FOR RELEASE AUGUST 16, 2018

Similar documents
FOR RELEASE SEPTEMBER 13, 2018

FOR RELEASE October 18, 2018

the Poor and the Middle Class

BY Aaron Smith FOR RELEASE JUNE 28, 2018 FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:

BY Galen Stocking and Nami Sumida

FOR RELEASE October 1, 2018

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, October, 2016, Trump, Clinton supporters differ on how media should cover controversial statements

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, May, 2017, Partisan Identification Is Sticky, but About 10% Switched Parties Over the Past Year

FOR RELEASE November 29, 2018

PEW RESEARCH CENTER. FOR RELEASE January 16, 2019 FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:

Republicans views of FBI have grown more negative in past year

PEW RESEARCH CENTER. FOR RELEASE December 17, 2018 FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:

pewwww.pewresearch.org

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, March, 2017, Large Majorities See Checks and Balances, Right to Protest as Essential for Democracy

Growing share of public says there is too little focus on race issues

FOR RELEASE NOVEMBER 07, 2017

Most are skeptical Trump will act to block future Russian meddling

FOR RELEASE AUGUST 4, 2017

BY Amy Mitchell FOR RELEASE DECEMBER 3, 2018 FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, August, 2016, On Immigration Policy, Partisan Differences but Also Some Common Ground

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, May, 2017, Public Trust in Government Remains Near Historic Lows as Partisan Attitudes Shift

FOR RELEASE MAY 10, 2018

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, February, 2017, In Trump Era, What Partisans Want From Their Congressional Leaders

FOR RELEASE DECEMBER 14, 2017

FOR RELEASE October 15, 2018

FOR RELEASE July 17, 2018

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE AUGUST 26, 2016 FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, July, 2016, In Clinton s March to Nomination, Many Democrats Changed Their Minds

FOR RELEASE MAY 3, 2018

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, November, 2016, A Divided and Pessimistic Electorate

BY Cary Funk and Lee Rainie

FOR RELEASE DECEMBER 07, 2017

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, May, 2015, Free Trade Agreements Seen as Good for U.S., But Concerns Persist

BY Elisa Shearer and Katerina Eva Matsa

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, October, 2015, On Immigration Policy, Wider Partisan Divide Over Border Fence Than Path to Legal Status

PEW RESEARCH CENTER FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, June, 2015, Broad Public Support for Legal Status for Undocumented Immigrants

FOR RELEASE JANUARY 18, 2018

BY Michael Barthel and Amy Mitchell

FOR RELEASE OCT. 2, 2018

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, May, 2015, Negative Views of New Congress Cross Party Lines

GOP Seen as Principled, But Out of Touch and Too Extreme

Public Remains Opposed to Arming Syrian Rebels

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, October, 2016, In Presidential Contest, Voters Say Basic Facts, Not Just Policies, Are in Dispute

Most opponents reject hearings no matter whom Obama nominates

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, May, 2015, Republicans Early Views of GOP Field More Positive than in 2012, 2008 Campaigns

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD. FOR RELEASE September 12, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, September, 2015, Majority Says Any Budget Deal Must Include Planned Parenthood Funding

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, February, 2015, Democrats Have More Positive Image, But GOP Runs Even or Ahead on Key Issues

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, May, 2015, Public Continues to Back U.S. Drone Attacks

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, February, 2015, Growing Support for Campaign Against ISIS - and Possible Use of U.S.

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, July, 2015, Iran Nuclear Agreement Meets With Public Skepticism

Public Views of Congress Recover Slightly REPUBLICANS LESS POSITIVE TOWARD SUPREME COURT

Obama Maintains Approval Advantage, But GOP Runs Even on Key Issues

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, July, 2015, Negative Views of Supreme Court at Record High, Driven by Republican Dissatisfaction

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE AUGUST 25, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:

Continued Support for U.S. Drone Strikes

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, July, 2014, Most Think the U.S. Has No Responsibility to Act in Iraq

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, March, 2015, More Approve Than Disapprove of Iran Talks, But Most Think Iranians Are Not Serious

Supreme Court s Favorability Edges Below 50%

Republicans Are Losing Ground on the Deficit, But Obama s Not Gaining

FOR RELEASE MARCH 20, 2018

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, September 2014, Growing Public Concern about Rise of Islamic Extremism At Home and Abroad

