The Effect of Sexual Violence on Negotiated Outcomes in Civil Conflict: Online Appendix

Similar documents
Human Rights Violations and Competitive Elections in Dictatorships

Supporting Information for Inclusion and Public. Policy: Evidence from Sweden s Introduction of. Noncitizen Suffrage

Supplementary Material for Preventing Civil War: How the potential for international intervention can deter conflict onset.

Powersharing, Protection, and Peace. Scott Gates, Benjamin A. T. Graham, Yonatan Lupu Håvard Strand, Kaare W. Strøm. September 17, 2015

Rebel Finance and Sexual Violence

Appendix: Regime Type, Coalition Size, and Victory

Do States Free Ride in Antitrust Enforcement?

Pathbreakers? Women's Electoral Success and Future Political Participation

WEB APPENDIX. to accompany. Veto Players and Terror. Journal of Peace Research 47(1): Joseph K. Young 1. Southern Illinois University.

Chapter 8: The Use of Force

Surviving Elections: Election Violence, Incumbent Victory, and Post-Election Repercussions January 11, 2016

Contiguous States, Stable Borders and the Peace between Democracies

Online Appendix to Mechanical and Psychological. Effects of Electoral Reform.

Appendix: Political Capital: Corporate Connections and Stock Investments in the U.S. Congress,

Can Politicians Police Themselves? Natural Experimental Evidence from Brazil s Audit Courts Supplementary Appendix

Does government decentralization reduce domestic terror? An empirical test

Corruption, Political Instability and Firm-Level Export Decisions. Kul Kapri 1 Rowan University. August 2018

Strengthening Protection of Labor Rights through Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs)

Web Appendix for More a Molehill than a Mountain: The Effects of the Blanket Primary on Elected Officials Behavior in California

Online Appendix: The Effect of Education on Civic and Political Engagement in Non-Consolidated Democracies: Evidence from Nigeria

Paper Title: Political Conditionality: An Assessment of the Impacts of EU Trade and Aid Policy

Experiments in Election Reform: Voter Perceptions of Campaigns Under Preferential and Plurality Voting

WP 2015: 9. Education and electoral participation: Reported versus actual voting behaviour. Ivar Kolstad and Arne Wiig VOTE

Amy Tenhouse. Incumbency Surge: Examining the 1996 Margin of Victory for U.S. House Incumbents

Winning with the bomb. Kyle Beardsley and Victor Asal

the notion that poverty causes terrorism. Certainly, economic theory suggests that it would be

Explaining Middle East Participation in the Convention Against Torture. Derek Hoot. University of Illinois

Determinants of Return Migration to Mexico Among Mexicans in the United States

Chapter Four: Chamber Competitiveness, Political Polarization, and Political Parties

Understanding Paramilitary Violence

Supplemental Online Appendix to The Incumbency Curse: Weak Parties, Term Limits, and Unfulfilled Accountability

Supplementary Materials for Strategic Abstention in Proportional Representation Systems (Evidence from Multiple Countries)

Incumbency as a Source of Spillover Effects in Mixed Electoral Systems: Evidence from a Regression-Discontinuity Design.

Global Public Opinion toward the United Nations: Insights from the Gallup World Poll

Political Decentralization and Legitimacy: Cross-Country Analysis of the Probable Influence

Recruiting Your Way to Victory: Varying Strategies in Insurgent/Counterinsurgent Warfare

The Spatial Diffusion of Counterterrorist Legislation,

EFFECTS OF PROPERTY RIGHTS AND CORRUPTION ON GENDER DEVELOPMENT

Retrospective Voting

Allocating the US Federal Budget to the States: the Impact of the President. Statistical Appendix

The wage gap between the public and the private sector among. Canadian-born and immigrant workers

Horizontal Educational Inequalities and Civil Conflict: The Nexus of Ethnicity, Inequality, and Violent Conflict

Errata Summary. Comparison of the Original Results with the New Results

Just War or Just Politics? The Determinants of Foreign Military Intervention

Political Economics II Spring Lectures 4-5 Part II Partisan Politics and Political Agency. Torsten Persson, IIES

