Protecting Residential Utility Customers: Summary of 2015 AARP Survey of Kansas Voters

Similar documents
Likely New Hampshire Primary Voters Attitudes Toward Social Security

2008Hispanic RegisteredVotersSurvey

Likely Iowa Caucus Voters Attitudes Toward Social Security

AARP Bulletin Survey on Midterm Elections

Cutting Benefits for Deficit Reduction: A Survey of Registered Voters Age 50+ in NY CD 25

UndecidedVotersinthe NovemberPresidential Election. anationalsurvey

New York Election Issues Survey: January 24, 2008

Colorado TABOR: A Survey of Colorado Likely Voters Age 18+ Data Collected by Alan Newman Research, Inc. Report Prepared by Joanne Binette

Women Voters Ages 50+ and the 2016 Election: Thoughts on Social Security and the Presidential Candidates.

AARP 2002 Election Survey: Maine Data Collected by ICR Report Prepared by Katherine Bridges

AARP 2002 Election Survey: South Dakota Data Collected by ICR Report Prepared by Anu Hyvarinen

AARP 2002 Election Survey: Florida Congressional District 5 Data Collected by ICR Report Prepared by Kathi Brown

AARP Maine Member Survey on the Health Care Reform Plan in the House of Representatives..

AARP Minnesota Member Survey on the Health Care Reform Plan in the House of Representatives..

AARP 2002 Election Survey: Missouri Data Collected by ICR Report Prepared by Christine Bechtel

AARP 2002 Election Survey: Florida Congressional District 24 Data Collected by ICR Report Prepared by Curt Davies

AARP Pre-First-Debate National Survey Miami, September 30, 2004

SouthCarolinaElection IssuesSurvey

New HampshireElection IssuesSurvey. Wave3. December13,2007

Medicare Prescription Drug Benefits: Results of a National Survey Data Collected by Market Facts Report Prepared by Jeffrey Love, Ph.D.

AARP Oklahoma Legislative Issues Survey: Identity Theft Report Prepared by Joanne Binette

Presented By: Brooks Kochvar. Greg Strimple. SC Primary Survey: October 18 19, 2011; 400N/4.90% Margin of Error

Presented By: Brooks Kochvar. Greg Strimple. IA Caucus Summary: October 17 20, 2011; 400N/4.90% Margin of Error

YG Network Congressional District Poll: December Topline Results

Global Warming and the 2008 Presidential Election

POLL DATA HIGHLIGHTS SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN REGISTERED DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS.

o Male 39/57 Female 47/52 o Republicans 8/91 Democrats 84/14 Independents 35/61

HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 9/24/2018 (UPDATE)

HEALTH CARE EXPERIENCES

FINAL RESULTS: National Voter Survey Total Sample Size: 2428, Margin of Error: ±2.0% Interview Dates: November 1-4, 2018

November 2017 Toplines

Inside the 2012 Latino Electorate

ASSIMILATION AND LANGUAGE

Erie County and the Trump Administration

September 2017 Toplines

Racial Inequities in the Washington, DC, Region

Proposed gas tax repeal backed five to four. Support tied to voter views about the state s high gas prices rather than the condition of its roads

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE OCTOBER 29, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:

WASHINGTON, D.C. CITYWIDE POLL 2010 Election for Mayor

HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 10/13/2017 (UPDATE)

Statewide General Benchmark August

REPORT TO PROPRIETARY RESULTS FROM THE 48 TH PAN ATLANTIC SMS GROUP. THE BENCHMARK OF MAINE PUBLIC OPINION Issued May, 2011

Attitudes toward Immigration: Iowa Republican Caucus-Goers

University of North Florida Public Opinion Research Lab


HISPANIC MEDIA SURVEY Topline - National

Elizabeth M. Grieco, Patricia de la Cruz, Rachel Cortes, and Luke Larsen Immigration Statistics Staff, Population Division U.S.

Gauging the Impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act

Race for Governor of Pennsylvania and the Use of Force Against ISIS

Two-to-one voter support for Marijuana Legalization (Prop. 64) and Gun Control (Prop. 63) initiatives.

