TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.1 GENERAL RIGHT OF ACTION UNDER C.R.S LIMITED RIGHT OF ACTION UNDER C.R.S

Similar documents
KY DRAM SHOP MEMO II

HEALTH CARE LIABILITY UPDATE, 2014

NEGLIGENCE. All four of the following must be demonstrated for a legal claim of negligence to be successful:

AN IN-DEPTH LOOK AT TEXAS' NEW TORT REFORM LAW PRESENTED BY: McDONALD SANDERS. A Professional Corporation ATTORNEYS AT LAW

Fall 1995 December 15, 1995 SAMPLE ANSWER TO MID-TERM EXAM QUESTION 1

Jeffrey V. Hill Bodyfelt Mount LLP 707 Southwest Washington St. Suite 1100 Portland, Oregon (503)

Case 9:15-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Plaintiff, Number:

Provisions of the Health Payment Reform Act Affecting Medical Malpractice Litigation

Case 1:19-cv PAB Document 1 Filed 01/04/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Filing # E-Filed 12/22/ :53:20 PM

CONDENSED OUTLINE FOR TORTS I

FALL 2001 December 15, 2001 FALL SEMESTER SAMPLE ANSWER

Case 1:16-cv MEH Document 1 Filed 09/20/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

/ Court: 055

STATE LAW SUMMARY Overview of the State of Wisconsin Updated 2013

Civil Liability Amendment (Personal Responsibility) Act 2002 No 92

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Gwinn & Roby Attorneys and Counselors

SUMMER 1995 August 11, 1995 SAMPLE ANSWER TO FINAL EXAM

The section Causation: Actual Cause and Proximate Cause from Business Law and the Legal Environment was adapted by The Saylor Foundation under a

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FL0RIDA

STATE OF OKLAHOMA. 1st Session of the 57th Legislature (2019) AS INTRODUCED

Massachusetts Premises Liability

v. Record No OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN March 3, 2000 MATT MARY MORAN, INC., ET AL.

Tort Reform (2) The pleading specifically asserts that the medical care has and all medical records

Second Regular Session. Sixty-second General Assembly LLS NO Debbie Haskins HOUSE BILL STATE OF COLORADO.

Title 28-A: LIQUORS. Chapter 100: MAINE LIQUOR LIABILITY ACT. Table of Contents Part 8. LIQUOR LIABILITY...

TEXAS DISCOVERY. Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY

TORTS Course: LAW 509 (Sections 2 & 4) Spring Semester 2018

PROFESSOR DEWOLF FALL 2009 December 12, 2009 FINAL EXAM SAMPLE ANSWER

NMDLA Winter 2009 Article. Coverage and UM/UIM

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

CASE NO. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. The Plaintiff, CHARLESETTA WALKER, as CONSERVATOR FOR THE PERSON,

Number 41 of 1961 CIVIL LIABILITY ACT 1961 REVISED. Updated to 13 April 2017

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA BIRMINGHAM DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

STOECKEL, JAMES MOORE, JIMMY D. COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

American Tort Reform Association 1101 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite 400 Washington, DC (202) Fax: (202)

IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE * * * *

Texas Tort Reform Legislation. By: Judge Mike Engelhart 151 st District Court

Question 1. On what theory or theories might damages be recovered, and what defenses might reasonably be raised in actions by:

2014 PA Super 128. Appellee No. 192 MDA 2013

Plaintiffs, Defendants. COMPLAINT. necessary medical care for serious medical needs by the defendants during her commitment to the

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

REPEALED LIMITATION ACT CHAPTER 266

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/04/ :53 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/04/2016

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND

THE WEEK IN TORTS FLORIDA LAW WEEKLY VOLUME 40, NUMBER 7 CASES FROM THE WEEK OF FEBRUARY 13, 2015

Civil Justice for Victims of Crime in Idaho

ASSUMPTION OF RISK, RELEASE AND LIABILITY WAIVER

SPRING 2009 May 7, 2009 FINAL EXAM SAMPLE ANSWER MULTIPLE CHOICE

Case 2:17-cv GJQ-TPG ECF No. 1 filed 01/25/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

