Karenni Refugee Camp 1 The judicial system and public opinion in Karenni Refugee Camp 1

Similar documents
Report on the problem and follow up to the 2013 fire in Karenni Refugee Camp 2

Community Based Organisations activities and situation within Karenni State from

Reduction of rations in Karenni Refugee Camp 1

Monthly Publication Of KSDC

Cultural Orientation Resource Center, Center for Applied Linguistics Overseas CO Program Highlight. Refugees from Burma, served by IRC RSC East Asia

KAREN REFUGEE COMMITTEE NEWSLETTER MONTHLY REPORT SEPTEMBER, 2010

Section 1 Basic principles

Facts on Human Rights Violations in Burma 1997

Annual Report 2013 ช ำระค าฝากส งเป นรายเด อน ใบอน ญาตพ เศษท 55/2555 ศฟ. บด นทรเดชา 10312

THAILAND: Strengthening Protection Capacity Project Matrix

(revised 1 st Nov 2007)

Withyou. Annual Report 2011: Our Past Year s Achievements. UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) Bangkok Office newsletter, 2012 Volume 4

KAREN REFUGEE COMMITTEE NEWSLETTER & MONTHLY REPORT

KAREN REFUGEE COMMITTEE MONTHLY REPORT

KAREN REFUGEE COMMITTEE MONTHLY REPORT

Karen Human Rights Group News Bulletin

KAREN REFUGEE COMMITTEE

7 th Grade English Summer Reading.

Analysis paper on the ceasefire process between the Karenni National Progressive Party (KNPP) and the Burmese government in the last six months

KAREN REFUGEE COMMITTEE MONTHLY REPORT

MYANMAR 1988 TO 1998 HAPPY 10TH ANNIVERSARY? ETHNIC NATIONALITIES

List of issues in relation to the initial report of Sierra Leone (CCPR/C/SLE/1)*

Criminal and Family Law ENG 04 FAMILY LAW FOR WOMEN IN ONTARIO. All Women. One Family Law. Know your Rights.

EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY

Refugee Experiences: Stories from Bhutan, Burma, Eritrea, Iraq, and Somalia

A Briefing on the Situation of Women in Cambodia May 2005

Victim Assistance in Burma (Myanmar) 1 : then and now

Domestic. Violence. In the State of Florida. Beware. Know Your Rights Get a Lawyer. Ruth Ann Hepler, Esq. & Michael P. Sullivan, Esq.

MOZAMBIQUE SUBMISSION TO THE UNITED NATIONS COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE

Oman. Authorities often have relied on provisions in the 2002 Telecommunications Act and 2011 Cybercrime Law to restrict freedom of expression online.

July 2001#2. Women of Strength. Teacher Mary Her life and work MESSAGE FROM SWAN

KAREN REFUGEE COMMITTEE. The Karen Refugee Committee, NEWSLETTER & MONTHLY REPORT

Learning with The Irrawaddy, No. 50 To accompany the December 2010 issue of The Irrawaddy magazine.

KAREN REFUGEE COMMITTEE NEWSLETTER MONTHLY REPORT MAY, 2010

RIGHTS ON THE MOVE Refugees, asylum-seekers, migrants and the internally displaced AI Index No: POL 33/001/2004

National Program for Action to Raise Effectiveness of the Protection of Human Rights and Freedoms in the Republic of Azerbaijan

The Report on the Process of Collecting the Voices of Karenni Women and Policy Brief for Peace Process

BURMA S REFUGEES: REPATRIATION FOR WHOM? By Roland Watson Dictator Watch November 12, Please share.

Gender BASED. Echoes From Syria. Guiding Principle 11:

Life in Exile: Burmese Refugees along the Thai-Burma Border

Holy Trinity Catholic School. Whistle Blowing Policy 2017 BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL WHISTLEBLOWING POLICY 2015 ADOPTED BY HOLY TRINITY CATHOLIC SCHOOL

Dooplaya Interview: Naw A---, May 2017

Annual General Meeting. 17 April 2016 STATISTICS 2015

OVERCROWDING OF PRISON POPULATIONS: THE NEPALESE PERSPECTIVE

Invisible In Thailand: Documenting the Need for International Protection for Burmese

KAREN REFUGEE COMMITTEE. The Karen Refugee Committee, NEWSLETTER & MONTHLY REPORT

Nyaunglebin Situation Update: Moo Township, June to November 2012

United Nations Study on Violence against Children. Response to the questionnaire received from the Government of the Republic of FINLAND

THAILAND Handicap International Federal Information Thailand Country Card EN. Elise Cartuyvels

Papua New Guinea. Women s and Girls Rights JANUARY 2017

CRM 321 Mod 5 Lecture Notes

KAREN REFUGEE COMMITTEE MONTHLY REPORT

Opinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention at its seventy-sixth session, August 2016

Aim and Objectives of Mon Relief and Development Committee

Section 810. This booklet explains the 810 process, what your rights are and how to get legal help.