Working-Class Latinos in Orlando More Motivated to Vote Because of Trump

Datamar Inc. Florida Statewide Survey Presidential General Election. October 31, 2008

April 29, NW 13 th Ave., #205 Portland, OR

Current Kansas Polling

Racial Inequities in Montgomery County

November 15-18, 2013 Open Government Survey

Approval, Favorability and State of the Economy

Tell us what you think. Provide feedback to help make American Community Survey data more useful for you.

Muhlenberg College/Morning Call 2018 Midterm Election Survey April Wave

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE AUGUST 26, 2016 FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:

Critical Insights on Maine TM Tracking Survey ~ Spring 2018 ~

University of North Florida Public Opinion Research Lab

PROTECTING THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES

NATIONAL: CLINTON LEAD SHRINKS While non-candidate Biden makes gains

University of Iowa Hawkeye Poll Topline Results Oct. 31, 2012 October 2012 poll of Iowa respondents

PUBLIC BACKS CLINTON ON GUN CONTROL

Florida Survey 2008 Presidential General Election

Topline & Methodology. The Washington Post/Kaiser Family Foundation Survey on Political Rallygoing and Activism

MARCH 2018 Brands Taking Sides In The Gun Debate

FOR RELEASE AUGUST 16, 2018

FINAL RESULTS 1. Before we get started, please let us know: what is your gender? [ROTATE] Female 56.5% Male 43.5% Other 0%

P R E S S R E L E A S E

NEWS RELEASE. Red State Nail-biter: McCain and Obama in 47% - 47 % Dead Heat Among Hoosier Voters

Minnesota Public Radio News and Humphrey Institute Poll. Dayton Starts with Edge in Democratic Primary and Fall Election

Bush 2004 Gains among Hispanics Strongest with Men, And in South and Northeast, Annenberg Data Show

Muhlenberg College/Morning Call. Pennsylvania 15 th Congressional District Registered Voter Survey

GENERATIONAL DIFFERENCES

Center for American Progress Action Fund Survey of the Florida Puerto Rican Electorate

ENVIRONMENTAL ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

Florida Latino Voters Survey Findings

Growing share of public says there is too little focus on race issues

Remittances and the Dominican Republic Survey of Recipients in the Dominican Republic Survey of Senders in the United States

Interview dates: September 6 8, 2013 Number of interviews: 1,007

National Latino Leader? The Job is Open

State of the Facts 2018

Montana Polling. Contact: Doug Kaplan,

Nevada Polling. Contact: Doug Kaplan,

Jim Justice Leads in Race for West Virginia Governor

Racial Inequities in Fairfax County

Tennessee Polling. Contact: Doug Kaplan,

U.S. Catholics split between intent to vote for Kerry and Bush.

Nevada Poll Results Tarkanian 39%, Heller 31% (31% undecided) 31% would renominate Heller (51% want someone else, 18% undecided)

PPIC Statewide Survey Methodology

Survey on the Death Penalty

POPULATION AND HOUSING ITEMS ON THE GENERAL CENSUS SCHEDULES Compiled by Grace York, Librarian Emerita, University of Michigan, August 2010

PRRI/The Atlantic 2016 Post- election White Working Class Survey Total = 1,162 (540 Landline, 622 Cell phone) November 9 20, 2016

Washington Office 1211 Connecticut Avenue NW Suite 305 Washington, DC T F

(Full methodological details appended at the end.) *= less than 0.5 percent

BOOKER V. RIVERA AND THE POWER OF CABLE NEWS OBAMA APPROVAL DOWN SLIGHTLY

Latinos Express Growing Confidence In Personal Finances, Nation s Direction

Transcription:

Protecting Residential Utility Customers: Summary of 2015 AARP Survey of Kansas Voters Report Prepared by Cassandra Burton July 21, 2015 Copyright 2015 AARP AARP Research 601 E Street NW Washington, DC 20049 www.aarp.org/research/ Reprinting with Permission