TORTS. University of Houston Spring, Deana Pollard-Sacks, Visiting Professor of Law

Torts I review session November 20, 2017 SLIDES. Negligence

Filing # E-Filed 08/31/ :25:22 PM

U.S. VICTIMS OF STATE SPONSORED TERRORISM FUND FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (Updated November 2017)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case Number: 07CV522. Division 1, Courtroom 302

Best 50 articles of civil code of Japan which are frequently applied in the courts

TYPES OF MONETARY DAMAGES

In the United States District Court for the District of Colorado

IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE. Plaintiff v. Defendant TRIAL BRIEF OF PLAINTIFF

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF HAMPTON ) CASE NO.: 2019-CP-25-

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 18, 2009 Session

Complaint - Walmart Substance on Floor in Frozen Food Dept.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

PET. Professional Employment Test.

Sources of Liability

MARCH 23, Referred to Committee on Judiciary

BARRED OFFENSES REGULATED CHILD CARE Effective November 1, 2016

The Honorable Chainnan and Members ofthe Board ofcounty Commissioners. William M. Davis, Interim Director, Risk Management

Civil Justice for Victims of Crime in Ohio

Monica Vickery sought review of the court of appeals. damages in her defamation suit against the mother and sister of

Transition to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Act of This chapter may be cited as the "Criminal Injuries Compensation Act.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/30/ :06 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 60 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/30/2017

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

Rhode Island Statute CHAPTER Health Care Power of Attorney

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/ :23 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015

Alcohol Beverage Liability: Legal Update and Best Practices

MBE Civil Procedure Sample Test Questions

CONTRACT DISPUTES: WINNING FROM THE BEGINNING

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/ :33 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 49 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/07/2016

See you in court! Starting a Civil Lawsuit in the Sacramento Superior Court

Professor DeWolf Fall 2008 Torts I December 9, 2008 SAMPLE ANSWER TO MIDTERM EXAM QUESTION 1

State Laws Chart I: Liability Reforms

6.1 Part not to apply in certain cases (16.1, PD 16) (1) Subject to paragraph (2), this Part, except (a) rules 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.9 and 6.

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE. vs.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/20/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/20/2014

FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 01/23/ :02 PM

PROPOSED RULE CHANGES (REPEAL AND REENACTMENT) COLORADO RULES OF PROBATE PROCEDURE

SUMMER 2004 August 12, 2004 FINAL EXAM SAMPLE ANSWER

Civil Liability Act 1936

H 7340 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Fall 1997 December 20, 1997 SAMPLE ANSWER TO MID-TERM EXAM QUESTION 1

Damages in Tort 6. Damages in Contract 18. Restitution 27. Rescission 32. Specific Performance 38. Account of Profits 40.

General Issues in Remedies. Eric E. Johnson ericejohnson.com. Konomark Most rights sharable. Law vs. Equity

Transcription:

TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 OVERVIEW OF WRONGFUL DEATH LAW IN COLORADO........................................... 1 Chapter 2 COLORADO S WRONGFUL DEATH ACT................... 3 2.1 GENERAL RIGHT OF ACTION UNDER C.R.S. 13-21-202.......................... 3 2.2 LIMITED RIGHT OF ACTION UNDER C.R.S. 13-21-201.......................... 4 2.3 PROPER PARTIES UNDER C.R.S. 13-21-201........ 4 2.4 DISTRIBUTION OF PROCEEDS OF A WRONGFUL DEATH ACTION..................... 6 2.5 LIMITATIONS ON DAMAGES UNDER C.R.S. 13-21-203.......................... 7 2.6 THE SOLATIUM ALTERNATIVE UNDER C.R.S. 13-21-203.5....................... 11 2.7 STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR WRONGFUL DEATH CLAIMS.................... 11 2.8 THE SURVIVAL STATUTE C.R.S. 13-20-101..... 12 Chapter 3 HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF COLORADO WRONGFUL DEATH LAW ABOLITION OF THE NET PECUNIARY LOSS RULE....................... 13 3.1 STATUTORY CHANGES.......................... 13 3.2 THE NET PECUNIARY LOSS RULE HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE..................... 14 TOC-3

