Attorneys for Pinal County IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PINAL. No.

Similar documents
Superior Court of California

PORTIONS OF ILLINOIS FORCIBLE ENTRY AND DETAINER ACT 735 ILCS 5/9-101 et. seq.

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, STATE OF UTAH COUNTY OF TOOELE, TOOELE DEPARTMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )_ ) ) ) ) )

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA. Case No Plaintiff, Defendants.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and all those similarly situated.

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 3:18-cv BAJ-RLB Document 1 08/17/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

BYLAWS OF ISLANDER HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. A North Carolina Nonprofit Corporation Under the Laws of the State of North Carolina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DC CAUSE NO. CDK REALTY ADVISORS, LP IN THE DISTRICT COURT. v. DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS. Defendant. JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Case 3:07-cv JCS Document 1 Filed 09/27/2007 Page 1 of 5

FORM 5- COMPLAINT FOR LANDLORD TO EVICT TENANTS FORM 5A COMPLAINT FOR LANDLORD TO EVICT TENANTS FOR FAILURE TO PAY RENT AND TO RECOVER PAST DUE RENT

F I L E D Clerk of the Supen'or Court

Title 14: COURT PROCEDURE -- CIVIL

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/27/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EXTENDED VACATION OCCUPANCY AGREEMENT (For Recreational Vehicle Space)

City of Chilliwack. Bylaw No A bylaw to provide for a revitalization tax exemption

Attorney for Plaintiff WORLD LOGISTICS SERVICES, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/21/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/21/2017 EXHIBIT E

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT. ) [Unlimited Jurisdiction] ) ) Case No.:

Case 3:17-cv BRM-DEA Document 1 Filed 03/27/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 1. Plaintiff, : v. : : : Defendant. : COMPLAINT

Case 8:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1

BYLAWS OF WOODBRIDGE PARK PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., A NORTH CAROLINA NON-PROFIT CORPORATION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/26/2010 INDEX NO /2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/26/2010

PROMISSORY NOTE SECURED BY DEED OF TRUST Condominium Conversion BMR Program

City v.7, 8/21/15 AMENDED AND RESTATED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE AGREEMENT

1. OVERTIME COMPENSATION AND

Plaintiff Peter Alexander ( Plaintiff ), individually and on behalf of all others similarly

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/06/ :59 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/06/2016

AGREEMENT. provide LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES. between. the CITY OF CAVE JUNCTION. and JOSEPHINE COUNTY

DEED OF TRUST. County and State Where Real Property is located:

J.S.C X Index No.: DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.

Case 1:16-cv LTS Document 5 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 9. Plaintiff, Defendants.

GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

QUINTILONE & ASSOCIATES

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION LORAX CORPORATION, CASE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Attorneys for Plaintiff STEVE THOMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEVE THOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.: 1. BREACH OF IMPLIED CONTRACT 2. TRESPASS TO CHATTEL

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

MASSACHUSETTS CLEAN ENERGY TECHNOLOGY CENTER RENEWABLE ENERGY TRUST FUND MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

No. PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION, REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS. Plaintiff, MIKE complains of defendants STEPHEN and

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION MECHANICS LIEN SECTION

GENERAL MANAGER SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/02/ :01 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/02/2016

CAIIN & PARRA, EEC 1015 New Durham Road Edison, New Jersey (732) Attorney for Plaintiff(s)

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA

wage statements that comply with California law (or provide wage statements at all). Finally,

Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs Cat Cora and Cat Cora, Inc. (collectively, Cora ), by their attorneys Oved & SUMMARY OF ACTION

EBERHARD SCHONEBURG, ) SECURITIES LAWS

MOHAVE COUNTY JUSTICE COURT

Case 2:06-cv JLL-CCC Document 55 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 1 of 27

DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING DISTRICT COURT FILING AND JURY TRIAL FEES FOR THE CITY OF LACEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

LICENSE AGREEMENT RECITALS:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/14/ :52 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/14/2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Charlotte Division Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 15

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/19/ :22 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/19/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/17/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/17/2017

Filing # E-Filed 12/22/ :53:20 PM

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER WAGE GARNISHMENT. Self Help Center Loca ons:

a Delaware limited liability company CK $ $ SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF v;.r1l,~ FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA

GOVERNMENT CODE CHAPTER PUBLIC WORK PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec DEFINITIONS.