SGTM 6C: GENDER AND PEACEKEEPING

Juvenile Justice System in Myanmar with a view on cross-border safeguards for children in contact with the law

A Narrative Report on a trip to Karenni refugee camp (2) / Mae Surin

for Northern Ireland

amnesty international

KAREN REFUGEE COMMITTEE MONTHLY REPORT

Version 03/2009. You also need the separate guidance documents listed below, which you should read before making your application:

Highlights IN THIS ISSUE: Community Fabric and Drake University Leadership. Drake University LEAD 100 students and

UNION OF MYANMAR long-term human rights crisis

North Korea JANUARY 2018

DKBA soldiers burn down huts, detain villagers and loot property in Thailand

4. What is private law? 3. What are laws? 1. Review all terms in chapters: 1, 2, 4, 5,6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, What is the purpose of Law?

Shared Housing Services

Georgian Police Code of Ethics

1. 4. Legal Framework for United Nations Peacekeeping. L e s s o n

U.S. Cultural Exchange Program 2008 Umpiem and Mae La Camps, Thailand. Presentation by Tonya Cook to the MN Department of Health May 28, 2008

IMMIGRATION RELIEF FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT SURVIVORS

Learning with The Irrawaddy, No. 39 To accompany the October 2009 issue of The Irrawaddy magazine.

Papun Situation Update: Bu Tho Township, July to October 2012

Civil Law is known as Private Law. Regulates disputes between individuals; between parties; and between individuals and parties.

KAREN REFUGEE COMMITTEE NEWSLETTER MONTHLY REPORT OCTOBER, 2010

Opinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention at its seventy-ninth session, August 2017

A/HRC/32/L.5/Rev.1. General Assembly. ORAL REVISION 1 July. United Nations

Annex 1 RECOMMENDATIONS

Report on the Human Rights Situation in Burma

Toungoo Situation Update: April to July 2011

Refugees in Malaysia A Forgotten Population

SUMMARY OF THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

MYANMAR/BANGLADESH ROHINGYAS - THE SEARCH FOR SAFETY

Number 28 of Criminal Justice (Victims of Crime) Act 2017

Whistleblowing & Serious Misconduct Policy

5. If I m in jail and my case is reduced from a felony to a misdemeanor, will I get out of jail?

Briefing Note to the UN Security Council Working Group on Children and Armed Conflict on the Situation of Child Soldiers in Myanmar.

refugee and immigrant FOSTER CARE

Chapter 15 Protection and redress for victims of crime and human rights violations

Information note for criminal justice practitioners on non-custodial measures for women offenders

KAREN REFUGEE COMMITTEE APRIL 1993

Nyaunglebin Situation Update: Kyauk Kyi Township, (November 2012 to January 2013)

KAREN REFUGEE COMMITTEE APRIL 1990

Degrading strip search procedures by law enforcement agencies

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT NO. 116 OF 1998

KAREN REFUGEE COMMITTEE MONTHLY REPORT

TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS IN PAPUA NEW GUINEA: AN EMERGING ORGANIZED TRANSNATIONAL CRIMINAL ACTIVITY

Thailand Burma Border Consortium Strategic Plan (Reviewed & revised, Jan 2012)

A Fine Line between Migration and Displacement

Transcription:

Page 1 Monthly Report Of KSDC Karenni Refugee Camp 1 The judicial system and public opinion in Karenni Refugee Camp 1 October 2014 Researched and written by Kee Meh, Oo April and Lee Contents 1 Acknowledgements 2 Introduction 3 Purpose 4 A brief history of Karenni Refugee Camp 1 5 A brief history of justice in Karenni Refugee Camp 1 6 The goal of Camp Justice 7 The structure of Camp Justice 8 The current judicial system -Advantages -Disadvantages 9 Public Opinion of the justice system 10 Data on legal cases in 2014 11 Activities of camp security 12 Activities of the warden 13 Legal Assistance Center service 13.1 Criteria for transfer of Jurisdiction to Thai courts 14 Recommendations 15 Conclusions 16 Interviewees list