Protecting Residential Utility Customers: Summary of 2015 AARP Survey of Kansas Voters Voters do not feel elected officials are doing enough to lower utility bills or consider residents when rate increases are proposed. Kansas registered voters are concerned about the rising cost of electricity and natural gas. In fact, when asked, more than eight in ten registered voters 45-plus in Kansas report that an increase in their household utility bill would be a major (43%) or a minor (39%) problem for them. Most customers (84% electricity and 77% natural gas customers are also concerned about future increases. Many voters do not think elected officials are doing enough to lower utility costs and do not feel represented when utility rate increases are proposed. Are State Officials Doing Enough to Lower Utility Costs? 60% Natural gas (n=564) 64% Electricity (n=316) Do Customers Feel Represented When Rate Increases are Proposed? 62% 18% 1 27% Voters report that having a certain level of heating or cooling in their home is important because they or someone in their household has a medical condition. The level of heating or cooling in the home is sometimes for more than comfort, one in five voters report that they or someone in their household depends on a certain level of heating or cooling in the home because of a medical condition. Furthermore, more than one-quarter (28%) of voters also report that they have to make adjustments to pay for their electric or natural gas bill. Some adjustments have been by way of delaying or not paying a bill (12%), putting off paying the utility bill altogether (9%), or delaying or not purchasing medication that they need (7%). Does a Medical Condition Require the Home to be Heated or Cooled at a Certain Temperature? 79% 1% 20% Protecting Residential Utility Customers: Summary of 2015 AARP Survey of Kansas Voters Page 1

Kansas voters oppose proposals by the utility companies that would lead to increases in their utility bills. They support a thorough review process for surcharges and additional fees. Most (79%) voters age 45-plus oppose the utility companies efforts to increase the fixed monthly customer charge, which is charged to customers prior to using the gas or electric services of the utility company. Voters also oppose (88%) the proposal by utility companies allowing them to charge automatic rate increases for infrastructure and grid improvements before the state utility commission has completed a rate review. for Increasing the Fixed Monthly Customer Charge 9% for Automatic Rate Increase for Improvements Prior to a Rate Review 4% 79% 7% 88% 7% t sure t sure 2% More than one-half (54%) of Kansas voters support regulations to respond to flat sales, technology changes and environmental concerns. Most (61%) also support a thorough review process when utility companies want to add additional surcharges and fees to their utility bills for such things as special projects and environmental compliance. for Regulations to Respond to Sales, Technology and Environmental Concerns for Thorough Review Process Before Surcharges and Fees can be Charged 13% 4% 54% 17% 61% 29% 16% 6% Protecting Residential Utility Customers: Summary of 2015 AARP Survey of Kansas Voters Page 2

Westar Energy customers oppose the requested 7.9 percent rate to support environmental compliance. Kansas voters who are also Westar Energy customers oppose (5) a requested 7.9 percent rate increase for the cost of mandated state and federal environmental upgrades to comply with clean air regulations, improvements to the Wolf Creek Nuclear Generating Station, and investments to protect against power outages. for Rate Increase for Environmental Upgrades (n=326 Westar Energy Customers) 29% 5 10% Kansas voters support full and thorough financial audits of utility companies. More than four in five (8) registered voters age 45-plus in Kansas support state regulators or utility commissions conducting full and thorough financial audits of utility company earnings. Nearly all respondents (90%) also believe that when a utility company is found to have higher profits than authorized, the company should be required to reset customer rates. for Full and Thorough Financial Audits of Utility Companies Strongly/Somewhat support 8 Should Utility Companies be Required to Reset Rates if they Have Higher Profits Than Authorized? support nor oppose Strongly/Somewhat oppose 7% 90% t sure/ 4% Protecting Residential Utility Customers: Summary of 2015 AARP Survey of Kansas Voters Page 3

Respondent Demographics (n= 800 Kansas Registered Voters Age 45-plus) AGE WORK STATUS 45-49 13% Employed/Self Employed FT 40% 50-54 1 Employed/Self Employed PT 10% 55-64 32% Retired 39% 65+ 40% Unemployed/t working 10% GENDER HOMEOWNERSHIP Male 47% 11% Female 53% 89% MARITAL STATUS CHILDREN IN THE HH Married/Living w Partner 7 Child under 18 16% Sep/Div/Widowed 1 Child over 18 19% Never married 8% POLITICAL PARTY INCOME Democrat 26% Less than $30k 21% Republican 37% $30k - <$75k 37% Independent 2 $75k+ 24% Something else 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Protecting Residential Utility Customers: Summary of 2015 AARP Survey of Kansas Voters Page 4

