTANCE YEAR 2014

CONFERENCE ON DISARMAMENT

SCALE OF ASSESSMENT OF MEMBERS' CONTRIBUTIONS FOR 1994

BRIEFING. International Migration: The UK Compared with other OECD Countries.

How many students study abroad and where do they go?

KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA NATION RELIGION KING 3 TOURISM STATISTICS REPORT. September 2010

Contributions to UNHCR For Budget Year 2014 As at 31 December 2014

SECTION THREE BENEFITS OF THE JSEPA

Where is the Money? Post-Disaster Foreign Aid Flows. Oscar Becerra University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

ASIAN TRANSFORMATIONS: An Inquiry into the Development of Nations

Monthly Inbound Update June th August 2017

Launch of the UK Built Environment Advisory Group

24 Negocios infographics oldemar. Mexico Means

Proliferation of FTAs in East Asia

BULGARIAN TRADE WITH EU IN JANUARY 2017 (PRELIMINARY DATA)

World trade interdependencies: a New Zealand perspective

QGIS.org - Donations and Sponsorship Analysis 2016

INCLUSIVE GROWTH AND POLICIES: THE ASIAN EXPERIENCE. Thangavel Palanivel Chief Economist for Asia-Pacific UNDP, New York

KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA NATION RELIGION KING 3 TOURISM STATISTICS REPORT. March 2010

Statistics to Measure Offshoring and its Impact

OECD Health Data 2009 comparing health statistics across OECD countries

Hilde C. Bjørnland. BI Norwegian Business School. Advisory Panel on Macroeconomic Models and Methods Oslo, 27 November 2018

BULGARIAN TRADE WITH EU IN THE PERIOD JANUARY - MARCH 2016 (PRELIMINARY DATA)

ANNEX 2. Donor Matrix showing the indicative allocations per sector

BULGARIAN TRADE WITH EU IN THE PERIOD JANUARY - JUNE 2014 (PRELIMINARY DATA)

Year. Fig.1 Population projections

The End of Textiles Quotas: A case study of the impact on Bangladesh

Widening of Inequality in Japan: Its Implications

Toward Inclusive Growth in Indonesia : Improving Trade and Employment

Equity and Excellence in Education from International Perspectives

Round 1. This House would ban the use of zero-hour contracts. Proposition v. Opposition

Student Mobility: Implications for the ASEAN Labor

New York County Lawyers Association Continuing Legal Education Institute 14 Vesey Street, New York, N.Y (212)

The Global Economic Crisis Sectoral coverage

Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 2013

HUMAN RESOURCES IN R&D

A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

The EU on the move: A Japanese view

GERMANY, JAPAN AND INTERNATIONAL PAYMENT IMBALANCES

The globalization of inequality

Inclusion and Gender Equality in China

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level

Dirk Pilat:

PISA 2015 in Hong Kong Result Release Figures and Appendices Accompanying Press Release

92 El Salvador El Salvador El Salvador El Salvador El Salvador Nicaragua Nicaragua Nicaragua 1

Euromalt position paper on the EU-ASEAN trade negotiations

On the Future of Criminal Offender DNA Databases

APPENDIX 1: MEASURES OF CAPITALISM AND POLITICAL FREEDOM

Chapter 5: Internationalization & Industrialization

A Long Term Approach To Bilateral Aid: The Case of Germany

Putting the Experience of Chinese Inventors into Context. Richard Miller, Office of Chief Economist May 19, 2015

BULGARIAN TRADE WITH EU IN THE PERIOD JANUARY - FEBRUARY 2017 (PRELIMINARY DATA)

Asylum Levels and Trends in Industrialized Countries. First Quarter, 2005

Transcription:

Impact of Japan s ODA Loan on Asian Economic Developments Ken-ichi RIETI/MoFA, Japan June 2001 4th GTAP Annual Conference Table of Contents Japanese Official Development Assistance (ODA) Aid Philosophy Recent Trends Review of ODA Loan Impact of Japan s ODA Loan Framework of Model Simulations Impact on Asian Recipient Countries Distribution of Income Gains