Issue 1 Page 2 1 Acknowledgements Thank you to teachers, staff, parents, brothers and sisters for helping us to get a good report. Also, thank you to the SDC teachers for teaching us how to collect information. We are especially thankful to Teacher Thyar Myar for training us and understanding our weaknesses. Additionally, for helping us write and edit our report. We also thank the donors and Teacher Aung Sun Myint for supporting the school materials such as pens, pencils, books, recorders and other materials. We, Lee, Oo April and Kee Meh will say thank you to the judges, justice organisation and the public for participating and explaining to us about the situation. Collecting information for this report 2 Introduction In this report, we are going to write about the people s perspective of the camp justice system and how they carry out their work. We have met with the Camp justice staff and also camp justice members. We had only one month to complete this report including how to write the report and collect the information. However, We tried our best to collect sufficient information to explain about the topic. In this report, we have a summary and a history of camp justice and the judge s efforts, their successes and their challenges. According to this topic, we wrote this report to raise awareness and t provide good information. 3 Purpose 1) To raise awareness about the camp justice system in Karenni Refugee Camp 1 2) To share the opinion of the public about camp justice 3) To provide information for all camp residents to know about the camp justice system 4) To understand the procedure for judicial decision making 5) To know if every decision has been made fairly 6) To know about adjudicatory powers and functions

Page 3 Monthly Report Of KSDC 7) To know the annual number of court cases. 4 A brief history of Karenni Refugee Camp 1 The refugee camp opened in April 1986. It opened because of fighting between the Burmese military and the Karenni military. Refugees arrived at Hsaw Roe Lan village. At this time, four Burmese army columns marched to battle in Karenni state. They arrived at Khaw Khaw, Ywar Thit, Na Moe and Ta Ta Moe villages. For this reason, Karenni people formed an army to fight back. The Burmese army columns marched to Karenni State because they wanted to quell the Karenni resistance. This time, they did not quell the resistance. They only burnt the houses and killed the local villagers. This caused around 60 households to flee to the Thai border. Moreover, in 1988 there were the student protests and boycotts. Also, Karenni leaders appealed to Thai royalty to let them stay in Thailand. After this, they created Karenni Refugee Camp 1. In 1991, they began to receive NGO support. Between 1992 and 1993, many refugees arrived in camp 1. Between 1995-1996, more people arrived in the refugee camp. Now, the situation in Karenni Refugee Camp 1 is unstable because of the ceasefire inside Karenni State and the resettlement program. Thus, Karenni refugee social support has declined. 5 A brief history of justice in Karenni Refugee Camp 1 The camp justice was established by the Karenni government in 2003. Before 2003, all cases, which happened in camp, had to be solved by the camp committee. In 2000, many NGOs came to camp and suggested for there to be a camp justice. Currently they have six staff in camp justice. The judge is Bue Myar and the justice members are Nga and Sa Lah. There are also two other staff and one office assistant. There are many steps to progressing upwards professionally in the office of camp justice. Camp Justice The camp justice office in Karenni Refugee Camp 1 has now been running for 11 years. Due to the camp justice activities and championing themselves, many people know about camp justice. So, camp justice has been able to run until now. 6 The goal of Camp Justice In Karenni refugee camp 1, the tasks of camp justice are to resolve problems between citizens and also between citizens and government. Therefore, it is necessary for the decisions of judges to be impartial and free. Decisions must be made fairly. For the decision to be fair, everyone is entitled to equal rights before the court. In the future, our community will also be sustainable. Therefore camp justice needs to think deeply about how to provide fair and justice decisions. The law must protect everyone s safety, liberty, justice and property.

Issue 1 Page 4 7 The structure of Camp Justice At the camp justice office there are 3 judges, 2 staff and one office assistant. The head of the office is Daw Bue Myar. Nga and Sa La are justice members. Oo Meh and Pree Meh are staff of camp justice. Kawlee Wah is an office assistant. Judiciary Justice members Head Judge Justice members Administrative Secretary Assistant 8 The current judicial system In Karenni Refugee Camp 1, camp justice can only decide on civil cases not criminal cases. Most of the cases are about divorce. If parties are not satisfied with the decision they have a right to appeal. The current judicial situation is worse than in the past. The judges give equal rights to plaintiffs and defendants before the law. In some cases, the judge has to make their decision based upon customary law. The judge said that it is better to make a decision by law than by custom. If there is a criminal case, it must be transferred to the Thai judicial system. The judges have faced difficulties with divorce cases. The judges have to make satisfactory Interviewing with a justice member decisions for both parties. The justice member, Oo Nga, said that he has seen many divorce cases but often after the case the couples get back together. In camp justice, they need to use three types of law; they need to use the camp law, the Thai law and customary law. They have to ask defendants what law they would prefer the trial to be held under. Some people prefer customary law; some people prefer the camp law. From January October 2014, they have had 40 cases in the camp. In 2014, the cases

