TRENDS AND PROSPECTS OF KOREAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: FROM AN INTELLECTUAL POINTS OF VIEW

Similar documents
America in the Global Economy

EXPORT-ORIENTED ECONOMY - A NEW MODEL OF DEVELOPMENT FOR THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

Mark Allen. The Financial Crisis and Emerging Europe: What Happened and What s Next? Senior IMF Resident Representative for Central and Eastern Europe

Since the Vietnam War ended in 1975, the

Miracle of Estonia Entrepreneurship and Competitiveness Policy in Estonia

6. Policy Recommendations on How to Strengthen Financial Cooperation in Asia Wang Tongsan

Building an ASEAN Economic Community in the heart of East Asia By Dr Surin Pitsuwan, Secretary-General of ASEAN,

AN ALTERNATIVE PERSPECTIVE

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 109 ( 2014 ) The East Asian Model of Economic Development and Developing Countries

Lecture II North Korean Economic Development: from 1950s to today

HOW ECONOMIES GROW AND DEVELOP Macroeconomics In Context (Goodwin, et al.)

A COMPARISON OF ARIZONA TO NATIONS OF COMPARABLE SIZE

"The European Union and its Expanding Economy"

Chapter 11. Trade Policy in Developing Countries

How to Generate Employment and Attract Investment

CHAPTER 12: The Problem of Global Inequality

Chapter 5: Internationalization & Industrialization

Chapter 10: Long-run Economic Growth: Sources and Policies

Assignment. "Economic Profile of Vietnam"

OECD Sponsored Conference: Mobilizing Investment for Development in the Middle East and North Africa Region February 11 12, 2004 Istanbul, Turkey

International Development and Aid

ECONOMIC GROWTH* Chapt er. Key Concepts

Strengthening Regional Cooperation in East Asia

The term developing countries does not have a precise definition, but it is a name given to many low and middle income countries.

Current Situation and Outlook of Asia and the Pacific

65. Broad access to productive jobs is essential for achieving the objective of inclusive PROMOTING EMPLOYMENT AND MANAGING MIGRATION

POLI 12D: International Relations Sections 1, 6

Governing Body 310th Session, Geneva, March 2011

ASEAN ECONOMIC BULLETIN January 2016

Inclusive growth and development founded on decent work for all

The Challenge of Inclusive Growth: Making Growth Work for the Poor

Pakistan s Economy: Opportunities and Challenges I have been asked to speak today on the subject of Opportunities and Challenges for Pakistan s

General Discussion: Cross-Border Macroeconomic Implications of Demographic Change

Luiz Augusto de CASTRO NEVES Ambassador of Brazil

AN ASIAN TIGER: KOREA S ECONOMIC MIRACLE Mini-Course Curriculum

Thai Economy at the Cross Roads : Opportunities and Challenges

An Overview of China s s Emergence and East Asian Trade Patterns

Development Strategy. for. Myanmar

Comparing the Economic Developments Between South Korea and China

Japan s growing Asia focus: Implications for Korea

HIGHLIGHTS. There is a clear trend in the OECD area towards. which is reflected in the economic and innovative performance of certain OECD countries.

Western Balkans Countries In Focus Of Global Economic Crisis

The present picture: Migrants in Europe

ASIAN CURRENCY CRISES IMPACT ON THAILAND, INDONESIA& SOUTH KOREA

Technology Transfer for Infrastructure Development in Nepal

Koreafrica : An Ideal Partnership for Synergy?

Chapter 10 Trade Policy in Developing Countries

Keys to a Sustainable Development Path

Chapter Organization. Introduction. Introduction. Import-Substituting Industrialization. Import-Substituting Industrialization

The economic crisis in the low income CIS: fiscal consequences and policy responses. Sudharshan Canagarajah World Bank June 2010

Is Economic Development Good for Gender Equality? Income Growth and Poverty

Global Scenarios until 2030: Implications for Europe and its Institutions

Anthony P. D Costa Chair and Professor of Contemporary Indian Studies Development Studies Programme, University of Melbourne, Melbourne

Speech at the Business Event: Investment, growth and job creation, official visit to Serbia, 30 January-1 February 2018

Current Situation and Outlook of Asia and the Pacific

China and India:Convergence and Divergence

Unified Industrial Development Strategy for the Arab States of the Gulf Cooperation Council (Revised Version)

