Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Similar documents
Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 03/21/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-50

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 123 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 842

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this

Case 2:15-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/29/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 1:17-cv SLR Document 1 Filed 01/23/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 04/24/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:17-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/25/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 05/14/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Courthouse News Service

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case 1:14-cv JEI-KMW Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/26/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

Case 7:15-cv DAE Document 68 Filed 07/18/17 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND DIVISION

Case 2:10-cv GW-PLA Document 89 Filed 05/12/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:455

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/01/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:13-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 12/10/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:16-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 03/11/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

Case 3:18-cv VKD Document 1 Filed 12/18/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:17-cv RP-SBJ Document 1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 44 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 457

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION INTEX RECREATION CORP.,

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

FILED 2015 Mar-25 PM 03:41 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:17-cv JLL-JAD Document 1 Filed 05/12/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/28/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 35 Filed: 09/13/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:130

Case 2:17-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv DSC Document 1 Filed 04/27/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Transcription:

Case 2:16-cv-01453 Document 1 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION NICHIA CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. VIZIO, INC. Defendant. C.A. No. 2:16-cv-1453 Jury Trial Demanded COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff Nichia Corporation ( Nichia, by its undersigned counsel, with knowledge as to its own acts and status, and upon information and belief as to the acts and status of others, for its Complaint against defendant VIZIO, Inc. ( VIZIO, alleges as follows: PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1. This is an action for patent infringement under the United States patent laws, 35 U.S. C. 1, et seq. The accused products are LED televisions that are imported into the United States, and/or made, used, sold, and/or offered for sale, in the United States, in the State of Texas, and in this judicial district, by defendant VIZIO. The LED devices in the accused products backlighting apparatus infringe at least one of claims 1, 2, 4-8, 10, 12, 13, and 15-20 of U.S. Patent No. 9,490,411 (the 411 Patent, which is owned for all purposes by Plaintiff Nichia. 2. By this lawsuit, Nichia seeks relief for VIZIO s past and ongoing infringement of Nichia s 411 Patent by virtue of VIZIO s incorporation of infringing LEDs into its products. 1

Case 2:16-cv-01453 Document 1 Filed 12/27/16 Page 2 of 8 PageID #: 2 THE PARTIES 3. Plaintiff Nichia Corporation is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Japan, with its principal place of business at 491 Oka, Kaminaka-Cho, Anan-Shi, Tokushima, Japan 774-8601. 4. Defendant VIZIO, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, but in 2015 VIZIO reported its intention to reincorporate in the State of Delaware. VIZIO s principal place of business is at 39 Tesla, Irvine, California 92618. VIZIO may be served with process by serving its registered agent, Registered Agent Solutions, Inc. at 1220 S. St. STE 150, Sacramento, California 95811. 5. VIZIO imports, sells, and/or offers for sale nationwide television products that contain light-emitting diode ( LED devices, including in the State of Texas and in this judicial district. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 6. This is a civil action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws, 35 U.S.C. 1, et seq. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a. 7. VIZIO is subject to personal jurisdiction in this judicial district because VIZIO is present within, has minimum contacts with, and regularly conducts business in the State of Texas and the Eastern District of Texas. 8. Venue is proper in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. 1391 and 1400(b. 9. Among other things, VIZIO has purposefully availed itself of the privileges of conducting business in the State of Texas and in this judicial district; VIZIO has sought protection and benefit from the laws of the State of Texas; VIZIO has solicited business in, 2