Page 5 Monthly Report Of KSDC have increased from previous years. There are 9 cases which are yet to be decided. Sometimes, there are no holidays for the judges. Some people don t understand the law so after the decisions they complain to the judges that the decisions are unfair. The justice member Oo Nga said that we try and we aim to mediate for every case. -Advantages 1) The judges are not biased between plaintiffs and defendants. They just make their decisions by following the law 2) Every decision they have made in the past is fair 3) Most of the plaintiffs accept the judge s decision 4) The judges have the power to make decisions in civil cases that happen in Karenni Refugee Camp 1 -Disadvantages 1) Some defendants are not satisfied so they challenge the judge s decision. 2) The judges are not properly qualified 3) For criminal cases, they have to transfer to Thai courts so it takes a long time for the defendant to face trial. 4) There are suicides after some cases 9 Public Opinion of the justice system In Karenni Refugee Camp1, there are often cases involving domestic violence, divorce, intoxication and assault. The plaintiff and defendant sometimes say that it is not fair for the camp justice to make a decision. Some people want to use customary law; some people want to use camp law. Oo Law said There are not differences between procedural law and the rule of law. Then Oo Byar said that If we don t have the law, it is not safe for civilian protection and there is no organisation in the camp. Oo Ee said When you solve the problem or case, it is better to use the camp law because sometimes the customary law is not fair. It means you do not respect the camp law.

Issue 1 Page 6 10 Data on legal cases in 2014 Identification Type of case Criminal or civil Total number of number cases 1 Divorce Civil 24 2 Breach of promise Civil 4 3 Adultery Civil 4 4 Domestic Violence Civil 1 5 Wills and inheritance Civil 1 6 Public decency offences Civil 1 7 Polyandry Civil 1 8 Domestic assault Civil 1 9 Assault with a weapon Criminal 1 10 Battery Civil 1 11 Paramour Civil 1 12 Assault Civil 1 13 Sexual deception Civil 1 14 Theft Criminal 1 11 Activities of camp security The camp security was founded by the security director with 81 members of security for camp. The securities responsibilities are that they have to monitor the camp especially during festivals, meetings or elections. The security has to mediate between intoxicated people and during fights. The security has to follow up on any issue that occurs. The security is only allowed to hold perpetrators in custody for a maximum of 24 hours. Then, a case can be opened in a court of law. In 2014, 64 people brought requests for cases to camp security. Currently, there is no one imprisoned in the camp jail. There are only people with some mental health problems staying there. Entrance to the camp security office 12 Activities of the warden The warden has taken this responsibility since 2013. According to him, he has faced a lot of challenges during his period of service. Among the prisoners most of them have mental disabilities, suffer from drug addiction or are going through a divorce or family problem. Most of the prisoners are unemployed. Depending on their health situation, sometimes they can be made to clean the health compound. As a warden, he has to take care of the prisoners. If a prisoner gets sick, the warden needs to try and get medicine for them. Depending on the severity of

Page 7 Monthly Report Of KSDC a crime, the warden can call the prisoner can lead a prisoner to the clinic. For the serious case, the warden must go to the clinic on behalf of them and get the recommendation from the medic. The warden also needs to cook for the prisoner by himself. The warden said I need to have my meal together with the prisoner. There is no smoking or drugs allowed in the compound. If a prisoner wants to meet their parents or relatives, the warden needs to try to contact them for him. However, for the relatives to meet the prisoner, they need to get a document or permission from the security department first. Therefore, according to the warden, during last April too many prisoners arrived and there Entrance to the camp prison area was not enough space to cook food for them. This was a big problem. We would like to say that for the warden they have a lot of duties and they face depression about their duties. 13 Legal Assistance Center service (LAC) LAC was set up outside camp in 2006. It was moved to camp in 2007. The group that founded and opened this organisation was IRC (International Rescue Committee). There are 20 members of the LAC staff. There are 6 members in Mae Hong Son Province, 10 in Karenni refugee Camp 1 and 4 in Karenni Refugee Camp 2. There are three objectives of LAC: 1) For all of the refugee people to receive equal opportunities with Thai people before the law. 2) To make sure people know about Thai Law and are able to follow it. Also, to provide the security officials, section leaders and judges information about Thai Law. Therefore, LAC tries to provide trainings to the security institute, students and the public in Karenni Refugee Camp 1. 3) LAC tries to cooperate with the court, justice, security and camp administration department. LAC is an organisation who tries to help accused people be handed over to the Thai courts. They also try to provide the knowledge to the section leaders to be able to solve the small cases that are occurring in these sections. All of these above are LACs responsibilities. Other responsibilities are to ensure the accused that is handed over to a Thai court is treated equally. They also try to help citizens imprisoned in Thai courts to be able to meet with their relatives. They also try to get or rent some lawyers for the accused. LAC always works for the community. The big challenge for LAC is to understand the Thai law and also for those living in Thailand to understand this. LAC is also trying to help accused who come from inside Karenni State to receive advice. LAC helps to solve the problem which occurs between Thai and Karenni refugee people. There are four main activities of LAC: Rule of Law body

