The Protection of Foreigners and Investments Abroad Diplomatic Protection of Natural and Legal Persons

Similar documents
2016 FDI MOOT Africa Regional Rounds SKELETAL BRIEF FOR CLAIMANT

Commission, 2006, Vol II, Pt II, 25, 26.

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [on the report of the Sixth Committee (A/62/451)] 62/67. Diplomatic protection

WEEK 9- INTERACTION WITH NATIONAL COURTS

Communication from Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Reference: G/SO 218/2

MEMORANDUM FOR CLAIMANT 9 AUGUST 2013

IS NEER FAR FROM FAIR AND EQUITABLE? Remarks of Judge Stephen M. Schwebel. International Arbitration Club, London. 5 May 2011

STATE RESPONSIBILITY MR. SANTIAGO VILLALPANDO. Santiago, Chile 24 April 19 May 2017

ADF GROUP INC. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SECOND SUBMISSION OF CANADA PURSUANT TO NAFTA ARTICLE 1128

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

Report on Multiple Nationality 1

Chapter Ten: Initial Provisions Comparative Study Table of Contents

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF ARBITRATION. CASE No /AC

ARBITRATION PURSUANT TO THE RULES OF ARBITRATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ICC ARBITRATION NO /AC PETER EXPLOSIVE (CLAIMANT) Vs.

CHAPTER 9 INVESTMENT. Section A

State of Necessity: Effect on Compensation. Sergey Ripinsky 1 15 October 2007

The Government of the Republic of Colombia and the Government of ---- hereinafter referred to as the "Contracting Parties";

State responsibility and State liability in international law. Sigmar Stadlmeier

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [on the report of the Sixth Committee (A/56/589 and Corr.1)]

CHAPTER 9 INVESTMENT. Section A: Investment

CASES. Cambridge University Press ICSID Reports, Volume 13 Edited by Karen Lee Excerpt More information

Commercial Arbitration 2017

Enforcement & Dispute Resolution Outline. Cecilia M. Bailliet

CHAPTER EIGHT INVESTMENT. Section A Investment. 1. This Chapter shall apply to measures adopted or maintained by a Party relating to:

RULES FOR EXPEDITED ARBITRATIONS

Case concerning Avena and other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. United States of America) Summary of the Judgment of 31 March 2004

INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF ARBITRATION. CASE No /AC

STATE RESPONSIBILITY - A STUDY WITH RESPECT TO TREATMENT OF ALIENS

Widely Recognised Human Rights and Freedoms

The rights of non-citizens. Joint Statement addressed to the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination

European Convention on Nationality 1. (ETS No. 166) Explanatory Report. I. Introduction. a. Historical background

Opinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention at its sixtieth session, 2 6 May 2011

Council of the European Union Brussels, 26 February 2015 (OR. en)

Authority and Responsibility of States

Lund University Faculty of Law. From the SelectedWorks of Christoffer Wong. Christoffer Wong. February 8, 2011

Talking Disputes Philip Morris v. Uruguay

Vorlesung / Course Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung Introduction to Comparative Law

Box 16050, Stockholm, Sweden Phone: ,

Marvin Roy Feldman Karpa. United Mexican States. (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/99/1) Interim Decision on. Preliminary Jurisdictional Issues

Agreement for. the Promotion and Protection of Investment. between the Republic of Austria. and. the Federal Republic of Nigeria

Comments and observations received from Governments... 34

The Rights of Non-Citizens

INTRA-E.U. BIT ARBITRATIONS DECLARED INCOMPATIBLE WITH EU LAW JUDGMENT RENDERED IN C-284/16 - SLOWAKISCHE REPUBLIK V ACHMEA BV.

Responsibility of international organizations. Statement of the Chairman of the Drafting Committee Mr. Pedro Comissário Alfonso.

Box 16050, Stockholm, Sweden Phone: ,

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

Advance Unedited Version

PREAMBLE The UN UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

SKELETON BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT

Award Name and Date: Kompozit LLC v. Republic of Moldova (SCC Arbitration EA 2016/095) Emergency Award on Interim Measures 14 June 2016

International investment law claims going up in smoke?

Nationality. Oliver Dörr

The wider legal framework on equality in Europe

A Matter of Interest: Diplomatic Protection and State Responsibility Erga Omnes

ARBITRATION INSTITUTE OF THE STOCKHOLM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

GUIDELINES ON STATELESSNESS NO.