Summary The fundamental aid philosophy of Japan is to support the self-help efforts of developing countries. In 1992, Japanese cabinet approved the Official Development Assistance (ODA) Charter, which comprehensively stated Japan s basic aid policies. Japan has been the world s largest donor country during the last ten years (Chart 1), although Japan s ODA ratio over GDP remains lower than the UN target of 0.7 per cent (Chart 2). Several features of Japan s ODA include a) high percentage of loans and high share of bilateral basis (Table 1), b) higher untied share while lower grant share (Chart 3), c) high percentage of loans to Asia (Chart 4), and d) high weighting for economic infrastructures (Chart 5). Japan s ODA will be provided in a selective manner improving its effectiveness, efficiency and transparency. Its allocation both by regions and sectors are reviewed. Impact of Japan s ODA capital flows into seven Asian countries: China, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, Viet Nam and India (Chart 7); were simulated by a modified version of the standard GTAP Model with Version 4 database aggregating to 16 regions and 6 sectors (Table 2). Real GDP is estimated to expand by around 4 to 28 per cent and prices will decline by around 2 to 12 per cent in recipient countries (Chart 8). This would result in improvements of international competitiveness, therefore external balances, in those countries (Chart 9). In addition, industrial structures would be more or less affected by reallocation of production endowments (Chart 10). Income gains would also be shared by outside recipient countries through trade and income linkages under the assumption of dynamic capital accumulation (Chart 11). Those benefits could vary among the economies according to the destination of Japan s ODA (Chart 12). Multipliers of capital increases in seven Asian countries are shown in Annex Tables.

Japan s Aid Philosophy Support for Self-help Efforts Economic development is only possible when the government and citizens of a developing country make unremitting efforts to improve their current conditions. An aid donor should not impose its plans on aid recipients but rather should do its best to search out and discover nascent independent projects in a developing country and then lend a deft and experienced helping hand to ensure that small seeds can grow to fruition. 1 ODA Charter: Principles Balancing development with environmental concerns Avoiding the use of aid for military purposes Paying attention to the military expenditures of aid recipients, their development and production of missiles and weapons of mass destruction, and their import and export of arms Paying attention to the promotion of democratization, the introduction of a market economy, and the securing of basic human rights and freedoms 2

Chart 1: Trends in Major Countries' ODA (billion US dollars) 20.0 Japan USA 18.0 France Germany 16.0 Italy UK 14.0 Canada 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 3 Chart 2: ODA/GNP Ratios in DAC (1998/99) (%) 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 Denmark Norway Netherlands Sweden Luxembourg France Switzerland Japan Finland Ireland Belguium Canada NewZealand Australia UN Target Germany Portugal Austria UK Spain Grece Italy USA 4

Table 1: Japan's ODA in 1999 (Net disbursement basis) Billion US $ Billion Yen Share (%) Bilateral ODA 10.498 1,195.7 68.2 Grants 5.539 630.9 36.0 Grant Aid 2.340 266.5 15.2 Technical Cooperation 3.199 364.4 20.8 Government Loans 4.959 564.8 32.2 Disbursement 7.987 909.7 51.9 Repayment 3.029 345.0 19.7 Contribution and Subscriptions 4.888 556.7 31.8 to International Organization Total 15.385 1,752.4 100.0 5 Chart 3: Quality of ODA (1997/98) (%) 100 80 Japan Germany UK Untied Share 60 40 20 France USA Italy Canada 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 Grant Share (%) 6

Chart 4: Geographical Distribution (1999) (billion US dollars) 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Asia Middle East Africa Latin America Oceania Grant Aid Technical Cooperation Loans Europe Unspecified 7 Chart 5: Sectoral Distribution (1999) Grant Aid Technical Cooperation Education Health Water Supply and Sanitation Other Social Infrastructure Transport and Storage Energy Other Economic Infrastructure Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries Other Production Sectors Multisector Assistance Loans 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 (billion US dollars) 8

Chart 6: Relative Level of ODA (US dollars) 12.0 10.0 8.0 Sri Lanka Viet Nam 6.0 Indonesia 4.0 Philippine 2.0 Bangladesh Morocco China 0.0 Per Capita ODA (Ave. 1997-99) Thailand Peru Tunisia Malaysia 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 Per Capita GDP (1998) (thousand US dollars) 9 Review of Japan s ODA Loan Significance as a Recipient Country Political and Economic Relations to Japan Conformity with the Principles of the ODA Charter Economic Performance Appropriate Development Strategy and Plan Ability of Implementing Projects Appropriate Amount of ODA Loan Impact on Development Strategy and Plan Past Records Debt Service Ratio Comparison with the Other Recipient Countries The Share of Japan s ODA among Donors 10