Case 2:16-cv-01453 Document 1 Filed 12/27/16 Page 3 of 8 PageID #: 3 transacted business within, and has attempted to derive financial benefit from residents of the State of Texas and this judicial district; and Nichia s cause of action arises directly from VIZIO s business contacts and other activities in the State of Texas and in this judicial district. 10. More specifically, the accused VIZIO television products have been imported into, offered for sale, and sold by or on behalf of VIZIO in the Eastern District of Texas, and the accused VIZIO television products have been, and continue to be, used in the Eastern District of Texas. VIZIO, directly and/or through its agents and intermediaries, has placed the products at issue in this lawsuit into the stream of commerce throughout the United States through established distribution channels, with the expectation and/or knowledge that they will be offered for sale, sold, and used in the State of Texas and in this judicial district. Without limiting the foregoing, VIZIO distributes products, including infringing television products, throughout the United States from three third-party logistics centers. One of these distribution centers is located in Grand View, Texas. 11. VIZIO s television products containing infringing LED devices are sold in retail stores in the State of Texas and throughout this judicial district, including Walmart, Target, Sam s Club, and Best Buy retail stores. These retail stores, collectively, have 29 outlets in this judicial district. VIZIO has reported that it has the first or second shelf-space positions at these retailers, and these four retailers accounted for approximately 81% of VIZIO s net sales during the six-month period ending June 30, 2015. These retailers currently sell and/or offer for sale VIZIO television products containing infringing LED devices, such as VIZIO s D-Series 28 Class Full-Array LED TV D28h-C1. 12. VIZIO has participated in patent-infringement lawsuits in judicial districts throughout the United States, including in the Eastern District of Texas. 3

Case 2:16-cv-01453 Document 1 Filed 12/27/16 Page 4 of 8 PageID #: 4 THE PATENT-IN-SUIT 13. U.S. Patent No. 9,490,411, entitled Light Emitting Device, Resin Package, Resin-Molded Body, and Methods for Manufacturing Light-Emitting Device, Resin Package and Resin-Molded Body, was duly and lawfully issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on November 8, 2016. A true and correct copy of the 411 Patent is attached as Exhibit A. The 411 Patent is a continuation of Application No. 13/969,182, filed on August 16, 2013, which is a continuation of Application No. 12/737,940, filed as Application No. PCT/JP2009/004170 on August 27, 2009, now Patent No. 8,530,250 (the 250 Patent. 14. The 411 Patent lists Hirofumi Ichikawa, Masaki Hayashi, Shimpei Sasaoka, and Tomohide Miki as inventors. 15. Nichia is the owner of the 411 Patent by valid assignment from the inventors. Nichia owns all rights, title, and interest in the 411 Patent, including the right to sue for and recover all past, present, and future damages for infringement of the 411 Patent. 16. The Abstract of the 411 Patent provides as follows: A method of manufacturing a light emitting device having a resin package which provides an optical reflectivity equal to or more than 70% at a wavelength between 350 nm and 800 nm after thermal curing, and in which a resin part and a lead are formed in a substantially same plane in an outer side surface, includes a step of sandwiching a lead frame provided with a notch part, by means of an upper mold and a lower mold, a step of transfer-molding a thermosetting resin containing a light reflecting material in a mold sandwiched by the upper mold and the lower mold to form a resin-molded body in the lead frame and a step of cutting the resin-molded body and the lead frame along the notch part. VIZIO S INFRINGING CONDUCT 17. VIZIO imports into the United States, and manufactures, uses, sells, and/or offers for sale in the United States, televisions that incorporate LED devices that infringe at least claim 1 of the 411 Patent, which reads: 4

Case 2:16-cv-01453 Document 1 Filed 12/27/16 Page 5 of 8 PageID #: 5 1. A light emitting device comprising: a resin package comprising a resin part and a metal part including at least two metal plates, said resin package having four outer lateral surfaces and having a concave portion having a bottom surface; and a light emitting element mounted on the bottom surface of the concave portion and electrically connected to the metal part, wherein at least a portion of an outer lateral surface of the resin part and at least a portion of an outer lateral surface of the metal part are coplanar at an outer lateral surface of the resin package, wherein both a part of the metal part and a part of the resin part are disposed in a region below an upper surface of the metal part, on four outer lateral surfaces of the resin package, and wherein a notch is formed in the metal part at each of the four outer lateral surfaces of the resin package. 18. The LED devices in the accused televisions, including at least VIZIO s D28h-C1 LED TV and D28hn-D1 LED TV, are light emitting devices that include a resin package comprising a resin part and a metal part including at least two metal plates. In addition, in the LED devices incorporated in the accused televisions, the resin package has four outer lateral surfaces, a concave portion having a bottom surface, and a light emitting element mounted on the bottom surface of the concave portion and electrically connected to the metal part. In these LED devices, at least a portion of an outer lateral surface of the resin part and at least a portion of an outer lateral surface of the metal part are coplanar at an outer lateral surface of the resin package. Moreover, both a part of the metal part and a part of the resin part are disposed in a region below an upper surface of the metal part, on four outer lateral surfaces of the resin package. In addition, in these LED devices, a notch is formed in the metal part at each of the four outer lateral surfaces of the resin package. Further, the LED devices incorporated in the accused 5