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/23/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

VEATCH CARLSON, LLP. Plaintiff YVES CLEMENT alleges as follows: 1 COMPLAINT

NEGLIGENCE. All four of the following must be demonstrated for a legal claim of negligence to be successful:

U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center

1. Recording a notice in the office of the recorder of each county where the trust property is situated.

NOTICE OF SMALL CLAIM

c t MECHANICS LIEN ACT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16-cv-438 THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/02/ /15/ :56 02:55 AM PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 149 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/02/2015

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION

RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION RAILROAD LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH (INSERT NAME OF PARTY)

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/09/ :06 PM

END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/03/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) )

ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES TITLE 33. PROPERTY CHAPTER 3. LANDLORD AND TENANT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON

Case 3:16-cv LB Document 1 Filed 06/11/16 Page 1 of 14

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/16/ :13 PM INDEX NO /2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/16/2018

P H I L L I P S DAYES

INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR AGENCY PARTICIPATION IN THE PINAL COUNTY NARCOTICS TASK FORCE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 6TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION CASE NO: XXX MORTGAGE CORPORATION

DS DRAFT 4/8/19 Deleted: 2 FIRST SUPPLEMENT TO THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT DATED AS OF: JANUARY 1, 2010 AMONG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E

CASE NO. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. The Plaintiff, CHARLESETTA WALKER, as CONSERVATOR FOR THE PERSON,

Transcription:

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Eric D. Gere - 0 egere@jsslaw.com JENNINGS, STROUSS & SALMON, P.L.C. A Professional Limited Liability Company One East Washington Street Suite 00 Phoenix, Arizona 00- Telephone: (0) - MinuteEntries@jsslaw.com Attorneys for Pinal County IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA Pinal County, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, vs. IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PINAL Plaintiff, Marana Aerospace Solutions, Inc., a foreign corporation, f/d/b/a Evergreen Maintenance Center, Inc., f/d/b/a Evergreen Air Center, Inc.; John and Jane Does 1-; ABC Entities 1-; Black and White Partnerships 1-; Defendants. No. Plaintiff, Pinal County, for its Complaint alleges: COMPLAINT (Breach of Contract; Breach of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing) PARTIES, JURISDICTION & VENUE 1. Plaintiff Pinal County is a political subdivision of the State of Arizona. Pinal County is the owner of the Pinal Airpark located just north of the City of Marana.. Upon information and belief, Defendant Marana Aerospace Solutions, Inc. ( MAS ) is a foreign corporation authorized to and conducting business in Arizona. Between April 1, 00 and February 1, 01, MAS conducted business under the name Evergreen Maintenance Center, Inc. Prior to April 1, 00, MAS conducted business under the name Evergreen Air Center, Inc.. Defendants John Does and Jane Does 1-, inclusive, and ABC Entities 1-0v1(.1)

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1, inclusive, and Black and White Partnerships 1-, are persons, entities, or partnerships who are or may be liable to Pinal County on the causes of action sued upon herein, or who have otherwise caused or contributed to Pinal County s damages as hereinafter alleged, but whose true names and capacities are presently unknown to Pinal County. Therefore, Pinal County sues said Defendants by such fictitious names. Pinal County will amend this Complaint to set forth the true names and capacities of said Defendants once the same have been ascertained.. The acts and events giving rise to the claims herein took place wholly or in part in Pinal County, Arizona.. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to Article, Section 1, Paragraphs 1 and of the Arizona Constitution. Venue is proper in Pinal County pursuant to A.R.S. 1-01. FACTUAL BACKGROUND. The Pinal Airpark is a county-owned airport located just north of the Pinal/Pima County line along Interstate. The airport was constructed in as a United States Army Airfield. The airbase was closed in. By quit claim deed dated June 1,, the United States conveyed the airbase to Pinal County.. In, Pinal County and MAS entered into an exclusive lease for Pinal Airpark ( Original Lease ). The lease had a term of twenty-five years ending on August 1, 00.. On June 1,, Pinal County and MAS entered into an Amended Lease for the Pinal Airpark ( Amended Lease ). The Amended Lease modified and amended the terms, covenants, agreements and conditions of the Original Lease and extended the term of the Original Lease through August 1, 0.. Section of the Amended Lease governs the rent owed by MAS during the term of the Amended Lease.. Pursuant to Section.1 of the Amended Lease, MAS agreed to and was 0v1(.1)