Macroeconomic Assumptions in Simulation Constant Return to Scale, Perfect Competition Exogenous Labour Supply by the Economies Endogenous Capital Accumulation (in the rest of seven Asian economies) under the fixed saving ratio without international capital flows which equalize rate of return on capitals Endogenous Trade Balance 11 Table 2: Regional and Sectoral Aggregation Countries and Regions Industries/Commodities Japan South Asia AGR: Agriculture, Forestry & Fishery China Asian NIEs MFG: Mining & Manufacturing Indonesia Oceania CNS: Construction Malaysia USA T_T: Trade & Transport the Philippines Canada OSP: Other Private Services Thailand Latin America PUB: Energy & Public Services Viet Nam Western Europe India Rest of World 12

Chart 7: Cumulated ODA Loan by Sectors (End of FY 1999, trillion yen) 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 Commodity Loan and Others Social Infrastructure Irrigation and Water Electricity and Gas Communications Transportation Mining and Industry Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 China Indonesia Malaysia Philippine Thailand Viet Nam India 13 Table 3: ODA Capital Flows to Asian Countries (percentage of sectoral capitals) AGR MFG T_T PUB Total China 6.9 0.8 20.1 36.9 8.9 Indonesia 7.8 6.3 44.4 153.6 25.9 Malaysia 2.8 5.2 13.6 286.7 20.6 the Philippines 22.4 19.4 68.0 307.8 48.5 Thailand 26.9 2.5 37.8 150.2 17.6 Viet Nam 0.0 4.2 263.9 471.6 143.9 India 4.8 10.5 13.0 44.9 15.3 14

Chart 8: Impact on Output and Prices (%) 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0-5.0-10.0-15.0 Real GDP GDP Deflator China Indonesia Malaysia Philippine Thailand Viet Nam India 15 Chart 9: Impact on Trade (%) (%) 70.0 1.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 Export Volume, left scale Import Volume, left scale Trade Balance (percentage of GDP), right scale China Indonesia Malaysia Phillipine Thailand Viet Nam India 0.5 0.0-0.5-1.0-1.5-2.0-2.5 16

Chart 10: Impact on Industrial Structures (percentage shares in nominal GDP, inside: without ODA; outside: with ODA) China Indonesia Malaysia Philippine 15.2 4.0 11.4 4.0 11.5 15.2 19.819.7 9.8 39.8 39.9 9.7 10.8 11.1 6.5 10.8 10.7 7.5 20.4 32.0 21.4 32.0 18.5 18.2 6.3 2.8 8.5 6.8 16.5 16.3 3.07.6 49.1 17.2 48.5 17.3 15.7 10.1 16.310.2 14.215.0 27.526.4 8.8 10.0 22.1 23.7 Thailand 6.2 6.2 7.4 6.0 12.1 11.9 6.57.6 46.044.0 22.1 24.0 Viet Nam 11.6 4.4 4.9 14.1 22.2 25.0 4.4 24.1 11.5 30.0 20.5 27.4 India 12.8 7.4 13.1 25.9 7.4 25.8 11.110.8 10.4 32.5 10.4 32.3 AGR MFG CNS T_T OSP PUB 17 Chart 11: Economic Gains by Regions Rest of World Western Europe Latin America Canada Japan (Sheres in world GDP expansion) China USA Oceania Asian NIEs South Asia India Viet Nam Thailand Malaysia the Phillipines Indonesia 18

Chart 12: Welfare Gains outside Recipients Japan (billion US dollars) 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 South Asia Asian NIEs Oceania USA Canada Latin America Western Europe Rest of World ODA in China ODA in Malaysia ODA in Thailand ODA in India ODA in Indonesia ODA in Philippine ODA in Viet Nam 19

