Case 1:13-cv GK Document 27-1 Filed 04/28/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Similar documents
Case 1:12-cv RLW Document 48 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv RLW Document 47-1 Filed 08/31/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:10-cv JEB Document 13 Filed 08/03/11 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 1:16-cv JDB Document 33 Filed 12/28/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:13-cv JCJ Document 23-1 Filed 05/06/14 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:12-cv RBW Document 44-1 Filed 01/29/14 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv RPM Document 8 Filed 07/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement is made by and between: 1) Sierra Club; and 2)

Case 1:10-cv PLF Document 17 Filed 08/04/11 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv CKK Document 12 Filed 06/21/12 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 10/19/2017 Page 1 of 7

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. WHEREAS, on August 10, 2011, Plaintiffs Sierra Club and WildEarth Guardians filed

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case4:12-cv PJH Document82-1 Filed02/20/14 Page1 of 11

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case 1:14-cv Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/14 Page 1 of 61 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:16-cv EGS Document 21 Filed 07/05/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv JDB Document 25-2 Filed 08/20/12 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WHEREAS, Portland General Electric Company ( PGE ) is an Oregon corporation;

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT SET IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Petitioners, Respondent.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case No , consolidated with No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:08-cv RH-WCS Document 90 Filed 08/25/09 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 66 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF CONNECTICUT, COMPLAINT

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS FINAL CONSENT JUDGMENT. deliver, by hand delivery or certified mail return receipt requested, a cetiified check in the

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Judge CONSENT DECREE

Case 5:14-cv JPB Document 50 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 267

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:04-cv RWR Document 27-2 Filed 01/14/2005 Page 1 of 11

Case3:12-cv WHA Document59 Filed05/31/13 Page1 of 9

Case 6:15-cv JR Document 72 Filed 10/28/16 Page 1 of 16

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/26/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ATTORNEYS GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS AND. January 23, 2008

Case 1:17-cv RMC Document 12 Filed 11/16/17 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:13-cv FDS Document 57 Filed 08/27/14 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

VOTER WHERE TO MAIL VOTER REGISTRATION FORM. Office of the Secretary of State P.O. Box 5616 Montgomery, AL

Case 1:16-cv Document 3 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 66 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:10-cv JDB Document 8-1 Filed 06/28/10 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 05-CV-274-HA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND CONSENT DECREE. I. Background

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff Appellee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEV ADA. consented to the entry of this Consent Decree of Permanent Injunction (the "Decree"), without

mg Doc 5847 Filed 11/18/13 Entered 11/18/13 19:33:43 Main Document Pg 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA CONSENT DECREE

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/17 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

stipulated that each of the above parties shall bear its own costs and fees.

Case 3:15-cv MMC Document 32 Filed 08/26/16 Page 1 of 10

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

Case 1:18-cv JDB Document 69 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

Case 3:14-cv SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:15-cv VAB Document 46 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 52

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMPLAINT

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION WATER PIK, INC. a subsidiary of CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. An Equal Opportunity Employer

Case: 3:91-cv WHR Doc #: Filed: 03/19/15 Page: 1 of 19 PAGEID #: 12654

IN THE MATTER OF ARBITRATION BETWEEN:

ACTION: Notice announcing addresses for summons and complaints. SUMMARY: Our Office of the General Counsel (OGC) is responsible for processing

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 1:09-cv JLK Document 80-1 Filed 02/15/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:11-cv NLH -AMD Document 61 Filed 01/24/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 211 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:10-cv TSZ Document 174 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 14 THE HONORABLE THOMAS S. ZILLY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Civil Action No.: [PROPOSED] CONSENT DECREE. Press Release.

Signed July 27, 2018 United States Bankruptcy Judge

Case Document Filed in TXSB on 10/31/2007 Page t of 12 EXHIBIT A

3.23.DRAFTcmc COVENANT AND AFFILIATION AGREEMENT

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:

Case 1:17-cv RDM Document 16 Filed 06/13/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

mg Doc 5954 Filed 11/26/13 Entered 11/26/13 14:41:13 Main Document Pg 1 of 7 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Debtors.