BY Jeffrey Gottfried, Galen Stocking and Elizabeth Grieco

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, February 2014, Public Divided over Increased Deportation of Unauthorized Immigrants

Borders First a Dividing Line in Immigration Debate

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, March 2014, Concerns about Russia Rise, But Just a Quarter Call Moscow an Adversary

For Voters It s Still the Economy

FOR RELEASE APRIL 26, 2018

Most Say Immigration Policy Needs Big Changes

Any Court Health Care Decision Unlikely to Please

Public Remains Supportive of Israel, Wary of Iran

Record Number Favors Removing U.S. Troops from Afghanistan

FAVORABLE RATINGS OF LABOR UNIONS FALL SHARPLY

Obama Viewed as Fiscal Cliff Victor; Legislation Gets Lukewarm Reception

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, January, 2015, Public s Policy Priorities Reflect Changing Conditions At Home and Abroad

FOR RELEASE AUGUST 9, 2018

GOP leads on economy, Democrats on health care, immigration

Partisans Dug in on Budget, Health Care Impasse

Little Support for U.S. Intervention in Syrian Conflict

Well Known: Clinton and Gadhafi Little Known: Who Controls Congress

Opposition to Syrian Airstrikes Surges

Wide Partisan Gaps in U.S. Over How Far the Country Has Come on Gender Equality

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, September, 2016, The Parties on the Eve of the 2016 Election: Two Coalitions, Moving Further Apart

State Governments Viewed Favorably as Federal Rating Hits New Low

Wide Partisan Gaps in U.S. Over How Far the Country Has Come on Gender Equality

Energy Concerns Fall, Deficit Concerns Rise PUBLIC S PRIORITIES FOR 2010: ECONOMY, JOBS, TERRORISM

BY Amy Mitchell, Tom Rosenstiel and Leah Christian

Supreme Court Approval Rating Drops to 25-Year Low

But Most See Possible Taliban Takeover as Major Threat PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR AFGHAN MISSION SLIPS

On Eve of Foreign Debate, Growing Pessimism about Arab Spring Aftermath

Despite Years of Terror Scares, Public s Concerns Remain Fairly Steady

Pew Research News IQ Quiz What the Public Knows about the Political Parties

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, March 2014, Most Say U.S. Should Not Get Too Involved in Ukraine Situation

FOR RELEASE AUGUST 29, 2017

No Change in Views of Torture, Warrantless Wiretaps OBAMA FACES FAMILIAR DIVISIONS OVER ANTI-TERROR POLICIES

Partisan Interest, Reactions to IRS and AP Controversies

Continued Support for Keystone XL Pipeline

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE OCTOBER 29, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:

FOR RELEASE NOVEMBER 8, 2013 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:

Transcription:

FOR RELEASE AUGUST 16, 2018 FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES: Carroll Doherty, Director of Political Research Jocelyn Kiley, Associate Director, Research Bridget Johnson, Communications Manager 202.419.4372 RECOMMENDED CITATION Pew Research Center, August, 2018, As Midterms Near, Democrats Are More Politically Active Than Republicans

About Pew Research Center Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. It does not take policy positions. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, content analysis and other data-driven social science research. The Center studies U.S. politics and policy; journalism and media; internet, science and technology; religion and public life; Hispanic trends; global attitudes and trends; and U.S. social and demographic trends. All of the Center s reports are available at. Pew Research Center is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts, its primary funder. Pew Research Center 2018

Across a range of political activities from attending political rallies to donating to campaigns voters who back Democratic candidates for Congress are reporting higher levels of political activity than GOP voters. But both sets of voters share a view that the upcoming election is important: About three-quarters in both parties say it really matters which party wins control of Congress in this fall s election. The new national survey by Pew Research Center, conducted July 31-August 12 among 4,581 adults, including 4,000 registered voters, finds that 14% of voters say they have attended a political rally, protest or campaign event in the past year. Democrats more likely than Republicans to engage in politics; no significant gaps in online activism % of registered voters who have in the last year Among registered voters who favor the Democratic candidate in their House district, 22% say they have attended a political event, compared with just 8% of those who support the Republican candidate. Note: Republicans voters are those who favor the Republican candidate in their House district; Democratic voters are those who favor the Democratic candidate. Source: Survey of U.S. adults conducted July 31-Aug. 12, 2018.