Handout 5.1 Key provisions of international and regional instruments

CHAPTER 2 BILL OF RIGHTS

Explanatory Report to the European Convention on the Suppression of Terrorism

PROCEDURAL LIMITATIONS ON CAPITAL PUNISHMENT: THE CASE OF FOREIGN NATIONALS

ADJUDICATION: RAISING OBJECTIONS TO THE ADJUDICATOR S JURISDICTION OR BREACH OF SOP ACT AT THE EARLIEST POSSIBLE OPPORTUNITY

PROCES-VERBAL OF EXCHANGE OF INSTRUMENTS OF RATIFICATION

The Individual in the International Legal System: Continuity and Change in International Law

Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

- legal sources - - corpus iuris -

Contents. Table of Statutes. Table of Secondary Legislation. Table of Cases. Introducing Immigration Law. British Citizenship and the Right of Abode

Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF SWEDEN

SOUTH AFRICAN BILL OF RIGHTS CHAPTER 2 OF CONSTITUTION OF RSA NO SOUTH AFRICAN BILL OF RIGHTS

A Guide to Applying to the European Court of Human Rights when fair trial rights have been violated October 2012

Opinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention at its seventy-second, April 2015

AGREEMENT BETWEEN CANADA AND THE CZECH REPUBLIC FOR THE PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS

Niyanta Munyal & Awnish Maithani

Council of the European Union Brussels, 22 January 2016 (OR. en)

Article 6. [Exercise of jurisdiction] [Preconditions to the exercise of jurisdiction]

Concluding observations of the Human Rights Committee. Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 40 of the Covenant

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

The idea of an international rule of law

CED/C/NLD/1. International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.

PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES ACT

Principles for an Internationally Legally Binding Instrument on TNC and other Business Enterprises with respect to Human Rights

INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF ALL PERSONS FROM ENFORCED DISAPPEARANCE. Preamble

PEACEFUL DISPUTE RESOLUTION, ARBITRATION & INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS. Prof David K. Linnan USC LAW # 783 Unit Seventeen

TOPIC SEVEN (A): STATE RESPONSIBILITY

International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance

Arbitrary Detention and International Law. The Torkel Opsahl Memorial Lecture 2015 by Mads Andenæs

United Nations. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Declarations and Reservations [Excerpt] 1

United Nations Conference on the Representation of States in Their Relations with International Organizations

INVESTOR-STATE DISPUTES AND THE SINGAPORE COURTS ALVIN YEO, SC (CHAIRMAN & SENIOR PARTNER, WONGPARTNERSHIP LLP) & BRUNDA KARANAM INTRODUCTION

Migration Amendment (Unauthorised Maritime Arrivals and Other Measures) Bill 2012

Draft Articles on the Status of the Diplomatic Courier and the Diplomatic Bag Not Accompanied by Diplomatic Courier and Draft Optional Protocols 1989

THE IMPLICATIONS FOR BUSINESSES OF THEIR FAILURE TO RESPECT HUMAN RIGHTS

THE APPEALS CHAMBER SITUATION IN DARFUR, SUDAN. IN THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTOR v. OMAR HASSAN AHMAD AL-BASHIR. Public Document

10th Anniversary Edition The Baker McKenzie International Arbitration Yearbook. Kyrgyzstan

COMPENSATION AWARDS IN INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW: TWO RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

LAW ON THE COURT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

Legal remedies and penalties in discrimination cases (Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC) Academy of European Law, Trier, 29 September 2014

SECTION A. Investment Protection. Article 9.1. Definitions

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Transcription:

The Protection of Foreigners and Investments Abroad Diplomatic Protection of Natural and Legal Persons

Structure 1. Introduction 1. Brief historical background 2. Contemporary system of protection 2. Primary Rules 3. Secondary Rules 2

Introduction: Sovereigns represent claims of individuals Vattel (1714-1767): whoever uses a citizen ill, indirectly offends the state, which is bound to protect this citizen Mavrommatis Palestine Concession Case (PCIJ 1924): by taking up the case of one of its subjects a State is in reality asserting its own rights A world dominated by countries whose citizens invested heavily abroad Special courts and/or legal regimes for foreigners investors Heavily criticised by developing and, in particular, Latin American countries 3