2:13-cv SJM-LJM Doc # 12-1 Filed 05/08/13 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 36 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

VENDOR AUTHORIZATION GUIDELINES AND SAMPLES

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER FOR A CIVIL MONEY PENALTY

Case 1:17-cv EGS Document 18 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNIFORM NOTICE OF REGULATION A TIER 2 OFFERING Pursuant to Section 18(b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933

Case 2:10-cv TSZ Document 138 Filed 10/01/13 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE RECITALS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. 1. This Settlement Agreement is entered into this 23d day. of December, 1998 (hereinafter the Effective Date ) among

Case 1:12-cv ABJ Document 1 Filed 02/29/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:02-cv JR Document 78 Filed 01/29/2009 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Transcription:

Case 1:13-cv-01553-GK Document 27-1 Filed 04/28/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF NEW YORK, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Civil Action ) No. 13-1553 (GK) v. ) ) and consolidated case GINA MCCARTHY, Administrator, ) Environmental Protection Agency, and ) Civil Action ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ) No. 13-1555 (GK) ) Defendants. ) ) PARTIAL CONSENT DECREE WHEREAS, Plaintiffs, the States of New York, Connecticut, Maryland, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Vermont; the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; and Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (jointly referred to as State Plaintiffs ), filed Civil Action No. 13-1553 (GK) pursuant to Clean Air Act ( CAA ) section 304(a)(2), 42 U.S.C. 7604(a)(2), against Defendants Gina McCarthy, Administrator, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (jointly referred to as EPA ); WHEREAS, Plaintiffs, American Lung Association; Environmental Defense Fund; Clean Air Council; and Environment and Human Health, Inc. (jointly referred to as Environmental Plaintiffs ), filed Civil Action No. 13-1555 (GK) pursuant to Clean Air Act ( CAA ) section 304(a)(2), 42 U.S.C. 7604(a)(2), against EPA; WHEREAS, the Court consolidated Civil Action Nos. 13-1553 and 13-1555 (GK); WHERAS, the Court granted the motion to intervene as Plaintiff filed by the Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association ( Association Plaintiff );

Case 1:13-cv-01553-GK Document 27-1 Filed 04/28/14 Page 2 of 11 WHEREAS, the complaints filed by the State, Environmental, and Association Plaintiffs each allege that EPA failed to perform a nondiscretionary duty under CAA section 111(b)(1)(B), 42 U.S.C. 7411(b)(1)(B) to, at least every 8 years, review and, if appropriate, revise the new performance standards for new residential wood heaters that were promulgated by EPA in 1988. 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart AAA ( Wood Heater NSPS Standards ); WHEREAS, the relief requested in the Complaints filed by the State, Environmental, and Association Plaintiffs includes, among other things, an order from this Court to establish a date certain by when EPA must fulfill its obligations under CAA section 111(b)(1)(B), 42 U.S.C. 7411(b)(1)(B), with respect to the Wood Heater NSPS Standards; WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the public, the parties, and judicial economy to resolve claims without further litigation; WHEREAS, the State and Environmental Plaintiffs and EPA (jointly referred to as Parties ) have agreed to a settlement of all claims asserted by the State and Environmental Plaintiffs in their Complaints, without any admission or adjudication of fact or law, which they consider to be a just, fair, adequate and equitable resolution of said claims; WHEREAS, the Association Plaintiff has not agreed to settle its claims against EPA and does not join in this Consent Decree; WHEREAS, the Court finds and determines that the settlement represents a just, fair, adequate and equitable resolution of the claims asserted by the State and Environmental Plaintiffs; WHEREAS, by entering into this Consent Decree, the State and Environmental Plaintiffs do not waive any claims and EPA does not waive any defenses, on any grounds, related to any matters asserted in this action that are not resolved by this Decree; 2