The Impact of the Interaction between Economic Growth and Democracy on Human Development: Cross-National Analysis

TRACKING CITIZENS UNITED: ASSESSING THE EFFECT OF INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURES ON ELECTORAL OUTCOMES

The Role of Gender Stereotypes in Gubernatorial Campaign Coverage

Financial disclosure and political selection: Evidence from India

The Chilcot inquiry into the

FACT SHEET STOPPING THE USE OF RAPE AS A TACTIC OF

Select Publically Available Conflict and Violence Datasets- Regional Typology Overview (October, 2015)

Immigration and Crime: The 2015 Refugee Crisis in Germany

The 2011 Debt Ceiling Crisis & the 2012 House Elections

How Incivility in Partisan Media (De-)Polarizes. the Electorate

FORECASTING THE 2012 ELECTION WITH THE FISCAL MODEL. Alfred G. Cuzán

Empowering Participation Examining Women s Access to Formal Financial Resources and Women s National Parliamentary Representation

Political Trust, Democratic Institutions, and Vote Intentions: A Cross-National Analysis of European Democracies

ONLINE APPENDIX: DELIBERATE DISENGAGEMENT: HOW EDUCATION

The Electoral Cycle in Political Contributions: The Incumbency Advantage of Early Elections

Non-Voted Ballots and Discrimination in Florida

NH Statewide Horserace Poll

the International Community

TECHNICAL APPENDIX. Immigrant Earnings Growth: Selection Bias or Real Progress. Garnett Picot and Patrizio Piraino*

Following the Leader: The Impact of Presidential Campaign Visits on Legislative Support for the President's Policy Preferences

Julie Lenggenhager. The "Ideal" Female Candidate

UCDP Non-state Actor Dataset Codebook

Does Inequality Increase Crime? The Effect of Income Inequality on Crime Rates in California Counties

A REPLICATION OF THE POLITICAL DETERMINANTS OF FEDERAL EXPENDITURE AT THE STATE LEVEL (PUBLIC CHOICE, 2005) Stratford Douglas* and W.

national congresses and show the results from a number of alternate model specifications for

Industrial & Labor Relations Review

Department of Economics Working Paper Series. Why Are So Many WTO Disputes Abandoned? Kara M. Reynolds. No June, 2007

A Vote Equation and the 2004 Election

Determinants of policy entrepreneur success in New York s local fracking struggles

Health care usage among immigrants and native-born elderly populations in eleven European countries: results from SHARE

AP UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS 2008 SCORING GUIDELINES

Counterterrorist Legislation and Respect for Civil Liberties: An Inevitable Collision?

Legislatures and Growth

Supplemental Appendices

Educated Preferences: Explaining Attitudes Toward Immigration In Europe. Jens Hainmueller and Michael J. Hiscox. Last revised: December 2005

Appendix 1 Details on Interest Group Scoring

Determinants and Effects of Negative Advertising in Politics

Discussion Papers In Economics And Business

Terrorism, Spoiling, and the Resolution of Civil Wars

Supplementary information for the article:

How and When Armed Conflicts End: Web appendix

Party Polarization, Revisited: Explaining the Gender Gap in Political Party Preference

The Economic Determinants of Democracy and Dictatorship

Impact of Human Rights Abuses on Economic Outlook

Working Paper: The Effect of Electronic Voting Machines on Change in Support for Bush in the 2004 Florida Elections

The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts

BJP s Demographic Dividend in the 2014 General Elections: An Empirical Analysis ±

Self-employed immigrants and their employees: Evidence from Swedish employer-employee data

Interethnic Tolerance, Demographics, and the Electoral Fate of Non-nationalistic Parties in Post-war Bosnian Municipalities

Supporting Information Political Quid Pro Quo Agreements: An Experimental Study

Girl soldiering in rebel groups, : Introducing a new dataset

Rethinking Civil War Onset and Escalation

Caught in the Crossfire: Land Reform, Death Squad Violence, and Elections in El Salvador

Unequal Recovery, Labor Market Polarization, Race, and 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Maoyong Fan and Anita Alves Pena 1

Does horizontal education inequality lead to violent conflict?