12 TH JOINT COUNCIL MEETING UNDER THE US-SRI LANKA TRADE AND INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT

Hungary s Economic Performance Following EU Accession: Lessons for the new EU Members Bulgaria and Romania

ARMENIA WORKSHOPS ON SUPPORTING ASIA PACIFIC LLDCS AND BHUTAN IN MOBILIZING RESOURCES FOR THE SDGS

INCLUSIVE GROWTH AND POLICIES: THE ASIAN EXPERIENCE. Thangavel Palanivel Chief Economist for Asia-Pacific UNDP, New York

Online Consultation for the Preparation of the Tajikistan Systematic Country Diagnostic. Dushanbe, Tajikistan March 2017

The role of the private sector in generating new investments, employment and financing for development

The Impact of Decline in Oil Prices on the Middle Eastern Countries

Presentation. Bangladesh s Experience during the Crisis: Lessons Learnt and Challenges

Globalisation and Open Markets

Chapter 2: The U.S. Economy: A Global View

Southeast Asian Economic Outlook With Perspectives on China and India, 2013

CRS Report for Congress

HRST Development in China. Mu Rongping Institute of Policy and Management Chinese Academy of Sciences

GDP Per Capita. Constant 2000 US$

VENEZUELA: Oil, Inflation and Prospects for Long-Term Growth

UNDERSTANDING TRADE, DEVELOPMENT, AND POVERTY REDUCTION

Vietnam: The Political Economy of the Middle Income Trap

China Forum University of Nevada, Reno College of Education, COE 2030 Thursday, September 5, 7 p.m.

The Chinese Economy. Elliott Parker, Ph.D. Professor of Economics University of Nevada, Reno

Asia Business Forum Topic: South-East Asia between China and India

AsianBondsOnline WEEKLY DEBT HIGHLIGHTS

Remittances and the Macroeconomic Impact of the Global Economic Crisis in the Kyrgyz Republic and Tajikistan

Informal Summary Economic and Social Council High-Level Segment

Dollarization in Ecuador. Miguel F. Ricaurte. University of Minnesota. Spring, 2008

IS MYANMAR AN EMERGING ECONOMY? SUGGESTIONS FROM VIETNAM AND THAILAND

Economics Honors Exam 2009 Solutions: Macroeconomics, Questions 6-7

Harnessing Remittances and Diaspora Knowledge to Build Productive Capacities

Migrant remittances is a way for Bangladesh to march toward a developed country through socio - economic development

China s Reform and Opening-up

THAILAND SYSTEMATIC COUNTRY DIAGNOSTIC Public Engagement

GERMANY, JAPAN AND INTERNATIONAL PAYMENT IMBALANCES

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER ANNEX TO THE PROPOSAL FOR A COUNCIL DECISION

China s Response to the Global Slowdown: The Best Macro is Good Micro

China s Rise and Leaving the Middle- Income Trap in Latin America A New Structural Economics Approach

EU Turkey Relations: Time for contemplation? Time for reality check? Güven SAK Berlin, 4 July 2005

Push and Pull Factors for Japanese Manufacturing Companies Moving Production Overseas

A. Growing dissatisfaction with hyperglobalization

THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC CRISIS DEVELOPING ECONOMIES AND THE ROLE OF MULTILATERAL DEVELOPMENT BANKS

Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) Economic Ministers Meeting Chairman s Statement

Economic Development in South Korea. Young-Jun Cho Assistant Professor The Academy of Korean Studies

Inclusive global growth: a framework to think about the post-2015 agenda

LESSON 4 The Miracle on the Han: Economic Currents

12th Korea-India Dialogue (2013)

Transcription:

TRENDS AND PROSPECTS OF KOREAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: FROM AN INTELLECTUAL POINTS OF VIEW FANOWEDY SAMARA (Seoul, South Korea) Comment on fanowedy@gmail.com On this article, I will share you the key factors of Korean Economic development dynamics and its challenges. In order to elaborate these grand issues, I get an opportunity to discuss with Professor Innwon Park from Korea University. I hope you will enjoy it and for sure you will have better understanding about the Korean economic development success and the deriving wheels as well. Thank you very much for Staying with me. I think it will be better for you to have background information about the professor. Don t worry I will introduce you to him in a very short brief. Innwon Park is a Professor of International Economics in the Division of International Studies at Korea University. He received his B.A. and M.A. in Economics from Korea University and his Ph.D. in Economics from the University of Pennsylvania, U.S.A. And he worked as an Assistant Professor in the Department of Economics at the National University of Singapore from 1993-1998. He has published books and journal papers on international trade issues and regional economic cooperation in East Asia including "Best Practices of Regional Trade Agreement (Review of World Economics, 2011), Regional Trade Agreements in East Asia: Will They Be Sustainable? (Asian Economic Journal, 2009), and Proliferating Regional Trade Arrangements: Why and Whither? (The World Economy, 2008). Having a short introduction about the professor, let s see the trend and prospects of Korean Economic Development dynamics. Like many of Korean professors, he started his speech by tracing some historical trends of the Korean economy. He mentioned the 1961 military coup d état as a turning point for the Economy. During this reference time in Korean history, the per capita income of Koreans was not more than 92 US dollars. The Military regime then introduced its First Five Year Development Plan in 1962. During this time, Korea did not have accumulated capital and advanced technology as well. The only thing that the nation had was its labor force, professor said. As a result, this plan focused primarily on utilizing this human resource and the development efforts focused on labor intensive schemes. Thus, government promoted 1

light industries where their main focus was international trade, at least to neighboring countries. Agricultural industries were among the prime focuses of the then government. In 1965, Korea normalized its relationship with Japan. As a result, the nation received a lot of compensation money (for Korea was colonized by Japan from 1910 to 1945). And the Government of Korea effectively used that money to build large infrastructure facilities such as the building of Seoul- Pusan highway. This highway connected the two largest cities of South Korea at that time. That is, the government utilized this money to speed up its development efforts. The Korean Developmental state gained a lot of economic successes during the last ten years which enabled the nation to join the Newly Industrializing Economy in 1970-Korea became a member of the Newly Industrializing Economy. Consequently, the country changed its focus from lights labor intensive industries to heavy capital intensive industries. And hence, the Second Phase of Development Policy which focused on heavy and chemical industries launched in 1972. The shift in its focus was due to in the one hand it already created favorable condition to migrate from light to heavy industries; and on the other hand, members of the Newly Industrializing Economy were obliged to do so. In any case, Korea migrated to heavy industries and was successful likewise. Professor Innwon Park stressed that these development successes so far triggered issues of democratization, privatization and liberalization. These issues became the prime agendas of that time (late 1980s) for Koreas economy was a sort of developmental state economy where government plays the major roles in most of economic sectors. Consequently, the Fourth Phase of Development Policy which focused on Democratization, Privatization and liberalization launched in 1987. Moreover, Korea realized the importance of regional cooperation to ensure rapid and sustainable economic development. It underlined that cooperation and regional economic integration is the only way to maintain its development efforts. As a result, it created good regional cooperation with its neighboring and other south East Asian countries. This in turn helped Korea to further boost its economy. According to the professor, the main reason for the introduction of this Fourth Development Policy was because of the inefficiency and ineffectiveness of the government. As a result, participation of the private sector to the development efforts increased while the involvement of the government reduced. Korea kept its development pace and joined Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in 1995. Imagine, Korea one of the poorest countries in the world in 1961 became one of the strongest economies in 1995 just after only 34 years. Similarly, it joined the G-20 in 1999 just after four 2

years. Korea escaped from the middle-income trap where World Bank categorized the nation as highincome country in 2002. The GDP per capita income of Korea reached 20, 000 USD in 2007. Miraculous! Despite of the fact that the entire world experienced global financial crises in 2008, Korea resisted and continued its development pace though it was affected by the situation. Korean economy still keeps growing. In 2012 Korea become a member of the 20-50 Club. The 20-50 Club currently is a group of seven countries with a population of more than 50 million and their GDP Per Capita income exceeds 20, 000 US Dollars. They are Japan (1987), United States of America (1988) France and Italy (1990), Germany (1991), United Kingdom (1996) and the Republic of Korea (2012). Economically, these are the most powerful nations of the world today. Professor Innwon Park associated this miraculous success to a number of factors. He emphasized that stable macroeconomic management is at the heart of Korean economic success. Under this factor, he mentioned that Government s outward-looking economic policy played crucial role in ensuring and sustaining Korean Economic Growth. From the beginning, the government gave special attention to international market by formulating export-oriented economic growth. Moreover, market-driven economic system helped Korean economy to grow faster and faster. This in turn, according to the professor, enabled Korea to ensure stable and predictable business environment. Likewise saving culture of Koreans is among the prominent driving wheels of the economy. He emphasized that it is this culture that enabled both the Government and development ventures to invest on various development sectors. Without this culture, investment would be limited, the professor added. Government s effective family planning was also among these stable macroeconomic policies that fuel up the growth pace of Korean economy. Likewise, Korean Government paid special attention to Education. Education has been one of the most focus areas of government policies. Korea has been paying more attention to the accumulation of human Capital. There would not be successful economic development without creating literate society. And education is the centerpiece of advanced economy, professor pointed out. Thus, education is the second factor to the miraculous Korean economic development, according to him. The third wheel of Korean economic success is adequate accumulation of physical capital. He further emphasized that high domestic saving and investment is the central element here. And most importantly, the stable macroeconomic management also created favorable condition for foreign direct investment (FDI). Thus, FDI also played a vital role for Korean economic achievement, professor stressed. 3