2 The differences are more modest in the shares saying they have donated to political campaigns; still, 23% of Democratic voters say they have done this in the past year compared with 18% of Republican voters. Democratic voters are also more likely to have contacted an elected official (36% vs. 28%) and volunteered for a campaign (9% vs. 5%). Among Democratic voters, large educational gap in political activism % of registered voters who have participated in at least one activity in last year (attended event, volunteered for campaign, contacted elected official, contributed money to a candidate/group) However, Republican voters are slightly more likely than Democrats to say they have expressed support for a candidate on social media (39% vs. 35%), while Democrats are a bit more likely to have expressed opposition to a candidate on social media (35% vs. 31%). Note: Republicans voters are those who favor the Republican candidate in their district; Democratic voters are those who favor the Democratic candidate. Whites include only those who are not Hispanic; Nonwhites include all Hispanics. Source: Survey of U.S. adults conducted July 31-Aug. 12, 2018. Overall half of Democratic voters (50%) report having participated in at least one of four campaign-related activities asked about on this survey (excluding social media activities). This compares with 40% of Republican voters. In both parties, especially among Democrats, there are educational differences in reported political activism. Nearly two-thirds of college graduates who support the Democratic candidate in their House district say they have engaged in at least one of the four political activities, compared with 39% of Democratic voters who have not completed college. Among Republicans, the educational differences are less pronounced (45% of college-plus Republican voters, compared with 37% of non-college Republicans). The survey finds no significant gender differences in political activism among voters in either party. About half of men (51%) and women (49%) Democratic voters say they have engaged in one

3 of the four activities, compared with roughly four-in-ten men (40%) and women (39%) Republican voters. Given a four-point scale on the importance of partisan control of Congress, a majority of registered voters (68%) place themselves at the top of the scale, meaning it really matters to them which party gains control. This opinion has changed little since February, when 65% said which party gained control of Congress really mattered. Fewer than half of younger GOP voters say control of Congress really matters % of voters who say it really matters which party wins control of Congress Large majorities of voters who support a Democratic candidate (78%) or a Republican candidate (75%) say partisan control of Congress really matters; among those who do not express a preference for a major party candidate or say they are unsure, far fewer (23%) say it really matters. While the overall partisan gap is modest, it varies substantially within subgroups of voters. For example, nearly seven-in-ten Democratic voters who are younger than 35 (69%) say it really matters which party wins control of Congress, compared with less than half of younger Republican voters (44%). By comparison, there is no partisan gap in these views among voters 50 and older. Notes: Republicans voters are those who favor the Republican candidate in their House district; Democratic voters are those who favor the Democratic candidate. Whites include only those who are not Hispanic; Nonwhites include all Hispanics. Source: Survey of U.S. adults conducted July 31-Aug. 12, 2018.

4 Older voters are more likely than younger voters to report participating in many forms of political engagement. The divide is starkest in political contributions: In both parties, those 65 and older are about three times as likely as those under 35 to have made a financial contribution to a candidate or groups working to elect a candidate. In contrast to most other forms of participation, younger voters both Republicans and Democrats are more likely than older voters to say they have attended a political rally, protest or campaign event in the past year. Over four political engagement measures, the partisan gap between supporters of Democratic candidates and supporters of Republican candidates Contacted any elected official generally holds up across different age groups. Political activism more common among older than younger voters, except in attendance at events % of registered voters who have in the last year 33 15 38 33 28 Dem voters 30 Rep voters 41 32 Ages 18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Attended a political rally, protest or campaign event 26 12 24 8 21 19 6 7 18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Contributed money to a candidate running for public office or to a group working to elect a candidate 35 13 8 22 11 24 18 26 18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Worked or volunteered for a political party, candidate or campaign 9 7 12 12 7 6 3 5 18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Note: Republicans voters are those who favor the Republican candidate in their House district; Democratic voters are those who favor the Democratic candidate. Source: Survey of U.S. adults conducted July 31-Aug. 12, 2018.