Case 1:13-cv-01553-GK Document 27-1 Filed 04/28/14 Page 3 of 11 NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: 1. This Court has jurisdiction over the claims set forth in the Complaints of the State and Environmental Plaintiffs in these consolidated actions and may order the relief contained in the Consent Decree. Venue is proper in the District of Columbia. 2. No later than February 3, 2015, EPA shall sign a Federal Register notice taking final action with respect to the Wood Heater NSPS Standards, 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart AAA, with such modifications as EPA deems appropriate under CAA section 111(b)(1)(B), 42 U.S.C. 7411(b)(l )(B). 3. EPA shall deliver to the Office of the Federal Register for publication the notice of final rulemaking described in Paragraph 2 no later than ten business days after signature of such notice. Following such delivery, EPA shall not take any action (other than as necessary to correct any typographical error or other errors in form) to delay or otherwise interfere with publication of such notice in the Federal Register. In addition, EPA shall make available copies of said notice to the State and Environmental Plaintiffs within five business days after signature. 4. The deadlines in Paragraphs 2 and 3 above may be extended by written stipulation executed by counsel for EPA and the State and Environmental Plaintiffs and filed with the Court, or by the Court upon motion made pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by EPA and upon consideration of any response by these Plaintiffs and reply by EPA. 5. EPA agrees that the State and Environmental Plaintiffs are entitled to recover costs of litigation (including attorneys fees) ( litigation costs ) incurred in this matter pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 7604(d). The deadline for the filing of any motion for litigation costs for activities performed prior to the lodging of this decree with the Court is hereby extended for a 3

Case 1:13-cv-01553-GK Document 27-1 Filed 04/28/14 Page 4 of 11 period of 120 days. During this time the Parties shall seek to resolve informally any claim for litigation costs, and if they cannot reach a resolution, the State and Environmental Plaintiffs may seek such litigation costs from the Court. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to resolve any request for litigation costs. The State and Environmental Plaintiffs reserve their right to seek litigation costs for any work performed after the lodging of this Consent Decree. EPA does not concede that the State and Environmental Plaintiffs will be entitled to fees for any work performed after the lodging of the Consent Decree, and the parties reserve all claims and defenses with respect to any future costs of litigation claim. 6. The State and Environmental Plaintiffs and EPA shall not challenge the terms of this Consent Decree or this Court s jurisdiction to enter and enforce this Consent Decree. 7. Except for claims for litigation costs pursuant to Paragraph 5 above, the State and Environmental Plaintiffs and EPA agree that this Consent Decree shall constitute a complete and final settlement of all claims that the State and Environmental Plaintiffs asserted against the United States, including EPA, under any provision of law, in State of New York, et al. v. EPA, Case No. 1:13-cv-1553-GK (and consolidated case). The State and Environmental Plaintiffs therefore discharge and covenant not to sue the United States, including EPA, for such claims. The Parties agree that this discharge and covenant not to sue shall not apply to any claim that may arise if any final rule signed pursuant to Paragraph 2 is vacated or withdrawn. EPA retains all rights and defenses, including jurisdictional challenges, in the event any such claim is filed by the State or Environmental Plaintiffs. 8. Nothing in this Consent Decree shall be construed to limit or modify any discretion accorded EPA by the CAA or by general principles of administrative law in taking the actions which are the subject of this Consent Decree, including the discretion to alter, amend, or 4