Annex: Impact of Capital Increases by 1 bil. US Dollars Impact of capital increases in seven Asian countries (China, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, Malaysia, Viet Nam and India) on regional real GDPs is shown in Annex Tables. Simulations were carried out shocking a variable qo ( capital, REG) by a certain percentage, which corresponds to 1 billion US dollars in the each economies, in an exogenous manner. Those increases in capitals were fully allocated to specific sectors ( AGR, MFG, CNS, T_T, OSP, PUB ) shocking a variable qfe ( capital, PROD_COMM, REG) respectively swapping with a variable tf. While, those capital allocation were endogenously solved in cases titled Unspecified. i Annex Table 1: Impact of Capital Increases in China (percentage changes of real GDP) AGR MFG CNS T_T OSP PUB Unspecified Japan -0.0056 0.0103 0.0068 0.0177 0.0048 0.0018 0.0078 China 0.1478 0.1774 0.1734 0.1670 0.1700 0.1709 0.1753 Indonesia -0.0064 0.0126 0.0082 0.0217 0.0058 0.0022 0.0096 Malaysia -0.0073 0.0145 0.0100 0.0258 0.0073 0.0026 0.0112 the Phillipines -0.0060 0.0125 0.0085 0.0221 0.0064 0.0022 0.0097 Thailand -0.0106 0.0175 0.0110 0.0294 0.0075 0.0029 0.0130 Viet Nam -0.0039 0.0105 0.0062 0.0168 0.0038 0.0020 0.0077 India -0.0049 0.0101 0.0067 0.0174 0.0046 0.0018 0.0077 South Asia -0.0040 0.0113 0.0073 0.0191 0.0046 0.0021 0.0085 Asian NIEs -0.0068 0.0108 0.0080 0.0189 0.0053 0.0020 0.0085 Oceania -0.0055 0.0104 0.0066 0.0175 0.0046 0.0019 0.0078 USA -0.0049 0.0090 0.0058 0.0153 0.0041 0.0016 0.0068 Canada -0.0047 0.0105 0.0068 0.0182 0.0046 0.0019 0.0079 Latin America -0.0076 0.0140 0.0090 0.0238 0.0064 0.0025 0.0106 Western Europe -0.0041 0.0082 0.0053 0.0140 0.0036 0.0015 0.0062 Rest of World -0.0065 0.0124 0.0079 0.0209 0.0056 0.0022 0.0093 World -0.0013 0.0140 0.0106 0.0205 0.0086 0.0060 0.0116 ii

Annex Table 2: Impact of Capital Increases in Indonesia (percentage changes of real GDP) AGR MFG CNS T_T OSP PUB Unspecified Japan -0.0002 0.0051 0.0037 0.0207 0.0007-0.0014 0.0048 China 0.0021 0.0057 0.0045 0.0265 0.0007-0.0020 0.0058 Indonesia 0.4286 0.4937 0.4965 0.4652 0.4882 0.4778 0.5011 Malaysia 0.0011 0.0076 0.0055 0.0312 0.0012-0.0021 0.0073 the Phillipines 0.0025 0.0045 0.0044 0.0246 0.0009-0.0018 0.0052 Thailand -0.0012 0.0089 0.0055 0.0352 0.0004-0.0028 0.0079 Viet Nam 0.0005 0.0033 0.0027 0.0158 0.0009-0.0011 0.0034 India 0.0001 0.0052 0.0037 0.0206 0.0007-0.0013 0.0049 South Asia 0.0057 0.0042 0.0036 0.0213 0.0004-0.0016 0.0046 Asian NIEs -0.0012 0.0056 0.0042 0.0224 0.0009-0.0015 0.0053 Oceania 0.0000 0.0051 0.0035 0.0203 0.0007-0.0014 0.0047 USA -0.0003 0.0046 0.0031 0.0179 0.0005-0.0012 0.0042 Canada 0.0009 0.0051 0.0036 0.0212 0.0005-0.0015 0.0048 Latin America -0.0003 0.0070 0.0048 0.0279 0.0009-0.0019 0.0065 Western Europe 0.0002 0.0041 0.0028 0.0164 0.0005-0.0011 0.0038 Rest of World -0.0002 0.0063 0.0042 0.0246 0.0008-0.0017 0.0058 World 0.0030 0.0084 0.0069 0.0229 0.0040 0.0020 0.0081 iii Annex Table 3: Impact of Capital Increases in Malaysia (percentage changes of real GDP) AGR MFG CNS T_T OSP PUB Unspecified Japan 0.0027 0.0108 0.0066 0.0131 0.0034 0.0018 0.0084 China 0.0066 0.0129 0.0083 0.0167 0.0039 0.0020 0.0104 Indonesia 0.0042 0.0134 0.0078 0.0161 0.0039 0.0022 0.0104 Malaysia 0.7755 1.5107 1.3180 1.0042 1.1530 1.0382 1.4044 the Phillipines 0.0058 0.0138 0.0087 0.0168 0.0050 0.0024 0.0111 Thailand 0.0058 0.0168 0.0102 0.0212 0.0049 0.0026 0.0132 Viet Nam 0.0026 0.0080 0.0046 0.0104 0.0033 0.0012 0.0063 India 0.0052 0.0115 0.0066 0.0133 0.0031 0.0018 0.0089 South Asia 0.0101 0.0112 0.0070 0.0138 0.0029 0.0015 0.0091 Asian NIEs 0.0012 0.0116 0.0081 0.0143 0.0043 0.0024 0.0093 Oceania 0.0042 0.0106 0.0061 0.0128 0.0031 0.0017 0.0082 USA 0.0032 0.0093 0.0054 0.0112 0.0027 0.0015 0.0072 Canada 0.0049 0.0109 0.0064 0.0133 0.0030 0.0017 0.0085 Latin America 0.0054 0.0145 0.0084 0.0176 0.0043 0.0024 0.0113 Western Europe 0.0035 0.0086 0.0050 0.0103 0.0024 0.0013 0.0067 Rest of World 0.0043 0.0131 0.0075 0.0154 0.0037 0.0019 0.0101 World 0.0062 0.0154 0.0105 0.0158 0.0069 0.0052 0.0127 iv