Case 2:16-cv-01453 Document 1 Filed 12/27/16 Page 6 of 8 PageID #: 6 televisions also include the additional elements of at least one of claims 2, 4-8, 10, 12, 13, and 15-20 of the 411 patent. 19. VIZIO, directly and/or through intermediaries and agents, has imported into the United States, used, sold and/or offered to sell in the United States, including in this judicial district, television products, such as the D28h-C1 LED TV, that incorporate the infringing LED devices. COUNT I (Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,490,411 (35 U.S. C. 271(a 20. Nichia repeats and re-alleges each and every allegation of paragraphs 1-19 as if fully set forth herein. 21. The 411 Patent is valid and enforceable. 22. By its importation into the United States, use, and sale and/or offer for sale in the United States, of television products that incorporate infringing LED devices, including but not limited to, for example, the VIZIO D-Series 28 Class Full-Array LED TV D28h-C1 and the D28hn-D1 LED TV, VIZIO has been and is now infringing, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, at least one of claims 1, 2, 4-8, 10, 12, 13, and 15-20 of the 411 Patent, in the State of Texas, in this judicial district, and elsewhere, in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(a. 411 Patent. 23. VIZIO s actions are without the consent of Nichia. 24. Nichia has been and will continue to be damaged by VIZIO s infringement of the 25. Nichia and has been and will continue to be irreparably harmed unless VIZIO s infringement of the 411 Patent is enjoined. 6

Case 2:16-cv-01453 Document 1 Filed 12/27/16 Page 7 of 8 PageID #: 7 JURY DEMAND 26. Nichia hereby requests a trial by jury pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Nichia Corporation prays that the Court enter judgment against Defendant VIZIO and in favor of Nichia, as follows: A. Finding that the 411 Patent was duly and lawfully issued, and is valid and enforceable. B. Finding that VIZIO has infringed one or more of the claims of the 411 Patent; C. Awarding damages to Nichia in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 284 and 35 U.S.C. 154(d, including pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, to compensate Nichia for VIZIO s infringement of the 411 Patent; D. Ordering preliminary and permanent injunctive relief restraining and enjoining VIZIO and its officers, agents, attorneys, employees, and those acting in privity or active concert with VIZIO, from infringement of the 411 Patent for the full term thereof; E. Finding that this case is exceptional pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285; F. Awarding Nichia its costs and attorneys fees; and G. Awarding Nichia such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. DATED: December 27, 2016 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Otis Carroll Otis Carroll -- State Bar No. 03895700 otiscarroll@icklaw.com Collin Michael Maloney -- State Bar No. 00794219 cmaloney@icklaw.com IRELAND CARROLL & KELLEY 7

Case 2:16-cv-01453 Document 1 Filed 12/27/16 Page 8 of 8 PageID #: 8 6101 S Broadway, Suite 500 Tyler, TX 75703 Tel: (903 561-1600 Fax: (903 581-1071 and ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, P.C. Robert P. Parker* Martin M. Zoltick* Steven P. Weihrouch* Jenny L. Colgate* Michael H. Jones* Daniel McCallum* Nechama E. Potasnick* Mark T. Rawls* 607 14 th Street, N.W. Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20005 Tel: (202 783-6040 Fax: (202 783-6031 Email: NichiaLIT@rfem.com Attorneys for Plaintiff *Applications for admission pro hac vice are filed herewith. 8