Issue 1 Page 8 Trainer body Judiciary body Translation body 13.1 Criteria for transfer of Jurisdiction to Thai courts If a case from Karenni Refugee Camp 1 cannot be solved by camp justice, they must contact LAC to transfer to the Thai courts. Cases that must be transferred are; Rape murder theft drug use human trafficking illegal logging assault with weapons child exploitation These cases are criminal cases so they cannot be solved inside the camp. 14 Recommendations Recommendations to KNRC: KNRC should take responsibility in order for camp justice to have enough staff. When KNRC appoint judges, the judges should have finished law school or have knowledge of law KNRC should support office materials KNRC should support for the judge s stipend Recommendations to the Justice members: All staff should come to work regularly All camp justice staff should stay in their position until the conclusion of any cases that they are residing over The judges should campaign to others about the law Recommendations to camp security: - Security should guide people on what they can and can t do - The camp security should not threaten the accused - The camp security should not torture the accused - The camp security should not use unnecessary force to apprehend suspects -The camp security should ask questions in a calm and clear manner -The camp security must avoid corruption

Page 9 Monthly Report Of KSDC 15 Conclusions In this report, we wrote about the camp justice system in the opinion of the public. This included LAC activities and camp security. We, Karenni people, had to flee from our homeland to the Thai-Burma border due to conflict. The reason that we fled our homeland is the government s mismanagement. We, Karenni people, must try hard to be t same level as other countries. Thus, we need to build a society with a free and fair judiciary. 16 Interviewees list Interviewee Number Name Sex Age Job Ethnic group Interview Date Religion Interview place 1 Khu Oo Male 39 Security Commander Kayah 13/10/2014 Buddhist Camp Security 2 Khu Poe Tau Male 49 Warden Kayah 13/10/2014 Roman Catholic Camp prison 3 Oo Byar 4 Oo Ee 5 Oo Nga 6 Oo Law 7 Oo Sa La 8 Daw Lee Ma Kay Male 37 Section leader Kayah 14/10/2014 Animist Section 17 Male 37 Section leader Kayah 14/10/2014 Animist Section 8 Male 44 Justice Kayah 14/10/2014 Animist Camp member Justice Male 27 Section Kayah 15/10/2014 Roman Section 6 leader Catholic Male 46 Justice Shan 15/10/2014 Buddhist High member School Female 28 LAC trainer Kayah 17/10/2014 Roman LAC office Catholic 9 Yong Male 38 LAC manager Thai 17/10/2014 Buddhist LAC office 10 Oo Ee 11 Daw Moe Bu 12 Daw Bue Myar Male 66 Social security staff Kayah 18/10/2014 Roman Catholic Female 30 Camp leader Kayah 23/10/2014 Roman Catholic Section 17 Camp committe e Female - Judge Kayah 23/10/2014 Animist Camp Justice

The vision of Social Development Center is to promote the lives of the people who have suffered human rights abuses, to teach non-violent skills to build up a new society, to develop the rule of law, to value human dignity and to protect the environment. To achieve our mission statement we rely on various avenues of support including core organizational and project funding from our major donors. We are also supported by our own community, local staff and the generous help of volunteers from across the globe. Mae Hong Son, Thailand PO BOX 20 58000 +66 0898526619 officesdc@yahoo.com If you are interested in making a donation, please email officesdc@yahoo.com. Please title your message SDC Donation. If you are interested in volunteering with us, please email us at the same address: officesdc@yahoo.com. We accept volunteers for a minimum of three months. Furthermore, if there is any other way you would like to provide us with support or assistance, please email us at the same address: officesdc@yahoo.com. Acknowledgements On behalf of SDC and all our students, we would like to thank our core funders: - The American Jewish World Service - The Open Society Institute - Refugees International Japan Our partners: - Earthrights International - The Curriculum project - Mote Oo Education Visit us at: http://sdcthailand.wordpress.com We would also like to thank anyone who has volunteered with our organization now or in the past. Finally, we would like to thank you the reader for showing an interest in supporting the cause of our people with your support we can go from strength to strength in the future. Thank you!