Handbook of Colorado Wrongful Death Law Chapter 4 WHOSE DEATH WILL GIVE RISE TO A WRONGFUL DEATH ACTION............................ 21 4.1 WRONGFUL DEATH CLAIM FOR CHILD WHO DIES AS A RESULT OF INJURY SUFFERED AS A FETUS.................. 21 4.1.1 Premature Birth As A Result Of Prenatal Injuries............................ 21 4.1.2 Child Born Alive Is A Person For Purposes Of The WDA, Regardless Of The Viability Of The Fetus................... 24 4.2 WRONGFUL DEATH ACTION FOR DEATH OF A FETUS............................. 26 4.3 WRONGFUL BIRTH AND WRONGFUL LIFE....... 26 4.4 LOGICAL INCONSISTENCIES IN THE COURTS RULINGS......................... 29 Chapter 5 PROPER PLAINTIFFS IN WRONGFUL DEATH ACTIONS........................... 31 5.1 ONLY ONE WRONGFUL DEATH ACTION PERMITTED............................ 32 5.2 PARENT OF PERSON ADOPTED AS AN ADULT................................... 35 5.3 PARENTS OF A MARRIED MAN OR WOMAN...... 35 5.4 EQUITABLY ADOPTED CHILDREN............... 38 5.5 SIBLINGS....................................... 39 TOC-4

Table of Contents 5.6 SAME PERSON AS PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT............................... 41 5.7 ACTIONS UNDER 42 U.S.C. 1983 PARENTS AS PLAINTIFFS........................ 42 5.8 WRONGFUL DEATH ACTIONS ARE NOT ASSIGNABLE............................... 45 Chapter 6 ALLOCATION OF PROCEEDS FROM A WRONGFUL DEATH ACTION............................ 49 6.1 HEIRS MAY SHARE IN PROCEEDS EVEN IF NOT NAMED AS PLAINTIFFS.................. 49 6.2 DIVISION OF PROCEEDS UNDER CURRENT LAW................................. 51 6.3 DUTY OF INSURANCE COMPANY IN SETTLING WRONGFUL DEATH CLAIM TO MONITOR DISTRIBUTION OF PROCEEDS................... 52 6.4 NO DUTY OWED BY ATTORNEY WHO REPRESENTS SPOUSE IN WRONGFUL DEATH ACTION TO ENSURE PROCEEDS ARE PROPERLY DISTRIBUTED TO HEIRS............. 54 6.5 DIVISION OF PROCEEDS BETWEEN PARENTS STATUTORY CHANGES.......................... 55 Chapter 7 CONFLICT OF LAWS PRINCIPLES GOVERNING WRONGFUL DEATH CASES................. 59 TOC-5

Handbook of Colorado Wrongful Death Law Chapter 8 STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS GOVERNING WRONGFUL DEATH ACTIONS........................... 63 8.1 TOLLING OF THE STATUTE DUE TO DISABILITY................................. 64 8.2 TOLLING OF THE STATUTE DUE TO FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT.............. 66 8.3 ADOPTION OF THE DISCOVERY RULE........... 68 8.4 APPLICABILITY OF THE DISCOVERY RULE UNDER THE CURRENT STATUTE.......... 71 8.5 WRONGFUL DEATH CLAIMS AGAINST A DECEDENT S ESTATE......................... 71 8.6 EXPIRATION OF LIMITATIONS PERIOD FOR UNDERLYING MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE CLAIM DOES NOT BAR WRONGFUL DEATH ACTION................ 73 8.7 RELATION BACK OF AMENDED COMPLAINT WHERE MISTAKE IS MADE REGARDING IDENTITY OF PROPER PARTY TO SUE..................... 74 Chapter 9 EXEMPLARY DAMAGES IN WRONGFUL DEATH ACTIONS........................................ 79 9.1 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE..................... 79 9.2 STATUTORY CHANGES IN 2000................... 81 9.3 LIABILITY OF CORPORATE DEFENDANT FOR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES.................... 82 TOC-6