Transcription:

The Effect of Sexual Violence on Negotiated Outcomes in Civil Conflict: Online Appendix Summary statistics The following table presents information about the variables used in Table 1 of the manuscript. Table A1: Summary Statistics Variable Mean Std. Dev. Min. Max. N Outcome 0.899 1.527 0 4 1045 Government SV Prevalence 0.508 0.75 0 3 1066 Rebel SV Prevalence 0.204 0.584 0 3 1067 Equal Abuse 0.049 0.215 0 1 1067 Weak Rebels 0.91 0.287 0 1 1063 Government External Support 0.597 0.491 0 1 1067 Rebel External Support 0.576 0.494 0 1 1067 Battle Deaths 5.204 1.549 3.219 10.33 984 Government OSV 1.703 2.474 0 13.122 1067 Rebel OSV 1.301 2.188 0 10.313 1067 Peacekeepers 0.225 0.418 0 1 1067 Government Military Size 4.93 1.498 0 8.215 933 Level of Democracy 1.553 6.213-9 10 1030 Population 10.496 1.684 5.927 13.961 1057 GDP Per Capita 7.47 0.979 5.384 10.353 1012 Competing risks models across all conflict outcomes While the manuscript highlights only the models with negotiated outcomes, we present in the following tables these model specifications using the full range of potential forms of conflict termination. Many of the covariates have different effects (positive and negative) across the four conflict outcomes, although the effect is not always differentiable from zero. For example, though, as the government perpetrates higher levels of sexual violence, the conflict is less likely to result in military victory for either side (though only statistically significant for government victory) but negotiated settlements are more likely - and a stalemate/low activity outcome is also positively signed but not significant at conventional levels. 1

Table A2: Prevalence of Sexual Violence (Model 4) Model 6 Model 7 Model 8 Model 9 Gov t Victory Rebel Victory Negotiated Low Activity Government -0.978-0.663 0.342 0.139 SV Prevalence (0.543) (0.664) (0.184) (0.153) Rebel 0.276-0.072 0.160-0.261 SV Prevalence (0.812) (0.417) (0.190) (0.296) Weak Rebels 16.461-1.940-0.299 0.586 (0.602) (0.664) (0.440) (0.514) Government -0.597-0.764 0.085 0.185 External Support (0.445) (0.595) (0.257) (0.200) Rebel -1.653 0.717 0.189 0.056 External Support (0.649) (0.807) (0.247) (0.200) Battle Deaths 0.118 0.378-0.057-0.283 (0.170) (0.203) (0.113) (0.088) Government OSV 0.056 0.169-0.041-0.033 (0.119) (0.119) (0.052) (0.044) Rebel OSV -0.325-0.083 0.054-0.018 (0.258) (0.117) (0.070) (0.072) Peacekeepers -0.545-0.276 0.199-0.162 (0.745) (1.120) (0.362) (0.292) Government -0.651-0.270-0.283 0.449 Military Size (0.282) (0.325) (0.164) (0.147) Democracy -0.109 0.027 0.053-0.023 (0.048) (0.048) (0.030) (0.024) Population 0.324-0.526-0.033-0.124 (0.292) (0.387) (0.170) (0.110) GDP Per Capita 0.635-0.687 0.117-0.263 (0.258) (0.552) (0.187) (0.144) N 797 797 797 797 Failures 23 13 75 115 Conflict episode dyad-years, 1989-2008. N=797, N Conflicts =286. Results of a competing risks regression, coefficients with p-values in parentheses. 2