Foreign Aid and Loan, particularly in the aftermath of the Korean War was very crucial to ensure rapid economic growth. But professor emphasized that foreign aid and loan per se could never be a guarantee for successful economy. He explained that there are countries that receive a lot of Foreign Aid and Loan but still fail to succeed. The rationale behind this aid and loan, according to the professor, is the commitment of Korean Government to effectively and efficiently utilize it. Thus, the opportunity of Foreign Aid and loan and the effective utilization by the government speed up Korean Economy. The existence of Stable and Development-oriented Government is the fourth factor. Government s support to targeted and selected industries plays a pivotal role to boost the economy. Moreover, low deposit rates and ceiling on borrowing rates helped investors to increase their profits and retained earnings. The policy of protection of domestic import substitute industries, particularly at the initial steps empowered domestic investors. And the government also subsidized declining industries in order to recover from failure. Public investment in applied research has been one of the most crucial factors for the success, professor pointed out. He explained that Korean researchers have been doing their best to help the economy. He further noted that helping Korea by conducting feasible research is at the heart of Korean intellectuals. Thus, Korean economy has been helping by up-to-date researches. Moreover, Government paid special attention to applied research, he added. The most important thing that professor Innwon Park stated is that the work ethics and discipline of Koreans. Even he glorified that Korean work value and ethics is the most remarkable secret of Korea Miraculous economic success. Most Korean work more than 10 hours a day and they compromise hard work with nothing. He noticed that even family members cannot complain for elapsing their private time. For your wonder, professor stated that Korean family members forced each other to work hard than passing their time together. Do you know why, this is their Core value-sometimes called Asian Value. Korea has been experiencing miraculous economic achievements. But the focus of Korean economy should be shifted from growth to distribution, professor argued. Korea is one of the biggest economies in the world. It is the 13 th largest economy. Thus, focus on economic growth which he called as quantity is a sort of ridiculous. The fair agenda, rather, should be the issue of economic democratization which he called it as quality. He further pointed out that we already achieved the growth targets. But we need to narrow the gap between the haves and the have nots -the rich and the poor. The country is the home of both the 4

poor and the rich and there is no rational reason to keep this gap. So, the prime agenda should be ensuring economic welfare for all Koreans. Thus, the current problem is economic inequality, not economic growth. Therefore, the agenda should be addressing the real problem. Otherwise Korean economy will no longer be fair. Without ensuring welfare or otherwise he called it economic democratization, it would be impossible to attain better quality of life, he focused. Professor also mentioned several challenges to the Korean economy. The uncertainty that is caused by the global turbulence is the prime challenge he noted. This in turn comprises of sovereign debt problem in Europe, fiscal deficit in US and Japan, territorial dispute in Asia (the territorial dispute between China and Japan on one hand and the territorial dispute between Japan and Korea on the other side), and appreciation of the Korean won which in turn triggers decreasing export demands and results in recession. The Korean inflation is also another bottleneck for the economy. The sky rocketing prices in raw materials, food and energy may become a hurdle to the economy. Furthermore, household debt and stagnant housing market, prolonged sluggish consumption and investment demand is another challenge. Business growth dominated by large firms and hollowing-out, deterioration of small and medium-sized enterprises and delayed restructuring, youth unemployment and aging population, increasing social conflicts (equality versus growth)-the issue of economic democratization- are the major challenges of Korean economy today. Though professor pointed out that Korean economy is facing several challenges, it still keeps growing even at the time of Global crisis. He predicted that nation s GDP growth rate for this year (2012) will be 2.5% which is, in fact, lower than that of last year (3.3%) 5