Table of Contents Chapter 10 LIABILITY ISSUES...................................... 85 10.1 NATURE OF WRONGFUL ACT, NEGLECT, OR DEFAULT THAT WILL GIVE RISE TO ACTION UNDER C.R.S. 13-21-202................ 87 10.2 DECEDENT S SURVIVOR MAY NOT ASSERT INDEPENDENT CLAIMS IN OWN NAME FOR CLAIMS THAT COULD HAVE BEEN MAINTAINED BY DECEDENT HAD HE OR SHE LIVED............................... 88 10.3 APPLICATION OF COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE AND PRO RATA LIABILITY STATUTES TO WRONGFUL DEATH ACTIONS..... 89 10.3.1 Plaintiff May Recover As Long As Negligence Attributable To Decedent Is Less Than Combined Negligence Of Defendant And Designated Non-Party......... 89 10.3.2 Plaintiffs Decision To Ride In Vehicle With Intoxicated Driver Was Proper Basis For Affirmative Defense Of Comparative Negligence............................... 91 10.3.3 Evidence Of Motorcyclist s Failure To Wear A Helmet And Lack Of A Driver s License Is Inadmissible To Show Comparative Negligence In A Wrongful Death Action....... 93 10.4 DETERMINATION OF LEGAL DUTY IS A QUESTION OF LAW FACTORS CONSIDERED BY COURTS....................... 95 10.4.1 Automobile Dealer Had No Duty To Warn Decedent Of Hazard Posed By Inoperable Seat Belt....................... 95 10.4.2 Plumbing Contractor Had No Duty To Warn About A Defective Gas Connector On Stove On Which Contractor Did Not Work................... 96 TOC-7

Handbook of Colorado Wrongful Death Law 10.4.3 Sheriff Had No Duty To Protect Citizen From Escaped Jail Inmate................... 98 10.4.4 Where Child Was Killed In Sandwich Shop After Employee Let Stranger Into Shop After Hours, Complaint Alleged Sufficient Facts That Owner Breached Duty To Child As Licensee Under Premises Act............. 99 10.4.5 County Jail Has Duty To Take Reasonable Care To Prevent An Inmate From Committing Suicide....................... 101 10.5 WRONGFUL DEATH CLAIMS AGAINST GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES APPLICATION OF THE COLORADO GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY ACT.............. 102 10.5.1 Governmental Immunity For Emergency Vehicle Operators........................ 103 10.5.2 Governmental Immunity For Dangerous Condition Of County Road................. 106 10.5.3 Governmental Immunity For Sanitation Facilities....................... 107 10.5.4 Governmental Immunity For Public Hospital... 110 10.5.5 Limit On Recovery Of Damages Under The CGIA......................... 111 10.5.6 Corporate Practice Of Medicine Rule Bars Claims Against Public Hospitals For Negligence Of Employed Physicians......... 113 10.5.7 Governmental Immunity For Failure To Supervise Weight Room In Public Recreation Facility Dangerous Conditions Of Public Buildings............. 115 10.5.8 Governmental Immunity For Sheriff s Deputy Involved In Fatal Shooting Of Motorist............................. 116 TOC-8

Table of Contents 10.6 ISSUES IN CASES OF DEATH BY SUICIDE, MURDER-SUICIDE, AND HOMICIDE............. 117 10.6.1 Liability Of Mental Health Facility For Death Of Suicidal Patient Comparative Negligence Rules Apply................... 117 10.6.2 Legal Duty To Prevent Another Person From Committing Suicide.................. 118 10.6.3 Legal And Factual Issues In Murder-Suicide Cases..................... 120 10.6.4 Actions Under The Slayer Statute, C.R.S. 15-11-803....................... 126 10.6.5 Proximate Causation In Suicide Cases........ 132 10.7 GENERAL CAUSATION ISSUES.................. 135 10.7.1 Remote Causation........................ 135 10.7.2 Negligence, Without Causation.............. 136 10.7.3 Colorado Follows The But For Test For Causation-In-Fact................. 137 10.8 APPLICABILITY OF ARBITRATION CLAUSES TO WRONGFUL DEATH CLAIMS...... 139 10.9 WRONGFUL DEATH CLAIMS UNDER THE PREMISES LIABILITY ACT................. 142 10.9.1 Who Is A Landowner Under The PLA?....... 142 10.9.2 Mass Shooting In Theatre Was Not Unforeseeable As A Matter Of Law.......... 143 10.10 WRONGFUL DEATH CLAIMS UNDER THE SKI SAFETY ACT.......................... 145 TOC-9