Annex Table 4: Impact of Capital Increases in the Philippines (percentage changes of real GDP) AGR MFG CNS T_T OSP PUB Unspecified Japan 0.0002-0.0011 0.0009 0.0113-0.0004 0.0009 0.0006 China 0.0009-0.0021 0.0011 0.0144-0.0005 0.0010 0.0006 Indonesia 0.0006-0.0009 0.0010 0.0138-0.0006 0.0010 0.0008 Malaysia -0.0010-0.0028 0.0019 0.0168 0.0007 0.0017 0.0012 the Phillipines 1.1235 1.8489 1.5726 1.2461 1.5089 1.3877 1.6735 Thailand 0.0007-0.0014 0.0009 0.0184-0.0014 0.0011 0.0007 Viet Nam -0.0031-0.0069 0.0004 0.0078 0.0022 0.0000-0.0005 India 0.0005-0.0010 0.0009 0.0110-0.0004 0.0009 0.0006 South Asia 0.0005-0.0018 0.0013 0.0112-0.0004 0.0008 0.0006 Asian NIEs -0.0001-0.0013 0.0015 0.0122-0.0003 0.0011 0.0009 Oceania 0.0006-0.0008 0.0006 0.0108-0.0006 0.0007 0.0005 USA 0.0010-0.0005 0.0005 0.0097-0.0006 0.0007 0.0005 Canada 0.0014-0.0009 0.0007 0.0114-0.0009 0.0008 0.0005 Latin America 0.0007-0.0012 0.0009 0.0150-0.0006 0.0011 0.0008 Western Europe 0.0008-0.0007 0.0005 0.0088-0.0006 0.0006 0.0004 Rest of World 0.0007-0.0010 0.0009 0.0130-0.0005 0.0010 0.0007 World 0.0035 0.0038 0.0046 0.0137 0.0032 0.0042 0.0047 v Annex Table 5: Impact of Capital Increases in Thailand (percentage changes of real GDP) AGR MFG CNS T_T OSP PUB Unspecified Japan 0.0018 0.0063 0.0040 0.0309 0.0024 0.0002 0.0057 China 0.0048 0.0073 0.0052 0.0396 0.0031 0.0001 0.0069 Indonesia 0.0025 0.0075 0.0047 0.0375 0.0029 0.0001 0.0068 Malaysia 0.0027 0.0113 0.0062 0.0467 0.0040 0.0008 0.0098 the Phillipines 0.0029 0.0083 0.0052 0.0392 0.0036 0.0004 0.0075 Thailand 0.4595 0.6302 0.6538 0.4765 0.6840 0.5779 0.6444 Viet Nam 0.0045 0.0069 0.0019 0.0270 0.0015 0.0002 0.0054 India 0.0038 0.0059 0.0039 0.0302 0.0023 0.0002 0.0055 South Asia 0.0045 0.0074 0.0039 0.0324 0.0018 0.0002 0.0064 Asian NIEs 0.0011 0.0065 0.0050 0.0333 0.0030 0.0002 0.0062 Oceania 0.0023 0.0061 0.0036 0.0300 0.0022 0.0001 0.0055 USA 0.0019 0.0054 0.0031 0.0263 0.0019 0.0001 0.0048 Canada 0.0033 0.0062 0.0038 0.0312 0.0021 0.0001 0.0056 Latin America 0.0029 0.0083 0.0050 0.0411 0.0031 0.0002 0.0075 Western Europe 0.0024 0.0049 0.0029 0.0242 0.0016 0.0001 0.0044 Rest of World 0.0023 0.0079 0.0043 0.0364 0.0025 0.0002 0.0069 World 0.0049 0.0096 0.0074 0.0317 0.0061 0.0035 0.0091 vi