Case 1:13-cv-01553-GK Document 27-1 Filed 04/28/14 Page 5 of 11 revise any final actions contemplated by this Consent Decree. EPA s obligation to perform the actions specified by Paragraph 2 and 3 does not constitute a limitation or modification of EPA s discretion within the meaning of this paragraph. 9. Nothing in this Consent Decree shall be construed as an admission of any issue of fact or law or to waive or limit any claim or defense, on any grounds, related to any final action EPA may take with respect to the rulemaking identified in Paragraph 2 of this Consent Decree. 10. Nothing in this Consent Decree shall be construed to confer upon the district court jurisdiction to review any final rule issued by EPA pursuant to this Consent Decree. Nothing in this Consent Decree shall be construed to confer upon the district court jurisdiction to review any issues that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States Court of Appeals pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 7607(b)(1). Nothing in this Consent Decree shall be construed to waive any claims or defenses the Parties may have under 42 U.S.C. 7607(b)(1). 11. The Parties recognize and acknowledge that the obligations imposed upon EPA under this Consent Decree can only be undertaken using appropriated funds legally available for such purpose. No provision of this Consent Decree shall be interpreted as or constitute a commitment or requirement that EPA obligate or pay funds in contravention of the Anti- Deficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. 1341, or any other applicable provision of law. 12. Any notices required or provided for by this Consent Decree shall be made in writing or by email and sent to the following: For State Plaintiffs: Michael J. Myers New York State Attorney General Environmental Protection Bureau The Capitol 5

Case 1:13-cv-01553-GK Document 27-1 Filed 04/28/14 Page 6 of 11 Albany, NY 12224 Email:Michael.Myers@ag.ny.gov Scott N. Koschwitz State of Connecticut P.O. Box 120 55 Elm Street Hartford, CT 06141-0120 Email:Scott.Koschwitz@ct.gov Mary E. Raivel of Maryland Maryland Department of the Environment 1800 Washington Boulevard Suite 6048 Baltimore, MD 21230 Email:Mary.Raivel@maryland.gov Frederick D. Augenstern 1 Ashburton Place 18th Floor Boston, MA 02108 Email:Fred.Augenstern@state.ma.us Paul A. Garrahan Oregon Department of Justice Natural Resources Section, General Counsel Division 1515 SW Fifth Avenue Suite 400 Portland, OR 97239 Email:Paul.Garrahan@doj.state.or.us Gregory S. Schultz Rhode Island Department of Attorney General Civil Unit 150 South Main Street Providence, RI 02903 Email:Gschultz@riag.ri.gov Thea Schwartz State of Vermont 109 State Street Montpelier, VT 05609-1001 Email:Tschwartz@atg.state.vt.us Laurie Halvorson 6

Case 1:13-cv-01553-GK Document 27-1 Filed 04/28/14 Page 7 of 11 Puget Sound Clean Air Agency 1904 Third Avenue Suite 105 Seattle, WA 98101 Email:Laurieh@pscleanair.org For Environmental Plaintiffs: Timothy D. Ballo Earthjustice 1625 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Suite 702 Washington, DC 20036 Email:Tballo@earthjustice.org Tomás Carbonell Environmental Defense Fund 1875 Connecticut Ave., NW Sixth Floor Washington, DC 20009 Email:Tcarbonell@edf.org For Defendant: Eileen T. McDonough Environmental Defense Section U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044 eileen.mcdonough@usdoj.gov Scott Jordan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency William Jefferson Clinton North Building 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Mail Code: 2344A Washington, D.C. 20460 jordan.scott@epa.gov 13. In the event of a dispute among the Parties concerning the interpretation or implementation of any aspect of this Consent Decree, the disputing Party shall provide the other Party with a written notice outlining the nature of the dispute and requesting informal negotiations. The Parties shall meet and confer to attempt to resolve the dispute. If the Parties 7