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 obligated to pay an initial onetime payment in the amount of no less than $00,000 due and payable on or before June 0,.. Pursuant to Section. of the Amended Lease, the Annual Rent for the Contract Year (each Contract Year runs from August 1 of that calendar year through August 1 of the year following, and is identified by the year in which the Contract Year begins) was $00,000. 1. Pursuant to Section. of the Amended Lease, MAS agreed that for the period from August 1, through August 1, 0, the Annual Rent for each Contract Year shall be equal to the product of the Annual Rent for the previous Contract Year times an Inflation Quotient ( IQ ). 1. Pursuant to Section..1, MAS agreed that the IQ for each Contract Year shall be computed at the beginning of the calendar year and would be equal to the sum of one (1.0) plus an escalating factor ( EF ). 1. Pursuant to Section..1.1 of the Amended Lease, MAS agreed that the EF for Contract Year and each Contract Year thereafter would be equal to the percentage of change in the applicable CPI index for January of the calendar year as compared with January of the year prior. MAS further agreed that the EF would never be less than zero percent or exceed five percent, except as otherwise specified in Section..1. of the Amended Lease. 1. Pursuant to Section..1. of the Amended Lease, MAS agreed that the applicable CPI index shall be the composite index specified under the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for the West Region, Size class C, published in the Annual January CPI Detailed Report each year. 1. Pursuant to Section.. of the Amended Lease, MAS agreed that it would be the Annual Rent, calculated in the manner set forth in Section of the Amended Lease, in four quarterly installments, each installment equal to one quarter of the Annual Rent. 1. Despite the rent obligations set forth in the Amended Lease, MAS has failed 0v1(.1)

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 to make the Annual Rent payment required under the Amended Lease for each Contract Year beginning with Contract Year. 1. Pursuant to Section of the Amended Lease, the EF for was 1.01.. The Annual Rent owed by MAS for Contract Year was $,0.. 0. MAS paid rent in the amount of $,01. for Contract Year. 1. MAS owes Pinal County $,. for Contract Year.. Pursuant to Section of the Amended Lease, the EF for 000 was 1.00.. The Annual Rent owed by MAS for Contract Year 000 was $0,1... MAS paid rent in the amount of $,01. for Contract Year 000.. MAS owes Pinal County $1,.1 for Contract Year 000.. Pursuant to Section of the Amended Lease, the EF for Contract Year 001 was 1.0.. The Annual Rent owed by MAS for Contract Year 001 was $,... MAS paid rent in the amount of $,01. for Contract Year 001.. MAS owes Pinal County $,01. for Contract Year 001. 0. Pursuant to Section of the Amended Lease, the EF for Contract Year 00 was 1.0. 1. The Annual Rent owed by MAS for Contract Year 00 was $0,0... MAS paid rent in the amount of $,01. for Contract Year 00.. MAS owes Pinal County $,0. for Contract Year 00.. Pursuant to Section of the Amended Lease, the EF for Contract Year 00 was 1.01.. The Annual Rent owed by MAS for Contract Year 00 was $0,.1.. MAS paid rent in the amount of $,01. for Contract Year 00.. MAS owes Pinal County $1,.0 for Contract Year 00.. Pursuant to Section of the Amended Lease, the EF for Contract Year 00 was 1.0. 0v1(.1)

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1. The Annual Rent owed by MAS for Contract Year 00 was $1,0.0. 0. MAS paid rent in the amount of $,01. for Contract Year 00. 1. The past due balance for Contract Year 00 is $,.1.. Pursuant to Section of the Amended Lease, the EF for Contract Year 00 was 1.00.. The Annual Rent owed by MAS for Contract Year 00 was $0,0... MAS paid rent in the amount of $,01. for Contract Year 00.. The past due balance for Contract Year 00 is $1,.1.. Pursuant to Section of the Amended Lease, the EF for Contract Year 00 was 1.0.. The Annual Rent owed by MAS for Contract Year 00 was $,... MAS paid rent in the amount of $,01. for Contract Year 00.. The past due balance for Contract Year 00 is $,0.. 0. Pursuant to Section of the Amended Lease, the EF for Contract Year 00 was 1.0. 1. The Annual Rent owed by MAS for Contract Year 00 was $,0.0.. MAS paid rent in the amount of $,01. for Contract Year 00.. The past due balance for Contract Year 00 is $,... Pursuant to Section of the Amended Lease, the EF for Contract Year 00 was 1.00.. The Annual Rent owed by MAS for Contract Year 00 was $,0... MAS paid rent in the amount of $,01. for Contract Year 00.. The past due balance for Contract Year 00 is $,0... Pursuant to Section of the Amended Lease, the EF for Contract Year 00 was 1.0.. The Annual Rent owed by MAS for Contract Year 00 was $,0.. 0. MAS paid rent in the amount of $,01. for Contract Year 00. 0v1(.1)