Introduction: Contemporary System Contemporary System of Protection based on: a) Customary International Law b) Conventions c) Cases d) Draft Articles of the International Law Commission Þ2001 Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (ARSIWA) Þ2006 Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection (DAP) 4

Primary and Secondary Rules 1. Primary Rules: which substantive rights do foreign nationals and corporations possess? 2. Secondary Rules: how can foreign nationals and corporations enforce their rights? 5

Primary Rules Multiplicity of protective legal layers Þ Domestic Law: Swedish Aliens Act 2005 Þ EU Law: TFEU Þ ECHR Law: ECHR Þ Specific Conventions: ICCPR, Vienna Convention on Consular Relations Þ Investment Law 6

Domestic Law 2005 Aliens Act: Ch. 12, Sec. 7a: Aliens with a permanent right of residence may not be expelled unless there are exceptional circumstances 7

Domestic Law In the proceedings before the British Courts Julian Assange enjoyed the various protections of English Law 8

Domestic Law Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union: art. 21 and art. 45: guarantee free movement and protect against non-discrimination on grounds of nationality 9

EU Law The case against Julian Assange in the UK proceeds on the basis of and pursuant to a European Arrest Warrant a legal instrument based on an EU Framework Decision 10

European Convention of Human Rights European Convention of Human Rights: art. 5: protects against arbitrary detention 11

European Convention of Human Rights Alleged violations of Julian Assange s ECHR rights were invoked before the Swedish Supreme Court 12

Specific Human Rights Regimes 1951 Refugee Convention 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations 13

Specific Human Rights Regimes The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention ruled that Julian Assange is being detained arbitrarily 14

Recap: Primary Rules ÞDomestic Law ÞEU Law ÞECHR Law ÞSpecific Human Rights Regimes ÞInvestment Law 15

Primary Rules: Investments ÞSources: Þ General International Law Þ Bilateral Investment Treaties 16

Primary Rules: Investments General Principles Minimum Standard: which reference standard? Þ National Treatment Þ Accord aliens the same treatment as nationals Þ International Minimum Standard Þ Neer Claim 1926: The propriety of governmental acts should be put to the test of international standards. Þ NAFTA 1105(1): Each Party shall accord to investments of investors of another Party treatment in accordance with international law. 17

Primary Rules: Investments General Principles Which content of reference standard? Þ NAFTA 1105(1): fair and equitable treatment, full protection and security Þ Neer Claim 1926: only acts amounting to an outrage, bad faith, wilful neglect of duty or an insufficiency of governmental action 18

Primary Rules: Investments General Principles Specific claims: ÞDenial of justice ÞAzinian v. United Mexican States 1999 (NAFTA) Þ Expropriation Þ Metalclad Corporation v. United Mexican States 2000 (NAFTA) Þ Expropriation lawful if adequate compensation provided Þ Even if no compensation, might be lawful if expropriation for specific public purposes (police powers, national defence) 19

Primary Rules: Investments Bilateral Investment Treaty ÞBilateral Investment Treaties (BIT) primary means of protecting investors ÞExample: 2004 Sweden Kazakhstan BIT Level of protection (art. 3): no less favourable that that accorded to investments made by its own investors or by investors of any third State Expropriation (art. 4): No measures depriving an investor of an investment unless the following conditions are complied with - Public interests and due process of law - non-discriminatory - Compensation payable 20

Secondary Rules How can an individual/corporation enforce a violated right? Þ Depends on the source of the infringed right Þ Domestic Law: Domestic Courts Þ EU Law: Domestic Courts, EU Courts Þ ECHR: Domestic Courts, ECtHR Þ International Law: Domestic Courts, International Courts Þ General Principles Þ Investment Law: Domestic Courts, International Courts, Arbitration Panels 21

Secondary Rules: General Principles The Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection Art. 1 DAP: Diplomatic Protection consists of the invocation by a State, through diplomatic action or other means of peaceful settlement, of the responsibility of another State for an injury caused by an internationally wrongful act of that State to a natural or legal person that is a national of the former State 22

Secondary Rules: General Principles The Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Invocation by a State Diplomatic action or other means Responsibility of another State Injury Caused by Internationally Wrongful Act To a natural or legal person That is a national of the former State Plus: Exhaustion of Local Remedies 23