Methodology The AARP 2015 Kansas Utility Survey was conducted as a telephone survey among registered voters age 45- plus in the state of Kansas. The survey collected the opinions of Kansas registered voters on issues related to utility bills, and the Citizens Utility Ratepayer Board. The survey was approximately 15 minutes in length. The interviews were conducted in English by Precision Opinion from June 24th to June 28th, 2015. The sample utilized a voter list. The margin of sampling error for the sample of 800 for Kansas is +/-3.. Questionnaire Development and Testing The questionnaire was developed by AARP staff. In order to improve the quality of the data, the questionnaire was pretested with a small number of respondents. The pretest interviews were monitored by Precision Opinion and conducted using experienced interviewers who could best judge the quality of the answers given and the degree to which respondents understood the questions. Further, Precision Opinion ran a simulated data set and conducted a full review of said data prior to commencing field work. Contact Procedures Precision Opinion asked to speak with the registered voter listed on file. If that person was unavailable, Precision Opinion asked to speak with another registered voter in the household aged 45-plus. Weighting The sample was weighted by age within gender to reflect the population of registered voters in the state of Kansas age 45-plus. Response Rate/Cooperation Rate/Refusal Rate The response rate for this study was measured using AAPOR s response rate 3 method. The cooperation rate was measured using AAPOR s cooperation rate 3 method. The refusal rate was measured using AAPOR s refusal rate 3 method. The table below contains these rates. Response Rate Cooperation Rate Refusal Rate 19% 88% 8% Source: AAPOR Outcome Rate Calculator Version 2.1 May 2003 Protecting Residential Utility Customers: Summary of 2015 AARP Survey of Kansas Voters Page 5

AARP is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, with a membership of nearly 38 million, that helps people turn their goals and dreams into real possibilities, strengthens communities and fights for the issues that matter most to families such as healthcare, employment and income security, retirement planning, affordable utilities and protection from financial abuse. We advocate for individuals in the marketplace by selecting products and services of high quality and value to carry the AARP name as well as help our members obtain discounts on a wide range of products, travel, and services. A trusted source for lifestyle tips, news and educational information, AARP produces AARP The Magazine, the world's largest circulation magazine; AARP Bulletin; www.aarp.org; AARP TV & Radio; AARP Books; and AARP en Español, a Spanish-language website addressing the interests and needs of Hispanics. AARP does not endorse candidates for public office or make contributions to political campaigns or candidates. The AARP Foundation is an affiliated charity that provides security, protection, and empowerment to older persons in need with support from thousands of volunteers, donors, and sponsors. AARP has staffed offices in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Learn more at www.aarp.org. State Research brings the right knowledge at the right time to our state and national partners in support of their efforts to improve the lives of people age 50+. State Research consultants provide strategic insights and actionable research to attain measurable state and national outcomes. The views expressed herein are for information, debate, and discussion, and do not necessarily represent official policies of AARP. AARP staff from the Kansas State Office, Campaigns, State Advocacy and Strategy Integration, and State Research contributed to the design, implementation and reporting of this study. Special thanks go to AARP staff, including Maren Turner, Mary Tritsch and Earnest Kutzley, AARP Kansas; Reshma Mehta, Campaigns; William Malcolm, John Coffman and Gerri Madrid-Davis, State Advocacy and Strategy Integration; and Kate Bridges, Terri Guengerich, Cheryl Barnes, and Rachelle Cummins, State Research. Please contact Cassandra Burton at 202-434-3547 for more information regarding this survey. The survey will be available at www.aarp.org/research. AARP Research For more information about this survey, please contact Cassandra Burton at: 202.434.3547 or ccantave@aarp.org Protecting Residential Utility Customers: Summary of 2015 AARP Survey of Kansas Voters Page 6