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1. The past due balance for Contract Year 00 is $,0... Pursuant to Section of the Amended Lease, the EF for Contract Year 0 was 1.01.. The Annual Rent owed by MAS for Contract Year 0 was $,1.1.. MAS paid rent in the amount of $,01. for Contract Year 0.. The past due balance for Contract Year 0 is $,1... Pursuant to Section of the Amended Lease, the EF for Contract Year 0 was 1.01.. The Annual Rent owed by MAS for Contract Year 0 was $,0... MAS paid rent in the amount of $,1. for Contract Year 0.. The past due balance for Contract Year 0 is $,1.0. 0. The total amount of past due rent owed to Pinal County by MAS is $,.. 1. By letter dated December, 0, Pinal County demanded that MAS pay the accrued balance due under the Amended Lease. MAS failed, refused, and neglected to cure its breach.. By letter dated March, 01, Pinal County delivered a second notice to MAS stating that MAS is in breach of the Amended Lease as a result of its failure to perform its obligation to pay rent and demanded that MAS cure its breach. MAS failed, refused, and neglected to cure its breach.. The Amended Lease states that in the event of any action brought by either party against the other under the Amended Lease, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover for the fees of its attorney in such action, including costs of appeal, if any, in such amount as the court or arbitrator may adjudge reasonable as attorneys fees. COUNT ONE (Breach of Contract). Pinal County incorporates by reference the allegations in each of the 0v1(.1)

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 preceding paragraphs of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein.. The Amended Lease is a valid and enforceable agreement, the terms of which, including those terms that govern the rent owed to Pinal County, MAS was obligated to perform.. By failing to pay the rent required under the Amended Lease, MAS has committed material breaches of the Amended Lease.. Pinal County performed all of its contractual duties and obligations that it was required to perform under the Amended Lease.. MAS performance is due and owing and there is no excuse for its failure to perform.. MAS s failure to pay the rent required under the Amended Lease has caused and proximately caused damage to Pinal County in an amount in excess of this Court s jurisdictional minimum, and in no event less than $,., plus reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses incurred enforcing Pinal County s rights under the Amended Lease. 0. Under Section.0 of the Amended Lease, Pinal County is entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys fees. 1. In the alternative, because this matter arises out of contract, Pinal County is entitled to its reasonable attorneys fees under A.R.S. 1-1.01.. Pinal County is entitled to prejudgment interest on the past due rent.. Pinal County is entitled to its costs pursuant to A.R.S. 1-1. COUNT TWO (Breach of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing). Pinal County incorporates by reference the allegations in each of the preceding paragraphs of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein.. Every contract, including the Amended Lease, contains an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.. Through its acts and omissions described above, MAS acted in a manner that 0v1(.1)

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 impaired Pinal County s rights to receive the benefits of the Amended Lease, thereby breaching the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.. As a direct and proximate result of MAS s breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, Pinal County has suffered damages in an amount to be determined at trial, but in no event are Pinal County s damages less than $,., plus reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses incurred enforcing Pinal County s rights under the Amended Lease.. Under Section.0 of the Amended Lease, Pinal County is entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys fees.. In the alternative, because this matter arises out of contract, Pinal County is entitled to its reasonable attorneys fees under A.R.S. 1-1.01. 0. Pinal County is entitled to prejudgment interest on the past due rent. 1. Pinal County is entitled to its costs pursuant to A.R.S. 1-1. WHEREFORE, Pinal County demands judgment as follows: A. Awarding Pinal County the full amount of its damages; B. Awarding Pinal County all reasonable attorneys fees, court costs, costs of investigation and other related expenses incurred by Pinal County in connection with this matter; C. Awarding Pinal County prejudgment and post-judgment interest; D. Awarding such other and further relief as is just and proper. DATED this day of July, 01. JENNINGS, STROUSS & SALMON, P.L.C. 0v1(.1) By Eric D. Gere One East Washington Street, th Floor Phoenix, Arizona 00- Attorneys for Pinal County