Secondary Rules: General Principles The Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection 1. Invocation by a State Þ This excludes the invocation by international organisations Reparation for Injuries Case 1949 (ICJ) 24

Secondary Rules: General Principles The Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection 2. Diplomatic action or other means of peaceful settlement ÞIncludes all lawful procedures including protest, request fo an inquiry, negotiations, mediation, arbitration, judicial dispute settlement ÞDoes not include use of force, requests for corrective action 25

Secondary Rules: General Principles The Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection 3. Of the Responsibility of Another State ÞThis means act in question must be attributable to a State in accordance with the ARSIWA 26

Secondary Rules: General Principles The Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection 4. Injury ÞState in question must be able to establish that one of its nationals sustained an injury 27

Secondary Rules: General Principles The Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection 5. An internationally wrongful act ÞThis refers to the definition of an internationally wrongful act of the ARSIWA art. 2: There is an internationally wrongful act of a State when conduct consisting of an act or an omission: a) is attributable to that State; and b) constitutes a breach of an international obligation of that State. 28

Secondary Rules: General Principles The Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection 6. To a natural or legal person Þ This means that diplomatic protection extends not only to natural people, but also corporations Þ Draft Articles in principle also apply to legal entities that are not corporations (cf. art. 13 DAP) such as NGOs or universities. 29

Secondary Rules: General Principles The Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection 7. National of the Former State Þ In principle States can only exercise diplomatic protection with respect to their own nationals Þ In principle States are free to decide on which basis they grant nationality 30

Secondary Rules: General Principles The Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection 7a. Nationality of Natural Persons (Ch. II, DAP) Þ Nationality may be based, for example, on birth descent, naturalisation: Þ Note Nottebohm 1955 (ICJ) now confined to its facts Þ LaGrand 2001 (ICJ) made no reference to genuine link Þ Special Issues Þ Multiple Nationalities: art. 6 DAP Þ Competing Nationalities: art. 7 DAP ÞRefugees/Stateless Persons: art. 8 DAP 31

Secondary Rules: General Principles The Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection 7b) Nationality of Legal Persons (Ch. III, DAP) ÞCorporation s nationality: State where incorporated, unless: Þ no substantial business activities in State of incorporation Þ seat of management elsewhere Þ financial control located in other State Þ Special Issues: Protection of Shareholders Þ only the State of incorporation can exercise diplomatic protection (art. 11 DAP). Exceptions: Þ the corporation ceased to exist, Þ the state of incorporation is itself to blame for a given injury, Þ direct injury to shareholders 32

Secondary Rules: General Principles The Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection Plus: Exhaustion of Local Remedies Þ Art. 14 DAP: A State may not present an international claim in respect of an injury to a national or other person before the injured person has exhausted all local remedies Þ Local remedies: legal remedies open to injured person before the judicial or administrative courts of the State alleged to be responsible for causing the injury (art. 14(2) DAP) 33

Secondary Rules: General Principles The Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection Reason for exhaustion of local remedies rule: Þ Individual claims better handled in domestic courts Þ Governments dislike having to deal with many diplomatic protection claims Þ Reasonable to submit to local system first 34

Secondary Rules: General Principles The Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection Exceptions to Local Remedies Rule (art. 15 DAP): Þ No reasonably available local remedies: are courts reasonably capably of providing relief? Þ Þ Þ Þ Þ Local courts have no jurisdiction Local courts lack independence Consistent line of precedent adverse to aliens Local courts lack competence Inadequate system of judicial protection Þ Undue delay Þ No reasonable connection between injured person and responsible State Þ Injured person precluded from local remedies Þ Requirement waived (=> BITs) 35

Secondary Rules: Special Rules - BITs Investment Disputes are normally governed by special investment regimes: Þ ICSID: International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes Þ UNCITRAL: United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Þ Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC) 36

Secondary Rules: Special Rules The Swedish-Kazakhstan BIT Investor-State Disputes (art. 8 BIT): Þ Negotiations Þ International Arbitration Þ ICSID Þ UNCITRAL ad hoc arbitration tribunal State-State Disputes (art. 9 BIT) Þ Ad hoc tribunal Þ Assisted if necessary by ICJ 37

Questions? 38