5 Overall, fairly comparable shares of Republican and Democratic voters say they have used social media to publicly express support or opposition for a candidate, elected official or political campaign on Facebook, Twitter or other social media. Non-college GOP voters are more politically active on social media than Republican college graduates % of voters who have in the last year However, there are substantial educational differences within parties and the patterns differ among Republican and Democratic voters. Note: Half of respondents were randomly assigned to receive the support item and the other half received the opposition item. Source: Survey of U.S. adults conducted July 31-Aug. 12, 2018. Supporters of Republican candidates with a college degree are substantially less likely than those without a college degree to say they have used social media to express support or opposition for candidates, elected officials, or political campaigns on social media. The opposite pattern holds among Democratic supporters. Democrats with a college degree are significantly more likely than those without a four-year degree to say they have expressed support or opposition to political figures on social media.

6 Acknowledgements This report is a collaborative effort based on the input and analysis of the following individuals: Research team Carroll Doherty, Director, Political Research Jocelyn Kiley, Associate Director, Political Research Alec Tyson, Senior Researcher Bradley Jones, Research Associate Baxter Oliphant, Research Associate Hannah Hartig, Research Analyst Amina Dunn, Research Assistant John LaLoggia, Research Assistant Communications and editorial Bridget Johnson, Communications Manager Graphic design and web publishing Alissa Scheller, Information Graphics Designer

7 Methodology The American Trends Panel (ATP), created by the Pew Research Center, is a nationally representative panel of randomly selected U.S. adults recruited from landline and cell phone random digit dial surveys. Panelists participate via monthly self-administered Web surveys. Panelists who do not have internet access are provided with a tablet and wireless internet connection. The panel is being managed by GfK. Data in this report are drawn from the panel wave conducted July 30-August 12, 2018, among 4,581 respondents. The margin of sampling error for the full sample of 4,581 respondents is plus or minus 2.4 percentage points. Members of the American Trends Panel were recruited from several large, national landline and cellphone random digit dial (RDD) surveys conducted in English and Spanish. At the end of each survey, respondents were invited to join the panel. The first group of panelists was recruited from the 2014 Political Polarization and Typology Survey, conducted January 23 to March 16, 2014. Of the 10,013 adults interviewed, 9,809 were invited to take part in the panel and a total of 5,338 agreed to participate. 1 The second group of panelists was recruited from the 2015 Pew Research Center Survey on Government, conducted August 27 to October 4, 2015. Of the 6,004 adults interviewed, all were invited to join the panel, and 2,976 agreed to participate. 2 The third group of panelists was recruited from a survey conducted April 25 to June 4, 2017. Of the 5,012 adults interviewed in the survey or pretest, 3,905 were invited to take part in the panel and a total of 1,628 agreed to participate. 3 The ATP data were weighted in a multi-step process that begins with a base weight incorporating the respondents original survey selection probability and the fact that in 2014 some panelists were subsampled for invitation to the panel. Next, an adjustment was made for the fact that the propensity to join the panel and remain an active panelist varied across different groups in the sample. The final step in the weighting uses an iterative technique that aligns the sample to population benchmarks on a number of dimensions. Gender, age, education, race, Hispanic origin and region parameters come from the U.S. Census Bureau s 2016 American Community Survey. The county-level population density parameter (deciles) comes from the 2010 U.S. decennial 1 When data collection for the 2014 Political Polarization and Typology Survey began, non-internet users were subsampled at a rate of 25%, but a decision was made shortly thereafter to invite all non-internet users to join. In total, 83% of non-internet users were invited to join the panel. 2 Respondents to the 2014 Political Polarization and Typology Survey who indicated that they are internet users but refused to provide an email address were initially permitted to participate in the American Trends Panel by mail, but were no longer permitted to join the panel after February 6, 2014. Internet users from the 2015 Pew Research Center Survey on Government who refused to provide an email address were not permitted to join the panel. 3 White, non-hispanic college graduates were subsampled at a rate of 50%.