Table A3: Equal Perpetration of Sexual Violence (Model 5) Model 10 Model 11 Model 12 Model 13 Gov t Victory Rebel Victory Negotiated Low Activity Government -0.941-0.674 0.333 0.143 SV Prevalence (0.505) (0.786) (0.189) (0.149) Rebel 0.438-0.082 0.071-0.100 SV Prevalence (0.623) (0.463) (0.210) (0.290) Equal Abuse -14.669 0.092 0.874-0.829 (0.984) (1.301) (0.425) (0.886) Weak Rebels 15.210-1.951-0.315 0.587 (0.600) (0.709) (0.425) (0.516) Government -0.581-0.759 0.107 0.192 External Support (0.443) (0.572) (0.255) (0.199) Rebel -1.625 0.712 0.182 0.058 External Support (0.632) (0.821) (0.245) (0.199) Battle Deaths 0.110 0.377-0.078-0.288 (0.164) (0.199) (0.116) (0.089) Government OSV 0.074 0.169-0.046-0.030 (0.118) (0.120) (0.051) (0.044) Rebel OSV -0.310-0.084 0.052-0.022 (0.244) (0.121) (0.070) (0.073) Peacekeepers -0.656-0.277 0.175-0.178 (0.776) (1.133) (0.358) (0.292) Government -0.695-0.266-0.326 0.463 Military Size (0.294) (0.324) (0.163) (0.147) Democracy -0.109 0.028 0.050-0.024 (0.046) (0.046) (0.028) (0.024) Population 0.359-0.526 0.013-0.128 (0.302) (0.388) (0.166) (0.110) GDP Per Capita 0.635-0.689 0.152-0.265 (0.256) (0.549) (0.183) (0.144) N 797 797 797 797 Failures 23 13 75 115 Conflict episode dyad-years, 1989-2008. N=797, N Conflicts =286. Results of a competing risks regression, coefficients with p-values in parentheses. 3

Additional tests We conducted a number of additional competing risks regressions in an effort to further unpack relationships between dynamics of sexual violence and civil conflict outcomes. Table A4 considers what is likely to happen when combatants alter (either increase or decrease) their perpetration of wartime sexual abuse; because measuring change over time requires that a conflict last for more than one year, we lose several observations where conflicts terminated within 365 days. The new variables Government Increase and Rebel Increase are binary indicators coded 1 if the perpetration variable is higher than it was in the previous year and 0 if it stayed the same or decreased, and similarly Government Decrease and Rebel Decrease are coded 1 if the perpetration variable is lower than it was in the previous year and 0 otherwise. We see that changes in the level of abuse perpetrated by government forces does not impact the time it takes to achieve a negotiated outcome (though the overall level of abuse does hasten settlement as it increases, and makes government victory less likely), but deescalation of sexual violence by rebels also increases the propensity for the combatant sides to successfully terminate the conflict via negotiations. This might be the result of rebels making an effort to be seen as reasonable members of government in a post-conflict situation that has them sharing power with the incumbent regime following a negotiated outcome. However, we are also more likely to observe government victory when rebels deescalate their perpetration of sexual violence and this is not an outcome likely to produce post-conflict political participation by former rebels. Perhaps these situations of declining rebel abuse resulting in government victory are situations where the rebels organizational strength in general is impeded (via desertion, for example) by the decrease in rewards from sexual violence, perhaps as a result of the group s desire to be more palatable to civilians in the event of a settlement, but the government takes advantage of the situation in order to exact defeat on its opponent. In Table A5, we assess whether certain types of rebel groups are better able to force governments to come to the table. In particular, we might anticipate that rebels with external support are particularly effective at punishing governments via civilian abuse because they do not depend on winning hearts and minds of civilians and therefore can perpetrate more sexual violence without suffering negative consequences of impaired local support. To test this, we interact Rebel SV Prevalence with Rebel External Support. Here, we see that when engaging in sexual violence, rebels with external supporters and/or bases those groups that might be less reliant on the hearts and minds of locals for support and success are increasingly likely to achieve negotiated settlements with their adversarial government, or achieve outright victory. Conversely, in these cases governments are much less likely to achieve victory. This suggests that rebels with external sources of support are uniquely able to inflict pressure on the government through the sexual abuse of civilians, and as a result the government must either agree to concessions and settle the conflict (in line with existing literature on civilian killing and terrorism), or risk defeat. Thus, it appears that rebels are indeed able to use sexual violence in ways similar to lethal civilian abuse, but only in certain circumstances. Finally, Table A6 explores whether the social costs of employing sexual violence is particularly costly in societies that have higher levels of gender equality. Here we split the sample of dyad-years by countries that had low versus high respect for women s political rights, 4