Case 1:13-cv-01553-GK Document 27-1 Filed 04/28/14 Page 8 of 11 cannot reach an agreed-upon resolution after ten (10) business days following receipt of the written notice, any Party may move the Court to resolve the dispute. 14. No motion or other proceeding seeking to enforce this Consent Decree or for contempt of court shall be properly filed unless the Party seeking to enforce this Consent Decree has followed the procedure set forth in Paragraph 13. 15. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine and effectuate compliance with this Consent Decree, to resolve any disputes thereunder, and to consider any requests for costs of litigation (including reasonable attorneys fees). After EPA s obligations under Paragraphs 2 and 3 have been completed and after publication of notice of the final action required by Paragraph 2 in the Federal Register, EPA may move to have this Consent Decree terminated. The State and Environmental Plaintiffs shall have 14 days in which to respond to such motion. 16. It is hereby expressly understood and agreed that this Consent Decree was jointly drafted by the Parties and that any and all rules of construction to the effect that ambiguity is construed against the drafting party shall be inapplicable in any dispute concerning the terms, meaning, or interpretation of this Consent Decree. 17. The Parties agree and acknowledge that before this Consent Decree is entered by the Court, EPA must provide notice of this Consent Decree in the Federal Register and an opportunity for public comment pursuant to CAA section 113(g), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g). EPA will deliver a public notice of this Consent Decree to the Office of the Federal Register for publication and public comment within twenty-one (21) days after lodging this Consent Decree with the Court. After this Consent Decree has undergone notice and comment, the Administrator and/or the Attorney General, as appropriate, shall promptly consider any written comments received in determining whether to withdraw or withhold their consent to the Consent Decree, in 8

Case 1:13-cv-01553-GK Document 27-1 Filed 04/28/14 Page 9 of 11 accordance with CAA section 113(g). If the Administrator and the Attorney General do not elect to withdraw or withhold consent, EPA shall promptly file a motion that requests that the Court enter this Consent Decree. If a motion to enter the Consent Decree is not filed within ninety (90) days after the notice is published in the Federal Register, any party may file dispositive motions in this matter. 18. The undersigned certify that they are fully authorized by the Party or Parties they represent to bind that Party or those Parties to the terms of this Consent Decree. SO ORDERED this day of, 2014. SO AGREED: HON. GLADYS KESSLER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE For State Plaintiffs: /s/ Michael J. Myers Michael J. Myers New York State Attorney General Environmental Protection Bureau The Capitol Albany, NY 12224 Email:Michael.Myers@ag.ny.gov /s/ Scott N. Koschwitz Scott N. Koschwitz State of Connecticut P.O. Box 120 55 Elm Street Hartford, CT 06141-0120 Email:Scott.Koschwitz@ct.gov /s/ Mary E. Raivel Mary E. Raivel of Maryland Maryland Department of the Environment 9

Case 1:13-cv-01553-GK Document 27-1 Filed 04/28/14 Page 10 of 11 1800 Washington Boulevard Suite 6048 Baltimore, MD 21230 Email:Mary.Raivel@maryland.gov /s/ Frederick D. Augenstern Frederick D. Augenstern 1 Ashburton Place 18th Floor Boston, MA 02108 Email:Fred.Augenstern@state.ma.us /s/ Paul A. Garrahan Paul A. Garrahan Oregon Department of Justice Natural Resources Section, General Counsel Division 1515 SW Fifth Avenue Suite 400 Portland, OR 97239 Email:Paul.Garrahan@doj.state.or.us /s/ Gregory S. Schultz Gregory S. Schultz Rhode Island Department of Attorney General Civil Unit 150 South Main Street Providence, RI 02903 Email:Gschultz@riag.ri.gov /s/ Thea Schwartz Thea Schwartz State of Vermont 109 State Street Montpelier, VT 05609-1001 Email:Tschwartz@atg.state.vt.us /s/ Laurie Halvorson Laurie Halvorson Puget Sound Clean Air Agency 1904 Third Avenue Suite 105 Seattle, WA 98101 Email:Laurieh@pscleanair.org 10

Case 1:13-cv-01553-GK Document 27-1 Filed 04/28/14 Page 11 of 11 For Environmental Plaintiffs: /s/ Timothy D. Ballo Timothy D. Ballo Earthjustice 1625 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Suite 702 Washington, DC 20036 Email:Tballo@earthjustice.org For Defendant: Robert G. Dreher Acting Assistant Attorney General /s/ Eileen T. McDonough Eileen T. McDonough Environmental Defense Section U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044 eileen.mcdonough@usdoj.gov Scott Jordan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency William Jefferson Clinton North Building 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Mail Code: 2344A Washington, D.C. 20460 jordan.scott@epa.gov 11