Handbook of Colorado Wrongful Death Law Chapter 11 COMPENSATORY DAMAGES IN WRONGFUL DEATH ACTIONS.......................... 149 11.1 LIMIT ON RECOVERY OF NON-ECONOMIC DAMAGES APPLIES ON A PER-CLAIM BASIS; THE LIMIT APPLIES COLLECTIVELY TO ALL PLAINTIFFS IN SUIT, AND DOES NOT APPLY ON A PER-DEFENDANT BASIS............ 150 11.2 RECOVERY OF ECONOMIC LOSSES ILLUSTRATIVE CASES......................... 152 11.3 SUMMARY OF GENERAL PRINCIPLES CONCERNING APPLICATION OF THE NET PECUNIARY LOSS RULE TO DETERMINE RECOVERY OF COMPENSATORY DAMAGES FOR ECONOMIC LOSS............... 161 11.4 ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE OF SETTLEMENT................................. 161 11.5 RECOVERY OF THE SOLATIUM AMOUNT UNDER C.R.S. 13-21-203.5...................... 164 11.5.1 Applicability Of The Comparative Negligence Statute To Recovery Of Solatium Amount..... 164 11.5.2 Solatium Award Is Not Subject To Reduction Based Upon Settlement That Plaintiff Receives From Former Defendant........... 166 11.6 EVIDENCE OF A DECEDENT S FUTURE INCOME TAX LIABILITY IS NOT ADMISSIBLE FOR PURPOSES OF CALCULATING NET PECUNIARY LOSS.......... 168 TOC-10

Table of Contents 11.7 IN SOME WRONGFUL DEATH ACTIONS, OTHER STATUTORY CAP PROVISIONS, NOT THE STATUTORY CAPS IN THE WRONGFUL DEATH ACT, MAY LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF RECOVERABLE DAMAGES..................... 170 11.8 PREJUDGMENT INTEREST AS AN ELEMENT OF DAMAGES....................... 171 11.9 WHERE MULTIPLE PARTIES BRING A WRONGFUL DEATH ACTION AS PLAINTIFFS, NO REQUIREMENT EXISTS FOR EACH PLAINTIFF TO PROVE PERSONAL DAMAGES... 173 Chapter 12 APPLYING DRAM SHOP LIABILITY LAWS TO WRONGFUL DEATH ACTIONS....................... 175 12.1 TAVERN OWNER IS NOT LIABLE FOR DEATH OF INTOXICATED PATRON RESULTING FROM PATRON S OWN CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL.................. 175 12.2 EMPLOYER, ACTING AS SOCIAL HOST, IS NOT LIABLE UNDER THE DRAM SHOP ACT FOR DEATH RESULTING FROM EMPLOYEE S CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES ON EMPLOYER S PREMISES....................... 177 Chapter 13 CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES ARISING FROM COLORADO S WRONGFUL DEATH ACT................. 179 13.1 CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES TO THE WDA.................................. 179 13.2 MINIMUM CONTACTS NECESSARY TO ESTABLISH PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER FOREIGN DEFENDANT................... 182 TOC-11

Handbook of Colorado Wrongful Death Law APPENDICES Appendix A SAMPLE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND........................... 187 Appendix B SAMPLE ANSWER TO COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND...................... 197 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES........................................... 205 SUBJECT INDEX.................................................... 215 TOC-12