as defined and coded by the CIRI database (Cingranelli, Richards, and Clay 2014). The CIRI codebook (p. 71) defines women s political rights as including the right to vote, run for political office, hold elected and appointed government positions, join political parties, and petition government officials. We consider countries as being low in this regard if CIRI codes them as a 0 or 1, meaning that women s political rights may or may not guaranteed by law, and women are either prevented from participating in politics or they hold less than five percent of seats in the legislature and other major government positions. Conversely, we treat countries as having high respect for women s political rights if they both guarantee political equality by law and women hold more than five percent of government positions (in other words, CIRI codes the country in a given year as a 2 or 3). There are not sufficient observations of rebel victories across the two samples to run our analyses on this outcome, but in situations of legal protections and higher women s political participation (CIRI women s political rights = 2 or 3) we are more likely to see negotiated settlements when rebels engage in sexual violence during civil wars. When civilians are being abused by rebels, in particular, victims and their supporters are better able to pressure the combatants to agree to end the conflict when women have some modicum of political representation and legal protection. Using the Liberian example from the manuscript, in the early 2000s the country saw a CIRI coding of 2 for women s political rights, and having increased women s representation in government may well have helped victims of wartime sexual abuse and their supporters to mobilize successfully in support of a settlement. 5

Table A4: Changes in Level of Sexual Violence Model 14 Model 15 Model 16 Gov t Victory Negotiated Low Activity Government -1.405 0.517 0.324 SV Prevalence (0.507) (0.246) (0.239) Government 0.939 0.314-0.208 SV Increase (0.592) (0.491) (0.474) Government -17.121 0.034-0.214 SV Decrease (0.875) (0.429) (0.496) Rebel -15.363 0.387 0.237 SV Prevalence (2.070) (0.281) (0.463) Rebel 1.770-0.328 0.130 SV Increase (1.815) (0.674) (0.922) Rebel 2.207 1.334-1.220 SV Decrease (1.093) (0.451) (0.994) Weak Rebels 17.035 0.396 0.404 (2.024) (0.513) (0.721) Government 0.816 0.162-0.108 External Support (1.289) (0.421) (0.326) Rebel -2.542 0.221 0.189 External Support (1.216) (0.354) (0.361) Battle Deaths -0.064-0.337-0.287 (0.215) (0.168) (0.111) Government OSV -0.097-0.079-0.033 (0.271) (0.054) (0.064) Rebel OSV -0.101-0.008-0.146 (0.369) (0.091) (0.093) Peacekeepers -15.722 0.747 0.055 (0.892) (0.452) (0.460) Government -0.427-0.223 0.128 Military Size (1.329) (0.191) (0.243) Democracy -0.146 0.071-0.031 (0.109) (0.039) (0.030) Population 0.463-0.245 0.027 (1.096) (0.183) (0.165) GDP Per Capita 0.247-0.056-0.141 (0.872) (0.253) (0.223) N 534 534 534 Failures 6 48 59 Conflict episode dyad-years, 1989-2008. N=534, N Conflicts =157. Not enough rebel victories in the sample for that outcome to be modeled. Results of a competing risks regression, 6coefficients with p-values in parentheses.