Annex Table 6: Impact of Capital Increses in Viet Nam (percentage changes of real GDP) AGR MFG CNS T_T OSP PUB Unspecified Japan -0.0019 0.0056 0.0038 0.0122-0.0007 0.0002 0.0041 China 0.0010 0.0029 0.0047 0.0143-0.0022-0.0011 0.0036 Indonesia 0.0043 0.0044 0.0042 0.0147-0.0016-0.0001 0.0043 Malaysia -0.0031 0.0262 0.0039 0.0264 0.0024 0.0058 0.0128 the Phillipines -0.0038 0.0161 0.0052 0.0194 0.0019 0.0034 0.0092 Thailand -0.0019 0.0116 0.0067 0.0214-0.0003 0.0016 0.0081 Viet Nam 6.5969 7.9635 8.8659 7.2424 7.7952 7.5062 8.5307 India 0.0002 0.0047 0.0038 0.0119-0.0008 0.0001 0.0039 South Asia -0.0022 0.0045 0.0050 0.0121-0.0007 0.0000 0.0041 Asian NIEs -0.0041 0.0065 0.0055 0.0134 0.0001 0.0006 0.0052 Oceania -0.0003 0.0046 0.0034 0.0115-0.0010 0.0000 0.0036 USA -0.0015 0.0048 0.0029 0.0104-0.0007 0.0001 0.0034 Canada -0.0004 0.0058 0.0034 0.0125-0.0009 0.0003 0.0041 Latin America -0.0025 0.0074 0.0047 0.0161-0.0011 0.0002 0.0053 Western Europe -0.0006 0.0046 0.0026 0.0097-0.0006 0.0002 0.0032 Rest of World -0.0009 0.0062 0.0040 0.0141-0.0011 0.0001 0.0046 World 0.0022 0.0095 0.0080 0.0153 0.0033 0.0041 0.0083 vii Annex Table 7: Impact of Capital Increses in India (percentage changes of real GDP) AGR MFG CNS T_T OSP PUB Unspecified Japan -0.0053 0.0064 0.0032 0.0138 0.0004 0.0016 0.0037 China -0.0056 0.0077 0.0040 0.0176 0.0004 0.0019 0.0046 Indonesia -0.0062 0.0076 0.0038 0.0166 0.0005 0.0019 0.0045 Malaysia -0.0091 0.0100 0.0050 0.0211 0.0008 0.0031 0.0059 the Phillipines -0.0058 0.0083 0.0042 0.0178 0.0006 0.0019 0.0049 Thailand -0.0089 0.0109 0.0053 0.0229 0.0007 0.0027 0.0063 Viet Nam -0.0043 0.0050 0.0024 0.0110 0.0003 0.0014 0.0029 India 0.3061 0.3622 0.3491 0.3245 0.3383 0.3494 0.3561 South Asia 0.0007 0.0043 0.0027 0.0134 0.0000 0.0010 0.0031 Asian NIEs -0.0058 0.0067 0.0036 0.0148 0.0005 0.0019 0.0040 Oceania -0.0050 0.0063 0.0031 0.0134 0.0004 0.0015 0.0037 USA -0.0045 0.0056 0.0027 0.0118 0.0004 0.0014 0.0032 Canada -0.0050 0.0066 0.0032 0.0141 0.0004 0.0016 0.0038 Latin America -0.0072 0.0086 0.0043 0.0184 0.0006 0.0022 0.0050 Western Europe -0.0037 0.0050 0.0025 0.0109 0.0003 0.0012 0.0030 Rest of World -0.0063 0.0078 0.0038 0.0162 0.0006 0.0019 0.0045 World -0.0012 0.0102 0.0071 0.0167 0.0043 0.0056 0.0077 viii