8 census. The telephone service benchmark comes from the July-December 2016 National Health Interview Survey and is projected to 2017. The volunteerism benchmark comes from the 2015 Current Population Survey Volunteer Supplement. The party affiliation benchmark is the average of the three most recent Pew Research Center general public telephone surveys. The internet access benchmark comes from the 2017 ATP Panel Refresh Survey. Respondents who did not previously have internet access are treated as not having internet access for weighting purposes. Sampling errors and statistical tests of significance take into account the effect of weighting. Interviews are conducted in both English and Spanish, but the Hispanic sample in the American Trends Panel is predominantly native born and English speaking. The following table shows the unweighted sample sizes and the error attributable to sampling that would be expected at the 95% level of confidence for different groups in the survey: Survey conducted July 31-August 12, 2018 Unweighted Group sample size Plus or minus All registered voters 4,000 2.6 percentage points Half form 1,976 (min.) 3.6 percentage points Republican voters 1,530 4.1 percentage points Half form 753 (min.) 5.9 percentage points Democratic voters 2,032 3.6 percentage points Half form 1,008 (min.) 5.1 percentage points Sample sizes and sampling errors for other subgroups are available upon request. In addition to sampling error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of opinion polls. The July 2018 wave had a response rate of 84% (4,581 responses among 5,475 individuals in the panel). Taking account of the combined, weighted response rate for the recruitment surveys (10.1%) and attrition from panel members who were removed at their request or for inactivity, the cumulative response rate for the wave is 2.4%. 4 4 Approximately once per year, panelists who have not participated in multiple consecutive waves are removed from the panel. These cases are counted in the denominator of cumulative response rates.

9 Pew Research Center is a nonprofit, tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization and a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts, its primary funder. Pew Research Center, 2018

10 2018 S AMERICAN TRENDS PANEL WAVE 37 JULY FINAL TOPLINE JULY 30 AUGUST 12, 2018 TOTAL N=4,581 ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS HELD FOR FUTURE RELEASE ASK ALL: MATTERSCONG Thinking about how you feel about the 2018 congressional election, where would you place yourself on the following scale? [FLIP THE LABELS FOR HALF OF RESPONDENTS LEAVING THE SCALE ALWAYS 1 4] Jul 30- Aug 12 2018 Jan 29- Feb 13 2018 62 1 = Really matters which party wins control of Congress 57 17 2 19 10 3 10 10 4 = Doesn t really matter which party wins control of Congress 12 * No answer 1 DO NOT ASK IF RSTATE=11 DC, ELSE ASK ALL [N=4,566]: CONG If the elections for the U.S. House of Representatives were being held TODAY, would you vote for [RANDOMIZE ORDER OF RESPONSE OPTIONS 1 AND 2] ASK IF NOT SURE (CONG=4) OR NO RESPONSE TO CONG (CONG=99) DO NOT ASK IF RSTATE=11 DC: CONGA As of TODAY, do you LEAN more to [RANDOMIZE ORDER OF RESPONSE OPTIONS 1 AND 2 IN THE SAME ORDER AS CONG] Jul 30- Aug 12 2018 39 46 BASED ON REGISTERED VOTERS [N=3,986] Jan 29- Feb 13 2018 Oct 3-27 2014 Sep 15- Oct 3 2014 May 30- Jun 30 2014 Rep/Lean Rep candidate in your district 38 39 42 38 Dem/Lean Dem candidate in your district 47 43 47 42 Another/Lean to another candidate 5 4 5 5 5 10 Not sure 10 12 6 14 * No answer * * * * ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS HELD FOR FUTURE RELEASE

11 ASK ALL: CIVIC_ENG_ACTYR Here s a list of activities some people do and others do not. Please indicate if you have done each of the following activities in the past year. [RANDOMIZE] Yes, in the past year No, not in the past year No answer a. Attended a political rally, protest or campaign event Jul 30-Aug 12, 2018 13 86 1 b. Worked or volunteered for a political party, candidate or campaign Jul 30-Aug 12, 2018 7 92 1 c. Contacted any elected official Jul 30-Aug 12, 2018 27 72 1 d. Contributed money to a candidate running for public office or to a group working to elect a candidate Jul 30-Aug 12, 2018 16 83 1 e. Attended government meetings in your community, such as city or town council meetings Jul 30-Aug 12, 2018 14 85 1 ASK IF FORM 1 or 2 [N=2,269] f.f12. Publicly expressed your support for a candidate, elected official or political campaign on Facebook, Twitter or other social media Jul 30-Aug 12, 2018 30 70 1 ASK IF FORM 3 or 4 [N=2,312] g.f34. Publicly expressed your opposition to a candidate, elected official or political campaign on Facebook, Twitter or other social media Jul 30-Aug 12, 2018 28 70 1 See here for trend on previous question about civic engagement. ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS HELD FOR FUTURE RELEASE