Table A5: Interaction, Rebel SV Prevalence & Rebel External Support Model 17 Model 18 Model 19 Model 20 Gov t Victory Rebel Victory Negotiated Low Activity Government -0.983-0.767 0.293 0.146 SV Prevalence (0.557) (0.611) (0.185) (0.150) Rebel 0.505-14.906-0.301 0.073 SV Prevalence (0.698) (1.081) (0.277) (0.501) Rebel SV Prev * -14.013 15.007 0.705-0.501 External Support (0.982) (0.968) (0.327) (0.605) Weak Rebels 15.744-1.921-0.294 0.574 (0.585) (0.649) (0.426) (0.520) Government -0.611-0.761 0.128 0.181 External Support (0.434) (0.592) (0.260) (0.200) Rebel -1.495 0.447-0.010 0.093 External Support (0.650) (0.863) (0.274) (0.199) Battle Deaths 0.123 0.398-0.053-0.288 (0.159) (0.196) (0.116) (0.088) Government OSV 0.058 0.177-0.042-0.031 (0.116) (0.115) (0.052) (0.044) Rebel OSV -0.263-0.064 0.041-0.009 (0.254) (0.118) (0.069) (0.075) Peacekeepers -0.696 0.039 0.325-0.184 (0.839) (1.035) (0.357) (0.288) Government -0.656-0.265-0.288 0.455 Military Size (0.279) (0.321) (0.166) (0.146) Democracy -0.110 0.030 0.050-0.024 (0.047) (0.045) (0.030) (0.024) Population 0.334-0.560-0.042-0.120 (0.291) (0.378) (0.171) (0.109) GDP Per Capita 0.630-0.701 0.136-0.262 (0.255) (0.567) (0.191) (0.144) N 797 797 797 797 Failures 23 13 75 115 Conflict episode dyad-years, 1989-2008. N=797, N Conflicts =286. Results of a competing risks regression, coefficients with p-values in parentheses. 7

Table A6: Split Sample, Women s Political Rights (Low = Models 21-23, High = 24-26) Model 21 Model 22 Model 23 Model 24 Model 25 Model 26 G Victory Negotiated Low Activity G Victory Negotiated Low Activity Government -1.223 0.059-0.032-1.175 0.134 0.074 SV Prevalence (0.629) (0.492) (0.457) (0.919) (0.221) (0.191) Rebel -12.376-0.401-0.168-15.465 0.516-0.393 SV Prevalence (1.117) (0.521) (0.922) (0.787) (0.271) (0.352) Weak Rebels 16.097-0.258 16.185 18.745 0.105 0.168 (1.722) (1.434) (2.689) (0.850) (0.732) (0.838) Government -1.049 0.885 0.176-0.716 0.292 0.273 External Support (1.024) (0.915) (0.415) (0.660) (0.338) (0.273) Rebel -2.232-1.169 0.613-1.117 0.064 0.054 External Support (1.032) (1.249) (0.682) (0.706) (0.302) (0.236) Battle Deaths 0.334 0.371-0.241 0.204-0.077-0.387 (0.290) (0.288) (0.161) (0.257) (0.148) (0.140) Government OSV 0.208 0.010-0.164-0.073 0.026 0.008 (0.152) (0.076) (0.130) (0.231) (0.068) (0.060) Rebel OSV -3.488 0.250-0.086-0.181 0.027-0.007 (0.355) (0.200) (0.309) (0.301) (0.101) (0.084) Peacekeepers 0.308 0.121 2.694-15.293 0.519-0.390 (1.678) (1.373) (0.561) (0.686) (0.429) (0.372) Government -0.496-0.908 0.981-0.977-0.409 0.468 Military Size (0.433) (0.444) (0.580) (0.484) (0.190) (0.175) Democracy 0.012 0.037 0.052-0.129 0.009-0.028 (0.061) (0.058) (0.057) (0.057) (0.040) (0.029) Population 0.021 1.292-0.001 0.315 0.092-0.119 (0.572) (0.511) (0.413) (0.355) (0.171) (0.130) GDP Per Capita 0.997-0.556-1.030 0.904 0.342-0.344 (0.452) (0.521) (0.406) (0.385) (0.224) (0.190) N 175 175 175 563 563 563 Failures 11 11 35 10 55 76 Conflict episode dyad-years, 1989-2008. N=797, N Conflicts =286. Not enough rebel victories in the samples for that outcome to be modeled. Results of a competing risks regression, coefficients with p-values in parentheses. 8